This document provides an introduction, executive summary, and scope for research on identifying support needed by the UK's further education sector to implement shared services models. The research objectives are to describe possible shared services models and current activities in both further and higher education. It will also review previous shared services projects funded by the Learning and Skills Council and provide recommendations on short and long-term support needed for implementation. The research methodology includes interviews with key stakeholders and a review of documentation, with a particular focus on collaboration fund projects and case studies of colleges working together.
The document summarizes several ongoing reviews that will impact post-16 education in Scotland. Key points include:
1) Reviews cover college governance, ICT infrastructure, and the role of colleges. Recommendations include regionalization and shared services.
2) Budget cuts of 7-23% are expected over the next few years for colleges. Capital funding is also being cut significantly.
3) The "Putting Learners at the Centre" review proposes a more interconnected, sustainable, and learner-centered post-16 system focused on employment.
4) Colleges will receive regional funding to enhance regional provision and outcomes. Courses must focus on recognized qualifications and job skills. Funding models will
This document summarizes several case studies of shared services projects between UK colleges. It profiles the partnership between Aylesbury College and Buckinghamshire New University, which received funding to explore creating a joint "sustainable learning community" through curriculum and back office collaboration. The goals were to improve progression routes, deliver flexible education, and raise aspirations across all levels of training. While the focus is growth over savings, some efficiencies were achieved in marketing and HR. Moving forward, the main challenges will be practical implementation as the vision is realized.
A presentation reporting the first year of an employer engagement project. The presentation focus is on the structural capital of the developng project.
For more details see www.reednet.org, www.lydiaarnold.net
The document discusses a project in West Yorkshire, England to simplify leadership and management education progression from levels 3 to 7. It aimed to develop clear pathways between qualifications, agree credit transfers, and communicate options through an online tool. Key challenges included organizational changes and differing quality assurance systems across diverse partner institutions. The project overcame barriers by gaining high-level support, mapping qualifications, and developing a common credit transfer model between ILM and CMI certificates and diplomas accepted by most partners. This emergent model provides a simplified way for learners to progress between vocational and higher education leadership programs.
AHDS Annual Conference November 2014 'Teaching Scotland's Future: What you need to know and do.' Workshop on GTCS Professional Update and Standard by Ken Muir, Chief Executive of GTCS and Martin Osler, Director of Communications, Digital Development and Human Resources at GTCS.
Workplace Mentoring: a literature review (2009)WERDS_NZ
This review was developed with funding from Ako Aotearoa. It focuses on mentoring for apprentices and touches on mentoring to support language, literacy and numeracy development. The review explores traditional and relational models of mentoring and discusses the benefits, issues and gaps raised by the literature in terms of different types of mentoring offered in organisations. The review is also posted on the Ako Aotearoa website where some other publications by Chris Holland can be found
The document summarizes several ongoing reviews that will impact post-16 education in Scotland. Key points include:
1) Reviews cover college governance, ICT infrastructure, and the role of colleges. Recommendations include regionalization and shared services.
2) Budget cuts of 7-23% are expected over the next few years for colleges. Capital funding is also being cut significantly.
3) The "Putting Learners at the Centre" review proposes a more interconnected, sustainable, and learner-centered post-16 system focused on employment.
4) Colleges will receive regional funding to enhance regional provision and outcomes. Courses must focus on recognized qualifications and job skills. Funding models will
This document summarizes several case studies of shared services projects between UK colleges. It profiles the partnership between Aylesbury College and Buckinghamshire New University, which received funding to explore creating a joint "sustainable learning community" through curriculum and back office collaboration. The goals were to improve progression routes, deliver flexible education, and raise aspirations across all levels of training. While the focus is growth over savings, some efficiencies were achieved in marketing and HR. Moving forward, the main challenges will be practical implementation as the vision is realized.
A presentation reporting the first year of an employer engagement project. The presentation focus is on the structural capital of the developng project.
For more details see www.reednet.org, www.lydiaarnold.net
The document discusses a project in West Yorkshire, England to simplify leadership and management education progression from levels 3 to 7. It aimed to develop clear pathways between qualifications, agree credit transfers, and communicate options through an online tool. Key challenges included organizational changes and differing quality assurance systems across diverse partner institutions. The project overcame barriers by gaining high-level support, mapping qualifications, and developing a common credit transfer model between ILM and CMI certificates and diplomas accepted by most partners. This emergent model provides a simplified way for learners to progress between vocational and higher education leadership programs.
AHDS Annual Conference November 2014 'Teaching Scotland's Future: What you need to know and do.' Workshop on GTCS Professional Update and Standard by Ken Muir, Chief Executive of GTCS and Martin Osler, Director of Communications, Digital Development and Human Resources at GTCS.
Workplace Mentoring: a literature review (2009)WERDS_NZ
This review was developed with funding from Ako Aotearoa. It focuses on mentoring for apprentices and touches on mentoring to support language, literacy and numeracy development. The review explores traditional and relational models of mentoring and discusses the benefits, issues and gaps raised by the literature in terms of different types of mentoring offered in organisations. The review is also posted on the Ako Aotearoa website where some other publications by Chris Holland can be found
This document provides information about organizational changes at Houston Community College (HCC). It outlines a new organizational structure with the goals of improving student satisfaction, empowering divisions, improving communications, and reducing process times. The new structure divides the organization into an instruction division, student services division, finance and administration division, and other supporting divisions. It also outlines changes to restructure the HCC police department to improve services across campuses by implementing 10-hour shifts, centralized communications, and increased supervisor presence in the field. The changes are aimed at benefiting both police and the HCC community.
George Liu has obtained a PhD in Accounting from Waikato Management School in New Zealand. His dissertation focused on improving corporate internet reporting in China. He has since worked as a co-organizer of a research program for New Zealand students to learn about Chinese business culture. Additionally, he co-founded an international trading company between China and New Zealand and gives talks on Chinese business culture for adult education classes.
The document summarizes discussions from a seminar on the future of architectural education. Key points include:
- There was discussion on the purpose of architectural education and ensuring employability amid higher education changes.
- Regulatory bodies like the ARB and RIBA were reviewed in the context of criteria for architectural qualifications.
- Pathways like integrated degrees and apprenticeships were discussed as alternatives to traditional education models.
- Challenges for schools were outlined, such as being competitive and addressing affordability and diversity in programs.
- The school's curriculum review was summarized, which explored more flexible pathways and satisfying new requirements.
- Groups were tasked with discussing related topics and proposing action research projects on issues in
Mahara for practical teaching and learning in an online Theatre Studies progr...Mahara Hui
Presentation by David Matthews and Jayne Richards (Rose Bruford College of Theatre and Performance) at Mahara Hui UK in Southampton, UK, on 10 November 2015.
Recording: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfUVijh6hF8
The document provides an overview of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) including:
- A brief history of the CCSS and how they were developed in a state-led process.
- Key differences between current standards and the CCSS in English Language Arts and math, including a greater focus on non-fiction texts and mathematical practices.
- Challenges and concerns around implementing the new standards, including potential drops in proficiency rates, technology needs, and the time needed for teachers and students to adjust.
- Recommendations for state and local policymakers to create support for the standards and monitor implementation progress over time.
The document summarizes discussions from workshops at an IAU experts' seminar on higher education and education for all in Mozambique. Key issues raised included the unknown and unclear role of higher education in achieving education for all goals, focus on teacher training, obstacles like poor teacher motivation and communications between higher education institutions and ministries. Recommendations focused on sharing information, research collaboration, advocacy, and student involvement to strengthen contributions of higher education and research to meeting education for all targets.
This document provides guidelines for developing case studies about architectural projects. It includes sections on project abstracts, perspectives, analysis, and submission guidelines. The intended purpose is to create a body of knowledge about architecture practice through rigorous case studies. Case studies can be used for education in schools of architecture and continuing education for practitioners. They provide context and lessons about the complexity of projects and decision making in architectural practice.
This document provides an overview of professional learning communities (PLCs) in the expanded learning field based on evaluations of 5 PLC initiatives in Oakland, California supported by the S.D. Bechtel Jr. Foundation over 5 years. PLCs are collaborative groups of professionals that meet regularly to improve their practice through reflection, data review, and strategy sharing. The document finds that PLCs benefit expanded learning program staff, programs, and youth. Staff gain content knowledge and are satisfied with PLCs, programs offer more content-focused activities, and youth receive more exposure to enrichment, though direct youth outcomes are limited. The document outlines best practices for implementing effective expanded learning PLCs including encouraging collaboration, developing participant leadership,
On and off the job: learning experiences, connections and implications for Li...WERDS_NZ
This research project was commissioned by the Joinery Industry Training Organisation (JITO) to understand learning on and off the job, the connections between them, and where learning support (specifically with literacy, language and numeracy) can be provided. Specifically it asks: How do glass apprentices manage formal and informal learning?; how does learning on the first block course support learning on-the-job?; how do apprentices learn on the job and in self-directed study?; how does learning on the job and self directed study support learning on the second block course?; how could learning, and literacy and numeracy development in particular, be strengthened?
Mobilising a nation: RDM education and training in South Africaheila1
Big data; small data; case study; SKA, research data management; university libraries; NeDICC; NRF announcement; UCT, UP, Wits; training intervention; DCC; Carnegie
ESRC Knowledge Brokerage conference: the third sectorKarl Wilding
The panel discussed three approaches to knowledge exchange between academia, policymakers, and practitioners in the third sector. The Third Sector Research Centre aims to bridge gaps and build understanding between these groups to inform policy and practice. Their approach includes establishing advisory boards and reference groups, producing accessible research, and using various dissemination methods. Knowledge exchange partnerships were also discussed as a way to transfer knowledge between universities and organizations while benefiting all parties.
Ontario CIO Shared Service Meeting June 1 2018eCampusOntario
This document provides an agenda and overview for a Shared Services meeting at eCampusOntario. The agenda includes welcoming introductions, discussing eCampusOntario's context and test concepts, collecting thoughts on a test concept, supporting equity and access, discussing a provincial survey structure and communications strategy, measuring sandbox success, and next steps. The overview discusses eCampusOntario's reach across Ontario post-secondary institutions, the principles of extending practice and rethinking as themes to guide program designs, assumptions about openness, examples of open educational resources, and potential benefits and structures for a shared services program.
The document discusses the emerging regulatory environment in higher education in England. It outlines the government's policy drivers of creating a more open, dynamic and affordable system with more competition. It also discusses the challenges of uncertainty around issues like student number controls and future funding. Key projects of the Regulatory Partnership Group are outlined, including developing a new operating framework and financial memorandum to replace HEFCE's and provide accountability for all public funds. The replacement is planned for introduction in autumn 2013 after consultations.
The document provides an overview of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and discusses some of the challenges of implementing them. It notes that 46 states and DC have adopted the CCSS, which are intended to prepare students for college and careers. While the standards emphasize rigor, many students initially scored below proficiency on CCSS-aligned assessments in early-adopting states like Kentucky. Full implementation will require significant investments in technology, curriculum, and professional development to help teachers and students transition.
The Role of Teaching in the development of ECRsRob Daley
The document discusses the role of teaching in the development of postgraduate researchers (PGRs). It notes that several reviews since the 1990s have recommended that PGRs receive teaching training and experience. PGRs are involved in a variety of teaching activities, and surveys show over half of PGRs engage in teaching. Teaching experience provides benefits like improved communication and other skills valuable for research and future careers. The document examines frameworks for teaching development and the types of training and support provided to PGRs.
This issue provides you with all you need to know about electronic testing, CXC’s next game changer in examinations
administration. Articles focus on various aspects of e-testing: security, systems requirements, features of the platform, benefits to candidates with special needs and CXC roll-out plans. The issue also reports on the Visual Arts Exhibition in St Lucia, the launch of CAPE Green Engineering syllabus, and performance in the May/June examinations.
Laura Hickle and Sandy Birmingham presented on implementing a community STEM network using a systems approach. Their goals were to help participants understand how to infuse STEM programs into an educational system and make curricular changes. They discussed essential conditions like collaboration, assessment, and engaged communities. Potential partners were identified as schools, community colleges, employers, and organizations. Measures of success included increased funding, prepared workforce, and involvement. Resources for afterschool STEM programs and sustainability strategies were also provided.
Presentation 2
LEBPASS Project - Work package 2
Developing the Lebanese Diploma Supplement Principles and Form (12 - 15 January 2020) in University of Cyprus, Nicosia
This document outlines four approaches for harnessing student power to strengthen Society for Technical Communication (STC) communities: 1) Face-to-face mentoring programs pairing STC professionals with students, 2) Virtual mentoring programs using an online platform, 3) Partnering with an English honors society to recruit student members, and 4) Distributing a comprehensive toolkit on establishing mentoring programs. Presentations and materials are provided to help chapters and special interest groups implement the approaches. The goal is to energize STC through engaging students.
New & Next Webinar Series | Top Facilities and Operations Challenges Facing C...Morgan Noonan
Cushman & Wakefield’s Education Practice Group is a full-service, integrated advisory team focused on real estate solutions for the education sector. Join the Group’s Global Leader, Craig Cassell, as he shares thoughts and ideas on recent trends in the industry regarding enhancing the student experience, driving operational savings, and funding new buildings and renovating existing ones.
The document provides an overview of procurement initiatives and cost-saving strategies across several colleges in the UK. It includes case studies on how individual colleges have collaborated to reduce costs, implemented green energy projects, and benchmarked spending against consortia contracts. The newsletter aims to share best practices and inspire other colleges on procurement projects and simple ways to introduce minor savings. It also provides updates on shared services, announcements, and an online survey for readers.
The document provides guidance for assessors involved in the AoC Beacon Awards assessment process. It outlines a 3-stage process: 1) shortlisting of applications, 2) site visits to shortlisted colleges, and 3) final award decisions. For each stage, assessors complete confidential reports and determine if colleges should progress to the next stage based on how well their submissions meet the general Beacon Award criteria and any specific sponsor criteria. A team of specialist assessors conducts the evaluations, with oversight from a Chief Assessor. The goal is to identify exemplary teaching and learning initiatives across UK colleges that can then be shared more broadly.
This document provides information about organizational changes at Houston Community College (HCC). It outlines a new organizational structure with the goals of improving student satisfaction, empowering divisions, improving communications, and reducing process times. The new structure divides the organization into an instruction division, student services division, finance and administration division, and other supporting divisions. It also outlines changes to restructure the HCC police department to improve services across campuses by implementing 10-hour shifts, centralized communications, and increased supervisor presence in the field. The changes are aimed at benefiting both police and the HCC community.
George Liu has obtained a PhD in Accounting from Waikato Management School in New Zealand. His dissertation focused on improving corporate internet reporting in China. He has since worked as a co-organizer of a research program for New Zealand students to learn about Chinese business culture. Additionally, he co-founded an international trading company between China and New Zealand and gives talks on Chinese business culture for adult education classes.
The document summarizes discussions from a seminar on the future of architectural education. Key points include:
- There was discussion on the purpose of architectural education and ensuring employability amid higher education changes.
- Regulatory bodies like the ARB and RIBA were reviewed in the context of criteria for architectural qualifications.
- Pathways like integrated degrees and apprenticeships were discussed as alternatives to traditional education models.
- Challenges for schools were outlined, such as being competitive and addressing affordability and diversity in programs.
- The school's curriculum review was summarized, which explored more flexible pathways and satisfying new requirements.
- Groups were tasked with discussing related topics and proposing action research projects on issues in
Mahara for practical teaching and learning in an online Theatre Studies progr...Mahara Hui
Presentation by David Matthews and Jayne Richards (Rose Bruford College of Theatre and Performance) at Mahara Hui UK in Southampton, UK, on 10 November 2015.
Recording: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfUVijh6hF8
The document provides an overview of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) including:
- A brief history of the CCSS and how they were developed in a state-led process.
- Key differences between current standards and the CCSS in English Language Arts and math, including a greater focus on non-fiction texts and mathematical practices.
- Challenges and concerns around implementing the new standards, including potential drops in proficiency rates, technology needs, and the time needed for teachers and students to adjust.
- Recommendations for state and local policymakers to create support for the standards and monitor implementation progress over time.
The document summarizes discussions from workshops at an IAU experts' seminar on higher education and education for all in Mozambique. Key issues raised included the unknown and unclear role of higher education in achieving education for all goals, focus on teacher training, obstacles like poor teacher motivation and communications between higher education institutions and ministries. Recommendations focused on sharing information, research collaboration, advocacy, and student involvement to strengthen contributions of higher education and research to meeting education for all targets.
This document provides guidelines for developing case studies about architectural projects. It includes sections on project abstracts, perspectives, analysis, and submission guidelines. The intended purpose is to create a body of knowledge about architecture practice through rigorous case studies. Case studies can be used for education in schools of architecture and continuing education for practitioners. They provide context and lessons about the complexity of projects and decision making in architectural practice.
This document provides an overview of professional learning communities (PLCs) in the expanded learning field based on evaluations of 5 PLC initiatives in Oakland, California supported by the S.D. Bechtel Jr. Foundation over 5 years. PLCs are collaborative groups of professionals that meet regularly to improve their practice through reflection, data review, and strategy sharing. The document finds that PLCs benefit expanded learning program staff, programs, and youth. Staff gain content knowledge and are satisfied with PLCs, programs offer more content-focused activities, and youth receive more exposure to enrichment, though direct youth outcomes are limited. The document outlines best practices for implementing effective expanded learning PLCs including encouraging collaboration, developing participant leadership,
On and off the job: learning experiences, connections and implications for Li...WERDS_NZ
This research project was commissioned by the Joinery Industry Training Organisation (JITO) to understand learning on and off the job, the connections between them, and where learning support (specifically with literacy, language and numeracy) can be provided. Specifically it asks: How do glass apprentices manage formal and informal learning?; how does learning on the first block course support learning on-the-job?; how do apprentices learn on the job and in self-directed study?; how does learning on the job and self directed study support learning on the second block course?; how could learning, and literacy and numeracy development in particular, be strengthened?
Mobilising a nation: RDM education and training in South Africaheila1
Big data; small data; case study; SKA, research data management; university libraries; NeDICC; NRF announcement; UCT, UP, Wits; training intervention; DCC; Carnegie
ESRC Knowledge Brokerage conference: the third sectorKarl Wilding
The panel discussed three approaches to knowledge exchange between academia, policymakers, and practitioners in the third sector. The Third Sector Research Centre aims to bridge gaps and build understanding between these groups to inform policy and practice. Their approach includes establishing advisory boards and reference groups, producing accessible research, and using various dissemination methods. Knowledge exchange partnerships were also discussed as a way to transfer knowledge between universities and organizations while benefiting all parties.
Ontario CIO Shared Service Meeting June 1 2018eCampusOntario
This document provides an agenda and overview for a Shared Services meeting at eCampusOntario. The agenda includes welcoming introductions, discussing eCampusOntario's context and test concepts, collecting thoughts on a test concept, supporting equity and access, discussing a provincial survey structure and communications strategy, measuring sandbox success, and next steps. The overview discusses eCampusOntario's reach across Ontario post-secondary institutions, the principles of extending practice and rethinking as themes to guide program designs, assumptions about openness, examples of open educational resources, and potential benefits and structures for a shared services program.
The document discusses the emerging regulatory environment in higher education in England. It outlines the government's policy drivers of creating a more open, dynamic and affordable system with more competition. It also discusses the challenges of uncertainty around issues like student number controls and future funding. Key projects of the Regulatory Partnership Group are outlined, including developing a new operating framework and financial memorandum to replace HEFCE's and provide accountability for all public funds. The replacement is planned for introduction in autumn 2013 after consultations.
The document provides an overview of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and discusses some of the challenges of implementing them. It notes that 46 states and DC have adopted the CCSS, which are intended to prepare students for college and careers. While the standards emphasize rigor, many students initially scored below proficiency on CCSS-aligned assessments in early-adopting states like Kentucky. Full implementation will require significant investments in technology, curriculum, and professional development to help teachers and students transition.
The Role of Teaching in the development of ECRsRob Daley
The document discusses the role of teaching in the development of postgraduate researchers (PGRs). It notes that several reviews since the 1990s have recommended that PGRs receive teaching training and experience. PGRs are involved in a variety of teaching activities, and surveys show over half of PGRs engage in teaching. Teaching experience provides benefits like improved communication and other skills valuable for research and future careers. The document examines frameworks for teaching development and the types of training and support provided to PGRs.
This issue provides you with all you need to know about electronic testing, CXC’s next game changer in examinations
administration. Articles focus on various aspects of e-testing: security, systems requirements, features of the platform, benefits to candidates with special needs and CXC roll-out plans. The issue also reports on the Visual Arts Exhibition in St Lucia, the launch of CAPE Green Engineering syllabus, and performance in the May/June examinations.
Laura Hickle and Sandy Birmingham presented on implementing a community STEM network using a systems approach. Their goals were to help participants understand how to infuse STEM programs into an educational system and make curricular changes. They discussed essential conditions like collaboration, assessment, and engaged communities. Potential partners were identified as schools, community colleges, employers, and organizations. Measures of success included increased funding, prepared workforce, and involvement. Resources for afterschool STEM programs and sustainability strategies were also provided.
Presentation 2
LEBPASS Project - Work package 2
Developing the Lebanese Diploma Supplement Principles and Form (12 - 15 January 2020) in University of Cyprus, Nicosia
This document outlines four approaches for harnessing student power to strengthen Society for Technical Communication (STC) communities: 1) Face-to-face mentoring programs pairing STC professionals with students, 2) Virtual mentoring programs using an online platform, 3) Partnering with an English honors society to recruit student members, and 4) Distributing a comprehensive toolkit on establishing mentoring programs. Presentations and materials are provided to help chapters and special interest groups implement the approaches. The goal is to energize STC through engaging students.
New & Next Webinar Series | Top Facilities and Operations Challenges Facing C...Morgan Noonan
Cushman & Wakefield’s Education Practice Group is a full-service, integrated advisory team focused on real estate solutions for the education sector. Join the Group’s Global Leader, Craig Cassell, as he shares thoughts and ideas on recent trends in the industry regarding enhancing the student experience, driving operational savings, and funding new buildings and renovating existing ones.
The document provides an overview of procurement initiatives and cost-saving strategies across several colleges in the UK. It includes case studies on how individual colleges have collaborated to reduce costs, implemented green energy projects, and benchmarked spending against consortia contracts. The newsletter aims to share best practices and inspire other colleges on procurement projects and simple ways to introduce minor savings. It also provides updates on shared services, announcements, and an online survey for readers.
The document provides guidance for assessors involved in the AoC Beacon Awards assessment process. It outlines a 3-stage process: 1) shortlisting of applications, 2) site visits to shortlisted colleges, and 3) final award decisions. For each stage, assessors complete confidential reports and determine if colleges should progress to the next stage based on how well their submissions meet the general Beacon Award criteria and any specific sponsor criteria. A team of specialist assessors conducts the evaluations, with oversight from a Chief Assessor. The goal is to identify exemplary teaching and learning initiatives across UK colleges that can then be shared more broadly.
The document summarizes a project by the West Yorkshire Consortium of Colleges to further develop their partnership and explore collaborative models. The project identified two initial areas of focus: joint exam procurement and developing a strategic working relationship with the Leeds City Region Local Enterprise Partnership. The objective was to identify quick wins and strategic interventions to improve skills delivery and support the colleges in meeting current and future demands in the Leeds region. The project progressed the exam procurement collaboration and engagement with the Local Enterprise Partnership to drive skills and employment in the area.
The bulletin announces that the dates for a mayoral candidate hustings event on skills have been postponed to either February 28th or March 2nd due to candidate availability. It also shares that a London Colleges Manifesto outlining priorities will be launched at the event after being printed next week. Additionally, it provides information on upcoming seminars from NIACE to develop frameworks on community engagement for colleges and invites nominations for participants.
The document provides information about sponsorship opportunities for supporting Further Education (FE) colleges in the UK through the Association of Colleges (AoC) Charitable Trust. It describes two award programs - the AoC Beacon Awards which recognize excellence in FE colleges, and the AoC Gold Awards which honor former FE students who have become successful. It also mentions opportunities to sponsor an international mentoring program, research fellowships, student bursaries, and donate to a silent auction. Sponsorship benefits include branding, involvement in events, and opportunities to promote corporate social responsibility.
London Region has over 50 colleges that provide education and training to over 440,000 students each year, offering courses from entry level to higher education as well as apprenticeships. The colleges employ over 31,000 people and had a collective turnover of £1.1 billion in 2009/10. They are actively working with employers and each other to help meet the needs of students and the London community.
This bulletin from the Association of Colleges London Region provides updates on several topics:
- Feedback was positive on the AoC Annual Conference and a policy session will be held regionally.
- The marketing committee received updates on WorldSkills, recruitment, and an upcoming event.
- Details were provided on WorldSkills competitions including an upcoming information session.
- Three London colleges won awards at the TES FE Awards and shared services projects were highlighted.
- Student success stories from Uxbridge College appearing on Channel 4 were featured.
- Recent meetings that took place were listed including with Orchard Hill College and London Councils.
The document discusses four college projects focused on disaster recovery in the cloud. It summarizes each project's goals, approach, and outcomes. Two key projects involved replicating servers in Microsoft Azure (South Tyneside College) and integrating private and public cloud solutions using Amazon Glacier (Walsall College). The document also discusses supplier relationships, delivery models, and project management considerations for disaster recovery in the cloud.
The document provides guidance on applying for the AoC Beacon Awards, which recognize exemplary teaching and learning initiatives. It outlines the application requirements, including that submissions must address specific criteria like benefiting students, promoting equality, and being sustainable. It also provides tips on structuring the application, directions for submitting materials, and answers frequently asked questions. Feedback from previous years emphasizes strengths like partnerships and support for activities, as well as areas for improvement such as providing evidence of innovative practices and learner outcomes.
The document discusses the results of a study on the effects of a new drug on memory and cognitive function in older adults. The double-blind study involved 100 participants aged 65-80 who were given either the drug or a placebo daily for 6 months. Researchers found that those who received the drug performed significantly better on memory and problem-solving tests at the end of the study compared to those who received the placebo.
Strode College introduced 16-19 Study Programmes to balance student effectiveness and college efficiency. While most students study AS/A levels or BTECs, the Level 2 Sport course had declining numbers. Originally delivered in 390 hours over 3 days, students were not full-time and lacked skills. Instead of just adding qualifications or hours, the sport course was redesigned around educational needs - keeping the BTEC but adding multi-sport activities, fitness, and sports leadership to develop students' skills in a local primary school. This ensured an improved educational experience while maintaining resources. College governors approved the new strategic plan after reviewing case studies and financial implications of Study Programmes.
Plymouth College of Art has increased its specialist staffing in maths and English to better support its study programmes across further education qualifications. It embeds maths and English teaching within art-focused subjects through visual assessment grids and suggested activities. Students receive one hour of embedded and one hour of discrete maths or English instruction per week. The college also supports students with dyslexia through screening and ongoing diagnostic analysis to inform teaching strategies. It has strengthened industry links through an employability audit and employer engagement manager to facilitate work-based learning opportunities.
Leicester College is a large further education college in Leicester, England serving over 26,000 learners annually. It restructured its 16-19 study programmes for 2013/14 to maximize student progression to higher education or skilled employment. Study programmes include core qualifications, English, maths, and a personal professional development program focused on employability skills. The personal professional development program includes themed weeks, guest speakers, and "learning coaches" to deliver career-focused content across all subject areas.
Gateway Sixth Form College in Leicester redesigned its curriculum to meet the requirements of Study Programmes and better prepare students for progression to further education or employment. The college increased vocational options and work experience opportunities while retaining academic courses. It also expanded enrichment activities, used online learning more, and strengthened partnerships with employers, schools, and universities to develop qualifications and experiences directly linked to local skills needs. These curriculum changes aim to give students qualifications and skills relevant to today's society and job market.
East Norfolk Sixth Form College has created two student-led Study Programme pathways for students with high needs: 1) a Sports and Hobbies pathway led by a Sports Coach and 2) an Employability and Supported Work Placement pathway led by a Job Coach. These pathways allow students to personalize their curriculum around their needs and interests rather than fitting into a standard curriculum. The pathways provide additional supported hours each week and integrate work placements, helping students gain independence. Initial guidance and flexibility allow students to choose and switch between pathways as needed.
Leeds City College is one of the largest FE colleges in the UK, serving over 40,000 students. It has implemented Study Programs to meet new government requirements, including substantial qualifications, tutorials, work experience, English and maths for 16-19 year olds. The college uses blended learning approaches, including providing students with tablets and online learning materials, to replace some in-person instruction time and allow more flexible self-paced study. Initial pilots showed this approach improved student achievement and motivation without reducing contact hours. The college aims to expand blended learning models across more subjects.
Trafford College has created flexible Study Programmes to meet the needs of diverse learners. Study Programs consist of core qualifications, English and maths, work experience, and enrichment activities. Trafford College ensures its curriculum aligns with key growth areas of the local economy and provides opportunities like Career Academies and work placements to develop employability skills valued by employers. Trafford College also established Trafford First to support student progression into employment or apprenticeships upon completion of their Study Programmes.
Cuando no existían los sistemas de gestión de bases de datos, la información se almacenaba en archivos, lo que causaba problemas como redundancia e inconsistencia de datos, dificultad de acceso y separación de los datos. Los sistemas de gestión de bases de datos (SGBD) resuelven estos problemas al centralizar y organizar los datos de forma sistemática. Un SGBD se compone de módulos como el procesador de consultas, el gestor de la base de datos y el gestor de archivos, y utiliza lenguajes como DDL, DML y D
El cuento narra la historia de un rey que recibió dos halcones para entrenar. Uno respondía bien al entrenamiento, pero el otro no se movía de la rama donde lo dejaron. Nadie pudo hacerlo volar hasta que un campesino cortó la rama y el halcón descubrió que podía volar por sí mismo. El cuento enseña que a veces nos aferramos a cosas que nos impiden progresar y debemos soltarnos para poder volar más alto.
El documento describe la evolución del concepto de tecnología a través de la historia. Comenzó como "técnica", referido a habilidades manuales, y evolucionó para incorporar el conocimiento científico y sistematizar los métodos de producción. En el siglo XVII surgió el término "tecnología" para diferenciar las técnicas tradicionales de las nuevas técnicas basadas en la ciencia. La tecnología se ha entendido de diferentes maneras a lo largo del tiempo, como conocimiento, actividad, objetos
This document discusses a project called MEGS-KT (£71,000) led by Drs Andrea Wheeler and Paul Rowley. The project aims to develop an online continuing professional development (CPD) platform for the energy sector by collaborating with the existing Midlands Energy Graduate School (MEGS) community. The project addresses skills shortages by exploiting synergies between universities and small/medium enterprises. It has engaged industry representatives through workshops and captured lectures. Challenges include losing an IT developer and the need for temporary support to complete a working demonstrator platform.
This document provides an overview of standards and eLearning from the perspective of CETIS (Centre for Educational Technology and Interoperability Standards). It discusses CETIS' role in establishing interoperability specifications and standards to meet the needs of the higher education community. Emerging trends that CETIS is working on include open content, course information standards, widgets, and extending learning environments. The document emphasizes that standards need to be driven by community needs and engagement to support flexibility and interoperability as technologies change over time.
This document discusses the formation of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and the role of Research England within UKRI. Some key points:
- UKRI will bring together existing research councils like the MRC and EPSRC with Innovate UK to form a single funding and innovation agency.
- Research England will focus on research and knowledge exchange funding and policy for higher education institutions in England as part of UKRI.
- Research England aims to create conditions for a healthy research system, provide funding for universities, gather evidence on policy impact, engage with universities, and work closely with devolved administrations.
- UKRI presents opportunities like increased funding and tackling societal challenges, while issues around
Six college projects that received grants to implement new models of delivery are summarized. The projects aimed to create efficiencies through shared services and collaboration. Common stages in the projects included feasibility studies, business cases, and implementation plans. Setting up separate limited companies allowed partnerships to meet legal requirements while limiting liability. Initial outcomes included millions in savings through staff efficiencies and procurement. Deeper benefits included freeing up staff time and improving quality. Future guides and lessons learned will help other colleges.
The CATS project aims to develop a flexible credit-based management curriculum across higher education institutions (HEIs) and further education colleges (FECs) in London to support progression from level 3 to levels 4 and higher. The £78,000 project is funded by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and will run from July 2012 to June 2013. Key deliverables will include articulation agreements between institutions, a flexible management curriculum offer detailing credit, progression and accreditation opportunities, and information materials for students. The project aims to enhance credit transfer and flexibility in management studies to address skills shortages in the sector.
The Efficiency and Innovation Fund (EIF) invested £4.6 million to fund 41 shared services projects across further education (FE) providers in England. The goal was to identify ways to improve back-office functions and services while finding efficiencies. Highlights included Plumpton College's project to develop a regional staffing agency called ERICNational with other FE colleges in Sussex. This reduced costs for part-time staffing and improved response times. It is estimated the EIF projects could collectively save between £30-40 million annually by 2016. While financial savings were a driver, many projects also aimed to enhance the quality of services. The report examines outcomes in areas like recruitment, curriculum, finances, HR, IT
This document discusses online education quality assurance and benchmarking. It provides background on the presenter, Professor Michael Sankey, and the organizations he represents, including Griffith University in Australia and the Australasian Council on Open, Distance and eLearning (ACODE). It outlines different levels of technology-enabled learning and the importance of quality frameworks and standards for online education. It introduces a benchmarking toolkit from the Commonwealth of Learning to help institutions evaluate and improve their technology-enabled learning practices by comparing them to good practices and other institutions. Benchmarking is presented as an important quality assurance method that can identify areas for improvement and facilitate collaboration.
Digital Skills for FAIR and Open Science dri_ireland
As part of a webinar series on Open Research in Ireland, the National Open Research Forum (NORF) presented a webinar focused on skills, incentives & rewards for Open Research on 13 April 2021. This presentation is on the topic of Digital Skills for FAIR and Open Science and was delivered by Iryna Kuchma (Electronic Information for Libraries [EIFL], European Open Science Cloud [EOSC] Working Group on Skills and Training).
Tips on becoming a host for the KNAER's Equity NetworkKNAER-RECRAE
The document provides information about a call for proposals from the Knowledge Network for Applied Education Research (KNAER) to establish a Knowledge Network focused on equity and inclusive education. It outlines the purpose, timeline, eligibility criteria, application process, and key dates. Successful applicants will receive multi-year funding to lead the network and facilitate collaboration between researchers, educators, and community partners to identify evidence-informed practices and reduce barriers to equitable outcomes for all students.
The document discusses the ALTC Good Practice Reports (GPRs) on technology-enhanced learning and teaching. 11 GPRs were commissioned to evaluate outcomes and practices from ALTC projects. The GPR on technology-enhanced learning covered 33 projects and defined technology-enhanced learning as enriching learning experiences and intellectual expression using digital media. It identified 10 outcomes of exemplar projects and provided recommendations for implementing good practices. The Network of Australasian Tertiary Associations aims to integrate and disseminate the GPRs' findings.
AC23 - SFC Kay Guccione and Charlotte Matheson.pdfUKCGE
The Scottish Funding Council (SFC) convened an advisory group to provide recommendations on supporting postgraduate researchers in Scotland. The advisory group discussed several key issues, including how the Research Postgraduate Grant is currently used, developing principles for its accountability, and gathering evidence on equality, diversity and inclusion for postgraduate students. The group aims to enhance collaboration across universities and provide a value-added model for accountability that reduces workload. It will continue meeting through early 2024 to inform SFC's approach to supporting postgraduate researchers.
At the 6th NICE Conference in Bratislava, Slovakia, Gilles Gervais, Programme Manager for Erasmus Plus at the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency of the European Commission, was planning on making a presentation on Knowledge Alliances, a new funding scheme of the European Commission. The presentation, which was due for May 29, 2015, unfortunately had to be cancelled due to a blackout of the Belgian airport system, but the slides were shared with the conference participants. The presentation highlights lessons learned from the first round of applications for KA-projects from 2014. The information shared here is also available through the EACEA's website.
Developing an holistic institutional approach to digital capabilities develop...Jisc
The document discusses developing a holistic institutional approach to digital capabilities at a university. It summarizes the recommendations from an OCIO review, including developing digital capability profiles for students and staff. A scoping group engaged with stakeholders across the university and piloted a digital capabilities framework. Phase two plans include mapping continuing professional development programs to digital capabilities, exploring applying the academic framework to other roles, and reviewing student expectations and opportunities through a student tracker tool. Partnership working, stakeholder engagement, and contextual understanding of digital capabilities are emphasized.
Keynote - Developing a holistic institutional approach to digital capabilitie...Jisc
The document discusses developing a holistic institutional approach to digital capabilities at a university. It summarizes the recommendations from an OCIO review, including developing digital capability profiles for students and staff. A scoping group engaged with stakeholders across the university and piloted a digital capabilities framework. Phase two plans include mapping continuing professional development programs to digital capabilities, exploring applying the academic framework to other roles, and reviewing student expectations and opportunities through a student tracker tool. Partnership working, stakeholder engagement, and contextual understanding of digital capabilities are emphasized.
The document summarizes a conference about new ways of working in the UK's further education sector. It discusses how a committee distributed £6.4 million in funding to support innovative projects among learning providers to save costs and improve efficiency. Several approved projects are highlighted, such as colleges collaborating on examinations or outsourcing back office services. Key lessons from the projects emphasize the importance of leadership, potential savings from collaboration, and addressing issues like value-added tax and organizational sovereignty to enable successful partnerships.
Data-Driven STEM Curriculum Adoption through Inter-Campus Faculty GroupsChristoph Winkler
The document discusses a peer-led STEM adoption model used by the CUNY Institute for Virtual Enterprise. The model is an 8-step process that uses labor market and educational data to identify workforce needs, recommend existing NSF STEM curricula to address gaps, and facilitate faculty-led adoption of curricula through seminars, pairing with content experts, and ongoing support from a project team. The goal is to efficiently match community college STEM programs with modern curricula to meet regional workforce demands.
Oecd norway competence development model final event 9 2020Beatriz Pont
The OECD has engaged with Norway to support the implementation of the competence development model for schools. It is focused on strengthening schools professional learning in partnerships with universities. This powerpoint presents the findings from the OECD report that assesses progress made in the implementation of the model and proposes actions for the model to reach its objectives.
2010-06-30 (UC3M) Sheila MacNeill, CETIS, I jornadas eMadrideMadrid network
This document provides an overview of developments in technology enhanced learning (TEL) in the UK higher education sector from the perspective of JISC CETIS. It discusses the context and mission of JISC CETIS, emerging views of the UK TEL landscape including different models of distributed learning environments, and key programs that JISC CETIS supports related to curriculum design, delivery, and interoperability standards.
VTCT is a specialist awarding organization that has offered world-class vocational qualifications in the UK service sector since 1962, including in areas like hairdressing, beauty therapy, complementary therapies, sports and active leisure, hospitality and catering, business, and more. VTCT qualifications are regulated across the UK and awarded by over 800 approved training centers and colleges internationally. VTCT takes a specialist approach, providing a comprehensive range of qualifications in each subject area along with customer service, training, and online resources to support learners.
This document provides information about the AoC Beacon Awards for 2014/2015, which recognize excellence in further education. It outlines 14 award categories sponsored by various organizations and the criteria for applications. Colleges are invited to apply for awards between July and October 2014 by submitting information about initiatives that promote exemplary teaching and learning. Winning colleges will be announced in November 2014 and receive monetary grants to further develop their initiatives.
This document is an application form for the Beacon Awards, which recognizes initiatives at colleges that promote exemplary teaching and learning. The form requests information about the applicant, their college, the award for which they are applying, and the initiative being submitted. It specifies that the application must be no more than 3,000 words and address criteria including the initiative's aims, how it meets the sponsor's criteria, management, outcomes for learners, and benefits for other colleges. Applicants must submit one copy of Part 1 and five copies each of Parts 2 and 3, including supporting evidence, by July 2nd.
This document is a prospectus for the 2014/2015 AoC Beacon Awards. It outlines 14 award categories that recognize excellence in teaching, learning, leadership, partnerships, and innovation in further education. Winning colleges receive monetary grants between £3,000-£5,000 to continue developing their initiatives. The awards aim to promote sharing of best practices across the further education sector.
The AoC Beacon Awards Programme recognises and promotes collaboration between further education colleges, businesses, and other organizations. The awards highlight innovative teaching practices, support for learners, commitment to diversity, and other contributions colleges make. Winning colleges receive development grants of £3,000-£5,000 to advance their initiatives and share exemplary practices with the sector. A steering group provides guidance for administering the awards program.
OCR is a not-for-profit organization focused on enhancing education through assessment that has supported the AoC Beacon Awards for 21 years. As a leading UK awarding body, OCR engages over 4 million learners in over 8,000 centers to help them achieve their full potential and is one of the top three providers of vocational qualifications. OCR provides an extensive portfolio of skills qualifications beyond A Levels and GCSEs, including apprenticeships, to promote progression and employability through collaboration with industry and education partners.
The National Association for Managers of Student Services (NAMSS) is a membership organization established in 1987 that represents managers of student services in post-16 education. NAMSS has over 320 college members and 700 individual members across England, Scotland, Wales, and North Ireland. NAMSS works with government departments and other stakeholders to represent its members and champion learners. NAMSS holds an annual conference and other events to provide professional development for its members. The NAMSS Award for Student Support recognizes colleges that demonstrate successful and innovative student support through effective leadership, a range of support services, learner engagement, and partnership working.
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - Microlink, AoC Charitable Trust and Achievement f...Association of Colleges
Microlink is Europe's largest supplier of Assistive Technology and Inclusivity solutions, supporting over 180,000 students and numerous FTSE 100 companies over 20 years. Their education services provide teachers resources to create inclusive classrooms allowing students with different learning styles to develop skills and employability. Microlink sponsors the AoC Beacon Awards to recognize exemplary work by colleges in delivering inclusive learning and supporting progression to employment or higher education.
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - Learning Consortium Award for Improvement in Teac...Association of Colleges
The Learning Consortium Award for Improvement in Teaching and Learning through Peer Coaching recognizes colleges that have effectively used peer coaching to significantly impact learners and learning. Assessors will look for evidence that peer coaching has created a focus on learning outcomes and innovative teaching approaches. Successful applications will demonstrate organizational commitment to developing teaching skills through peer coaching, changes to teaching practice that have enhanced the learning experience and led to quantifiable improvements in learner achievement and satisfaction.
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 prospectus - JLT Employee Benefits Award for Health...Association of Colleges
JLT Employee Benefits has been providing healthcare solutions to the education sector since 1981, starting with medical plans for universities and colleges. Their knowledge of the sector's needs combined with products and solutions has grown their reputation. Their healthcare solutions are now integral parts of employee benefits, with most universities and colleges adopting their medical plans. These services go beyond private healthcare to include all aspects of occupational health and employee benefits.
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - Jisc Award for the Effective Use of Technology in FEAssociation of Colleges
Jisc is an organization in the UK that provides digital resources and services to post-16 education and research institutions. It aims to advance the use of digital technologies in these sectors through shared services, content procurement, and expertise. Jisc offers a range of digital content like journals, books, and films through bulk purchasing. It also provides hands-on local support to help institutions operate more efficiently and enable independent learning. Jisc runs the fastest and most efficient academic network in the UK, Janet, which saves members over 25% compared to commercial alternatives.
The document provides guidance on applying for the AoC Beacon Awards, which recognize exemplary teaching and learning initiatives. It outlines the application process and criteria, stating that applications should be submitted in three parts: Part 1 includes college contact details, Part 2 summarizes how the initiative meets criteria in 50-150 words, and Part 3 describes the initiative in no more than 3,000 words, addressing topics like aims, outcomes, and benefits. It emphasizes including evidence from beneficiaries and anonymizing college identities to qualify for consideration.
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - Education and Training Foundation Award for Trans...Association of Colleges
This document provides information about the Education and Training Foundation Award for Transformational Leadership by Governing Bodies. The award recognizes colleges that can demonstrate successful governance through initiatives that improve educational performance, accountability through employer engagement, self-critical governance reviews, or innovative governance processes. Colleges must provide evidence of sustained excellence, strategic partnerships, exemplary teaching and learning, and leadership that promotes diversity.
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - edge award for practical teaching and practical l...Association of Colleges
Edge is an independent education foundation dedicated to raising the status of practical and vocational learning in the UK. It launched the Six Steps to Change Manifesto proposing steps to improve practical and vocational education, such as ensuring all young people learn skills for life/work and allowing students to choose educational pathways matching their aspirations. Edge sponsors the AoC Beacon Award for Practical Teaching and Practical Learning to recognize excellent practical teaching and learning in colleges.
This document outlines the calendar for the 2014-2015 Association of Colleges (AoC) Beacon Awards, which recognizes excellence in further education colleges. It details the distribution and application deadlines in April and July 2014, followed by a three-stage assessment process from July to October 2014. The winning colleges were then announced in November 2014 at the AoC Annual Conference and recognized at local ceremonies from January to April 2015 before delivering breakout sessions at the November 2015 AoC Annual Conference.
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - Association of Colleges Award for College Engagem...Association of Colleges
The Association of Colleges Award for College Engagement with Employers recognizes colleges that deliver responsive skills training to meet employer needs. To win the award, colleges must demonstrate a long-term partnership with employers through curriculum and programs that develop workforce skills. Assessors will look for evidence of a whole-college approach to engaging employers through strategic planning, responsiveness to local economic priorities, collaboration with other organizations, successful delivery of employer engagement programs, and flexible learning methods.
The document outlines the process for assessing applications to the AoC Beacon Awards. It describes that specialist assessors coordinated by the AoC Beacon Awards Director will be responsible for assessing applications. Normally two assessors will review new awards, while established awards can be reviewed by one assessor or an assessor paired with a trainee. The assessment process has three stages - shortlisting applications, visiting shortlisted colleges, and a final decision. Winning colleges are invited to nominate team members to become trained assessors.
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - AQA Award for Continued Engagement in Education a...Association of Colleges
AQA is the largest provider of academic qualifications in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. It provides GCSEs and A-levels for around half of students and its qualifications are recognized internationally in 30 countries. AQA was founded by five universities over a century ago and today employs over 1,200 people who work with teachers and experts to set and mark exams. AQA is a charity that reinvests its profits into education through research and raising standards in assessment worldwide.
This document is an application form for the Beacon Awards. It requests information such as the applicant's name and contact details, the name and contact details of the college, the title and description of the initiative being applied for, and a confirmation that the application meets the word count and criteria requirements. The applicant and college principal must both sign the form to confirm the details and eligibility of the submission. The completed application is to be submitted by July 2nd along with four copies of supporting documents.
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - UCAS Progress Award for Careers Education and Gui...Association of Colleges
UCAS Progress is sponsoring an award that recognizes excellence in impartial careers education, advice, and guidance for young people. The award is open to colleges in the further education sector and will focus on how well colleges engage with schools and employers to provide excellent impartial careers support. Winning colleges will demonstrate effective partnerships with educational institutions and employers, innovative career guidance enabling informed choices, and support to help young people assess career options and overcome barriers to progression.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
Shared Services document
1. NATIONAL LEARNING AND SKILLS COUNCIL
SHARED SERVICES
FURTHER EDUCATION-CENTRIC
Undertaken on behalf of the LSC
by Kathy Bland
March 2010
2. CONTENTS
Pages
Foreword 3
Executive Summary 4-5
A Introduction 6-7
B Background 8
C Research Context 9 - 10
D Definitions of Shared Services and Related Forms
or Structures 11 - 20
E Scope of Possible Shared Services Activity 21 - 23
F Barriers 24 - 31
G Critical Success Factors 32
H Review of LSC Collaboration Fund projects 33 – 36
J Shared Services Development and
Implementation Requirements 37 – 39
K Risk Analysis 40
L Conclusions 41 – 44
M Recommendations and Next Steps 45 – 46
N Postscript 51
Appendices
Appendix 1 Semi-structured questionnaire 47
Appendix 2 Letter to HMRC 48 – 50
Postscript 51
Appendix 3 Stakeholder Groups 52 - 53
Appendix 4 Emerging Models Delegate Exercise 54 - 55
Appendix 5 Business Case Starting Point 56 - 58
Appendix 6 Models – Plus and Minus Exercise 61 - 63
Appendix 7 References 64 - 65
2
3. FOREWORD
Shared Services is an exciting concept. It holds out the possibility of savings for the
Further Education sector, but we must avoid the dangers of not having the resource
and commitment to drive this. Neither should we duplicate Shared Services
projects. This would create waste and limit, rather than maximise, the efficiencies
we all seek.
Angela O’Donoghue
Principal and Chief Executive
City of Sunderland College
3
4. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose
To identify the support required by the Further Education sector to take forward Shared
Services.
Methodology
Secondary research of existing developments and semi structured interviews with
significant Shared Services stakeholders.
Definition
A support service carried out by one organisation on behalf of one or more client
organisations or on behalf of different parts of the same organisation.
Findings
• Much and increasing levels of interest dating back several years
• Several projects supported by the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) with the main
focus on procurement
• Likely that big savings could be made on procurement and IT especially
Barriers to further developments include:
• Perceived threat to independence which prevents necessary collaboration
• Lack of money for capital and revenue investment (or paying back large loans on new
college builds)
• Imposition of VAT which reduces savings
• Competition legislation
• TUPE arrangements
• Change management
Risks
• Not delivering on savings through too many Shared Services projects being started,
meaning further duplication and economies of scale not being realised
Conclusions
• Time is right to develop Shared Services as Colleges need to make savings
• Colleges cannot afford set up costs even though potential for savings is great
• Organisational arrangements must not threaten independence of Colleges.
Therefore, best undertaken by a separate Private Limited Company that is also a
registered charity
• Should cover HR, IT, Finance and Procurement
• Savings best realised by a large organisation that can achieve economies of scale
• Critical success factors include;
o Reduction in cost of at least 10-20%;
o an improvement in service standards in all areas;
o flexibility to provide the required data to the front line in a timely manner;
4
5. o flexibility to respond quickly to changes in requirements from the college or
funders;
o the removal of the overhead required in the management of support staff;
o release of space to provide opportunities for teaching and possible growth.
Recommendations
• External funding should be secured for a broad based Shared Services project
incorporating HR, Finance, Procurement, MIS.
• Project established where costs are lowest, but where there is a likelihood of being
able to recruit appropriately skilled staff
• Initially number of colleges limited to 5 or 6
• Colleges to provide accurate baseline of current costs of potential shared services
• Shared Services Project to work with Colleges to:
o Map key processes in procurement, human resources and finance, as well as
I.T. including Management Information Services
o Develop supporting software, including an overarching relational database that
would link processes
o Identify other projects, such as the joint procurement of human resources
advertising, with which collaboration would produce savings and give a high
priority to such collaboration
o Roll out the project across participating colleges
• Invite other colleges to contract and thereby grow sub-regional to a regional service
• Have this project develop an MIS system to be offered at cost to the entire sector
5
6. A INTRODUCTION
A.1 Purpose
The purpose of this research is to identify the support required by the Further
Education sector to take forward a Shared Services model (or models) and to
identify gaps in current support arrangements.
A.2 Objectives
The specific objectives of this research were agreed with Ray Poxon, then with
the Learning Skills Council, in January 2010. These objectives were agreed:
To describe possible Shared Services organisational models that will include
scope in relation to work streams, sector and geographical locations
To describe what is currently happening in the further and higher education
sector in relation to Shared Services
Summarise the current Shared Services plans and ambitions of stakeholders
active, specifically in the further education sector, and describe the key issues
and solutions
Review the project reports from the Learning and Skills Council Collaboration
Fund Projects and describe the successes/barriers
To provide recommendations about the support required by the further
education sector in the short (March 2011) and longer terms (next 3 years) for
the implementation of Shared Services
The fieldwork and secondary research was conducted from 25 February 2010 to
31 March 2010. Writing up was completed in time for a conference to be held in
Sheffield on 21 April 2010.
A.3 Research Scope
Resource availability limits all research. To make this particular project
manageable in the tight timeframe adopted, it was agreed that the scope and
coverage of this FE focused research would be:
• The collation of views of a selection of key Government stakeholders, senior
management of two colleges in North East England and interviews with
members of the Collaboration Fund Initiative sponsored by the Learning and
Skills Council (LSC).
• A description of relevant collaborative projects in England and Northern
Ireland.
• Description and analysis of Shared Services in Further Education, whilst also
touching upon higher education.
• Description and analysis of various collaborative models
The research would therefore cover a period from the inception of the National
Advisory Group for Shared Services in 2006 through to developments up to the
spring of 2010.
6
7. Key stakeholders known to be active in Shared Services in the Further and Higher
education sectors and therefore included in the scope of this research are:
• The Learning and Skills Network (LSN)
• The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC)
• The Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS)
• The Department for Children Schools and Families (DCSF)
• The Association of Colleges (AoC)
• The 157 Group
• The Association of Northern Ireland Colleges (ANIC)
• South Eastern Regional College (Northern Ireland)
• FE Sussex
• The Association of Colleges in the Eastern Region (ACER)
• The Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE)
• Shared Service Architects
• The Learning and Skills Improvement Service (LSIS)
• The Lakes College (small GFE)
• Leicester College (very large GFE)
• Cardinal Newman College (small 6th Form)
A.4 Research Methodology
The approach taken in carrying out this research has been to:
a) Carry out in-depth, semi structured interviews with key stakeholders.
(Appendix 1)
b) Undertake desktop research in particular in relation to the Learning and
Skills Council Collaboration Fund Projects as well as a range of other
available information
c) Look in particular at a case study of two further education colleges working
collaboratively to try and take a Shared Services model forward
The author of this report has also been involved in further work that has in effect
become action based research. This has centred on work that has been carried
out between City of Sunderland College and South Tyneside College in relation to
developing a business case for Shared Services between the two colleges, but
which could quickly be scaled up to a sub-regional and or even possibly regional
level.
7
8. B BACKGROUND
B.1 In part this work stems from and attempts to build on work undertaken by the
Learning and Skills Shared Services programme during 2006 to 2007. An
advisory group developed a vision for a model of Shared Services and a strategic
business case. They also provided advice on a proposed Shared Services
Capability that would deliver transactional, administrative and advisory services to
colleges and providers across the Learning and Skills sector.
B.2 This model for Shared Services in the Learning and Skills sector was intended to
provide a basis for discussion with key stakeholders. Several key challenges
emerged from the meetings of the National Advisory Group. VAT implications,
Information Technology platforms and Governance were major issues together
with the proposed size of an ideal Shared Services business solution. The
Cabinet Office representative of the Advisory Group said that there would need to
be 20,000 staff to begin to establish a Shared Services capability and over 50,000
staff before the realisation of significant cost reductions. They based this
judgement on other Shared Services projects that they had led on in Australia.
B.3 The strategic business case indicated that there was around an annual £100m of
in-scope (Finance, HRM, MIS) activity that could be transferred to a Shared
Services project.
B.4 Post 2007, neither the Shared Services Blueprint, nor the Strategic Business
Case, was taken forward. No reasons have been provided for this. All involved in
steering the project have since moved on. The project may have been too
ambitious. The aspiration of 25% of the sector being involved initially and quickly
rising to 100%, may have been unrealistic particularly when bearing in mind the
considerable issues mentioned in B.2 above. Another possibility was that the
efficiencies that Shared Services could bring did not get high enough up the
agenda of individuals and organisations. It may also have been the case that
collaboration between colleges was simply too complex and difficult for such a
project to be successfully implemented, given that colleges guard their
independence jealously. Whatever the reason the initiative failed to reach the
implementation phase and therefore never tested the considerable challenges
that would have been encountered therein.
8
9. C RESEARCH CONTEXT
C.1 In trying to understand the breadth and scope of opportunity that exists for the
deployment of models of Shared Services, it is necessary to understand the range
of college sizes and numbers of colleges that fall within each category. Table A
provides a breakdown of the current (2010) total number of colleges in England
according to the National Audit Office (2006) categorisation:
Table A
NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE CATEGORIES
Very Large Turnover more than £35m 37 Colleges 10% of the sector
Large Turnover between £25m - £35m 60 Colleges 17% of the sector
Medium Turnover between £15m - £25m 96 Colleges 27% of the sector
Small Turnover less than £15m 165 Colleges 46% of the sector
C.2 Almost three quarters of the sector is categorised as small to medium. There are
165 colleges, including 6th form colleges, which have a turnover less than £15m
(LSC college accounts 2007-2008).
C.3 Government cuts in funding for Further Education could be in the region of 20 per
cent over the next three years and this may turn out to be a causal factor in
reducing the number of colleges, especially in the small to medium sized
categories. A report produced by KPMG for the LSC stated that around 50
general further education (GFE) colleges are “currently designated as struggling”,
and a further 50 colleges were classed as “breaking even” but are “financially
vulnerable” over the next three years. The report goes on to say that 100 GFE
colleges are described as “sound”, a further 45 categorised as being good or
outstanding. Of the 45 in this classification, 15 had significant cash reserves and
a “predatory” vision when looking at weaker providers.
C.4 In a report commissioned by the 157 Group, ‘Preparing Colleges for the Future’,
Eversheds LLP (an international law firm) envisage that collaborations by way of
joint ventures, cost-sharing vehicles, outsourcing and the like will become
common features of the sector.
C.5 The report also states that FE colleges need to prepare for the future in radical
new ways to ensure sustainability and continued excellence of the vital services
provided to employers, local communities and students (Frank McLoughlin,
Chairman 157 Group).
9
10. C.6 This research is also carried out against a backdrop of a widespread belief that
the public sector in general can make huge efficiency savings without impacting
frontline services.
The Institute of Directors reinforced their belief in this respect when they issued a
report (March 2010) criticising public sector spend asserting that at least £25bn of
annual efficiencies can be made in the public sector within three years through a
radical restructuring of public sector procurement (£15bn saving) and greater use
of Shared Services and outsourcing (£10bn saving).
The report, ‘Towards Tesco – improving public sector procurement’ has much in
common with other articles on the same subject matter. It is something of a
surprise that the paper uses banks as examples of operational efficiency but the
author’s point that many functions being designed over and over again by public
sector organisations largely carrying out the same job is an important one.
Such duplication in systems development is undoubtedly costly. Policies have to
be written, processes mapped and procedures, guidance and work instructions
drafted. Supporting IT systems then need to be put in place. To do this over and
over again across the country and in different colleges does seem wasteful in the
extreme. Whether or not this would happen in the private sector is, in some ways,
irrelevant. The fact remains that it is an example of an inefficiency and one that
models of Shared Services would set out to address to a greater or lesser degree
depending on the size of the project.
C.7 This paper will go on to explore how further education colleges can collaborate to
make efficiencies and, as important, be sustainable and retain their independence
so that they can continue to do what the Chair of the 157 Group stated in
paragraph C.5 of this paper.
10
11. D DEFINITIONS OF SHARED SERVICES AND RELATED
FORMS OR STRUCTURES
D.1 The term ‘Shared Services’ has become widely used in the public sector during
the past 12 to 18 months. Numerous Government circulars, White Papers as well
as press reports mention Shared Services possibilities. For example, Delivering
14-19 Reform talks about a ten year programme that aims to transform the
services and the pooling of resources and facilities to deliver a more responsive
service and economies of scale over time (DCSF, 2009).
D.2 The Head of the Government’s education technology body, BECTA, reported to
The Times Educational Supplement that there are few examples of FE colleges
and providers working to share services, but formally there is very little readily
available evidence of Shared Services in FE.
D.3 There would therefore appear to be opportunities here and, whilst there may be
barriers to overcome, the current funding constraints in the FE sector mean that it
is essential that a way forward can be found if the contribution of savings from
Shared Services is not to be lost.
D.4 Colin Cram, a public sector procurement specialist, has said that the case for
Shared Services is self-evident. There is widespread support for the view that a
Shared Services solution would bring huge savings, and yet only a small
proportion of front and back office services are delivered this way. Before going
on to examine why this is the case it is essential that a working definition of the
term ‘Shared Services’ should be arrived at, one that is wide enough in scope to
allow all models to be included.
D.5 The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) commissioned Duke & Jordan to
carry out a Study of Shared Services in UK Further and Higher Education, which
was published during 2008. JISC’s understanding of the term Shared Services
was summarised as “institutions co-operating in the development and delivery of
services, so sharing skills and knowledge, perhaps with commercial participation”.
D.6 PricewaterhouseCoopers define Shared Services as “The concentration of
company resources performing like activities, typically spread across the
organisation, in order to service multiple internal partners at lower cost and with
higher service levels, with the common goal of delighting external customers and
enhancing corporate value”.
D.7 The National Advisory Group put forward the definition, “Shared Services is a
business model whereby multiple organisations converge and streamline some of
their business functions in order to deliver services as effectively and efficiently as
possible. It often involves creating a stand-alone organisation whose sole
objective is to process the high volumes of administrative ‘back office’
transactions that are common to each organisation” (LSC, 2006).
11
12. D.8 However, definitions of Shared Services vary and it is perhaps useful to see the
various models placed along a continuum of collaboration. BuyIT Best Practice
Network began to identify types of shared service arrangements that have been
adapted by early adopters of Shared Services in Government. The Shared
Services Advisory Group identified several basic forms or structures that can be
applied to shared service operations in the public sector:
• “Unitary – a single organisation consolidating and centralising a business
service.
• Lead department – an organisation consolidating and centralising a business
service that will be shared by other organisations.
• Joint Initiative (internal) – an agreement between two or more organisations to
set up and operate Shared Services.
• Strategic partnership (external) – contractual arrangement with a third party
provider for a range of services which may include Shared Services.
• Joint venture – joint venture legal entity between ‘Authority’ and third party
provider.
• Outsourcing – third party provider takes full responsibility for managing and
operating the service.”
D.9 There are three further structures that could be applicable to the further education
sector that need to be added, namely:
• Merger – this is where one organisation acquires another organisation (also
referred to as a ‘take over’).
• Federation – this is where member organisations unite forming a central
governance, but each member organisation still retaining control of its own
internal affairs.
• Commissioning – this is the joint procurement of services (and goods) based
on a shared strategy.
D.10 These structures have been put on a continuum (see Chart A) that shows
possible levels of collaboration together with issues of control and risk/barriers.
Collaboration will be most apparent with the Lead Department, Joint Initiative,
Commissioning, Strategic Partner, Federation and less likely with Unitary, Merger
and Outsource:
12
13. Chart A
Continuum of Collaboration and Control
Significantly less control
more risk/barrier
Third party provider takes full responsibility for
Outsource
managing and operating services.
Member organisations operate within a shared governance
Federal Structure umbrella. Each organisation retains independent legal
status, but are fully accountable via local boards to federal
governance structures.
A contractual arrangement with a third party provider to
Strategic partner provide Shared Services (eg, College A and a Private
Company)
Joint procurement of services based on a shared strategy and
harmonised business processes and designed to provide shared
Commissioning service provisions to its members (eg, the LSC Collaboration Fund
projects were mainly focused on this model)
An agreement between two or more organisations to set up
Joint Initiative and operate Shared Services (eg, College A and College B
establish a separate Shared Services department)
Centralising a business service that will be shared by other
Lead Department organisations (eg, College A shares Finance with College B;
College B shares HRM with College A)
Merger The acquisition of one college by another (eg, Newcastle College
Greater control less
acquiring Skelmersdale College)
risk/barrier
A single organisation centralising business services (157 Group
Unitary Colleges would generally do this)
13
14. D.11 This continuum illustrates the degree of control a college would have over a type
of shared service operation and the degree of risk and/or barrier in relation to
VAT implications, competitions legislation, TUPE and pensions.
D.12 Most of the definitions put forward for Shared Services have tended to focus on
the aim. For the purposes of this work the definition of Shared Services will be
very simple but will encompass a description, aim and characteristics, as is
shown below:
Shared Service definition
A support service carried out by one organisation on behalf of one or more
client organisations or on behalf of the various parts of a single organisation.
The aim of Shared Services is:
To improve service quality and to reduce costs.
Characteristics of Shared Services initiatives can include:
Shared technological platforms
Shared and common processes
Routine, though not necessarily simple, tasks
Tasks carried out remotely
High degree of automation
Shared need for service from all partner organisations
Variable transactional volume from each member organisation but high
transactional volume overall
Capable of being replicated
Greater or lesser degrees of collaboration
D.13 Each of the 8 structures outlined in Chart A will be sketched out more fully below
and some of the advantages and disadvantages explored.
• UNITARY MODEL
D.14 The Unitary model is a single organisation that centralises its back office services.
There are numerous examples of this model in both the private and public
sectors. The model is much more likely to be adopted in larger and/or
geographically more dispersed organisations.
There are examples of the Unitary model in the 157 Group of colleges.
Newcastle College which has formulated a ‘Group’ entity comprising Newcastle
College, Skelmersdale College and Carter and Carter, has a specific unit in their
City Centre Campus called ‘Shared Services’ which centralises the College’s
Group finances and HRM functions. City of Sunderland College has 5 centres
across the four quarters of the City with each centre separated by several miles.
Services such as HRM, MIS (students), Finance and Estates are centralised at
one of the major campuses.
14
15. This model looks to avoid duplication. Obviously, the organisations retain
complete independence and thus avoids issues such as VAT, TUPE and
competitions law because it is one single organisation that has moved to a
centralised model.
The major disadvantage with this model is the ‘corporate take it or leave it’
mentality towards the business unit partners that can develop as they are, in
effect, captive customers. It is fairly common practice in these types of
organisations for corporate management to insist that business unit management
use the shared service. Business unit managers can feel powerless to influence
the quality of services provided especially where the organisation is
geographically widely distributed. The scale of operation when applied to the
further education sector is likely to be limited in relation to generating efficiencies.
• MERGERS
D.15 Mergers occur when one organisation acquires another. Again, there are
numerous examples of mergers (also referred to as take-overs) in both the private
and public sectors. An example in the public sector is Hull College acquiring
Harrogate College.
This model operates under a single governance or group structure. It offers the
opportunity to reduce the potential for duplication and avoids complex issues such
as VAT and competitions law, just as in the Unitary Model described above.
Independence of the acquired organisation is normally ‘subsumed’ over a period
of time into the parent organisation. The merging of organisational structures and
processes is fairly straightforward with such a model.
However, the culture changes can take many years and will be very complex,
especially where the mergers are between more than two organisations. An
example of this is the merger of 16 colleges down to 6 in Northern Ireland, a
process which began in 2007. One of the colleges involved and which was visited
by the author of this report in both 2007 and 2010 (North Ards and Downs) had
merged with Bangor College and Lisbon College. The 3 colleges were re-named
‘South Eastern Regional College’. However, each of the 3 colleges are still
‘known’ by their original name. The 16 College Principals and strategic
management for Finance, HRM and IT rationalised down to 6. Opportunities for
further rationalisation do not appear to have been taken despite all being moved
onto the same technological platform.
Mergers tend to happen between two or three organisations and can be very
complex and time consuming to manage especially if the organisations are
geographically dispersed. Whilst there are efficiencies to be gained, they are
likely to be fairly small scale.
15
16. • LEAD DEPARTMENT
D.16 The Lead Department is where one college may specialise in, for example,
finance, and this is then shared by other colleges. Unsurprisingly, there are not
many examples of this model in the public sector as there is an immediate VAT
levy, not to mention a loss of ‘control’ from the receiving organisations
perspective. There are also issues of the providing organisation’s personnel
having a natural bias and affinity in favour of their employers. Other issues arise
in relation to memorandum of understanding, charges and exit arrangements. It
does mean that each organisation can retain its independence. The scale of
operation is likely to be small, perhaps involving only a handful of colleges, and
therefore efficiencies and associated savings limited.
• JOINT INITIATIVES
D.17 Joint initiatives are where an agreement between two or more organisations is
established to set up and operate Shared Services. This is what City of
Sunderland College and South Tyneside College are attempting to establish.
Again, the author has found few examples of this type of arrangement in the
further education sector primarily because of VAT implications, but perhaps also
because of the competitive nature of further education colleges. This model also
requires a greater degree of collaboration between organisations and trust must
be established, but it does mean that each organisation retains full independence.
Issues of governance, memoranda of understanding, charges and exit
arrangements also need to be addressed.
It may be easier to begin to formulate this agreement when the respective
organisations are geographically closer to each other. As with other models, this
is not likely to realise significant efficiencies until a critical mass is established.
• COMMISSIONING
D.18 Commissioning, as in the joint procurement of services, is something that featured
strongly in section H in the research carried out on the LSC Collaboration Fund
Projects. There are numerous highly successful collaboration arrangements
across the country that have benefited from the project funding.
The majority of projects focused on the ‘joint’ appointment of a procurement
professional who worked for several colleges in a geographical area. Each
‘bidding’ organisation directly employed the procurement manager who then
works ‘across’ each of the collaboration organisations. Obviously, all
organisations in this collaborative model retain their independence.
Whilst under the project specification, there are no VAT implications because the
funding has gone to one nominated college. Once the funding is exhausted, each
organisation will be expected to pay a proportion of the procurement manager
salary and if the contract of employment is retained by the ‘host’ organisation then
VAT levies will apply. There is a further option whereby the appointment is
‘shared’ though this could result in significant bureaucracy and difficulties with
‘accountability/performance management’.
16
17. A further proposition is being ‘tested’ out in connection with providing the services
through ‘membership’ fees through a charitable organisation such as ACER. This
model does seem appropriate to be scaled up to sub-regional, regional and even
supra-regional levels and, therefore, greater efficiencies can be realised.
• STRATEGIC PARTNER
D.19 Strategic partner can be illustrated by the National Health Services (NHS) model
for Shared Services in finance and payroll. This is where there is a public/private
partnership for the delivery of Shared Services. The partnership can be equal
(50/50) or some other permutation of this. The NHS model was first established
by the Department of Health (DoH) to try and persuade Trusts to share services,
though with modest success. The DoH decided that a public/private partnership
would encourage more Trusts to join and therefore went through EJEU to secure
private investment in a 50/50 joint venture.
It has taken several years to firstly get more Trusts to join the scheme and
secondly make a financial return. In the case of the NHS, VAT on business
services can be recovered in certain instances and this scheme is a case in point.
Being able to recover the VAT has certainly helped this scheme.
• FEDERATION
D.20 The Federation model is where member organisations operate within a shared
governance umbrella. The Federation of Education Business Link Consortia is an
example where the responsibility for providing strategic coherence across an area
in the support of links between schools/colleges and local employers rests with
the 47 Education Business Links Consortia. Organisations retain independent
legal status and local discretion on business opportunities, but are accountable
via local boards to federal governance structures. This model may offer greatest
appeal to those organisations that are small to medium in size.
An example could be the Cumbrian Colleges that have established collaborative
examples such as the Limited Company that they formed as a Joint Venture
several years ago for employer engagement provision. Perhaps more importantly
the colleges are a similar size and geographically far enough away from each
other for them not to be in direct competition, but close enough, to share services.
Nevertheless, the total income of the four Cumbrian Colleges at circa £35m is not
likely to realise significant efficiencies in absolute terms, unless other colleges can
be persuaded to take part. In addition, whilst each College will retain operational
independence, there may be tensions with strategic direction being derived from
the federation board. Decision making at board level could also prove
problematic with Principals not being able to agree strategy.
As with the other models, the memorandum of understanding, VAT levy,
TUPE/pensions, entry and exit arrangements will be issues that have to be dealt
with.
17
18. • OUTSOURCING
D.21 Outsourcing to a third party provider who takes full responsibility for the
management and operation of services. There are many private and public
examples of outsourcing. Across England, there are a significant number of
colleges who have outsourced payroll, refectories, cleaning, security and
information technology.
It would appear that to date, no college has outsourced management information
of students, finance, human resources, estates or health and safety
management. Though outside the scope of this research, the author has come
across some evidence of using outsourcing to ‘offload’ staff that are thought of as
being problematic. However, outsourcing does not necessarily fit with Shared
Services needs. The sharing of technological platforms and processes necessary
for Shared Services is not an integral feature of outsourcing and, therefore, will
not be explored in any further detail for the purposes of this report.
There are numerous Shared Services definitions available, but
typically they all seem to point to models of providing services that
share the same technological interface and processes for identified
work streams. Outwith Unitary and Merger, the rest of the models
all have the same issues and barriers to address in the form of
Constitution, VAT levy, TUPE/pensions, entry and exit
arrangements. It is important to take account of developmental and
transitional change, which is a necessary part of Shared Services
implementation.
Each of the Shared Services model structures offers a different
approach. In deciding on the best model, the desired level of
control and collaboration have to be determined.
D.22 A seminar event was held in April 2010 to disseminate the findings of this report to
the stakeholders identified in Section A.3 (page 7).
D.23 Delegates at the event were asked to work in groups to discuss the collaboration and
control models described in Section D and to complete a scoring table to rank each
of the models in relation to critical success factors (see page 32 for definition of
critical success factors) such as low risk, high level of control, ease of collaboration,
low cost, high quality and flexibility. The higher the score for each of the models in
accordance with critical success factors, the more desirable the Shared Services
model. (Appendix 4).
18
19. D.24 Total scores were collected from each group and placed in the following table in
ascending order:
Table B
GROUP GROUP B GROUP C TOTAL
A SCORE
UNITARY 49 50 49 148
MERGER 50 50 45 145
JOINT INITIATIVE 42 43 45 130
STRATEGIC PARTNER 49 38 41 128
COMMISSIONING 42 33 39 121
LEAD DEPARTMENT 45 21 48 114
OUTSOURCE 49 29 26 104
FEDERAL 11 47 35 93
D.25 The above results were presented to the seminar for general discussion. Unitary,
Merger and Joint Initiative, came out with the highest scores. The last three models
(Lead Department, Outsource, Federal) had widely varying scores between the
groups. One of the explanations provided for this was in relation to interpretation.
For example, the Outsource model for Group A where the score was very high
assumed good contract specification with flexibility and lead people that would
manage the process. The other groups did not make these assumptions.
D.26 Delegates were asked how easy they found the exercise. Most people found the
definitions too narrow in supporting their ability to complete the scoring template and
also confusing in relation to the titles (eg, Joint Initiative internal and Strategic
Partner external). As a result of this, the ‘internal’ and ‘external’ tags have been
removed to eliminate confusion.
D.27 To further build on this exercise, delegates were asked to focus on the plus and
minus factors of each of the models and to use post-it slips on flipcharts to provide
qualitative input (Appendix 6)
D.28 Interestingly, whilst delegates reported that they found the definitions too narrow in
relation to the scoring exercise, it would appear from the qualitative exercise that
followed and the results in Appendix 6 that they have a good understanding of the
potential plus and minus points for each respective model.
D.29 Where the Unitary, Merger and Joint Initiative models scored highly in the
quantitative exercise, the qualitative statements clearly identify them as least
‘threatening’ and minimal efficiency returns. The Commissioning model also seemed
to be a more ‘acceptable’ way forward.
19
20. D.30 Lead Department, Outsource and Federal seemed to be the least popular both in
terms of quantitative and qualitative outcomes.
D.31 Whilst Strategic Partner ranked in the middle of the scoring exercise, the qualitative
statements reveal interesting points such as “innovation, increase capacity of
technological knowledge, whole greater than sum of parts”.
When this work on preferred models is cross-tabulated with the work on critical
success factors (see page 32), the Joint Initiative model is probably the highest
ranking. This model seemed to have the highest preference rating coupled with a
high probability of delivery savings.
20
21. E SCOPE OF POSSIBLE SHARED SERVICE ACTIVITY
E.1 During November 2009, a workshop was held between a private Shared Services
organisation, a change management organisation and the City of Sunderland
College to identify and scope the areas that would be most appropriate for a
Shared Services solution. The starting point for the scoping exercise was to
identify the attributes that make a process a good candidate to transfer. The three
main attributes that the workshop arrived at were:
• Is it repeatable?
• Can it be rules based and automated?
• Can it be done remotely?
E.2 The areas of service provision that were identified that had a ‘best fit’ with these
attributes were:
Human Resource Management
Finance
Student Services (Educational Maintenance Allowance processes)
Safeguard (Trip Management processes)
Safeguarding Checks and Data Management
E.3 The areas of service provision that could be considered in the future were thought
to be:
Parts of Academic Registry
Continuous Professional Development
Data Unit
Quality Assurance Administration
Reprographics procurement
Archiving (Electronic Document Management)
Examinations
Governance
Customer Relationship Management
E.4 In carrying out this research the areas identified above have been linked to the
specific processes. Table C shows major work streams and shows some of the
processes that could be in a Shared Services model:
21
22. Table C – Possible work streams and processes
FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION PROCUREMENT
TECHNOLOGY
Accounts Payable Recruitment Server Support Single procurement
Accounts Receivable Administration: Desktop Support system
Sales Invoicing Candidate Applications Network Support Preferred supplier list
General Ledger Interviews Application Support E-procurement
Accounting and Offers Project Management Tendering framework
Financial Reporting CRB agreements dev and
Fixed Assets/Asset Acceptances Examinations operation
Accounting Administration: P card administration
Tax Training Administration: Registrations Efficiency
Treasury Course offers Timetables Measurement Model
Management Delegate attendance Candidate notifications monitoring
Financial Planning (examination dates and
(budget setting, Exits: results)
monitoring) Voluntary Results data input
Internal Audit Involuntary
Management of
Finance Team Payroll and Benefits:
IT Operations Payslips
Employee records
Updates
Benefits and
Pension Admin
Pay Reviews
Employee Relations:
Maternity/Paternity
Disciplinary
Grievance
Domestic relocation
Expatriation /
Repatriation
General HR
Advisory Absence
Performance Management
and Appraisal:
Reporting and
Analysis
IT Operations System
HR Vendor Management
and Procurement
22
23. E.5 There is generally a feeling amongst those participating in this research that:
• Each of the major work streams within a Shared Services project need to have
a strong professional in each field providing leadership and direction to the
people charged with delivering the processes.
• The processes themselves need to be ‘world class’ and the culture one of
continuous improvement.
• Clear accountabilities need to be drawn up together with service level
agreements for each participating organisation.
• There needs to be regular contact and accountability meetings between
deliverer and service user to help ensure the highest quality service provision
at all times. Output from these meetings should include improvement actions
that need to be taken.
• Colleges need to retain high level strategic leadership and expertise within
each of the work streams.
E.6 Again, in relation to adding further validity to the findings in this research,
delegates at the Seminar event in April 2010 were asked to individually list what
they would include in the scope for shared services. The same kind of generic
areas such as HR, Finance, Procurement, ICT. One respondent wrote, “anything/
everything”. Another included, “Defined software that all use 1 finance system,
invoice processing, management accounts, recruitment, HR advice/Legal advice/
marketing support/Project Management – bulk buying – fewer suppliers! Across
sector – paper is paper”.
23
24. F BARRIERS
F.1 Very similar issues and barriers emerged from a wide range of respondents in
relation to Shared Services plans and aspirations. The main areas highlighted
from respondents were VAT, TUPE/Pensions, Competitions Law, Management of
Information Systems (MIS), Transition-Related Human Resources management
and collaboration. The findings are summarised as follows:
• VAT
F.2 All respondents said that the imposition of VAT would be a major barrier, if not a
project killer. One Government respondent reported that he had thought the issue
was resolved during 2007 when, new to his position, he had been asked to take
up the issue of VAT with Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) who had
then taken the matter to Treasury. However, the Treasury stated that VAT would
apply to Shared Services in both Higher and Further Education.
F.3 The Association of Colleges in the Eastern Region (ACER) believe that there is a
solution to the VAT imposition in relation to the way the Company is formulated
(eg, Charitable, non-profit making organisation). Whilst this would perhaps help
meet the requirements of competition law, it is not clear how this would meet VAT
requirements. ACER have commissioned a VAT expert who has suggested that a
way to avoid the VAT levy would be to offer Shared Services through membership
fees. It is not clear why this would work. Clubs pay VAT if they cross the
threshold. This needs to be tested and clarified with HMRC.
F.4 Both the Learning and Skills Network (LSN) and the 157 Group reported that
Eversheds had been commissioned to explore the VAT and competitions law
issues. The 157 Group report, Preparing Colleges for the Future (January 2010)
talks of collaborative models for further education colleges, short of merger as
referenced in the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (2008)
document, Further Education Colleges – Models for Success. However, it would
appear that there is limited evidence that this has been widely adopted or that
VAT can be avoided in this way.
F.5 The 157 Group report goes on to talk about section 166 Education and
Inspections Act 2006 whereby colleges have the power to delegate parts of their
core functions to a joint committee with another institution. There are examples,
albeit on a small scale, developed by the establishment of both the ACER and FE
Sussex who have focused on procurement of goods and services. Section H
(below) also talks about Collaboration Projects illustrating how colleges have
worked together that have been financially supported by the LSC.
F.6 In relation to VAT, the report goes on to specify that the current tax rules do not
help the further education sector when considering either outsourcing or sharing
of services; both create an irrecoverable VAT cost to the recipient of the service.
It goes on to give an example in the NHS sector and the barriers experienced
resulted in the creation of “contracted out services provisions to allow for VAT
recovery on certain defined outsourced services traditionally performed in-house”.
Section 6.2.4 of the report goes on to state that, “As regards the sharing of
services in isolation, the European VAT Directive provides for exemption in
respect of service sharing at cost between entities carrying VAT exempt
activities”, but this seems to be a ‘what ought’ to happen. This, therefore, still
leaves the VAT issue unresolved. However, Eversheds believe that they have a
24
25. strong case to present to HMRC in relation to the European VAT Directive and the
outcome of this work is awaited with interest.
F.7 LSN did not feel able to share their findings due to commercial constraints.
F.8 From both desktop research and interviews into the inhibitors of Shared Services,
it would appear that funding bodies and Government officials have made
extensive representations to both HMRC and the Treasury about the issue of a
VAT levy for joint venture shared service business solutions over a timescale
spanning several years. The conclusion appears to be that there will be no
concessions and that VAT will be levied. KPMG have also tested out this
proposition specifically for this project and their findings are:
KPMG Findings on VAT
“Under UK VAT legislation and HMRC’s current interpretation of European VAT
legislation, the structure (ie, a new entity providing ‘Shared Services’ to the
Colleges in relation to Finance, HR, IT and MIS) would create additional VAT
costs for the Colleges. The supplies of these Shared Services to the Colleges
would be subject to VAT, which would be largely irrecoverable. Currently these
services are operated in house, and therefore, the taxable supply from the new
entity is generating additional irrecoverable VAT for the Colleges which would
obviously diminish any cost savings to be derived from sharing these costs.
KPMG has been in discussions with HMRC and the Treasury in relation to the
potential for VAT exemption to be applied to cost sharing arrangements, as scope
exists within EU law for certain cost-sharing activities between not-for-profit
bodies to be treated as exempt. In last week’s budget the Government made the
following announcement confirming that it will work with charities and other
affected sectors to consider the potential for introducing such an exemption into
UK law:
“The Government recognises the efficiencies that can be achieved by
organisations such as charities sharing services and the potential VAT barrier
that exists. The Government will work with charities and other affected sectors to
consider options for implementing the EU cost sharing exemption.”
F.9 The Higher Education Funding Council, together with KPMG, have been looking
at ways to remove the VAT burden so as to facilitate a move to a Shared Services
solution. Examples have been provided of Universities and Colleges working
together by forming regional purchasing consortia to help drive down procurement
costs across a range of expenditure categories including stationery, catering
goods and computing. A recent announcement in Revenue and Customs Brief
09/10 HMRC has revised its policy on the VAT treatment of companies owned or
25
26. controlled by universities that are engaged in the delivery of university level
education leading to a qualification. The policy change is being introduced as, “A
review of the VAT treatments of supplies of university level education delivered by
companies owned or controlled by universities has highlighted inconsistencies
between previous policy and VAT case law. This policy change is being
introduced to address this, and to ensure that similar supplies are treated in the
same way by all universities”.
F.10 The following is a case study of a University and College collaborating from 2001.
It demonstrates the importance of not entering into agreements until VAT
implications, Exit arrangements and other important factors have been thought
through:
During 2001, a meeting was held between a very large North East further education
College and a nearby University to explore opportunities for collaboration which
would be of mutual benefit of both organisations. Strategically, the University
needed to respond to its recently publicised financial difficulties which involved the
potential redundancy of over 100 staff and the possibility of a ‘middle ground’
community education delivery in an (undefined) partnership was explored. Progress
was not likely to be made, however, until the University’s new strategic direction
had been determined. In the short term, the emphasis was on direct collaboration
where either duplication of facilities or specialist expertise resided within the
institutions. Initial possibilities and the first areas for exploration of potential
mutual benefit were as follows:
1. Reprographics – savings in premises, equipment and delivery costs appear
possible
2. Staff/student surveys – availability of a contracted University service in the short
term.
3. Refectory management – availability of a contracted University service.
4. IT procurement, consultancy and network provision – access to University
services to reduce costs
5. Blue Square Recruitment – University interest in the provision of agency staff.
6. Conference/seminar facilities – availability of alternative off-site facilities at
University.
7. Advice, guidance, counselling, careers – exploration of video links to specialist
services.
The reprographics proposal was taken forward. The College and University
consolidated reprographics on an industrial estate within geographical proximity of
each organisation. A lease agreement was taken out by the University. Equipment
was rationalised.
During 2006 the University decided to terminate the agreement. It would appear
that neither party “did not know what they did not know”, entering into a
collaborative arrangement without, it seems, going through due diligence in relation
to competitions law, VAT and exit arrangements. Part way through the partnership,
the College sought the advice of KPMG in relation to VAT charges for
reprographics. It appears that the University had not charged the College
appropriate VAT leading to an accumulated cost in excess of six figures.
The University decided to terminate the partnership and take the reprographics back
in-house. There does not appear to26 any available rationale for this decision.
be
27. F.11 One of the options looked at in relation to overcoming the issue of VAT was in
relation to secondment of staff to a Shared Services model. A senior LSC
Director reported that secondments made from LSC to outside organisations
incurred a VAT levy. This was further tested out by a further education college
secondment to the LSC with the Finance Department confirming that VAT was
applicable. Furthermore, there would have been added complexities with a
secondment model in relation to employee conditions of service varying across
organisations.
F.12 What became very clear as a result of researching the VAT issue, was that there
are several leading legal organisations that have been commissioned by different
public and private organisations to look at this major barrier. Indeed, it would
appear that one leading legal firm has been commissioned by several
organisations to look at the self same subject.
F.13 There is one remaining option to be tested in relation to VAT. It may be that where
a club is formed and membership fees and subscriptions are charged that there
could be VAT exemption. Professional advice is being commissioned to test this
proposition out formally with HMRC, but it would seem that there are few grounds
for optimism on the part of those seeking exemption. (Appendix 2)
F.14 For the purposes of this paper the assumption is that VAT will continue to be
levied for any form of Shared Services outside of mergers and certain types of
federations.
F.15 Outsourcing and Shared Services organisations such as NHS/Steria will state that
anything between 25% and 35% can be realised as efficiency savings. The
Treasury Operational Efficiency Programme Report (2009) has indicated cost
savings between 25% and 30% by process re-engineering back office
transactional activity into a Shared Services unit. Colin Cram has stated that
having created and managed several Shared Services operations that he can
confirm that cost savings of at least 20-30% are not unreasonable. If we
extrapolate these figures, on the worst case scenario of VAT being uplifted to 20%
in the next 12 months, this will mean that organisations can still hope to achieve
between zero and 10% through a Shared Services model. As public sector cuts
begin to roll out in the next few years, these savings could prove to be much more
attractive in the medium to longer term. It will be essential though to ensure that
achieved savings are at the higher end of the spectrum.
• TUPE/Pensions
F.16 Perhaps the biggest issue for colleges to consider when looking to make
efficiencies in transactional operations and consolidate support activities will be
the laws surrounding employees. The majority of Shared Services research
indicates that there should be the opportunity to TUPE staff into the new Shared
Services organisations.
F.17 Colleges may not want to negotiate the complexities of TUPE. Even so, some are
looking at ways to mitigate against existing generous terms and conditions of
employment which are very different in the private sector. Regulations such as
the Financial Reporting Standard 17 Retirement Benefits (FR17) are very
complex. Standard FR17 is based on the principle that organisations should
account for retirement benefits when it is committed to give them, even if the
actual giving will be many years into the future. This standard covers support staff
27
28. contributions to the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS). It does not
apply to the Teachers’ Pension Scheme (Accounts Direction Handbook 2008-09).
F.18 A respondent reported that one way of mitigating against the VAT levy was to
eventually have back office staff moved to private sector type contracts and
conditions of service that would reduce costs in the medium term to long term.
• Competitions Law
F.19 It would appear that both ACER and FE Sussex have models that can be
emulated in other areas of England in relation to meeting the requirements of
competitions law. Both organisations are managed through a Board of Principals
that direct the Chief Executive and management of each organisation.
F.20 Principles have been established by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) as
demonstrated by the “Teckal” exemption. The Teckal exemption was set out by
the European Court of Justice in 1999 in the case Teckal SrL v Cornune di Viano
and Azienda Gas – Acqua Consorziale di Reggio Emilia (C107/98). The
exemption provides that where two conditions are met the procurement can be
treated as in-house and therefore the procurement rules do not apply. These
conditions are as follows:
i. The contracting authority exercises over the entity supplying it a control which
is similar to that which it exercises over its own departments;
and
ii. That entity carries out the essential part of its activities with the controlling
contracting authority or authorities.
F.21 Both of these requirements appear to be met by ACER and FE Sussex. The
Government has been actively encouraging the public sector to explore
collaborations and partnerships to deliver services more efficiently and effectively
following the Gershon efficiency review (2004). However, legal advice needs to
be taken to ensure that organisations like ACER and FE Sussex meet the full
requirements of the ‘Teckal’ principles.
F.22 In Guidance for Collaborative Options Evaluation and Appraisal of Service
Delivery Models (2008), they concluded that it is very important to take account
and act upon the new developments which have taken place in the public
procurement environment. Assumptions which may have been made in the past
about the necessity to submit particular opportunities to advertisement need to be
challenged and tested with legal advisers.
F.23 The Learning and Skills Network (LSN) described a model of Shared Services
that appeared to be a subsidiary arm of LSN as a “not for profit” organisation
delivering Shared Services initially focusing on a cluster in London/South East
and then extending geographically further. It was not clear if the intention was to
be regional or national though one respondent did say that they thought that some
aspects of Shared Services could be better delivered regionally and some
nationally, but no work stream was specifically mentioned for each of the
geographical/size criteria. It was not clear from the discussion that the formulation
of the ‘not for profit’ organisation would pass the ‘Teckal’ principles.
28
29. F.24 Several respondents seemed to confuse the competitions law issues with VAT
believing that they were intrinsically one and the same. Where they thought the
competitions law issue was resolved, they immediately assumed a resolution of
the VAT issue.
• Information Technology
F.25 In relation to any model of Shared Services, it is essential to have good
information technology systems. For Shared Services in FE, two requirements
were highlighted by participants in the research. Firstly there is a need for the
shared service itself to have a well-developed Management Information System
so that it can robustly manage its own activities. Secondly, there is a need to
ensure that the services provided into colleges are supported by Management
Information Systems from within the colleges themselves.
F.26 There are approximately four leading management information for students
software houses in England (namely, Aggresso, Tribal, Compass and Capita). A
similar picture emerges for software houses in relation to Human Resource
Management and Finance. The research showed that the likelihood of colleges
who wish to come together in a Shared Services model, even at a sub-regional
level, having the same software licences for the major work streams is remote.
Moving colleges to the same information technology platform would involve a
significant management of change and take some time depending on the software
licence agreement terms entered into by each organisation.
F.27 Notwithstanding this, it is the case that there are initiatives that are underway and
which seek to improve information technology in the FE sector. The Learning and
Skills Network (LSN) reported that they have got a team of 6 dedicated staff
driving processes and technological developments and that the business case
they had developed for a Shared Services project necessitated there being 5
colleges willing to be part of a Shared Services business solution with 10 colleges
beginning to realise benefits.
F.28 JISC are not certain as to whether they will continue to be funded post July 2010.
In the meantime, the focus of JISC Shared Services seems to be in congruence
with their definition of Shared Services (quoted in Section D2) and they have held
events to look at collaboration in higher education in the procurement of a virtual
learning environment (VLE) that will also have a commercial return. However, at
the event in February 2010, JISC reported that all project bids had been ‘frozen’
for the immediate future due to constraints placed on funds.
F.29 The ACER are formulating a business case to enable its member colleges to have
a Shared Services business solution for human resources. Research carried out
by ACER indicates that half of their member colleges are on the same HR
software with the other half on a variety of different software solutions. However,
whilst this meets the competitions law requirements as mentioned above, it is not
clear that this model meets the requirements of VAT exemption.
F.30 The DCSF have led on a Shared Schools Recruitment Project for the delivery of
e-recruitment into the 24,000 schools in England. The project cost £350,000 to
set up. DCSF have linked in with ACER to replicate this approach and encourage
a wider take up so that it can be used Nationally by any further education college.
29
30. F.31 During the early part of 2007, a small working party made up from the National
Advisory Group for Shared Services membership visited Northern Ireland. Since
this visit took place 16 further education colleges in Northern Ireland have
reduced to 6. The lead organisations for this change were the Department for
Education and Learning (DEL) and the Association of Northern Ireland Colleges
(ANIC).
F.32 The ANIC project management team developed the Northern Ireland College
Systems Project (NICIS) during 2002. This project was established to replace the
then College Information System in each of the 16 further education colleges.
The scope of the project included student management, human resources, payroll
and estates management. The finance system was implemented in August 2006.
F.33 Student management software and human resources/payroll was provided by
Distinction Systems Limited based in Swansea and the contract was managed
locally by British Telecom. This was a significant procurement exercise for ANIC/
DEL. It was decided that a single central database would provide centrally held
data to both colleges and DEL in real time, together with unlimited flexibility in the
content and format of what users said. The NICIS project team developed
reporting systems for student and personnel management that fully addressed all
statutory returns required by DEL for funding and monitoring purposes.
F.34 The visit to Northern Ireland included seeing the development of the management
of student data from the user’s perspective. North Down and Ards Institute of
Further and Higher Education College showed us the bespoke reporting
developments that a team of 5 software technical staff working with both students
and College staff had developed. This was very impressive, showcasing some
excellent reporting tools that had been developed through Sharepoint and pivot
tables that enabled students, staff and management to easily extract data to
support decision making processes.
F.35 Some three years on, delegates from BIS, LSC, City of Sunderland College and
South Tyneside College visited Northern Ireland during the early part of 2010 to
see the progress that had been made since the first visit.
F.36 The first part of the visit was to explore with ANIC the NICIS project from its
inception in 2002. Specific questions centred on the funding of the project and the
selection of software licences. ANIC reported that DEL had fully funded the first 5
years of the project (both capital and revenue costs). The NICIS project
management and small team of 5 software and hardware specialists were from
ANIC. From around 2007, the project became a joint venture between DEL and
ANIC both contributing 50% funding.
F.37 It was decided during the time of merger (16 colleges becoming 6) that NICIS
would be a managed service and that pay and conditions of service would be
centralised for the 6 colleges.
F.38 As part of the efficiency drive, ANIC are being asked by their member colleges to
explore Shared Services, particularly for legal services (ANIC respondents
referred to the FE Sussex model). They were also interested in the findings of
this report particularly in relation to management of information of students
procurement and associated costs (ANIC are currently using Aggresso software
licence for student management). ANIC reported that they currently pay around
£81,000 per college for student software (approximately £486,000 for the 6
colleges). Other related costs included data centre and support costs of £212,000
per year and additional software licence costs for finance. When questioned as
30
31. to the reason for going with an ‘off the shelf’ software licence solution, the project
manager responded that he did not know although he felt it made sense to have
thought of developing a fully integrated management information system and that
the current software solution was not fully interoperable.
F.39 There does not appear to be a comprehensive spend analysis to be able to
accurately interrogate the costs of software licences in England, though the
Northern Ireland costs do seem similar to both City of Sunderland and South
Tyneside Colleges payments. If we extrapolate the figures in F.38 above and
apply them to the 358 English colleges, the costs for student management
software licences would be around £29m per annum.
F.40 The idea of the sector developing a fully interoperable management information
system specific to its needs has been explored with most of the stakeholders
listed in Section A above. Several respondents suggested approaching the
existing software companies to take forward this idea. However, this would place
a provider in a monopoly position and such a solution is, therefore, unlikely to
maximise savings.
F.41 Obviously, this is a suggestion only in response to paying for a product that does
not fully deliver the required outcomes and is also very costly, both from a non-
pay software licence perspective and staff costs in relation to software specialists
to try and get the software to do what is required. One respondent said,
“whenever you ask the software licence company to effect a change, it costs £70k
and how many times do we have to do this in response to funding changes?”
• Transition-Related Human Resources Management
F.42 Change management and cultural effects were only raised by two respondents
when discussing the issues and barriers. However, during the reviews of the
Collaboration Fund Projects (in Section ‘I’), college culture figured prominently
during discussions on barriers to the projects.
• Collaboration
F.43 Reference has already been made to the way in which colleges guard their
independence and to the way in which some colleges behave in a very bullish
way, seeking to take-over those they perceive as being financially weaker.
• Quality and Performance
F.44 The view was expressed that there was an absence of a wide-ranging, consistent
and reliable database from which performance indicators could be developed or
results for existing indicators drawn easily. This meant that comparisons were
compromised. If a Shared Services solution could help rectify this then it should.
31
32. G CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
G.1 At various times throughout the carrying out of the research respondents were
asked what they felt the critical success factors would be from their organisational
perspective in relation to a Shared Services solution. The vast majority of
respondents cited cash savings and high quality as being critical success factors.
One of the more detailed and well thought out responses came from a Principal
who commented that they included:
Critical Success Factors
• “Reduction in cost of at least 10-20%;
• an improvement in service standards in all areas;
• flexibility to provide the required data to the front line in a timely manner;
• flexibility to respond quickly to changes in requirements from the college or
funders;
• the removal of the overhead required in the management of support staff;
• release of space to provide opportunities for teaching and possible growth”.
G.2 Perhaps it is most important to note a theme that seems to run through much of
the thinking on Shared Services critical success factors. This is that costs should
be reduced and savings made through the elimination of waste and reduced
bureaucracy.
G.3 No one mentioned any further critical success factors. The need to deliver these
has to be kept in mind. They will guide base line information requirements and
performance monitoring.
G.4 Delegates at the Seminar event in Sheffield were asked to individually describe
the critical success factors from both their own and particular organisations
perspective. Responses to add to those mentioned above were “less duplication;
transformation of how things are done; responsiveness; impartiality; documented
and benchmarked so that improvements can be monitored/managed; shared
services becomes the ‘norm’ way of working (embedded); reduce bureaucracy;
dependency and control not an issue; enables front-line staff to focus on delivery
(ie, Teaching)”. All of these factors add further value to the initial responses in
G.1 above to inform the base line information requirements and performance
monitoring.
32
33. H REVIEW OF LSC COLLABORATION FUND PROJECTS
H.1 This section reviews the project reports from the Learning and Skills Council
Collaboration Fund Projects and describes the successes and barriers from each
project leads perspective.
H.2 The Collaboration and Sharing Fund was established by the LSC to help colleges
to develop and test collaboration practices. The funding set out to support
projects that:
• Prove the concept of collaboration and sharing
• Demonstrate the value of collaboration and sharing to the sector
• Define collaboration and sharing potential in the context of college operations
• Develop knowledge and expertise in collaboration and sharing, producing
reusable tools and techniques.
H.3 A total of ten projects were supported mostly centred on a shared procurement
service between colleges in a close geographical area (sub-regional or regional)
to each other.
H.4 One project set out to establish regional procurement services. The Project Lead
reported several key successes such as the development and implementation of a
Regional Procurement Strategy; the delivery of procurement officers training;
raising awareness of OGC frameworks and consortium purchasing; the
implementation of Government purchasing cards (p.card) to member colleges;
consolidated supplier list; member colleges’ commitment to sustaining the
Procurement Manager’s salary funded through the project monies. The critical
success factor referred to by the respondent was the need to save money.
In particular, reference was made to the work done by the Procurement Manager
with one of the member colleges that may result in significant cashable savings.
The major barriers experienced were in relation to colleges continuing to fund the
Procurement Manager salary post collaboration fund project. Whilst colleges
have been extremely positive about the services provided, the respondent
reported that there is some reluctance to pay.
H.5 The same organisation had another project supported by LSC for the provision of
HR and Financial services. This is where a senior manager of an independent
charity limited by guarantee is seconded to member colleges of the organisation.
The role was to share HR resources and policies starting with four member
colleges. This has extended and now includes 7 member colleges. Colleges pay
for the HR services through ‘membership’ fees.
A similar scenario was provided for the financial services whereby 2 member
colleges were working collaboratively. Clearly this ties into Section F.3 in relation
to testing out the VAT issue concerning membership fees. Again, the same kinds
of issues emerge when exploring the barriers and that is the member colleges’
willingness to pay for the services once the project funding finishes.
33
34. H.6 The Pan-Sussex Joint Procurement collaboration engaged Exor (Exor is a
software tool that enables non-pay spend to be captured and categorised).
Respondents who have used the system liken it to a ‘Thomsons Directory’. It
would be relatively simple to roll this out to other colleges This information has
enabled the Pan-Sussex group to tackle the major spend areas (examinations,
telecommunications, insurances) and have joint procurement negotiations. This
has already had a direct positive outcome in connection with examination fees
already saving more than £250,000 and as reported by the Chief Executive
Officer in the Times Educational Supplement, “… we are ahead of our target for a
10% reduction by the end of 2011” (April 2010). It would appear that the Sussex
model is at the forefront of improving value for money from examination fees and
work with awarding bodies.
The joint procurement of HR/Payroll and Health and Safety is still being
implemented. However, the respondent said there were barriers. There seemed
to be a college culture that prevailed described as “we know best”. Issues such
as college staff being overworked, relying on good will to provide information and
inertia were some of the problems experienced by the respondent, together with
translation of strategic leadership into operational management.
H.7 There are nine colleges in the Leicestershire county boundary, six General
Further Education and three 6th Form Colleges. The Vice Principal for Finance
was involved in the National Advisory Group for Shared Services in further
education in 2007 with the major work stream for finance and would be a keen
advocate, but for the issues of VAT and Competitions Law requirements.
Before the start of the Shared Procurement Services Project, a Steering Group of
mainly finance people from each of the nine colleges was formed that
subsequently sought agreement from all Principals to put forward the bid to the
Collaboration Fund. Leicestershire College then took the lead in relation to
appointing a professional Procurement Manager and getting the right person with
the required skill mix proved to be challenging. EXOR was used initially to profile
the spend in each of the nine colleges. However, this proved difficult to
implement because of categorisation of data issues. The newly appointed
Procurement Manager, therefore, developed a procurement register to capture
the relevant data for analysis.
There are several projects that the Procurement Manager is working on, namely,
IT Hardware, Examination Board Cost Reductions, Insurance, Recruitment
Advertising, Temporary Staff Recruitment, Legal Services, Human Resources
Services and Finance Systems. One of the major barriers in getting the group (of
nine colleges) to work together was a perception that “Leicester College is taking
over”. One way round this has been for the Procurement Manager to take a lead
on, for example, Examination Board Cost Reductions, work up the business case
and then bring the Steering Group of colleges together to present the findings.
However, it was felt that just over a year down the line the other partner colleges
still behave with suspicion in relation to Leicester College. This may be because
Leicester is much larger than the other eight colleges, but also because the
Procurement Manager is on the Leicester College payroll. It will be interesting to
see how the Procurement Manager role evolves when all nine colleges are
responsible for paying the salary and how the contract of employment and VAT
issues will be tackled.
34
35. H.8 The Cumbrian Colleges Collaborative Procurement Project is very similar to the
ones discussed above. However, it would seem that integration of the
Procurement Manager’s role was much smoother. This may be because the
Cumbrian Colleges formulated a Joint Venture entity several years ago and had
well established collaborative groups each focusing on key areas of work such as
human resources, quality and finance and were used to sharing practices.
The Procurement Manager has been in post for just over a year and reported that
his biggest challenge was ‘winning hearts and minds’. All four Cumbrian Colleges
now use the procurement services and, though the Procurement Manager is on
the Lakes College payroll, he is based at one of the other colleges and works with
budget holders in each of the colleges.
The Procurement Manager has analysed non-pay spend for each of the colleges
and reported that £1.2m is spent on examinations between all four Cumbrian
colleges. He has also demonstrated the high volume of low-level transactions
resulting in copious invoices and now three of the four Cumbrian colleges use the
Government’s Purchasing Card (p.card) thereby streamlining the whole process.
The Finance Director reported that the colleges are using the Efficiency
Measurement Model (EMM), but only for procurement. Work is under way to
begin to capture EMM non-pay and capital efficiencies. The Procurement
Manager reported that the biggest success of the collaboration fund project has
been the relationship building which has been very productive developed over a
period of time. Again, it remains to be seen when the project ends how the four
Cumbrian colleges will address funding the Procurement Manager role.
H.9 The project between Cardinal Newman College and Blackpool Sixth Form College
is an example where two similar sized sixth form colleges have worked together to
look at short term collaboration around areas of procurement. The respondent
said that both colleges are extremely keen to look at shared services in the longer
term, but said that there not ‘examples out there’. In the early days of the project
it became apparent that an understanding of collaboration was not very well
developed. Therefore, a ‘Collaboration’ Work Day event was held with senior
managers starting with a presentation of aims and goals of what collaboration is in
terms of procurement and the perceived potential drawbacks. The outcome of the
event was an action plan for both short and long term goals.
One of the barriers experienced whilst working through the short term goals was
the two colleges getting to ‘contract alignment’. Most contracts tend to be on
three year timescales and the respondent reported that to achieve standardisation
would be costly and take several years to achieve. The use of Exor was reported
as being an invaluable and very insightful process to go through. The respondent
said that all colleges found it easy to pull together the data to analyse which is a
stark contrast to the Leicester College experience.
Collaboration between the two sixth form colleges departments was reported as
being widely different. The respondent said that the 2 Estates Managers had a
“fantastic working relationship that was leading to fantastic outcomes and really
was demonstrating more for less”. Joint Continuous Professional Development
(CPD) for Manual Handling courses had halved the costs. The Estates
Departments are also looking to reduce revenue by looking at more sustainable
measures to reduce energy requirements.
35
36. The respondent reported that although both Colleges have identified a number of
key functions that could be organised between Finance, MIS, Library and HR, one
of the major challenges encountered is how they could legally demonstrate their
ability to deliver in accordance with the Instrument and Articles of Governance.
Overview of LSC Collaboration Fund Projects
The overall emphasis has been on procurement, though not exclusively so. All projects
have demonstrated significant successes in efficiencies. Most respondents reported a lack
of trust, suspicion and operational difficulties experienced at the outset of the projects.
Over a period of time the dynamics changed as a result of building up relationships and
demonstrating procurement successes.
The National Audit Office (2006) published Improving Procurement in Further Education
Colleges in England and stated that, “Whilst colleges’ procurement systems are largely
well established in terms of internal controls, most colleges’ systems, processes and
procedures have not kept up with modern procurement practice. Savings are clearly
achievable”. The LSC projects would seem to confirm this.
The Collaboration Fund initiative has undoubtedly impacted in a positive way on some of
the more proactive colleges, but there are still a considerable number within the sector
that have not begun the journey.
Colin Cram has asserted that, “The structure of public sector procurement remains too
much the legacy of past fragmentation and the independence from the ‘Crown’ of much
of the public sector, eg, local authorities (whose procurement spend is £40bn pa), NHS
trusts, higher and further education institutions and the myriad of ‘non-departmental
public bodies’. Arguably there are several thousand public sector procurement
organisations and 40,000 procurement points. There are 40 buying agencies/consortia,
some regional, others national or semi-national; some co-exist, others compete. There is
a great deal of product overlap”.
The Collaboration Fund has enabled, albeit on a very small scale, colleges to group
together non-pay costs and items such as I.T. hardware, staff development, examinations
and software licences and to collectively procure. In so doing they have been able to
make substantial savings.
36
37. J SHARED SERVICES DEVELOPMENT AND
IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMEMTS
J.1 This section will describe the support requirements of the Further Education
Sector if the implementation of Shared Services is to be a success.
J.2 These recommendations are based on knowledge and experience built up by the
author in carrying out the research, starting from the time when the Government
published Sir Peter Gershon’s Review of Public Sector Efficiency (2004) and the
Transformational Government Strategy (2005). The strategy had three key
transformations, one of which cited Government moving to a Shared Services
culture. Since then, and believing that Shared Services had a great deal to offer
the FE sector, the author has been involved in work aimed at trying to move
forward this agenda. The following case study illustrates this and points up some
of the support that would be required.
J.3 CASE STUDY: Shared Services in Sunderland and South Tyneside Colleges
The City of Sunderland College and South Tyneside College agreed to explore the
feasibility of establishing a Shared Services solution. The 2 colleges had previously
collaborated on the procurement of financial software licence resulting in a cashable
saving of over 40% of single licence agreements.
Senior managers agreed on the scope of work to be considered for Shared Services
(Finance, HRM, MIS and the associated processes under these major work streams)
developing the business case for each respective college. The Chartered Institute of
Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA), Sharing the Gain (2010), business case
templates were used to capture this information (Appendix 3).
However, having arrived at a position statement, other external events took over. As a
result of significant income reductions affecting most of the further education sector,
both City of Sunderland College and South Tyneside College needed to review their
respective organisational structures. This has temporarily slowed the development
process and the building of a strong business case. Nonetheless, it is clear that a
Shared Services solution may offer several efficiencies, such creating a secure,
managed data centre that could be scaled up to bring in other local colleges who have
not benefited from capital grants. This would further support the movement of
transactional type activities into such an environment. Both colleges are now on the
same financial software platform and have been working together to develop joint
processes. IT software compatibility is not yet in place for the other major work
streams.
Senior management teams in both colleges have a real desire to collaborate in relation
to a Shared Services solution. Both colleges had applied and been unsuccessful in
their bids for capital grants and had incurred considerable expenditure in project
management and architect fees. In the meantime, minor refurbishments and works on
the IT infrastructure were kept to a minimum. This will be fairly common picture for
those colleges that were unsuccessful in their capital grant bids.
37