The document discusses peak oil theory and political factors affecting the oil market. It argues that while Hubbert's peak oil theory is valid, geological limitations alone will not cause economic issues due to vast untapped reserves. However, the oil market is not truly free and government intervention in exploration, pricing, consumption and other areas could potentially lead to constraints on supply and serious economic problems in the future for political rather than geological reasons. The bottom line is that sustained commodity shortages only occur when governments interfere in markets.

1. Peak Oil
As we've noted in previous article’s, Hubbert's "Peak Oil" theory appears to be valid. It is certainly supported by observation in
that many cases can be cited where the production from an oil field or an entire oil-producing region has gone into decline
exactly as predicted by this theory. However, we do not believe that geological limitations to oil supply constitute a major
economic issue. There are vast untapped oil reserves in the world, and if the oil market were able to operate freely then these
reserves would probably satisfy demand for generations to come. Furthermore, the free market would develop economically
viable alternatives well before we reached the point where oil supply was limited by geology. In a nutshell, a sustained shortage
of a commodity as useful as energy would never occur in a free market.
Which brings us to the root of the problem: the oil market is not free. This, and not any geological considerations, will potentially
lead to troublesome constraints on oil supply in the future. In other words, if there is going to be an oil supply problem with
grave economic consequences then the origin of the problem will be political, not geological.
The free market is very good at anticipating potential supply shortages and addressing the unanticipated shortages that
periodically crop up, but governments around the world have their tentacles deeply immersed in the oil business, from oil
exploration all the way through to the consumption of oil-based products. In particular, governments: a) heavily regulate oil
exploration and production, b) control or influence the prices of oil and oil-based products, c) attempt to influence energy
consumption trends, d) reduce, eliminate, or manipulate in some other way the economic incentives to expand supply, and e)
use oil as a means of gaining geopolitical advantage. Here are some specific examples:
* The US government has a history of imposing or threatening price controls and "windfall profit" taxes whenever there is a
large increase in the oil price, thus discouraging the oil industry from responding in the appropriate way to price signals. The US
government also places severe restrictions on where oil drilling can occur and is about to massively distort both the supply and
the demand for oil via its "Cap and Trade" program.
* The federal and provincial governments in Canada have a history of changing the rules (royalties and taxes, for instance) on
the oil and gas industry, thus creating more uncertainty than there should be.
* China consumes far more oil than it should because its government ramps up the money supply at a rapid rate and
simultaneously caps the gasoline price at an artificially low level.
* Russia has used its control over European gas supply as a geopolitical weapon in the past and will probably do the same in
the future.
* Some governments, the Venezuelan government being the highest-profile example, have "nationalised" (read: stolen)
privately-owned oil production facilities and reserves, to the detriment of oil supply.
The bottom line is that sustained shortages of useful commodities only occur when the government inserts itself into the
supply/demand equation. The oil market is no exception, so if insufficient oil supply becomes a serious long-term economic
problem then the underlying cause will be political, not geological.
Current Market Situation
If this is the case then the short-term downside risk is much greater than the short-term upside potential. In our opinion, the
short-term downside risk is defined by the December 08 and February 09 lows (we expect that these lows will be tested after the
post-crash rebound runs its course). We have shifted our short-term oil outlook from "neutral" to "bearish" on the basis that the
rebound in the oil price from its early-July low to its early-August high is looking more like a counter-trend move than the next
up-leg of an intermediate-term advance. If the nearest oil futures contract closes above its June peak at some point over the next
few weeks then we are clearly wrong about this and will immediately shift back to the sidelines.

2. Considering the economic backdrop, even if the oil price were to break above its June peak ($75 in the September contract) we
doubt that it would make significant additional headway. However, we have learned not to under-estimate the effects of trend-
following speculation on this market. After all, the oil price was able to rise from the $70s in mid-2007 to the $140s in mid-2008 in
parallel with deteriorating fundamentals (rising physical supply and declining physical demand). In that instance, speculation
regarding US$ inflation was the primary driver of the price trend.
If the oil price does break out to new highs for the year then the catalyst will likely be a break to new lows by the Dollar Index
(improbable, but not out of the question) or rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East (impossible to handicap). Daily Chart
NYMEX crude oil future’s – daily close above 80 dollars suggest an uptrend and getting to overbought levels on the short term -
Support now at 76.50 and 73.50 levels on a daily chart
During the past few months major finds have been confirmed in Brazil, Iraq, and Colombia (they need plenty of work
before they come on stream) and reserves have been increased dramatically in Saudi Arabia, and then there are the oil sands
and oil shales to consider, which will become doable if prices inflate much from here, and then there are deposits in Alaska
and the Great basin that are tied in knots by environment issues, and then there are recent breakthroughs in recovery
techniques that are generally ignored by the bulls.
It also bothers me that there is no correlation between the size of positions taken in commodities by index funds and the
finite amount of goods available. Here I think regulators have been more than remiss and the exchanges utter scoundrels
(commission flow rules their approach to self regulation) in identifying these people as commercials. The crux of the matter
in all the commodity markets is the same. What is the premium to value that is attributable to speculative positions held by
these money lords? Ultimately, they will increase nominal prices for a bubbled item to the extent that usage plummets for it
because real world processors won’t be able to pass the speculative premium on. Then the bubblers will move on to price
crushed items and bubble them:

3. Microsec Commerze Limited : Www.microsec.in ; www.commoditylive.in
Phones 009133-30512100 / 30512139 -40 Fax 009133 -30512020
To see our various commodity, currency and related world financial market articles visit
www.4shared.com and type Microsec And Or Shamik Bhose in the search column ; you can also visit our
commodity dept. website of www.commoditylive.in and type / click on the reports icon on the top left
corner of the screen
Weekly Candlestick charts – suggesting a breakout on daily close – looking to a strong weekly close and within an uptrend
but not yet overbought
Natural Gas Weekly Chart
Natural gas in U.S. storage for the week ended Aug. 21 stood at 3.258trillion cubic feet - 19% higher than last year and 18%
above the five-year average.
FUTURES SETTLEMENT NET CHANGE Rupee Contract
Nymex Oct $2.977 -5.6c MCX Sept 146.20
Nymex Nov $3.998 -5.5c MCX Oct 196.70
Nymex Dec $4.832 -8.1c MCX Nov 237.10

4. Natural Gas Speculators Reduce Net Short Positions
Large noncommercial traders added to long contracts and cut short contracts from their natural gas futures positions during
the week ended Sept. 1, reducing their net short positions, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission reported Friday.
The CFTC began splitting large traders into four categories in September. Money managers and other reportables comprise
the previous "non-commercial" column, while swap dealers and producers, merchants, processors and users were broken out
of the commercial category.
Its true that demand cover is comfortable, crack margins have imploded, this year global demand growth is expected to be
fully met by supply growth from Non-Opec leading to stock piling in the second half of 2008, spot demand has been driven
a large extent by demand from Governments looking to fill reserves… All these things in the past would have invited lower
oil prices … But its not happening this time…..Oil surge is just like what nickel did, before its reversion during first half of
2007…
- Dollar - Financial markets and money supply - - Backwardation - Little action from the government…
-
Money needs a haven to get parked, with hedge fund managers finding the financial market treacherous, found a life line
with strong commodity prices… Higher prices attract more people…virtuous cycle, till the marginal cost of liquidity far
exceeds the expected marginal return…The same thing is being played here… we need to watch more technical factors to
ascertain when that tipping point shall come.. viz: OI, volume, backwardation, oscillators…
Of course, one big question to ponder when it comes to markets is how Oil will fare in an upcoming, perhaps global
economic contraction. To this end, with the Oil market showing some signs of near term weakness, we thought we would
spend a moment and try to understand where Oil may be headed in the months ahead.

5. Back in 2008 that prices had come up against important price resistance and we took pains to note the complexity of the
situation as we knew that the grudge match of an approaching recession versus a weak currency would be complex and
dynamic to assess in real time. Yet, today’s circumstance is radically altered by the recent turn by the Fed toward a policy of
monetary easing. In doing so, the Fed is kicking out the support from underneath the US Dollar in a move for which they
will almost certainly eventually pay for dearly. Opening the door to a currency crisis is no solution to a bad debt problem,
except it spreads the pain over an even wider number of individuals, in this case, everyone holding dollars.”
As it turned out, the weak Dollar carried the day, and Oil prices surged rapidly toward $100 before beginning a 9-week
consolidation spanning early November 2007 to early February 2008. With the decisive movement into new all time high
ground, the next question becomes, what does this imply for the larger Elliott Count on Crude Oil?
Take a close look at the chart below, which shows Crude Oil and the 52 week Rate of Change. At the bottom left, we see
momentum levels ‘kicking off’ the bull market in early 2003, followed by the huge surge in momentum which typically
confirms the epicenter of a bull trend with the 52 week Rate of Change.
Above: Crude Oil and the 52 week Rate of Change Momentum Oscillator surging again in 2004-2005.
Flash forward to the right side of the chart, and what do we see? Once again, we see very high levels of momentum. This
is clearly not any type of 5th wave action, and doubtful that this is the end of a Third Wave with such very high overall
upside mo.’ Instead, the more likely outcome is that prices are still sub-dividing and building into an even larger
advance, with the ‘extended wave’ for Crude probably evolving as an Extended Wave Three.
Cast against the backdrop of the long-term history of Oil prices, In this case, the concept of “Peak Oil” may be the
dominant factor which alerts the public to the idea that Oil prices are simply not coming down. Alternatively, a
heightened currency collapse and the de-pegging of Gulf State currencies to the US Dollar and dethroning of the US
Dollar as sole commodity pricing currency could be other trigger events which could force Oil prices sharply higher.
Crude Oil prices with long term Elliott Wave channel.

7. Crude Oil with 200 week moving average in red. $64 to $65 is now long term critical support.
Microsec Commerze Limited : Www.microsec.in ; www.commoditylive.in
Phones 009133-30512100 / 30512139 -40 Fax 009133 -30512020
To see our various commodity, currency and related world financial market articles visit
www.4shared.com and type Microsec And Or Shamik Bhose in the search column ; you can also visit our
commodity dept. website of www.commoditylive.in and type / click on the reports icon on the top left
corner of the screen
DISCLAIMER AND PRIVILEGE NOTICE : This e-mail and any files transmitted with it contain
confidential, copyright, proprietary and legally privileged information. It should not be used by anyone
who is not the original intended recipient. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other
person is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply
email and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that
do not relate to official business of the writer or associates / group shall be understood to be neither
given nor endorsed by us.. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, Secure, error or
virus-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions."