Download as DOCX, PPTX
More Related Content
Similar to Section a + b mark scheme
More from twbsmediaconnell
Section a + b mark scheme
- 1. SECTION A MARKSCHEME Level 1 INCOMPLETE/MINIMAL Level 2 BASIC Level 3 PROFICIENT Level 4 EXCELLENT EAA Explanation/analysis/argument (0-7 marks) • Shows minimal understandingof the task • Minimal understandingof the way that technical aspects areused to construct the extract’s representations • Of minimal relevanceto set question or a brief response(under one and a half sides of answer booklet) Explanation/analysis/argument (8-11 marks) • Shows basic understandingof the task •Basic understandingof the way that technical aspects areused to construct the extract’s representations • Some relevance to set question Explanation/analysis/argument (12-15 marks) • Shows proficientunderstandingof the task •Proficientunderstandingof the way that technical aspects areused to constructthe extract’s representations • Mostly relevant to set question Explanation/analysis/argument (16-20 marks) • Shows excellent understandingof the task • Excellentknowledge and understanding of the way that technical aspects areused to constructthe extract’s representations • Clearly relevantto set question EG Use of examples (0-7 marks) • Offers minimal textual evidence from the extract • Offers a limited range of examples (only one technical area covered) • Offers examples of minimal relevance to the set question Use of examples (8-11 marks) •Offers some textual evidence from the extract •Offers a partial rangeof examples (at leasttwo technical areas covered) •Offers examples of some relevance to the set question Use of examples (12-15 marks) • Offers consistenttextual evidence from the extract •Offers a range of examples (at leastthree technical areas covered) • Offers examples which are mostly relevant to the set question Use of examples (16-20 marks) •Offers frequent textual analysisfromthe extract – award marks to reflect the range and appropriateness of examples •Offers a full rangeof examples from each technical area •Offers examples which are clearly relevant to the set question T Use of terminology (0-3 marks) • Minimal or frequently inaccurateuseof appropriateterminology Use of terminology (4-5 marks) • Some terminology used, although there may be some inaccuracies Use of terminology (6-7 marks) • Use of terminology is mostly accurate Use of terminology (8-10 marks) • Use of terminology is relevantand accurate Writing (no marks) Somesimpleideashavebeen expressed. There will besomeerrors of spelling, punctuation and grammar,which will be noticeableand intrusive.Writing may also lack legibility. Somesimpleideas havebeen expressed in an appropriatecontext. There are likely to be someerrors of spelling, punctuation and grammarof which some may be noticeable and intrusive. Straightforward ideashavebeen expressed with someclarity and fluency. Arguments aregenerally relevant,though may stray fromthe pointof thequestion.There will besome errors of spelling,punctuation and grammar,butthese are unlikely to beintrusive or obscuremeaning. Complex ideashavebeen expressed clearly and fluently. Sentencesand paragraphs,consistently relevant,havebeen well structured, using appropriatetechnical terminology. There may be few, if any, errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar.
- 2. SECTION B MARKSCHEME Level 1 INCOMPLETE/MINIMAL Level 2 BASIC Level 3 PROFICIENT Level 4 EXCELLENT EAA Explanation/analysis/argument (0-7 marks) • Shows minimal understandingof the task • Minimal knowledge and understanding of institutional/audiencepractices – general opinions or assertions predominate • Minimal argumentevident, with little reference to casestudy material • Of minimal relevanceto set question or a very brief response Explanation/analysis/argument (8-11 marks) • Shows basic understandingof the task • Basic knowledge and understandingof institutional/audiencepractices –factual knowledge will havesome accuracy • Basic argumentevident, with some reference to casestudy material • Some relevance to set question Explanation/analysis/argument (12-15 marks) • Shows proficientunderstandingof the task • Proficientknowledge and understanding of institutional/audiencepractices –factual knowledge is mostly accurate • Some developed argument, supported by reference to casestudy material • Mostly relevant to set question Explanation/analysis/argument (16-20 marks) • Shows excellent understandingof the task • Excellentknowledge and understanding of institutional/audiencepractices – factual knowledge is relevant and accurate • A clear and developed argument, substantiated by detailed reference to casestudy material • Clearly relevantto set question EG Use of examples (0-7 marks) • Offers minimal useof casestudy material • Offers a limited range of or inappropriateexamples • Offers examples of minimal relevance to set question Use of examples (8-11 marks) • Offers some evidence from casestudy material • Offers a partial rangeof examples from casestudy and own experience • Offers examples of some relevance to the set question Use of examples (12-15 marks) • Offers consistentevidence from case study material • Offers a range of examples in some detail from casestudy and own experience • Offers examples which are mostly relevant to the set question Use of examples (16-20 marks) • Offers frequent evidence from case study material – award marks to reflect the range and appropriateness of examples • Offers a full rangeof detailed examples from casestudy and own experience • Offers examples which are clearly relevant to the set question T Use of terminology (0-3 marks) • Minimal or frequently inaccurateuseof appropriateterminology Use of terminology (4-5 marks) • Some terminology used, although there may be some inaccuracies Use of terminology (6-7 marks) • Use of terminology is mostly accurate Use of terminology (8-10 marks) • Use of terminology is relevantand accurate Writing (no marks) Somesimpleideashavebeen expressed. There will besomeerrors of spelling, punctuation and grammar,which will be noticeableand intrusive.Writing may also lack legibility. Somesimpleideas havebeen expressed in an appropriatecontext. There are likely to be someerrors of spelling, punctuation and grammarof which some may be noticeable and intrusive. Straightforward ideashavebeen expressed with someclarity and fluency. Arguments aregenerally relevant,though may stray fromthe pointof thequestion.There will besome errors of spelling,punctuation and grammar,butthese are unlikely to beintrusive or obscuremeaning. Complex ideashavebeen expressed clearly and fluently. Sentencesand paragraphs,consistently relevant,havebeen well structured, using appropriatetechnical terminology. There may be few, if any,errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar.