Presentation at the Innovations 2015 Conference in Boston, MA. Discover the innovative ways Virginia's 23 community colleges are working together to leverage shared system resources to scale openly-licensed course materials.
Co-presenting with:
Cheryl Huff, Germanna Community College
Jane Rosecrans, J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College
Preston Davis, Northern Virginia Community College
2. Scaling OPEN
Reducing Textbook Costs
Across Virginia’s Community
Colleges
Innovations Conference 2015
Boston, MA
March 10th, 2015
3. Preston Davis, Director, Extended Learning Institute Northern Virginia
Community College
wdavis@nvcc.edu
Cheryl Huff, English Department Chair
Germanna Community College
chuff@germanna.edu
Jane Rosecrans, Faculty
J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College
jrosecrans@reynolds.edu
Richard Sebastian, Director of Teaching & Learning Technologies
Virginia Community College System
rsebastian@vccs.edu
Scaling OPEN
Panel
5. BACKGROUND
• The Textbook Costs and Digital Learning
Resources (TCDLR) Committee TCDLR Final
Report, released in January 2015.
• The Chancellor’s OER Adoption Grants (I & II)
offered selected faculty and library staff stipends
and support to adopt and adapt high-quality OER
for high-enrollment courses.
6. BACKGROUND
• The Chancellor’s Innovation Fund also funded
several OER projects, including the development
of Northern Virginia Community College’s all-
OER associate degrees in general studies and
social science.
• Tidewater Community College developed the Z
Degree, an associate of science degree in
Business Administration that can be earned with
no textbook costs.
7. SO FAR
• 70+ OER courses
• 16 colleges
• 3 all-OER degrees
• Approaching $2+ million in savings in
textbook costs.*
• OER interest and use by VCCS faculty has
grown significantly in the past 2 years.
13. Current ELI OER Courses
40 Digital Open classes with no textbook costs
• English: ENG 111, ENG 112, ENG 123, ENG 125
• College Mat: MTH 151, MTH 152, MTH 157
• Science: PHY 201, PHY 202
• History: HIS 121, HIS 122
• Communications: CST 110
• Physical Education: PED 116
• Economics: ECO 201, ECO 202
• Student Development: SDV 100
• Information Technology: ITE 115
• Humanities/Fine Arts: ART 101, ART 102, REL 100, MUS
121
• Social/Behavioral Sciences: HIS 262, PSY 200, SOC 200
14. Costs of Pilot Course Textbooks
ENG 111: $140
ENG 112 : $93
ENG 125:$89
MTH 151:$263
PHY 201: $269
PHY 202: $244
HIS 121: $109
HIS 122: $109
ART 101: $226
ART 102: $226
SDV 100: $77
CST 110: $140
ECO 201: $281.80
ECO 202: $281.80
ITE 115: $182.70
MTH 152: $161.80
MTH 157: $123.55
MUS 121: $141.45
PED 116: $92.85
PSY 200: $107.15
REL 100: $138.55
SOC 200: $114.65
Potential savings of $3600 per
student completing full OER AS
Degree Track
Average cost of Textbooks =
$185
15. Outcomes
Access
Over 5000 NOVA students have taken a course in our OER
program since fall 2013, with access to free/open material
digitally delivered through the LMS in the OER online
courses!
Affordability
NOVA students enrolled in OER courses in the ELI Open
Educational Resources AS program have saved over
$800,000 to date… soon to exceed a million dollars!
Student Success
The overall student success rates in the pilot OER-based
courses was 9% higher than the overall success rate for the
equivalent textbook-based courses!
16. The Development and Use of OER Materials
by Community College and High School
Faculty
Jane Rosecrans, Faculty
J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College
jrosecrans@reynolds.edu
Reynolds’ Advance College
Academy (ACA) and OER
Initiative
17. Overview
• Community college and high school faculty
developing Open Educational Resources
(OER)
• Led by a college Facilitator
• Eleven (11) JSRCC faculty members serving as
content specialists for General Education
Certificate courses.
• ACA initiative is led by a full-time Director
• Seven (7) faculty liaisons representing the
disciplines that make up the AS in Social
Sciences Curriculum
• Thirteen (13) high school faculty members
18. Project Innovation
High school and community college faculty
from a variety of disciplines form“OER
Community“to:
• collect and curate materials to be used in
specific courses
• create new materials to fill gaps
• contextualize all materials to align with
course outcomes; and
• construct syllabi and course materials for
use in online and face-to-face teaching.
19. OER and VCCS Materials
• Using the mapping guide developed by
Lumen Learning
– Requires faculty to connect course learning
outcomes with OER resources
• High school faculty forced to develop their
own materials from reserves they have on
hand and new online sources (OER)
• Faculty in math, biology, history, and
student development have opted for open
textbooks
20. OER and VCCS Materials
• Faculty in composition have used materials
from OER courses the VCCS has developed
over the past two years
• Faculty in literature have put together their
own courses using links to literary readings
and audio-visual materials found online
21. Portability
• Portability is complex for both high school and
college faculty.
• ACA courses: course materials need to be
portable from instructor to instructor given the
lack of funding for printed textbooks.
• For Reynolds faculty:
– Several disciplines at the college that have turned
to OER favor open textbooks to other forms of
OER.
– Faculty who have pulled together OER materials
from VCCS courses and their own online links to
readings and websites, the issue of portability is
more difficult.
22. Portability
• For ENG 111-112 and literature
courses it is difficult for instructors to
access materials without a central
commons.
• A team of Reynolds faculty will
develop an OER anthology of
American Literature
• Anthology will be openly available on
Lumen Learning’s Candela platform
23. Just start somewhere
OER at a Germanna Community
College
Cheryl Huff, English Department Chair
Germanna Community College
chuff@germanna.edu
26. But it was purely grassroots...
Fig. 3. Mayne, Paul. Wheat Grass. Digital image. FLICKR. N.p., 28 May 2005. Web. 16 Oct. 2014. <https://www.flickr.com/photos/paulm/16106254/>.
29. We have avoided having a
committee...
Fig.6."Camel." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 16 Oct. 2014. Web. 16 Oct. 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camel>.
30. We are now intrinsically linked to other
VCCS initiatives...
Fig. 7 Evans, Luke. Three Musketeers in 3D. Fancarpet. 2011. Web. 14 October 2014.
http://www.thefancarpet.com/ActorGalleryPicture.aspx?mga_id=124485&a_id=3570
34. CHALLENGES
• The overall percentage of faculty adoption
is relatively low.
• Limited access to data on OER use and
impact.
• Need an OER Commons
• OER adoption has yet to scale in a broad,
systemic way by a large postsecondary
system like the Virginia Community College
System.
39. Z x 23 Project
William & Flora Hewlett Foundation
40. Z x 23 Project
1. 50,000 students will successfully
complete Z degree courses at fifteen
(15) VCCS colleges.
2. Establish a model for sustaining and
supporting the z courses and other OER
infrastructure.
3. Create a detailed “roadmap” to for
postsecondary institutions interested in
scaling and sustaining a statewide or
system OER infrastructure.
41. Attribution
1. “The Future of Books” by Johan Larsson is licensed under CC BY 2.0
2. “iPad” by Sean MacEntee is licensed under CC BY 2.0
3. “NASA Visualization Explorer Now Available For All iOS Devices”, NASA
is licensed under CC BY 2.0
4. "Planking in bookstore" by Erin! Nekervis is licensed under CC BY 2.0
5. “"Girl sitting at desk flipping through textbook pages at Putnam School"
by Library and Archives Canada is licensed under CC BY 2.0
6. "No luggage" by Tom Magliery is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
Editor's Notes
Virginia’s community colleges have been national leaders in the use of OER to reduce the cost of textbooks. Over the past 3 years, the VCCS has supported a number of successful OER-related initiatives:
For Reynolds faculty, the issue of portability depends on the discipline. Several disciplines at the college that have turned to OER favor open textbooks to other forms of OER. Faculty who have pulled together OER materials from VCCS courses and their own online links to readings and websites, the issue of portability is more difficult. ENG 111-112 and literature courses follow this model, making it difficult for instructors to access materials already developed without some sort of central repository. In part to rectify this for one set of courses – American literature I and II – a team of Reynolds faculty will undertake an OER anthology of American Literature from 1600-present over the course of two academic years beginning in the fall of 2015. This anthology will be housed by Lumen Learning using their Candela platform, making this material available to a wide audience.
For Reynolds faculty, the issue of portability depends on the discipline. Several disciplines at the college that have turned to OER favor open textbooks to other forms of OER. Faculty who have pulled together OER materials from VCCS courses and their own online links to readings and websites, the issue of portability is more difficult. ENG 111-112 and literature courses follow this model, making it difficult for instructors to access materials already developed without some sort of central repository. In part to rectify this for one set of courses – American literature I and II – a team of Reynolds faculty will undertake an OER anthology of American Literature from 1600-present over the course of two academic years beginning in the fall of 2015. This anthology will be housed by Lumen Learning using their Candela platform, making this material available to a wide audience.
Many of us were losing faith in textbooks and using the wealth of materials available to either replace or supplement. Why have publishers control your content? Why feel guilty that students were forced to by a book that limits content?
Much like the beginning of online instructional development, OER was starting with scrappy outliers
In 2012, the VCCS Chancellor funded design of the 12 highest enrollment courses. I was already doing a very OER 112, and applying felt like cheating, but I did. I won ENG112. We had two days f2f to collaborate and consultants from LUMEN Learn, which was invaluable. I brought what I learned to back to GCC. For awhile, not much happened. Then Richard came to speak to faculty and some faculty woke up to the possibilities.
We applied for more grant money for a workshop last spring, invited folks across the VCCS, and Richard Sebastian, Preston Davis. Collaboration is key in OER.
My favorite saying, “A camel is a horse designed by a committee.” We’d rather go at this differently.
Joining forces and collaborating improves OER development exponentially. The second iteration of grants has broadened the swathe. Now we have a variety of modalities happening: creating materials, finding materials, sharing materials, focusing all faculty on adopting OER resources partially or totally. Our goals now include a Gen Ed Certificate that can be earned completely OER, and then Gen Ed degree. But the faculty are driving the curriculum.
The best movements start with a few outliers, and evolve. Just starting somewhere will lead you all kinds of places…
Challenges: What’s wrong with this picture?
Why it’s tricky.
Expanding and growing our textbook rental program offers the greatest savings to our students:
50% of the cost of a new textbook
25% less than the cost of a used textbook
If on “National List”, no time commitment
For all other textbooks, faculty must commit to use the book for four regular semesters or two years
Follett incentive to grow rental textbook options
For 50% of texts - Additional 1% commission
For 75% of texts - Additional 2% commission