Sample Optimization Drivetest report

MTN - Nokia MS Performance | 2017-11-03 | Page 1 (5)
ENUGU CLUSTER REPORT
4TH MARCH, 2018

› Region – ENUGU.
› Cluster Name – Enugu Report
› Drive test done – 25/27 FEB, 2018.
› DT Tool version - TEMs investigation16.3.4
› DT model –
› LAPTOP 1 LAPTOP 2
› MS1 on 2G SC (Dedicated mode) >MS1 on 3G SC (Dedicated mode)
› MS2 on 2G LC (Dedicated mode) >MS2 on 3G LC (Dedicated mode)
› MS3 on IRAT SC (Dedicated mode) >MS3 on 3G FTP DL
› MS4 on IRAT LC (Dedicated mode) >MS4 on 3G FTP UL
› MS5 on 2G DATA >MS5 on 3G HTTP
summary

2g performance
› KPIs Summary
› Observations & Recommendations
› Rx level,,
› Rx Quality
› SQI & SQI MOS plot
› Frequency band
› Performance analysis

KPI’s summary
2G DEDICATED MODE
KPIs_ Short Call Unit Jan-18 Feb-18
Call Initiation - 742 678
Call Attempts - 725 660
Call Setup Success - 700 648
Call Setup Success rate % 96.55 98.18
Blocked Calls - 25 12
Blocked Call rate % 3.45 1.82
Total Location Update Requests - 103 101
Total Location Update Success - 103 100
Location Update Success rate % 100.00 99.01
KPIs_Long Call Unit Jul-00 Feb-18
Call Established - 185 169
Dropped Calls - 14 15
Dropped Call rate % 7.57 8.88
Total Handover Attempts - 669 593
Total Handover Success - 654 580
Handover Success rate % 97.76 97.81
Total Location Update Requests - 70 68
Total Location Update Success - 70 68
Location Update Success rate % 100.00 100.00
Drive Test KPI Jan-18 Feb-18
2G Call Setup Success Rate (Speech) 96.55 98.18
2G Block Call Rate (Speech) 3.45 1.82
2G Drop Call Rate (Speech) 7.57 8.88
2G Handover Success Rate (Speech) 97.76 97.81
2G Coverage Reliability (RxLev >
-95dBm) 97.38 98.04
2G Voice Quality (RxQual <=4) 87.07 87.42
2G Voice Drive Test POLQA(dBQ) NA NA
2G Voice Drive Test POLQA MOS NA NA
2G Call Setup Time in Sec 7.92 7.67
% 2G Call Setup Time in Sec <=5s 72.81 82.04
RLC Throughput_Kbps (MEAN) 51.31 52.13
% Throughput >= 128kbps 7.67 8.10
EGPRS Attach success Rate 97.16 98.52
PDP context activation success rate 100.00 100.00

Observations & Recommendations
OBSERVATIONS:
1.Poor Quality on EN0149A was due to Handover problem between EN0149A and EN0210C
2.Poor Quality on EN4966A was due to Handover problem between EN4966A and EN0185A
3.Poor Quality on a distant server EN0525A (2km) caused by poor no dominance
4.Poor Quality on EN0900C was due to excessive pathloss on EN0103A
5.Poor Quality on T4663C was due to Handover problem between T4663C and EN0187C
6.Poor Quality on T4649B was due to Handover problem between T4649B and EN0695B
7.Poor Quality on T4675A was due to Handover problem between T4675A and EN0171A
RECOMMNEDATIONS:
1.Check neighbor relation,handover threashold and time to trigger between cell EN0149A and EN0210C
2.Check neighbor relation, handover threshold and time to trigger between cell EN4966A and EN0185A
3.Validate coordinate and azimuth of EN0525A and make dominant
4.Check cell EN0103A for VSWR alarm, Electically Uptilt cell EN0103A by 3 degrees
5.Check neighbor relation, handover threshold and time to trigger between cell T4663C and EN0187C
6.Check neighbor relation, handover threshold and time to trigger between cell T4649B and EN0695B
7.Check neighbor relation, handover threshold and time to trigger between cell T4675A and EN0171A

OVERVIEW AREA

2G DEDICATED :RX LEV plot
RXLEV FEBRXLEV JAN

2G :RX LEV plot
RX LEVEL STATUS JAN-18
Rx Level Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[-70, Max] 8444 32.71% 32.71%
87.96% Good[-81, -70] 11697 45.31% 78.02%
[-85, -81] 2566 9.94% 87.96%
[-95, -85] 2430 9.41% 97.38% 9.41%Acceptable
[-110, -95] 677 2.62% 100.00%
2.62% Bad
[Min, -110] 0 0.00% 100.00%
RX LEVEL STATUS FEB-18
Rx Level Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[-70, Max] 6847 29.14% 29.14%
87.83% Good[-81, -70] 11506 48.97% 78.11%
[-85, -81] 2284 9.72% 87.83%
[-95, -85] 2400 10.21% 98.04% 10.21%Acceptable
[-110, -95] 460 1.96% 100.00%
1.96% Bad
[Min, -110] 0 0.00% 100.00%

2G DEDICATED :RXQUAL plot
RXQUAL FEBRXQUAL JAN

2G :RX qual plot
RX QUALITY STATUS JAN-18
Rx Quality Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
0,2 13993 71.97% 71.97%
92.18% Good2,4 3057 15.72% 87.70%
4,5 872 4.49% 92.18%
5,6 648 3.33% 95.51% 3.33%Acceptable
6,7 519 2.67% 98.18%
4.49%
Bad7,8 353 1.82% 100.00%
RX QUALITY STATUS FEB-18
Rx Quality Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
0,2 13411 70.77 70.77
92.07 Good2,4 3154 16.64 87.42
4,5 882 4.65 92.07
5,6 593 3.13 95.20 3.13 Acceptable
6,7 518 2.73 97.94
4.80
Bad7,8 391 2.06 100.00

2G DEDICATED : CELL ID plot
CELL ID FEBCELL ID JAN

2G DEDICATED :RX QUAL plot
Poor Quality on a distant
server EN0525A (2km)
caused by poor no
dominance P3
Poor Quality on
EN0149A was due to
Handover problem
between EN0149A
and EN0210C P1
Poor Quality on T4649B
was due to Handover
problem between T4649B
and EN0695B. P6
Poor Quality on T4675A
was due to Handover
problem between T4675A
and EN0171A P7
Poor Quality on EN4966A
was due to Handover
problem between
EN4966A and EN0185A
P2
Poor Quality on EN0900C
was due to excessive
pathloss on EN0103A. P4
Poor Quality on T4663C
was due to Handover
problem between T4663C
and EN0187C P5

2G EVENT FAILURE PLOT
RXLEV EVENT FEBRXLEV EVENT JAN

2G HTTP-THROUGHPUT plot
HTTP FEBHTTP JAN

Wcdma
performance
long CALL
› KPIs Summary
› Site distribution & Drive route
› RSCP & Ecno plot
› CQI & SQI MOS plot
› UE TX power
› PSC plot
› Event failure plot & analysis

OBSERVATIONS:
1.Poor coverage due to poor coverage from distance server 6315GB(10Km) on highway
2.Poor Quality and Poor coverage from distant site 4699GC (7.99km)
3.Poor EcNo caused by Pilot pollution and missing neighbor on 4675GA
4.Poor EcNo caused by missing neighbor between EN0397W and EN0171U,EN0436V ,6331GB and 4675GB
5.Poor EcNo caused by missing neighbor between 4614GF and EN0429X,EN0292X
6.Poor EcNo caused by pilot pollution and missing neighbor between EN0060W and EN0292U
7.Poor EcNo caused by missing neighbor between EN0397W and EN0171U,EN0436V ,6331GB and 4675GB
8.Poor EcNo caused by missing neighbor between EN0682Z and EN0106Z,EN0395Z ,6329GF
9.Poor EcNo caused by poor UL coverage on 6328GF
10.Poor EcNo caused by missing neighbor between EN0171X and EN1313Z
11.Poor EcNo caused by missing neighbor between EN0049V and EN0407W
12.Poor EcNo caused by missing neighbor between EN0014V and EN0695W/ EN0695V
13.Poor EcNo caused by missing neighbor between 179GF and EN0015Y,4618GJ ,EN0015S and 6320GF
14.Poor EcNo caused by poor coverage on EN0517V at 3km,closest Site EN0032 appears off Air During DT
15.Poor EcNo caused by poor coverage from EN0210Z at 5km
16.RECOMMNEDATIONS:
17.New site required if necessary as no much customer along the highway
18.Location is in a remote area which needed no site
19.Review neighbor relation between 4675GA and EN1335V,EN0086U and EN0060O
20.Review neighbor relation between EN0397W and EN0171U,EN0436V ,6331GB and 4675GB.
21.Review neighbor relation between 4614GF and EN0429X,EN0292X
22.Review neighbor relation between EN0060W and EN0292U
23.Review neighbor relation between EN0397W and EN0171U,EN0436V ,6331GB and 4675GB
24.Review neighbor relation between EN0682Z and EN0106Z,EN0395Z ,6329GF
25.Check for possible UL user congestion on 6328GF
26.Review neighbor relation between EN0171X and EN1313Z
27.Review neighbor relation between EN0049V and EN0407W.
28.Review neighbor relation between EN0014V and EN0695W/ EN0695V.
29.Review neighbor relation between 179GF and EN0015Y,4618GJ ,EN0015S and 6320GF
30.Check availability trend on site EN0032 and restore
31.Location is in remote area, hence needs no new site
Observations & Recommendations

KPI’s summary
3G DEDICATED MODE
KPIs_ Short Call Unit Jan-18 Feb-18
KPIs_Long Call Unit Jan-18 Feb-18
Call Established - 179 156
Dropped Calls - 5 6
Total SHO Attempts - 8884 7875
Total SHO Success - 8557 7618
SHO Success rate % 96.32 96.74
Radio link addition - 2589 2317
RRC Connection Success
rate
% 98.56 99.13
HSDPA FTP DL Throughput Kbps 1860.18 2002.01
HSUPA FTP UL Throughput Kbps 947.68 1125.5
% 3G Call Setup Success Rate (Speech) 96.86 99.33
% 3G Block Call Rate (Speech) 3.24 0.67
% 3G Drop Call Rate (Speech) 2.79 3.85
% 3G Soft Handover Success Rate (Speech) 96.32 96.74
% 3G Coverage Reliability (RSCP > -95dBm) 91.44 97.13
% 3G Voice Quality (Ec/No > -10) 49.14 42.73
3G Speech Quality (SQI) NA NA
3G Voice Drive Test POLQA MOS >=3.5 NA NA
3G Call Setup Time in Sec 5.98 5.78
% 3G Call Setup time < =6 s 87.89 90.12
3G Voice Drive Test POLQA MOS >=3.5 NA NA
% 3G HSDPA HTTP DL throughput >= 2 Mbps 32.5 37.68
% 3G HSDPA HTTP UL throughput >=0.5 Mbps 63.48 78.91
% 3G Data Sessions over 2Mbps 98% 1.62 2.34
3G HTTP Browsing Time (Kepler Ref. Page
Download) 1.4s 1.65 1.78

3G DEDICATED : RSCP plot
RSCP POSTRSCP PRE

3G : RSCP plot
RSCP FEB
RSCP JAN
CPICH RSCP STATUS JAN-18
RSCP Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[-75, Max] 9872 35.66% 35.66%
91.44%Good[-85, -75] 10888 39.33% 74.99%
[-95, -85] 4553 16.45% 91.44%
[-105, -95] 1458 5.27% 96.71% 5.27%Acceptable
[-115, -105] 871 3.15% 99.85%
3.29% Bad
[Min, -115] 41 0.15% 100.00%
CPICH RSCP STATUS FEB-18
RSCP Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[-75, Max] 16191 71.13% 71.13%
97.13%Good[-85, -75] 4598 20.20% 91.33%
[-95, -85] 1321 5.80% 97.13%
[-105, -95] 381 1.67% 98.81% 1.67%Acceptable
[-115, -105] 239 1.05% 99.86%
1.19% Bad
[Min, -115] 33 0.14% 100.00%

3G DEDICATED : ECNO plot
ECNO FEBECNO JAN

3G : ECNO STATUS
ECNO FEBRUARY
ECNO JANUARY
CPICH EC/NO STATUS JAN-18
ECNO Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[-8 , Max] 8900 32.15% 32.15%
68.33% Good[-10 , -8] 4704 16.99% 49.14%
[-12 , -10] 5313 19.19% 68.33%
[-14 , -12] 4483 16.19% 84.52% 16.19%Acceptable
[-16 , -14] 2512 9.07% 93.59%
15.48%
Bad[Min , -16] 1774 6.41% 100.00%
CPICH EC/NO STATUS FEB-18
ECNO Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[-8 , Max] 6060 26.62% 26.62%
63.92% Good[-10 , -8] 3667 16.11% 42.73%
[-12 , -10] 4823 21.19% 63.92%
[-14 , -12] 4256 18.70% 82.62% 18.70%Acceptable
[-16 , -14] 2366 10.39% 93.01%
17.38%
Bad[Min , -16] 1591 6.99% 100.00%

ECNO BAD PATCH
Poor coverage due to poor
coverage from distance
server 6315GB(10Km) on
highway P1
Poor Quality and Poor coverage
from distant site 4699GC
(7.99km) P2
Poor EcNo caused by missing
neighbor between EN0397W and
EN0171U,EN0436V ,6331GB
and 4675GB P4
Poor EcNo caused by Pilot
pollution and missing neighbor on
4675GA P3

ECNO BAD PATCHPoor EcNo caused by
missing neighbor between
4614GF and
EN0429X,EN0292X P5
EcNo caused by poor UL
rage on 6328GF P9
Poor EcNo caused by missing
neighbor between EN0171X and
EN1313Z P10
cNo caused by pilot
n and missing
or between EN0060W
N0292U P6
EcNo caused by
ing neighbor between
397W and
171U,EN0436V ,
GB and 4675GBP7
Poor EcNo caused by
EN0049V and EN0407W
P11
or EcNo caused by
ssing neighbor between
N0682Z and
N0106Z,EN0395Z ,
29GF P8
Poor EcNo caused by
EN0014V and EN0695W/
EN0695V P12
Poor EcNo caused by
179GF and

ECNO BAD PATCH
Poor EcNo caused by poor
coverage on EN0517V at
3km,closest Site EN0032
appears off Air During DT
P14
EcNo caused by poor
rage from EN0210Z at
P15

3G : UE TX POWER plot
UE TX POWER
FEB
UE TX POWER
JAN

3G : UE TX POWER STATUS
UE TX POWER FEB
UE TX POWER JAN
TX POWER STATUS JAN-18
Tx power Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[-30 , Min] 547 2.65% 2.65%
81.87% Good
[-30, -20] 3597 17.41% 20.06%
[-20 , -10] 7229 35.00% 55.06%
[-10 , 0] 5539 26.81% 81.87%
[0 , 10] 2505 12.13% 94.00% 12.13% Acceptable
[10 , 20] 923 4.47% 98.47%
6.00%
Bad[Max , 20] 317 1.53% 100.00%
TX POWER STATUS FEB-18
Tx power Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[-30 , Min] 304 1.68 1.68
77.17 Good
[-30, -20] 2003 11.08 12.76
[-20 , -10] 5531 30.59 43.35
[-10 , 0] 6115 33.82 77.17
[0 , 10] 2991 16.54 93.71 16.54Acceptable
[10 , 20] 789 4.36 98.07
6.29
Bad[Max , 20] 349 1.93 100.00

3G DEDICATED : SERVING CELL plot
PSC FEB
PSC JAN

3G EVENT FAILURE plot
EVENT FEBEVENT JAN

irat performance
long CALL
› KPIs Summary
› Site distribution & Drive route
› Rx level, Rx Quality, RSCP & Ecno plot
› SQI, CQI, SQI MOS plot
› Cell ID & PSC plot
› Event failure plot & analysis

KPI’s summary
IRAT DEDICATED MODE
KPIs IRAT LC Unit Jan-18 Feb-18
Dropped Calls - 9 10
Total Handover
Attempts
- 94 82
Total Handover Success - 93 81
Handover Success rate % 98.94 98.78
Total SHO Attempts - 7363 6688
Total SHO Success - 7140 6509
SHO Success rate % 96.97 97.32
IRAT Call Setup Success Rate (Speech) 91.41 95.35
IRAT Block Call Rate (Speech) 8.59 4.65
IRAT Drop Call Rate (Speech) 4.97 6.10
IRAT Handover Success Rate (Speech) 2G 98.94 98.78
IRAT Soft Handover Success Rate (Speech) 3G 96.97 97.32
IRAT Coverage Reliability (RX LEV/RSCP >
-95dBm) 96.24/90.89 97.51/92.55
IRAT Voice Quality (RxQual/ECNO < 4/-10)
72.65/40.43 79.86/44.02
IRAT Speech Quality (SQI) NA NA
IRAT Speech Quality (MOS) NA NA
IRAT Call Setup Time in Sec 6.5 6.21

IRAT : RX LEV & RSCP plot
RXLEV RSCP

IRAT : RX QUAL & ECNO plot
RXQUAL ECNO

IRAT CELL ID & PSC PLOT

irat mode EVENT FAILURE plot

DATA
performance
› KPIs Summary
› FTP DL Throughput Plot
› FTP DL HS CQI
› FTP DL BLER
› FTP DL HS SCCH Channelization
› FTP UL Throughput Plot
› HTTP Throughput Plot

3G ftp DL-HS DSCH plot
HS DSCH FEBHS DSCH JAN

3G HS DSCH STATUS
FTP THROUGHPUT STATUS JAN-18
THROUGHPUT Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[Max, 4096] 699 9.73 9.73
66.38% Good[4096, 2048] 1708 23.77 33.50
[2048, 1024] 2363 32.88 66.38
[1024, 512] 1462 20.35 86.72
29.21% Acceptable
[512, 256] 637 8.86 95.59
[128, 256] 179 2.49 98.08
4.41% Bad[128, 0] 138 1.92 100.00
[Min, 0] 0 0.00 100.00
FTP THROUGHPUT STATUS FEB-18
THROUGHPUT Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[Max, 4096] 1064 10.41 10.41
69.92 Good[4096, 2048] 2788 27.27 37.68
[2048, 1024] 3296 32.24 69.92
[1024, 512] 1818 17.78 87.70
26.51 Acceptable
[512, 256] 892 8.73 96.43
[128, 256] 209 2.04 98.47
3.57 Bad[128, 0] 156 1.53 100.00
[Min, 0] 0 0.00 100.00

3G hs phy requested throughput total
HS DSCH FEBHS DSCH JAN

3G hs phy requested throughput total
3G HS- DSCH THROUGHPUT STATUS JAN-18
THROUGHPUT
Range
Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[Max, 4096] 1183 8.54 8.54
32.91 Good[4096, 2048] 1737 12.54 21.08
[2048, 1024] 1638 11.83 32.91
[1024, 512] 1274 9.20 42.11
15.20 Acceptable
[512, 256] 832 6.01 48.11
[128, 256] 475 3.43 51.54
51.89 Bad[128, 0] 6712 48.46 100.00
[Min, 0] 0 0.00 100.00
3G HS- DSCH THROUGHPUT STATUS FEB-18
THROUGHPUT
Range
Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[Max, 4096] 1873 12.64 12.64
48.17 Good[4096, 2048] 2685 18.11 30.75
[2048, 1024] 2582 17.42 48.17
[1024, 512] 1693 11.42 59.59
17.89 Acceptable
[512, 256] 959 6.47 66.06
[128, 256] 538 3.63 69.69
33.94 Bad[128, 0] 4492 30.31 100.00
[Min, 0] 0 0.00 100.00

3G FTP DL- HS CQI plot
HS CQI FEBHS CQI JAN

CQI OF HSDPA STATUS
CQI STATUS JAN-18
CQI Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[25, Max] 2527 18.26 18.26
74.03 Good
[15, 25] 7717 55.77 74.03
[0, 15] 3593 25.97 100.00 25.97 Acceptable
[Min, 0] 0 0.00 100.00
0.00 Bad
CQI STATUS
FEB-18
CQI Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[25, Max] 2126 14.36 14.36
73.65 Good
[15, 25] 8780 59.29 73.65
[0, 15] 3902 26.35 100.00 26.35 Acceptable
[Min, 0] 0 0.00 100.00
0.00 Bad

HSDPA 64QAM
HS 64 QAM FEBHS 64 QAM JAN

HSDPA 64QAM
64QAM STATUS JAN-18
64QAM RANGE Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[80,max] 8874 70.62 70.62
89.30 Good
[60,80] 2346 18.67 89.30
[40,60] 1329 10.58 99.87
10.70 Acceptable
[20,40] 16 0.13 100.00
[min,20] 0 0.00 100.00 0.00 Bad
64QAM STATUS FEB-18
64QAM RANGE Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[80,max] 2296 30.19 30.19
75.77 Good
[60,80] 3467 45.58 75.77
[40,60] 1825 23.99 99.76
24.23 Acceptable
[20,40] 18 0.24 100
[min,20] 0 0.00 100 0.00 Bad

HSDPA FTP UL JAN
3G FTP UL- THROUGHPUT plot
HSDPA FTP UL FEB

3G FTP DL- BLER plot
HSDPA BLER JAN HSDPA BLER FEB

HS SCCH JAN
3G FTP DL- HS SCCH CHANNELIZATION CODE plot
HS SCCH FEB

HS DSCH FEB
3G HTTP-HSDPA plot
HS DSCH JAN

ANALYSIS plot & EMBENDED FILE
Microsoft Excel
97-2003 Worksheet
Microsoft Word
97 - 2003 Document

Thank you!!!

Sample Optimization Drivetest report

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to Sample Optimization Drivetest report

Recently uploaded

Sample Optimization Drivetest report