SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Running head: RESEARCH PAPER
1
RESEARCH PAPER 15
Assessment of the knowledge, practice, and the associated
factors of Healthcare Acquired Infection Prevention
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
Table of Contents
Table of Contents 2
Assessment of the knowledge, practice, and the associated
factors of Healthcare Acquired Infection Prevention in
Blessings Healthcare Facility 4
The Problem 5
Significance of the problem 6
Purpose of this study 7
Research Questions 8
Masters Essentials aligned with the topic 8
Design 10
Literature Review 10
Methodology and the design of the study 13
Sampling Methods 14
Necessary tools 14
Any logarithm or flow map developed 15
Healthcare Facility 15
Implementation 15
Stage 1: Assessment of the current practices (One Week) 16
Stage 2: Identification of the factors leading to high cases of
healthcare-acquired infection (5 days) 17
Stage 3: Pre-Training (Two Weeks) 17
Stage 4: Training (5 weeks) 17
Stage 5: an ongoing process of assessing the situation 18
Materials, activities and the cost 20
Results 21
Socio-demographics features of the research population 21
Knowledge concerning the infection prevention 23
Aspects related to the knowledge of the healthcare professionals
regarding the issue of preventing healthcare-acquired infections
27
Limitation of the study 28
References 30
Assessment of the knowledge, practice, and the associated
factors of Healthcare Acquired Infection Prevention
Healthcare acquired infection/nosocomial
infection/hospital acquired infections are becoming a major
international challenge in many healthcare facilities especially
in the low or middle income nations. It is anticipated that
around 10 percent of patients in the healthcare facilities from
developing nations are developing healthcare acquired
infections and this subsequently leads to negative impacts on
healthcare outcomes. It also leads to increase hospital stay,
economic burden, morbidity cases, and increase in the mortality
incidences. Some of the common healthcare acquired infections
include Hepatitis B and C virus, HIV infections, and even
Tuberculosis which are often transmitted by healthcare workers
who are not observing the practice related to the infection
prevention measures.
According to the United States Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, there are about 1.7 million patients who
have been hospitalized as a result of acquiring infection within
the facilities while undergoing treatment for other healthcare
concerns. Many studies reveal that simple infection control
procedures like cleaning of the hands using alcohol-based hand
rub is helping in the prevention of the spread of the disease.
The increase in the infection rate caused by the healthcare
acquired infection is due to the poor practices of infection
prevention and control, lack of knowledge or failure to
implement knowledge related to the process of preventing and
controlling nosocomial illnesses, and other associated factors
(Desta, Ayenew, Sitotaw, Tegegne, Dires, & Getie, 2018). The
Problem
The high burden of nosocomial infections is as a result of
the absent of the standardized infection control prevention
program in place. The main reason why there is absence of
standardized infection prevention procedures is as a result of
inadequate resources, improper sanitary situation and the poor
hygienic practices. Healthcare infections which were absence at
time when a patient is being admitted are acquired by patients
during the process of healthcare services within the hospital.
Healthcare providers are considered to be in the front line with
regard to the process of ensuring that there is self protection as
well as making sure that patients are free from infections
(Haque, Sartelli, McKimm, & Bakar, 2018).
The process of preventing infection prevention is
involving and it involves the placing of major barriers between
the vulnerable hosts and the pathogens as well as some of the
major components of the safe and improved quality of services
being delivered at the healthcare facility level. Therefore,
healthcare acquired infections related mortality and morbidity
can be prevented through having an effective prevention
program such as proper hand hygiene. The process of
implementing the standard precautions such as safety injections,
isolations precautions, bathing among patients, antibiotic use or
stewardship, vaccinations, environmental cleaning,
disinfections, and the sterilization process through successful
comprehensive departmental based safety program as well as
surveillance are important steps which can be relied on for the
purposes of control and prevention of the infections.
In resource constraint facilities, it is becoming hard to
control infections rates of clients who are acquiring healthcare
infections as well as the exposure of healthcare workers to such
infections. There are some of simple standard precaution
procedures as well as improved knowledge which have been
found to be important when it comes to the reduction of the
infections. Even though there is existence of such evidences in
relation to availability of the level of awareness and practices in
preventing infections and the associated aspects, there are
reduced cases of exploiting such knowledge, practices, and the
associated factors many healthcare facilities. Significance
of the problem
Low-cost intervention processes are available to help in
preventing or controlling the cases of nosocomial infections.
Majority of healthcare knowledge as well as adherence to the
infection prevention is still very minimal. This therefore
implies that improvement of knowledge as well as practice of
healthcare employees with regard to the prevention of infection
is important when it comes to the reduction of the burden
caused by the healthcare acquired infections. The outcomes of
this research work will be important as an contribution for the
policy makers, programmers, and healthcare employees towards
improvement of the clinical services and the means of achieving
sustainable development objectives.
Identification of this problem is also important when it
comes to the reduction of the mortality cases. The study of this
problem is helping in the generation of the meaningful data with
regard to the practices, knowledge, and other associated factors
of healthcare acquired infections. This is important in
processing the measuring the outcome of the patient safety
practices. Through monitoring the process and the outcome
measures as well as the evaluation of the existing relationship is
important in establishing the good process which results in good
health care outcomes.
Through identification of the problem related to the
knowledge, practices and the associated factors in healthcare
acquired infections, it is possible to have an effective process
measure which is giving a reflection of the common practices
which can be applied in healthcare setting. It enables the
facility to make a selection of the outcome measures related to
the occurrence, harshness, and the preventability of the outcome
proceedings. It is estimated that over 1.7 million patients are
suffering from the nosocomial infections in the United States.
The overall direct cost of infections to healthcare facility is
ranging between $ 28 billion to $ 45 billion.
Even though this range appears to be wider, healthcare
acquired infections seem to be expensive. Additionally, some of
these diseases are preventable; nevertheless, few healthcare
facilities are still faced with the problem of controlling the
issue. Therefore, identification of the gap with regard to the
control of healthcare acquired infections is important in
reducing its rate thus helping the nation and healthcare facilities
to reduce the expenditures on treatment of the patients with
nosocomial infections. The increased expenditure by the clients
or the government is also associated with longer stay in the
hospital due to the re-infection (Stone, 2017). Purpose of this
study
This study is therefore aimed at investigating the
knowledge as well as the routine practices aimed at preventing
of the hospital associated infection and its associated factors of
preventing infection amongst healthcare providers. The outcome
of this study is important towards development and
implementation of the policies to help in addressing the existing
gaps that is present in addressing issues of hospital associated
infections.Research Questions
This study will be guided by the following questions to help in
meeting the objectives or the purpose of the study. These
questions include:
· What are some of the prevention practices in place to help in
the control of healthcare acquired infections?
· What is the knowledge of the healthcare providers with regard
to the prevention and control of healthcare acquired infections?
· What are the associated factors with the knowledge of
healthcare providers regarding the infection prevention?
Masters Essentials aligned with the topic
One of the most important essential with regard to the
process of preventing nosocomial infections is the quality
improvement and safety. Improvement in the quality of
healthcare services as well as safety of the patients is an
ongoing process within every department of the hospitals. It is
important for the mastered prepared nurse to have the ability of
articulating the techniques, equipment, the performance of
measures, culture of the safety values, and the standards related
to quality, and should be prepared to use quality principles in
the organization. It also requires nurses to be an agent of
change. The issues of hospital associated infections are
becoming a major concern in many healthcare facilities. In
order to overcome the challenges faced in ensuring that there is
minimization of nosocomial infections, joint effort is required
from both healthcare providers particularly nurses who are
continuously interacting directly with the nurses to help in the
reduction of the issue. Joint forces are needed to have a change
in the practice as well as share the knowledge needed to help in
reducing healthcare acquired infections.
Another important essential is the health policy and
advocacy. There is a continuous change in the healthcare sector
and this is influenced by the technological, economic, political,
and the social-cultural aspects. Graduate master’s degree
nursing program is having a requisite knowledge as well as
skills needed towards promotion of health, helping in shaping
the healthcare delivery, and the advancement of the values such
as social justice through processing of policies processes and
advocacy. As advocates, it is the responsibility of healthcare
providers such as nurses to ensure that there is a change in the
way through which the issue nosocomial infections is dealt
with. Nurses and other healthcare providers need to look for
alternative approaches through advocating for the new policies
and incorporate them into healthcare system within the
organization. Nurses have to be responsible towards making an
improvement to the quality of healthcare delivery through
understanding the political determinants of the system as well
as using the knowledge learned in the class work to advocate for
the change in the healthcare provision policies related to the
prevention of hospital associated infections.
Collaboration towards making an improvement to the
patients and population healthcare outcomes is another
important essential. Healthcare providers must work together
towards ensuring that the implementation processes of the new
policies related to the prevention of infection is achieved.
Design Literature Review
Healthcare acquired infections constitute a major public
health issue and it is affecting millions of people on a yearly
basis. The approximation from the recent studies is showing
more than 5 percent of the hospitalized patients are exposed to
nosocomial infections. Many studies further shows that the
surgical site infections are the common infections associated
with nosocomial infections and it is contributing to about 30
percent of all healthcare acquired infections cases.
Study by Ayed et al (2015) shows that healthcare
providers are continuously exposed to pathogens which are
sometimes severe and lethal. Nurses specifically are more
exposed to different infections during the course of providing
healthcare services to the patients. This study indicates that it is
therefore crucial for nurses to possess sound knowledge as well
as strict adherence to the infection control practices. Updating
the acquaintance and the practices of nurses through
involvement in ongoing in-service educational programs and
putting more focus on the role of the current evidence-based
practices of infection prevention in the continuous training is
important. Provision of the training to the newly recruited
nurses regarding the infection control frequently as well as
replicating the study through observation checklist is necessary
in assessing the level of practice (Imad, Ayed, Faeda, & Lubna,
2015).
Study by Desta et al (2018) reveals that working
experience is a stronger predictor of the knowledge in relation
to the prevention of the infection. In this study, the goal was to
the relationship between the acquaintance, practice and
connected aspects of infection prevention among healthcare
employees. Education level is a key determinant to the level of
experience when it comes to the control or the prevention of
infections. According to this study, it is clear that healthcare
providers with advanced experience as well as advanced age are
significantly linked with the knowledge. This is basically based
on the fact that as healthcare providers are getting older, they
are more likely to have advance knowledge due to their
experiences as well as having worked with their seniors (Desta,
Ayenew, Sitotaw, Tegegne, Dires, & Getie, 2018).
Teshager et al (2015) also studies the knowledge,
practices, and the related aspects towards the reduction or
prevention of the surgical site infections among nurses who
were employed in Amhara Regional State Referral healthcare
facilities, in the Northwest Ethiopia. This study looked at some
of the factors linked with the knowledge of the nurses regarding
the prevention of the surgical site infections. Based on the
bivariate analysis of this study, the age, year of service, sex of
the participants, and training on the infection prevention
techniques were found to be the key factors associated with the
knowledge on the prevention of infections. On the other hand,
the year of service, sex, and the training on the infection
prevention were found to be greatly linked to the multivariate
assessment (Teshager, Engeda, & Worku, 2015).
Based on the outcome of the analysis, males nurses are
three time more likely to be knowledgeable on the prevention of
the surgical site infections as compared to the female
counterparts. Nurses who have served for more than five years
were twice more likely to be knowledgeable on the issue of
infection prevention as compared to the healthcare employees
who have worked for less than five years. Nurses who have been
involved in the training program related to the prevention of the
infection techniques were twice more likely to be
knowledgeable regarding the prevention of the surgical site
infections as compared to nurses who have never attended such
trainings.
Human are playing an important role in healthcare
acquired infections and therefore adequate nurse staffing is
important. Batran et al (2018) in their study on whether the
standard precautions for healthcare acquired infection among
nurses working in the public sector is satisfactory indicates that
compliance to the standard precautions by the healthcare
providers is related to their knowledge, the standards precaution
training, and the experiences they are having. Standards
precautions are used as guideline while offering healthcare
services to the patients in spite of the supposed infection status.
According to this study, the standard precautions are targeted at
reducing the transmission of the healthcare acquired infections
as well as protecting the nurses and other healthcare providers
from the sharp injuries (Batran, Ayed, Salameh, Ayoub, &
Fasfous, 2018).
Jahangir et al (2017) aimed at assessing the knowledge
and the practices of the nurses in relation to the spreading of the
healthcare acquired infections within the government healthcare
facilities in Lahore. Based on this study, it was evident that
nurses are having knowledge regarding the spread of
nosocomial infections. They are also well informed regarding
the safety precautions and the use of alcohol based formulation.
Nevertheless, their practices towards reduction of the spread of
the hospital associated infections are at unsatisfactory level.
This study also reveals that nurses are more exposed to
acquiring and transmitting hospital associated infections as they
provide nursing care to the patients. It is therefore
recommended that nurses must have adequate knowledge as well
as the practice towards controlling and preventing the spread of
nosocomial infections (Jahangir, Ali, & Riaz, 2017).
Using standardized precautions to help in the
prevention of patient from acquiring nosocomial infections is an
important part of the nursing care. Study by Moyo (2013),
reveals that many nurses are more concerned about their lives as
compared to the patients since they are handling different
patients from ward to ward. Alternatively, Ventilator patients
are more exposed to the healthcare acquired infections whereby
the contaminated equipment can be a source of those infections.
Nurses who are delivering healthcare services to these patients
are also at higher risk of acquiring illness from such equipment
(Moyo, 2013). Methodology and the design of the study
This study is an institutional based and it will therefore
be done from May 25, 2019 to June 25, 2019. Healthcare
providers having qualification of doctors, health officers,
nurses, midwives, x-ray technicians, pharmacists, and the
laboratory technicians will be selected for this study. Healthcare
providers who are ill plus those who are on leave were never
included in the study.
Self-assessed questionnaire will be utilized to help in
the collection of data through distribution at the healthcare
workers. The self-administered questionnaire was modified
CDC infection prevention and control assessment tool for the
acute care healthcare facilities. The questionnaire was
organized using English language and the pre-test was
performed in the study area on 5 percent of healthcare workers
and this was excluded from the actual study to help in
evaluation of the content as well as the approach of the
questionnaire and some necessary adjustment which were
necessary to be made.
The analysis of the data will be based on summary of
the proportions, frequencies, the average, the score on
knowledge is dichotomized as 1 for being knowledgeable and 2
for not being knowledgeable. The practice score is
dichotomized as 1 for good practice and 2 for poor practice.
Sampling Methods
A total of 250 participants will be selected as the
population participants. The participants are the healthcare
employees who are involved in the direct care of the patients for
a period of four weeks in every ward. The systematic random
sampling will be used to help in the identification of the study
participants through using the list of healthcare employees
posted in every ward in the facility as a sampling frame. The
first selection of the participant will be based on random
selection. The selection of the sample for the study is based on
using healthcare providers who are doctors, nurses, midwives,
laboratory technologists, pharmacists, and healthcare officers.
Necessary tools
One of the tools to be used in this study is the self-
administered questionnaire to help in the collection of the data.
This tool will be adapted from the modified Center for Disease
Control and Prevention and the control assessment tool used for
the acute care patients. Any logarithm or flow map developed
Healthcare Facility
Implementation
Task
Duration
Assessment of the current practices
1 week
Identification of the factors leading to high cases of healthcare-
acquired infection
5 weeks
Pre-Training
Two weeks
Training
5 weeks
Process of assessing the situation and communication with the
key stakeholders
Ongoing process
The implementation plan process of this research
project is aimed at addressing issues related to the knowledge,
practices, and other factors such as the socio-demographic
factors, and the healthcare facility factors which are considered
to be playing important roles towards the prevention of
healthcare-acquired infections. The implementation process for
the change implementation plan in reducing the healthcare-
acquired infections requires adequate resources which will be
necessary towards training the healthcare providers to have the
required knowledge needed to improve their skills in relation to
the prevention of the healthcare-acquired infections. Resources
will also be important in ensuring that the required tools or
equipment are purchased to help in ensuring that there effective
control or preventive measures in place.
Some of the important tools or equipment which will
be necessary to be purchased includes the gloves, hydrogen
peroxide, alcohol disinfectant, sterilizer machine, and the
alcohol hand disinfectant. Other resources or tools required
include pens and notebooks which will be important when
training the staffs on the safety measures in relation to the
process of preventing healthcare-acquired infections. The
implementation program towards the reduction of the
healthcare-acquired infection will be based on stages. Stage 1:
Assessment of the current practices (One Week)
The first stage will be involving the process of
assessing the current practices in place which are being used
towards a reduction of the infection rates. This stage will also
involve the assessment of the knowledge of the healthcare
providers especially nurses regarding the techniques and the
effective methods being used to help in the reduction of
infections in the facility. The assessment will also involve
looking at some of the steps which have been put in place to
help in combating the incidences of the prevention rates within
the facility. One week duration will be enough towards ensuring
that there is a complete assessment of the areas which requires
improvement.Stage 2: Identification of the factors leading to
high cases of healthcare-acquired infection (5 days)
The second stage will involve the identification of
some of the factors which are contributing to the spread of the
infection rate within the facility to help in the designing of the
effective training approaches which meets the gaps within the
facility in relation to the prevention of healthcare-acquired
infections. This stage will be taking around 5 days for
completion. Stage 3: Pre-Training (Two Weeks)
The third stage of the implementation process the pre-
training which will take about two weeks. This stage will
involve the assessment of the tools and then scheduled for the
training sessions (in-person training). Stage 4: Training (5
weeks)
The fourth stage will involve the training process
whereby there will be a performance of the in-person training
sessions towards quality healthcare improvement. Training
webinars will be checked in this stage. There will also be a
collection of the baseline information; making completion of
the implementation preparedness checklist. This stage will take
around five weeks.Stage 5: an ongoing process of assessing the
situation
The next stage will be a continuous bi-weekly
gathering to make a continuous assessment of the situation.
There will be an updating of the action plans as well as the
implementation of the checklist. The last stage will be involving
a contours process whereby activities such as continuous weekly
meeting will be important to help in determining the challenges
being faced as well as the areas which are successful. In this
stage, there will be the determination of the successful intervals
for the healthcare providers. Frequent collection and analysis of
the data regarding the practices towards preventing healthcare-
acquired infections will be analyzed.
There will be a review of relevant supplementary
learning network webinars. There will also be a pilot like
interventions through the selection of specific departments or
wards which are usually having a continuous flow of patients to
help in giving a clear picture regarding the effectiveness of the
program. There will be continuous training of the current and
new as well as the assessment of the healthcare providers with
regard to how they are being affected by socio-demographic
factors i.e. age, marital status, religion, ethnicity, level of
education, and the work experiences and health facility factors.
There will be assigned of the responsibilities to the
staffs to help in improving the implementation process aimed at
reducing healthcare-acquired infections. Each healthcare
provider will be assigned the responsibility with a focus on the
identification of the factors which might be further increasing
the rate of healthcare-acquired infections other than those which
have been identified to be the major contributors.
There will be continuous communication and giving
reports in relation to the prevention processes. The prevention
practices of healthcare-acquired infection are only developed
through having a continuous operational procedure which is
involving reporting the emerging issues and areas that requires
improvement; therefore, through the existence of continuous
communication process, it will be possible to deal with the issue
of healthcare-acquired infections as a team. Regular assessment
of the progress and creating a plan to keep the process of
implementation of the targeted practices to other departments
within the facility will be of great value.
Communication with the key stakeholders of the
healthcare facility is another important step and this has to be
an ongoing process. Stakeholders, in this case, are the
individuals who are directly involved or are affected by the
increasing incidences of the healthcare-acquired infections. The
stakeholders include patients, healthcare providers; groups
providing financial support to the hospital, and the hospital
management among others. There will be continuous
communication and consultation with the stakeholders to help in
rolling out the program as well as expanding the process of
building the sustainability of the program. Stakeholders will be
important in providing feedback regarding the program aimed at
addressing the existing gaps in addressing issues related to the
prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. The stakeholders
will be helping in identifying the areas which require some form
of refinement as well as giving suggestions on the new
approaches of initiatives which should be applied or adopted.
Continuous cooperation, as well as collaboration with
patients, will be important in ensuring that there is a success in
improving the process of addressing issues related to the
prevention of healthcare-acquired infection. Patients are the
highly exposed individuals to healthcare-acquired infection,
therefore, an effective process of educating them on how to
report and stick by the instruction of the healthcare providers
especially those who are placed on an isolated room will be
important in helping to reduce the exposure to healthcare-
acquired infections such as tuberculosis. With regard to working
together with the management of the healthcare facility, the
success of the program will be achieved through support from
the management. The top management is key stakeholders who
are the individuals who are giving go ahead with the process of
making an improvement to the issue of concern. Top
management will be providing the financial support needed to
purchase the materials required towards making the mission of
healthcare-acquired infection prevention activities possible. It
cannot be possible to make an improvement to the concerns
related to the infection if the management is not fully engaged
since the project is doom to fail due to a lack of full support.
Materials, activities and the cost
In order to meet the objective of full implementation of
the program, it is important to have the required resources in
place. These resources are the materials or the equipment which
are supposed to be purchased to help in ensuring that every
activity being undertaken such as the training of the staffs as
well as engaging the key stakeholders i.e. healthcare providers,
management, financial supporters, and the patients are
effectively involved in the process of implementation.
Therefore the materials and the activity of training and
communicating with the stakeholders are categorized below
based on the amount required to support each activity or
purchase of the materials needed.
Materials/ Activities
Costs
Gloves
$ 300
Manila paper for designing the waste segregation protocol
$ 15
More laboratory coats
$ 100
Hydrogen Peroxide
$ 500
Alcohol Disinfectant
$ 300
Sterilizer Machine
$ 800
Alcohol Hand Disinfectant
$ 100
Pens and Notebooks
$ 150
Construction of the isolation room
$ 5000
Training of healthcare providers
$ 3000
Communication with the stakeholders
$ 800
Miscellaneous
$ 2000
Total
$ 13,065
Results Socio-demographics features of the research population
Infection prevention is amongst the challenges
faced in many healthcare institutions in the entire world. This
study assessed the knowledge, practice, and associated factors
aimed at reducing or preventing healthcare-acquired infections
among healthcare workers. In this particular study, a total of
250 healthcare professionals were interviewed and yields a
response rate of 95 percent majorities. There were many
individuals i.e. 150 (60 percent) were in the age bracket of 26 to
3o years old. The majority of the respondents were from
Orthodox Christianity at 72 percent of the population. A higher
percentage of the individuals who participated in this study was
diploma holders at 40 percent (100 participants).
Overall, based on this particular study, it is clear that
the majority of healthcare providers were knowledgeable about
the prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. Many of these
healthcare providers were having sufficient knowledge required
to make a contribution towards helping in reducing healthcare-
acquired infections. This study, therefore, shows that the
outcomes are in line with many other research works which
have shown that healthcare providers are knowledgeable enough
to help in the prevention of infection; nevertheless, the issue of
controlling or preventing such infection is affected by the
attitudes or the socio-demographic factors or lack of adequate
resources to accomplish this mission.
.
Variable
Frequency
Percentage
Age
20 to 25
80
32%
26 to 30
150
60%
Over 31 years
20
8%
Sex
Male
150
60%
Female
100
40%
Marital Status
Single
140
56 %
Married
110
44%
Religion
Muslim
30
12%
Orthodox
180
72%
Protestant
40
16%
Educational Status
Master and Above
80
32 %
Bachelors
70
28 %
Diploma
100
40 %
Work Experience
Over five years
170
68%
5 to 10 years
70
28%
Over 10 years
10
4%
Profession
Physician
30
12%
Nurse
82
32.8%
Midwifery
60
24%
Health officials
18
7.2%
Laboratory Technician
40
16%
Other healthcare providers
20
8%
Involved in the training
Yes
90
36%
No
160
64%
There is availability of IP guideline
Yes
100
40%
No
150
60%
Knowledge concerning the infection prevention
In this particular study, a total of 220 (88 percent)
and 210 (84 percent) believed that healthcare-acquired
infections are prevented using disinfection and antiseptic
respectively. A total of 190 respondents (76 percent) believed
that equipment requires the process of decontamination prior to
the sterilization procedure. More than half of the participants
(56 percent) are not well informed regarding the [preparation of
0.5 percent of chlorine solution.
Variables
The level of knowledge
Frequency
Disinfection is helpful in the prevention of the acquired
infections
Ye
220
88 %
No
30
12%
Antiseptic is helping in the prevention of healthcare-acquired
infection
Yes
210
84%
No
40
16%
The is sterilization of the equipment using chemical
Yes
100
40%
No
150
60 %
There is physical sterilization of equipment through the use of
heat and radiation occasionally
Yes
70
28 %
No
180
72%
All pathogens are destroyed through autoclaving
Yes
170
68%
No
80
32%
There is a decontamination of equipment before the sterilization
process
Yes
190
76%
No
60
24%
Protective devices are important when it comes to the reduction
of the infections
Yes
185
74%
No
65
26%
Wearing of gloves is used as a replacement of hand washing
Yes
90
64%
No
160
36%
There is a preparation of o.5 percent chlorine solution
Yes
110
44%
No
140
56%
There is the use of PEP for HIV after being exposed to blood
Yes
230
92%
No
20
8%
The practice of healthcare providers in an effort to prevent
healthcare-acquired infections
In this particular study, the percentages of the
healthcare providers believed it was important to wash hand
before starting to provide healthcare and after completion of
healthcare provision were 140 (56 percent) and 200 (80 percent)
respectively. There was almost equal proportional with regard
to the number of respondents who said there is use of soap to
wash the hands before patient care i.e. 120 (48 percent) and the
individuals who believed that there was no washing of the hands
after provision of healthcare services i.e. 130 (52 percent) based
on the responses given by the study participants, majority of the
respondents believe that there is no use of any type of
protective equipment such as mask, gloves, and gowns among
others. Only 42 participants (16.8) believed that there is the use
of personal protective equipment.
The length of working experience is associated with
the knowledge score based on the outcome of this study.
According to the result of the study, healthcare providers who
have been in the medical field for not less than ten years are
more likely to be knowledgeable about the issues related to the
prevention programs. The increase in the knowledge in relation
to the number of experience is likely to be related to the
increase in the number of years of practice which increases
exposure to different healthcare settings. Such healthcare
providers are exposed repeatedly and are becoming more
experienced through interacting and taking part in working with
senior healthcare providers.
Variable
Response
Figures
Frequency
There is washing of the hands using soap before prior to the
start of healthcare
Yes
140
56%
No
110
44%
There is a habit of washing hand using soap after providing care
to the patient
Yes
200
80 %
No
50
20%
There is washing of the hands without soap prior to or after
patient care
Yes
120
48%
No
130
52 %
There is the use of all categories of personal protective
equipment
Ye
42
16.8
No
208
83.2
Aspects related to the knowledge of the healthcare professionals
regarding the issue of preventing healthcare-acquired infections
Some of the major factors which were associated with
the knowledge in relation to the healthcare-acquired prevention
included age, education attainment, the work experience of the
healthcare providers, sex of the respondents, profession, and
training received in relation to the techniques used in the
prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. Healthcare
providers who are over 31 years were three times more
knowledgeable as compared to individuals or healthcare
providers whose age bracket was 21 to 25 years. Male
healthcare employees were twice likely to be more
knowledgeable as compared to their female counterparts.
This study also reveals that the working experience
strongly influenced the practices towards prevention of
healthcare-acquired infections. Individuals with experience of
more than ten years of work within healthcare sector were four
times likely to possess the knowledge required to help in the
control or prevention of healthcare-acquired infections as
compared to individuals or healthcare provider who had work
experience of fewer than five years in the field of healthcare.
This study also indicates that the level of education
greatly impacted on the knowledge acquired to help in the
prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. In this case,
healthcare providers whose education level was in the Master
level or above Masters level were more knowledgeable as
compared to other levels of education i.e. Bachelors and
Diploma. Healthcare providers with a master level of education
were thrice more likely to be knowledgeable about the issues
related to healthcare-acquired infections. Healthcare workers
with Bachelor level of education were twice more likely to be
more knowledgeable as compared to the healthcare providers
who had a diploma level of education.
The infection training program is also playing an
important role in increasing the level of experience and
knowledge required to help in the reduction of healthcare-
acquired infections. Healthcare providers who have not yet
received training on the techniques required towards prevention
and control of healthcare-acquired infections are less
knowledgeable about the infection prevention as compared to
those who had undergone through the training program related
to the prevention of healthcare-acquired infection. The result
from this study indicating that healthcare providers with higher
education appear to be having more knowledge score as
compared to the low educational level is an indication that these
healthcare providers have acquired more educational
information related to the prevention of healthcare-acquired
infections. Limitation of the study
Healthcare-acquired infections are considered to be a
very broad topic, therefore, it has not been possible to cover all
aspects of the healthcare-acquired infections in this one
research paper. This, therefore, implies that I have been
selective in choosing the major factors in the present argument
with regard to the healthcare-acquired infections which is
causing major concern in the public healthcare sector. Another
limitation of this study is that it was restricted to a specific
healthcare facility.
This, therefore, implies that it does not reveal the real
situation in the entire world, however, it shows that the clear
picture of what is happening in a major healthcare facility in
relation to the lack of knowledge, poor practices, and other
factors such as socio-demographic aspects. These factors are
considered to be playing a major important role in with regard
to the issue of healthcare-acquired infections. Another
limitation in this study is that it was specifically restricted to
the healthcare providers as the key individuals who are playing
a role in the increase in the reduction or increase in the
healthcare-acquired infections. Even though patients are
contributing to the spread of healthcare-acquired infections this
study was mainly focused on the healthcare providers as the
major key players that can be targeted with policies aimed at
controlling healthcare-acquired infection in many healthcare
facilities.
References
Batran, A., Ayed, A., Salameh, B., Ayoub, M., & Fasfous, A.
(2018). Are standard precautions for hospital-acquired infection
among nurses in the public sector satisfactory? AMHS , 6 (2),
223-227.
Desta, M., Ayenew, T., Sitotaw, N., Tegegne, N., Dires, M., &
Getie, M. (2018). Knowledge, practice and associated factors of
infection prevention among healthcare workers in Debre Markos
referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res, 18,
465.
Haque, M., Sartelli, M., McKimm, J., & Bakar, A. M. (2018).
Healthcare-associated infections – an overview. Infection Drug
Resist, 11, 2321-2333.
Imad, F., Ayed, A., Faeda, E., & Lubna, H. (2015). Knowledge
and Practice of Nursing Staff towards Infection Control
Measures in the Palestinian Hospitals. ERIC, 6 (4), 79-90.
Jahangir, M., Ali, M., & Riaz, M. S. (2017). Knowledge and
Practices of Nurses Regarding Spread of Nosocomial Infection
In government Hospitals, Lahore. J Liaquat Uni Med Health Sci,
16 (3), 149-153.
Moyo, G. (2013). Factors influencing compliance with infection
prevention standard precautions among nurses working at
Mbagathi district hospital, Nairobi, Kenya. Doctoral
dissertation, University of Nairobi.
Stone, P. (2017). Economic burden of healthcare-associated
infections: an American perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon
Outcomes Res, 9 (5), 417-422.
Teshager, A. F., Engeda, H. E., & Worku, W. Z. (2015).
Knowledge, Practice, and Associated Factors towards
Prevention of Surgical Site Infection among Nurses Working in
Amhara Regional State Referral Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia.
Surgery Research and Practice.
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment
TitleTotal PointsNRS-434VNNRS-434VN-O505Developmental
Assessment and the School-Aged
Child100.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than
Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good
(89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints
EarnedContent80.0%Comparison of Physical Assessment
Among School-Aged Children25.0%A comparison of physical
assessments among different school-aged children is omitted.An
incomplete comparison of physical assessments among different
school-aged children is summarized. How assessment
techniques would be modified depending on the age and
developmental stage of the child is omitted or contains
significant inaccuracies.A general comparison of physical
assessments among different school-aged children is
summarized. How assessment techniques would be modified
depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is
generally described. More information or support is needed for
clarity or accuracy.A comparison of physical assessments
among different school-aged children is presented. How
assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age
and developmental stage of the child is described. Some
information is needed for clarity.A detailed comparison of
physical assessments among different school-aged children is
presented. How assessment techniques would be modified
depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is
thoroughly described. Insight is demonstrated into the physical
assessment of school age children.Typical Assessment for a
Child of a Specific Age25.0%The typical developmental stage
of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is not described. The
typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and
12 is summarized. The summary contains significant
inaccuracies for the age of the child. The typical developmental
stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is generally
described. The description contains some inaccuracies for the
age of the child.The typical developmental stage of a child
between the ages 5 and 12 is described. The overall description
is accurate. Some information is needed for clarity.The typical
developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is
accurately and thoroughly described. Developmental
Assessment of a Child Using a Developmental Theory
(Erickson, Piaget, Kohlberg)30.0%A child assessment based on
a developmental theory is omitted.A child assessment based on
a developmental theory is partially summarized. Partial
strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would
be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential
findings expected from the assessment are omitted or are
incorrect. There are significant inaccuracies.A child assessment
based on a developmental theory is generally described. General
strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would
be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential
findings expected from the assessment are summarized. There
are minor inaccuracies.A child assessment based on a
developmental theory is described. Appropriate strategies to
gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered
during the assessment are presented. The potential findings
expected from the assessment are described. Some information
is needed for clarity.A child assessment based on a
developmental theory is thoroughly described. Well-developed
strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would
be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential
findings expected from the assessment are all accurate and
described in detail.Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%Thesis
Development and Purpose5.0%Paper lacks any discernible
overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently
developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and
appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the
development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is
comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis
statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic
and Construction5.0%Statement of purpose is not justified by
the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim
made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible
sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument
lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.
Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is
orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument
presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically,
but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are
credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a
persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All
sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes
spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0%Surface
errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of
meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is
used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the
reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate
language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors,
although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures
and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in
command of standard, written, academic English.Format
5.0%Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment)2.0%Template is not used appropriately or
documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Template is
used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of
control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and
formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be
present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.All format elements are correct. Documentation
of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
as appropriate to assignment and style)3.0%Sources are not
documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or
incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to
assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be
present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely
and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is free of error.Total Weightage100%
1
The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing
March 21, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction 3
Master’s Education in Nursing and Areas of Practice 5
Context for Nursing Practice 6
Master’s Nursing Education Curriculum 7
The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing
I. Background for Practice from Sciences and Humanities 9
II. Organizational and Systems Leadership 11
III. Quality Improvement and Safety 13
IV. Translating and Integrating Scholarship into Practice 15
V. Informatics and Healthcare Technologies 17
VI. Health Policy and Advocacy 20
VII. Interprofessional Collaboration for Improving Patient
and Population Health Outcomes 22
VIII. Clinical Prevention and Population Health for
Improving Health 24
IX. Master’s-Level Nursing Practice 26
Clinical/Practice Learning Expectations for Master’s Programs
29
Summary 31
Glossary 31
2
References 40
Appendix A: Task Force on the Essentials of Master’s
Education in Nursing 49
Appendix B: Participants who attended Stakeholder Meetings 50
Appendix C: Schools of Nursing that Participated in the
Regional Meetings
or Provided Feedback 52
Appendix D: Professional Organizations that Participated in the
Regional
Meetings or Provided Feedback 63
Appendix E: Healthcare Systems that Participated in the
Regional Meetings 64
3
The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing
March 21, 2011
The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing reflect the
profession’s continuing call for
imagination, transformative thinking, and evolutionary change
in graduate education. The
extraordinary explosion of knowledge, expanding technologies,
increasing diversity, and global
health challenges produce a dynamic environment for nursing
and amplify nursing’s critical
contributions to health care. Master’s education prepares nurses
for flexible leadership and
critical action within complex, changing systems, including
health, educational, and
organizational systems. Master’s education equips nurses with
valuable knowledge and skills to
lead change, promote health, and elevate care in various roles
and settings. Synergy with these
Essentials, current and future healthcare reform legislation, and
the action-oriented
recommendations of the Initiative on the Future of Nursing
(IOM, 2010) highlights the value and
transforming potential of the nursing profession.
These Essentials are core for all master’s programs in nursing
and provide the necessary
curricular elements and framework, regardless of focus, major,
or intended practice setting. These
Essentials delineate the outcomes expected of all graduates of
master’s nursing programs. These
Essentials are not prescriptive directives on the design of
programs. Consistent with the
Baccalaureate and Doctorate of Nursing Practice Essentials, this
document does not address
preparation for specific roles, which may change and emerge
over time. These Essentials also
provide guidance for master’s programs during a time when
preparation for specialty advanced
nursing practice is transitioning to the doctoral level.
Master’s education remains a critical component of the nursing
education trajectory to prepare
nurses who can address the gaps resulting from growing
healthcare needs. Nurses who obtain the
competencies outlined in these Essentials have significant value
for current and emerging roles in
healthcare delivery and design through advanced nursing
knowledge and higher level leadership
skills for improving health outcomes. For some nurses, master’s
education equips them with a
fulfilling lifetime expression of their mastery area. For others,
this core is a graduate foundation
for doctoral education. Each preparation is valued.
Introduction
The dynamic nature of the healthcare delivery system
underscores the need for the
nursing profession to look to the future and anticipate the
healthcare needs for which
nurses must be prepared to address. The complexities of health
and nursing care today
make expanded nursing knowledge a necessity in contemporary
care settings. The
transformation of health care and nursing practice requires a
new conceptualization of
master’s education. Master’s education must prepare the
graduate to:
• Lead change to improve quality outcomes,
4
• Advance a culture of excellence through lifelong learning,
• Build and lead collaborative interprofessional care teams,
• Navigate and integrate care services across the healthcare
system,
• Design innovative nursing practices, and
• Translate evidence into practice.
Graduates of master’s degree programs in nursing are prepared
with broad knowledge
and practice expertise that builds and expands on baccalaureate
or entry-level nursing
practice. This preparation provides graduates with a fuller
understanding of the discipline
of nursing in order to engage in higher level practice and
leadership in a variety of
settings and commit to lifelong learning. For those nurses
seeking a terminal degree, the
highest level of preparation within the discipline, the new
conceptualization for master’s
education will allow for seamless movement into a research or
practice-focused doctoral
program (AACN, 2006, 2010).
The nine Essentials addressed in this document delineate the
knowledge and skills that all
nurses prepared in master’s nursing programs acquire. These
Essentials guide the
preparation of graduates for diverse areas of practice in any
healthcare setting.
• Essential I: Background for Practice from Sciences and
Humanities
o Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse integrates
scientific findings
from nursing, biopsychosocial fields, genetics, public health,
quality
improvement, and organizational sciences for the continual
improvement
of nursing care across diverse settings.
• Essential II: Organizational and Systems Leadership
o Recognizes that organizational and systems leadership are
critical to the
promotion of high quality and safe patient care. Leadership
skills are
needed that emphasize ethical and critical decision making,
effective
working relationships, and a systems-perspective.
• Essential III: Quality Improvement and Safety
o Recognizes that a master’s-prepared nurse must be articulate
in the
methods, tools, performance measures, and standards related to
quality, as
well as prepared to apply quality principles within an
organization.
• Essential IV: Translating and Integrating Scholarship into
Practice
o Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse applies research
outcomes
within the practice setting, resolves practice problems, works as
a change
agent, and disseminates results.
• Essential V: Informatics and Healthcare Technologies
5
o Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse uses patient-care
technologies
to deliver and enhance care and uses communication
technologies to
integrate and coordinate care.
• Essential VI: Health Policy and Advocacy
o Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse is able to
intervene at the
system level through the policy development process and to
employ
advocacy strategies to influence health and health care.
• Essential VII: Interprofessional Collaboration for Improving
Patient and
Population Health Outcomes
o Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse, as a member and
leader of
interprofessional teams, communicates, collaborates, and
consults with
other health professionals to manage and coordinate care.
• Essential VIII: Clinical Prevention and Population Health for
Improving
Health
o Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse applies and
integrates broad,
organizational, client-centered, and culturally appropriate
concepts in the
planning, delivery, management, and evaluation of evidence-
based clinical
prevention and population care and services to individuals,
families, and
aggregates/identified populations.
• Essential IX: Master’s-Level Nursing Practice
o Recognizes that nursing practice, at the master’s level, is
broadly defined
as any form of nursing intervention that influences healthcare
outcomes
for individuals, populations, or systems. Master’s-level nursing
graduates
must have an advanced level of understanding of nursing and
relevant
sciences as well as the ability to integrate this knowledge into
practice. .
Nursing practice interventions include both direct and indirect
care
components.
Master’s Education in Nursing and Areas of Practice
Graduates with a master’s degree in nursing are prepared for a
variety of roles and areas
of practice. Graduates may pursue new and innovative roles that
result from health
reform and changes in an evolving and global healthcare
system. Some graduates will
pursue direct care practice roles in a variety of settings (e.g.,
the Clinical Nurse Leader,
nurse educator). Others may choose indirect care roles or areas
of practice that focus on
aggregate, systems, or have an organizational focus, (e.g.
nursing or health program
management, informatics, public health, or clinical research
coordinator). In addition to
developing competence in the nine Essential core areas
delineated in this document, each
graduate will have additional coursework in an area of practice
or functional role. This
coursework may include more in-depth preparation and
competence in one or two of the
Essentials or in an additional/ supplementary area of practice.
For example, more concentrated coursework or further
development of the knowledge
and skills embedded in Essential IV (Translational Scholarship
for Evidence-Based
Practice) will prepare the nurse to manage research projects for
nurse scientists and other
6
healthcare researchers working in multi-professional research
teams. More in-depth
preparation in Essential II (Organizational and System
Leadership) will provide
knowledge useful for nursing management roles.
In some instances, graduates of master’s in nursing programs
will seek to fill roles as
educators. As outlined in Essential IX, all master’s-prepared
nurses will develop
competence in applying teaching/learning principles in work
with patients and/or students
across the continuum of care in a variety of settings. However,
as recommended in the
Carnegie Foundation report (2009), Educating Nurses: A Call
for Radical
Transformation, those individuals, as do all master’s graduates,
who choose a nurse
educator role require preparation across all nine Essential areas,
including graduate-level
clinical practice content and experiences. In addition, a program
preparing individuals for
a nurse educator role should include preparation in curriculum
design and development,
teaching methodologies, educational needs assessment, and
learner-centered theories and
methods. Master’s prepared nurses may teach patients and their
families and/or student
nurses, staff nurses, and variety of direct-care providers. The
master’s prepared nurse
educator differs from the BSN nurse in depth of his/her
understanding of the nursing
discipline, nursing practice, and the added pedagogical skills.
To teach students, patients,
and caregivers regarding health promotion, disease prevention,
or disease management,
the master’s-prepared nurse educator builds on baccalaureate
knowledge with graduate-
level content in the areas of health assessment,
physiology/pathophysiology, and
pharmacology to strengthen his/her scientific background and
facilitate his/her
understanding of nursing and health-related information. Those
master’s students who
aspire to faculty roles in baccalaureate and higher degree
programs will be advised that
additional education at the doctoral level is needed (AACN,
2008).
Context for Nursing Practice
Health care in the United States and globally is changing
dramatically. Interest in
evolving health care has prompted greater focus on health
promotion and illness
prevention, along with cost-effective approaches to high acuity,
chronic disease
management, care coordination, and long-term care. Public
concerns about cost of health
care, fiscal sustainability, healthcare quality, and development
of sustainable solutions to
healthcare problems are driving reform efforts. Attention to
affordability and accessibility
of health care, maintaining healthy environments, and
promoting personal and
community responsibility for health is growing among the
public and policy makers.
In addition to broad public mandates for a reformed and
responsive healthcare system, a
number of groups are calling for changes in the ways all health
professionals are educated
to meet current and projected needs for contemporary care
delivery. The Institute of
7
Medicine (IOM), an interprofessional healthcare panel,
described a set of core
competencies that all health professionals regardless of
discipline will demonstrate: 1) the
provision of patient-centered care, 2) working in
interprofessional teams, 3) employing
evidence-based practice, 4) applying quality improvement
approaches, and 5) utilizing
informatics (IOM, 2003).
Given the ongoing public trust in nursing (Gallup, 2010), and
the desire for fundamental
reorganization of relationships among individuals, the public,
healthcare organizations
and healthcare professionals, graduate education for nurses is
needed that is wide in
scope and breadth, emphasizes all systems-level care and
includes mastery of practice
knowledge and skills. Such preparation reflects mastery of
higher level thinking and
conceptualization skills than at the baccalaureate level, as well
as an understanding of the
interrelationships among practice, ethical, and legal issues;
financial concerns and
comparative effectiveness; and interprofessional teamwork.
Master’s Nursing Education Curriculum
The master’s nursing curriculum is conceptualized in Figure 1
and includes three
components:
1. Graduate Nursing Core: foundational curriculum content
deemed essential
for all students who pursue a master’s degree in nursing
regardless of the
functional focus.
2. Direct Care Core: essential content to provide direct patient
services at an
advanced level.
3. Functional Area Content: those clinical and didactic learning
experiences
identified and defined by the professional nursing organizations
and
certification bodies for specific nursing roles or functions.
This document delineates the graduate nursing core
competencies for all master’s
graduates. These core outcomes reflect the many changes in the
healthcare system
occurring over the past decade. In addition, these expected
outcomes for all master’s
degree graduates reflect the increasing responsibility of nursing
in addressing many of the
gaps in health care as well as growing patient and population
needs.
Master’s nursing education, as is all nursing education, is
evolving to meet these needs
and to prepare nurses to assume increasing accountabilities,
responsibilities, and
leadership positions. As master’s nursing education is re-
envisioned and preparation of
individuals for advanced specialty nursing practice transitions
to the practice doctorate
these Essentials delineate the foundational, core expectations
for these master’s program
graduates until the transition is completed.
8
Figure 1: Model of Master’s Nursing Curriculum
* All master’s degree programs that prepare graduates for roles
that have a component of
direct care practice are required to have graduate level
content/coursework in the
following three areas: physiology/pathophysiology, health
assessment, and
pharmacology. However, graduates being prepared for any one
of the four APRN roles
(CRNA, CNM, CNS, or CNP), must complete three separate
comprehensive, graduate
level courses that meet the criteria delineated in the 2008
Consensus Model for APRN
Licensure, Accreditation, Certification and Education.
(http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education/pdf/APRNReport.pdf). In
addition, the expected
outcomes for each of these three APRN core courses are
delineated in The Essentials of
Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice (pg. 23-24)
(http://www.aacn.nche.edu/DNP/pdf/Essentials.pdf).
+ The nursing educator is a direct care role and therefore
requires graduate-level content
in the three Direct Care Core courses. All graduates of a
master’s nursing program must
have supervised practice experiences that are sufficient to
demonstrate mastery of the
Essentials. The term “supervised” is used broadly and can
include precepted experiences
with faculty site visits. These learning experiences may be
accomplished through diverse
teaching methods, including face-to-face or simulated methods.
In addition, development of clinical proficiency is facilitated
through the use of focused
and sustained clinical experiences designed to strengthen
patient care delivery skills, as
9
well as system assessment and intervention skills, which will
lead to an enhanced
understanding of organizational dynamics. These immersion
experiences afford the
student an opportunity to focus on a population of interest or
may focus on a specific
role. Most often, the immersion experience occurs toward the
end of the program as a
culminating synthesis experience.
The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing
Essential I: Background for Practice from Sciences and
Humanities
Rationale
Master’s-prepared nurses build on the competencies gained in a
baccalaureate nursing
program by developing a deeper understanding of nursing and
the related sciences needed
to fully analyze, design, implement, and evaluate nursing care.
These nurses are well
prepared to provide care to diverse populations and cohorts of
patients in clinical and
community-based systems. The master’s-prepared nurse
integrates findings from the
sciences and the humanities, biopsychosocial fields, genetics,
public health, quality
improvement, health economics, translational science, and
organizational sciences for the
continual improvement of nursing care at the unit, clinic, home,
or program level.
Master’s-prepared nursing care reflects a more sophisticated
understanding of
assessment, problem identification, design of interventions, and
evaluation of aggregate
outcomes than baccalaureate-prepared nursing care.
Students being prepared for direct care roles will have graduate-
level content that builds
upon an undergraduate foundation in health assessment,
pharmacology, and
pathophysiology. Having master’s-prepared graduates with a
strong background in these
three areas is seen as imperative from the practice perspective.
It is recommended that the
master’s curriculum preparing individuals for direct care roles
include three separate
graduate-level courses in these three content areas. In addition,
the inclusion of these
three separate courses facilitates the transition of these master’s
program graduates into
the DNP advanced-practice registered-nurse programs.
Master’s-prepared nurses understand the intersection between
systems science and
organizational science in order to serve as integrators within
and across systems of care.
Care coordination is based on systems science (Nelson et al.,
2008). Care management
incorporates an understanding of the clinical and community
context, and the research
relevant to the needs of the population. Nurses at this level use
advanced clinical
reasoning for ambiguous and uncertain clinical presentations,
and incorporate concerns of
family, significant others, and communities into the design and
delivery of care.
Master’s-prepared nurses use a variety of theories and
frameworks, including nursing and
ethical theories in the analysis of clinical problems, illness
prevention, and health
promotion strategies. Knowledge from information sciences,
health communication, and
health literacy are used to provide care to multiple populations.
These nurses are able to
10
address complex cultural issues and design care that responds to
the needs of multiple
populations, who may have potentially conflicting cultural
needs and preferences. As
healthcare technology becomes more sophisticated and its use
more widespread,
master’s-prepared nurse are able to evaluate when its use is
appropriate for diagnostic,
educational, and therapeutic interventions. Master’s-prepared
nurses use improvement
science and quality processes to evaluate outcomes of the
aggregate of patients,
community members, or communities under their care, monitor
trends in clinical data,
and understand the implications of trends for changing nursing
care.
The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to:
1. Integrate nursing and related sciences into the delivery of
advanced nursing care to
diverse populations.
2. Incorporate current and emerging genetic/genomic evidence
in providing advanced
nursing care to individuals, families, and communities while
accounting for patient
values and clinical judgment.
3. Design nursing care for a clinical or community-focused
population based on
biopsychosocial, public health, nursing, and organizational
sciences.
4. Apply ethical analysis and clinical reasoning to assess,
intervene, and evaluate
advanced nursing care delivery.
5. Synthesize evidence for practice to determine appropriate
application of interventions
across diverse populations.
6. Use quality processes and improvement science to evaluate
care and ensure patient
safety for individuals and communities.
7. Integrate organizational science and informatics to make
changes in the care
environment to improve health outcomes.
8. Analyze nursing history to expand thinking and provide a
sense of professional
heritage and identity.
Sample Content
• Healthcare economics and finance models
• Advanced nursing science, including the major streams of
nursing scientific
development
• Scientific bases of illness prevention, health promotion, and
wellness
• Genetics, genomics, and pharmacogenomics
• Public health science, such as basic epidemiology,
surveillance, environmental
science, and population health analysis and program planning
• Organizational sciences
11
• Systems science and integration, including microsystems,
mesosystems, and macro-
level systems
• Chaos theory and complexity science
• Leadership science
• Theories of bioethics
• Information science
• Quality processes and improvement science
• Technology assessment
• Nursing Theories
Essential II: Organizational and Systems Leadership
Rationale
Organizational and systems leadership are critical to the
promotion of high quality and
safe patient care. Leadership skills are needed that emphasize
ethical and critical decision
making. The master’s-prepared nurse’s knowledge and skills in
these areas are consistent
with nursing and healthcare goals to eliminate health disparities
and to promote
excellence in practice. Master’s-level practice includes not only
direct care but also a
focus on the systems that provide care and serve the needs of a
panel of patients, a
defined population, or community.
To be effective, graduates must be able to demonstrate
leadership by initiating and
maintaining effective working relationships using mutually
respectful communication
and collaboration within interprofessional teams, demonstrating
skills in care
coordination, delegation, and initiating conflict resolution
strategies. The master’s-
prepared nurse provides and coordinates comprehensive care for
patients–individuals,
families, groups, and communities–in multiple and varied
settings. Using information
from numerous sources, these nurses navigate the patient
through the healthcare system
and assume accountability for quality outcomes. Skills essential
to leadership include
communication, collaboration, negotiation, delegation, and
coordination.
Master’s-prepared nurses are members and leaders of healthcare
teams that deliver a
variety of services. These graduates bring a unique blend of
knowledge, judgment, skills,
and caring to the team. As a leader and partner with other health
professionals, these
nurses seek collaboration and consultation with other providers
as necessary in the
design, coordination, and evaluation of patient care outcomes.
In an environment with ongoing changes in the organization and
financing of health care,
it is imperative that all master’s-prepared nurses have a keen
understanding of healthcare
policy, organization, and financing. The purpose of this content
is to prepare a graduate
to provide quality cost-effective care; to participate in the
implementation of care; and to
12
assume a leadership role in the management of human, fiscal,
and physical healthcare
resources. Program graduates understand the economies of care,
business principles, and
how to work within and affect change in systems.
The master’s-prepared nurse must be able to analyze the impact
of systems on patient
outcomes, including analyzing error rates. These nurses will be
prepared with knowledge
and expertise in assessing organizations, identifying systems’
issues, and facilitating
organization-wide changes in practice delivery. Master’s-
prepared nurses must be able to
use effective interdisciplinary communication skills to work
across departments
identifying opportunities and designing and testing systems and
programs to improve
care. In addition, nurse practice at this level requires an
understanding of complexity
theory and systems thinking, as well as the business and
financial acumen needed for the
analysis of practice quality and costs.
The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to:
1. Apply leadership skills and decision making in the provision
of culturally responsive,
high-quality nursing care, healthcare team coordination, and the
oversight and
accountability for care delivery and outcomes.
2. Assume a leadership role in effectively implementing patient
safety and quality
improvement initiatives within the context of the
interprofessional team using effective
communication (scholarly writing, speaking, and group
interaction) skills.
3. Develop an understanding of how healthcare delivery systems
are organized and
financed (and how this affects patient care) and identify the
economic, legal, and political
factors that influence health care.
4. Demonstrate the ability to use complexity science and
systems theory in the design,
delivery, and evaluation of health care.
5. Apply business and economic principles and practices,
including budgeting,
cost/benefit analysis, and marketing, to develop a business plan.
6. Design and implement systems change strategies that improve
the care environment.
7. Participate in the design and implementation of new models
of care delivery and
coordination.
13
Sample Content
• Leadership, including theory, leadership styles, contemporary
approaches, and
strategies (organizing, managing, delegating, supervising,
collaborating, coordinating)
• Data-driven decision-making based on an ethical framework to
promote culturally
responsive, quality patient care in a variety of settings,
including creative and imaginative
strategies in problem solving
• Communication–both interpersonal and organizational–
including elements and
channels, models, and barriers
• Conflict, including conflict resolution, mediation, negotiation,
and managing conflict
• Change theory and social change theories
• Systems theory and complexity science
• Healthcare systems and organizational relationships (e.g.,
finance, organizational
structure, and delivery of care, including
mission/vision/philosophy and values)
• Healthcare finance, including budgeting, cost/benefit analysis,
variance analysis, and
marketing
• Operations research (e.g., queuing theory, supply chain
management, and systems
designs in health care)
• Teams and teamwork, including team leadership, building
effective teams, and
nurturing teams
Essential III: Quality Improvement and Safety
Rationale
Continuous quality improvement involves every level of the
healthcare organization. A
master’s-prepared nurse must be articulate in the methods,
tools, performance measures,
culture of safety principles, and standards related to quality, as
well as prepared to apply
quality principles within an organization to be an effective
leader and change agent.
The Institute of Medicine report (1998) To Err is Human
defined patient safety as
“freedom from accidental injury” and stated that patients should
not be at greater risk for
accidental injury in a hospital or healthcare setting than they are
in their own home.
Improvement in patient safety along with reducing and
ultimately eliminating harm to
patients is fundamental to quality care. Skills are needed that
assist in identifying actual
or potential failures in processes and systems that lead to
breakdowns and errors and then
redesigning processes to make patients safe.
Knowledge and skills in human factors and basic safety design
principles that affect
unsafe practices are essential. Graduates of master’s-level
programs must be able to
analyze systems and work to create a just culture of safety in
which personnel feel
comfortable disclosing errors—including their own—while
maintaining professional
14
accountability. Learning how to evaluate, calculate, and
improve the overall reliability of
processes are core skills needed by master’s-prepared nurses.
Knowledge of both the potential and the actual impact of
national patient safety
resources, initiatives, and regulations and the use of national
benchmarks are required.
Changes in healthcare reimbursement with the introduction of
Medicare’s list of “never
events” and the regulatory push for more transparency on
quality outcomes require
graduates to be able to determine if the outcomes of standards
of practice, performance,
and competence have been met and maintained.
The master’s-prepared nurse provides leadership across the care
continuum in diverse
settings using knowledge regarding high reliability
organizations. These organizations
achieve consistently safe and effective performance records
despite unpredictable
operating environments or intrinsically hazardous endeavors
(Weick, 2001). The
master’s-prepared nurse will be able to monitor, analyze, and
prioritize outcomes that
need to be improved. Using quality improvement and high
reliability organizational
principles, these nurses will be able to quantify the impact of
plans of action.
The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to:
1. Analyze information about quality initiatives recognizing the
contributions of
individuals and inter-professional healthcare teams to improve
health outcomes across the
continuum of care.
2. Implement evidence-based plans based on trend analysis and
quantify the impact on
quality and safety.
3. Analyze information and design systems to sustain
improvements and promote
transparency using high reliability and just culture principles.
4. Compare and contrast several appropriate quality
improvement models.
5. Promote a professional environment that includes
accountability and high-level
communication skills when involved in peer review, advocacy
for patients and families,
reporting of errors, and professional writing.
6. Contribute to the integration of healthcare services within
systems to affect safety and
quality of care to improve patient outcomes and reduce
fragmentation of care.
7. Direct quality improvement methods to promote culturally
responsive, safe, timely,
effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care.
8. Lead quality improvement initiatives that integrate socio-
cultural factors affecting the
delivery of nursing and healthcare services.
15
Sample Content
• Quality improvement models differentiating structure, process,
and outcome indicators
• Principles of a just culture and relationship to analyzing errors
• Quality improvement methods and tools: Brainstorming,
Fishbone cause and effect
diagram, flow chart, Plan, Do Study, Act (PDSA), Plan, Do,
Check, Act (PDCA),Find,
Organize, Clarify, Understand, Select-Plan, Do, Check, Act
(FOCUS-PDCA), Six Sigma,
Lean
• High-Reliability Organizations (HROs) / High-reliability
techniques
• National patient safety goals and other relevant regulatory
standards (e.g., CMS core
measures, pay for performance indicators, and never events)
• Nurse-sensitive indicators
• Data management (e.g., collection tools, display techniques,
data analysis, trend
analysis, control charts)
•Analysis of errors (e.g., Root Cause Analysis [RCA], Failure
Mode Effects Analysis
[FMEA], serious safety events)
• Communication (e.g., hands-off communication, chain-of-
command, error disclosure)
• Participate in executive patient safety rounds
• Simulation training in a variety of settings (e.g., disasters,
codes, and other high-risk
clinical areas)
• RN fit for duty/impact of fatigue and distractions in care
environment on patient safety
Essential IV: Translating and Integrating Scholarship into
Practice
Rationale
Professional nursing practice at all levels is grounded in the
ethical translation of current
evidence into practice. Fundamentally, nurses need a
questioning/inquiring attitude
toward their practice and the care environment.
The master’s-prepared nurse examines policies and seeks
evidence for every aspect of
practice, thereby translating current evidence and identifying
gaps where evidence is
lacking. These nurses apply research outcomes within the
practice setting, resolve
practice problems (individually or as a member of the
healthcare team), and disseminate
results both within the setting and in wider venues in order to
advance clinical practice.
Changing practice locally, as well as more broadly, demands
that the master’s-prepared
nurse is skilled at challenging current practices, procedures, and
policies. The emerging
sciences referred to as implementation or improvement sciences
are providing evidence
about the processes that are effective when making needed
changes where the change
processes and context are themselves evidence based
(Damschroder et al., 2009; Sobo,
Bowman, & Gifford, 2008; van Achterberg, Schoonhoven, &
Grol, 2008). Master’s-
16
prepared nurses, therefore, must be able to implement change
deemed appropriate given
context and outcome analysis, and to assist others in efforts to
improve outcomes.
Master’s-prepared nurses lead continuous improvement
processes based on translational
research skills. The cyclical processes in which these nurses are
engaged includes
identifying questions needing answers, searching or creating the
evidence for potential
solutions/innovations, evaluating the outcomes, and identifying
additional questions.
Master’s-prepared nurses, when appropriate, lead the healthcare
team in the
implementation of evidence-based practice. These nurses
support staff in lifelong
learning to improve care decisions, serving as a role model and
mentor for evidence-
based decision making. Program graduates must possess the
skills necessary to bring
evidence-based practice to both individual patients for whom
they directly care and to
those patients for whom they are indirectly responsible. Those
skills include knowledge
acquisition and dissemination, working in groups, and change
management.
The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to:
1. Integrate theory, evidence, clinical judgment, research, and
interprofessional
perspectives using translational processes to improve practice
and associated health
outcomes for patient aggregates.
2. Advocate for the ethical conduct of research and translational
scholarship (with
particular attention to the protection of the patient as a research
participant).
3. Articulate to a variety of audiences the evidence base for
practice decisions, including
the credibility of sources of information and the relevance to
the practice problem
confronted.
4. Participate, leading when appropriate, in collaborative teams
to improve care
outcomes and support policy changes through knowledge
generation, knowledge
dissemination, and planning and evaluating knowledge
implementation.
5. Apply practice guidelines to improve practice and the care
environment.
6. Perform rigorous critique of evidence derived from databases
to generate meaningful
evidence for nursing practice.
Sample Content:
• Research process
• Implementation/Improvement science
• Evidence-based practice:
17
� Clinical decision making
� Critical thinking
� Problem identification
� Outcome measurement
• Translational science:
� Data collection in nursing practice
� Design of databases that generate meaningful evidence for
nursing practice
� Data analysis in practice
� Evidence-based interventions
� Prediction and analysis of outcomes
� Patterns of behavior and outcomes
� Gaps in evidence for practice
� Importance of cultural relevance
• Scholarship:
� Application of research to the clinical setting
� Resolution of clinical problems
� Appreciative inquiry
� Dissemination of results
• Advocacy in research
• Research ethics
• Knowledge acquisition
• Group process
• Management of change
• Evidence-based policy development in practice
• Quality improvement models/methodologies
• Safety issues in practice
• Innovation processes
Essential V: Informatics and Healthcare Technologies
Rationale
Informatics and healthcare technologies encompass five broad
areas:
• Use of patient care and other technologies to deliver and
enhance care;
• Communication technologies to integrate and coordinate care;
• Data management to analyze and improve outcomes of care;
• Health information management for evidence-based care and
health education;
and
18
• Facilitation and use of electronic health records to improve
patient care.
Knowledge and skills in each of these four broad areas is
essential for all master’s-
prepared nurses. The extent and focus of each will vary
depending upon the nurse’s role,
setting, and practice focus.
Knowledge and skills in information and healthcare technology
are critical to the delivery
of quality patient care in a variety of settings (IOM, 2003a).
The use of technologies to
deliver, enhance, and document care is changing rapidly. In
addition, information
technology systems, including decision-support systems, are
essential to gathering
evidence to impact practice. Improvement in cost effectiveness
and safety depend on
evidence-based practice, outcomes research, interprofessional
care coordination, and
electronic health records, all of which involve information
management and technology
(McNeil et al., 2006). As nursing and healthcare practices
evolve to better meet patient
needs, the application of these technologies will change as well.
As the use of technology expands, the master’s-prepared nurse
must have the knowledge
and skills to use current technologies to deliver and coordinate
care across multiple
settings, analyze point of care outcomes, and communicate with
individuals and groups,
including the media, policymakers, other healthcare
professionals, and the public.
Integral to these skills is an attitude of openness to innovation
and continual learning, as
information systems and care technologies are constantly
changing, including their use at
the point of care.
Graduates of master’s-level nursing programs will have
competence to determine the
appropriate use of technologies and integrate current and
emerging technologies into
one’s practice and the practice of others to enhance care
outcomes. In addition, the
master’s-prepared nurse will be able to educate other health
professionals, staff, patients,
and caregivers using current technologies and about the
principles related to the safe and
effective use of care and information technologies.
Graduates ethically manage data, information, knowledge, and
technology to
communicate effectively with healthcare team, patients, and
caregivers to integrate safe
and effective care within and across settings. Master’s-prepared
nurses use research and
clinical evidence to inform practice decisions.
Master’s-degree graduates are prepared to gather, document,
and analyze outcome data
that serve as a foundation for decision making and the
implementation of interventions or
strategies to improve care outcomes. The master’s-prepared
nurse uses statistical and
epidemiological principles to synthesize these data,
information, and knowledge to
evaluate and achieve optimal health outcomes.
The usefulness of electronic health records and other health
information management
systems to evaluate care outcomes is improved by standardized
terminologies. Integration
19
of standardized terminologies in information systems supports
day-to-day nursing
practice and also the capacity to enhance interprofessional
communication and generate
standardized data to continuously evaluate and improve practice
(American Nurses
Association, 2008). Master’s-prepared nurses use information
and communication
technologies to provide guidance and oversight for the
development and implementation
of health education programs, evidence-based policies, and
point-of-care practices by
members of the interdisciplinary care team.
Health information is growing exponentially. Health literacy is
a powerful tool in health
promotion, disease prevention, management of chronic
illnesses, and quality of life–all of
which are hallmarks of excellence in nursing practice. Master’s-
prepared nurses serve as
information managers, patient advocates, and educators by
assisting others(including
patients, students, caregivers and healthcare professionals) in
accessing, understanding,
evaluating, and applying health-related information. The
master’s-prepared nurse designs
and implements education programs for cohorts of patients or
other healthcare providers
using information and communication technologies.
The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to:
1. Analyze current and emerging technologies to support safe
practice environments,
and to optimize patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and health
outcomes.
2. Evaluate outcome data using current communication
technologies, information
systems, and statistical principles to develop strategies to
reduce risks and improve
health outcomes.
3. Promote policies that incorporate ethical principles and
standards for the use of health
and information technologies.
4. Provide oversight and guidance in the integration of
technologies to document patient
care and improve patient outcomes.
5. Use information and communication technologies, resources,
and principles of
learning to teach patients and others.
6. Use current and emerging technologies in the care
environment to support lifelong
learning for self and others.
Sample Content
• Use of technology, information management systems, and
standardized
terminology
20
• Use of standardized terminologies to document and analyze
nursing care
outcomes
• Bio-health informatics
• Regulatory requirements for electronic data monitoring
systems
• Ethical and legal issues related to the use of information
technology, including
copyright, privacy, and confidentiality issues
• Retrieval information systems, including access, evaluation of
data, and
application of relevant data to patient care
• Statistical principles and analyses of outcome data
• Online review and resources for evidence-based practice
• Use and implementation of technology for virtual care
delivery and monitoring
• Electronic health record, including policies related to the
implementation of and
use to impact care outcomes
• Complementary roles of the master’s-prepared nursing and
information
technology professionals, including nurse informaticist and
quality officer
• Use of technology to analyze data sets and their use to
evaluate patient care
outcomes
• Effective use of educational/instructional technology
• Point-of-care information systems and decision support
systems
Essential VI: Health Policy and Advocacy
Rationale
The healthcare environment is ever-evolving and influenced by
technological, economic,
political, and sociocultural factors locally and globally.
Graduates of master’s degree
nursing programs have requisite knowledge and skills to
promote health, help shape the
health delivery system, and advance values like social justice
through policy processes
and advocacy. Nursing’s call to political activism and policy
advocacy emerges from
many different viewpoints. As more evidence links the broad
psychosocial, economic,
and cultural factors to health status, nurses are compelled to
incorporate these factors into
their approach to care. Most often, policy processes and system-
level strategies yield the
strongest influence on these broad determinants of health. Being
accountable for
improving the quality of healthcare delivery, nurses must
understand the legal and
political determinants of the system and have the requisite skills
to partner for an
improved system. Nurses’ involvement in policy debates brings
our professional values
to bear on the process (Warner, 2003). Master’s-prepared nurses
will use their political
efficacy and competence to improve the health outcomes of
populations and improve the
quality of the healthcare delivery system.
21
Policy shapes healthcare systems, influences social
determinants of health, and therefore
determines accessibility, accountability, and affordability of
health care. Health policy
creates conditions that promote or impede equity in access to
care and health outcomes.
Implementing strategies that address health disparities serves as
a prelude to influencing
policy formation. In order to influence policy, the master’s-
prepared nurse needs to work
within and affect change in systems. To effectively collaborate
with stakeholders, the
master’s-prepared nurse must understand the fiscal context in
which they are practicing
and make the linkages among policy, financing, and access to
quality health care. The
graduate must understand the principles of healthcare
economics, finance, payment
methods, and the relationships between policy and health
economics.
Advocacy for patients, the profession, and health-promoting
policies is operationalized in
divergent ways. Attributes of advocacy include safeguarding
autonomy, promoting social
justice, using ethical principles, and empowering self and others
(Grace, 2001; Hanks,
2007; Xiaoyan & Jezewski, 2006). Giving voice and persuasion
to needs and preferred
direction at the individual, institution, state, or federal policy
level is integral for the
master’s-prepared nurse.
The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to:
1. Analyze how policies influence the structure and financing of
health care,
practice, and health outcomes.
2. Participate in the development and implementation of
institutional, local, and state
and federal policy.
3. Examine the effect of legal and regulatory processes on
nursing practice,
healthcare delivery, and outcomes.
4. Interpret research, bringing the nursing perspective, for
policy makers and
stakeholders.
5. Advocate for policies that improve the health of the public
and the profession of
nursing.
Sample Content
• Policy process: development, implementation, and evaluation
• Structure of healthcare delivery systems
• Theories and models of policy making
• Policy making environments: values, economies, politics,
social
• Policy-making process at various levels of government
• Ethical and value-based frameworks guiding policy making
22
• General principles of microeconomics and macroeconomics,
accounting, and
marketing strategies.
• Globalization and global health
• Interaction between regulatory processes and quality control
• Health disparities
• Social justice
• Political activism
• Economics of health care
Essential VII: Interprofessional Collaboration for Improving
Patient and
Population Health Outcomes
Rationale
In a redesigned health system a greater emphasis will be placed
on cooperation,
communication, and collaboration among all health
professionals in order to integrate
care in teams and ensure that care is continuous and reliable.
Therefore, an expert panel
at the Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified working in
interdisciplinary teams as one of
the five core competencies for all health professionals (IOM,
2003).
Interprofessional collaboration is critical for achieving clinical
prevention and health
promotion goals in order to improve patient and population
health outcomes (APTR,
2008; 2009). Interprofessional practice is critical for improving
patient care outcomes
and, therefore, a key component of health professional
education and lifelong learning
(American Association of Colleges of Nursing & the
Association of American Medical
Colleges, 2010).
The IOM also recognized the need for care providers to
demonstrate a greater awareness
to “patient values, preferences, and cultural values,” consistent
with the Healthy People
2010 goal of achieving health equity through interprofessional
approaches (USHHS,
2000). In this context, knowledge of broad determinants of
health will enable the
master’s graduate to succeed as a patient advocate, cultural and
systems broker, and to
lead and coordinate interprofessional teams across care
environments in order to reduce
barriers, facilitate access to care, and improve health outcomes.
Successfully leading
these teams is achieved through skill development and
demonstrating effective
communication, planning, and implementation of care directly
with other healthcare
professionals (AACN, 2007).
Improving patient and population health outcomes is contingent
on both horizontal and
vertical health delivery systems that integrate research and
clinical expertise to provide
patient-centered care. Inherently the systems must include
patients’ expressed values,
needs, and preferences for shared decision making and
management of their care. As
23
members and leaders of interprofessional teams, the master’s-
prepared nurse will actively
communicate, collaborate, and consult with other health
professionals to manage and
coordinate care across systems.
The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to:
1. Advocate for the value and role of the professional nurse as
member and leader of
interprofessional healthcare teams.
2. Understand other health professions’ scopes of practice to
maximize contributions
within the healthcare team.
3. Employ collaborative strategies in the design, coordination,
and evaluation of
patient-centered care.
4. Use effective communication strategies to develop,
participate, and lead
interprofessional teams and partnerships.
5. Mentor and coach new and experienced nurses and other
members of the
healthcare team.
6. Functions as an effective group leader or member based on an
in-depth
understanding of team dynamics and group processes.
Sample Content
• Scopes of practice for nursing and other professions
• Differing world views among healthcare team members
• Concepts of communication, collaboration, and coordination
• Conflict management strategies and principles of negotiation
• Organizational processes to enhance communication
• Types of teams and team roles
• Stages of team development
• Diversity of teams
• Cultural diversity
• Patient-centered care
• Change theories
• Multiple-intelligence theory
• Group dynamics
• Power structures
• Health-work environments
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx

More Related Content

Similar to Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx

ESSENTIALS OF EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE Infection Control Octo.docx
ESSENTIALS OF EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE Infection Control Octo.docxESSENTIALS OF EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE Infection Control Octo.docx
ESSENTIALS OF EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE Infection Control Octo.docx
elbanglis
 
Antibiotic Stewardship in Inpatient Settings Quality Improvement Proposal.docx
Antibiotic Stewardship in Inpatient Settings Quality Improvement Proposal.docxAntibiotic Stewardship in Inpatient Settings Quality Improvement Proposal.docx
Antibiotic Stewardship in Inpatient Settings Quality Improvement Proposal.docx
4934bk
 
Unwashed Hands Essay
Unwashed Hands EssayUnwashed Hands Essay
Unwashed Hands Essay
Jennifer Perry
 
Critical care nurses' knowledge and compliance with ventilator associated pne...
Critical care nurses' knowledge and compliance with ventilator associated pne...Critical care nurses' knowledge and compliance with ventilator associated pne...
Critical care nurses' knowledge and compliance with ventilator associated pne...
Alexander Decker
 
Assessing the and Cost Considerations.pdf
Assessing the and Cost Considerations.pdfAssessing the and Cost Considerations.pdf
Assessing the and Cost Considerations.pdf
bkbk37
 
Fighting the superbug
Fighting the superbugFighting the superbug
Fighting the superbugElin Boyd
 
Change Implementation Plan for Combating Hospital-Acqu.docx
Change Implementation Plan for Combating Hospital-Acqu.docxChange Implementation Plan for Combating Hospital-Acqu.docx
Change Implementation Plan for Combating Hospital-Acqu.docx
sleeperharwell
 
Intensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms Capstone.pdf
Intensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms Capstone.pdfIntensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms Capstone.pdf
Intensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms Capstone.pdf
bkbk37
 
CDC-core-elements.pdf
CDC-core-elements.pdfCDC-core-elements.pdf
CDC-core-elements.pdf
ssuser9f80d7
 
Intensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms.pdf
Intensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms.pdfIntensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms.pdf
Intensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms.pdf
bkbk37
 
NURS 8310 Epidemiology and Population HealthMajor Assessment Ov.docx
NURS 8310 Epidemiology and Population HealthMajor Assessment Ov.docxNURS 8310 Epidemiology and Population HealthMajor Assessment Ov.docx
NURS 8310 Epidemiology and Population HealthMajor Assessment Ov.docx
cherishwinsland
 
Essential medicine for healthcare and medicine
Essential medicine for healthcare and medicineEssential medicine for healthcare and medicine
Essential medicine for healthcare and medicine
pranav932589
 
SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno.docx
SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno.docxSYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno.docx
SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno.docx
deanmtaylor1545
 
SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno
SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A KnoSYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno
SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno
lisandrai1k
 
Preventative Healthcare Associated Infections Through Hand Hygiene- Training ...
Preventative Healthcare Associated Infections Through Hand Hygiene- Training ...Preventative Healthcare Associated Infections Through Hand Hygiene- Training ...
Preventative Healthcare Associated Infections Through Hand Hygiene- Training ...
Innovations2Solutions
 
Intensive care nurses’ knowledge & practices regarding
Intensive care nurses’ knowledge & practices regardingIntensive care nurses’ knowledge & practices regarding
Intensive care nurses’ knowledge & practices regarding
Alexander Decker
 
White Paper - Infection Preventionists: Healthcare’s Guardians at the Gate Ne...
White Paper - Infection Preventionists: Healthcare’s Guardians at the Gate Ne...White Paper - Infection Preventionists: Healthcare’s Guardians at the Gate Ne...
White Paper - Infection Preventionists: Healthcare’s Guardians at the Gate Ne...
Q-Centrix
 
Hai policy toolkit
Hai policy toolkitHai policy toolkit
Hai policy toolkit
sandraduhrkopp
 

Similar to Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx (20)

ESSENTIALS OF EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE Infection Control Octo.docx
ESSENTIALS OF EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE Infection Control Octo.docxESSENTIALS OF EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE Infection Control Octo.docx
ESSENTIALS OF EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE Infection Control Octo.docx
 
Antibiotic Stewardship in Inpatient Settings Quality Improvement Proposal.docx
Antibiotic Stewardship in Inpatient Settings Quality Improvement Proposal.docxAntibiotic Stewardship in Inpatient Settings Quality Improvement Proposal.docx
Antibiotic Stewardship in Inpatient Settings Quality Improvement Proposal.docx
 
Unwashed Hands Essay
Unwashed Hands EssayUnwashed Hands Essay
Unwashed Hands Essay
 
Critical care nurses' knowledge and compliance with ventilator associated pne...
Critical care nurses' knowledge and compliance with ventilator associated pne...Critical care nurses' knowledge and compliance with ventilator associated pne...
Critical care nurses' knowledge and compliance with ventilator associated pne...
 
Assessing the and Cost Considerations.pdf
Assessing the and Cost Considerations.pdfAssessing the and Cost Considerations.pdf
Assessing the and Cost Considerations.pdf
 
Clorox Report
Clorox ReportClorox Report
Clorox Report
 
Fighting the superbug
Fighting the superbugFighting the superbug
Fighting the superbug
 
Change Implementation Plan for Combating Hospital-Acqu.docx
Change Implementation Plan for Combating Hospital-Acqu.docxChange Implementation Plan for Combating Hospital-Acqu.docx
Change Implementation Plan for Combating Hospital-Acqu.docx
 
Intensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms Capstone.pdf
Intensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms Capstone.pdfIntensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms Capstone.pdf
Intensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms Capstone.pdf
 
CDC-core-elements.pdf
CDC-core-elements.pdfCDC-core-elements.pdf
CDC-core-elements.pdf
 
Intensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms.pdf
Intensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms.pdfIntensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms.pdf
Intensive Healthcare Facilities and Rooms.pdf
 
NURS 8310 Epidemiology and Population HealthMajor Assessment Ov.docx
NURS 8310 Epidemiology and Population HealthMajor Assessment Ov.docxNURS 8310 Epidemiology and Population HealthMajor Assessment Ov.docx
NURS 8310 Epidemiology and Population HealthMajor Assessment Ov.docx
 
Essential medicine for healthcare and medicine
Essential medicine for healthcare and medicineEssential medicine for healthcare and medicine
Essential medicine for healthcare and medicine
 
SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno.docx
SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno.docxSYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno.docx
SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno.docx
 
SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno
SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A KnoSYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno
SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUALITY IMPROVEMENTFrom Cues to Nudge A Kno
 
Preventative Healthcare Associated Infections Through Hand Hygiene- Training ...
Preventative Healthcare Associated Infections Through Hand Hygiene- Training ...Preventative Healthcare Associated Infections Through Hand Hygiene- Training ...
Preventative Healthcare Associated Infections Through Hand Hygiene- Training ...
 
Intensive care nurses’ knowledge & practices regarding
Intensive care nurses’ knowledge & practices regardingIntensive care nurses’ knowledge & practices regarding
Intensive care nurses’ knowledge & practices regarding
 
White Paper - Infection Preventionists: Healthcare’s Guardians at the Gate Ne...
White Paper - Infection Preventionists: Healthcare’s Guardians at the Gate Ne...White Paper - Infection Preventionists: Healthcare’s Guardians at the Gate Ne...
White Paper - Infection Preventionists: Healthcare’s Guardians at the Gate Ne...
 
HH&HAIs_Wenning
HH&HAIs_WenningHH&HAIs_Wenning
HH&HAIs_Wenning
 
Hai policy toolkit
Hai policy toolkitHai policy toolkit
Hai policy toolkit
 

More from todd521

Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (= 50 CHARACTERS)TitleAu.docx
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (= 50 CHARACTERS)TitleAu.docxRunning head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (= 50 CHARACTERS)TitleAu.docx
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (= 50 CHARACTERS)TitleAu.docx
todd521
 
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS) .docx
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS)    .docxRunning head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS)    .docx
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS) .docx
todd521
 
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS) .docx
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS)        .docxRunning head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS)        .docx
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS) .docx
todd521
 
Running head SEMESTER PAPER .docx
Running head SEMESTER PAPER                                  .docxRunning head SEMESTER PAPER                                  .docx
Running head SEMESTER PAPER .docx
todd521
 
Running Head Sherry’s Personal Leadership Plan1Sherry’s P.docx
Running Head Sherry’s Personal Leadership Plan1Sherry’s P.docxRunning Head Sherry’s Personal Leadership Plan1Sherry’s P.docx
Running Head Sherry’s Personal Leadership Plan1Sherry’s P.docx
todd521
 
Running Head SHARING CLINICAL DATASHARING CLINICAL DATA.docx
Running Head SHARING CLINICAL DATASHARING CLINICAL DATA.docxRunning Head SHARING CLINICAL DATASHARING CLINICAL DATA.docx
Running Head SHARING CLINICAL DATASHARING CLINICAL DATA.docx
todd521
 
Running head SERIAL KILLER-JEFFREY DAHMER1SERIAL KILLER.docx
Running head SERIAL KILLER-JEFFREY DAHMER1SERIAL KILLER.docxRunning head SERIAL KILLER-JEFFREY DAHMER1SERIAL KILLER.docx
Running head SERIAL KILLER-JEFFREY DAHMER1SERIAL KILLER.docx
todd521
 
Running Head Sexuality education in schoolsSexuality .docx
Running Head Sexuality education in schoolsSexuality .docxRunning Head Sexuality education in schoolsSexuality .docx
Running Head Sexuality education in schoolsSexuality .docx
todd521
 
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docxRunning Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
todd521
 
Running head SETTING UP RESEARCH1 Chapter 6 Methods of Measu.docx
Running head SETTING UP RESEARCH1  Chapter 6 Methods of Measu.docxRunning head SETTING UP RESEARCH1  Chapter 6 Methods of Measu.docx
Running head SETTING UP RESEARCH1 Chapter 6 Methods of Measu.docx
todd521
 
Running head SEx as a protected class 1SEx as a protected clas.docx
Running head SEx as a protected class 1SEx as a protected clas.docxRunning head SEx as a protected class 1SEx as a protected clas.docx
Running head SEx as a protected class 1SEx as a protected clas.docx
todd521
 
Running head SETTING UP COMPANY 1SETTING UP .docx
Running head SETTING UP COMPANY                 1SETTING UP .docxRunning head SETTING UP COMPANY                 1SETTING UP .docx
Running head SETTING UP COMPANY 1SETTING UP .docx
todd521
 
Running head SERVING LEARNING ORGANIZATION ROUGH DRAFT1SERVI.docx
Running head SERVING LEARNING ORGANIZATION ROUGH DRAFT1SERVI.docxRunning head SERVING LEARNING ORGANIZATION ROUGH DRAFT1SERVI.docx
Running head SERVING LEARNING ORGANIZATION ROUGH DRAFT1SERVI.docx
todd521
 
Running Head SETTING A BUDGET1SETTING A BUDGET 6.docx
Running Head SETTING A BUDGET1SETTING A BUDGET 6.docxRunning Head SETTING A BUDGET1SETTING A BUDGET 6.docx
Running Head SETTING A BUDGET1SETTING A BUDGET 6.docx
todd521
 
Running Head SERVANT LEADERSHIP1SERVANT LEADERSHIP2.docx
Running Head SERVANT LEADERSHIP1SERVANT LEADERSHIP2.docxRunning Head SERVANT LEADERSHIP1SERVANT LEADERSHIP2.docx
Running Head SERVANT LEADERSHIP1SERVANT LEADERSHIP2.docx
todd521
 
Running Head Security Technologies IdentifiedProject .docx
Running Head Security Technologies IdentifiedProject .docxRunning Head Security Technologies IdentifiedProject .docx
Running Head Security Technologies IdentifiedProject .docx
todd521
 
Running head SELECTING RESEARCH DIRECTION AND QUESTIONS1SELE.docx
Running head SELECTING RESEARCH DIRECTION AND QUESTIONS1SELE.docxRunning head SELECTING RESEARCH DIRECTION AND QUESTIONS1SELE.docx
Running head SELECTING RESEARCH DIRECTION AND QUESTIONS1SELE.docx
todd521
 
Running head SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR 1SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIO.docx
Running head SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR 1SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIO.docxRunning head SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR 1SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIO.docx
Running head SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR 1SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIO.docx
todd521
 
Running Head SECURITY MODEL 1SECURITY MODEL 7.docx
Running Head SECURITY MODEL 1SECURITY MODEL 7.docxRunning Head SECURITY MODEL 1SECURITY MODEL 7.docx
Running Head SECURITY MODEL 1SECURITY MODEL 7.docx
todd521
 
Running head SECURITY MECHANISM1SECURITY MECHANISM 2.docx
Running head SECURITY MECHANISM1SECURITY MECHANISM 2.docxRunning head SECURITY MECHANISM1SECURITY MECHANISM 2.docx
Running head SECURITY MECHANISM1SECURITY MECHANISM 2.docx
todd521
 

More from todd521 (20)

Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (= 50 CHARACTERS)TitleAu.docx
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (= 50 CHARACTERS)TitleAu.docxRunning head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (= 50 CHARACTERS)TitleAu.docx
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (= 50 CHARACTERS)TitleAu.docx
 
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS) .docx
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS)    .docxRunning head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS)    .docx
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS) .docx
 
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS) .docx
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS)        .docxRunning head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS)        .docx
Running head SHORT TITLE OF PAPER (50 CHARACTERS OR LESS) .docx
 
Running head SEMESTER PAPER .docx
Running head SEMESTER PAPER                                  .docxRunning head SEMESTER PAPER                                  .docx
Running head SEMESTER PAPER .docx
 
Running Head Sherry’s Personal Leadership Plan1Sherry’s P.docx
Running Head Sherry’s Personal Leadership Plan1Sherry’s P.docxRunning Head Sherry’s Personal Leadership Plan1Sherry’s P.docx
Running Head Sherry’s Personal Leadership Plan1Sherry’s P.docx
 
Running Head SHARING CLINICAL DATASHARING CLINICAL DATA.docx
Running Head SHARING CLINICAL DATASHARING CLINICAL DATA.docxRunning Head SHARING CLINICAL DATASHARING CLINICAL DATA.docx
Running Head SHARING CLINICAL DATASHARING CLINICAL DATA.docx
 
Running head SERIAL KILLER-JEFFREY DAHMER1SERIAL KILLER.docx
Running head SERIAL KILLER-JEFFREY DAHMER1SERIAL KILLER.docxRunning head SERIAL KILLER-JEFFREY DAHMER1SERIAL KILLER.docx
Running head SERIAL KILLER-JEFFREY DAHMER1SERIAL KILLER.docx
 
Running Head Sexuality education in schoolsSexuality .docx
Running Head Sexuality education in schoolsSexuality .docxRunning Head Sexuality education in schoolsSexuality .docx
Running Head Sexuality education in schoolsSexuality .docx
 
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docxRunning Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
 
Running head SETTING UP RESEARCH1 Chapter 6 Methods of Measu.docx
Running head SETTING UP RESEARCH1  Chapter 6 Methods of Measu.docxRunning head SETTING UP RESEARCH1  Chapter 6 Methods of Measu.docx
Running head SETTING UP RESEARCH1 Chapter 6 Methods of Measu.docx
 
Running head SEx as a protected class 1SEx as a protected clas.docx
Running head SEx as a protected class 1SEx as a protected clas.docxRunning head SEx as a protected class 1SEx as a protected clas.docx
Running head SEx as a protected class 1SEx as a protected clas.docx
 
Running head SETTING UP COMPANY 1SETTING UP .docx
Running head SETTING UP COMPANY                 1SETTING UP .docxRunning head SETTING UP COMPANY                 1SETTING UP .docx
Running head SETTING UP COMPANY 1SETTING UP .docx
 
Running head SERVING LEARNING ORGANIZATION ROUGH DRAFT1SERVI.docx
Running head SERVING LEARNING ORGANIZATION ROUGH DRAFT1SERVI.docxRunning head SERVING LEARNING ORGANIZATION ROUGH DRAFT1SERVI.docx
Running head SERVING LEARNING ORGANIZATION ROUGH DRAFT1SERVI.docx
 
Running Head SETTING A BUDGET1SETTING A BUDGET 6.docx
Running Head SETTING A BUDGET1SETTING A BUDGET 6.docxRunning Head SETTING A BUDGET1SETTING A BUDGET 6.docx
Running Head SETTING A BUDGET1SETTING A BUDGET 6.docx
 
Running Head SERVANT LEADERSHIP1SERVANT LEADERSHIP2.docx
Running Head SERVANT LEADERSHIP1SERVANT LEADERSHIP2.docxRunning Head SERVANT LEADERSHIP1SERVANT LEADERSHIP2.docx
Running Head SERVANT LEADERSHIP1SERVANT LEADERSHIP2.docx
 
Running Head Security Technologies IdentifiedProject .docx
Running Head Security Technologies IdentifiedProject .docxRunning Head Security Technologies IdentifiedProject .docx
Running Head Security Technologies IdentifiedProject .docx
 
Running head SELECTING RESEARCH DIRECTION AND QUESTIONS1SELE.docx
Running head SELECTING RESEARCH DIRECTION AND QUESTIONS1SELE.docxRunning head SELECTING RESEARCH DIRECTION AND QUESTIONS1SELE.docx
Running head SELECTING RESEARCH DIRECTION AND QUESTIONS1SELE.docx
 
Running head SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR 1SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIO.docx
Running head SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR 1SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIO.docxRunning head SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR 1SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIO.docx
Running head SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR 1SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIO.docx
 
Running Head SECURITY MODEL 1SECURITY MODEL 7.docx
Running Head SECURITY MODEL 1SECURITY MODEL 7.docxRunning Head SECURITY MODEL 1SECURITY MODEL 7.docx
Running Head SECURITY MODEL 1SECURITY MODEL 7.docx
 
Running head SECURITY MECHANISM1SECURITY MECHANISM 2.docx
Running head SECURITY MECHANISM1SECURITY MECHANISM 2.docxRunning head SECURITY MECHANISM1SECURITY MECHANISM 2.docx
Running head SECURITY MECHANISM1SECURITY MECHANISM 2.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
siemaillard
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
DeeptiGupta154
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Anna Sz.
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Mohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
 
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxPalestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
RaedMohamed3
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
Vivekanand Anglo Vedic Academy
 
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleHow to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
Celine George
 
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdfSectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Vivekanand Anglo Vedic Academy
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
GeoBlogs
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Atul Kumar Singh
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Balvir Singh
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
Jisc
 
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative ThoughtsHow to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
Col Mukteshwar Prasad
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
joachimlavalley1
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
Special education needs
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
siemaillard
 
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
rosedainty
 
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement EssentialsIntroduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Excellence Foundation for South Sudan
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
 
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxPalestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
 
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleHow to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
 
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdfSectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
 
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative ThoughtsHow to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
 
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement EssentialsIntroduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
 

Running head RESEARCH PAPER1RESEARCH PAPER15.docx

  • 1. Running head: RESEARCH PAPER 1 RESEARCH PAPER 15 Assessment of the knowledge, practice, and the associated factors of Healthcare Acquired Infection Prevention Name Institutional Affiliation Date Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Assessment of the knowledge, practice, and the associated factors of Healthcare Acquired Infection Prevention in Blessings Healthcare Facility 4 The Problem 5 Significance of the problem 6 Purpose of this study 7 Research Questions 8 Masters Essentials aligned with the topic 8 Design 10 Literature Review 10 Methodology and the design of the study 13 Sampling Methods 14 Necessary tools 14 Any logarithm or flow map developed 15 Healthcare Facility 15
  • 2. Implementation 15 Stage 1: Assessment of the current practices (One Week) 16 Stage 2: Identification of the factors leading to high cases of healthcare-acquired infection (5 days) 17 Stage 3: Pre-Training (Two Weeks) 17 Stage 4: Training (5 weeks) 17 Stage 5: an ongoing process of assessing the situation 18 Materials, activities and the cost 20 Results 21 Socio-demographics features of the research population 21 Knowledge concerning the infection prevention 23 Aspects related to the knowledge of the healthcare professionals regarding the issue of preventing healthcare-acquired infections 27 Limitation of the study 28 References 30 Assessment of the knowledge, practice, and the associated factors of Healthcare Acquired Infection Prevention Healthcare acquired infection/nosocomial infection/hospital acquired infections are becoming a major international challenge in many healthcare facilities especially in the low or middle income nations. It is anticipated that around 10 percent of patients in the healthcare facilities from developing nations are developing healthcare acquired infections and this subsequently leads to negative impacts on healthcare outcomes. It also leads to increase hospital stay, economic burden, morbidity cases, and increase in the mortality incidences. Some of the common healthcare acquired infections include Hepatitis B and C virus, HIV infections, and even Tuberculosis which are often transmitted by healthcare workers who are not observing the practice related to the infection prevention measures. According to the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention, there are about 1.7 million patients who have been hospitalized as a result of acquiring infection within
  • 3. the facilities while undergoing treatment for other healthcare concerns. Many studies reveal that simple infection control procedures like cleaning of the hands using alcohol-based hand rub is helping in the prevention of the spread of the disease. The increase in the infection rate caused by the healthcare acquired infection is due to the poor practices of infection prevention and control, lack of knowledge or failure to implement knowledge related to the process of preventing and controlling nosocomial illnesses, and other associated factors (Desta, Ayenew, Sitotaw, Tegegne, Dires, & Getie, 2018). The Problem The high burden of nosocomial infections is as a result of the absent of the standardized infection control prevention program in place. The main reason why there is absence of standardized infection prevention procedures is as a result of inadequate resources, improper sanitary situation and the poor hygienic practices. Healthcare infections which were absence at time when a patient is being admitted are acquired by patients during the process of healthcare services within the hospital. Healthcare providers are considered to be in the front line with regard to the process of ensuring that there is self protection as well as making sure that patients are free from infections (Haque, Sartelli, McKimm, & Bakar, 2018). The process of preventing infection prevention is involving and it involves the placing of major barriers between the vulnerable hosts and the pathogens as well as some of the major components of the safe and improved quality of services being delivered at the healthcare facility level. Therefore, healthcare acquired infections related mortality and morbidity can be prevented through having an effective prevention program such as proper hand hygiene. The process of implementing the standard precautions such as safety injections, isolations precautions, bathing among patients, antibiotic use or stewardship, vaccinations, environmental cleaning, disinfections, and the sterilization process through successful comprehensive departmental based safety program as well as
  • 4. surveillance are important steps which can be relied on for the purposes of control and prevention of the infections. In resource constraint facilities, it is becoming hard to control infections rates of clients who are acquiring healthcare infections as well as the exposure of healthcare workers to such infections. There are some of simple standard precaution procedures as well as improved knowledge which have been found to be important when it comes to the reduction of the infections. Even though there is existence of such evidences in relation to availability of the level of awareness and practices in preventing infections and the associated aspects, there are reduced cases of exploiting such knowledge, practices, and the associated factors many healthcare facilities. Significance of the problem Low-cost intervention processes are available to help in preventing or controlling the cases of nosocomial infections. Majority of healthcare knowledge as well as adherence to the infection prevention is still very minimal. This therefore implies that improvement of knowledge as well as practice of healthcare employees with regard to the prevention of infection is important when it comes to the reduction of the burden caused by the healthcare acquired infections. The outcomes of this research work will be important as an contribution for the policy makers, programmers, and healthcare employees towards improvement of the clinical services and the means of achieving sustainable development objectives. Identification of this problem is also important when it comes to the reduction of the mortality cases. The study of this problem is helping in the generation of the meaningful data with regard to the practices, knowledge, and other associated factors of healthcare acquired infections. This is important in processing the measuring the outcome of the patient safety practices. Through monitoring the process and the outcome measures as well as the evaluation of the existing relationship is important in establishing the good process which results in good health care outcomes.
  • 5. Through identification of the problem related to the knowledge, practices and the associated factors in healthcare acquired infections, it is possible to have an effective process measure which is giving a reflection of the common practices which can be applied in healthcare setting. It enables the facility to make a selection of the outcome measures related to the occurrence, harshness, and the preventability of the outcome proceedings. It is estimated that over 1.7 million patients are suffering from the nosocomial infections in the United States. The overall direct cost of infections to healthcare facility is ranging between $ 28 billion to $ 45 billion. Even though this range appears to be wider, healthcare acquired infections seem to be expensive. Additionally, some of these diseases are preventable; nevertheless, few healthcare facilities are still faced with the problem of controlling the issue. Therefore, identification of the gap with regard to the control of healthcare acquired infections is important in reducing its rate thus helping the nation and healthcare facilities to reduce the expenditures on treatment of the patients with nosocomial infections. The increased expenditure by the clients or the government is also associated with longer stay in the hospital due to the re-infection (Stone, 2017). Purpose of this study This study is therefore aimed at investigating the knowledge as well as the routine practices aimed at preventing of the hospital associated infection and its associated factors of preventing infection amongst healthcare providers. The outcome of this study is important towards development and implementation of the policies to help in addressing the existing gaps that is present in addressing issues of hospital associated infections.Research Questions This study will be guided by the following questions to help in meeting the objectives or the purpose of the study. These questions include: · What are some of the prevention practices in place to help in the control of healthcare acquired infections?
  • 6. · What is the knowledge of the healthcare providers with regard to the prevention and control of healthcare acquired infections? · What are the associated factors with the knowledge of healthcare providers regarding the infection prevention? Masters Essentials aligned with the topic One of the most important essential with regard to the process of preventing nosocomial infections is the quality improvement and safety. Improvement in the quality of healthcare services as well as safety of the patients is an ongoing process within every department of the hospitals. It is important for the mastered prepared nurse to have the ability of articulating the techniques, equipment, the performance of measures, culture of the safety values, and the standards related to quality, and should be prepared to use quality principles in the organization. It also requires nurses to be an agent of change. The issues of hospital associated infections are becoming a major concern in many healthcare facilities. In order to overcome the challenges faced in ensuring that there is minimization of nosocomial infections, joint effort is required from both healthcare providers particularly nurses who are continuously interacting directly with the nurses to help in the reduction of the issue. Joint forces are needed to have a change in the practice as well as share the knowledge needed to help in reducing healthcare acquired infections. Another important essential is the health policy and advocacy. There is a continuous change in the healthcare sector and this is influenced by the technological, economic, political, and the social-cultural aspects. Graduate master’s degree nursing program is having a requisite knowledge as well as skills needed towards promotion of health, helping in shaping the healthcare delivery, and the advancement of the values such as social justice through processing of policies processes and advocacy. As advocates, it is the responsibility of healthcare providers such as nurses to ensure that there is a change in the way through which the issue nosocomial infections is dealt with. Nurses and other healthcare providers need to look for
  • 7. alternative approaches through advocating for the new policies and incorporate them into healthcare system within the organization. Nurses have to be responsible towards making an improvement to the quality of healthcare delivery through understanding the political determinants of the system as well as using the knowledge learned in the class work to advocate for the change in the healthcare provision policies related to the prevention of hospital associated infections. Collaboration towards making an improvement to the patients and population healthcare outcomes is another important essential. Healthcare providers must work together towards ensuring that the implementation processes of the new policies related to the prevention of infection is achieved. Design Literature Review Healthcare acquired infections constitute a major public health issue and it is affecting millions of people on a yearly basis. The approximation from the recent studies is showing more than 5 percent of the hospitalized patients are exposed to nosocomial infections. Many studies further shows that the surgical site infections are the common infections associated with nosocomial infections and it is contributing to about 30 percent of all healthcare acquired infections cases. Study by Ayed et al (2015) shows that healthcare providers are continuously exposed to pathogens which are sometimes severe and lethal. Nurses specifically are more exposed to different infections during the course of providing healthcare services to the patients. This study indicates that it is therefore crucial for nurses to possess sound knowledge as well as strict adherence to the infection control practices. Updating the acquaintance and the practices of nurses through involvement in ongoing in-service educational programs and putting more focus on the role of the current evidence-based practices of infection prevention in the continuous training is important. Provision of the training to the newly recruited nurses regarding the infection control frequently as well as replicating the study through observation checklist is necessary
  • 8. in assessing the level of practice (Imad, Ayed, Faeda, & Lubna, 2015). Study by Desta et al (2018) reveals that working experience is a stronger predictor of the knowledge in relation to the prevention of the infection. In this study, the goal was to the relationship between the acquaintance, practice and connected aspects of infection prevention among healthcare employees. Education level is a key determinant to the level of experience when it comes to the control or the prevention of infections. According to this study, it is clear that healthcare providers with advanced experience as well as advanced age are significantly linked with the knowledge. This is basically based on the fact that as healthcare providers are getting older, they are more likely to have advance knowledge due to their experiences as well as having worked with their seniors (Desta, Ayenew, Sitotaw, Tegegne, Dires, & Getie, 2018). Teshager et al (2015) also studies the knowledge, practices, and the related aspects towards the reduction or prevention of the surgical site infections among nurses who were employed in Amhara Regional State Referral healthcare facilities, in the Northwest Ethiopia. This study looked at some of the factors linked with the knowledge of the nurses regarding the prevention of the surgical site infections. Based on the bivariate analysis of this study, the age, year of service, sex of the participants, and training on the infection prevention techniques were found to be the key factors associated with the knowledge on the prevention of infections. On the other hand, the year of service, sex, and the training on the infection prevention were found to be greatly linked to the multivariate assessment (Teshager, Engeda, & Worku, 2015). Based on the outcome of the analysis, males nurses are three time more likely to be knowledgeable on the prevention of the surgical site infections as compared to the female counterparts. Nurses who have served for more than five years were twice more likely to be knowledgeable on the issue of infection prevention as compared to the healthcare employees
  • 9. who have worked for less than five years. Nurses who have been involved in the training program related to the prevention of the infection techniques were twice more likely to be knowledgeable regarding the prevention of the surgical site infections as compared to nurses who have never attended such trainings. Human are playing an important role in healthcare acquired infections and therefore adequate nurse staffing is important. Batran et al (2018) in their study on whether the standard precautions for healthcare acquired infection among nurses working in the public sector is satisfactory indicates that compliance to the standard precautions by the healthcare providers is related to their knowledge, the standards precaution training, and the experiences they are having. Standards precautions are used as guideline while offering healthcare services to the patients in spite of the supposed infection status. According to this study, the standard precautions are targeted at reducing the transmission of the healthcare acquired infections as well as protecting the nurses and other healthcare providers from the sharp injuries (Batran, Ayed, Salameh, Ayoub, & Fasfous, 2018). Jahangir et al (2017) aimed at assessing the knowledge and the practices of the nurses in relation to the spreading of the healthcare acquired infections within the government healthcare facilities in Lahore. Based on this study, it was evident that nurses are having knowledge regarding the spread of nosocomial infections. They are also well informed regarding the safety precautions and the use of alcohol based formulation. Nevertheless, their practices towards reduction of the spread of the hospital associated infections are at unsatisfactory level. This study also reveals that nurses are more exposed to acquiring and transmitting hospital associated infections as they provide nursing care to the patients. It is therefore recommended that nurses must have adequate knowledge as well as the practice towards controlling and preventing the spread of nosocomial infections (Jahangir, Ali, & Riaz, 2017).
  • 10. Using standardized precautions to help in the prevention of patient from acquiring nosocomial infections is an important part of the nursing care. Study by Moyo (2013), reveals that many nurses are more concerned about their lives as compared to the patients since they are handling different patients from ward to ward. Alternatively, Ventilator patients are more exposed to the healthcare acquired infections whereby the contaminated equipment can be a source of those infections. Nurses who are delivering healthcare services to these patients are also at higher risk of acquiring illness from such equipment (Moyo, 2013). Methodology and the design of the study This study is an institutional based and it will therefore be done from May 25, 2019 to June 25, 2019. Healthcare providers having qualification of doctors, health officers, nurses, midwives, x-ray technicians, pharmacists, and the laboratory technicians will be selected for this study. Healthcare providers who are ill plus those who are on leave were never included in the study. Self-assessed questionnaire will be utilized to help in the collection of data through distribution at the healthcare workers. The self-administered questionnaire was modified CDC infection prevention and control assessment tool for the acute care healthcare facilities. The questionnaire was organized using English language and the pre-test was performed in the study area on 5 percent of healthcare workers and this was excluded from the actual study to help in evaluation of the content as well as the approach of the questionnaire and some necessary adjustment which were necessary to be made. The analysis of the data will be based on summary of the proportions, frequencies, the average, the score on knowledge is dichotomized as 1 for being knowledgeable and 2 for not being knowledgeable. The practice score is dichotomized as 1 for good practice and 2 for poor practice. Sampling Methods A total of 250 participants will be selected as the
  • 11. population participants. The participants are the healthcare employees who are involved in the direct care of the patients for a period of four weeks in every ward. The systematic random sampling will be used to help in the identification of the study participants through using the list of healthcare employees posted in every ward in the facility as a sampling frame. The first selection of the participant will be based on random selection. The selection of the sample for the study is based on using healthcare providers who are doctors, nurses, midwives, laboratory technologists, pharmacists, and healthcare officers. Necessary tools One of the tools to be used in this study is the self- administered questionnaire to help in the collection of the data. This tool will be adapted from the modified Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the control assessment tool used for the acute care patients. Any logarithm or flow map developed Healthcare Facility Implementation Task Duration Assessment of the current practices 1 week Identification of the factors leading to high cases of healthcare- acquired infection 5 weeks Pre-Training Two weeks Training 5 weeks Process of assessing the situation and communication with the key stakeholders Ongoing process
  • 12. The implementation plan process of this research project is aimed at addressing issues related to the knowledge, practices, and other factors such as the socio-demographic factors, and the healthcare facility factors which are considered to be playing important roles towards the prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. The implementation process for the change implementation plan in reducing the healthcare- acquired infections requires adequate resources which will be necessary towards training the healthcare providers to have the required knowledge needed to improve their skills in relation to the prevention of the healthcare-acquired infections. Resources will also be important in ensuring that the required tools or equipment are purchased to help in ensuring that there effective control or preventive measures in place. Some of the important tools or equipment which will be necessary to be purchased includes the gloves, hydrogen peroxide, alcohol disinfectant, sterilizer machine, and the alcohol hand disinfectant. Other resources or tools required include pens and notebooks which will be important when training the staffs on the safety measures in relation to the process of preventing healthcare-acquired infections. The implementation program towards the reduction of the healthcare-acquired infection will be based on stages. Stage 1: Assessment of the current practices (One Week) The first stage will be involving the process of assessing the current practices in place which are being used towards a reduction of the infection rates. This stage will also involve the assessment of the knowledge of the healthcare providers especially nurses regarding the techniques and the effective methods being used to help in the reduction of infections in the facility. The assessment will also involve looking at some of the steps which have been put in place to help in combating the incidences of the prevention rates within the facility. One week duration will be enough towards ensuring that there is a complete assessment of the areas which requires improvement.Stage 2: Identification of the factors leading to
  • 13. high cases of healthcare-acquired infection (5 days) The second stage will involve the identification of some of the factors which are contributing to the spread of the infection rate within the facility to help in the designing of the effective training approaches which meets the gaps within the facility in relation to the prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. This stage will be taking around 5 days for completion. Stage 3: Pre-Training (Two Weeks) The third stage of the implementation process the pre- training which will take about two weeks. This stage will involve the assessment of the tools and then scheduled for the training sessions (in-person training). Stage 4: Training (5 weeks) The fourth stage will involve the training process whereby there will be a performance of the in-person training sessions towards quality healthcare improvement. Training webinars will be checked in this stage. There will also be a collection of the baseline information; making completion of the implementation preparedness checklist. This stage will take around five weeks.Stage 5: an ongoing process of assessing the situation The next stage will be a continuous bi-weekly gathering to make a continuous assessment of the situation. There will be an updating of the action plans as well as the implementation of the checklist. The last stage will be involving a contours process whereby activities such as continuous weekly meeting will be important to help in determining the challenges being faced as well as the areas which are successful. In this stage, there will be the determination of the successful intervals for the healthcare providers. Frequent collection and analysis of the data regarding the practices towards preventing healthcare- acquired infections will be analyzed. There will be a review of relevant supplementary learning network webinars. There will also be a pilot like interventions through the selection of specific departments or wards which are usually having a continuous flow of patients to
  • 14. help in giving a clear picture regarding the effectiveness of the program. There will be continuous training of the current and new as well as the assessment of the healthcare providers with regard to how they are being affected by socio-demographic factors i.e. age, marital status, religion, ethnicity, level of education, and the work experiences and health facility factors. There will be assigned of the responsibilities to the staffs to help in improving the implementation process aimed at reducing healthcare-acquired infections. Each healthcare provider will be assigned the responsibility with a focus on the identification of the factors which might be further increasing the rate of healthcare-acquired infections other than those which have been identified to be the major contributors. There will be continuous communication and giving reports in relation to the prevention processes. The prevention practices of healthcare-acquired infection are only developed through having a continuous operational procedure which is involving reporting the emerging issues and areas that requires improvement; therefore, through the existence of continuous communication process, it will be possible to deal with the issue of healthcare-acquired infections as a team. Regular assessment of the progress and creating a plan to keep the process of implementation of the targeted practices to other departments within the facility will be of great value. Communication with the key stakeholders of the healthcare facility is another important step and this has to be an ongoing process. Stakeholders, in this case, are the individuals who are directly involved or are affected by the increasing incidences of the healthcare-acquired infections. The stakeholders include patients, healthcare providers; groups providing financial support to the hospital, and the hospital management among others. There will be continuous communication and consultation with the stakeholders to help in rolling out the program as well as expanding the process of building the sustainability of the program. Stakeholders will be important in providing feedback regarding the program aimed at
  • 15. addressing the existing gaps in addressing issues related to the prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. The stakeholders will be helping in identifying the areas which require some form of refinement as well as giving suggestions on the new approaches of initiatives which should be applied or adopted. Continuous cooperation, as well as collaboration with patients, will be important in ensuring that there is a success in improving the process of addressing issues related to the prevention of healthcare-acquired infection. Patients are the highly exposed individuals to healthcare-acquired infection, therefore, an effective process of educating them on how to report and stick by the instruction of the healthcare providers especially those who are placed on an isolated room will be important in helping to reduce the exposure to healthcare- acquired infections such as tuberculosis. With regard to working together with the management of the healthcare facility, the success of the program will be achieved through support from the management. The top management is key stakeholders who are the individuals who are giving go ahead with the process of making an improvement to the issue of concern. Top management will be providing the financial support needed to purchase the materials required towards making the mission of healthcare-acquired infection prevention activities possible. It cannot be possible to make an improvement to the concerns related to the infection if the management is not fully engaged since the project is doom to fail due to a lack of full support. Materials, activities and the cost In order to meet the objective of full implementation of the program, it is important to have the required resources in place. These resources are the materials or the equipment which are supposed to be purchased to help in ensuring that every activity being undertaken such as the training of the staffs as well as engaging the key stakeholders i.e. healthcare providers, management, financial supporters, and the patients are effectively involved in the process of implementation. Therefore the materials and the activity of training and
  • 16. communicating with the stakeholders are categorized below based on the amount required to support each activity or purchase of the materials needed. Materials/ Activities Costs Gloves $ 300 Manila paper for designing the waste segregation protocol $ 15 More laboratory coats $ 100 Hydrogen Peroxide $ 500 Alcohol Disinfectant $ 300 Sterilizer Machine $ 800 Alcohol Hand Disinfectant $ 100 Pens and Notebooks $ 150 Construction of the isolation room $ 5000 Training of healthcare providers $ 3000 Communication with the stakeholders $ 800 Miscellaneous $ 2000 Total $ 13,065 Results Socio-demographics features of the research population Infection prevention is amongst the challenges faced in many healthcare institutions in the entire world. This study assessed the knowledge, practice, and associated factors aimed at reducing or preventing healthcare-acquired infections
  • 17. among healthcare workers. In this particular study, a total of 250 healthcare professionals were interviewed and yields a response rate of 95 percent majorities. There were many individuals i.e. 150 (60 percent) were in the age bracket of 26 to 3o years old. The majority of the respondents were from Orthodox Christianity at 72 percent of the population. A higher percentage of the individuals who participated in this study was diploma holders at 40 percent (100 participants). Overall, based on this particular study, it is clear that the majority of healthcare providers were knowledgeable about the prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. Many of these healthcare providers were having sufficient knowledge required to make a contribution towards helping in reducing healthcare- acquired infections. This study, therefore, shows that the outcomes are in line with many other research works which have shown that healthcare providers are knowledgeable enough to help in the prevention of infection; nevertheless, the issue of controlling or preventing such infection is affected by the attitudes or the socio-demographic factors or lack of adequate resources to accomplish this mission. . Variable Frequency Percentage Age 20 to 25 80 32% 26 to 30 150 60% Over 31 years 20
  • 19. 28 % Diploma 100 40 % Work Experience Over five years 170 68% 5 to 10 years 70 28% Over 10 years 10 4% Profession Physician 30 12% Nurse 82 32.8% Midwifery 60 24% Health officials 18 7.2% Laboratory Technician 40
  • 20. 16% Other healthcare providers 20 8% Involved in the training Yes 90 36% No 160 64% There is availability of IP guideline Yes 100 40% No 150 60% Knowledge concerning the infection prevention In this particular study, a total of 220 (88 percent) and 210 (84 percent) believed that healthcare-acquired infections are prevented using disinfection and antiseptic respectively. A total of 190 respondents (76 percent) believed that equipment requires the process of decontamination prior to the sterilization procedure. More than half of the participants (56 percent) are not well informed regarding the [preparation of 0.5 percent of chlorine solution. Variables The level of knowledge Frequency Disinfection is helpful in the prevention of the acquired
  • 21. infections Ye 220 88 % No 30 12% Antiseptic is helping in the prevention of healthcare-acquired infection Yes 210 84% No 40 16% The is sterilization of the equipment using chemical Yes 100 40% No 150 60 % There is physical sterilization of equipment through the use of heat and radiation occasionally Yes 70 28 % No 180 72% All pathogens are destroyed through autoclaving Yes
  • 22. 170 68% No 80 32% There is a decontamination of equipment before the sterilization process Yes 190 76% No 60 24% Protective devices are important when it comes to the reduction of the infections Yes 185 74% No 65 26% Wearing of gloves is used as a replacement of hand washing Yes 90 64% No 160 36% There is a preparation of o.5 percent chlorine solution Yes 110 44%
  • 23. No 140 56% There is the use of PEP for HIV after being exposed to blood Yes 230 92% No 20 8% The practice of healthcare providers in an effort to prevent healthcare-acquired infections In this particular study, the percentages of the healthcare providers believed it was important to wash hand before starting to provide healthcare and after completion of healthcare provision were 140 (56 percent) and 200 (80 percent) respectively. There was almost equal proportional with regard to the number of respondents who said there is use of soap to wash the hands before patient care i.e. 120 (48 percent) and the individuals who believed that there was no washing of the hands after provision of healthcare services i.e. 130 (52 percent) based on the responses given by the study participants, majority of the respondents believe that there is no use of any type of protective equipment such as mask, gloves, and gowns among others. Only 42 participants (16.8) believed that there is the use of personal protective equipment. The length of working experience is associated with the knowledge score based on the outcome of this study. According to the result of the study, healthcare providers who have been in the medical field for not less than ten years are more likely to be knowledgeable about the issues related to the prevention programs. The increase in the knowledge in relation to the number of experience is likely to be related to the
  • 24. increase in the number of years of practice which increases exposure to different healthcare settings. Such healthcare providers are exposed repeatedly and are becoming more experienced through interacting and taking part in working with senior healthcare providers. Variable Response Figures Frequency There is washing of the hands using soap before prior to the start of healthcare Yes 140 56% No 110 44% There is a habit of washing hand using soap after providing care to the patient Yes 200 80 % No 50 20% There is washing of the hands without soap prior to or after patient care Yes 120 48% No 130 52 %
  • 25. There is the use of all categories of personal protective equipment Ye 42 16.8 No 208 83.2 Aspects related to the knowledge of the healthcare professionals regarding the issue of preventing healthcare-acquired infections Some of the major factors which were associated with the knowledge in relation to the healthcare-acquired prevention included age, education attainment, the work experience of the healthcare providers, sex of the respondents, profession, and training received in relation to the techniques used in the prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. Healthcare providers who are over 31 years were three times more knowledgeable as compared to individuals or healthcare providers whose age bracket was 21 to 25 years. Male healthcare employees were twice likely to be more knowledgeable as compared to their female counterparts. This study also reveals that the working experience strongly influenced the practices towards prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. Individuals with experience of more than ten years of work within healthcare sector were four times likely to possess the knowledge required to help in the control or prevention of healthcare-acquired infections as compared to individuals or healthcare provider who had work experience of fewer than five years in the field of healthcare. This study also indicates that the level of education greatly impacted on the knowledge acquired to help in the prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. In this case, healthcare providers whose education level was in the Master level or above Masters level were more knowledgeable as compared to other levels of education i.e. Bachelors and
  • 26. Diploma. Healthcare providers with a master level of education were thrice more likely to be knowledgeable about the issues related to healthcare-acquired infections. Healthcare workers with Bachelor level of education were twice more likely to be more knowledgeable as compared to the healthcare providers who had a diploma level of education. The infection training program is also playing an important role in increasing the level of experience and knowledge required to help in the reduction of healthcare- acquired infections. Healthcare providers who have not yet received training on the techniques required towards prevention and control of healthcare-acquired infections are less knowledgeable about the infection prevention as compared to those who had undergone through the training program related to the prevention of healthcare-acquired infection. The result from this study indicating that healthcare providers with higher education appear to be having more knowledge score as compared to the low educational level is an indication that these healthcare providers have acquired more educational information related to the prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. Limitation of the study Healthcare-acquired infections are considered to be a very broad topic, therefore, it has not been possible to cover all aspects of the healthcare-acquired infections in this one research paper. This, therefore, implies that I have been selective in choosing the major factors in the present argument with regard to the healthcare-acquired infections which is causing major concern in the public healthcare sector. Another limitation of this study is that it was restricted to a specific healthcare facility. This, therefore, implies that it does not reveal the real situation in the entire world, however, it shows that the clear picture of what is happening in a major healthcare facility in relation to the lack of knowledge, poor practices, and other factors such as socio-demographic aspects. These factors are considered to be playing a major important role in with regard
  • 27. to the issue of healthcare-acquired infections. Another limitation in this study is that it was specifically restricted to the healthcare providers as the key individuals who are playing a role in the increase in the reduction or increase in the healthcare-acquired infections. Even though patients are contributing to the spread of healthcare-acquired infections this study was mainly focused on the healthcare providers as the major key players that can be targeted with policies aimed at controlling healthcare-acquired infection in many healthcare facilities. References Batran, A., Ayed, A., Salameh, B., Ayoub, M., & Fasfous, A. (2018). Are standard precautions for hospital-acquired infection among nurses in the public sector satisfactory? AMHS , 6 (2), 223-227. Desta, M., Ayenew, T., Sitotaw, N., Tegegne, N., Dires, M., & Getie, M. (2018). Knowledge, practice and associated factors of infection prevention among healthcare workers in Debre Markos referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res, 18, 465. Haque, M., Sartelli, M., McKimm, J., & Bakar, A. M. (2018). Healthcare-associated infections – an overview. Infection Drug Resist, 11, 2321-2333. Imad, F., Ayed, A., Faeda, E., & Lubna, H. (2015). Knowledge and Practice of Nursing Staff towards Infection Control Measures in the Palestinian Hospitals. ERIC, 6 (4), 79-90. Jahangir, M., Ali, M., & Riaz, M. S. (2017). Knowledge and Practices of Nurses Regarding Spread of Nosocomial Infection In government Hospitals, Lahore. J Liaquat Uni Med Health Sci, 16 (3), 149-153. Moyo, G. (2013). Factors influencing compliance with infection prevention standard precautions among nurses working at Mbagathi district hospital, Nairobi, Kenya. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi. Stone, P. (2017). Economic burden of healthcare-associated infections: an American perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon
  • 28. Outcomes Res, 9 (5), 417-422. Teshager, A. F., Engeda, H. E., & Worku, W. Z. (2015). Knowledge, Practice, and Associated Factors towards Prevention of Surgical Site Infection among Nurses Working in Amhara Regional State Referral Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia. Surgery Research and Practice. Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsNRS-434VNNRS-434VN-O505Developmental Assessment and the School-Aged Child100.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Comparison of Physical Assessment Among School-Aged Children25.0%A comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is omitted.An incomplete comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is summarized. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is omitted or contains significant inaccuracies.A general comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is summarized. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is generally described. More information or support is needed for clarity or accuracy.A comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is presented. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age
  • 29. and developmental stage of the child is described. Some information is needed for clarity.A detailed comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is presented. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is thoroughly described. Insight is demonstrated into the physical assessment of school age children.Typical Assessment for a Child of a Specific Age25.0%The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is not described. The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is summarized. The summary contains significant inaccuracies for the age of the child. The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is generally described. The description contains some inaccuracies for the age of the child.The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is described. The overall description is accurate. Some information is needed for clarity.The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is accurately and thoroughly described. Developmental Assessment of a Child Using a Developmental Theory (Erickson, Piaget, Kohlberg)30.0%A child assessment based on a developmental theory is omitted.A child assessment based on a developmental theory is partially summarized. Partial strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are omitted or are incorrect. There are significant inaccuracies.A child assessment based on a developmental theory is generally described. General strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are summarized. There are minor inaccuracies.A child assessment based on a developmental theory is described. Appropriate strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are described. Some information
  • 30. is needed for clarity.A child assessment based on a developmental theory is thoroughly described. Well-developed strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are all accurate and described in detail.Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%Thesis Development and Purpose5.0%Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic and Construction5.0%Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0%Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or
  • 31. typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Format 5.0%Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)2.0%Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct. Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)3.0%Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.Total Weightage100% 1 The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing March 21, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • 32. Introduction 3 Master’s Education in Nursing and Areas of Practice 5 Context for Nursing Practice 6 Master’s Nursing Education Curriculum 7 The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing I. Background for Practice from Sciences and Humanities 9 II. Organizational and Systems Leadership 11 III. Quality Improvement and Safety 13 IV. Translating and Integrating Scholarship into Practice 15 V. Informatics and Healthcare Technologies 17 VI. Health Policy and Advocacy 20 VII. Interprofessional Collaboration for Improving Patient and Population Health Outcomes 22 VIII. Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving Health 24 IX. Master’s-Level Nursing Practice 26 Clinical/Practice Learning Expectations for Master’s Programs
  • 33. 29 Summary 31 Glossary 31 2 References 40 Appendix A: Task Force on the Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing 49 Appendix B: Participants who attended Stakeholder Meetings 50 Appendix C: Schools of Nursing that Participated in the Regional Meetings or Provided Feedback 52 Appendix D: Professional Organizations that Participated in the Regional Meetings or Provided Feedback 63 Appendix E: Healthcare Systems that Participated in the Regional Meetings 64 3
  • 34. The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing March 21, 2011 The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing reflect the profession’s continuing call for imagination, transformative thinking, and evolutionary change in graduate education. The extraordinary explosion of knowledge, expanding technologies, increasing diversity, and global health challenges produce a dynamic environment for nursing and amplify nursing’s critical contributions to health care. Master’s education prepares nurses for flexible leadership and critical action within complex, changing systems, including health, educational, and organizational systems. Master’s education equips nurses with valuable knowledge and skills to lead change, promote health, and elevate care in various roles and settings. Synergy with these Essentials, current and future healthcare reform legislation, and the action-oriented recommendations of the Initiative on the Future of Nursing (IOM, 2010) highlights the value and transforming potential of the nursing profession. These Essentials are core for all master’s programs in nursing and provide the necessary curricular elements and framework, regardless of focus, major, or intended practice setting. These Essentials delineate the outcomes expected of all graduates of master’s nursing programs. These Essentials are not prescriptive directives on the design of programs. Consistent with the Baccalaureate and Doctorate of Nursing Practice Essentials, this
  • 35. document does not address preparation for specific roles, which may change and emerge over time. These Essentials also provide guidance for master’s programs during a time when preparation for specialty advanced nursing practice is transitioning to the doctoral level. Master’s education remains a critical component of the nursing education trajectory to prepare nurses who can address the gaps resulting from growing healthcare needs. Nurses who obtain the competencies outlined in these Essentials have significant value for current and emerging roles in healthcare delivery and design through advanced nursing knowledge and higher level leadership skills for improving health outcomes. For some nurses, master’s education equips them with a fulfilling lifetime expression of their mastery area. For others, this core is a graduate foundation for doctoral education. Each preparation is valued. Introduction The dynamic nature of the healthcare delivery system underscores the need for the nursing profession to look to the future and anticipate the healthcare needs for which nurses must be prepared to address. The complexities of health and nursing care today make expanded nursing knowledge a necessity in contemporary care settings. The transformation of health care and nursing practice requires a new conceptualization of master’s education. Master’s education must prepare the
  • 36. graduate to: • Lead change to improve quality outcomes, 4 • Advance a culture of excellence through lifelong learning, • Build and lead collaborative interprofessional care teams, • Navigate and integrate care services across the healthcare system, • Design innovative nursing practices, and • Translate evidence into practice. Graduates of master’s degree programs in nursing are prepared with broad knowledge and practice expertise that builds and expands on baccalaureate or entry-level nursing practice. This preparation provides graduates with a fuller understanding of the discipline of nursing in order to engage in higher level practice and leadership in a variety of settings and commit to lifelong learning. For those nurses seeking a terminal degree, the highest level of preparation within the discipline, the new conceptualization for master’s education will allow for seamless movement into a research or practice-focused doctoral program (AACN, 2006, 2010).
  • 37. The nine Essentials addressed in this document delineate the knowledge and skills that all nurses prepared in master’s nursing programs acquire. These Essentials guide the preparation of graduates for diverse areas of practice in any healthcare setting. • Essential I: Background for Practice from Sciences and Humanities o Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse integrates scientific findings from nursing, biopsychosocial fields, genetics, public health, quality improvement, and organizational sciences for the continual improvement of nursing care across diverse settings. • Essential II: Organizational and Systems Leadership o Recognizes that organizational and systems leadership are critical to the promotion of high quality and safe patient care. Leadership skills are needed that emphasize ethical and critical decision making, effective working relationships, and a systems-perspective. • Essential III: Quality Improvement and Safety o Recognizes that a master’s-prepared nurse must be articulate in the methods, tools, performance measures, and standards related to quality, as well as prepared to apply quality principles within an organization.
  • 38. • Essential IV: Translating and Integrating Scholarship into Practice o Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse applies research outcomes within the practice setting, resolves practice problems, works as a change agent, and disseminates results. • Essential V: Informatics and Healthcare Technologies 5 o Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse uses patient-care technologies to deliver and enhance care and uses communication technologies to integrate and coordinate care. • Essential VI: Health Policy and Advocacy o Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse is able to intervene at the system level through the policy development process and to employ advocacy strategies to influence health and health care. • Essential VII: Interprofessional Collaboration for Improving Patient and Population Health Outcomes o Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse, as a member and
  • 39. leader of interprofessional teams, communicates, collaborates, and consults with other health professionals to manage and coordinate care. • Essential VIII: Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving Health o Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse applies and integrates broad, organizational, client-centered, and culturally appropriate concepts in the planning, delivery, management, and evaluation of evidence- based clinical prevention and population care and services to individuals, families, and aggregates/identified populations. • Essential IX: Master’s-Level Nursing Practice o Recognizes that nursing practice, at the master’s level, is broadly defined as any form of nursing intervention that influences healthcare outcomes for individuals, populations, or systems. Master’s-level nursing graduates must have an advanced level of understanding of nursing and relevant sciences as well as the ability to integrate this knowledge into practice. . Nursing practice interventions include both direct and indirect care components.
  • 40. Master’s Education in Nursing and Areas of Practice Graduates with a master’s degree in nursing are prepared for a variety of roles and areas of practice. Graduates may pursue new and innovative roles that result from health reform and changes in an evolving and global healthcare system. Some graduates will pursue direct care practice roles in a variety of settings (e.g., the Clinical Nurse Leader, nurse educator). Others may choose indirect care roles or areas of practice that focus on aggregate, systems, or have an organizational focus, (e.g. nursing or health program management, informatics, public health, or clinical research coordinator). In addition to developing competence in the nine Essential core areas delineated in this document, each graduate will have additional coursework in an area of practice or functional role. This coursework may include more in-depth preparation and competence in one or two of the Essentials or in an additional/ supplementary area of practice. For example, more concentrated coursework or further development of the knowledge and skills embedded in Essential IV (Translational Scholarship for Evidence-Based Practice) will prepare the nurse to manage research projects for nurse scientists and other 6 healthcare researchers working in multi-professional research
  • 41. teams. More in-depth preparation in Essential II (Organizational and System Leadership) will provide knowledge useful for nursing management roles. In some instances, graduates of master’s in nursing programs will seek to fill roles as educators. As outlined in Essential IX, all master’s-prepared nurses will develop competence in applying teaching/learning principles in work with patients and/or students across the continuum of care in a variety of settings. However, as recommended in the Carnegie Foundation report (2009), Educating Nurses: A Call for Radical Transformation, those individuals, as do all master’s graduates, who choose a nurse educator role require preparation across all nine Essential areas, including graduate-level clinical practice content and experiences. In addition, a program preparing individuals for a nurse educator role should include preparation in curriculum design and development, teaching methodologies, educational needs assessment, and learner-centered theories and methods. Master’s prepared nurses may teach patients and their families and/or student nurses, staff nurses, and variety of direct-care providers. The master’s prepared nurse educator differs from the BSN nurse in depth of his/her understanding of the nursing discipline, nursing practice, and the added pedagogical skills. To teach students, patients, and caregivers regarding health promotion, disease prevention, or disease management, the master’s-prepared nurse educator builds on baccalaureate
  • 42. knowledge with graduate- level content in the areas of health assessment, physiology/pathophysiology, and pharmacology to strengthen his/her scientific background and facilitate his/her understanding of nursing and health-related information. Those master’s students who aspire to faculty roles in baccalaureate and higher degree programs will be advised that additional education at the doctoral level is needed (AACN, 2008). Context for Nursing Practice Health care in the United States and globally is changing dramatically. Interest in evolving health care has prompted greater focus on health promotion and illness prevention, along with cost-effective approaches to high acuity, chronic disease management, care coordination, and long-term care. Public concerns about cost of health care, fiscal sustainability, healthcare quality, and development of sustainable solutions to healthcare problems are driving reform efforts. Attention to affordability and accessibility of health care, maintaining healthy environments, and promoting personal and community responsibility for health is growing among the public and policy makers. In addition to broad public mandates for a reformed and responsive healthcare system, a number of groups are calling for changes in the ways all health professionals are educated
  • 43. to meet current and projected needs for contemporary care delivery. The Institute of 7 Medicine (IOM), an interprofessional healthcare panel, described a set of core competencies that all health professionals regardless of discipline will demonstrate: 1) the provision of patient-centered care, 2) working in interprofessional teams, 3) employing evidence-based practice, 4) applying quality improvement approaches, and 5) utilizing informatics (IOM, 2003). Given the ongoing public trust in nursing (Gallup, 2010), and the desire for fundamental reorganization of relationships among individuals, the public, healthcare organizations and healthcare professionals, graduate education for nurses is needed that is wide in scope and breadth, emphasizes all systems-level care and includes mastery of practice knowledge and skills. Such preparation reflects mastery of higher level thinking and conceptualization skills than at the baccalaureate level, as well as an understanding of the interrelationships among practice, ethical, and legal issues; financial concerns and comparative effectiveness; and interprofessional teamwork. Master’s Nursing Education Curriculum
  • 44. The master’s nursing curriculum is conceptualized in Figure 1 and includes three components: 1. Graduate Nursing Core: foundational curriculum content deemed essential for all students who pursue a master’s degree in nursing regardless of the functional focus. 2. Direct Care Core: essential content to provide direct patient services at an advanced level. 3. Functional Area Content: those clinical and didactic learning experiences identified and defined by the professional nursing organizations and certification bodies for specific nursing roles or functions. This document delineates the graduate nursing core competencies for all master’s graduates. These core outcomes reflect the many changes in the healthcare system occurring over the past decade. In addition, these expected outcomes for all master’s degree graduates reflect the increasing responsibility of nursing in addressing many of the gaps in health care as well as growing patient and population needs. Master’s nursing education, as is all nursing education, is evolving to meet these needs and to prepare nurses to assume increasing accountabilities, responsibilities, and
  • 45. leadership positions. As master’s nursing education is re- envisioned and preparation of individuals for advanced specialty nursing practice transitions to the practice doctorate these Essentials delineate the foundational, core expectations for these master’s program graduates until the transition is completed. 8 Figure 1: Model of Master’s Nursing Curriculum * All master’s degree programs that prepare graduates for roles that have a component of direct care practice are required to have graduate level content/coursework in the following three areas: physiology/pathophysiology, health assessment, and pharmacology. However, graduates being prepared for any one of the four APRN roles
  • 46. (CRNA, CNM, CNS, or CNP), must complete three separate comprehensive, graduate level courses that meet the criteria delineated in the 2008 Consensus Model for APRN Licensure, Accreditation, Certification and Education. (http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education/pdf/APRNReport.pdf). In addition, the expected outcomes for each of these three APRN core courses are delineated in The Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice (pg. 23-24) (http://www.aacn.nche.edu/DNP/pdf/Essentials.pdf). + The nursing educator is a direct care role and therefore requires graduate-level content in the three Direct Care Core courses. All graduates of a master’s nursing program must have supervised practice experiences that are sufficient to demonstrate mastery of the Essentials. The term “supervised” is used broadly and can include precepted experiences with faculty site visits. These learning experiences may be accomplished through diverse teaching methods, including face-to-face or simulated methods. In addition, development of clinical proficiency is facilitated through the use of focused and sustained clinical experiences designed to strengthen patient care delivery skills, as 9 well as system assessment and intervention skills, which will lead to an enhanced understanding of organizational dynamics. These immersion
  • 47. experiences afford the student an opportunity to focus on a population of interest or may focus on a specific role. Most often, the immersion experience occurs toward the end of the program as a culminating synthesis experience. The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing Essential I: Background for Practice from Sciences and Humanities Rationale Master’s-prepared nurses build on the competencies gained in a baccalaureate nursing program by developing a deeper understanding of nursing and the related sciences needed to fully analyze, design, implement, and evaluate nursing care. These nurses are well prepared to provide care to diverse populations and cohorts of patients in clinical and community-based systems. The master’s-prepared nurse integrates findings from the sciences and the humanities, biopsychosocial fields, genetics, public health, quality improvement, health economics, translational science, and organizational sciences for the continual improvement of nursing care at the unit, clinic, home, or program level. Master’s-prepared nursing care reflects a more sophisticated understanding of assessment, problem identification, design of interventions, and evaluation of aggregate outcomes than baccalaureate-prepared nursing care.
  • 48. Students being prepared for direct care roles will have graduate- level content that builds upon an undergraduate foundation in health assessment, pharmacology, and pathophysiology. Having master’s-prepared graduates with a strong background in these three areas is seen as imperative from the practice perspective. It is recommended that the master’s curriculum preparing individuals for direct care roles include three separate graduate-level courses in these three content areas. In addition, the inclusion of these three separate courses facilitates the transition of these master’s program graduates into the DNP advanced-practice registered-nurse programs. Master’s-prepared nurses understand the intersection between systems science and organizational science in order to serve as integrators within and across systems of care. Care coordination is based on systems science (Nelson et al., 2008). Care management incorporates an understanding of the clinical and community context, and the research relevant to the needs of the population. Nurses at this level use advanced clinical reasoning for ambiguous and uncertain clinical presentations, and incorporate concerns of family, significant others, and communities into the design and delivery of care. Master’s-prepared nurses use a variety of theories and frameworks, including nursing and ethical theories in the analysis of clinical problems, illness prevention, and health promotion strategies. Knowledge from information sciences,
  • 49. health communication, and health literacy are used to provide care to multiple populations. These nurses are able to 10 address complex cultural issues and design care that responds to the needs of multiple populations, who may have potentially conflicting cultural needs and preferences. As healthcare technology becomes more sophisticated and its use more widespread, master’s-prepared nurse are able to evaluate when its use is appropriate for diagnostic, educational, and therapeutic interventions. Master’s-prepared nurses use improvement science and quality processes to evaluate outcomes of the aggregate of patients, community members, or communities under their care, monitor trends in clinical data, and understand the implications of trends for changing nursing care. The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to: 1. Integrate nursing and related sciences into the delivery of advanced nursing care to diverse populations. 2. Incorporate current and emerging genetic/genomic evidence in providing advanced nursing care to individuals, families, and communities while accounting for patient values and clinical judgment.
  • 50. 3. Design nursing care for a clinical or community-focused population based on biopsychosocial, public health, nursing, and organizational sciences. 4. Apply ethical analysis and clinical reasoning to assess, intervene, and evaluate advanced nursing care delivery. 5. Synthesize evidence for practice to determine appropriate application of interventions across diverse populations. 6. Use quality processes and improvement science to evaluate care and ensure patient safety for individuals and communities. 7. Integrate organizational science and informatics to make changes in the care environment to improve health outcomes. 8. Analyze nursing history to expand thinking and provide a sense of professional heritage and identity. Sample Content • Healthcare economics and finance models • Advanced nursing science, including the major streams of nursing scientific development • Scientific bases of illness prevention, health promotion, and wellness
  • 51. • Genetics, genomics, and pharmacogenomics • Public health science, such as basic epidemiology, surveillance, environmental science, and population health analysis and program planning • Organizational sciences 11 • Systems science and integration, including microsystems, mesosystems, and macro- level systems • Chaos theory and complexity science • Leadership science • Theories of bioethics • Information science • Quality processes and improvement science • Technology assessment • Nursing Theories Essential II: Organizational and Systems Leadership Rationale Organizational and systems leadership are critical to the promotion of high quality and safe patient care. Leadership skills are needed that emphasize ethical and critical decision making. The master’s-prepared nurse’s knowledge and skills in these areas are consistent with nursing and healthcare goals to eliminate health disparities and to promote
  • 52. excellence in practice. Master’s-level practice includes not only direct care but also a focus on the systems that provide care and serve the needs of a panel of patients, a defined population, or community. To be effective, graduates must be able to demonstrate leadership by initiating and maintaining effective working relationships using mutually respectful communication and collaboration within interprofessional teams, demonstrating skills in care coordination, delegation, and initiating conflict resolution strategies. The master’s- prepared nurse provides and coordinates comprehensive care for patients–individuals, families, groups, and communities–in multiple and varied settings. Using information from numerous sources, these nurses navigate the patient through the healthcare system and assume accountability for quality outcomes. Skills essential to leadership include communication, collaboration, negotiation, delegation, and coordination. Master’s-prepared nurses are members and leaders of healthcare teams that deliver a variety of services. These graduates bring a unique blend of knowledge, judgment, skills, and caring to the team. As a leader and partner with other health professionals, these nurses seek collaboration and consultation with other providers as necessary in the design, coordination, and evaluation of patient care outcomes. In an environment with ongoing changes in the organization and
  • 53. financing of health care, it is imperative that all master’s-prepared nurses have a keen understanding of healthcare policy, organization, and financing. The purpose of this content is to prepare a graduate to provide quality cost-effective care; to participate in the implementation of care; and to 12 assume a leadership role in the management of human, fiscal, and physical healthcare resources. Program graduates understand the economies of care, business principles, and how to work within and affect change in systems. The master’s-prepared nurse must be able to analyze the impact of systems on patient outcomes, including analyzing error rates. These nurses will be prepared with knowledge and expertise in assessing organizations, identifying systems’ issues, and facilitating organization-wide changes in practice delivery. Master’s- prepared nurses must be able to use effective interdisciplinary communication skills to work across departments identifying opportunities and designing and testing systems and programs to improve care. In addition, nurse practice at this level requires an understanding of complexity theory and systems thinking, as well as the business and financial acumen needed for the analysis of practice quality and costs.
  • 54. The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to: 1. Apply leadership skills and decision making in the provision of culturally responsive, high-quality nursing care, healthcare team coordination, and the oversight and accountability for care delivery and outcomes. 2. Assume a leadership role in effectively implementing patient safety and quality improvement initiatives within the context of the interprofessional team using effective communication (scholarly writing, speaking, and group interaction) skills. 3. Develop an understanding of how healthcare delivery systems are organized and financed (and how this affects patient care) and identify the economic, legal, and political factors that influence health care. 4. Demonstrate the ability to use complexity science and systems theory in the design, delivery, and evaluation of health care. 5. Apply business and economic principles and practices, including budgeting, cost/benefit analysis, and marketing, to develop a business plan. 6. Design and implement systems change strategies that improve the care environment. 7. Participate in the design and implementation of new models of care delivery and coordination.
  • 55. 13 Sample Content • Leadership, including theory, leadership styles, contemporary approaches, and strategies (organizing, managing, delegating, supervising, collaborating, coordinating) • Data-driven decision-making based on an ethical framework to promote culturally responsive, quality patient care in a variety of settings, including creative and imaginative strategies in problem solving • Communication–both interpersonal and organizational– including elements and channels, models, and barriers • Conflict, including conflict resolution, mediation, negotiation, and managing conflict • Change theory and social change theories • Systems theory and complexity science • Healthcare systems and organizational relationships (e.g., finance, organizational structure, and delivery of care, including mission/vision/philosophy and values) • Healthcare finance, including budgeting, cost/benefit analysis, variance analysis, and marketing • Operations research (e.g., queuing theory, supply chain management, and systems designs in health care)
  • 56. • Teams and teamwork, including team leadership, building effective teams, and nurturing teams Essential III: Quality Improvement and Safety Rationale Continuous quality improvement involves every level of the healthcare organization. A master’s-prepared nurse must be articulate in the methods, tools, performance measures, culture of safety principles, and standards related to quality, as well as prepared to apply quality principles within an organization to be an effective leader and change agent. The Institute of Medicine report (1998) To Err is Human defined patient safety as “freedom from accidental injury” and stated that patients should not be at greater risk for accidental injury in a hospital or healthcare setting than they are in their own home. Improvement in patient safety along with reducing and ultimately eliminating harm to patients is fundamental to quality care. Skills are needed that assist in identifying actual or potential failures in processes and systems that lead to breakdowns and errors and then redesigning processes to make patients safe. Knowledge and skills in human factors and basic safety design principles that affect unsafe practices are essential. Graduates of master’s-level programs must be able to
  • 57. analyze systems and work to create a just culture of safety in which personnel feel comfortable disclosing errors—including their own—while maintaining professional 14 accountability. Learning how to evaluate, calculate, and improve the overall reliability of processes are core skills needed by master’s-prepared nurses. Knowledge of both the potential and the actual impact of national patient safety resources, initiatives, and regulations and the use of national benchmarks are required. Changes in healthcare reimbursement with the introduction of Medicare’s list of “never events” and the regulatory push for more transparency on quality outcomes require graduates to be able to determine if the outcomes of standards of practice, performance, and competence have been met and maintained. The master’s-prepared nurse provides leadership across the care continuum in diverse settings using knowledge regarding high reliability organizations. These organizations achieve consistently safe and effective performance records despite unpredictable operating environments or intrinsically hazardous endeavors (Weick, 2001). The master’s-prepared nurse will be able to monitor, analyze, and prioritize outcomes that need to be improved. Using quality improvement and high
  • 58. reliability organizational principles, these nurses will be able to quantify the impact of plans of action. The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to: 1. Analyze information about quality initiatives recognizing the contributions of individuals and inter-professional healthcare teams to improve health outcomes across the continuum of care. 2. Implement evidence-based plans based on trend analysis and quantify the impact on quality and safety. 3. Analyze information and design systems to sustain improvements and promote transparency using high reliability and just culture principles. 4. Compare and contrast several appropriate quality improvement models. 5. Promote a professional environment that includes accountability and high-level communication skills when involved in peer review, advocacy for patients and families, reporting of errors, and professional writing. 6. Contribute to the integration of healthcare services within systems to affect safety and quality of care to improve patient outcomes and reduce fragmentation of care. 7. Direct quality improvement methods to promote culturally responsive, safe, timely,
  • 59. effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care. 8. Lead quality improvement initiatives that integrate socio- cultural factors affecting the delivery of nursing and healthcare services. 15 Sample Content • Quality improvement models differentiating structure, process, and outcome indicators • Principles of a just culture and relationship to analyzing errors • Quality improvement methods and tools: Brainstorming, Fishbone cause and effect diagram, flow chart, Plan, Do Study, Act (PDSA), Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA),Find, Organize, Clarify, Understand, Select-Plan, Do, Check, Act (FOCUS-PDCA), Six Sigma, Lean • High-Reliability Organizations (HROs) / High-reliability techniques • National patient safety goals and other relevant regulatory standards (e.g., CMS core measures, pay for performance indicators, and never events) • Nurse-sensitive indicators • Data management (e.g., collection tools, display techniques, data analysis, trend analysis, control charts) •Analysis of errors (e.g., Root Cause Analysis [RCA], Failure Mode Effects Analysis [FMEA], serious safety events) • Communication (e.g., hands-off communication, chain-of-
  • 60. command, error disclosure) • Participate in executive patient safety rounds • Simulation training in a variety of settings (e.g., disasters, codes, and other high-risk clinical areas) • RN fit for duty/impact of fatigue and distractions in care environment on patient safety Essential IV: Translating and Integrating Scholarship into Practice Rationale Professional nursing practice at all levels is grounded in the ethical translation of current evidence into practice. Fundamentally, nurses need a questioning/inquiring attitude toward their practice and the care environment. The master’s-prepared nurse examines policies and seeks evidence for every aspect of practice, thereby translating current evidence and identifying gaps where evidence is lacking. These nurses apply research outcomes within the practice setting, resolve practice problems (individually or as a member of the healthcare team), and disseminate results both within the setting and in wider venues in order to advance clinical practice. Changing practice locally, as well as more broadly, demands that the master’s-prepared nurse is skilled at challenging current practices, procedures, and policies. The emerging sciences referred to as implementation or improvement sciences are providing evidence
  • 61. about the processes that are effective when making needed changes where the change processes and context are themselves evidence based (Damschroder et al., 2009; Sobo, Bowman, & Gifford, 2008; van Achterberg, Schoonhoven, & Grol, 2008). Master’s- 16 prepared nurses, therefore, must be able to implement change deemed appropriate given context and outcome analysis, and to assist others in efforts to improve outcomes. Master’s-prepared nurses lead continuous improvement processes based on translational research skills. The cyclical processes in which these nurses are engaged includes identifying questions needing answers, searching or creating the evidence for potential solutions/innovations, evaluating the outcomes, and identifying additional questions. Master’s-prepared nurses, when appropriate, lead the healthcare team in the implementation of evidence-based practice. These nurses support staff in lifelong learning to improve care decisions, serving as a role model and mentor for evidence- based decision making. Program graduates must possess the skills necessary to bring evidence-based practice to both individual patients for whom they directly care and to those patients for whom they are indirectly responsible. Those
  • 62. skills include knowledge acquisition and dissemination, working in groups, and change management. The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to: 1. Integrate theory, evidence, clinical judgment, research, and interprofessional perspectives using translational processes to improve practice and associated health outcomes for patient aggregates. 2. Advocate for the ethical conduct of research and translational scholarship (with particular attention to the protection of the patient as a research participant). 3. Articulate to a variety of audiences the evidence base for practice decisions, including the credibility of sources of information and the relevance to the practice problem confronted. 4. Participate, leading when appropriate, in collaborative teams to improve care outcomes and support policy changes through knowledge generation, knowledge dissemination, and planning and evaluating knowledge implementation. 5. Apply practice guidelines to improve practice and the care environment. 6. Perform rigorous critique of evidence derived from databases to generate meaningful evidence for nursing practice.
  • 63. Sample Content: • Research process • Implementation/Improvement science • Evidence-based practice: 17 � Clinical decision making � Critical thinking � Problem identification � Outcome measurement • Translational science: � Data collection in nursing practice � Design of databases that generate meaningful evidence for nursing practice � Data analysis in practice � Evidence-based interventions � Prediction and analysis of outcomes � Patterns of behavior and outcomes � Gaps in evidence for practice � Importance of cultural relevance • Scholarship: � Application of research to the clinical setting � Resolution of clinical problems � Appreciative inquiry � Dissemination of results • Advocacy in research • Research ethics
  • 64. • Knowledge acquisition • Group process • Management of change • Evidence-based policy development in practice • Quality improvement models/methodologies • Safety issues in practice • Innovation processes Essential V: Informatics and Healthcare Technologies Rationale Informatics and healthcare technologies encompass five broad areas: • Use of patient care and other technologies to deliver and enhance care; • Communication technologies to integrate and coordinate care; • Data management to analyze and improve outcomes of care; • Health information management for evidence-based care and health education; and 18 • Facilitation and use of electronic health records to improve patient care. Knowledge and skills in each of these four broad areas is essential for all master’s-
  • 65. prepared nurses. The extent and focus of each will vary depending upon the nurse’s role, setting, and practice focus. Knowledge and skills in information and healthcare technology are critical to the delivery of quality patient care in a variety of settings (IOM, 2003a). The use of technologies to deliver, enhance, and document care is changing rapidly. In addition, information technology systems, including decision-support systems, are essential to gathering evidence to impact practice. Improvement in cost effectiveness and safety depend on evidence-based practice, outcomes research, interprofessional care coordination, and electronic health records, all of which involve information management and technology (McNeil et al., 2006). As nursing and healthcare practices evolve to better meet patient needs, the application of these technologies will change as well. As the use of technology expands, the master’s-prepared nurse must have the knowledge and skills to use current technologies to deliver and coordinate care across multiple settings, analyze point of care outcomes, and communicate with individuals and groups, including the media, policymakers, other healthcare professionals, and the public. Integral to these skills is an attitude of openness to innovation and continual learning, as information systems and care technologies are constantly changing, including their use at the point of care.
  • 66. Graduates of master’s-level nursing programs will have competence to determine the appropriate use of technologies and integrate current and emerging technologies into one’s practice and the practice of others to enhance care outcomes. In addition, the master’s-prepared nurse will be able to educate other health professionals, staff, patients, and caregivers using current technologies and about the principles related to the safe and effective use of care and information technologies. Graduates ethically manage data, information, knowledge, and technology to communicate effectively with healthcare team, patients, and caregivers to integrate safe and effective care within and across settings. Master’s-prepared nurses use research and clinical evidence to inform practice decisions. Master’s-degree graduates are prepared to gather, document, and analyze outcome data that serve as a foundation for decision making and the implementation of interventions or strategies to improve care outcomes. The master’s-prepared nurse uses statistical and epidemiological principles to synthesize these data, information, and knowledge to evaluate and achieve optimal health outcomes. The usefulness of electronic health records and other health information management systems to evaluate care outcomes is improved by standardized terminologies. Integration
  • 67. 19 of standardized terminologies in information systems supports day-to-day nursing practice and also the capacity to enhance interprofessional communication and generate standardized data to continuously evaluate and improve practice (American Nurses Association, 2008). Master’s-prepared nurses use information and communication technologies to provide guidance and oversight for the development and implementation of health education programs, evidence-based policies, and point-of-care practices by members of the interdisciplinary care team. Health information is growing exponentially. Health literacy is a powerful tool in health promotion, disease prevention, management of chronic illnesses, and quality of life–all of which are hallmarks of excellence in nursing practice. Master’s- prepared nurses serve as information managers, patient advocates, and educators by assisting others(including patients, students, caregivers and healthcare professionals) in accessing, understanding, evaluating, and applying health-related information. The master’s-prepared nurse designs and implements education programs for cohorts of patients or other healthcare providers using information and communication technologies. The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to: 1. Analyze current and emerging technologies to support safe
  • 68. practice environments, and to optimize patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and health outcomes. 2. Evaluate outcome data using current communication technologies, information systems, and statistical principles to develop strategies to reduce risks and improve health outcomes. 3. Promote policies that incorporate ethical principles and standards for the use of health and information technologies. 4. Provide oversight and guidance in the integration of technologies to document patient care and improve patient outcomes. 5. Use information and communication technologies, resources, and principles of learning to teach patients and others. 6. Use current and emerging technologies in the care environment to support lifelong learning for self and others. Sample Content • Use of technology, information management systems, and standardized terminology 20
  • 69. • Use of standardized terminologies to document and analyze nursing care outcomes • Bio-health informatics • Regulatory requirements for electronic data monitoring systems • Ethical and legal issues related to the use of information technology, including copyright, privacy, and confidentiality issues • Retrieval information systems, including access, evaluation of data, and application of relevant data to patient care • Statistical principles and analyses of outcome data • Online review and resources for evidence-based practice • Use and implementation of technology for virtual care delivery and monitoring • Electronic health record, including policies related to the implementation of and use to impact care outcomes • Complementary roles of the master’s-prepared nursing and information technology professionals, including nurse informaticist and quality officer • Use of technology to analyze data sets and their use to evaluate patient care outcomes • Effective use of educational/instructional technology • Point-of-care information systems and decision support systems
  • 70. Essential VI: Health Policy and Advocacy Rationale The healthcare environment is ever-evolving and influenced by technological, economic, political, and sociocultural factors locally and globally. Graduates of master’s degree nursing programs have requisite knowledge and skills to promote health, help shape the health delivery system, and advance values like social justice through policy processes and advocacy. Nursing’s call to political activism and policy advocacy emerges from many different viewpoints. As more evidence links the broad psychosocial, economic, and cultural factors to health status, nurses are compelled to incorporate these factors into their approach to care. Most often, policy processes and system- level strategies yield the strongest influence on these broad determinants of health. Being accountable for improving the quality of healthcare delivery, nurses must understand the legal and political determinants of the system and have the requisite skills to partner for an improved system. Nurses’ involvement in policy debates brings our professional values to bear on the process (Warner, 2003). Master’s-prepared nurses will use their political efficacy and competence to improve the health outcomes of populations and improve the quality of the healthcare delivery system.
  • 71. 21 Policy shapes healthcare systems, influences social determinants of health, and therefore determines accessibility, accountability, and affordability of health care. Health policy creates conditions that promote or impede equity in access to care and health outcomes. Implementing strategies that address health disparities serves as a prelude to influencing policy formation. In order to influence policy, the master’s- prepared nurse needs to work within and affect change in systems. To effectively collaborate with stakeholders, the master’s-prepared nurse must understand the fiscal context in which they are practicing and make the linkages among policy, financing, and access to quality health care. The graduate must understand the principles of healthcare economics, finance, payment methods, and the relationships between policy and health economics. Advocacy for patients, the profession, and health-promoting policies is operationalized in divergent ways. Attributes of advocacy include safeguarding autonomy, promoting social justice, using ethical principles, and empowering self and others (Grace, 2001; Hanks, 2007; Xiaoyan & Jezewski, 2006). Giving voice and persuasion to needs and preferred direction at the individual, institution, state, or federal policy level is integral for the
  • 72. master’s-prepared nurse. The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to: 1. Analyze how policies influence the structure and financing of health care, practice, and health outcomes. 2. Participate in the development and implementation of institutional, local, and state and federal policy. 3. Examine the effect of legal and regulatory processes on nursing practice, healthcare delivery, and outcomes. 4. Interpret research, bringing the nursing perspective, for policy makers and stakeholders. 5. Advocate for policies that improve the health of the public and the profession of nursing. Sample Content • Policy process: development, implementation, and evaluation • Structure of healthcare delivery systems • Theories and models of policy making • Policy making environments: values, economies, politics,
  • 73. social • Policy-making process at various levels of government • Ethical and value-based frameworks guiding policy making 22 • General principles of microeconomics and macroeconomics, accounting, and marketing strategies. • Globalization and global health • Interaction between regulatory processes and quality control • Health disparities • Social justice • Political activism • Economics of health care Essential VII: Interprofessional Collaboration for Improving Patient and Population Health Outcomes Rationale In a redesigned health system a greater emphasis will be placed on cooperation, communication, and collaboration among all health professionals in order to integrate care in teams and ensure that care is continuous and reliable. Therefore, an expert panel at the Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified working in interdisciplinary teams as one of the five core competencies for all health professionals (IOM,
  • 74. 2003). Interprofessional collaboration is critical for achieving clinical prevention and health promotion goals in order to improve patient and population health outcomes (APTR, 2008; 2009). Interprofessional practice is critical for improving patient care outcomes and, therefore, a key component of health professional education and lifelong learning (American Association of Colleges of Nursing & the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2010). The IOM also recognized the need for care providers to demonstrate a greater awareness to “patient values, preferences, and cultural values,” consistent with the Healthy People 2010 goal of achieving health equity through interprofessional approaches (USHHS, 2000). In this context, knowledge of broad determinants of health will enable the master’s graduate to succeed as a patient advocate, cultural and systems broker, and to lead and coordinate interprofessional teams across care environments in order to reduce barriers, facilitate access to care, and improve health outcomes. Successfully leading these teams is achieved through skill development and demonstrating effective communication, planning, and implementation of care directly with other healthcare professionals (AACN, 2007). Improving patient and population health outcomes is contingent on both horizontal and
  • 75. vertical health delivery systems that integrate research and clinical expertise to provide patient-centered care. Inherently the systems must include patients’ expressed values, needs, and preferences for shared decision making and management of their care. As 23 members and leaders of interprofessional teams, the master’s- prepared nurse will actively communicate, collaborate, and consult with other health professionals to manage and coordinate care across systems. The master’s-degree program prepares the graduate to: 1. Advocate for the value and role of the professional nurse as member and leader of interprofessional healthcare teams. 2. Understand other health professions’ scopes of practice to maximize contributions within the healthcare team. 3. Employ collaborative strategies in the design, coordination, and evaluation of patient-centered care. 4. Use effective communication strategies to develop,
  • 76. participate, and lead interprofessional teams and partnerships. 5. Mentor and coach new and experienced nurses and other members of the healthcare team. 6. Functions as an effective group leader or member based on an in-depth understanding of team dynamics and group processes. Sample Content • Scopes of practice for nursing and other professions • Differing world views among healthcare team members • Concepts of communication, collaboration, and coordination • Conflict management strategies and principles of negotiation • Organizational processes to enhance communication • Types of teams and team roles • Stages of team development • Diversity of teams • Cultural diversity • Patient-centered care • Change theories • Multiple-intelligence theory • Group dynamics • Power structures • Health-work environments