The document discusses various literary devices used in writing including figurative language, sentence structure, word choice, and style. It provides examples of different types of figurative language such as simile, metaphor, alliteration, repetition, onomatopoeia, and personification. It also discusses the use of rhetorical questions, capital letters, sentence length and structure, punctuation including colons and dashes, parentheses, quotation marks, and minor sentences which omit verbs. The document aims to help readers appreciate the craft of writing and analyze how authors use these devices effectively.
The document provides information about critical reading and various reading strategies. It discusses that critical reading is an active way of reading that involves analyzing, interpreting, and sometimes evaluating a text. It also discusses questioning both the text and one's own reading. The document then outlines strategies for critical reading such as preparing to read with an open mind, considering the title, reading slowly, and making notes. It also discusses multiple intelligence theory and outlines various types of intelligence such as linguistic, kinesthetic, visual, interpersonal, and intrapersonal. Finally, the document discusses different types of reading such as scanning, skimming, focus reading, and the SQ3R reading strategy.
This document discusses how to evaluate arguments. To evaluate an argument, you first analyze it by identifying the claim, or conclusion, the author is trying to persuade the reader of. You then identify the evidence or reasons the author provides to support the claim. Finally, you critically analyze the strength of the evidence and how well it actually supports the claim. A strong, valid argument will have evidence that is truthful and clearly supports its claim.
This document provides an overview of rhetorical analysis and its key components. It defines rhetoric as persuasive communication and examines an author's audience, purpose, genre, argument components like claims and evidence, and types of evidence. The document instructs readers to analyze how an argument is made through its rhetorical elements, not just the topic itself.
This document provides guidance on writing effective evaluation essays. It emphasizes the importance of:
1) Providing valid reasons for opinions that are based on shared criteria appropriate for the subject being evaluated.
2) Using counterarguments to engage readers and strengthen one's logic.
3) Finding common ground with readers to create a hook that keeps them interested.
4) Drawing on creativity in areas like subject choice and details to demonstrate care for readers.
The document discusses the structure and purpose of academic texts. It begins by outlining the common structures used, including IMRAD (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion). It then discusses key elements of each section, such as stating the aim and research questions in the introduction. It notes research questions should logically link to the aim but not be identical. The document also discusses identifying the overall structure of texts as argumentative, problem-solution, or report. It concludes by explaining the importance of understanding an author's purpose and perspective to identify possible bias.
This document discusses critical reading techniques. It defines critical reading as actively paying attention to the main idea, purpose, conclusions, and maintaining interest. Characteristics of critical readers include reading with a pencil, previewing material, asking questions, and re-reading difficult sections. Critical readers ask questions about the topic, purpose, organization, sources, and how their existing knowledge relates. Suggested techniques include previewing, annotating, summarizing reactions, and using supplemental resources to aid comprehension.
The document provides an overview of what defines a narrative essay and guidelines for writing one. A narrative essay relates a series of events in an organized way to make a point. It conveys action through details, dialogue, and description. It presents a conflict and creates tension as the story unfolds. The essay should have an introduction that sets up the conflict, a body that builds tension through events, and a conclusion that makes a final observation. When writing a narrative essay, students should gather key details of events and characters, develop a thesis, and revise the essay by analyzing its effectiveness.
The document discusses various literary devices used in writing including figurative language, sentence structure, word choice, and style. It provides examples of different types of figurative language such as simile, metaphor, alliteration, repetition, onomatopoeia, and personification. It also discusses the use of rhetorical questions, capital letters, sentence length and structure, punctuation including colons and dashes, parentheses, quotation marks, and minor sentences which omit verbs. The document aims to help readers appreciate the craft of writing and analyze how authors use these devices effectively.
The document provides information about critical reading and various reading strategies. It discusses that critical reading is an active way of reading that involves analyzing, interpreting, and sometimes evaluating a text. It also discusses questioning both the text and one's own reading. The document then outlines strategies for critical reading such as preparing to read with an open mind, considering the title, reading slowly, and making notes. It also discusses multiple intelligence theory and outlines various types of intelligence such as linguistic, kinesthetic, visual, interpersonal, and intrapersonal. Finally, the document discusses different types of reading such as scanning, skimming, focus reading, and the SQ3R reading strategy.
This document discusses how to evaluate arguments. To evaluate an argument, you first analyze it by identifying the claim, or conclusion, the author is trying to persuade the reader of. You then identify the evidence or reasons the author provides to support the claim. Finally, you critically analyze the strength of the evidence and how well it actually supports the claim. A strong, valid argument will have evidence that is truthful and clearly supports its claim.
This document provides an overview of rhetorical analysis and its key components. It defines rhetoric as persuasive communication and examines an author's audience, purpose, genre, argument components like claims and evidence, and types of evidence. The document instructs readers to analyze how an argument is made through its rhetorical elements, not just the topic itself.
This document provides guidance on writing effective evaluation essays. It emphasizes the importance of:
1) Providing valid reasons for opinions that are based on shared criteria appropriate for the subject being evaluated.
2) Using counterarguments to engage readers and strengthen one's logic.
3) Finding common ground with readers to create a hook that keeps them interested.
4) Drawing on creativity in areas like subject choice and details to demonstrate care for readers.
The document discusses the structure and purpose of academic texts. It begins by outlining the common structures used, including IMRAD (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion). It then discusses key elements of each section, such as stating the aim and research questions in the introduction. It notes research questions should logically link to the aim but not be identical. The document also discusses identifying the overall structure of texts as argumentative, problem-solution, or report. It concludes by explaining the importance of understanding an author's purpose and perspective to identify possible bias.
This document discusses critical reading techniques. It defines critical reading as actively paying attention to the main idea, purpose, conclusions, and maintaining interest. Characteristics of critical readers include reading with a pencil, previewing material, asking questions, and re-reading difficult sections. Critical readers ask questions about the topic, purpose, organization, sources, and how their existing knowledge relates. Suggested techniques include previewing, annotating, summarizing reactions, and using supplemental resources to aid comprehension.
The document provides an overview of what defines a narrative essay and guidelines for writing one. A narrative essay relates a series of events in an organized way to make a point. It conveys action through details, dialogue, and description. It presents a conflict and creates tension as the story unfolds. The essay should have an introduction that sets up the conflict, a body that builds tension through events, and a conclusion that makes a final observation. When writing a narrative essay, students should gather key details of events and characters, develop a thesis, and revise the essay by analyzing its effectiveness.
This document discusses the concept of diction in poetry. It begins with a quote about how poets craft words like artisans craft materials. It then defines diction as word choice and explains how words have both denotative and connotative meanings. Denotation is the dictionary definition, while connotation involves cultural associations. The document uses the example of "house" versus "home" to illustrate how words with similar denotations can have different connotations due to personal experience. It emphasizes that understanding connotation is key to understanding an author's intended effects and a reader's reactions.
The body paragraphs in an essay should develop the topic, prove points, and have a consistent pattern. A paragraph contains a topic sentence stating the main idea, supporting sentences with details and examples, and optionally a concluding sentence summarizing the key points. Topic sentences should be complete sentences that are neither too broad nor narrow in scope. Supporting sentences explain, prove, or expand on the topic sentence with facts, examples, statistics or quotations. A concluding sentence restates the main idea or summarizes the key points of the paragraph.
The document provides guidelines for writing a critique in 5 steps:
1) Thoroughly read and re-read the document, taking notes on patterns, tone, etc.
2) Identify sources of evidence like publication details and author's strategies. Determine if the strategies are successful.
3) Examine underlying assumptions and gaps in reasoning. Consider emotional appeals and imagery.
4) Organize analysis paragraphs around themes. A clear thesis should emerge from this.
5) Write and revise the critique, focusing on rhetorical analysis rather than summary and using present tense and author's last names. The critique should follow general organization guidelines.
This document provides guidance on writing a formal argumentative essay. It discusses the key components of an argumentative essay including the introduction, body, and conclusion. The body should include multiple arguments supported by evidence. One should anticipate and refute counterarguments. Formal language requires an objective tone without informal language or contractions. Paragraphs need topic sentences, and coherence is created through linking words.
The document provides guidance on analyzing the rhetorical context and style of a text. For rhetorical context, it discusses analyzing the author's background and credibility, the type and purpose of the source, the intended audience, and sources of information. For style, it discusses analyzing the diction and tone, sentence structure, figurative language, and organization. Understanding the rhetorical context and style of a text is important for critically analyzing what message the author intends to convey and to whom.
This document provides an overview of essay writing. It defines what an essay is and lists its key characteristics as unity, order, brevity, style, and personal touch. Essays are classified into narrative, descriptive, expository, reflective, and imaginative. The parts of an essay are also outlined, including the introduction with a hook, thesis statement, and conclusion. Body paragraphs are supported with topic and detail sentences. Effective essay writing involves outlining an idea, supporting it with examples, and drawing a conclusion.
This document provides an overview of persuasive writing techniques, including defining key terms like main proposition, supposition, introduction hook, counterargument, and call for action. It discusses choosing words carefully based on their denotation and connotation. The document also distinguishes between facts and opinions, and covers logical and emotional appeals in persuasive writing.
The document provides guidance on evaluating arguments, including defining what an argument is, identifying its key parts, and strategies for analyzing and assessing arguments. It discusses evaluating the types of evidence, claims, and support used; identifying logical fallacies, assumptions, and biases; and determining the completeness, validity, and credibility of an argument.
This document discusses different types of nonfiction essays. It explains that an essay is a brief work that discusses a focused topic and includes the writer's opinions and experiences. It notes that an essayist's style reflects their personality and that the tone or attitude is also important. It then lists different types of essays, including narrative essays that tell stories, descriptive essays that build impressions using sensory details, expository essays that provide information or explain processes, persuasive essays that try to convince readers, and reflective essays that express thoughts and feelings on personal experiences or ideas.
Quoting, Paraphrasing, And Summarizingguest7f12cc5
The document discusses quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing source material. It states that a quote must match the original word-for-word, while a paraphrase restates the information in one's own words but retains the essential ideas of the source. A summary distills the main idea of the source into a shorter overview, using broader language than a paraphrase. The document also provides guidance on how to effectively paraphrase source content in research writing through a multi-step process.
An article writing guide outlines the typical structure and elements of an effective article. It recommends first understanding the purpose and audience, then brainstorming ideas and researching the topic. The guide suggests creating an outline with headings before writing the introduction, body, and conclusion. Quotes and examples should be included to engage readers and add credibility. Proper grammar, spelling, and proofreading are also important. The key is to tell a story that grabs readers' attention and takes them on a logical journey from beginning to end.
The document discusses author's purpose in writing, identifying three main categories: to persuade, inform, or entertain. It provides examples of each. Persuasive writing aims to convince the reader of an opinion. Informative writing provides facts on a topic. Entertaining writing includes stories, poetry, and descriptive pieces meant to engage the reader.
This document provides guidance on using counterarguments and rebuttals to strengthen a persuasive essay. It explains that a counterargument addresses views that disagree with the thesis to demonstrate the writer considered alternative perspectives. Including counterarguments establishes credibility and shows other views are valid. The document advises determining opposing views and audiences' potential counterarguments. It provides templates for introducing counterarguments and rebuttals to refute issues raised. Finally, it discusses strategies for including counterarguments and rebuttals within body paragraphs or at the beginning or end of the essay.
This document provides guidance on writing persuasive and argumentative papers. It defines the key difference between the two types of papers - argumentative papers propose a call to action to solve a problem, while persuasive papers discuss problems that may or may not have clear solutions. Both papers require a clear position, background information, strong reasoning and evidence to support the stance, consideration of other positions, and credible sourcing. The document provides tips on choosing a topic, structuring an argument, addressing counterarguments, and examples of each type of paper.
This document introduces creative nonfiction, which tells fact-based stories in an imaginative way. To write creative nonfiction well, authors must learn strong storytelling techniques like setting vivid scenes, having satisfying endings that leave readers wanting more, and sharing personal struggles. While grounded in facts about events, creative nonfiction allows writers flexibility in how they shape and present those facts to craft compelling narratives from true experiences.
Persuasion writing aims to convince the reader of the writer's point of view, while argument writing acknowledges other views but aims to show the writer's perspective is valid and deserves consideration. Persuasion relies more on emotion and opinion to sway the reader, whereas argument offers credible evidence and reasons for its perspective. The goal of persuasion is agreement, while the goal of argument is acknowledgment of a worthy perspective.
This document provides guidance on writing an effective argumentative essay in 3 paragraphs or less. It begins by explaining the purpose is to convince the reader of a particular point of view using facts and examples. Next, it covers the key components of an introduction, body and conclusion. The introduction should grab attention with a strong opening and state the opinion. The body should make arguments supported by evidence, anticipate counterarguments, and discuss opposing views. The conclusion restates the main points and opinion, and calls the reader to action.
Formal and informal writing power pointyoussof1978
This document provides guidance on academic writing skills. It discusses that academic writing uses a formal style with precise language rather than informal styles. Key characteristics of academic writing include using formal tone, third-person perspective, clear focus on the topic rather than opinions, and precise word choices. In contrast, informal writing may use first-person pronouns, colloquial language, and imprecise wording. The document advises writers to employ a formal academic style in works like research papers, essays, and proposals. It provides tips for different parts of the writing process from getting started to revision.
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources for research by outlining eight criteria: authority, accuracy, content, relevance, objectivity, audience, writing style, and currency. For each criterion, questions are provided to determine if a source meets the standard of being relevant, useful, and accurate. Key advice includes not using a source if the author's authority cannot be verified or the information's accuracy is questionable. The intended audience and writing style should also fit the research topic and assignment.
Building a Paper (Thesis statement and Detailed Outline).pptxSyahmiAqeel1
The document provides guidance on developing an effective thesis statement and outline for a research paper. It explains that a thesis statement should be specific and guide the essay by directly answering the assigned prompt. It also discusses how to choose relevant evidence from research notes to support each point in the outline. Students are then instructed to select one of three outlining methods - traditional, cluster, or grid - to organize their thesis, main ideas, sub-points, and evidence in preparation for writing their research paper.
This document discusses the concept of diction in poetry. It begins with a quote about how poets craft words like artisans craft materials. It then defines diction as word choice and explains how words have both denotative and connotative meanings. Denotation is the dictionary definition, while connotation involves cultural associations. The document uses the example of "house" versus "home" to illustrate how words with similar denotations can have different connotations due to personal experience. It emphasizes that understanding connotation is key to understanding an author's intended effects and a reader's reactions.
The body paragraphs in an essay should develop the topic, prove points, and have a consistent pattern. A paragraph contains a topic sentence stating the main idea, supporting sentences with details and examples, and optionally a concluding sentence summarizing the key points. Topic sentences should be complete sentences that are neither too broad nor narrow in scope. Supporting sentences explain, prove, or expand on the topic sentence with facts, examples, statistics or quotations. A concluding sentence restates the main idea or summarizes the key points of the paragraph.
The document provides guidelines for writing a critique in 5 steps:
1) Thoroughly read and re-read the document, taking notes on patterns, tone, etc.
2) Identify sources of evidence like publication details and author's strategies. Determine if the strategies are successful.
3) Examine underlying assumptions and gaps in reasoning. Consider emotional appeals and imagery.
4) Organize analysis paragraphs around themes. A clear thesis should emerge from this.
5) Write and revise the critique, focusing on rhetorical analysis rather than summary and using present tense and author's last names. The critique should follow general organization guidelines.
This document provides guidance on writing a formal argumentative essay. It discusses the key components of an argumentative essay including the introduction, body, and conclusion. The body should include multiple arguments supported by evidence. One should anticipate and refute counterarguments. Formal language requires an objective tone without informal language or contractions. Paragraphs need topic sentences, and coherence is created through linking words.
The document provides guidance on analyzing the rhetorical context and style of a text. For rhetorical context, it discusses analyzing the author's background and credibility, the type and purpose of the source, the intended audience, and sources of information. For style, it discusses analyzing the diction and tone, sentence structure, figurative language, and organization. Understanding the rhetorical context and style of a text is important for critically analyzing what message the author intends to convey and to whom.
This document provides an overview of essay writing. It defines what an essay is and lists its key characteristics as unity, order, brevity, style, and personal touch. Essays are classified into narrative, descriptive, expository, reflective, and imaginative. The parts of an essay are also outlined, including the introduction with a hook, thesis statement, and conclusion. Body paragraphs are supported with topic and detail sentences. Effective essay writing involves outlining an idea, supporting it with examples, and drawing a conclusion.
This document provides an overview of persuasive writing techniques, including defining key terms like main proposition, supposition, introduction hook, counterargument, and call for action. It discusses choosing words carefully based on their denotation and connotation. The document also distinguishes between facts and opinions, and covers logical and emotional appeals in persuasive writing.
The document provides guidance on evaluating arguments, including defining what an argument is, identifying its key parts, and strategies for analyzing and assessing arguments. It discusses evaluating the types of evidence, claims, and support used; identifying logical fallacies, assumptions, and biases; and determining the completeness, validity, and credibility of an argument.
This document discusses different types of nonfiction essays. It explains that an essay is a brief work that discusses a focused topic and includes the writer's opinions and experiences. It notes that an essayist's style reflects their personality and that the tone or attitude is also important. It then lists different types of essays, including narrative essays that tell stories, descriptive essays that build impressions using sensory details, expository essays that provide information or explain processes, persuasive essays that try to convince readers, and reflective essays that express thoughts and feelings on personal experiences or ideas.
Quoting, Paraphrasing, And Summarizingguest7f12cc5
The document discusses quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing source material. It states that a quote must match the original word-for-word, while a paraphrase restates the information in one's own words but retains the essential ideas of the source. A summary distills the main idea of the source into a shorter overview, using broader language than a paraphrase. The document also provides guidance on how to effectively paraphrase source content in research writing through a multi-step process.
An article writing guide outlines the typical structure and elements of an effective article. It recommends first understanding the purpose and audience, then brainstorming ideas and researching the topic. The guide suggests creating an outline with headings before writing the introduction, body, and conclusion. Quotes and examples should be included to engage readers and add credibility. Proper grammar, spelling, and proofreading are also important. The key is to tell a story that grabs readers' attention and takes them on a logical journey from beginning to end.
The document discusses author's purpose in writing, identifying three main categories: to persuade, inform, or entertain. It provides examples of each. Persuasive writing aims to convince the reader of an opinion. Informative writing provides facts on a topic. Entertaining writing includes stories, poetry, and descriptive pieces meant to engage the reader.
This document provides guidance on using counterarguments and rebuttals to strengthen a persuasive essay. It explains that a counterargument addresses views that disagree with the thesis to demonstrate the writer considered alternative perspectives. Including counterarguments establishes credibility and shows other views are valid. The document advises determining opposing views and audiences' potential counterarguments. It provides templates for introducing counterarguments and rebuttals to refute issues raised. Finally, it discusses strategies for including counterarguments and rebuttals within body paragraphs or at the beginning or end of the essay.
This document provides guidance on writing persuasive and argumentative papers. It defines the key difference between the two types of papers - argumentative papers propose a call to action to solve a problem, while persuasive papers discuss problems that may or may not have clear solutions. Both papers require a clear position, background information, strong reasoning and evidence to support the stance, consideration of other positions, and credible sourcing. The document provides tips on choosing a topic, structuring an argument, addressing counterarguments, and examples of each type of paper.
This document introduces creative nonfiction, which tells fact-based stories in an imaginative way. To write creative nonfiction well, authors must learn strong storytelling techniques like setting vivid scenes, having satisfying endings that leave readers wanting more, and sharing personal struggles. While grounded in facts about events, creative nonfiction allows writers flexibility in how they shape and present those facts to craft compelling narratives from true experiences.
Persuasion writing aims to convince the reader of the writer's point of view, while argument writing acknowledges other views but aims to show the writer's perspective is valid and deserves consideration. Persuasion relies more on emotion and opinion to sway the reader, whereas argument offers credible evidence and reasons for its perspective. The goal of persuasion is agreement, while the goal of argument is acknowledgment of a worthy perspective.
This document provides guidance on writing an effective argumentative essay in 3 paragraphs or less. It begins by explaining the purpose is to convince the reader of a particular point of view using facts and examples. Next, it covers the key components of an introduction, body and conclusion. The introduction should grab attention with a strong opening and state the opinion. The body should make arguments supported by evidence, anticipate counterarguments, and discuss opposing views. The conclusion restates the main points and opinion, and calls the reader to action.
Formal and informal writing power pointyoussof1978
This document provides guidance on academic writing skills. It discusses that academic writing uses a formal style with precise language rather than informal styles. Key characteristics of academic writing include using formal tone, third-person perspective, clear focus on the topic rather than opinions, and precise word choices. In contrast, informal writing may use first-person pronouns, colloquial language, and imprecise wording. The document advises writers to employ a formal academic style in works like research papers, essays, and proposals. It provides tips for different parts of the writing process from getting started to revision.
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources for research by outlining eight criteria: authority, accuracy, content, relevance, objectivity, audience, writing style, and currency. For each criterion, questions are provided to determine if a source meets the standard of being relevant, useful, and accurate. Key advice includes not using a source if the author's authority cannot be verified or the information's accuracy is questionable. The intended audience and writing style should also fit the research topic and assignment.
Building a Paper (Thesis statement and Detailed Outline).pptxSyahmiAqeel1
The document provides guidance on developing an effective thesis statement and outline for a research paper. It explains that a thesis statement should be specific and guide the essay by directly answering the assigned prompt. It also discusses how to choose relevant evidence from research notes to support each point in the outline. Students are then instructed to select one of three outlining methods - traditional, cluster, or grid - to organize their thesis, main ideas, sub-points, and evidence in preparation for writing their research paper.
The document provides guidance on writing argumentative essays. It discusses choosing a debatable topic, developing a clear thesis statement, addressing counterarguments, and organizing the essay. The key points are:
- Choose a topic that allows for reasonable arguments on both sides rather than being a statement of fact. A good thesis directly answers the assignment question with a clear position and forecast of evidence.
- Anticipate opposing views and address them in the essay to demonstrate a well-rounded understanding and weaken those counterarguments.
- The essay should be organized logically, either by refuting counterarguments before stating the thesis, or presenting the thesis and evidence first before addressing objections.
This document discusses rhetoric and persuasion. It defines rhetoric as the art of effective speaking and writing. Aristotle studied rhetoric and identified three elements of persuasion: logos which appeals to logic, pathos which appeals to emotion, and ethos which establishes credibility. The document provides tips for using these three elements of persuasion in speeches and writing. It also discusses developing arguments through examples and relating to the audience. Knowing the audience is important for effective persuasion.
Essay Revision and Editing Checklist for Academic Essays U.docxdebishakespeare
Essay Revision and Editing Checklist for Academic Essays
Use this checklist to ensure that the revision and editing work you have completed in the writing process has helped you
to meet the goals of an assignment.
Keep in mind, each assignment may have ADDITIONAL goals and conventions appropriate to established discipline and
conventions.
If you look at this list and do not understand how to complete these tasks or why to complete these tasks, avail yourself
of resources posted for your class or do a web search of your own. The Purdue OWL (Online Writing Lab) is an excellent
starting place.
________________________________________
Ideas/Content
☐ I used brainstorming and a concept map or outline to create and organize my ideas.
☐ My thesis is clear, meaningful, and worthwhile.
☐ My essay relates to my thesis, exploring it with depth and meaning.
☐ My ideas relate to one another.
☐ I have no stray ideas out of place in my writing.
☐ My writing makes complete sense.
________________________________________
Organization
☐ My title is thoughtful.
☐ Ideas are organized in a meaningful way.
☐ The sequence of ideas is logical and intentional.
☐ I have an interesting introduction that effectively leads the reader to the thesis and creates interest.
☐ My ideas flow from one to another.
☐ Each paragraph has a strong, clear topic sentence. Each topic sentence is like a mini-thesis for the paragraph.
☐ I used helpful transitions between main points, (e.g., "First of all," or "Similarly").
☐ The body paragraphs are in logical order, and each paragraph has its own development and relationship with
the thesis.
☐ I have a satisfying conclusion.
Voice & Style
☐ Point of view is consistent and appropriate for the context of the assignment.
☐ The pronoun “you” and any form of 2nd person point of view are avoided (you, your, you’re, yourself). I am not
assuming what the reader thinks, and I am not telling the reader what to think.
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/
☐ The tone and level or writing are appropriate to college-level writing. My writing sounds as intelligent and
educated as I am.
☐ The tone, style, and content are appropriate for my audience of intelligent, educated readers.
__________________________________
Conventions
☐ Each of my paragraphs has one main idea.
☐ I have used correct grammar.
☐ I have used correct punctuation.
☐ I have checked my spelling.
☐ The tone and voice of the essay are appropriate to formal, academic writing.
☐ My final draft contains no typographical errors.
________________________________________
Fluency & Correctness—needed for clarity
☐ My sentences build logically upon the one(s) before.
☐ My sentences are different lengths.
☐ My sentences start in different ways.
☐ The meaning of each of my sentences is clear.
☐ My sentences flow easily from one to another.
☐ I have scrutinized my .
Mapping the IssueFor your Issue Proposal, you organized yourVannaSchrader3
This document provides instructions for mapping a controversy on an issue by describing its history, summarizing at least three positions on the issue from a neutral perspective, and organizing the information into a 6-page paper. It outlines an 8-step process for generating content, including drafting background on the issue, describing positions and their arguments, and appealing to readers' emotions and values. The document also provides guidance on style, tone, formatting, and integrating sources for the intended audience of a fictional university periodical.
This document provides guidance on effective brainstorming, outlining, and structuring papers. It discusses various brainstorming tactics such as listing, clustering, and freewriting to help organize ideas. Outlines should include claims supported by evidence and warrants. Body paragraphs are structured using the Toulmin method of presenting a claim, evidence, and warrant. Introductions include a hook, thesis, and roadmap. Conclusions summarize main points without repetition and leave the reader with questions for further discussion. Reverse outlining allows writers to evaluate a paper's logical flow and progression of ideas.
This document outlines the steps for writing a research paper. It discusses choosing a topic, developing a thesis statement, outlining the paper structure, researching sources, drafting and revising. Key steps include developing a research question to guide source selection, taking detailed notes from sources, creating an outline, and drafting and revising the paper. Students are assigned homework to prepare for research, including developing search terms for their topic.
This document provides guidance for writing a response essay analyzing one of three novels: Night by Elie Wiesel, Outer Dark by Cormac McCarthy, or Room by Emma Donoghue. Students are instructed to write a 4-7 page thesis-driven essay analyzing an aspect of the novel using a critical lens from class. The document outlines choosing a focal point, asking analytical questions, formulating a thesis, writing an introduction, body paragraphs with evidence, and conclusion. It also lists learning outcomes, required skills, best practices, and things to avoid.
Module 7 Discussion Board Algebra1. What does it mean when s.docxmoirarandell
This document provides instructions for students to write a classical argument paper on an approved topic. It outlines the key elements of a classical argument, including: introducing the issue and opposing positions, presenting reasons and evidence to support the student's position, anticipating and refuting counterarguments, and concluding by emphasizing the importance of the issue. Students must write a minimum 1,200-1,500 word paper using at least 5 credible sources to both support their argument and refute opposing positions. The paper should follow standard argumentative structure and formatting guidelines provided.
Project 3 Public ArgumentDue 1118 by midnightGENERAL .docxkacie8xcheco
Project 3: Public Argument
Due: 11/18 by
midnight
GENERAL INFORMATION
Now that you've completed your Controversy Analysis research paper, you've become pretty knowledgeable about your topic. You've probably also developed a new opinion (or strengthened an existing opinion) about your topic. The Public Argument is a chance for you to share your opinion, and back it up with supporting evidence from your research.
Our Public Argument assignment will produce
TWO
end products:
a Written Argument (worth 20% of your final grade, like the other essays) and a Presentation (worth 5% of your final grade).
The Written Argument will be due on
April 24th
; our Presentations will take place
April 22nd-May 2nd
in class.
For your Written Argument, you'll decide on a Stance (
which position do you argue?)
and an Approach (
The type of argument: proposal, causal, position, refutation, evaluative
), as well as a Genre or form/medium for your message. The following are some examples of what most of you have chosen: (
remember to run your choice by me if you haven’t
)
·
A letter to the Editor or Op-Ed in a specific newspaper or magazine
·
A letter to Someone in Power (a legislator/other lawmaker, the head of a company, etc.)
·
A blog post / Facebook note / website/ online petition
·
A video
·
A poster/brochure or pamphlet
This is not an analysis. It’s an argument!
You’ve been looking at and picking apart and putting into conversation everyone else’s texts: Now, it’s your turn to speak your mind. This essay is more creative than the other two, and you’re encouraged to have as much fun with it as possible while still remembering…
the Rhetorical Situation.
-To write your public argument, you must remember both the author’s(s’) and your own rhetorical situation. The rhetorical situation is comprised of the audience, purpose, and context.
*The audience is “for whom” the writing is produced, the persons whose minds and hearts the author hopes to move to think or feel in a certain way.
*The purpose is “for what” the writing is produced, the aim of the author in composing.
*The context includes the time, place, and circumstances in which the writing is written, impacting, in turn, its composition, distribution, and reception.
This assignment will not have a length requirement. The form your writing takes will be based on what Genre you choose to write
in. No matter what form your writing takes, though, it still must:
·
Have a clear thesis, well-supported by researched evidence & your own explanations.
You need to use at least 3 sources to back up you argument
.
·
Be composed in Standard Written English, following appropriate grammar and spelling rules
·
Appropriately cite referenced sources: depending on what format you choose, you might still want to use MLA in-text citation, or you could use footnotes, or hyperlinks – just be CONSISTENT and have a REASON why you chose to cite the way you did.
·
Include a Works Cited page (in standard MLA f.
This document outlines topics from an APA & Writing Workshop course taught by Dr. Cullerton. It discusses challenges with literacy autobiographies such as in-text citations, organization, and conclusions. It also covers different types of writing like narrative, descriptive, expository, persuasive, and analytical. Examples are provided for persuasive and analytical essays. Other topics covered include elements of an essay, writing in response to texts, and defining text complexity.
Essay #1Taking a Position on Food Due by 1159pm on Sunday.docxSALU18
Essay #1:Taking a Position on Food
Due by 11:59pm on Sunday April 23rd
We manipulate the planet and all of its creatures. We create, we consume, we build, and we
destroy, but how often do we consider the processes and people that provide unceasingly for our
unquenchable appetites? How often do we consider the consequences? This essay asks that you
consider the inner (and outer) workings of the US food system and then take a position on a
narrowed down aspect of it.
During this project we might ask ourselves any combination of the following: where does our food
come from, and at what cost? How have our foods been processed, conceived, even constructed, and then shipped and
stored? How do we treat the animals we eat? How should we treat them? How are they killed? How conscious are
we of the world we are taking from every single day? Where do we fit in? What do we have to say?
To accomplish your task, you will be using pairings of articles I provide in order to take part in
an ongoing conversation about food. These readings will require you to look closely at what we
eat and how our consumption shapes the world, in both positive and negative ways.
You will need to first consider our relationship with food and the consequences of our eating
habits, on individuals, societies, and the planet that we share, then narrow down your focus to an
individual and focused topic/idea, which you will then research independently so that you might
enter into a scholarly conversation. The goal of this essay is to either make your own claim about
your subject, or to support an already established claim with rational and logical reasons and
evidence in order to convince your reader to take up the same position that you hold.
This essay need not be a soapbox for any political agenda; instead, we are looking for a balance
in rhetorical strategies. Using ethos, pathos, and logos effectively means respecting all viewpoints
while backing up your claims with reputable sources and logical insights/analysis.
In the wise words of Christopher Hitchens: “That which can be asserted without
evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
While I value each and every one of your opinions, scholarly readers are less forgiving. Imagine
your audience to be educated readers who are familiar with the topic and themes we will be
exploring. These readers will expect you to back up your claims, and to use reputable sources.
See the end of this prompt for paper specifics / requirements.
Reading and Research
I am providing you with a group of food-related readings. Some of the readings will be
mandatory, as in I expect everyone to read them and use them in their papers. The others are
paired options that you will choose from. Each reading will be labeled on the Module I introduce
it as either mandatory or optional. They are also listed at the end of this prompt.
Make sure to take detailed notes of the sources you do read. It is alw ...
This document discusses the art of rhetoric and persuasion. It outlines Aristotle's three elements of persuasion: logos (appealing to logic), pathos (appealing to emotions), and ethos (establishing credibility). The document also provides tips for relating to an audience, developing an argument, balancing audience and purpose, and writing an effective persuasive letter or speech.
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that ssuser774ad41
The document provides instructions and evaluation criteria for an argument essay assignment. Students must write a 3-4 page essay arguing one side of an issue related to climate change, universal healthcare, or employer access to social media. The essay must have an introduction with a thesis, 3 body paragraphs with evidence from sources, and a conclusion. It will be evaluated on the introduction and conclusion, organization, argument development, use of sources, length, writing quality, and following APA format.
Rhetorical Analysis Prompt and Rubric Length 3-5 full .docxSUBHI7
Rhetorical Analysis Prompt and Rubric
Length: 3-5 full pages. Your "Works Cited" page does not count.
Due dates:
First draft due by Wednesday September 13 @ 11:55 PM (Online Peer Review)
Second draft due Friday September 22 @ 11:55 PM
All optional drafts of all essays are due by December 8 @ 11:55 PM.
Select and closely read one of the following essays from your textbook:
"Is Google Making Us Stupid?" by Nicholas Carr; page 735
"Our Fear of Immigrants" by Jeremy Adam Smith; page 750
“Anti-Intellectualism: Why We Hate the Smart Kids” by Grant Penrod; page 759
After selecting one, please follow the guidelines below, and articulate your argument of the
essay’s effectiveness. Use the following questions for analyzing an argument on pages 115-116
in your textbook as a guide:
• What is the claim? What is the main point the writer is trying to make? How does the
author qualify his/her thesis?
• What support does the writer offer for the claim? What reasons are used to support the
claim? What evidence does author use to back up those reasons (e.g., anecdotes, data,
statistics, etc.)? Are the reasons and evidence convincing?
• How does the author appeal to the audience? These discussions will require you to
demonstrate your knowledge of the rhetorical appeals we discussed in class.
o pathos – appeal to emotion
o ethos – appeal to credibility
o logos – appeal to logic
o kairos/“kairotic moment” – “of the time;” what motivated the author to write
the argument at the time?
• Is the argument balanced? Does the author address potential counterarguments? If so,
how? Does he/she respond to them reasonably and with respect, or is he/she dismissive of
them?
Be sure to properly cite your article, both in-text and on a "Works Cited" page. See the
Purdue OWL resource at the top of our Moodle page and/or pages 496-548 of your textbook for
MLA rules/guidelines.
Getting Started: Consider the following organization:
Paragraph One: Summary
Begin your essay with an effective, brief summary of the source text. The key here is
brevity.
Paragraph Two: Introduction of Purpose, Audience, Effectiveness of Source
Follow your summary paragraph with another brief paragraph that transitions from
your summary to your thesis and rhetorical analysis. This paragraph should introduce two
key components: the author’s intended purpose and intended audience. Most
importantly, this paragraph must end with a well-developed thesis statement arguing the
effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the source author’s argument.
Your thesis should clearly state whether the source essay was effective or ineffective (use
the "because clause") and should be the last sentence of your second paragraph.
Here are a few models:
Although [author]’s essay was intended to [purpose of essay], “[title of essay]”
is ultimately ineffective because [forecast major points of your analysis (reasons
for ineffectiveness)].
[Author’s] es ...
This document provides an agenda and notes for an English class. It discusses evaluating sources, writing introductions for social action projects, and annotated bibliographies. The instructor reviews what the class has covered so far, including blog posts, social diversity narratives, and brainstorming topics. Guidance is given on peer reviewing introductions, trust in the editing process, summarizing sources, and sample annotated bibliography entries. Formatting and required elements are outlined for assignments on introductions and annotated bibliographies.
The document is a lesson plan for teaching students how to critically analyze persuasive texts. It discusses different types of evidence an author may use to support their claim, including statistical, testimonial, anecdotal, and analogical evidence. It also warns students about logical fallacies authors may use, specifically mentioning the false dichotomy fallacy where only two options are presented when more likely exist. The lesson encourages students to separate an author's argument from unnecessary language and identify the primary claim being made and whether sufficient evidence is provided to support it.
This document discusses the writing triangle which consists of purpose, voice, and audience. It emphasizes determining your purpose and goals before writing by asking questions like what you want to say and what effect you hope to achieve. Different types of writing like description, narration, process, and argument are discussed. The importance of considering your voice and intended audience is also covered.
This document provides instructions for writing an essay analyzing one of several short stories read in class. Students are asked to choose an aspect of the story to analyze, such as the author's style or symbolism, and write a 4-7 page thesis-driven essay making an argument about their chosen aspect. The essay should include an introduction with thesis, body paragraphs with analysis supported by evidence from the story, and a conclusion. Guidelines are provided on developing a thesis, writing each section of the paper, and citing sources. The goal is for students to practice critical analysis and writing skills.
Similar to Rhetorical analysis thesis statements ENG 102 (20)
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
2. Thesis
Statement
Your thesis statement is your opinion about the rhetoric used in
the article
Your thesis statement is your main idea
It is a statement, not a question
It should not announce
• Don’t say “I will discuss how this article uses…”
• Don’t say “this essay will prove that…”
• Don’t say “In my opinion,” Just say the idea!
It should state how the article is attempting to persuade
It should not state your feelings about the topic of the article!
3. Prewriting
■ To gather information for the analysis, you must carefully review
every element of the article.
■ Answering questions on the rhetorical analysis worksheet will help
with that!
4. RhetoricalAnalysisWorksheet:
Determine the Basic Facts
The first set of questions helps you determine what is being argued by whom to
whom:
■ Title of article, author, date of publication, and place of publication
■ Purpose/Message: What goal does the author have in communicating with the
audience?
■ Audience: To whom is the article directed? How do you know? Remember that the
audience is not everyone.
– Consider who is going to be interested in the article’s message? An article directed
at Generation Z is going to look different than an article aimed at Baby Boomers.
You might consider how should the words/images differ for a different audience,
such as, for example, an audience of women?Teens?
5. RhetoricalAnalysisWorksheet:
Determine How the AdWorks
The next set of questions is about HOW the advertisement delivers the argument,
what strategies are used
■ Appeal to Logos: Does the author use example, facts, and statistics to build his/her
argument? Where? How? If not, why?Was anything omitted? If so, what was the impact?
Where do you see this appeal in the article?
■ Appeal to Pathos: Where and how does the author connect with the audience on an
emotional level? Is this effective in persuading the audience? If so, how? If not, why?Where do
you see this appeal in the article?
■ Appeal to Ethos: Does the author come across as trustworthy, credible, and having integrity?
What do you know or what can you learn about him or her? If the author presents information
or secondary research, is it credible? Explain.Where do you see this appeal in the article?
6. RhetoricalAnalysisWorksheet:
Determine How the AdWorks (cont’d)
■ Stereotypes/Assumptions: Does the argument reflect stereotypes about
race, gender, age, etc.? Where do you see this appeal in the article?
■ Fallacies: Are there any holes in the argument? Is there anywhere in the text
that the logic breaks down? Does the author make generalizations or leap to
conclusions? Explain what doesn’t make sense and how.What does the ad say
about the opposing view? Is there any direct or indirect criticism or
generalizations or ad hominem attacks?Where do you see this appeal in the
article?
7. RhetoricalAnalysisWorksheet:
Evaluate theArgument
■ Evaluation: Once you have gathered information about your text,
you can decide about whether it is effective as an argument.
Examine the information above and your overall impression of the
text. Do you think the author was effective overall in making his or
her argument?
8. WorkingThesis Statement
■ Now you are ready to draft your working thesis statement.
■ Your thesis statement will be the answer to the following
questions:
■ What is the message of the article? How does the article
persuade the audience of their message?
9. GoodThesis Statement Examples
■ The article relied heavily on pathos and
contained some logical fallacies but was
able to make a persuasive argument.
■ The article uses a combination of pathos
and logos, making appeals to the
audience's emotions while providing
statistics to create an effective argument.
■ This ad uses the appeals of pathos and
ethos effectively. However, the use of
indirect ad hominem causes doubt about
the truth of the claims in the article.
■ Each of these examples clearly identifies
the rhetorical techniques used by the
article to persuade
■ They are all about the same article, but
they focus on different aspects.
■ One focuses on pathos alone.Another
focuses on pathos and logos.And the third
focuses on pathos, ethos, and a fallacy.
10. BadThesis Statements Examples
■ America has grown immensely and should
continue to grow, whether that be
investing in properties, being wedded, or
having a secure job.
■ America is a great country; it is a place that
we can call home and where we can feel
safe and secure.
■ The article is right about America needing
to secure the borders.
■ These are bad thesis statements because
they do not focus on the rhetorical
techniques used by the ad to persuade.
■ Instead, they focus on the article’s message
about America and how they feel about
America, not about the rhetoric used.
■ Don’t focus on the issue! Focus on the
rhetoric.
■ I do not care how you feel about the issue; I
want your opinion about the rhetoric they
used!
11. To create a
thesis
statement
Remember, a thesis statement consists
of
a topic + a controlling idea
The article is your topic
The controlling idea is your opinion about
what rhetorical techniques were used
12. Thesis StatementTemplates
The article effectively convinces the
audience of _____ through the use
of _______ paired with ________.
• The article effectively convinces the
audience that climate change is real
through the use of statistics and
surveys paired with emotional
stories.
Although the article uses _________
convincingly, the use of
____________ may be a problem for
the audience of ________________.
• Although the article includes many
convincing logical arguments, the
audience may doubt the ad’s
objectivity because of the sarcastic
tone.
13. Thesis StatementTemplates
The article uses _________ and
____________ to create an effective
argument for _______________.
• The article usesThompson’s personal
stories and tells of his extensive
research in the area to make the
audience believe in his credibility.
These appeals to ethos, combined
with his friendly tone, creates an
effective argument.
The ad employs the rhetorical appeals
of _______ and ________ effectively.
However, the use of _______ causes
doubt about the truth of the claims.
• The article employs the rhetorical
appeals of pathos and ethos
effectively. However, the use of
unsupported logical appeals causes
the audience to doubt that the claim
is supported by research.
14. OnTemplates forThesis Statements
■ You do not have to use the templates.They are just there as
guides.
■ Focus on the rhetorical techniques used by the article, e.g.,
rhetorical appeals and logical fallacies
■ Note: you are not seeking to find all the rhetorical appeals,
advertising appeals, and logical fallacies.You are seeking to find
which of the rhetorical appeals, advertising appeals, and logical
fallacies.
– Thus, your thesis may focus on just one appeal or your thesis may
focus on all the appeals.
15. Thesis is a Road Map
■ Your thesis statement must serve as road
maps to the rest of the essay and clearly
inform the reader what discussion points
the essay is going to address and in
which order.
■ It may be one or two sentences.
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND
16. Road Map Example
Thesis statement: This ad uses a combination of pathos and logos, making appeals
to the audience's emotions (1 and 2) and their need to feel safe (3), while providing
statistics (4) to support the idea that Reagan is the ideal candidate.
■ Body Paragraph 1 (PATHOS) – appealing to emotion through the music playing in
the background
■ Body Paragraph 2 (PATHOS) – appealing to emotion by showing scenes from
major life events
■ Body paragraph 3 (PATHOS) – appealing to the audience’s need to feel safe
through use of specific word choice and visuals
■ Body paragraph 4 (LOGOS) – appealing to logic by providing facts and statistics
from Reagan’s first term
Each numbered point will turn into a body paragraph. The reader knows exactly
what points you are going to address and in what order.
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND
17. Discussion Point = Body Paragraph
■ Every listed discussion point will eventually turn into a body
paragraph of your essay, so you need to make sure that each
point can be supported with examples from the
advertisement.
■ You also need to make sure there is no repetition, and each
discussion point addresses a new idea and contributes
something new to the overall argument.
18. Thesis –Work in Progress
■ Note that you may change your thesis statement at any stage of working
on your project – hence, the name “working thesis statement.” It is work
in progress.
– You may discover that you cannot find any examples to support one of
the discussion points. It is OK to strike it from your thesis.
– While doing your analysis, you may find another argument. You should
definitely include it into your thesis.
– You may realize that two discussion points in your thesis are too similar.
You may combine those two points into one and discuss it in just one
body paragraph to avoid repetition.
– You may come up with better phrasing for one of your discussion points
or make revisions to the sentence structure to make it more reader-
friendly and clear.
19. StrongThesis Statement
A strong thesis statement for a rhetorical analysis essay:
– Avoids using the first person or phrases like “I believe” or “I think”
– Serves as a map to the rest of your essay and guides the reader
through it
– Asserts your conclusion and takes a stand on the author’s
rhetorical strategies
– States what techniques you will be analyzing, and the impact of
these techniques on the effectiveness of the text
– Is the last sentence of your introduction.
20.
21. Credit
■ Much of this presentation is taken directly from “How toWrite aThesis Statement for
RhetoricalAnalysis” by Dr.Tatiana Keeling, Central Arizona College, Spring 2020.