This document summarizes a research paper about modeling retirement savings when contributions are made and labor income is used as a benchmark for investments. The key points are:
1) A retirement savings model is presented where a plan sponsor makes contributions to finance an employee's retirement. The goal is to ensure the employee can maintain their consumption after retiring based on their labor income.
2) Dynamic programming is used to derive optimal investment and contribution strategies as functions of the wealth-to-income ratio and wage growth rate.
3) The analysis finds that contribution payments significantly increase risk-taking at low wealth levels. It also finds that considering downside risk can paradoxically increase risky investing at low wealth levels due to increasing relative risk
- Peter Lynch purchased 100 shares of Iomega Corp. 3 months ago at $50 per share. He received $0.25 dividends per share last month. The shares are now worth $56 each.
- The document discusses concepts related to risk and return such as random variables, probability, moments, variance, standard deviation, and covariance. It provides an example of computing these statistics for two companies.
- Portfolio theory holds that combining securities reduces risk through diversification. The correlation between securities also impacts the risk of a portfolio. The portfolio with the highest expected return for a given level of risk makes up the efficient frontier.
- Direct real estate outperformed other asset classes on a risk-adjusted basis based on summary statistics of returns from 1987-1999 in the UK. Bonds also outperformed equities during this period.
- Direct real estate had a negative correlation with other asset classes, providing diversification benefits, while indirect real estate was strongly positively correlated with equities.
- During an economic downturn from 1993-1995 in the UK, direct real estate increased while other asset classes declined, demonstrating its diversification properties.
- A mean variance analysis found that an optimal portfolio allocated 57% to direct real estate, 41% to bonds, 2% to equities, and 0% to indirect real estate, achieving the highest risk
This document discusses risk and return analysis for equity shares. It defines risk as the possibility of the actual outcome differing from the expected outcome, and return as the reward for undertaking an investment. It discusses calculating return using techniques like net asset value and calculating risk using statistical methods like standard deviation. Equity shareholders take on risk but can potentially earn profits. The relationship between higher risk and higher potential returns is also covered.
This document discusses key concepts related to risk and return including:
1. Definitions of actual, expected, and required returns. Expected return should equal required return for fair pricing.
2. Sources of total risk including systematic and unsystematic risk. Unsystematic risk is diversifiable while systematic risk requires compensation.
3. Measures of return such as holding period return and arithmetic/geometric means. Measures of risk include variance, standard deviation, and downside risk.
4. The relationship between risk and return showing that higher risk investments require higher expected returns. Investor indifference curves illustrate risk preferences.
5. Models relating return and risk including the CAPM and multifactor models. Security pricing relates
This document summarizes a research paper that develops a model of how "growth options" in a firm's technology can generate value above and beyond the present value of current cash flows. The model shows how variation in a technological frontier can lead to fluctuations in firm value unrelated to current performance. Simulations of the model produce results consistent with empirical findings, such as small coefficients on Tobin's Q and larger coefficients on cash flow in investment regressions. The model also demonstrates how growth options can cause excess volatility in firm valuation relative to cash flows.
The document discusses key statistical terms used in analyzing portfolio performance including mean, standard deviation, variance, correlation coefficient, and normal distribution. It explains how mean measures average returns, variance and standard deviation measure risk/volatility, and correlation measures the relationship between two investments. The document also covers portfolio theory, the efficient frontier, and risk/return analysis tools like the Sharpe Ratio and Value at Risk (VAR) that are used to evaluate portfolio performance based on expected return and risk.
The document discusses the concepts of realized return, expected return, risk, and the efficient market hypothesis. It provides examples of calculating realized returns from investments in stocks and defines expected return as the average of possible future returns weighted by their probabilities. Risk is measured using variance and standard deviation, with higher values indicating greater risk. The efficient market hypothesis suggests that market prices reflect all available information.
Return and risk of portfolio with probabilityshijintp
This document outlines a study on predicting the return and risk of individual securities and portfolios. It discusses the objectives, methodology, variables, and limitations of the study. Regression analysis and probability assumptions are used to predict future security returns under various economic scenarios. The Sharpe model is applied to construct an optimal two-stock portfolio of Raymond and Axis Bank with an expected return of 28.14% and risk of 4.26%. The study demonstrates using historical data and fundamental analysis to estimate future security performance and portfolio risk-return.
- Peter Lynch purchased 100 shares of Iomega Corp. 3 months ago at $50 per share. He received $0.25 dividends per share last month. The shares are now worth $56 each.
- The document discusses concepts related to risk and return such as random variables, probability, moments, variance, standard deviation, and covariance. It provides an example of computing these statistics for two companies.
- Portfolio theory holds that combining securities reduces risk through diversification. The correlation between securities also impacts the risk of a portfolio. The portfolio with the highest expected return for a given level of risk makes up the efficient frontier.
- Direct real estate outperformed other asset classes on a risk-adjusted basis based on summary statistics of returns from 1987-1999 in the UK. Bonds also outperformed equities during this period.
- Direct real estate had a negative correlation with other asset classes, providing diversification benefits, while indirect real estate was strongly positively correlated with equities.
- During an economic downturn from 1993-1995 in the UK, direct real estate increased while other asset classes declined, demonstrating its diversification properties.
- A mean variance analysis found that an optimal portfolio allocated 57% to direct real estate, 41% to bonds, 2% to equities, and 0% to indirect real estate, achieving the highest risk
This document discusses risk and return analysis for equity shares. It defines risk as the possibility of the actual outcome differing from the expected outcome, and return as the reward for undertaking an investment. It discusses calculating return using techniques like net asset value and calculating risk using statistical methods like standard deviation. Equity shareholders take on risk but can potentially earn profits. The relationship between higher risk and higher potential returns is also covered.
This document discusses key concepts related to risk and return including:
1. Definitions of actual, expected, and required returns. Expected return should equal required return for fair pricing.
2. Sources of total risk including systematic and unsystematic risk. Unsystematic risk is diversifiable while systematic risk requires compensation.
3. Measures of return such as holding period return and arithmetic/geometric means. Measures of risk include variance, standard deviation, and downside risk.
4. The relationship between risk and return showing that higher risk investments require higher expected returns. Investor indifference curves illustrate risk preferences.
5. Models relating return and risk including the CAPM and multifactor models. Security pricing relates
This document summarizes a research paper that develops a model of how "growth options" in a firm's technology can generate value above and beyond the present value of current cash flows. The model shows how variation in a technological frontier can lead to fluctuations in firm value unrelated to current performance. Simulations of the model produce results consistent with empirical findings, such as small coefficients on Tobin's Q and larger coefficients on cash flow in investment regressions. The model also demonstrates how growth options can cause excess volatility in firm valuation relative to cash flows.
The document discusses key statistical terms used in analyzing portfolio performance including mean, standard deviation, variance, correlation coefficient, and normal distribution. It explains how mean measures average returns, variance and standard deviation measure risk/volatility, and correlation measures the relationship between two investments. The document also covers portfolio theory, the efficient frontier, and risk/return analysis tools like the Sharpe Ratio and Value at Risk (VAR) that are used to evaluate portfolio performance based on expected return and risk.
The document discusses the concepts of realized return, expected return, risk, and the efficient market hypothesis. It provides examples of calculating realized returns from investments in stocks and defines expected return as the average of possible future returns weighted by their probabilities. Risk is measured using variance and standard deviation, with higher values indicating greater risk. The efficient market hypothesis suggests that market prices reflect all available information.
Return and risk of portfolio with probabilityshijintp
This document outlines a study on predicting the return and risk of individual securities and portfolios. It discusses the objectives, methodology, variables, and limitations of the study. Regression analysis and probability assumptions are used to predict future security returns under various economic scenarios. The Sharpe model is applied to construct an optimal two-stock portfolio of Raymond and Axis Bank with an expected return of 28.14% and risk of 4.26%. The study demonstrates using historical data and fundamental analysis to estimate future security performance and portfolio risk-return.
This document discusses key concepts in capital market theory and risk/return analysis, including:
1) Defining average and expected rates of return, and how to measure risk for individual assets using standard deviation and variance.
2) Calculating historical average returns for securities and determining the relationship between higher risk and higher expected returns.
3) Explaining how expected risk is calculated using variance, and how risk-averse, risk-neutral, and risk-seeking investors approach investments differently depending on risk and return levels.
This document summarizes a paper that explores how actuaries can apply techniques from financial economics in their work. It presents several case studies using concepts like risk discount rates, locking-in adjustments, and risk neutral methodologies. The case studies value a personal equity plan and examine asset-liability studies and capital adequacy from the perspective of financial economics. It includes computer code with examples to demonstrate stochastic modeling and valuation. The paper aims to bring these new techniques into the actuarial profession for discussion and potential wider application.
Expected value return & standard deviationJahanzeb Memon
This document defines key concepts related to expected value, expected return, and standard deviation. It explains that expected value is the weighted average of all possible values of a random variable. Expected return is calculated by multiplying the probability and return of each possible scenario and summing the results. The document provides an example of calculating expected return using four scenarios. It also defines standard deviation as a measure of how spread out data is from the mean.
This document discusses the relationship between risk and return in investments. It defines total risk as the sum of systematic and unsystematic risk. Systematic risk stems from external market factors that affect all investments, while unsystematic risk is specific to a particular company. The expected return and risk of individual stocks varies, with higher risk investments generally offering higher returns. A portfolio combines multiple assets to reduce overall risk through diversification. The portfolio risk depends on the covariance and correlation between the individual assets' returns. Diversifying across assets with low correlation is an effective way to reduce risk.
The document discusses the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and its use in calculating the required rate of return for Greggs plc. It provides background on the development of the CAPM by Markowitz and Sharpe. The author then calculates the beta and required rate of return for Greggs using 5 years of stock price data and the CAPM formula. While the CAPM is widely used, the document also discusses criticisms of the model, such as its unrealistic assumptions and inability to explain all returns. Overall, the CAPM remains a commonly used model despite its limitations.
This document summarizes key concepts from Chapter 5 of Principles of Managerial Finance by Lawrence J. Gitman, which focuses on risk and return. It discusses measuring risk for single and multiple assets, the benefits of diversification, and international diversification. It then introduces the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) as a tool for valuing securities based on their non-diversifiable risk relative to the market. The chapter materials include study guides, problem templates, and answers to review questions about risk measurement, diversification, beta calculation, and the security market line.
The document discusses the relationship between risk and return, known as the risk-return nexus. It defines key concepts like risk, return, systematic and unsystematic risk. It explains that total risk is comprised of systematic and unsystematic risk, but that unsystematic risk can be diversified away. The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) asserts that the expected return of an asset depends only on its systematic risk. Empirical analysis of CAPM shows strong correlation between market returns and the returns of various bonds, supporting the model.
The document discusses probability-based approaches for calculating expected returns and variance under uncertainty. It provides an example using return data for a stock to calculate the expected return of 9.25% and variance of 0.02%. It also discusses how portfolio return and variance depends on asset weights, the individual asset expected returns and variances, and the correlation between the assets. Assuming the two example assets are perfectly negatively correlated, it calculates the asset weights needed for a zero risk portfolio and the expected return of that portfolio as 25.36%. Finally, it discusses limits to diversification in practice, such as the inability to hold all securities and that only unsystematic risk can be reduced through diversification.
1. The document discusses nominal and effective interest rates, explaining that nominal rates do not account for compounding frequency while effective rates do.
2. It provides an example of a 12% nominal annual interest rate with monthly compounding being equivalent to a 1% interest rate per month.
3. Nominal rates are always lower than equivalent effective annual rates due to differences in compounding frequency, so effective rates provide a better comparison.
Chapter7 an introduction to risk and returnRodel Falculan
This chapter discusses risk and return in financial markets. It defines realized and expected rates of return as well as risk. Historically, riskier investments like small stocks have achieved higher average returns than less risky investments like government bonds, but also experienced greater price fluctuations. The chapter compares arithmetic and geometric average returns and explains why the geometric average best measures the compound growth rate. The efficient market hypothesis posits that market prices instantly reflect all available information.
2010 09 the empirical law of active managementbfmresearch
The document proposes a new analytical framework called the Empirical Law of Active Management to assess the skill and diversification of portfolio managers. It generalizes the Fundamental Law of Active Management. The author applies this framework to analyze the evolution of skill and diversification among 2,798 U.S. mutual funds since 1980. The analysis finds that skill has declined while diversification has increased among U.S. mutual funds. The author proposes two explanations for the decrease in skill: 1) growth in mutual fund assets has made it harder to outperform the market, and 2) funds have responded to demand by creating less informationally-content funds.
Business Finance Chapter 11 Risk and returnTinku Kumar
This chapter discusses predicting stock market returns and measuring risk. It introduces expected returns and standard deviation as measures of average return and risk. It then discusses how new, unexpected information can impact stock prices and returns. It also introduces beta as a measure of a stock's systematic, market risk. The chapter concludes by discussing the security market line and capital asset pricing model, which relate expected return and risk by establishing the market risk premium.
This report analyzes liability-driven investment strategies to hedge risks for pension funds. It first discusses the pension crisis and identifies key risks like shifting demographics, market volatility, and interest rates. It then models pension liabilities using actuarial assumptions and cash flow projections. Several hedging strategies are proposed, including duration matching with futures. Back-testing finds that combining corporate bond and long-term Treasury futures best hedges risks. The results suggest heavier weighting of corporate bonds and stocks for underfunded plans.
Security Analysis and Portfolio ManagementShrey Sao
Modern portfolio theory (MPT) provides a framework for constructing investment portfolios to maximize expected return based on a given level of market risk. MPT assumes investors aim to maximize returns for a given level of risk. It uses variance as a measure of risk and covariance to capture how asset returns move together. The efficient frontier graph shows the set of optimal portfolios that offer the highest expected return for a given level of risk. Individual investors select the portfolio on the efficient frontier that maximizes their utility based on their risk tolerance. MPT emphasizes diversification and the benefits of holding inefficiently priced assets.
Usse average internal rate of return (airr), don't use internal rate of retur...Futurum2
This is to document the email correspondences with Prof. Peter M. DeMarzo (Stanford University) and Prof. Carlo Alberto Magni with regards to Average Internal Rate of Return in Dec 2015.
The document discusses risk and return in investing. It explains that equity investments like stocks historically have higher average returns of over 10% compared to debt investments like bonds that return 3-4%, but stocks are also more volatile. It defines risk as the variability of returns, and introduces the concepts of systematic risk that affects all stocks equally and unsystematic risk that is specific to individual stocks. Diversification can reduce unsystematic risk but not systematic risk. It also discusses measuring market risk through a stock's beta value, which represents its volatility relative to the overall market.
The document discusses risk and rates of return, including stand-alone risk, portfolio risk, and the Capital Asset Pricing Model. It defines risk as the chance of an unfavorable outcome and discusses how risk is measured using concepts like standard deviation, beta, and the capital market line. Diversification across many assets or asset classes can reduce risk for a portfolio, though not below the market risk.
“Over” and “Under” Valued Financial Institutions: Evidence from a “Fair-Value...Ilias Lekkos
The aim of the study is to present our approach that allows us to evaluate relative over- and under-valuation of financial institutions based on the distance between their market-based price to book ratios and our estimated "fair-value" P/Bs.
This document summarizes a paper that examines the sustainability of pension schemes. It discusses challenges facing defined benefit pension schemes from poor market returns and low interest rates. It also discusses challenges for pay-as-you-go public pension schemes from lower tax revenues and rising fiscal deficits. The paper then presents an actuarial model to estimate costs of supporting occupational and public pension schemes under different assumptions. It analyzes how lower economic growth and aging populations could increase liabilities and contribution rates for pay-as-you-go schemes. Finally, it discusses challenges occupational plans may face from changes in pension accounting standards and derivatives market reforms.
Scenario generation and stochastic programming models for asset liabiltiy man...Nicha Tatsaneeyapan
This document discusses scenario generation methods for asset liability management models. It proposes a multi-stage stochastic programming model for a Dutch pension fund to determine optimal investment policies. Two methods for generating scenarios are explored: randomly sampled event trees and event trees that fit the mean and covariance of returns. Rolling horizon simulations are used to compare the performance of the stochastic programming approach to a fixed mix model. The results show that appropriately generated scenarios can significantly improve the performance of the stochastic programming model relative to the fixed mix benchmark.
This document presents an estimated arbitrage-free model that jointly models nominal and real US Treasury yields. It estimates separate arbitrage-free Nelson-Siegel models for nominal and real yields, finding a three-factor model fits nominal yields well and a two-factor model fits real yields. It then estimates a four-factor joint model that fits both yield curves. The joint model is used to decompose breakeven inflation rates into inflation expectations and inflation risk premium components.
Welcome to the fifth edition of Outline, Redington’s quarterly collection of thought-pieces designed to help institutional investors make smarter and more informed decisions.
This edition features short articles on the future of pensions policy, the complexities of running a pension scheme and how technology can help overcome them, risks inherent from gilt and swap rate differences, an outcome-driven approach to fund management, a review of asset classes in 2013, plus an overview of the global macro environment.
We hope you find the articles interesting and helpful as you consider how best to manage the risk-adjusted return of your portfolios
This document discusses key concepts in capital market theory and risk/return analysis, including:
1) Defining average and expected rates of return, and how to measure risk for individual assets using standard deviation and variance.
2) Calculating historical average returns for securities and determining the relationship between higher risk and higher expected returns.
3) Explaining how expected risk is calculated using variance, and how risk-averse, risk-neutral, and risk-seeking investors approach investments differently depending on risk and return levels.
This document summarizes a paper that explores how actuaries can apply techniques from financial economics in their work. It presents several case studies using concepts like risk discount rates, locking-in adjustments, and risk neutral methodologies. The case studies value a personal equity plan and examine asset-liability studies and capital adequacy from the perspective of financial economics. It includes computer code with examples to demonstrate stochastic modeling and valuation. The paper aims to bring these new techniques into the actuarial profession for discussion and potential wider application.
Expected value return & standard deviationJahanzeb Memon
This document defines key concepts related to expected value, expected return, and standard deviation. It explains that expected value is the weighted average of all possible values of a random variable. Expected return is calculated by multiplying the probability and return of each possible scenario and summing the results. The document provides an example of calculating expected return using four scenarios. It also defines standard deviation as a measure of how spread out data is from the mean.
This document discusses the relationship between risk and return in investments. It defines total risk as the sum of systematic and unsystematic risk. Systematic risk stems from external market factors that affect all investments, while unsystematic risk is specific to a particular company. The expected return and risk of individual stocks varies, with higher risk investments generally offering higher returns. A portfolio combines multiple assets to reduce overall risk through diversification. The portfolio risk depends on the covariance and correlation between the individual assets' returns. Diversifying across assets with low correlation is an effective way to reduce risk.
The document discusses the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and its use in calculating the required rate of return for Greggs plc. It provides background on the development of the CAPM by Markowitz and Sharpe. The author then calculates the beta and required rate of return for Greggs using 5 years of stock price data and the CAPM formula. While the CAPM is widely used, the document also discusses criticisms of the model, such as its unrealistic assumptions and inability to explain all returns. Overall, the CAPM remains a commonly used model despite its limitations.
This document summarizes key concepts from Chapter 5 of Principles of Managerial Finance by Lawrence J. Gitman, which focuses on risk and return. It discusses measuring risk for single and multiple assets, the benefits of diversification, and international diversification. It then introduces the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) as a tool for valuing securities based on their non-diversifiable risk relative to the market. The chapter materials include study guides, problem templates, and answers to review questions about risk measurement, diversification, beta calculation, and the security market line.
The document discusses the relationship between risk and return, known as the risk-return nexus. It defines key concepts like risk, return, systematic and unsystematic risk. It explains that total risk is comprised of systematic and unsystematic risk, but that unsystematic risk can be diversified away. The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) asserts that the expected return of an asset depends only on its systematic risk. Empirical analysis of CAPM shows strong correlation between market returns and the returns of various bonds, supporting the model.
The document discusses probability-based approaches for calculating expected returns and variance under uncertainty. It provides an example using return data for a stock to calculate the expected return of 9.25% and variance of 0.02%. It also discusses how portfolio return and variance depends on asset weights, the individual asset expected returns and variances, and the correlation between the assets. Assuming the two example assets are perfectly negatively correlated, it calculates the asset weights needed for a zero risk portfolio and the expected return of that portfolio as 25.36%. Finally, it discusses limits to diversification in practice, such as the inability to hold all securities and that only unsystematic risk can be reduced through diversification.
1. The document discusses nominal and effective interest rates, explaining that nominal rates do not account for compounding frequency while effective rates do.
2. It provides an example of a 12% nominal annual interest rate with monthly compounding being equivalent to a 1% interest rate per month.
3. Nominal rates are always lower than equivalent effective annual rates due to differences in compounding frequency, so effective rates provide a better comparison.
Chapter7 an introduction to risk and returnRodel Falculan
This chapter discusses risk and return in financial markets. It defines realized and expected rates of return as well as risk. Historically, riskier investments like small stocks have achieved higher average returns than less risky investments like government bonds, but also experienced greater price fluctuations. The chapter compares arithmetic and geometric average returns and explains why the geometric average best measures the compound growth rate. The efficient market hypothesis posits that market prices instantly reflect all available information.
2010 09 the empirical law of active managementbfmresearch
The document proposes a new analytical framework called the Empirical Law of Active Management to assess the skill and diversification of portfolio managers. It generalizes the Fundamental Law of Active Management. The author applies this framework to analyze the evolution of skill and diversification among 2,798 U.S. mutual funds since 1980. The analysis finds that skill has declined while diversification has increased among U.S. mutual funds. The author proposes two explanations for the decrease in skill: 1) growth in mutual fund assets has made it harder to outperform the market, and 2) funds have responded to demand by creating less informationally-content funds.
Business Finance Chapter 11 Risk and returnTinku Kumar
This chapter discusses predicting stock market returns and measuring risk. It introduces expected returns and standard deviation as measures of average return and risk. It then discusses how new, unexpected information can impact stock prices and returns. It also introduces beta as a measure of a stock's systematic, market risk. The chapter concludes by discussing the security market line and capital asset pricing model, which relate expected return and risk by establishing the market risk premium.
This report analyzes liability-driven investment strategies to hedge risks for pension funds. It first discusses the pension crisis and identifies key risks like shifting demographics, market volatility, and interest rates. It then models pension liabilities using actuarial assumptions and cash flow projections. Several hedging strategies are proposed, including duration matching with futures. Back-testing finds that combining corporate bond and long-term Treasury futures best hedges risks. The results suggest heavier weighting of corporate bonds and stocks for underfunded plans.
Security Analysis and Portfolio ManagementShrey Sao
Modern portfolio theory (MPT) provides a framework for constructing investment portfolios to maximize expected return based on a given level of market risk. MPT assumes investors aim to maximize returns for a given level of risk. It uses variance as a measure of risk and covariance to capture how asset returns move together. The efficient frontier graph shows the set of optimal portfolios that offer the highest expected return for a given level of risk. Individual investors select the portfolio on the efficient frontier that maximizes their utility based on their risk tolerance. MPT emphasizes diversification and the benefits of holding inefficiently priced assets.
Usse average internal rate of return (airr), don't use internal rate of retur...Futurum2
This is to document the email correspondences with Prof. Peter M. DeMarzo (Stanford University) and Prof. Carlo Alberto Magni with regards to Average Internal Rate of Return in Dec 2015.
The document discusses risk and return in investing. It explains that equity investments like stocks historically have higher average returns of over 10% compared to debt investments like bonds that return 3-4%, but stocks are also more volatile. It defines risk as the variability of returns, and introduces the concepts of systematic risk that affects all stocks equally and unsystematic risk that is specific to individual stocks. Diversification can reduce unsystematic risk but not systematic risk. It also discusses measuring market risk through a stock's beta value, which represents its volatility relative to the overall market.
The document discusses risk and rates of return, including stand-alone risk, portfolio risk, and the Capital Asset Pricing Model. It defines risk as the chance of an unfavorable outcome and discusses how risk is measured using concepts like standard deviation, beta, and the capital market line. Diversification across many assets or asset classes can reduce risk for a portfolio, though not below the market risk.
“Over” and “Under” Valued Financial Institutions: Evidence from a “Fair-Value...Ilias Lekkos
The aim of the study is to present our approach that allows us to evaluate relative over- and under-valuation of financial institutions based on the distance between their market-based price to book ratios and our estimated "fair-value" P/Bs.
This document summarizes a paper that examines the sustainability of pension schemes. It discusses challenges facing defined benefit pension schemes from poor market returns and low interest rates. It also discusses challenges for pay-as-you-go public pension schemes from lower tax revenues and rising fiscal deficits. The paper then presents an actuarial model to estimate costs of supporting occupational and public pension schemes under different assumptions. It analyzes how lower economic growth and aging populations could increase liabilities and contribution rates for pay-as-you-go schemes. Finally, it discusses challenges occupational plans may face from changes in pension accounting standards and derivatives market reforms.
Scenario generation and stochastic programming models for asset liabiltiy man...Nicha Tatsaneeyapan
This document discusses scenario generation methods for asset liability management models. It proposes a multi-stage stochastic programming model for a Dutch pension fund to determine optimal investment policies. Two methods for generating scenarios are explored: randomly sampled event trees and event trees that fit the mean and covariance of returns. Rolling horizon simulations are used to compare the performance of the stochastic programming approach to a fixed mix model. The results show that appropriately generated scenarios can significantly improve the performance of the stochastic programming model relative to the fixed mix benchmark.
This document presents an estimated arbitrage-free model that jointly models nominal and real US Treasury yields. It estimates separate arbitrage-free Nelson-Siegel models for nominal and real yields, finding a three-factor model fits nominal yields well and a two-factor model fits real yields. It then estimates a four-factor joint model that fits both yield curves. The joint model is used to decompose breakeven inflation rates into inflation expectations and inflation risk premium components.
Welcome to the fifth edition of Outline, Redington’s quarterly collection of thought-pieces designed to help institutional investors make smarter and more informed decisions.
This edition features short articles on the future of pensions policy, the complexities of running a pension scheme and how technology can help overcome them, risks inherent from gilt and swap rate differences, an outcome-driven approach to fund management, a review of asset classes in 2013, plus an overview of the global macro environment.
We hope you find the articles interesting and helpful as you consider how best to manage the risk-adjusted return of your portfolios
Market Theory, Capital Asset Pricing ModelKatie Gulley
Investment banks play an important role in capital markets by providing services to corporations and facilitating investment. They assist companies in raising capital through public offerings on stock exchanges or private placements. This process involves underwriting, wherein the investment bank takes on the risk of distributing securities if they cannot be sold. Investment banks also provide mergers and acquisitions advisory services to corporations. Their deep expertise in valuation and financing allows investment banks to effectively advise clients on major transactions.
· Respond to 3 posts listed below. Advance the conversation; provi.docxLynellBull52
· Respond to 3 posts listed below. Advance the conversation; provide a real-world application and experiential examples;
· Conceptually discuss your key [most significant] learning insight or take-away from the selected forum topic comments.
· Responses should be a minimum of 150-250 words, supported by at least one reference outside of the textbook (use academic journals), either supporting or refuting the position of the author of the forum topic response or peer response.
Topic #1: The Cost of Capital
The cost of capital refers to the “cost” a company must incur in order to use funds towards a new project or investment. The funds may come from lenders by borrowing the funds, by financing equity, or by selling bonds or assets. The cost of capital is expressed as an annual interest rate that the company will be charged on the capital funds. Therefore, this is the minimum return a company must be striving for when undertaking a new project, making a purchase, or making an investment. Otherwise, they are simply losing money.
The cost of capital is used as the minimum rate of return that the project must achieve and is also the rate that is used in a discounted cash flow analysis. If the return of future net cash flows on an investment or project are greater than the cost of capital, then the investment or project is worthwhile to the business. For example, if a project generates a return of 20% and the cost of capital was estimated at 15%, then this project has added value to the business.
In addition, the NPV formula can be used to compare multiple projects using different costs of capital. For instance, Project A and Project B compared by using 10%, 15%, and 20% costs of capital. This can allow businesses to see how investing more or less capital would affect the outcome of the NPV. Just as you can compare these different costs of capital, you can also add the element of risk into your calculations by increasing the cost of capital to reflect a riskier project or investment. Very simply put, if investment B is riskier than investment A, then you could compare them with B having a cost of capital at r = 15% and A having a cost of capital at r= 10% - therefore adjusting for one project/investment being riskier than the other.
Interestingly, there has been much discussion and debate over how companies set their cost of capital rates. In the case of large Fortune 500 companies, they spend hundreds of billions of dollars per year. If they miscalculate the cost of capital rate on an investment or project with a difference of even 1%, this could mean a gain or loss of billions of dollars depending on which way the value was incorrectly estimated. For example, if a company plans to invest $52 million dollars into a new project that is estimated to bring in $10.5 million per year over the next seven years, and the company incorrectly estimates the cost of capital by 1%, then you can see by the table below the affect this small percentage pot.
This document summarizes a research paper that develops a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model to explain how monetary policy affects risk in financial markets and the macroeconomy. The key feature of the model is that asset and goods markets are segmented because it is costly for households to transfer funds between the markets. The model generates endogenous movements in risk as the fraction of households that rebalance their portfolios varies over time in response to real and monetary shocks. Simulation results indicate the model can account for evidence that monetary policy easing reduces equity premiums and helps explain the response of stock prices to monetary shocks.
The document discusses various capital budgeting techniques. It defines net present value and internal rate of return, and discusses how they can sometimes provide contradictory results. It also provides short notes on certainty equivalent approach and sensitivity analysis, explaining how they handle risk in capital budgeting. Social cost benefit analysis is discussed in the context of evaluating industrial projects. The document also covers other topics like project appraisal under inflation, capital rationing, zero date of a project, simulation analysis, and the key contents of a project report.
Accounting Research Center, Booth School of Business, Universi.docxnettletondevon
Accounting Research Center, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago
Comparing the Accuracy and Explainability of Dividend, Free Cash Flow, and Abnormal
Earnings Equity Value Estimates
Author(s): Jennifer Francis, Per Olsson and Dennis R. Oswald
Source: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 38, No. 1 (Spring, 2000), pp. 45-70
Published by: Wiley on behalf of Accounting Research Center, Booth School of Business,
University of Chicago
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2672922
Accessed: 11-09-2016 22:17 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact [email protected]
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
Accounting Research Center, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Wiley
are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Accounting Research
This content downloaded from 198.246.186.26 on Sun, 11 Sep 2016 22:17:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Journal of Accounting Research
Vol. 38 No. 1 Spring 2000
Printed in US.A.
Comparing the Accuracy and
Explainability of Dividend, Free
Cash Flow, and Abnormal Earnings
Equity Value Estimates
JENNIFER FRANCIS,* PER OLSSON,t
AND DENNIS R. OSWALD:
1. Introduction
This study provides empirical evidence on the reliability of intrinsic
value estimates derived from three theoretically equivalent valuation
models: the discounted dividend (DIV) model, the discounted free cash
flow (FCO) model, and the discounted abnormal earnings (AE) model.
We use Value Line (VL) annual forecasts of the elements in these models
to calculate value estimates for a sample of publicly traded firms fol-
lowed by Value Line during 1989-93.1 We contrast the reliability of value
*Duke University; tUniversity of Wisconsin; London Business School. This research
was supported by the Institute of Professional Accounting and the Graduate School of
Business at the University of Chicago, by the Bank Research Institute, Sweden, and Jan
Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse for Samhallsvetenskaplig Forskning, Stockholm,
Sweden. We appreciate the comments and suggestions of workshop participants at the
1998 EAA meetings, Berkeley, Harvard, London Business School, London School of Eco-
nomics, NYU, Ohio State, Portland State, Rochester, Stockholm School of Economics,
Tilburg, and Wisconsin, and from Peter Easton, Frank Gigler, Paul Healy, Thomas Hem-
mer, Joakim Levin, Mark Mitchell, Krishna Palepu, Stephen Penman, Richard Ruback,
Linda Vincent, Terry Warfield, and Jerry Zimmerman.
I We collect third-quarter annual forecast data over a five-year .
Optimal Portfolio Selection for a Defined Contribution Pension Fund with Retu...BRNSS Publication Hub
This paper investigates the optimal investment strategies for a defined contribution pension fund with return clauses of premiums with interest under the mean-variance criterion. Using the actuarial symbol, we formalize the problem as a continuous time mean-variance stochastic optimal control. The pension fund manager considers investments in risk and risk-free assets to increase the remaining accumulated funds to meet the retirement needs of the remaining members. Using the variational inequalities methods, we established an optimized problem from the extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman Equations and solved the optimized problem to obtain the optimal investment strategies for both risk-free and risky assets and also the efficient frontier of the pension member. Furthermore, we evaluated analytically and numerically the effect of various parameters of the optimal investment strategies on it. We observed that the optimal investment strategy for the risky asset decreases with an increase in the risk-averse level, initial wealth, and the predetermined interest rate.
This document summarizes a research article that investigates optimal investment strategies for a defined contribution pension fund with return clauses for premiums paid with a predetermined interest rate under a mean-variance framework. The researchers develop a continuous-time stochastic optimal control model to formalize the problem. They obtain the optimal investment strategies for risk-free and risky assets by solving the extended Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations using variational inequality methods. The optimal strategies are affected by parameters like risk aversion, initial wealth, and interest rate.
This document presents research on optimal portfolio selection for a defined contribution pension fund. It considers investments in risk-free and risky assets to maximize the remaining accumulated funds for retirement. Using variational inequality methods, the researchers establish an optimized problem from the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations and solve it to obtain the optimal investment strategies. They find that the optimal investment in the risky asset decreases with increases in risk aversion, initial wealth, and the predetermined interest rate. The researchers also evaluate the effect of various parameters on the optimal investment strategies analytically and numerically.
1) The study examines the economic importance of accounting information by analyzing how accounting data from financial statements can improve portfolio optimization for US equities.
2) Using a parametric portfolio policy method, the researchers modeled portfolio weights as a linear function of three accounting characteristics - accruals, change in earnings, and asset growth - and compared it to weights based on size, book-to-market, and momentum.
3) They found that the accounting-based portfolio generated an out-of-sample annual information ratio of 1.9 compared to 1.5 for the price-based portfolio, indicating accounting information provides valuable signals for optimizing equity investments.
An emerging consensus
A consensus is developing around
these principles about what
ESG is, and the Global Reporting
Initiative’s guidelines further
formalise the process. Yet actual ESG
implementation and measurement
are far from uniform. Its subjective
nature leads to management issues,
with widespread outsourcing of stockfiltering
and ongoing monitoring.
Many asset owners are signing up
to existing ESG standards. US$59trn
in global assets are now covered by
the United Nation’s six Principles for
Responsible Investment (UNPRI).
There is some consultation beginning
around compliance, with the
potential to remove signatories that
have shown no practice change or
improvement outcomes with regard
to the UNPRI.
Asset owners are rethinking their investment strategies and governance models in response to regulatory changes and a low-yield environment. They are moving away from traditional asset class silos towards more holistic risk management across asset classes. This includes increasing allocations to more complex, illiquid assets. Both larger and smaller asset owners are evaluating whether to outsource or run investment strategies internally based on factors like control, expertise, and costs. Bringing some strategies in-house can help reduce costs but smaller funds often have fewer options due to challenges retaining specialized talent.
AIAR Winter 2015 - Henry Ma Adaptive Invest ApproachHenry Ma
This document discusses the shortcomings of modern portfolio theory and the efficient market hypothesis. It introduces an alternative framework called adaptive investment which adjusts portfolios based on changing economic and market conditions. Specifically, it discusses how the risk/return relationship breaks down when including more asset classes, how average returns and other parameters are unstable over time. It also discusses how traditional investment practices like buy-and-hold and benchmark-centric investing led to suboptimal outcomes for investors. The document proposes that an adaptive investment approach which adjusts to different market regimes may better help investors achieve their goals.
In this paper we propose a new risk management framework that can evaluate the cost-risk tradeoff of alternative risk management strategies. Although there is ample theoretical support for risk management as an activity, common risk management approaches suffer serious problems:
Minimize Risk: Completely eliminating risk is expensive and impractical
Efficient Frontier: Can eliminate many poor risk management strategies but rarely gives a definitive optimal
strategy
Sharpe Ratio: Provides a cost-risk trade-off but the price of one unit of risk is arbitrary
Based on a recent empirical study, we propose a new cost-risk measure which directly values the impact of earnings per share and cash flow per share volatility.
This new approach will enable corporate CFOs and treasurers to make more robust risk management decisions and, critically, better defend those decisions internally and to the broader market.
Revaluation accounting and decision usefulness of accounting ratiosAlexander Decker
This document discusses the limitations of using historical cost accounting and ratio analysis based on historical cost data. It argues that historical cost accounting does not reflect the current value of assets, which distorts key financial ratios used for decision making.
The document proposes that revaluation accounting, which adjusts fixed asset values to current market values, can address these limitations by providing more relevant information to ratio analysis. It reviews theories supporting revaluation accounting and identifies several key ratios impacted by historical cost distortions, such as return on capital employed.
The study examined the relationship between asset valuation methods and the usefulness of financial statements and ratios for decision making. It found that adjusting statements for revalued assets enhances ratio analysis and decision usefulness for information users.
Leonard is evaluating investment options for replacing an existing system. He performed a basic LCC analysis but wants to strengthen his analysis by accounting for uncertainties. A stochastic LCC analysis using Monte Carlo simulation can model uncertain inputs as distributions rather than single values. This allows Leonard to identify risks and see how robust his decision is to changes in inputs. The document discusses key statistical concepts needed to model inputs as distributions, including probability mass functions, cumulative distribution functions, means, modes and standard deviations. It also introduces a running example to illustrate applying these concepts to Leonard's investment problem.
11.do conditional and unconditional conservatism impactAlexander Decker
This document summarizes a research study that examined the impact of conditional and unconditional conservatism on earnings quality and stock prices in Egypt. The study used data from the largest 30 Egyptian listed firms from 2005 to 2009. The results suggest that (1) conditional conservatism negatively affects both earnings quality and stock prices, and (2) unconditional conservatism does not affect earnings quality but has a negative association with stock prices. This was the first study to test the impact of both types of conservatism on earnings quality and stock prices in the Egyptian context.
Similar to Retirement saving with contribution payments and labor income as a benchmark for investments (20)
How To Shift Consumer Behaviors to be more sustainable; a literature review a...Nicha Tatsaneeyapan
This article presents a literature review and framework for understanding how to shift consumer behaviors to be more sustainable. The framework is called SHIFT and proposes that consumers are more likely to engage in pro-environmental behaviors when messages or contexts leverage social influence, habit formation, individual identity, feelings and cognition, and tangibility. The review identified these five factors as the most common ways discussed in the literature to encourage sustainable consumption. The article then provides an in-depth discussion of each of these five factors and how they can shape consumer decision making and behaviors related to sustainability.
This document summarizes key aspects of data privacy protection based on a journal article. It discusses how data privacy can be achieved through technical and social solutions, as well as complying with relevant laws and regulations. International Data Privacy Principles are proposed that draw from standards in Asia, Europe, the US and internationally. Hong Kong's Personal Data Privacy Ordinance is used as an example, outlining its six data protection principles. Protecting data privacy is seen as urgent and complex due to issues like socio-techno risks from technology use and the need to balance various parameters in contractual agreements regarding data use.
Linkages between extreme stock market and currency returnsNicha Tatsaneeyapan
1) The document investigates the empirical link between extreme events in local stock and currency markets for 26 countries using daily return data from 1996-2005.
2) Preliminary results show that in some emerging markets, an extreme stock market decline increased the probability of an extreme currency depreciation on the same day.
3) For currency markets, there is evidence of spillover of extreme events within regions, but limited influence across regions. Extreme events in stock markets are more globally interconnected, especially when originating from the US.
The document discusses how incentive fees and a hedge fund manager's personal investment in the fund affect the manager's risk-taking behavior. It presents a theoretical model analyzing how loss-averse managers, as described by prospect theory, will increase risk when incentive fees are higher in order to maximize the chance of earning those fees. However, risk-taking is reduced when the manager has a substantial personal investment (at least 30%) in the fund. The document then empirically tests these predictions using data on hedge funds and funds of funds, finding support for higher risk-taking being positively related to incentive fee levels.
This document discusses a study that examines how loss aversion affects household portfolio choices. The study uses survey data from Dutch households that includes direct measures of each household's loss aversion coefficient, derived from questions involving hypothetical payoffs. The study finds that higher loss aversion is associated with a lower probability of participating in equity markets. It also finds that higher loss aversion reduces the probability of direct stockholding more than the probability of owning mutual funds. After controlling for other factors, the study does not find a significant relationship between loss aversion and portfolio allocations.
Estimating ambiguity preferences and perceptions in multiple prior models: Ev...Nicha Tatsaneeyapan
The document presents research estimating ambiguity preferences and perceptions using a multiple prior model. Key findings include:
1) The α-MaxMin model best explains choices under ambiguity, with one parameter (α) measuring ambiguity aversion and another (δ) quantifying perceived ambiguity.
2) On average, Americans are slightly ambiguity averse (α=0.56), but perceptions of ambiguity vary (δ=0.40).
3) Ambiguity aversion is more common for moderate-high likelihood gains, but ambiguity seeking prevails for low likelihoods and losses.
The document proposes a smooth transition model for forecasting housing markets that allows the weights assigned to short-term positive serial correlation and long-term mean reversion to fundamental values to vary dynamically over time. It estimates the model using US national house price index data from 1960 to 2012. The results show the switching mechanism significantly improves the in-sample fit and the model performs better than benchmark models in out-of-sample forecasting.
Early Warning Systems for Currency Crises: A Multivariate Extreme Value Appr...Nicha Tatsaneeyapan
This document summarizes a study that applies multivariate extreme value theory to test whether extreme exchange rate movements are associated with extreme movements in lagged macroeconomic variables. The study finds that nearly all fundamental variables have no relation with extreme exchange rate returns, except for the real interest rate. The probability of a currency crisis occurring within 12 months of a positive extreme real interest rate value is estimated to be 30%. Existing early warning systems for currency crises may perform poorly out of sample because they do not account for the tail dependence between variables.
This document presents a theoretical and empirical study of how incentives affect risk taking in hedge funds. The theoretical section develops a model to analyze how incentive fees and a manager's personal investment in the fund impact the manager's risk preferences under prospect theory. It finds that incentive fees reduce implicit loss aversion and increase risk taking, while a manager's own investment increases loss aversion and reduces risk taking. The empirical section analyzes a large hedge fund database and finds funds with incentive fees have higher downside risk and lower average returns than funds without such fees.
The effect of VaR-based risk management on asset prices and the volatility s...Nicha Tatsaneeyapan
This document summarizes a research paper that investigates the effects of Value-at-Risk (VaR) based risk management on asset prices and option prices. The key points are:
1) The authors build an economic model to study how VaR constraints affect stock and option markets. They find that VaR constraints generally reduce stock market volatility but can sometimes increase risks of extreme losses.
2) Option prices in the model display a "volatility smile" where implied volatilities are higher for out of the money options, consistent with real world markets.
3) VaR constraints are similar to the optimal investment strategies of loss-averse investors, who try to limit losses but take risks once losses
The document presents a model selection rule for combining exchange rate forecasts from multiple fundamental models. The rule uses backward elimination regression to select a small set of models based on their recent out-of-sample forecasting performance. This allows the weights on different fundamentals to vary over time, consistent with theories of time-varying relationships between exchange rates and fundamentals under model uncertainty. Out-of-sample tests show the combined forecasts from this dynamic rule significantly outperform a random walk for 5 of 10 currencies and yield meaningful investment profits.
HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING FOR ASSET-LIABILITY MANAGEMENTNicha Tatsaneeyapan
This article discusses using high-performance computing to solve very large asset-liability management problems formulated as stochastic programs. The authors solved a model for a Dutch pension fund with over 4.8 million scenarios, 12.5 million constraints and 25 million variables, which is the largest stochastic linear program ever solved. Specialized model generation and decomposition methods were key to tackling problems of this size. Results showed the initial optimal asset mix stabilized for larger models, demonstrating potential benefits of high-performance computing for asset-liability management.
Endogenous Price Bubbles in a Multi-Agent System of the Housing MarketNicha Tatsaneeyapan
This research article presents a multi-agent model of the US housing market that can endogenously produce boom-bust cycles. The model includes fundamentalist and chartist agents who switch between forecasting rules based on recent performance. When estimated with US housing price data from 1960-2014, the model fits the data well and can generate bubbles and crashes without external shocks. This suggests trading between heterogeneous agents alone can cause major price swings absent fundamental changes.
Comparisons of Foreign Multinationals and Local Firms in Asian Manufacturing...Nicha Tatsaneeyapan
This document summarizes a paper that compares economic characteristics of foreign multinational corporations (MNCs) and local firms in five Asian countries over time. The paper finds that foreign MNCs generally had larger shares of exports but smaller shares of employment and production compared to local firms. Foreign MNCs also tended to have higher labor productivity, capital productivity, capital intensity, profit rates, and import/export levels. Differences between wholly foreign and partially foreign firms, and between MNCs from different home countries, were also statistically significant in many cases. The paper aims to provide a quantitative analysis of differences between foreign and local firms in Asian manufacturing over time.
MNEs paid higher wages than local plants in Malaysian manufacturing. After accounting for differences in worker characteristics like education and occupation between MNEs and locals, as well as plant characteristics, MNEs still paid 5-9% more on average. The wage differential was positive and statistically significant for MNEs compared to locals in several key industries like food, chemicals, machinery, and electronics, even after controlling for other factors. However, the size of the differential varied between industries and samples.
Variations in human resource management in asian countries mnc home country a...Nicha Tatsaneeyapan
This document summarizes a research paper that investigates the determinants of human resource management (HRM) strategies used by firms operating in Korea and Taiwan. The researchers measured firms' reliance on high-performance versus traditional HRM policies across areas like staffing, rewards, and employee autonomy. They hypothesized that indigenous firms would be more likely to use organic, high-performance strategies compared to multinational corporation (MNC) subsidiaries. MNC home country effects and host country effects were also examined. The researchers found pronounced differences in HRM strategies based on country of origin and between host countries. Organizational characteristics also impacted HRM strategy.
1) The document examines how central banks balance inflation/output targets with costly sterilization of capital inflows. When sterilization costs rise, central banks limit sterilization, allowing exchange rates to adjust.
2) Empirical tests on developing countries from 1984-1992 confirm monetary policy responds to higher sterilization costs by allowing greater exchange rate changes. However, other model predictions have mixed results depending on how endogeneity is treated.
3) A theoretical model shows that higher sterilization costs are incorporated into central bank decisions as they impact the consolidated public sector budget constraint. This leads central banks to limit sterilization and tolerate more exchange rate movement.
Comparisons of Foreign Multinationals and Local Firms in Asian Manufacturing...Nicha Tatsaneeyapan
This document summarizes a paper that compares economic characteristics of foreign multinational corporations (MNCs) and local firms in five Asian countries over time. The paper finds that foreign MNCs generally had larger shares of exports but smaller shares of employment and production compared to local firms. Foreign MNCs also tended to have higher labor productivity, capital productivity, capital intensity, profit rates, and import/export levels. Differences between wholly foreign and partially foreign firms, and between MNCs from different home countries, were also statistically significant in many cases. The paper aims to provide a quantitative analysis of differences between foreign and local firms in Asian manufacturing over time.
Independent Study - College of Wooster Research (2023-2024) FDI, Culture, Glo...AntoniaOwensDetwiler
"Does Foreign Direct Investment Negatively Affect Preservation of Culture in the Global South? Case Studies in Thailand and Cambodia."
Do elements of globalization, such as Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), negatively affect the ability of countries in the Global South to preserve their culture? This research aims to answer this question by employing a cross-sectional comparative case study analysis utilizing methods of difference. Thailand and Cambodia are compared as they are in the same region and have a similar culture. The metric of difference between Thailand and Cambodia is their ability to preserve their culture. This ability is operationalized by their respective attitudes towards FDI; Thailand imposes stringent regulations and limitations on FDI while Cambodia does not hesitate to accept most FDI and imposes fewer limitations. The evidence from this study suggests that FDI from globally influential countries with high gross domestic products (GDPs) (e.g. China, U.S.) challenges the ability of countries with lower GDPs (e.g. Cambodia) to protect their culture. Furthermore, the ability, or lack thereof, of the receiving countries to protect their culture is amplified by the existence and implementation of restrictive FDI policies imposed by their governments.
My study abroad in Bali, Indonesia, inspired this research topic as I noticed how globalization is changing the culture of its people. I learned their language and way of life which helped me understand the beauty and importance of cultural preservation. I believe we could all benefit from learning new perspectives as they could help us ideate solutions to contemporary issues and empathize with others.
OJP data from firms like Vicinity Jobs have emerged as a complement to traditional sources of labour demand data, such as the Job Vacancy and Wages Survey (JVWS). Ibrahim Abuallail, PhD Candidate, University of Ottawa, presented research relating to bias in OJPs and a proposed approach to effectively adjust OJP data to complement existing official data (such as from the JVWS) and improve the measurement of labour demand.
Optimizing Net Interest Margin (NIM) in the Financial Sector (With Examples).pdfshruti1menon2
NIM is calculated as the difference between interest income earned and interest expenses paid, divided by interest-earning assets.
Importance: NIM serves as a critical measure of a financial institution's profitability and operational efficiency. It reflects how effectively the institution is utilizing its interest-earning assets to generate income while managing interest costs.
An accounting information system (AIS) refers to tools and systems designed for the collection and display of accounting information so accountants and executives can make informed decisions.
Economic Risk Factor Update: June 2024 [SlideShare]Commonwealth
May’s reports showed signs of continued economic growth, said Sam Millette, director, fixed income, in his latest Economic Risk Factor Update.
For more market updates, subscribe to The Independent Market Observer at https://blog.commonwealth.com/independent-market-observer.
The Rise and Fall of Ponzi Schemes in America.pptxDiana Rose
Ponzi schemes, a notorious form of financial fraud, have plagued America’s investment landscape for decades. Named after Charles Ponzi, who orchestrated one of the most infamous schemes in the early 20th century, these fraudulent operations promise high returns with little or no risk, only to collapse and leave investors with significant losses. This article explores the nature of Ponzi schemes, notable cases in American history, their impact on victims, and measures to prevent falling prey to such scams.
Understanding Ponzi Schemes
A Ponzi scheme is an investment scam where returns are paid to earlier investors using the capital from newer investors, rather than from legitimate profit earned. The scheme relies on a constant influx of new investments to continue paying the promised returns. Eventually, when the flow of new money slows down or stops, the scheme collapses, leaving the majority of investors with substantial financial losses.
Historical Context: Charles Ponzi and His Legacy
Charles Ponzi is the namesake of this deceptive practice. In the 1920s, Ponzi promised investors in Boston a 50% return within 45 days or 100% return in 90 days through arbitrage of international reply coupons. Initially, he paid returns as promised, not from profits, but from the investments of new participants. When his scheme unraveled, it resulted in losses exceeding $20 million (equivalent to about $270 million today).
Notable American Ponzi Schemes
1. Bernie Madoff: Perhaps the most notorious Ponzi scheme in recent history, Bernie Madoff’s fraud involved $65 billion. Madoff, a well-respected figure in the financial industry, promised steady, high returns through a secretive investment strategy. His scheme lasted for decades before collapsing in 2008, devastating thousands of investors, including individuals, charities, and institutional clients.
2. Allen Stanford: Through his company, Stanford Financial Group, Allen Stanford orchestrated a $7 billion Ponzi scheme, luring investors with fraudulent certificates of deposit issued by his offshore bank. Stanford promised high returns and lavish lifestyle benefits to his investors, which ultimately led to a 110-year prison sentence for the financier in 2012.
3. Tom Petters: In a scheme that lasted more than a decade, Tom Petters ran a $3.65 billion Ponzi scheme, using his company, Petters Group Worldwide. He claimed to buy and sell consumer electronics, but in reality, he used new investments to pay off old debts and fund his extravagant lifestyle. Petters was convicted in 2009 and sentenced to 50 years in prison.
4. Eric Dalius and Saivian: Eric Dalius, a prominent figure behind Saivian, a cashback program promising high returns, is under scrutiny for allegedly orchestrating a Ponzi scheme. Saivian enticed investors with promises of up to 20% cash back on everyday purchases. However, investigations suggest that the returns were paid using new investments rather than legitimate profits. The collapse of Saivian l
KYC Compliance: A Cornerstone of Global Crypto Regulatory FrameworksAny kyc Account
This presentation explores the pivotal role of KYC compliance in shaping and enforcing global regulations within the dynamic landscape of cryptocurrencies. Dive into the intricate connection between KYC practices and the evolving legal frameworks governing the crypto industry.
University of North Carolina at Charlotte degree offer diploma Transcripttscdzuip
办理美国UNCC毕业证书制作北卡大学夏洛特分校假文凭定制Q微168899991做UNCC留信网教留服认证海牙认证改UNCC成绩单GPA做UNCC假学位证假文凭高仿毕业证GRE代考如何申请北卡罗莱纳大学夏洛特分校University of North Carolina at Charlotte degree offer diploma Transcript
Discover the Future of Dogecoin with Our Comprehensive Guidance36 Crypto
Learn in-depth about Dogecoin's trajectory and stay informed with 36crypto's essential and up-to-date information about the crypto space.
Our presentation delves into Dogecoin's potential future, exploring whether it's destined to skyrocket to the moon or face a downward spiral. In addition, it highlights invaluable insights. Don't miss out on this opportunity to enhance your crypto understanding!
https://36crypto.com/the-future-of-dogecoin-how-high-can-this-cryptocurrency-reach/
New Visa Rules for Tourists and Students in Thailand | Amit Kakkar Easy VisaAmit Kakkar
Discover essential details about Thailand's recent visa policy changes, tailored for tourists and students. Amit Kakkar Easy Visa provides a comprehensive overview of new requirements, application processes, and tips to ensure a smooth transition for all travelers.
New Visa Rules for Tourists and Students in Thailand | Amit Kakkar Easy Visa
Retirement saving with contribution payments and labor income as a benchmark for investments
1. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase
Retirement saving with contribution payments and
labor income as a benchmark for investments
Arjan Berkelaara, Roy Kouwenbergb; ∗
aWorld Bank, Pension Fund, Washington, DC, USA
bAEGON Asset Management and Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 202, 2501 CE,
The Hague, Netherlands
Abstract
In this paper we study the retirement saving problem from the point of view of a plan
sponsor, who makes contribution payments for the future retirement of an employee. The plan
sponsor considers the employee’s labor income as investment-benchmark in order to ensure the
continuation of consumption habits after retirement. We demonstrate that the demand for risky
assets increases at low wealth levels due to the contribution payments. We quantify the demand
for hedging against changes in wage growth and 4nd that it is relatively small. We show that
downside-risk measures increase risk-taking at both low and high levels of wealth. ? 2002
Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
JEL classi-cation: G11; G23
Keywords: Retirement saving; Optimal asset allocation; Discrete-time 4nance; Dynamic programming
1. Introduction
In this paper we study the problem of saving for retirement with contribution pay-
ments and labor income as a benchmark for investments. We consider the retirement
saving problem from the point of view of a plan sponsor. The plan sponsor makes
contribution payments to an investment fund in order to save for the future retirement
of an employee. The goal is to ensure that the employee can continue his consumption
pattern after retirement. As the consumption habits of the employee are related to his
This paper re:ects the personal views of the authors and not those of the World Bank. We are grateful
to Bart Oldenkamp and Ton Vorst for comments on an earlier version of this paper.
∗ Corresponding author. Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR
Rotterdam, Netherlands. Tel.: +31-70-3448089.
E-mail address: rkouwenberg@aegon.nl, kouwenberg@few.eur.nl (R. Kouwenberg).
0165-1889/02/$ - see front matter ? 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S0165-1889(02)00055-6
2. 1070 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
wages, the plan sponsor considers the labor income of the employee as a benchmark
for investments.
Clearly, the plan sponsor is not only concerned about the welfare of the employee and
also wants to minimize his contribution payments. We formalize this in a multi-period
retirement saving model, where the plan sponsor makes a trade-oG between the utility
of low contribution payments and the utility of high fund values at retirement, relative
to the labor income of the employee. The solution of the model reveals the optimal
dynamic investment strategy and the optimal funding policy of the plan sponsor.
The retirement saving model presented in this paper includes both a de4ned con-
tributions pension plan and a ‘4nal pay’ de4ned bene4ts plan as special cases. The
generality of the model allows us to circumvent the large diGerence in pension schemes
throughout the world: we focus on the core of the retirement saving problem. Clearly,
not every plan sponsor or pension fund considers labor income as a benchmark for
investments. However, we believe that it is in the interest of the employees to do so,
without any adverse consequences.
An important assumption throughout the paper is that the labor income of the em-
ployee cannot be replicated with the available assets: consequently, the 4nancial market
is incomplete. Moreover, we assume that the wage growth rate is partly predictable.
Given the basic model setup, we derive optimal decision rules by applying dynamic
programming. The optimal decision rules specify the asset weights and the contribution
payment as a function of the state variables (the wealth-to-income ratio and the wage
growth rate) and provide direct insight into the underlying problem.
We are particularly interested in the following issues, which are relevant for retire-
ment saving and have not been studied adequately in the literature yet
1. What is the magnitude of the demand for the hedge portfolio against random changes
of the wage growth rate?
2. What is the impact of contribution payments on the optimal asset allocation?
3. What is the optimal multi-period investment strategy for investment objectives based
on downside-risk measures, which are very popular in practice?
4. What is the eGect of an objective that assigns utility to a high fund value before
the retirement date (on top of utility at retirement)?
With our implementation of the dynamic programming algorithm we were able to
address these three main questions about optimal investment and funding in the retire-
ment saving model. The conclusions to be drawn from our analysis and computational
experiments are as follows:
1. Regardless of his utility function, the plan sponsor invests in a hedge portfolio
against random :uctuations of the employee’s labor income. The hedge portfolio
depends on the covariance of the asset returns with the wage growth rate. The
numerical results demonstrate that the correlation between asset returns and wage
growth has a substantial in:uence on portfolio composition. Dynamic adjustments
of the hedging strategy due to changes of the wage growth rate are relatively small.
2. Contribution payments change the optimal investment strategy considerably, even for
a plan sponsor with constant relative risk aversion over fund value. The portfolio
3. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1071
weights are no longer constant and there is a strong tendency to gamble at low
levels of wealth. We also 4nd that contribution payments lead to a strong investment
horizon eGect.
3. If a plan sponsor maximizes the expected fund value subject to a penalty on
downside-risk, then the optimal investment policy is to increase the weight of risky
assets at low levels of wealth. This gambling policy can be attributed to the property
of increasing relative risk aversion of the downside-risk objective.
4. Intertemporal measurement of utility over wealth reduces the gambling eGects due
to contribution payments considerably.
The insights gained from the basic retirement saving model studied in this paper may
help plan sponsors to formulate dynamic investment policies and choose reasonable
objectives. Furthermore, the optimal decision-rules derived here can be implemented
in simulation-based systems for ALM, where additional market imperfections such as
transaction costs could be added.
In order to place this paper in the literature, we could interpret the retirement saving
problem with labor income as an asset–liability management (ALM) problem. In the
literature many single-period ALM models have been studied (Sharpe and Tint, 1990;
Leibowitz et al., 1994). These models indicate that investors should take the correlation
between assets and liabilities into account, while deciding about the investment strategy.
However, saving for retirement typically involves a long-term investment goal, and
one-period models are, therefore, inappropriate due to stochastic opportunity sets and
non-myopic preferences.
There is a large stream of literature about the application of stochastic programming
methods for multi-period ALM (see Mulvey and Ziemba (1998) for an overview).
Stochastic programming models formulate an accurate answer to the question: how to
invest today, given optimal recourse in the future? However, the optimal policies do
not explicitly reveal the relation between the decisions and the state-variables. Our
main objective is to gain insight in optimal decision rules for portfolio choice and
funding in a simple micro-economic model without market imperfections.
Dynamic retirement saving problems have also been studied in the actuarial literature:
we refer to O’Brien (1987) for an early continuous-time formulation and Haberman and
Sung (1994) for a more recent discrete-time model. Haberman and Sung (1994) provide
a closed-form solution for a discrete-time pension model where the objective function
is to minimize the squared deviations from the target contribution rate, and the squared
deviations from the target funding ratio. The mathematical results of Haberman and
Sung (1994) are impressive but the approach can not be easily extended to objective
functions that are non-quadratic, or to problems with constraints on the policies, as
studied in this paper.
Due to the focus on dynamic programming and micro-economic analysis this paper
is also related to the individual consumption–investment literature (Mossin, 1968;
Hakansson, 1969; Samuelson, 1969). Our retirement saving model can be classi4ed
as a model with a stochastic opportunity set (predictable wage growth), with both
negative and positive consumption (the net contribution payment) and without a risk-
less asset (due to market incompleteness). Koo (1999) analyzes a simple discrete-time
4. 1072 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
model with labor income for power utility and has to apply numerical techniques to
solve it. As our model is more elaborate and as we additionally want to study more
general objectives than power utility, we clearly need a numerical solution method.
For the computation of the optimal investment policy we apply a dynamic program-
ming algorithm. We add several numerical improvements to the basic algorithm in order
to increase eOciency, including transformation and interpolation of the value function,
which facilitate the solution of investment models with power and HARA-utility. As
we apply dynamic programming, the optimal policies are derived in feedback form and
we acquire direct insight into the structure of the strategies. This paper can be placed
in a growing literature that solves consumption–investment problems numerically in
order to study the impact of relevant, but analytically complicated, issues such as pre-
dictability, transaction costs and parameter uncertainty (Brennan et al., 1997; Balduzzi
and Lynch, 1999; Barberis, 2000).
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the retirement saving
model and the main assumptions. Moreover, we review the literature and introduce
our implementation of the dynamic programming algorithm. In Section 3, we study the
optimal investment strategies in detail for diGerent investment objectives. We show that
the widely used class of downside-risk measures leads to peculiar investment policies in
a multi-period setting. In Section 4, we study the additional eGect of funding payments
on the investment strategy, while Section 5 considers horizon eGects and the impact of
utility over intertemporal fund value. Section 6 concludes and summarizes the paper.
2. Retirement saving model
2.1. Model de-nition and assumptions
In this section we introduce the model for retirement saving that will be studied in
this paper. We assume that a plan sponsor pays contributions in order to 4nance the
retirement of an employee at time T. The plan sponsor has established an investment
fund with initial wealth Wt at time t = 0 in order to achieve the retirement goal at the
planning horizon T. At the beginning of each period t =0; 1; : : : ; T −1 the plan sponsor
decides either to add a contribution payment of C+
t ¿ 0 to the fund or to extract cash
from the fund C−
t ¿ 0. We represent the net cash:ow into the fund by Ct = C+
t − C−
t .
After the cash in- and out:ows a total amount of (Wt + Ct) is left for investment in
the capital market. There are I + 1 assets available for investment in the economy at
time t, each providing a discretely compounded random return of Ri;t+1 at time t + 1
for i = 0; 1; : : : ; I. Each period the plan sponsor invests a fraction wit of the investment
fund’s wealth into asset i = 1; : : : ; I, while the remaining fraction (1 −
I
i=1 wi
t) is
invested in asset 0.
The investment goal of the plan sponsor is to enable the employee to continue his
consumption habits after retirement. As the employee’s consumption pattern is likely
to be related to his labor income, the plan sponsor considers the employee’s wages
at retirement IT as a benchmark for investments. We assume that the plan sponsor
measures wealth relative to the labor income of the employee and maximizes a utility
5. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1073
function U(FT ; T) over the relative fund value FT = WT =IT at retirement. The function
U(FT ; T) is increasing and concave in the fund value FT .
Additionally, the plan sponsor tries to minimize his contribution payments by max-
imizing the utility function V(−Ct; It; t) over the intertemporal payments Ct for t =
0; 1; : : : ; T − 1. The function V(: ; It; t) is increasing and concave in its 4rst argument.
Higher contribution payments therefore decrease the utility of the plan sponsor and in-
crease the marginal utility of a unit reduction in payments. We formalize the trade-oG
between fund value at retirement and contribution payments in the following retirement
saving (RS) model:
max
wit ;Ct
E0
T−1
t=0
V(−Ct; It; t) + U(WT =IT ; T)
; (1)
s:t: Wt+1 = (Wt + Ct)
I
i=1
wit(1 + Ri;t+1) +
1 −
I
i=1
wit
(1 + R0;t+1)
;
for t = 0; 1; : : : ; T − 1; (2)
where ¿ 0 is a parameter in:uencing the relative impact of utility over fund value
FT = WT =IT at retirement T.
The general model for retirement saving needs a more detailed speci4cation for a
meaningful analysis. As a 4rst building block, we will assume that the wage growth
rate t follows a mean-reverting process:
Assumption 1. Labor income It at time t grows with the continuously compounded
wage growth rate t+1; which follows a mean-reverting process
It+1 = Itet+1
= It(1 + t+1); (3)
Qt+1 = ( − t) + t+1; t+1 ∼ IID(0; 2
); (4)
where Qt+1 =t+1 −t; 0 ¡ ¡ 1 is the mean reversion parameter; is the long run
mean wage growth rate and t+1 is an identically intertemporal independently distributed
(IID) innovation with expectation zero and variance 2
. For ease of exposition we also
de4ne the discrete wage growth rate t+1 = et+1
− 1.
Secondly, we assume that the asset returns are not correlated intertemporally and
imperfectly correlated with the wage growth innovation:
Assumption 2. The joint distribution of the continuously compounded asset returns
ri;t+1 and the wage growth innovation t+1 is equal in each period t = 0; 1; : : : ; T − 1.
The vector of mean asset returns is = {i}I
i=0 and the covariance matrix is =
{ij}I
i;j=0. The correlation vector of the asset returns with the wage growth innovation
t+1 is denoted by I = {i}I
i=0. The asset returns are not correlated intertemporally:
Cov(ri;t+1; ri;t) = 0 for t = 0; 1; : : : ; T − 1. The discretely compounded asset return is
de4ned as Ri;t+1 = eri; t+1
− 1.
6. 1074 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
Assumption 2 implies that there is no direct compensation for wage growth in the
mean of the asset returns, although the returns can still be imperfectly correlated with
the wage growth rate. Consequently, this assumption entails that there is no perfect
hedge for wage in:ation: the -nancial market is incomplete.
Thirdly, we assume that the plan sponsor measures the utility of a contribution
payment Ct relative to employee’s wage income It at time t.
Assumption 3. The utility V over contribution payments is a function of time and the
ratio Ct=It only: V(−Ct; It; t) = H(−Ct=It; t). We de4ne ct = Ct=It as the contribution
rate relative to the employee’s labor income.
Assumption 3 allows us to reduce the state space of the retirement saving problem
from three variables (wealth Wt, income It and wage growth t) to two variables (the
wealth–income ratio Ft and wage growth t). As a result the eGort needed for solving
the model reduces signi4cantly. In our opinion this reduction of complexity makes up
for the slight loss of generality. Moreover, the assumption of utility over contribution
rates is also made by Boender (1997) in a widely used decision support system for
pension funds.
In practice, pension schemes are often categorized as either a de4ned contributions
plan or a de4ned bene4ts plan. We would like to point out that our retirement saving
model can include both schemes as special cases. If we 4x the contribution payments
Ct at a constant non-negative level, then we replicate a de4ned contributions scheme.
The retirement saving model also includes a ‘4nal pay’ de4ned bene4ts scheme, where
the plan sponsor guarantees to pay M times the employee’s labor income at retirement
(i.e. MIT ). 1
In the next sections we will discuss solution methods for the retirement
saving model.
2.2. Dynamic programming and -rst-order conditions
A well-known solution technique for sequential decision problems under uncertainty
is dynamic programming (see Bellman, 1957; Bertsekas, 1976). It is based on the
observation that an optimal policy for the entire sequential decision problem should
also be optimal starting from any given state at a later date. This property is known as
the principle of optimality. Given Assumptions 1–3, we can describe the state of the
retirement fund at time t completely with the relative fund value Ft = Wt=It and the
wage growth rate t. Let the value function J(Ft; t; t) denote the maximum expected
utility obtainable for the plan sponsor starting at time t in state (Ft; t):
J(Ft; t; t) = max
wit ;ct
Et
T−1
j=t
H(cj; j) + U(FT ; T)
; (5)
1 In order to guarantee MIT at retirement, the plan sponsor either has to pay an additional amount of
C+
T = max{0; MIT − WT } or he receives the redundant fund value C−
T = max{0; WT − MIT }. Suppose that
the plan sponsor maximizes a utility function H(cT ; T) over the 4nal contribution rate cT =(MIT −WT )=IT =
M − FT . We can model this equivalently with a utility function U(FT ; T) over 4nal fund value FT , as in
the objective (1) of the retirement saving model.
7. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1075
s:t: Ft+1 = (Ft + ct)
I
i=1
wit
(1 + Ri;t+1)
(1 + t+1)
+
1 −
I
i=1
wit
(1 + R0;t+1)
(1 + t+1)
for t = 0; 1; : : : ; T − 1: (6)
The plan sponsor’s initial planning problem is de4ned by J(F0; 0; 0). Using the princi-
ple of optimality, the dynamic programming algorithm derives this function recursively
by solving the following sequence of one-period problems:
J(Ft; t; t) = max
wit ;ct
{H(ct; t) + Et[J(Ft+1; t+1; t + 1)]}; (7)
s:t: Ft+1 = (Ft + ct)
I
i=1
wit
(1 + Ri;t+1)
(1 + t+1)
+
1 −
I
i=1
wit
(1 + R0;t+1)
(1 + t+1)
;
for t = 0; 1; : : : ; T − 1; (8)
where J(FT ; T ; T) = U(FT ; T).
2.3. Implementation of the discretized dynamic programming algorithm
In general, it is not easy to 4nd closed-form expressions for the optimal policies
that maximize (7) and in most cases numerical methods are required. We apply a
numerical solution technique that is based on a discretization of the state space, i.e.
a grid for the values of the state variables Ft and t. For each point on this grid we
solve the dynamic programming equation (7) numerically for the optimal investment
and funding decisions. Note that the required computations easily get out of hand, as
the expectation of next period’s value function has to be integrated numerically. An
additional complicating factor is the curse of dimensionality: the size of the state grid
grows exponentially with the number of state variables.
Our implementation of the discretized dynamic programming algorithm uses four
numerical techniques that increase the eOciency of the method:
1. Variance reduction techniques in order to improve Monte-Carlo simulations.
2. Interpolation of the value function in order to reduce the size of the grid.
3. Transformation of the value function in order to facilitate interpolation methods.
4. Fast numerical optimizations using restarts from neighboring grid points.
More information on the implementation of the algorithm can be found in Appendix
A. The largest model solved in the paper has two state variables (wage growth, fund
value) and 10 periods: we use a three-dimensional grid with 17 × 36 × 11 = 6; 732
points to discretize the state space. The algorithm required 20; 501 s (about 5:7 h) to
solve the problem on a Pentium 200 desktop PC with 64 Mb of memory.
In practice pension funds might want to consider even larger models in order to
add more speci4c details about their planning problem, such as the liabilities and
actuarial risk. The computational requirements for solving a more complex model will
8. 1076 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
de4nitely increase, however, we would like to point out that the dynamic programming
algorithm is suited very well for parallel computations. Nowadays most companies
have a network of desktop and mainframe computers, which could easily be used for
parallel computations. We refer to Zenios (1999) for a discussion and an overview of
the applications of parallel and high-performance computing in 4nance.
3. Investment policies for retirement saving
3.1. Portfolio separation and liability hedging credits
We try to gain insight in the optimal policies of the retirement saving model by
analysing diGerent parts in isolation. In this section we focus on optimal investment
policies in a model without contribution payments, while in Section 4 we will in-
vestigate the additional eGect of funding decisions. Throughout the following sections
we will assume that the discrete asset returns and the wage growth are log-normally
distributed.
Assumption 4. The joint distribution of the continuously compounded asset returns
ri;t+1 and the wage growth innovation t+1 is multi-variate normal in each period t =
0; 1; : : : ; T − 1; with a constant mean vector and a constant covariance matrix (see
Assumption 2). Consequently; the discrete returns (1 + Ri;t+1) = eri; t+1
and the discrete
wage growth (1 + i;t+1) = et+1
follow a multi-variate log-normal distribution.
We 4rst pay attention to the general structure of the investment strategies. The corre-
lation of the asset returns with the wage growth rate is very important for investments
in the retirement saving model, as it drives the hedging demand for assets against
changes in the wage growth rate. We can observe this in the general fund separation
result of Merton (1971). In order to derive fund separation for our discrete-time re-
tirement saving model we have to apply a linear approximation of the continuously
compounded returns and we have to assume that asset 0 is riskless, leading to the
following result:
w∗
t = −
Et[JF ]
FtEt[JFF ]
−1
( − !r0) +
1 −
Et[JF]
FtE[JFF ]
−1
I; (9)
where w∗
t is the vector of optimal portfolio weights. The proof is omitted to save space,
but available on request from the authors.
The optimal asset weights of the plan sponsor can be separated into a market port-
folio, a hedge portfolio for the wage growth rate and a riskless portfolio. Note that the
second part of the portfolio, involving I, represents the intertemporal hedge against
changes of the wage growth rate. Typically, an investor will increase the weight of an
asset if it has a higher covariance I with the wage growth rate. This eGect is related
to the concept of liability hedging credits, introduced by Sharpe and Tint (1990): the
investor is willing to accept a lower expected return on assets that provide a partial
hedge against changes in the value of the liabilities.
9. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1077
3.2. Hedging demand under constant relative risk aversion
The portfolio separation result holds for any investment objective, but it does not
provide a complete solution as the investment rule depends on the unknown value
function J(Ft; t; t). In order to learn more about the optimal investment strategies we
will 4rst consider the case of constant relative risk aversion. We assume that the plan
sponsor maximizes a power utility function over the relative fund value FT at the
retirement date T:
U(FT ; T) = (1 + )−T 1
#
(FT )#
; (10)
RU
(FT ; T) =
−FT UFF (FT ; T)
UF (FT ; T)
= 1 − #; (11)
where # ¡ 1 is the relative risk aversion coeOcient and ¿ 0 is the intertemporal
discount factor.
The function RU
(FT ; T) in (11) is the Arrow–Pratt measure of relative risk aversion,
which is constant for power utility. In a simple investment model with one risky asset
and one riskless asset the portfolio weight of the risky asset increases (decreases) as a
function of wealth, if the relative risk aversion is decreasing (increasing) in wealth. An
investor with constant relative risk aversion does not change the risky asset weight.
We can derive a similar result for the retirement saving model with a power utility
function (10) as objective, under the assumption of zero contribution rates ct = 0 for
t = 0; 1; : : : ; T − 1:
dw∗
it
dFt
= 0 and
dw∗
it
dt
= 0 for t = 0; 1; : : : ; T − 1 and i = 0; 1; : : : ; I; (12)
where w∗
it denotes the optimal asset weight for i = 0; 1; : : : ; I. The proof is omitted to
save space, but available on request from the authors.
3.3. Hedging demand under decreasing relative risk aversion
We conclude from (12) that the plan sponsor does not adjust the portfolio weights
if the fund value or the wage growth changes, in the case with a CRRA objective and
without intertemporal contribution payments. We will now study utility functions with
decreasing relative risk aversion (DRRA), in order to investigate whether the optimal
investment strategies are indeed diGerent. We introduce the following class of utility
functions with DRRA, which can be applied in our economy without causing feasibility
problems: 2
U(FT ; T) = (1 + )−T
1
# − p
F−p
T +
%
#
F#
T ; (13)
2 HARA-utility functions with a positive sustenance level ¿ 0 also have the property of DRRA, however,
we cannot apply them in our incomplete market as they would cause bankruptcy problems (the constraint
Ft ¿ of the HARA-utility function cannot be satis4ed under all circumstances).
10. 1078 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Wealth-Income Ratio
Relative
Risk-Aversion
Fig. 1. Relative risk aversion function for DRRA. This 4gure shows the Arrow–Pratt measure of relative
risk aversion (14) of utility function (13) as a function of the wealth–income ratio F, for parameter values
# = −0:5, p = 3 and % = 3.
RU
(F; T) = −FT
UFF (FT ; T)
UF (FT ; T)
=
(1 − # + p) + (1 − #)%Fp
T
1 + %Fp
T
; (14)
where # ¡ 1, p ¿ 0 and % ¿ 0 are constant parameters. It is easy to prove that
UF (FT ; T) ¿ 0, UFF (FT ; T) ¡ 0 and RU
F (FT ; T) ¡ 0 hold: U is a utility function with
DRRA.
If FT is close to zero then the relative risk aversion coeOcient equals (1 − # + p),
while it decreases monotonically to (1 − #) as the fund value increases to in4nity.
Hence, (1 − #) is the minimum relative risk aversion coeOcient, while p measures the
maximum increase in risk aversion that occurs as the investor becomes less wealthy.
Finally, the parameter % determines the rate at which risk aversion decreases from
(1 − # + p) to (1 − #), as wealth grows. Fig. 1 shows a graph of the relative risk
aversion function (14) for the parameter values # = −0:5, p = 3 and % = 3. These
parameter values imply a decrease of relative risk aversion from 4:5 to 1:5.
We would like to investigate the impact of DRRA on optimal investment strate-
gies, however analytical solutions are not readily available under this particular utility
speci4cation and therefore we rely on our numerical method. First, we specify the
coeOcients that will be used in all numerical examples from now on.
Assumption 5. For the numerical cases we consider a retirement fund 10 years before
the retirement date; i.e. T = 10. The discount rate is 2% per year. The initial wealth
of the fund is W0 = 1 and the initial labor income of the employee is I0 = 1. At the
11. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1079
beginning of each period t=0; 1; : : : ; T −1 the plan sponsor can adjust the asset portfolio
of the retirement fund. Two assets are available for investing; a risky bond and a risky
stock. There is no riskless asset and short selling is not allowed. Consequently; the
asset weights of the bond and the stock are within 0% and 100%. The asset returns
are jointly log-normally distributed with expected returns B =6:8% and S =8:6% for
the bond and the stock; respectively; standard deviations B =5:9% and S =15:7% and
a correlation of BS = +0:38. The long run mean wage growth rate is = 5:7% ; the
mean reversion parameter equals = 0:31 and the standard deviation is = 3%. We
will make speci4c assumptions about the correlation between asset returns and wage
growth later on.
These parameters for the distribution of the asset returns and the wage growth rate
are based on a Dutch yearly dataset from the period 1956–1994 (see Kouwenberg,
2001). We only consider two risky assets in order to facilitate the interpretation of the
results. We now apply the discretized dynamic programming algorithm and solve the
retirement saving model with DRRA numerically:
Case 3.1: We solve the retirement saving model with DRRA utility function (13)
for # = −0:5, p = 3 and % = 3. As a benchmark, we also solve the model with CRRA
objective (10), for # = −0:5 and # = −3:5. In order to distinguish the impact of the
objective we ignore uncertainty about labor income in this example: the wage growth
rate is 4xed at t = 3% annually. We apply the discretized dynamic programming
algorithm on a grid consisting of 36 equally spaced fund values F = 0–3.5 (step size
0:1). Expectations over the return distribution are approximated with 10; 000 simulation
points:
Fig. 2 shows the optimal proportion invested in stocks at time t = 0, as a function
of initial fund value. The investment strategy is clearly myopic for the two constant
relative risk aversion cases # = −0:5 and −3:5, demonstrating the convergence of
the numerical algorithm. With decreasing relative risk aversion the weight of stocks
increases from 28% to 90%. It is clear that this optimal investment strategy can be
explained quite well by the corresponding decreasing relative risk aversion function in
Fig. 1.
We will now additionally investigate the impact of uncertainty about the wage growth
rate. We already know that a plan sponsor with CRRA utility follows a myopic in-
vestment strategy, as there is no substitution between assets in our economy if the
wage growth changes. Note that a change of the wage growth rate does inAuence the
expected fund value. Consequently, we hypothesize that a plan sponsor with DRRA
hedges intertemporally against changes of wage growth, as his investment strategy
is in:uenced by changes in (expected) wealth. We will now demonstrate this eGect
numerically:
Case 3.2: The plan sponsor maximizes DRRA utility function (13) with parameter
values #=−0:5, p=3 and %=3. Additionally, the wage growth rate t is stochastic, with
the parameters speci4ed in Assumption 5. For the correlation between wage growth
and asset returns we consider two cases: 1. bond returns are positively correlated with
wage growth, while stock returns are uncorrelated (B = +1
3 and S = 0) and 2. the
opposite case (B =0 and S =+1
3 ). We apply the discretized dynamic programming
12. 1080 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Wealth-Income Ratio
Fraction
Invested
in
Stocks
Fig. 2. Stock weight for DRRA. This 4gure shows the fraction invested in stocks for constant relative risk
aversion levels # = −3:5 (dotted line) and # = −0:5 (dashed line) and decreasing relative risk aversion
(solid curve). A more risk averse investor dedicates less to stocks (28% for risk aversion level # = −3:5
compared to 90% for risk aversion level # = −0:5). Moreover, decreasing relative risk aversion implies that
the investor desires less exposure to stocks when real wealth drops.
algorithm on a two-dimensional grid for the state variables consisting of 36 equally
spaced fund values F = 0–3:5 (step size 0:1) and 17 wage growth rates = −0:10–
+0:22 (step size 0:02). Expectations over the return distribution are approximated with
10; 000 simulation points.
Fig. 3 shows the optimal stock proportion at time 0 as a function of fund value
and the initial wage growth rate, in the case that bond returns are positively correlated
with wage in:ation. We observe two major eGects. First, the fraction invested in stocks
increases as the fund value becomes larger: this is the familiar result for DRRA. Second,
an increase in the expected wage growth leads to a larger proportion of bonds in the
portfolio in order to hedge against the expected reduction of future wealth, as we
hypothesized earlier.
Fig. 4 displays the results for the case where stock returns are positively correlated
with the wage growth rate. We clearly observe that the fraction invested in stocks
increases at any level of fund value and wage in:ation, compared to the situation in
Fig. 3. This parallel shift of the investment strategy can be explained by the increased
liability hedging credits of stocks. If we concentrate on the dynamic hedging strategy,
the results in Figs. 3 and 4 are similar: an increase of expected wage growth reduces the
proportion of stocks in the portfolio, regardless of the underlying correlation structure.
13. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1081
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Wealth-Income Ratio
Wage Growth Rate
Fraction
Invested
in
Stocks
Fig. 3. Stock weight for DRRA with stochastic wage growth (S =0 and B =0:33). This 4gure shows the
fraction invested in stocks when returns on bonds are positively correlated with wage growth. The percentage
of stocks in the optimal portfolio slightly decreases for increasing wage growth levels.
0.5
1
1.5
2 2.5
3
3.5
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Wealth-Income Ratio
Wage Growth Rate
Fraction
Invested
in
Stocks
Fig. 4. Stock weight for DRRA with stochastic wage growth (S = 0:33 and B = 0). This 4gure shows
the fraction invested in stocks when returns on stocks are positively correlated with wage growth. Compared
to Fig. 3 the graph is shifted only in a parallel way, i.e. the weight increases generally when stock returns
are positively correlated with wage growth. Adjustments of the portfolio as a function of the wage growth
rate are small and comparable to Fig. 3.
14. 1082 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
3.4. The V-shaped consequences of downside-risk measures
In practice a popular objective is to maximize the expected fund value, subject to a
penalty if wealth drops below the investment benchmark, i.e. a penalty on downside-
risk. Downside-risk measures have been introduced as a substitute for standard risk
measures such as variance, as it seems unreasonable to penalize negative and positive
deviations from the benchmark equally. Popular measures include: shortfall probability,
expected shortfall and semivariance (see Bawa and Lindenberg, 1977).
In this section we study the optimal investment strategy if the plan sponsor maxi-
mizes the expected fund value at retirement, subject to a quadratic penalty if he fails
to outperform the investment benchmark (i.e. if FT ¡ 1)
max
wit
E0[U(FT ; T)] =
1
(1 + )T
E0[FT ] − 'E0
min{0; 1 − FT }2
16. and ' ¿ 0 is a constant risk
aversion parameter.
In the normative ALM literature for pension funds the downside-risk concept is
highly successful and seems to have replaced traditional utility functions. Investors
that try to meet their liabilities usually apply a threshold of 1 for the funding ratio, i.e.
the ratio of assets to liabilities. Even regulating authorities nowadays advocate the use
of downside-risk measures to improve the solvency of institutional investors. Not much
attention has been paid, however, to the optimal investment strategies for downside-risk
objectives in a multi-period model.
Downside-risk averse investors can be considered as expected utility maximizers with
a risk-neutral (linear) utility function above the threshold FT = 1 and a utility function
with increasing relative risk aversion (IRRA) below the threshold. The eGect of IRRA
below the threshold might be gambling behavior: a decrease of wealth increases the
portfolio weight of stocks. Furthermore, risk-neutrality above the threshold should lead
to a strong increase in the demand for stocks.
Consequently, in a two-asset economy we expect a V-shaped 4gure if we draw the
optimal stock weight as a function of fund value Ft. We will now solve the retirement
saving model numerically in order to investigate these eGects.
Case 3.3: We solve the retirement saving model with downside-risk objective (15)
for risk aversion values ' = 16 and 64. In order to distinguish the impact of the
investment objective clearly we ignore uncertainty about labor income: the wage growth
rate is 4xed at t =3%. We apply the discretized dynamic programming algorithm on a
grid consisting of 36 equally spaced fund values F =0–3.5 (step size 0:1). Expectations
over the return distributions are approximated with 10,000 simulation points.
Fig. 5 shows the optimal initial weight of stocks for risk aversion levels '=16 and 64.
The optimal investment strategy has a clear V-shape: at low wealth levels the weight of
stocks decreases, while it increases at higher wealth levels. We 4nd equivalent results
for other downside-risk measures such as expected shortfall and shortfall probability,
which have a similar relative risk aversion function. Given the widespread acceptance
of downside-risk measures it is questionable whether investors are fully aware of the
accompanying gambling behavior at low wealth levels.
17. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1083
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Fraction
Invested
in
Stocks
Wealth-Income Ratio
Fig. 5. Stock weight for downside-risk objective. This 4gure shows the fraction invested in stocks at time
t = 0 as a function of the wealth–income ratio for risk aversion parameters ' = 16 (solid curve) and ' = 64
(dotted line). Note that the investor cannot dedicate more than 100% to stocks due to a borrowing constraint.
4. Consumption and funding decisions
4.1. The eEect of a -xed funding payment
In the previous section we have ignored contribution payments by the plan sponsor,
while we focused on optimal investment strategies for the retirement saving model. In
this section we study the additional eGect of funding payments. As a 4rst example, we
consider the impact of a 4xed non-negative contribution payment.
Case 4.1: We solve the retirement saving model with a 4xed contribution rate
ct = 0:05 for t = 0; 1; : : : ; T − 1. The utility over fund value at retirement is CRRA
(10) with # = −3:5, −2 and −0:5. We ignore uncertainty about labor income in this
example: the wage growth rate is 4xed at t =3% annually. The grid of the discretized
dynamic programming algorithm consists of 36 equally spaced fund values F = 0–3:5
(step size 0:1) and the return distributions are approximated with 10; 000 simulation
points.
Fig. 6 displays the optimal investment strategy at time t = 0 for the three levels
of risk aversion. Due to the contribution payments, the portfolio weight of stocks is
decreasing as a function of fund value for # = −2 and −3:5 and the weight is always
18. 1084 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Wealth-Income Ratio
Fraction
Invested
in
Stocks
Fig. 6. Stock weight for CRRA with 4xed contribution rates. The 4gure shows the stock weight at time
t = 0 for power-utility with risk aversion # = −0:5 (dashed line), # = −2 (solid line) and # = −3:5 (dotted
line), with a 4xed contribution rate of ct = 0:05 for t = 0; 1; : : : ; T − 1. Due to the 4xed contribution rate the
portfolio weight of stocks increases at low levels of fund value (wealth-to-income ratio).
at the upper bound for # =−0:5. The plan sponsor appreciates the 4xed payment more
at low fund values than at high fund values (i.e. marginal utility of the contribution
payment decreases). Poor returns on investments therefore have less impact on utility
at low fund levels than at high fund values, which explains the decreasing optimal
portfolio weight of stocks for # = −2 and −3:5.
4.2. The eEect of optimal dynamic funding payments
We will now study the case where the plan sponsor can change the contribution
payments intertemporally. Clearly, the plan sponsor has to make a trade-oG between
low contribution payments and high fund values at retirement. Given Assumption 3,
we formalize this as a trade-oG between the utility H(ct; t) of contribution rates ct and
the utility U(FT ; T) of fund value at retirement.
A widely used and intuitively attractive way for modelling preferences over contri-
bution payments is to minimize the expected net present value. In our framework this
can be speci4ed as H(−ct; t) = −ct=(1 + )t
, subject to the 4xed bounds c 6 ct 6 U
c.
Note, however, that the optimal contribution rate c∗
t for this objective is always at the
lower or upper bound: c∗
t = c or c∗
t = U
c. Hence, minimizing the net present value of
contribution payments will lead to a rather peculiar optimal strategy for setting the
contribution rates (called a “bang-bang” strategy).
19. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1085
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Wealth-Income Ratio
Fraction
Invested
in
Stocks
Fig. 7. Stock weight with HARA-utility over contribution rates. The 4gure shows the fraction invested in
stocks at time t = 0 for power-utility with # = −2 over fund value and HARA-utility over contribution rates
with ( = −2:5 (dashed line), −2 (solid line) and −1:5 (dotted line). The weight of stock increases to the
upper bound 100% at low levels of fund value, due to the increasing marginal value of the contribution
payment.
Instead of the net present value rule, we presume that the plan sponsor maxi-
mizes a HARA-utility (16) over the contribution rates, as it enforces a positive upper
bound U
c ¿ 0 on ct:
H(−ct; t) =
1 − (
(
−ct + U
c
(1 − ()
(
; −∞ 6 ct ¡ U
c; (16)
where ( ¡ 1 is the risk aversion coeOcient and U
c ¿ 0 is the upper bound of the con-
tribution rate.
Note that the HARA-utility function H(−ct; t) is increasing and concave in its 4rst
argument and moreover it has the property of increasing relative risk aversion (IRRA).
We will investigate in Case 4.2 whether this property in:uences the investment strategy.
Case 4.2: We solve the retirement saving model with HARA-utility (16) for contribu-
tion rates, with risk aversion parameters ( = −1:5,−2 and −2:5 and upper
bound U
c = 0:1. The utility function over fund value at retirement is CRRA with
# = −2. The trade-oG parameter between utility over contribution rates and fund value
is = 250; 000. A high value of is required to make sure that contribution rates are
positive at low fund values Ft 6 1. This is due to the fact that the utility function
H(−ct; t) approaches minus in4nity very fast between 0 and the upper bound U
c = 0:1.
Fig. 8 displays the optimal contribution rate ct at time t = 0 as a function of initial
fund value Ft, for the cases ( = −1:5, −2 and −2:5. The optimal contribution rates
20. 1086 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
Wealth-Income Ratio
Contribution
Rate
Fig. 8. Contribution rates with HARA-utility. The 4gure shows the contribution rate at time t = 0 for
power-utility with # = −2 over fund value and HARA-utility over contribution rates with ( = −2:5 (dashed
line), −2 (solid line) and −1:5 (dotted line). The contribution rates decrease approximately linear as a
function of fund value.
are decreasing linearly as functions of fund value, while higher risk aversion ( over
contribution rates leads to lower rates. Fig. 7 shows the investment strategy at time
t = 0 and we 4nd the same decreasing stock weight pattern as in the case of a 4xed
contribution rate (see Fig. 6), although more pronounced. Hence, also in the case of an
optimal dynamic contribution rule we 4nd that contribution payments lead to increased
risk taking at low levels of fund value.
4.3. A lower bound on the funding policy
In practice the contribution rate might be constrained by explicit restrictions (see
Boender, 1997). The HARA-function (16) naturally imposes an upper bound on the
funding payment as marginal utility approaches −∞ near the level U
c. We now consider
the additional eGect of a lower bound on funding payments (ct ¿ c), which we enforce
in the implementation of the discretized dynamic programming algorithm.
Case 4.3: We solve the problem of Case 4.2 again, with the addition of a lower
bound c = 0 on funding payments (i.e. the plan sponsor cannot extract cash from the
fund). The upper bound equals U
c = 0:1 and the risk aversion coeOcients of the utility
functions H(ct; t) and U(FT ; T) are ( = −2 and # = −2.
With an additional lower bound the optimal contribution rate is decreasing linearly
as a function of the fund value until it hits the lower bound c = 0 at F0 = 1:5 and
from thereon it remains constant. In contrast to this predictable result, the optimal
21. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1087
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Wealth-Income Ratio
Fraction
Invested
in
Stocks
Fig. 9. Stock weight for CRRA with a lower bound on funding payments. This 4gure shows the fraction
invested in stocks with lower bound c = 0 on contribution rates. The upward part of the smile is due to the
lower bound on funding payments, which provide a cushion against losses.
investment strategy displayed in Fig. 9 is more surprising. The stock weight 4rst
decreases to a minimum around F0 = 1:9 and from this point onwards it starts to
rise, up to 100%. The increasing stock weight trend in the right side of the graph
can be interpreted as a gambling policy: the potential losses of stocks become less
important as the funding payment is stuck at an involuntary ‘high’ level (provid-
ing a cushion for possible losses), while the potential gains of stocks remain the
same.
4.4. The plan sponsor takes what the plan sponsor gives
Another interesting constraint on the funding policy is one induced by a maximum
allowable level of the fund value. Suppose that the plan sponsor decides that the
value of the retirement fund should never exceed U
F times the labor income of the
employee, as this fund value is considered suOcient to provide a good retirement
income. Consequently, if the fund value Ft exceeds the ‘saturation’ level U
F, then the
plan sponsor extracts cash from the fund (i.e. ct ¡ 0) in order to reduce the fund value
back to U
F.
Case 4.4: We consider Case 4.2, with the addition of a maximum fund level at U
F=2.
The risk aversion coeOcients are #=(=−2 and the upper bound for contribution rates
is U
c = 0:1.
22. 1088 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Wealth-Income Ratio
Fraction
Invested
in
Stocks
Fig. 10. Stock weight for CRRA with an upper bound on fund value. This 4gure shows the fraction invested
in stocks with an upper bound U
F =2 on fund values, enforced with negative contribution rates (i.e. refunds).
Beyond the maximum allowed fund value U
F = 2 the stock weight becomes constant at a low level.
The optimal funding policy in this case is piecewise linear: at fund values above U
F=2
the plan sponsor extract large amounts of cash from the fund. The eGect on the optimal
investment strategy is depicted in Fig. 10. For low fund values the optimal stock weight
is decreasing and it remains at the minimum of 12% for fund values above U
F = 2. As
a consequence of the maximum fund level, the plan sponsor drastically reduces stock
exposure at wealthy fund values. The gains of investing in stocks at high fund values
are reduced by refunds, while the losses of investing in stocks still loom as large as
before.
According to the optimal investment policy in Fig. 10, plan sponsors that would like
to take the excess surplus out of the pension fund in good years should also make
a shift to a more conservative investment policy once the optimal wealth target is
reached.
5. Horizon eects and intertemporal utility over fund value
5.1. Horizon eEects
So far we have displayed the optimal investment and contribution strategy at time
t = 0. We now study to what extent the optimal strategies change as the retirement
date T approaches. In the case of CRRA over fund value and without contribution
payments, the asset weights are constant through time. For DRRA, Fig. 11 shows the
23. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1089
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Wealth-Income Ratio
Fraction
Invested
in
Stocks
Fig. 11. Stock weight at time t = 9; 4 and 0 for DRRA utility. The 4gure shows the fraction invested in
stocks for diGerent investment horizons, given DRRA utility with parameter values #=−0:5, p=3 and %=3.
The dotted line represents the optimal fraction with only 1 year left (t = 9). The dashed line correspond to
an intermediate period (t = 4) and the solid line represents the initial portfolio choice (t = 0).
optimal investment strategy at times t = 9; 4 and 0 (based on Case 3.1). We 4nd that
the weight of stocks increases with the investment horizon for fund levels between
F = 0:4 and 2, although the horizon eGect is rather small.
In the case of a 4xed contribution rate horizon eGects are even present for a CRRA
investor. Fig. 12 shows the optimal stock weight at times t = 9; 4 and 0, for a CRRA
objective with a 4xed contribution rate ct = 0:05 for t = 0; 1; : : : ; T − 1 (based on Case
4.1). One period before retirement (t = 9) the investment strategy is still constant,
while we observe a drastic increase of the stock weight at low fund values for longer
investment horizons (t = 4 and 0).
With optimal dynamic contribution rates based on HARA-utility (16), the horizon
eGect in the investment strategy is very similar to the 4xed payment case in Fig.
12. Fig. 13 shows the optimal dynamic decision rules for setting contributions at
times t = 9; 4 and 0, for a HARA-utility function over contribution rates with ( = −2
and U
c=0:1 and a CRRA utility function over fund values. We 4nd that the contribution
rates tend to increase as we move closer to the retirement date.
5.2. The eEects of intertemporal utility over fund value
Previous results demonstrate that the payment of intertemporal contributions to the
retirement fund has a peculiar eGect on the optimal investment strategy: the plan
24. 1090 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Wealth-Income Ratio
Fraction
Invested
in
Stocks
Fig. 12. Stock weight at time t = 9; 4 and 0 for CRRA utility, with a 4xed contribution rate. The 4gure
shows the fraction invested in stocks for diGerent investment horizons, given CRRA utility with risk aversion
# = −2 and a 4xed contribution rate ct = 0:05 for t = 0; 1; : : : ; T − 1. The dotted line represents the optimal
fraction with only one year left (t = 9). The dashed line corresponds to an intermediate period (t = 4) and
the solid line represents the initial portfolio choice (t = 0).
sponsor increases the weight of stocks as the fund level decreases. Moreover, the gam-
bling eGect becomes worse for longer investment horizons. Note that this investment
policy might be considered impudent, most notably in the case of a de4ned bene4ts
pension scheme.
We will now demonstrate that the propensity to gamble can be reduced considerably
if the plan sponsor cares about intertemporal fund values Ft at times t = 1; 2; : : : ; T − 1
before the planning horizon T. We 4rst introduce the following objective for the plan
sponsor, with intertemporal utility over fund values:
max
wit ;ct
E0
T−1
t=0
H(ct; t) +
T
t=1
U(Ft; t)
: (17)
One might argue that it is not rational for the plan sponsor to worry about fund
value before the actual retirement date T. Note, however, that many pension funds
are monitored by regulatory authorities, in order to keep intertemporal fund values
above prespeci4ed values. These regulations are often applied to de4ned bene4ts pen-
sion plans, where the plan sponsor has made a promise to pay a certain amount at
retirement.
In the next case we calculate investment strategies for the objective function
above.
25. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1091
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
-0.1
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
Wealth-Income Ratio
Contribution
Rate
Fig. 13. Contribution rate at time t =9; 4 and 0, with HARA utility over contribution rates. The 4gure shows
the contribution rate for diGerent investment horizons, given CRRA utility with risk aversion # = −2 and
HARA-utility over contribution rates with ( = −2. The dotted line represents the optimal contribution rate
with only one year left (t = 9). The dashed line corresponds to an intermediate period (t = 4) and the solid
line represents the initial portfolio choice (t = 0).
Case 5.1: We solve the retirement saving model with CRRA utility over fund values,
measured intertemporally according to (17), with # = −2. The utility function over
contribution rates is HARA (16), with risk aversion parameters ( = −2 and upper
bound U
c = 0:1. The trade-oG parameter between utility over contribution rates and fund
value is = 250; 000. We choose this value for to make sure that contribution rate
is positive for funding levels F ¡ 1.
Figs. 14 and 15 show the optimal investment and contribution policy. From Fig. 14
it is clear that the optimal weight of stocks is still slightly higher at low fund levels,
however, the eGect has reduced considerably and it cannot be considered a gambling
strategy anymore. Fig. 15 is also interesting, as it shows that the horizon eGect for the
contribution rates has reversed: as the retirement date T gets nearer, the plan sponsor
pays less contributions. We conclude that a focus on fund value before the retirement
date can greatly reduce the gambling behavior induced by contribution payments.
6. Conclusions
In this paper we studied a retirement saving model with labor income as a bench-
mark for investments and contribution payments by the plan sponsor. Due to mar-
ket incompleteness it is very hard to derive closed-form solutions for the optimal
26. 1092 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Wealth-Income Ratio
Fraction
Invested
in
Stocks
Fig. 14. Stock weight at time t = 9; 4 and 0, with intertemporal utility over fund value. The 4gure shows
the fraction invested in stocks for diGerent investment horizons, given intertemporal measurement of CRRA
utility over fund values with risk aversion # = −2 and HARA-utility over contribution rates with ( = −2.
The dotted line represents the optimal fraction with only one year left (t = 9). The dashed line corresponds
to an intermediate period (t = 4) and the solid line represents the initial portfolio choice (t = 0).
investment and contribution policies of the plan sponsor. We used an eOcient imple-
mentation of the dynamic programming algorithm in order to solve the problem nu-
merically. The main conclusions of our analysis and computational experiments are as
follows:
1. Regardless of his utility function, the plan sponsor invests in a hedge portfo-
lio against random :uctuations of the employee’s labor income. The hedge port-
folio depends on the covariance of the asset returns with the wage growth rate.
The numerical results demonstrate that the correlation between asset returns and
wage growth has a substantial in:uence on portfolio composition. Dynamic adjust-
ments of the hedging strategy due to changes of the wage growth rate are relatively
small.
2. Contribution payments change the optimal investment strategy considerably, even for
a plan sponsor with constant relative risk aversion over fund value. The portfolio
weights are no longer constant and there is a strong tendency to gamble at low
levels of wealth. We also 4nd that contribution payments lead to a investment
horizon eGect. Moreover, additional constraints on the funding policy can have a
large impact on the optimal investment strategy.
3. If a plan sponsor maximizes the expected fund value subject to a penalty on
downside-risk, then the optimal weight of risky assets in the portfolio increases
27. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1093
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
-0.1
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
Wealth-Income Ratio
Contribution
Rate
Fig. 15. Contribution rate at time t =9; 4 and 0, with intertemporal utility over fund value. The 4gure shows
the optimal contribution rate for diGerent investment horizons, given intertemporal measurement of CRRA
utility over fund values with risk aversion # = −2 and HARA-utility over contribution rates with ( = −2.
The dotted line represents t = 9, the dashed line corresponds to t = 4 and the solid line represents the initial
portfolio choice at t = 0.
at low levels of wealth. The gambling policy can be attributed to the increasing
relative risk aversion property of the downside-risk measure.
4. Intertemporal measurement of utility over wealth can reduce gambling eGects.
The insights gained through the numerical computations in this paper may aid fund-
managers to formulate dynamic policies and choose reasonable investment objectives.
Furthermore, the decision rules derived here could be applied in simulation-based mod-
els for asset–liability management, where additional market imperfections such as trans-
action costs and position limits can be taken into account.
Appendix A. Implementation of the dynamic programming algorithm
We apply Monte-Carlo simulation to calculate expectations over the return distribu-
tions in Eq. (7), with an additional variance reduction technique to reduce the approxi-
mation error of the simulation method. We employ the method of antithetic sampling to
replicate the mean of the underlying asset return distributions. Additionally we rescale
the entire sample of returns in order to 4t the variance of the returns exactly.
The implementation of the dynamic programming algorithm uses a discretization of
the state space, i.e. a grid for the values of Ft and t. Note that each simulated drawing
28. 1094 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
from the distribution of the state variables tends to lie in between the points on the
grid at time t + 1. In order to calculate the expectation at time t of the value function
at time t + 1 in Eq. (7) we apply interpolation methods.
First, we consider the cases without stochastic wage growth. Let n = 0; 1; : : : ; N
represent the points on the grid for the fund value F (wealth-to-income ratio), with a
4xed step size of +F between the N +1 points and minimum fund value F. Let J(n; t)
denote the value function in point n = 0; 1; : : : ; N on the grid at time t = 0; 1; : : : ; T.
Suppose that we are at time t in the dynamic programming algorithm and want to
know the value function at F∗
at time t + 1 (in order to approximate the expectation
of the value function numerically). Let n∗
denote the point on the grid with fund value
closest to F∗
: n∗
= (F∗
− F)=+F . We apply interpolation with points surrounding
n∗
, as F∗
tends to lie in between the available fund values F + n+F on the grid for
n=0; 1; : : : ; N. Moreover, in some cases F∗
is larger than the maximum fund value on
the grid (F∗
¿ F + N+F ) and then we apply extrapolation.
In order to facilitate both interpolation and extrapolation for utility functions with
a vertical asymptote, we 4rst transform the value-function: y(n; t) = H(J(n; t)), where
H(:) is an invertible transformation function. The goal of the transformation is to get
rid of the asymptote at low fund values near F (in order to improve the quality of
interpolation) and to get a roughly linear function at high fund values (in order to
improve the quality of extrapolation).
Note that the utility function U(FT ; T) over fund value at retirement is crucial for
the asymptote of the value function and not the utility function over contribution rates
H(ct; t). As the plan sponsor controls the contribution rate ct, he will never let the
utility function over contribution rates go to minus in4nity at a faster rate than the value
function itself (at low levels of wealth F → F). Below is a list of the transformations
applied for the cases studied in the paper:
1. Power and DRRA utility over fund values, see the speci4cation in (13):
y(n; t) = J(n; t)1=(#−p)
for n+F 6 0:5 and y(n; t) = J(n; t)1=#
for n+F ¿ 0:5:
2. Expected fund value subject to a downside-risk penalty, see the speci4cation
in (15):
no transformation required (no vertical asymptote).
Before we interpolate or extrapolate the transformed value function we would like to
know its shape near F∗
. Therefore, we estimate the scaled second derivative of the
transformed value function. Let Qy(n; t + 1) denote a numerical estimate for the 4rst
derivative of y(n; t +1) at time t +1 with respect to fund value F, while Q2
y(n; t +1)
is a numerical estimate of the second derivative of the transformed value function. 3
3 We use a mid-point formula to calculate numerical estimates for the points n = 2; 3; : : : ; N − 2. For the
points on the edge of the grid, n=0; 1 and n=N −1; N, we use a one-sided approximation of the derivatives
(see Press et al., 1989).
29. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1095
The estimate of the scaled second derivative (absolute risk aversion) is
z(n; t + 1) =
Q2
y(n; t + 1)
Qy(n; t + 1)
for n = 0; 1; : : : ; N:
Depending on the magnitude of the scaled second derivative we choose an interpolation
method. Interpolation with a local rational polynomial is a good method for nearly any
function, even with an asymptote (see Press et al., 1989), however, it is rather slow.
If we know that the value function is locally linear then we rather apply a fast linear
interpolation scheme with two points. Moreover, if the value function has an abrupt
change in the second derivative due to a ‘break’ (as in the case of downside-risk
measures near the threshold) it is safer to apply linear interpolation.
We use a decision rule for choosing the interpolation method. Extensive numerical
testing of eOciency and reliability resulted in the following speci4cation:
1. Power and DRRA utility over fund values:
If F∗
¿ F + N+F then we apply linear extrapolation with 2 points.
If |z(n∗
; t + 1)| ¿ 4:5 then we apply rational interpolation with 10 points.
If 0:5 ¡ |z(n∗
; t + 1)| 6 4:5 then we apply polynomial interpolation with 4 points.
If |z(n∗
; t + 1)| 6 0:5 then we apply linear interpolation with 2 points.
2. Expected fund value subject to a downside-risk penalty:
If F∗
¿ F + N+F then we apply linear extrapolation with 2 points.
If F∗
¡ 0:9 and |z(n∗
; t + 1)| ¿ 0:5 then we apply polynomial interpolation with 4
points.
In other cases we apply linear interpolation.
After applying the interpolation or extrapolation above, we obtain y∗
as an estimate
of the transformed value function in the point F∗
. As a last step, we use the inverse
transformation H−1
(y∗
)=J∗
, to get the required estimate of the original value function
in the point F∗
.
Finally, if we additionally consider mean-reverting wage growth rates then the state
space grid becomes two-dimensional. In the wage growth dimension we use linear
interpolation with two points, as there are no problems with asymptotes or abrupt
changes of the value function. We apply the transformation and interpolation methods
as described previously in the fund value dimension.
In order to 4nd the optimal 4nd the optimal policies that maximize the dynamic pro-
gramming Eq. (7), we exploit Powell’s method (Press et al., 1989). The computation-
times can be cut drastically by using the optimal policy of a neighboring grid point
as initial guess for the optimization method. Note that Powell’s method does not ex-
plicitly handle bounds on the decision variables. However, we can still impose lower
and upper bounds on the variables by simple transformations with an exponential or
arctangent function.
Our implementation of the discretized dynamic programming algorithm converges to
the optimal solution, given a number of mild continuity assumptions about the utility
functions. Convergence in this context means that the numerical approximation of the
value function at time t =0 will get arbitrarily close to the actual value function, as the
30. 1096 A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097
distance between points on the grid becomes smaller. We refer to Bertsekas (1976)
for a convergence proof of the discretized dynamic programming algorithm without
interpolation schemes.
We have tested the convergence of our implementation of the discretized dynamic
programming algorithm and found satisfactory results. For example, suppose that the
objective function is to maximize power utility (10) with #=−0:5, without contribution
payments and ignoring stochastic wage growth. There are two assets: a stock with
log-normally distributed returns with mean S=8:6%, standard deviation S=15:7% and
a riskless asset with return r =6:8%. We applied the discretized dynamic programming
algorithm on a grid consisting of 36 equally spaced fund values F = 0–3:5 (step size
0:1). Expectations over the return distribution are approximated with 10; 000 simulation
points.
The optimal stock weight found by the algorithm is 82.6% for all 36 levels of the
funding level, and in all 10 periods. The standard deviation of the 360 stock weights is
0:0014%, and the diGerence between the minimum and the maximum is only 0:0107%.
Hence, the variation in the weights is negligible, and we 4nd a constant stock weight
as predicted by theory. As a comparison, we also maximized a one-period version of
the same problem in Excel, using a discretized log-normal distribution consisting of a
1000 points: the optimal stock weight found by the Excel solver was also 82.6%.
References
Balduzzi, P., Lynch, A., 1999. Transaction costs and predictability: some utility cost calculations. Journal of
Financial Economics 52, 47–78.
Barberis, N., 2000. Investing for the long run when returns are predictable. Journal of Finance 55, 225–264.
Bawa, V.S., Lindenberg, E.B., 1977. Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework.
Journal of Financial Economics 5, 189–200.
Bellman, R., 1957. Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Bertsekas, D.P., 1976. Dynamic Programming and Stochastic Control. Academic Press, New York.
Boender, G.C.E., 1997. A hybrid simulation=optimisation scenario model for asset=liability management.
European Journal of Operational Research 99, 126–135.
Brennan, M.J., Schwartz, E.S., Lagnado, R., 1997. Strategic asset allocation. Journal of Economic Dynamics
and Control 21, 1377–1403.
Haberman, S., Sung, J.-H., 1994. Dynamic approaches to pension funding. Insurance: Mathematics and
Economics 15, 151–162.
Hakansson, N.H., 1969. Optimal investment and consumption strategies under risk, an uncertain lifetime and
insurance. International Economic Review 10, 443–466.
Koo, H.K., 1999. Consumption and portfolio selection with labor income: a discrete-time approach.
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 50, 219–243.
Kouwenberg, R., 2001. Scenario generation and stochastic programming models for asset–liability
management. European Journal of Operational Research 134, 279–292.
Leibowitz, M.L., Kogelman, S., Bader, L.N., 1994. Funding ratio return. Journal of Portfolio Management
(Fall), 39–47.
Merton, R.C., 1971. Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model. Journal of
Economic Theory 3, 373–413.
Mossin, J., 1968. Optimal multiperiod portfolio policies. Journal of Business 41, 215–229.
Mulvey, J.M., Ziemba, W.T., 1998. Asset and liability management systems for long-term investors:
discussion of the issues. In: Mulvey, J.M., Ziemba, W.T. (Eds.), Worldwide Asset and Liability Modelling.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–38.
31. A. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg / Journal of Economic Dynamics Control 27 (2003) 1069–1097 1097
O’Brien, T., 1987. A two-parameter family of pension contribution functions and stochastic optimization.
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 6, 129–134.
Press, W., Flannery, B., Teukolsky, S., Vetterling, W., 1989. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scienti4c
Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Samuelson, P.A., 1969. Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming. Review of
Economics and Statistics 51, 239–246.
Sharpe, W.F., Tint, L.G., 1990. Liabilities—a new approach. Journal of Portfolio Management (Winter),
5–10.
Zenios, S.A., 1999. High-performance computing in 4nance: the last ten years and the next. Parallel
Computing 25, 2149–2175.