MATLAB Modeling of SPT and Grain Size Data in Producing Soil ProfilePsychōjit MØmz
The study was carried out to find out a suitable numerical procedure for establishing a graphical presentation of the soil profile of a site using SPT values and grain size analysis data. MATLAB numerical tool was used for this purpose and the soil properties was estimated using established empirical correlations. A computer Software was developed where SPT values at borehole locations, percent of grain sizes, water table and GPS coordinates of the site were used as inputs, Rectangular grids in 2-D or 3-D space were created for interpolation or extrapolation of the gridded data in ‘meshgrid’ format. The output yielded intermittent SPT profile and the contour plot matrix for subsoil soil condition of a site. The output soil-profile is presented by a 3-D shaded surface plot that would be useful for preliminary selection of a project site, land use planning, zoning ordinances, pre-disaster planning, capital investment planning,
Fifteen borehole data of SPT values and grain sizes along a 20 km stretch of ongoing Janjira approach road project of Padma multipurpose bridge in Madaripur district were used to verify the usability of the developed Software. Disturbed soil sample were collected up to depths of 19.5m depth in every 1.5m interval to perform grain size analysis test. Excel spreadsheet was used where more than 500 data including SPT-N values, percent sand and fines at depths, GPS coordinated, reduce level and ground water table. The soils at the site were predominantly alluvial deposits. All these data were used in MATLAB interactive environment for numerical computation, visualization, and programming. The purposes of the study were to find SPT contour profile and soil-profile of a particular alignment of the site and to extract borehole Log form SPT profile and soil-profile of a specific location of the alignment.
Outcome of this study can be used in microzonation studies, site response analysis, calculation of bearing capacity of subsoils in the region and producing a number of parameters which are empirically related to SPT values.
In this presentation, the nonlinear seismic behavior of three ordinary moment-resisting concrete space frames with unsymmetrical plan in three, four and five stories are evaluated. The three buildings were originally designed according to existing Iranian codes. Seismic loads are calculated and distributed over the height of the frame using both rectangular and triangular forms. It has been found that the obtained capacity curves have been affected greatly by the forms of loading. Results have been also produced in form of story drifts to establish the performance level of these buildings. The results show that all of the frames in both directions are within the life safety performance level.
MATLAB Modeling of SPT and Grain Size Data in Producing Soil ProfilePsychōjit MØmz
The study was carried out to find out a suitable numerical procedure for establishing a graphical presentation of the soil profile of a site using SPT values and grain size analysis data. MATLAB numerical tool was used for this purpose and the soil properties was estimated using established empirical correlations. A computer Software was developed where SPT values at borehole locations, percent of grain sizes, water table and GPS coordinates of the site were used as inputs, Rectangular grids in 2-D or 3-D space were created for interpolation or extrapolation of the gridded data in ‘meshgrid’ format. The output yielded intermittent SPT profile and the contour plot matrix for subsoil soil condition of a site. The output soil-profile is presented by a 3-D shaded surface plot that would be useful for preliminary selection of a project site, land use planning, zoning ordinances, pre-disaster planning, capital investment planning,
Fifteen borehole data of SPT values and grain sizes along a 20 km stretch of ongoing Janjira approach road project of Padma multipurpose bridge in Madaripur district were used to verify the usability of the developed Software. Disturbed soil sample were collected up to depths of 19.5m depth in every 1.5m interval to perform grain size analysis test. Excel spreadsheet was used where more than 500 data including SPT-N values, percent sand and fines at depths, GPS coordinated, reduce level and ground water table. The soils at the site were predominantly alluvial deposits. All these data were used in MATLAB interactive environment for numerical computation, visualization, and programming. The purposes of the study were to find SPT contour profile and soil-profile of a particular alignment of the site and to extract borehole Log form SPT profile and soil-profile of a specific location of the alignment.
Outcome of this study can be used in microzonation studies, site response analysis, calculation of bearing capacity of subsoils in the region and producing a number of parameters which are empirically related to SPT values.
In this presentation, the nonlinear seismic behavior of three ordinary moment-resisting concrete space frames with unsymmetrical plan in three, four and five stories are evaluated. The three buildings were originally designed according to existing Iranian codes. Seismic loads are calculated and distributed over the height of the frame using both rectangular and triangular forms. It has been found that the obtained capacity curves have been affected greatly by the forms of loading. Results have been also produced in form of story drifts to establish the performance level of these buildings. The results show that all of the frames in both directions are within the life safety performance level.
SHAPE AND SIZES OF BRICK
First class bricks
Second class bricks
Third class bricks
Fourth class bricks
SIZE AND SHAPE
COLOUR
TEXTURE AND COMPACTNESS
HARDNESS AND SOUNDNESS
WATER ABSORBTION
CRUSHING STRENGTH
Geopolymer bricks are the new innovation in the field of brick industry. Geopolymer bricks contain fly ash as the source material and an alkaline activator for the activation of polymerization reaction.experimental work is supposed to be performed on geopolymer bricks with fly ash and GGBS as source materials and sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate as an activator. It reduces dead load on structures due to light weight (2.6 kg, dimension: 230 mm X 110 mm X 70 mm).
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE BUILDING BY USING ETABSila vamsi krishna
RESULT OF ANALYSIS:
https://www.slideshare.net/ilavamsikrishna/results-of-etabs-on-high-rise-residential-buildings
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BUILDING BY USING STAAD PRO PPT link :
https://www.slideshare.net/ilavamsikrishna/analysis-and-design-of-mutistoried-residential-building-by-using-staad-pro
FOR FULL REPORT:
vamsiila@gmail.com
Calculating quantity of cement in m20 grade concreteila vamsi krishna
SOMETIMES WE NEED TO FILL CONCRETE OF CERTAIN CUBIC METER, BUT THE PROBLEM WE DON’T KNOW HOW MUCH CEMENT,F.A,C.A, WE HAVE TO TAKE IN KGS……….. THAT PROBLEM SOLVED HERE….!
Preliminary design of beam
before going to give properties to the structure in the staad pro preliminary design have to be done to find out the dimensions of beam
Priliminary design of column
before going to give properties to the structure in the staad pro preliminary design have to be done to find out the dimensions of column
analysis and design of mutistoried residential building by using staad pro
we considered g+4 residential building
ANYLYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY USING ETABS
copy below Link to view presentation
https://www.slideshare.net/ilavamsikrishna/analysis-and-design-of-high-rise-building-by-using-etabs
vamsiila@gmail.com
TECHNICAL TRAINING MANUAL GENERAL FAMILIARIZATION COURSEDuvanRamosGarzon1
AIRCRAFT GENERAL
The Single Aisle is the most advanced family aircraft in service today, with fly-by-wire flight controls.
The A318, A319, A320 and A321 are twin-engine subsonic medium range aircraft.
The family offers a choice of engines
SHAPE AND SIZES OF BRICK
First class bricks
Second class bricks
Third class bricks
Fourth class bricks
SIZE AND SHAPE
COLOUR
TEXTURE AND COMPACTNESS
HARDNESS AND SOUNDNESS
WATER ABSORBTION
CRUSHING STRENGTH
Geopolymer bricks are the new innovation in the field of brick industry. Geopolymer bricks contain fly ash as the source material and an alkaline activator for the activation of polymerization reaction.experimental work is supposed to be performed on geopolymer bricks with fly ash and GGBS as source materials and sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate as an activator. It reduces dead load on structures due to light weight (2.6 kg, dimension: 230 mm X 110 mm X 70 mm).
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE BUILDING BY USING ETABSila vamsi krishna
RESULT OF ANALYSIS:
https://www.slideshare.net/ilavamsikrishna/results-of-etabs-on-high-rise-residential-buildings
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BUILDING BY USING STAAD PRO PPT link :
https://www.slideshare.net/ilavamsikrishna/analysis-and-design-of-mutistoried-residential-building-by-using-staad-pro
FOR FULL REPORT:
vamsiila@gmail.com
Calculating quantity of cement in m20 grade concreteila vamsi krishna
SOMETIMES WE NEED TO FILL CONCRETE OF CERTAIN CUBIC METER, BUT THE PROBLEM WE DON’T KNOW HOW MUCH CEMENT,F.A,C.A, WE HAVE TO TAKE IN KGS……….. THAT PROBLEM SOLVED HERE….!
Preliminary design of beam
before going to give properties to the structure in the staad pro preliminary design have to be done to find out the dimensions of beam
Priliminary design of column
before going to give properties to the structure in the staad pro preliminary design have to be done to find out the dimensions of column
analysis and design of mutistoried residential building by using staad pro
we considered g+4 residential building
ANYLYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY USING ETABS
copy below Link to view presentation
https://www.slideshare.net/ilavamsikrishna/analysis-and-design-of-high-rise-building-by-using-etabs
vamsiila@gmail.com
TECHNICAL TRAINING MANUAL GENERAL FAMILIARIZATION COURSEDuvanRamosGarzon1
AIRCRAFT GENERAL
The Single Aisle is the most advanced family aircraft in service today, with fly-by-wire flight controls.
The A318, A319, A320 and A321 are twin-engine subsonic medium range aircraft.
The family offers a choice of engines
Overview of the fundamental roles in Hydropower generation and the components involved in wider Electrical Engineering.
This paper presents the design and construction of hydroelectric dams from the hydrologist’s survey of the valley before construction, all aspects and involved disciplines, fluid dynamics, structural engineering, generation and mains frequency regulation to the very transmission of power through the network in the United Kingdom.
Author: Robbie Edward Sayers
Collaborators and co editors: Charlie Sims and Connor Healey.
(C) 2024 Robbie E. Sayers
About
Indigenized remote control interface card suitable for MAFI system CCR equipment. Compatible for IDM8000 CCR. Backplane mounted serial and TCP/Ethernet communication module for CCR remote access. IDM 8000 CCR remote control on serial and TCP protocol.
• Remote control: Parallel or serial interface.
• Compatible with MAFI CCR system.
• Compatible with IDM8000 CCR.
• Compatible with Backplane mount serial communication.
• Compatible with commercial and Defence aviation CCR system.
• Remote control system for accessing CCR and allied system over serial or TCP.
• Indigenized local Support/presence in India.
• Easy in configuration using DIP switches.
Technical Specifications
Indigenized remote control interface card suitable for MAFI system CCR equipment. Compatible for IDM8000 CCR. Backplane mounted serial and TCP/Ethernet communication module for CCR remote access. IDM 8000 CCR remote control on serial and TCP protocol.
Key Features
Indigenized remote control interface card suitable for MAFI system CCR equipment. Compatible for IDM8000 CCR. Backplane mounted serial and TCP/Ethernet communication module for CCR remote access. IDM 8000 CCR remote control on serial and TCP protocol.
• Remote control: Parallel or serial interface
• Compatible with MAFI CCR system
• Copatiable with IDM8000 CCR
• Compatible with Backplane mount serial communication.
• Compatible with commercial and Defence aviation CCR system.
• Remote control system for accessing CCR and allied system over serial or TCP.
• Indigenized local Support/presence in India.
Application
• Remote control: Parallel or serial interface.
• Compatible with MAFI CCR system.
• Compatible with IDM8000 CCR.
• Compatible with Backplane mount serial communication.
• Compatible with commercial and Defence aviation CCR system.
• Remote control system for accessing CCR and allied system over serial or TCP.
• Indigenized local Support/presence in India.
• Easy in configuration using DIP switches.
Explore the innovative world of trenchless pipe repair with our comprehensive guide, "The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair." This document delves into the modern methods of repairing underground pipes without the need for extensive excavation, highlighting the numerous advantages and the latest techniques used in the industry.
Learn about the cost savings, reduced environmental impact, and minimal disruption associated with trenchless technology. Discover detailed explanations of popular techniques such as pipe bursting, cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining, and directional drilling. Understand how these methods can be applied to various types of infrastructure, from residential plumbing to large-scale municipal systems.
Ideal for homeowners, contractors, engineers, and anyone interested in modern plumbing solutions, this guide provides valuable insights into why trenchless pipe repair is becoming the preferred choice for pipe rehabilitation. Stay informed about the latest advancements and best practices in the field.
COLLEGE BUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdfKamal Acharya
The College Bus Management system is completely developed by Visual Basic .NET Version. The application is connect with most secured database language MS SQL Server. The application is develop by using best combination of front-end and back-end languages. The application is totally design like flat user interface. This flat user interface is more attractive user interface in 2017. The application is gives more important to the system functionality. The application is to manage the student’s details, driver’s details, bus details, bus route details, bus fees details and more. The application has only one unit for admin. The admin can manage the entire application. The admin can login into the application by using username and password of the admin. The application is develop for big and small colleges. It is more user friendly for non-computer person. Even they can easily learn how to manage the application within hours. The application is more secure by the admin. The system will give an effective output for the VB.Net and SQL Server given as input to the system. The compiled java program given as input to the system, after scanning the program will generate different reports. The application generates the report for users. The admin can view and download the report of the data. The application deliver the excel format reports. Because, excel formatted reports is very easy to understand the income and expense of the college bus. This application is mainly develop for windows operating system users. In 2017, 73% of people enterprises are using windows operating system. So the application will easily install for all the windows operating system users. The application-developed size is very low. The application consumes very low space in disk. Therefore, the user can allocate very minimum local disk space for this application.
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)MdTanvirMahtab2
This presentation is about the working procedure of Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL). A Govt. owned Company of Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation under Ministry of Industries.
Immunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary Attacksgerogepatton
This paper addresses the vulnerability of deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks
(CNN)s, to adversarial attacks and presents a proactive training technique designed to counter them. We
introduce a novel volumization algorithm, which transforms 2D images into 3D volumetric representations.
When combined with 3D convolution and deep curriculum learning optimization (CLO), itsignificantly improves
the immunity of models against localized universal attacks by up to 40%. We evaluate our proposed approach
using contemporary CNN architectures and the modified Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR-10
and CIFAR-100) and ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC12) datasets, showcasing
accuracy improvements over previous techniques. The results indicate that the combination of the volumetric
input and curriculum learning holds significant promise for mitigating adversarial attacks without necessitating
adversary training.
Cosmetic shop management system project report.pdfKamal Acharya
Buying new cosmetic products is difficult. It can even be scary for those who have sensitive skin and are prone to skin trouble. The information needed to alleviate this problem is on the back of each product, but it's thought to interpret those ingredient lists unless you have a background in chemistry.
Instead of buying and hoping for the best, we can use data science to help us predict which products may be good fits for us. It includes various function programs to do the above mentioned tasks.
Data file handling has been effectively used in the program.
The automated cosmetic shop management system should deal with the automation of general workflow and administration process of the shop. The main processes of the system focus on customer's request where the system is able to search the most appropriate products and deliver it to the customers. It should help the employees to quickly identify the list of cosmetic product that have reached the minimum quantity and also keep a track of expired date for each cosmetic product. It should help the employees to find the rack number in which the product is placed.It is also Faster and more efficient way.
Democratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek Aryaabh.arya
Presented at NUS: Fuzzing and Software Security Summer School 2024
This keynote talks about the democratization of fuzzing at scale, highlighting the collaboration between open source communities, academia, and industry to advance the field of fuzzing. It delves into the history of fuzzing, the development of scalable fuzzing platforms, and the empowerment of community-driven research. The talk will further discuss recent advancements leveraging AI/ML and offer insights into the future evolution of the fuzzing landscape.
Student information management system project report ii.pdfKamal Acharya
Our project explains about the student management. This project mainly explains the various actions related to student details. This project shows some ease in adding, editing and deleting the student details. It also provides a less time consuming process for viewing, adding, editing and deleting the marks of the students.
Event Management System Vb Net Project Report.pdfKamal Acharya
In present era, the scopes of information technology growing with a very fast .We do not see any are untouched from this industry. The scope of information technology has become wider includes: Business and industry. Household Business, Communication, Education, Entertainment, Science, Medicine, Engineering, Distance Learning, Weather Forecasting. Carrier Searching and so on.
My project named “Event Management System” is software that store and maintained all events coordinated in college. It also helpful to print related reports. My project will help to record the events coordinated by faculties with their Name, Event subject, date & details in an efficient & effective ways.
In my system we have to make a system by which a user can record all events coordinated by a particular faculty. In our proposed system some more featured are added which differs it from the existing system such as security.
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
Results of ETABS on HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
1. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY ETABS
RESULTS
ila vamsikrishna
2. RESULTS
Table 6.1 Comparative values of displacement in Linear static analysis along
zone-4, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Displacement
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 20.1 10
14 19.1 9.2
13 17.8 8.3
12 16.2 7.4
11 14.5 6.5
10 12.8 5.6
9 11.4 4.8
8 10 3.9
7 8.6 3.1
6 7.2 2.4
5 5.8 1.7
4 4.4 1.2
3 3 0.7
2 1.8 0.3
1 0.6 0.1
Base 0 0
e-4Displacement vs no. of stories zon
25
soil-1 in linear static analysis
20
15
without brancing10
5
with brancings0
no of storys
Graph 6.1 Variation of displacement with bracings & without bracings
in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-1.
3. Table 6.2 Comparative values of displacement in Linear static analysis
along zone-4, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
DISPLACEMENT
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
No of stories with out with bracing
bracings
15 26.9 11.7
14 25.6 10.7
13 23.9 9.7
12 21.7 8.7
11 19.3 7.6
10 17.1 6.6
9 15.3 5.6
8 13.4 4.6
7 11.5 3.7
6 9.6 2.8
5 7.7 2.1
4 5.9 1.4
3 4.1 0.8
2 2.4 0.4
1 0.8 0.1
ZONE 4 SOIL 2 DISPLACEMENT
WITHOUT BRACINGS
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
no of storys
Graph 6.2 Variation of displacement with bracings & without bracings in
linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-2.
4. Table 6.3 Comparative values of displacement force in Linear static
analysis along zone-4, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 0.9 0.5
14 0.8 0.5
13 0.7 0.4
12 0.7 0.4
11 0.6 0.3
10 0.5 0.3
9 0.4 0.2
8 0.3 0.2
7 0.2 0.1
6 0.2 0.1
5 0.1 0.1
4 0.1 0.03972
3 0.04454 0.02325
2 0.01956 0.01259
1 0.004903 0.007983
DISPLACEMENT
ZONE IV SOIL III DISPLACEMENT
1
0.8
0.6
0.4 Without bracings
0.2
0
no of storys
Graph 6.3 Variation of displacement with bracings &
without bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4
soil-3.
5. Table 6.4 Comparative values of moment in Linear static analysis
along zone-4, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Moment
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -9.6867 -1.9812
13 -4.6195 -0.4492
12 -5.2753 -0.1853
11 -4.9834 -0.7851
10 -4.8566 -0.9563
9 -8.4895 -2.4698
8 -6.2533 -3.0398
7 -6.2962 -3.6656
6 -5.9413 -4.2256
5 -5.6314 -4.7436
4 -5.285 -5.2256
3 -4.9076 -5.5896
2 -4.4901 -6.451
1 -4.0027 -3.519
base -3.4739 0.7189
Moment Vs No of stories zone-4
soil-2 in linear static analysis
2
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1-2
-4
WITHO UT BRACING S-6
-8
-10
-12
No of stories
Graph 6.4 Variation of moment with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-1.
6. Table 6.5 Comparative values of moment in Linear static analysis
along zone-4, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Moment
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -9.6867 -1.9812
13 -4.6195 -0.4492
12 -5.2753 -0.1853
11 -4.9834 -0.7851
10 -4.8566 -0.9563
9 -8.4895 -2.4698
8 -6.2533 -3.0398
7 -6.2962 -3.6656
6 -5.9413 -4.2256
5 -5.6314 -4.7436
4 -5.285 -5.2256
3 -4.9076 -5.5896
2 -4.4901 -6.451
1 -4.0027 -3.519
base -3.4739 0.7189
Moment Vs No of stories zone-4
soil-2 in linear static analysis
5
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1 WITHO UT BRACING S-5
-10 WITH BRACINGS
-15
No of stories
Graph 6.5 Variation of moment with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-2.
7. Table 6.6 Comparative values of moment in Linear static analysis along
zone-4, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 -11.13 -2.69
14 -5.1 -0.34
13 -6.07 0
12 -5.7 -1.29
11 -5.5 -2.86
10 -5.41 -4.49
9 -5.23 -6.19
8 -5.04 -7.94
7 -4.85 -9.73
6 -4.63 -11.55
5 -4.41 -13.39
4 -4.16 -15.24
3 -3.89 -16.88
2 -3.56 -20.18
1 -3.3 -13.24
base 0 0
Moment Vs No of stories zone-4
soil-3 in linear static analysis
moment
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16-5
-10
Without bracings
-15
-20
-25
no storys
Graph 6.6 Variation of moment with bracings & without bracings in linear
static analysis along Zone 4 soil-3.
Page 63
8. Table 6.7 Comparative values of shear in Linear static analysis along
zone-4, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Shear
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 6.7641 1.2852
14 4.4337 0.2581
13 4.7087 -0.1737
12 4.5499 -0.6491
11 4.2482 -0.8351
10 7.4024 -1.9522
9 6.1009 -2.3392
8 6.0096 -2.8787
7 5.6951 -3.3579
6 5.3915 -3.3115
5 5.0534 -4.213
4 4.6792 -4.6012
3 4.2678 -5.2421
2 3.7597 -3.7019
1 3.4445 -1.2694
Shear vs no.of stories zone-4 soil-1 in
linear static analysis
without brancing
with brancings
No. of stories
Graph 6.7 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-1.
9. Table 6.8 Comparative values of shear in Linear static analysis along
zone-4, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -9.1318 -1.8833
13 -2.591 -0.499
12 -1.3023 -0.0444
11 0.9519 0.4473
10 2.2318 0.973
9 -2.1149 2.5452
8 1.7006 2.9942
7 2.8694 3.6494
6 4.1905 4.2123
5 5.3164 4.7453
4 6.3542 5.2658
3 7.3384 5.7469
2 8.3015 6.597
1 9.3418 5.6998
base 9.8725 -0.4907
SHEARFORCE
Shear vs no.of stories zone-4 soil-2 in
15 linear static analysis
10
5
WITHOUT BRACINGS0
-5 WITH BRACINGS
-10
-15
no of storys
Graph 6.8 Variation of shear with bracings & without bracings in linear
static analysis along Zone 4 soil-2.
10. Table 6.9 Comparative values of shear in Linear static analysis along
zone-4, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
SHEAR
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 0 2.37
14 0 1.41
13 0 0.91
12 0 0.29
11 0.51 0
10 2.26 0
9 3.79 0
8 5.09 0
7 6.2 0
6 7.14 0
5 7.95 0
4 8.66 0
3 9.31 0
2 9.91 0
1 10.73 0
base 9.592 0
Shear vs no.of stories zone-4 soil- in
linear static analysis
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Axis Title
Graph 6.9 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-3.
11. Table 6.10 Comparative values of displacement in Linear static
analysis along zone-5, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
DISPLACEMENT
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 29.3 14.6
14 27.9 13.3
13 26 12.1
12 23.8 10.8
11 21.2 9.5
10 18.8 8.2
9 16.8 7
8 14.8 5.8
7 12.7 4.6
6 10.6 3.5
5 8.5 2.6
4 6.5 1.7
3 4.5 1
2 2.6 0.5
1 0.9 0.1
base 0 0
40
ZONE 5 SOIL 1 DISPLACEMENT
30
20
WITHO UT BRACING S
10
WITH BRACINGS
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
Axis Title
Graph 6.10 Variation of displacement with bracings
& without bracings in linear static analysis along
Zone 5 soil -1.
12. Table 6.11 Comparative values of displacement in Linear static analysis
along zone-5, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Displacementinmm
50
40
30
20
10
0
No of stories
With out bracings with bracing
15 38.6 17.6
14 36.9 16.1
13 34.5 14.6
12 31.5 13
11 28.2 11.5
10 25 9.9
9 22.4 8.4
8 19.7 7
7 17 5.6
6 14.2 4.3
5 11.4 3.1
4 8.7 2.1
3 6 1.2
2 3.5 0.6
1 1.2 0.1
Displacement Vs No of stories zone 5
soil 2 in Linear static analysis
WITHOUT BRACINGS
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.11 Variation of displacement with bracings &
without bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 5
soil-2.
13. Table 6.12 Comparative values of displacement in Linear static
analysis along zone-5, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
AxisTitle
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 49.9 24.6
14 48.5 22.9
13 46.7 21.2
12 44.5 19.3
11 41.9 17.4
10 39 15.4
9 35.8 13.4
8 32.4 11.4
7 29 9.5
6 25.4 7.7
5 21.8 5.9
4 18.1 4.3
3 14.6 2.9
2 11 1.7
1 7 0.7
base 49.9 24.6
Chart Title
without bracings
with bracings
Axis Title
Graph 6.12 Variation of displacement with bracings & without bracings
in linear static analysis along Zone 5 soil-3.
14. Table 6.13 Comparative values of moment in Linear static analysis
along zone-5, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
MOMENT
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -9.1865 -1.9644
13 -4.7655 -0.4509
12 -5.3846 -0.142
11 -5.0931 -0.67
10 -4.9331 -0.7051
9 -8.4023 -1.747
8 -6.202 -2.1416
7 -6.2375 -2.538
6 -5.3823 -2.8962
5 -5.3719 -3.168
4 -5.226 -3.3336
3 -4.8501 -3.453
2 -4.4352 -3.9098
1 -3.9508 -1.5856
base -3.4218 -0.1273
ZONE 5 SOIL 1 MOMENT
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
Axis Title
Graph 6.13 Variation of moment with bracings &
without bracings in linear static analysis along Zone
5 soil-1.
15. Table 6.14 Comparative values of moment in Linear static analysis
along zone-5, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Moment
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -5.8044 -1.0423
13 -2.939 -0.1253
12 -3.2756 -0.1759
11 -3.0199 -0.4061
10 -3.1871 0.2429
9 -7.7804 -0.7219
8 -5.4959 -0.3023
7 -5.6468 -0.2393
6 -5.353 -0.2014
5 -5.1031 -0.2144
4 -4.8092 -0.2646
3 -4.4797 -0.3511
2 -4.1068 -0.4622
1 -3.6618 -0.6834
base -3.1569 -1.5996
Moment vs No of stories zone 5 soil 2
in Linear static analysis
2
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1-2
WITHO UT BRACING S-4
-6 WITH BRACINGS
-8
-10
No of stories
Graph 6.14 Variation of moment with bracings &
without bracings in linear static analysis along Zone
5 soil-2.
16. Table 6.15 Comparative values of moment in Linear static analysis
along zone-5, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 13.5198 3.8554
14 7.8516 1.5436
13 8.6153 1.1667
12 8.1314 0.8476
11 7.8828 0.6943
10 7.5748 0.6217
9 7.2371 0.6036
8 6.8607 0.6178
7 6.4424 0.6486
6 5.9777 0.6822
5 5.4597 0.7052
4 4.8885 0.701
3 4.2113 0.6468
2 3.5615 0.5201
1 1.9079 0.5001
base 1.10 0.40
15
10
MOMENT zone v soil 3
moment
5 without bracings
0
Axis Title
Graph 6.15 Variation of moment with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 5 soil-3.
17. Table 6.16 Comparative values of shear in Linear static analysis along
zone-5, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -9.1716 -1.8781
13 -2.3183 -0.4016
12 -0.7969 0.0956
11 1.6103 0.6154
10 3.2697 1.1171
9 -0.3312 2.6892
8 3.0915 3.0842
7 4.3397 3.6684
6 5.7204 4.1473
5 6.8856 4.5854
4 7.946 5.0022
3 8.9383 5.3836
2 9.8976 6.0753
1 10.9168 5.4342
base 11.4281 -1.2607
SHEARFORCE
ZONE 5 SOIL 1 SHEAR FORCE
15
10
5
0
WITH BRACINGS -5
-10
-15
Graph 6.16 Variation of shear with bracings & without bracings in linear
static analysis along Zone 5 soil-1.
18. Table 6.17 Comparative values of shear in Linear static analysis along
zone-5, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -4.5576 -1.0252
13 2.0044 0.0909
12 4.3713 0.4713
11 7.4913 0.8633
10 9.2548 0.9423
9 4.719 1.8467
8 9.3709 2.2664
7 10.7151 2.7312
6 12.1956 3.0997
5 13.3722 3.4173
4 14.3853 3.7067
3 15.2777 3.9755
2 16.0966 4.4434
1 16.8864 4.3395
base 17.2417 -2.5484
Shearforce
Shear force Vs No of stories zone 5 soil
2 in linear static analysis
20
15
10
WITHO UT BRACING S5
0 WITH BRACINGS
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1-5
-10
No of stories
Graph 6.17 Variation of shear with bracings & without bracings in linear
static analysis along Zone 5 soil-2.
19. Table 6.18 Comparative values of shear in Linear static analysis along
zone-5, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 11.2601 0.8792
14 11.8459 -0.0293
13 14.6359 -0.4963
12 16.5594 -0.9986
11 18.1719 -1.4825
10 19.4341 -1.9626
9 20.3936 -2.4391
8 21.081 -2.913
7 21.529 -3.3844
6 21.7645 -3.8539
5 21.8338 -4.3175
4 21.634 -4.8005
3 21.6853 -5.1348
2 17.3676 -6.4345
1 23.8213 -1.9928
base 11.2601 0.8792
shear
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1-5
-10
Axis Title
without bracings
Graph 6.18 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 5 soil-3.
20. DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Table 6.19 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-4, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Displacement
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 99.9 46.1
14 96.1 42.4
13 91 38.6
12 84.5 34.6
11 76.9 30.7
10 69.6 26.7
9 63.3 22.8
8 56.6 19
7 49.5 15.3
6 42.1 11.9
5 34.4 8.7
4 26.6 5.9
3 18.7 3.5
2 11.1 1.6
1 3.6 0.3
dispalcement vs no. of stories zone-4
soil-1 in dynamic analysis
without bracings
with bracings
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
No. of stories
Graph 6.19 Variation of displacement with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil -1.
21. Table 6.20 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-4, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Displacementinmm
150
100
50
0
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 136.5 52.6
14 131.2 48.4
13 124 44
12 114.9 39.5
11 104.3 35
10 94.1 30.5
9 85.7 26.1
8 76.6 21.7
7 67 17.5
6 57 13.6
5 46.5 9.9
4 35.9 6.7
3 25.4 4
2 15 1.8
1 4.9 0.4
base 3.21 0
Dispacement Vs No of stories zone-4
soil-2 in Dynamic analysis
WITHOUT BRACINGS
No of stories
Graph 6.20 Variation of displacement with bracings & without bracings
in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil -1.
22. Table 6.21 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-4, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
DISPLACEMENT
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 117.2 0.001379
14 113.9 0.001284
13 109.7 0.001181
12 104.5 0.001075
11 98.3 0.000965
10 91.2 0.0008535
9 83.3 0.0007417
8 74.6 0.0006313
7 65.4 0.000524
6 55.6 0.0004216
5 45.5 0.0003262
4 35.1 0.0002395
3 24.8 0.000164
2 14.5 9.45E-05
1 4.7 3.41E-05
base 0 0
RESPONSE -- DISPLACEMENT
150
100
50
0
Axis Title
Series2
Graph 6.21 Variation of moment with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-1.
23. Table 6.22 Comparative values of moment in dynamic analysis along
zone-4, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
2
0
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 -9.2296 -1.9478
14 -4.8406 -0.3926
13 -5.4935 -0.3828
12 -5.2234 -1.0989
11 -5.0506 -1.226
10 -8.5803 -2.9796
9 -6.3566 -3.6886
8 -6.4109 -4.4411
7 -6.0657 -5.1335
6 -5.7627 -5.8286
5 -5.4208 -6.4226
4 -5.045 -6.9836
3 -4.6259 -8.1068
2 -4.1359 -4.6891
1 -3.6167 1.2645
base 0 0
moment vs no. of stories zone-4
soil-1 in dynamic analysis
Moment
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
No. of stories
without bracings
Graph 6.22 Variation of moment with bracings & without bracings in
linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-1.
24. Table 6.23 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-4, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Moment
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 1.1287 0.2799
13 2.0125 1.0728
12 3.0112 2.3594
11 4.1779 4.2441
10 5.2709 5.5117
9 6.3244 13.3267
8 7 16.7543
7 7.9663 21.2967
6 8.8516 26.0712
5 9.6189 31.0919
4 10.2299 36.3313
3 10.6398 41.2792
2 10.7991 49.4821
1 10.4012 36.0179
base 7.6687 16.1809
Moment Vs No of stories zone-4 soil-2
in Dynamic analysis
60
40
20 WITHOUT BRACINGS
0
No of stories
Graph 6.23 Variation of moment with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-2.
25. Table 6.24 Comparative values of moment in dynamic analysis along
zone-4, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
MOMENT
10
8
6
4
2
0
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 1.18 0.14
13 1.9 0.24
12 2.79 0.5
11 3.52 0.71
10 4.48 0.91
9 5.49 1.08
8 6.42 1.24
7 7.27 1.38
6 8.02 1.49
5 8.64 1.59
4 9.11 1.68
3 9.43 1.75
2 9.5 1.82
1 9.35 1.81
base 5.51 2.04
RESPONSE -- MOMENT
Series1
Graph 6.24 Variation of moment with bracings & without bracings in
linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-3.
26. Table 6.25 Comparative values of shear in dynamic analysis along zone-
4, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Shear
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 -9.9128 -1.8878
14 -4.0191 -0.4966
13 -3.1903 -0.031
12 -1.444 0.5467
11 -0.5096 1.0272
10 -4.7948 2.4997
9 -1.5591 3.0007
8 -0.6183 3.6943
7 0.5067 4.3082
6 1.5021 4.8986
5 2.4555 5.4824
4 3.3978 6.0241
3 4.3525 6.9737
2 5.4299 5.9057
1 6.0021 0.0013
base 0 0
Shear vs no. of stories zone-4
soil-1 in dynamic analysis
with bracings
No. of stoires
Graph 6.25 Variation of shear with bracings & without bracings in linear
static analysis along Zone 4 soil-1
27. Table 6.26 Comparative values of shear in dynamic analysis along
zone-4, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Shearforce
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 7.3502 0.0297
13 18.2769 0.915
12 27.0614 1.0159
11 36.2086 0.7824
10 46.4265 1.1774
9 51.0367 2.5777
8 62.7406 1.6643
7 69.8711 0.6867
6 76.4887 0.8095
5 81.9491 2.3872
4 86.3218 4.2268
3 89.5393 6.0502
2 91.5717 9.0784
1 92.0187 4.0008
base 91.295 14.5967
Shear force Vs No of stories zone-4 soil-
2 in Dynamic analysis
100
80
60
40
WITHOUT BRACING S20
0 WITH BRACINGS
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.26 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-2.
28. Table 6.27 Comparative values of shear in dynamic analysis along zone-
4, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
SHEAR
No of storie s
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 5.84 0
13 14.92 0.13
12 22.05 0.17
11 29.12 0.32
10 35.67 0.53
9 41.75 2.48
8 47.27 2.87
7 52.19 3.08
6 56.45 3.13
5 60.01 6.06
4 62.82 8.16
3 64.89 10.32
2 66.15 12.7
1 67.24 14.34
base 60.99 12.42
RESPONSE -- SHEAR
80
60
40
20
0
Series2
Graph 6.27 Variation of shear with bracings & without bracings in linear
static analysis along Zone 4 soil-3.
29. Table 6.28 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-5, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Displacementinmm
No of storie s
with out bracings with bracing
15 149.8 69.2
14 144.1 63.6
13 136.4 57.8
12 126.7 51.9
11 115.4 46
10 104. 3 40.1
9 95 34.2
8 85 28.5
7 74.3 23
6 63.1 17.8
5 51.6 13
4 39.8 8.8
3 28.1 5.2
2 16.6 2.4
1 5.5 0.5
base 0 0
Displacement Vs No of stories zone-5
soil-1 in Dynamic analysis
200
150
100
WITHO UT BRACING S50
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.28 Variation of displacement with bracings &
without bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 5
soil -1.
30. Table 6.29 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-5, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Displacementinmm
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 201.2 81.4
14 193.6 74.8
13 183.2 68
12 170.1 61.1
11 154.9 54.1
10 140 47.1
9 127.4 40.3
8 114.1 33.5
7 99.8 27.1
6 84.8 20.9
5 69.3 15.3
4 53.5 10.4
3 37.8 6.1
2 22.3 2.8
1 7.4 0.6
base 0 0
Displacement Vs No of stories zone 5
soil 2 in Dynamic analysis
300
200
100 WITHO UT BRACING S
0 15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.29 Variation of displacement with bracings & without bracings
in linear static analysis along Zone 5 soil -2.
31. Table 6.30 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-5, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 251.4 92.1
14 241.7 85.8
13 228.4 79.1
12 211.6 72.1
11 192.1 64.9
10 173.4 57.5
9 157.8 50.1
8 141.2 42.6
7 123.5 35.3
6 104.9 28.1
5 85.7 21.3
4 66.2 15
3 46.7 9.4
2 27.6 4.7
1 9.1 1.1
base 0 0
Displacementinmm
300 displacment zone 5 soil 3
250
200
150
WITHOUT BRACING S
100 WITH BRACINGS
50
0
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
No of stories
Graph 6.30 Variation of displacement with bracings &
without bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 5
soil -3.
32. Table 6.31 Comparative values of moment in dynamic analysis along
zone-5, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Moment
80
60
40
20
0
No of stories
with out bracings with
bracing
15 0 0
14 1.1132 0.4053
13 2.1162 1.5037
12 3.2219 3.2808
11 4.4944 5.9251
10 5.6232 7.3715
9 6.8659 17.5538
8 7.6419 22.0868
7 8.7015 28.0523
6 9.6865 34.3207
5 10.531 40.9086
4 11.2027 47.7811
3 11.6532 54.2693
2 11.828 65.0312
1 11.3927 47.3405
base 8.3976 21.2429
Moment Vs No of stories zone-5
soil-1 in Dynamic analysis
WITHOUT BRACINGS
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.31 Variation of moment with bracings &
without bracings in dynamic
analysis along Zone 5 soil-1.
33. Table 6.32 Comparative values of moment in dynamic analysis along
zone-5, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 201.2 81.4
14 193.6 74.8
13 183.2 68
12 170.1 61.1
11 154.9 54.1
10 140 47.1
9 127.4 40.3
8 114.1 33.5
7 99.8 27.1
6 84.8 20.9
5 69.3 15.3
4 53.5 10.4
3 37.8 6.1
2 22.3 2.8
1 7.4 0.6
base 0 0
Displacementinmm
Displacement Vs No of stories zone 5
soil 2 in Dynamic analysis
300
200
100 WITHO UT BRACING S
0 WITH BRACINGS
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.32 Variation of displacement with bracings & without bracings
in dynamic analysis along Zone 5 soil-2.
34. Table 6.33 Comparative values of moment in dynamic analysis along
zone-5, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 4.2682 3.1126
14 3.4428 4.3699
13 3.5379 6.6909
12 3.4723 9.5912
11 3.3336 13.6734
10 5.6909 32.2662
9 5.1171 44.6132
8 5.002 52.0788
7 4.797 59.5223
6 4.567 66.9492
5 4.3112 66.9492
4 4.0175 72479
3 3.6868 80.9252
2 3.2423 54.7716
1 3.053 26.87
base 0 0
AxisTitle
Moment Vs No of stories zone-5
soil-
3 in Dynamic anlysis
100
50
0 WITH BRACINGS
Axis Title
Graph 6.33 Variation of moment with bracings & without bracings in
dynamic analysis along Zone 5 soil-3
35. Table 6.34 Comparative values of shear in dynamic analysis along
zone-5, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Shearforce
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 8.3645 0.0867
13 20.4661 1.2753
12 30.2465 1.4233
11 40.3775 1.1146
10 51.8078 1.5615
9 56.9065 3.4099
8 69.6882 2.1683
7 77.5767 0.862
6 84.8861 1.0535
5 90.9206 3.1449
4 95.7518 5.5639
3 99.306 7.9572
2 101.5505 11.9296
1 102.041 5.2572
base 101.2421 19.1719
Shear force Vs No of stories zone-5
soil-1 in Dynamic analysis
150
100
50 WITHO UT BRACING S
0
WITH BRACINGS
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.34 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in dynamic analysis along Zone 5 soil-1.
36. Table 6.35 Comparative values of shear in dynamic analysis along zone-
5, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
shearforce
No of storie s
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 12.4292 0.1101
13 28.7774 1.4619
12 41.9959 1.6045
11 55.8756 1.1974
10 71.9689 1.6646
9 78.1866 3.6586
8 96.289 2.1441
7 106.7411 0.5133
6 116.5427 1.7723
5 124.5559 4.3642
4 130.9119 7.3178
3 135.5039 10.2291
2 138.2943 15.0389
1 138.5338 7.0249
base 137.244 23.1543
Shear Vs No of stories zone 5 soil 2 in
Dynamic analysis
150
100
50 WITHO UT BRACING S
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.35 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in dynamic analysis along Zone 5 soil-2.
37. Table 6.36 Comparative values of shear in dynamic analysis along zone-
5, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
shearforce
25
20
15
10
5
0
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 3.3322 0.1129
14 2.2076 3.1159
13 2.3818 4.1446
12 2.3125 4.406
11 2.2889 7.1143
10 4.864 13.8847
9 3.3806 13.6741
8 3.3586 13.4609
7 3.2102 12.74095
6 3.0645 106781
5 2.8954 8.2496
4 2.7044 5.46
3 2.4867 0.1416
2 2.2093 9.6931
1 2.0447 19.7242
base 1.108 17.1236
shear zone 5 soil 3 dynamic analysis
WITHOUT BRACINGS
No of stories
Graph 6.36 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in dynamic analysis along Zone 5 soil-3.
38. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.37
Comparison v
soil 1 displacement
with bracings
zone 4
Without bracings
20.1 10
zone 5 29.3 14.6
soil 1 displacement
zone 4 zone 5
29.3
20.1
10 14.6
with bracings
Graph 6.37 Comp rison values of displacement in linear sta ic analysis
along zone 4 an zone 5 soil 1 with bracings and without bracing
39. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.38
Compari
soil 1 moment
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
9.6867 1.9812
9.1865 1.9644
zone 5
of zone 4&5
9.1865
1.9812 1.9644
Graph 6.38 Compa ison values of moment in linear static
ana ysis along zone 4 and z ne 5 soil 1 with bracings and
without brac ng
40. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.39
Soil 1 shear
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
6.7641 1.2852
9.1716 1.8781
zone 5
zone 4&5
9.1716
1.2852 1.8781
zone 5
Graph 6.39 Compar son values of shear in linear static
analysi along zone 4 and zon 5 soil 1 with bracings and
without bracin s
41. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.40
Co
soil 2 displacement
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
26.9 11.7
201.2 81.4
zone 5
displacement in zone 4&5
201.2 81.4
11.7
Graph 6.40 Comp rison values of displacement in linea stat
c analysis along zone 4 an zone 5 soil 2 with bracings and
without bracing
42. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.41
Compari
soil 2 moment
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
9.6867 1.9812
1.4863 0.4785
zone 5
zone 4 zone 5
1.4863 1.9812
0.4785
with bracings
Graph 6.41 Compa ison values of moment in linear static
ana ysis along zone 4 and z ne 5 soil 2 with bracings and
without brac ng
43. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.42 Compa
soil 2 shear
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
9.1318 1.8833
12.4292 0.1101
zone 5
soil 2 shear comparision
9.1318 12.4292
1.8833 0.1101
Graph 6.42 Compar son values of shear in linear static
analysi along zone 4 and zon 5 soil 2 with bracings and
without bracin s
44. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.43
Comparison values
soil 3 displacement
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
0.9 0.5
49.9 24.6
zone 5
zone 4 zone 5
49.9
24.6
0.5
Graph 6.43 Comp rison values of displacement in linear stat c analysis
along zone 4 an zone 5 soil 3 with bracings and without bracing
45. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.44 Compari
soil 3 moment
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
11.13 2.69
13.5198 3.8554
zone 5
13.5198
2.69 3.8554
with bracings
Graph 6.44 Compa ison values of moment in linear static ana ysis along
zone 4 and z ne 5 soil 3 with bracings and without brac ng
46. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.45
Compa
soil 3 shear
Without bracings
0
11.2601 0.8792
soil 3 shear comparision
zone 4 zone 5
11.2601
0 2.37 0.8792
with bracings
Graph 6.45 Compar son values of shear in linear static analysi along
zone 4 and zon 5 soil 3 with bracings and without bracin s
47. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.46
soil 1 displac em nt
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
99.9 46.1
149.8 69.2
zone 5
comparision
99.9
149.8
69.246.1
Graph 6.46 Compar son values of displacement in dynamic an lysis
along zone 4 and z ne 5 soil 1 with bracings and without bra ing
48. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.47
zone 4
zone 5
9.1865 9.2296
1.9644 1.9478
Graph 6.47 Compar son values of moment in dynamic analysi along
zone 4 and zon 5 soil 1 with bracings and without bracin s
49. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.48
r in dynamic
zone 4
zone 5
8.3645 9.9128
0.0867 1.8878
Graph 6.48 Comp rison values of shear in dynamic analysis long zone 4
and zon 5 soil 1 with bracings and without bracin s
Dr.K.V.S.R.I.T Knl
Page 105
50. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.49
zone 4
zone 5
comparision
201.2 136.5 81.4 52.6
withoutbracings with bracings
Graph 6.49 Compar son values of displacement in dynamic an lysis
along zone 4 and z ne 5 soil 2 with bracings and without brac ng
51. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.50
Compari
zone 4
zone 5
1.4863
zone 4 zone 5
1.1287 0.4785
0.2799
withoutbracings with bracings
Graph 6.50 Compa ison values of moment in dynamic analysi along
zone 4 and zon 5 soil 2 with bracings and without bracin s
52. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.51
Compari
zone 4
zone 5
zone 4 zone 5
7.3502
0.1101 0.0297
with bracings
Graph 6.51 Comp rison values of shear in dynamic analysis long zone 4
and zon 5 soil 2 with bracings and without bracin s
53. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.52
soil 3 displacement
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
117.2 0.001379
251.4 92.1
zone 5
comparision
251.4
117.2 92.1 0.001379
Graph 6.52 Compar son values of displacement in dynamic an lysis
along zone 4 and z ne 5 soil 3 with bracings and without brac ng
54. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.53
Comparis
soil 3 moment
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
1.18 0.14
4.2682 3.1126
zone 5
zone 4 zone 5
4.2682
3.1126
1.18
0.14
with bracings
Graph 6.53 Compar son values of moment in dynamic analysi along
zone 4 and zon 5 soil 3 with bracings and without bracin s
55. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.54 Compari
soil 3 shear
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
5.84 0
3.3322 0.1129
zone 5
5.84
3.3322
0.1129 0
Graph 6.54 Comp rison values of shear in dynamic analysis long zone 4
and zon 5 soil 3 with bracings and without bracin s