Responsible design_presentation
•
0 likes•26 views
Part of a seminar series on Healthy Buildings
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (15)
Similar to Responsible design_presentation
Similar to Responsible design_presentation (20)
More from Richard Cotterill
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Responsible design_presentation
- 2. 500 staff operating from 19 UK offices, including London, Birmingham, Manchester and Bristol. Proud of our employee- focused culture – recognised in 2017 in the Sunday Times 100 Best Companies to Work For.
- 3. Sectors Aviation Healthcare Public Sector Commercial Heritage Regeneration Defence Industrial Residential Education Logistics and Distribution Retail and Leisure Energy Nuclear Utilities
- 4. Our Services Building Performance Engineering Geotechnics Infrastructure and Civils Structural Engineering Environmental Nuclear Management Consultancy Flood Risk Transportation Land Quality Land Remediation Groundwater Remediation Asbestos Remediation and Management
- 5. English National Ballet, London City Island Logistics Centre for Rolls Royce, Bognor Regis Dolffin Quay, Cardiff Bay Manchester Life, Manchester
- 6. Smarter Building Seminar Series Take the path to responsible design Designing healthy buildings Get the most out of benchmarking Zero carbon strategies
- 7. Pathway to responsible design Hydrock BPE Breakfast Seminar Series
- 8. 8 Why
- 9. 9 Ecological footprint 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 0 1B 2B 3B 4B 5B 6B 7B 8B 0 5B 10B 15B 20B 25BGLOBALHECTARES POPULATION Earth's Biological Capacity Total FootprintWorld Population Grazing Land Forest Products Built-up Land Cropland Fishing Grounds Carbon
- 10. 10 Ecological footprint 0 1B 2B 3B 4B 5B 6B 7B 8B 0 5B 10B 15B 20B 25B 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 GLOBALHECTARES POPULATION Earth's Biological Capacity Total FootprintWorld Population Ecological Reserve Ecological Deficit
- 12. 12 Our current path Source : Living Planet Report WWF 2012 2030 2.9 Earths to replenish our annual resource use 20502017 1.7 Earths to replenish our annual resource use
- 13. 13 Where are we headed? Source https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2610164/ 25(c) 25(c) 2002globalhectares(billion) 20 15 10 5 0 1960 210020802060204020202000 ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT BIOCAPACITY 1980 25(c) 2002globalhectares(billion) 20 15 10 5 0 ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT BIOCAPACITY 25(c) 2002globalhectares(billion) 20 15 10 5 0 1960 2100208020602040202020001980 ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT BIOCAPACITY 25(c) 2002globalhectares(billion) 20 15 10 5 0 1960 210020802060204020202000 ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT BIOCAPACITY 1980 25(c) 2002globalhectares(billion) 20 15 10 5 0 1960 2100208020602040202020001980 ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT BIOCAPACITY 25(c) 2002globalhectares(billion) 20 15 10 5 0 1960 2100208020602040202020001980 ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT BIOCAPACITY 2002gl 5 0 1960 2100208020602040202020001980 25(c) 2002globalhectares(billion) 20 15 10 5 0 1960 2100208020602040202020001980 ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT BIOCAPACITY Business as usual Slow Shift Rapid reduction
- 14. 14 Moving towards sustainability Paris Agreement ƒƒ Keep increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. Target 1.5°C ƒƒ GHG to peak as soon as possible What this means ƒƒ GHG must peak before 2030 to meet 2°C by 2050 (Net Zero new construction) ƒƒ All buildings to need to be net zero by 2050
- 15. 15 Moving beyond sustainability Conventional Design APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN UK: Green Design Sustainable Design Restorative Design Regenerative Design One step better than breaking the law Code Relative improvement BREEAM Neutral, 100% less bad Living Building Challenge Humans doing things to nature Assisting the evolution of sub-systems Humans enhancing ecosystems through participation as nature Co-evolution of the whole system 75% 25% <1% <.1% <.01% Adapted by Thrive Design Studio from Bill Reed. Global footprinting: http://www.footprintnetwork.org. Construction stats from McGraw-Hill’ “Green Outlook 2011” report Increasing societal demand for ecosystem services Degenerating life-supporting systems Sustaining a degraded planet Regenerating past, present and continued impacts
- 16. 16 Moving towards responsible design EARLY ENGAGEMENT HIGH PERFORMANCE ENERGY CAPITAL COST RUNNING COSTS ECOLOGICAL HEALTH
- 17. 17 Moving towards responsible design EARLY ENGAGEMENT HIGH PERFORMANCE ENERGY CAPITAL COST RUNNING COSTS ECOLOGICAL HEALTH
- 18. 18 Development brief Key Project Requirements ƒƒ 11,000 sqm net office ƒƒ Low running cost ƒƒ Flexible work environment ƒƒ BREEAM Excellent ƒƒ Maximise Daylight ƒƒ Passive Solar Design
- 19. 19 8760 8760 8760 8760 8760 8751 8735 8669 8513 8327 7930 7502 6926 6114 5160 3973 2784 385 175 74 20 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1709 859 >-20 >-18 >-16 >-14 >-12 >-10 >-8 >-6 >-4 >-2 >0 >2 >4 >6 >8 >10 >12 >14 >16 >18 >20 >22 >24 >26 >28 >30 >32 >34 >36 >38 >40 Comfort Zone Number of hours requiring cooling with conventional HVAC system Number of hours requiring cooling with displacement system NumberofHours Above Temperature [°C] Annual Number of Hours above Temperature(SI) Location: BRISTOL 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 Natural ventilation potential
- 20. 20 Natural ventilation potential Summer AM Summer PM 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0º NORTH 10º 20º 30º 40º 50º 60º 70º 80º 90º EAST 100º 110º 120º 130º 140º 150º 160º 170º 180º SOUTH 190º 200º 210º 220º 230º 240º 250º 260º 270º WEST 280º 290º 300º 310º 320º 330º 340º 350º 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0º NORTH 10º 20º 30º 40º 50º 60º 70º 80º 90º EAST 100º 110º 120º 130º 140º 150º 160º 170º 180º SOUTH 190º 200º 210º 220º 230º 240º 250º 260º 270º WEST 280º 290º 300º 310º 320º 330º 340º 350º All <1 0m/ s <7 .5 m/ s <5 m/ s <2 .5 m/ s
- 21. 21 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Temperature[°C] 0101 0201 0304 0404 0505 0605 0706 0806 0906 1007 1107 1208 Date Annual Min & Max Temperatures Minimum Temperatures Maximum Temperatures Location: BRISTOL Thermal mass potential
- 22. 22 Current office stock Annual energy cost £/m2 18 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 61 Heating kWh/m2 79 Electricity kWh/m2 84 ƒƒ Data based on current ‘in-use’ buildings running data. ƒƒ New construction to Part L 2013 regulations likely to provide an improvement on this, particularly in thermal performance. ƒƒ Source: CIBSE TM46 (2008) Energy Benchmarks, CIBSE Guide F (2011) Energy Efficiency in Buildings.
- 23. 23 Initial brief Annual energy cost £/m2 11.2 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 37 Electricity kWh/m2 85 Daylight Factor (%) 3.7 Heating kWh/m2 8 FOUR PIPE FAN COIL SYSTEM
- 24. 24 Proposed solution Annual energy cost £/m2 3.5 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 11.7 Heating kWh/m2 9.1 Electricity kWh/m2 18.9 UDI 100-2000 lx 57%
- 25. 25 Massing and orientation CASE A Orientation fixed due to site footprint All fabric and systems match the Part L2 notional building Assuming openable windows with background mechanical ventilation Glazing is notional 40% Basic office block form maximising site footprint 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Carbon Emissions Heating Lighting Fan Cooling Pumps Annual energy cost £/m2 11.2 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 37 Electricity kWh/m2 85 Daylight Factor (%) 3.7 Heating kWh/m2 8
- 26. 26 Massing and orientation CASE B All fabric and systems match the Part L2 notional building Assuming openable windows with background mechanical ventilation Form altered to increase public realm around building Glazing is notional 40% 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Carbon emissions Heating Lighting Fan Cooling Pumps Annual energy cost £/m2 11.3 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 38 Heating kWh/m2 11 Electricity kWh/m2 84 Daylight Factor (%) 4.6 Electricity kWh/m2 1% Heating kWh/m2 -38% Carbon kgCO2 /m2 -3% Cost £/m2 -1% Daylight factor 24%
- 27. 27 Massing and orientation CASE C All fabric and systems match the Part L2 notional building Assuming openable windows with background mechanical ventilation Form altered to increase daylight penetration and facilitate natural ventilation Glazing is notional 40% More architecturally interesting 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Carbon Emissions Heating Lighting Fan Cooling Pumps Electricity kWh/m2 47 Annual energy cost £/m2 9.9 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 33 Heating kWh/m2 9 Daylight Factor (%) 5.7 Electricity kWh/m2 45% Heating kWh/m2 -13% Carbon kgCO2 /m2 11% Cost £/m2 12% Daylight factor 54%
- 28. 28 Massing and orientation CASE D All fabric and systems match the Part L2 notional building Area of glazing has been changed to fit architects vision and improve daylight Assuming openable windows with background mechanical ventilation 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Carbon Emissions Heating Lighting Fan Cooling Pumps Electricity kWh/m2 47 Annual energy cost £/m2 7.7 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 26 Daylight Factor (%) 8.08Heating kWh/m2 4 Electricity kWh/m2 45% Heating kWh/m2 50% Carbon kgCO2 /m2 30% Cost £/m2 31% Daylight factor 118%
- 29. 29 Massing and orientation - summary HIGH PERFORMANCE ENERGY CAPITAL COST RUNNING COSTS ECOLOGICAL HEALTH HIGH PERFORMANCE HIGH PERFORMANCE HIGH PERFORMANCE CASE A CASE B CASE C CASE D
- 30. 30 Massing and orientation - summary CASE A CASE B CASE C CASE D HIGH PERFORMANCE ENERGY CAPITAL COST RUNNING COSTS ECOLOGICAL HEALTH HIGH PERFORMANCE HIGH PERFORMANCE HIGH PERFORMANCE
- 31. 31 Façade optimisation CASE A NOTIONAL PARAMETERS U-VALUES Roof 0.18 W/m2 K Wall 0.26 W/m2 K Floor 0.22 W/m2 K Window 1.6 W/m2 K AIR PERMEABILITY 5 m3/h m2 at 50 Pa WINDOW G-value 0.4 Light transmittance 0.7 SHADING DEVICES No shading Electricity kWh/m2 47 Annual energy cost £/m2 7.7 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 26 UDI 100-2000 lx 54%Heating kWh/m2 4 Electricity kWh/m2 45% Heating kWh/m2 50% Carbon kgCO2 /m2 30% Cost £/m2 31% UDI -
- 32. 32 Façade optimisation CASE B: PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS U-VALUES Roof 0.15 W/m2 K Wall 0.15 W/m2 K Floor 0.15 W/m2 K Window 1.4 W/m2 K AIR PERMEABILITY 3 m3/h m2 at 50 Pa WINDOW G-value 0.4 Light transmittance 0.69 SHADING DEVICES Horizontal shading Annual energy cost £/m2 7.5 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 25 Heating kWh/m2 3 Electricity kWh/m2 47 UDI 100-2000 lx 57% Electricity kWh/m2 45% Heating kWh/m2 63% Carbon kgCO2 /m2 32% Cost £/m2 33% UDI 12%
- 33. 33 Façade optimisation CASE C: ENHANCE PARAMETERS U-VALUES Roof 0.11 W/m2 K Wall 0.11 W/m2 K Floor 0.11 W/m2 K Window 1.1 W/m2 K AIR PERMEABILITY 0.6 m3/h m2 at 50 Pa WINDOW G-value 0.18 Light transmittance 0.33 SHADING DEVICES Horizontal shading Annual energy cost £/m2 7.9 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 26 Heating kWh/m2 2 Electricity kWh/m2 49 UDI 100-2000 lx 51% Electricity kWh/m2 42% Heating kWh/m2 75% Carbon kgCO2 /m2 30% Cost £/m2 29% UDI 6%
- 34. 34 Façade optimisation - summary HIGH PERFORMANCE ENERGY CAPITAL COST RUNNING COSTS ECOLOGICAL HEALTH HIGH PERFORMANCE HIGH PERFORMANCE CASE A CASE B CASE C
- 35. 35 Façade optimisation - summary CASE A CASE B CASE C HIGH PERFORMANCE ENERGY CAPITAL COST RUNNING COSTS ECOLOGICAL HEALTH HIGH PERFORMANCE HIGH PERFORMANCE
- 36. 36 Daylight control PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS U-VALUES Roof 0.15 W/m2 K Wall 0.15 W/m2 K Floor 0.15 W/m2 K Window 1.4 W/m2 K AIR PERMEABILITY 3 m3/h m2 at 50 Pa WINDOW G-value 0.4 Light transmittance 0.69 SHADING DEVICES Horizontal shading Annual energy cost £/m2 4.8 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 16 Heating kWh/m2 2.31 Electricity kWh/m2 31 UDI 100-2000 lx 57% 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Daylight Dimming Example of perimeter lighting load based on daylight control 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Electricity kWh/m2 64% Heating kWh/m2 71% Carbon kgCO2 /m2 57% Cost £/m2 57% UDI 12%
- 37. 37 Passive strategies -natural ventilation Annual energy cost £/m2 1.7 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 6.1 Heating kWh/m2 11.7 Electricity kWh/m2 7 UDI 100-2000 lx 57% CASE A: Electricity kWh/m2 92% Heating kWh/m2 -50% Carbon kgCO2 /m2 84% Cost £/m2 85% UDI 12%
- 38. 38 Passive strategies -mixed mode Annual energy cost £/m2 3.5 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 11.7 Heating kWh/m2 9.1 Electricity kWh/m2 18.9 UDI 100-2000 lx 57% CASE B: Electricity kWh/m2 78% Heating kWh/m2 -13% Carbon kgCO2 /m2 68% Cost £/m2 69% UDI 12%
- 39. 39 Passive strategies - earth duct AHU Annual energy cost £/m2 2.3 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 7.7 Heating kWh/m2 4.8 Electricity kWh/m2 13.0 UDI 100-2000 lx 57% CASE C: Electricity kWh/m2 85% Heating kWh/m2 38% Carbon kgCO2 /m2 78% Cost £/m2 79% UDI 12%
- 40. 40 Passive strategies - labyrinth AHU Annual energy cost £/m2 2.3 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 7.7 Heating kWh/m2 4.8 Electricity kWh/m2 13.0 UDI 100-2000 lx 57% CASE D: Electricity kWh/m2 85% Heating kWh/m2 38% Carbon kgCO2 /m2 78% Cost £/m2 79% UDI 12%
- 41. 41 Passive strategy - summary HIGH PERFORMANCE ENERGY CAPITAL COST RUNNING COSTS ECOLOGICAL HEALTH HIGH PERFORMANCE HIGH PERFORMANCE HIGH PERFORMANCE CASE A CASE B CASE C CASE D
- 42. 42 Passive strategy - summary CASE A CASE B CASE C CASE D HIGH PERFORMANCE ENERGY CAPITAL COST RUNNING COSTS ECOLOGICAL HEALTH HIGH PERFORMANCE HIGH PERFORMANCE HIGH PERFORMANCE
- 43. 43 Proposed solution Annual energy cost £/m2 3.5 Carbon kg CO2 /m2 11.7 Heating kWh/m2 9.1 Electricity kWh/m2 18.9 UDI 100-2000 lx 57% Electricity kWh/m2 78% Heating kWh/m2 -13% Carbon kgCO2 /m2 68% Cost £/m2 69% UDI 12% HIGH PERFORMANCE ENERGY CAPITAL COST RUNNING COSTS ECOLOGICALHEALTH
- 44. 44 Design methodology CARBON NEUTRAL CARBON POSITIVE BEYOND THE BUILDING CLIMATE MASSING+ENVELOPE THERMALCOMFORT+ CONDITIONING LIGHTING EQUIPMENT ENERGYPRODUCTION +RENEWABLES COMMISSIONING WATER OFFSETS MEASUREMENT+ VERIFICATION EDUCATION+ TRAINING LANDSCAPE CONVENTIONALDESIGN EMBODIED CARBON TRANSPORTATION PURCHASING FOOD
- 45. 45 Design methodology CARBON NEUTRAL CARBON POSITIVE BEYOND THE BUILDING CLIMATE MASSING+ENVELOPE THERMALCOMFORT+ CONDITIONING LIGHTING EQUIPMENT ENERGYPRODUCTION +RENEWABLES COMMISSIONING WATER OFFSETS MEASUREMENT+ VERIFICATION EDUCATION+ TRAINING LANDSCAPE CONVENTIONALDESIGN EMBODIED CARBON TRANSPORTATION PURCHASING FOOD Diurnal Swing Psychometrics Temp profiles Natural vent potential Massing for passive design Daylight access + glare Façade performance Shading + Solar gains Efficient MEP Mixed-mode ventilation Adaptive comfort model Thermal mass potential Adaptive Light Levels Controls Daylight Integration Design Criteria Plug Loads Equipment Selection Controls +Scheduling Water + Energy synergies Conservation Reuse Microclimate design Water + Storm water management Mitigate heat island effect Efficient Heat/Cooling plant Ground coupled systems District systems Renewables Post construction + post occupancy evaluation Owners project requirements Metering + Sensing User feedback User manuals Staff training Building user training Carbon offsets Green power
- 46. 46 Hydrock Team HYDROCK | LONDON 22 Long Acre | London | WC2E 9LY 020 3846 8456