Research Paper.Research paper should be between 5 and 7 pa.docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•2 views

Research Paper . Research paper should be between 5 and 7 pages . Double space Submission deadline is last day of class . No Footnote s but a Bibliography is required . i.e. where you received information from - possible sources include: newspapers, magazines, books, research papers etc. etc. (For Example) Bibliography Aharoni,Y. 1966. The Foreign Investment Decision Process. Harvard University Press, Boston. John, Doe. 2010. Trade With China . New York Times. January 21, P.7. Research methods: research paper basically mean that students are conducting research again (re: means again). But what is important in your Search are the methods employed, the data and your personal conclusion which is yours and should be unique. 1. Introduction – state the problem 2. Body research - problem, data, information 3. Cite other authors – point view, methods research 4. Conclusion – your perspective – based on research .

Education

Search are the methods employed, the data and your personal
conclusion which is yours and should be unique.
1.
Introduction – state the problem
2.
Body research - problem, data, information
3.
Cite other authors – point view, methods research
4.
Conclusion – your perspective – based on research

Research Paper . topic: US Exports and imports world Research paper should be at least 6 pages. Double space Submission deadline is last day of class. No Footnote s but a Bibliography is required. i.e. where you received information from - possible sources include: newspapers, magazines, books, research papers etc. etc. (For Example) Bibliography Aharoni,Y. 1966. The Foreign Investment Decision Process. Harvard University Press, Boston. John, Doe. 2010. Trade With China . New York Times. January 21, P.7. Research methods: research paper basically mean that students are conducting research again (re: means again). But what is important in your Search are the methods employed, the data and your personal conclusion which is yours and should be unique. Introduction – state the problem Body research - problem, data, information Cite other authors – point view, methods research Conclusion – your perspective – based on research .

review of related iterature_AR.pptx

MaryYoleAppleDeclaro1

2ND COT PPT related literature.pptx

AnalieCabanlit1

Academic research

RafaelPerezOlivan

Research Project

Transweb Global Inc

How to write and publish good quality research paper

PallawiBulakh1

Case 11 The Case of the Falsified Data Mickey Jordan had .docx

annandleola

Case 11: The Case of the Falsified Data Mickey Jordan had developed a collaborative social-impact assessment project involving two colleagues and three students. The six-person team was responsible for collecting field data in a wide geographical area at some distance from their university. Each person was responsible for a specific region. The data were fed, by region, into a computer on a weekly basis and monthly meetings were held so that progress reports could be made by team members. At these meetings, names of individuals who had been interviewed during the preceding period were given as a means of checking off the list of identified community specialists, so that the overall progress of the project could be ascertained. Information filed in the computer did not contain informants' names or other identifiers, as a measure for maintaining confidentiality and anonymity of informants. Each member of the team was paid by the funds made available through a contract with a federal agency (the faculty members were able to buy release time from teaching with contract funds). Jordan had an occasion to be in the region assigned to one of the faculty members, Brian Cash, and happened to find himself talking with one of Cash's reported informants, Henry Jones. Jordon took the opportunity to ask Jones for clarification of reported data that had puzzled him. Jones appeared confused and asked Jordan why he was asking him "these questions." Jordan explained that he had been curious about specific details of Cash's report and thought this would be an opportune time to get further information. Jones said that he had never heard of Brian Cash, much less having ever talked to him, and furthermore he did not even know a research project was being conducted in his community. Jordan's Dilemma: Should he accept Jones's statement as a denial of participation in the project to maintain anonymity? Should he accuse Jones of lying? Should he drop the matter for the moment and later tell Cash about the incident? Perhaps Cash had lied about interviewing Jones? Should be confront Cash with this suspicion? Since it was some distance to the field site from the university, should he [Jordan] now seek out other informants Cash had reported on to determine whether or not they had been interviewed? Or, were there other tactics to be employed? 3 Jan. 2019 Research Case Study Paper Instructions, Topics for Case Studies and Required Paper Outline HUMN 330 Purpose of a research case study analytical paper is to: · Examine, research, and resolve a specific moral or ethical case study assigned by the instructor (topic chosen by student – list provided by instructor). Process: · Select a case study topic from a provided list at the end of this document. Must retrieve actual case study from MODULES, COURSE MATERIAL Research Case Study. · Consult the “Point of View” document, find your case, and know the point of .

writing type Agents of change powerpoint sharlawhite

Research the Internet for recent litigation, censures, and fines involving national public accounting firms. Examples of litigation cases against national public accounting firms include fines by regulatory authorities and censures by professional societies. Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you: Analyze the primary accounting issues which form the crux of the litigation or fine for the firm, and indicate the impact to the firm as a result of litigation or fine. Provide support for your rationale. Examine the key inferences of corporate ethics related to internal controls and accounting principles which lead to the litigation or fine for the accounting firm. Evaluate the primary ethical standards of the accounting organization’s leadership and values which contributed to approval of the accounting issues and thus created the litigation or fines in question. Identify specific conduct violations committed by the organization and accounting firm in question. Next, create an argument supporting the actions against the organization and accounting firm, based on the current professional code of conduct for independent auditors and management accountants. Make a recommendation as to how regulators and professional societies may prevent this type of behavior in question for the future. Provide support for your rationale. Use two (2) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Analyze business situations to determine the appropriateness of decision making in terms of professional standards and ethics. Use technology and information resources to research issues in accounting. Write clearly and concisely about accounting using proper writing mechanics. Rubric: Points: 280 Assignment 2: Litigation, Censures, and Fines Criteria Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Analyze the primary accounting issues which form the crux of the litigation or fine for the firm, and indicate the impact to the firm as a result of litigation or fine. Provide support for your rationale. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the primary accounting issues which form the crux of the litigation or fine for the firm, and indicate the impact to the firm as a result of litigation or fine. Did not submit or in.