SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Radio Production Evaluation By Jacob Taylor
WE ARE..
Compared to REAL media products...
...we’re different
...and better!!!
Who and how does it represent?
Representing mainly a student audience Full range of content Not ‘boring’ Easy to follow structure to the bulletin ‘Up-beat’, fast tempo bulletins
We represented them through the content used. The style of beds, jingles and stings. The structure and the way we told the news through the style of the anchor and reporters and of course interviews and vox pops.
Who’d distribute it?
We hoped stations such as Radio 1 would be interested in our genre and that they would distribute it. We feel our bulletin is similar to their current ‘Newsbeat’. However they could benefit from our ideas.
Target Audience?
Focussing mainly on a student audience looking at people between the ages of 13 and 25.  Main focus age 17
How did you attract and address?
Certain decisions we made were made to appeal to the audience:
Structure and content
As a structure we have an intro then news, then music news, then celeb news, then sport, then finishing with an outro. We used the traditional method of having hard news at the top of the bulletin and the content to generally get softer from there on. Also, we had relevant stories to our target audience, for example driving lessons info. We also threw a couple of peculiar stories in there for the audience to ponder.
Jingles, beds and stings
We used any indents of music to our advantage making it catchy and hopefully liked by our audience. We felt the up-beat rhythm is the taste of our audience of today stereotyping their preferences.
Language and script
We used language that was fairly informal and colloquial so our audience can relate to it. However, on the more serious stories we decided to mould the language to the same level of seriousness. In our script we placed a conversation the anchor has with a reporter in the studio to make it more relaxed and to bring our audience back to the reality that we are just like them.
Technologies
What stood out to me was the importance of levels. I didn’t understand how crucial they were and how fragile for that matter. We had to adjust our production a lot because of this.
I also found the software me used in producing the bulletin (Audition) very helpful and efficient.
The main thing though was seeing how it all slotted together in the end and how important it was for all the vox-pops, interviews and sound bites we used.
At the start of the course I thought it would have been an easier task but also longer. We seemed to use time efficiently however hard we found the production.
Preliminary Task
In my preliminary task I guess I was naive and a stranger to production. I had a vague idea of what was needed to happen in that environment as I’ve always been interested in it but there’s so much I didn’t know
I have learnt how important it is to work as a team and how crucial the whole process is.  There isn’t one part of it that shouldn’t be  fulfilled as this will affect the production as a unit I now take more notes and analyse things further along with approaching things will a full working attitude
Final Product...
SOUNDED GREAT!!!
We had a great sense of satisfaction at the end along with complete relief that we had finished it.
We thought it sounded really good once all together and so did the majority of our feedback:
In our feedback we found that it was mostly positive:
“Really good techniques used”
“Good stories”
“Good anchor and reporters”
“Well written and spoken”
“Entertaining to listen to”
“Reached target audience!”
There was minimal negative feedback. We recognised this and agreed with the fact that our anchor and news reporter spoke a bit too fast at times so our audience could not hear some details
Other than that, we achieved what we set out to do!!!
Thanks

More Related Content

What's hot

7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
harrydocwra
 
P27 Production Log
P27 Production LogP27 Production Log
P27 Production Log
MariamAlim00
 
Proposal - FMP
Proposal - FMPProposal - FMP
Proposal - FMP
JoyLucyBuck
 
Coursework development
Coursework developmentCoursework development
Coursework developmentabbsmurray
 
2. proposal
2. proposal2. proposal
2. proposal
Oliver-Ingham
 
7. audio evaluation
7. audio evaluation7. audio evaluation
7. audio evaluation
AllanGodin
 

What's hot (7)

7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
P27 Production Log
P27 Production LogP27 Production Log
P27 Production Log
 
Proposal - FMP
Proposal - FMPProposal - FMP
Proposal - FMP
 
Coursework development
Coursework developmentCoursework development
Coursework development
 
2. proposal
2. proposal2. proposal
2. proposal
 
Question 3
Question 3Question 3
Question 3
 
7. audio evaluation
7. audio evaluation7. audio evaluation
7. audio evaluation
 

Similar to Radio production evaluation jacob

Bearfaced radio production evaluation
Bearfaced radio production evaluationBearfaced radio production evaluation
Bearfaced radio production evaluation
samcolling
 
Evaluation part 1
Evaluation part 1Evaluation part 1
Evaluation part 1fionapearce
 
Evaluation media1b
Evaluation media1bEvaluation media1b
Evaluation media1blalliie
 
Q3
Q3Q3
Evaluation pp
Evaluation ppEvaluation pp
Evaluation ppJoeRobert
 
Unit 4 task 2 evaluation
Unit 4 task 2 evaluationUnit 4 task 2 evaluation
Unit 4 task 2 evaluation
Ondera15
 
Evaluation part 2
Evaluation part 2Evaluation part 2
Evaluation part 2fionapearce
 
Evaluation question 1 presentation
Evaluation question 1 presentationEvaluation question 1 presentation
Evaluation question 1 presentation
a2colc13
 
Evaluation question 3
Evaluation  question 3Evaluation  question 3
Evaluation question 3
a2media15b
 
Question 1 ppt
Question 1 pptQuestion 1 ppt
Question 1 pptmediappts
 
What have we learned from our audience feedback
What have we learned from our audience feedbackWhat have we learned from our audience feedback
What have we learned from our audience feedback
Mason Wills
 
Evaluation Of Podcast
Evaluation Of PodcastEvaluation Of Podcast
Evaluation Of Podcast
gaetan lundula
 
7. evaluation 200606 version 2
7. evaluation 200606 version 27. evaluation 200606 version 2
7. evaluation 200606 version 2
Thea Jennings
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
Daniel Thompson
 
Question 1 - Hiral
Question 1 - HiralQuestion 1 - Hiral
Question 1 - Hiral
nicolehickman
 

Similar to Radio production evaluation jacob (20)

Media
MediaMedia
Media
 
Bearfaced radio production evaluation
Bearfaced radio production evaluationBearfaced radio production evaluation
Bearfaced radio production evaluation
 
Evaluation part 1
Evaluation part 1Evaluation part 1
Evaluation part 1
 
Evaluation media1b
Evaluation media1bEvaluation media1b
Evaluation media1b
 
Q3
Q3Q3
Q3
 
Evaluation pp
Evaluation ppEvaluation pp
Evaluation pp
 
Unit 4 task 2 evaluation
Unit 4 task 2 evaluationUnit 4 task 2 evaluation
Unit 4 task 2 evaluation
 
Evaluation part 2
Evaluation part 2Evaluation part 2
Evaluation part 2
 
Evaluation question 1 presentation
Evaluation question 1 presentationEvaluation question 1 presentation
Evaluation question 1 presentation
 
Evaluation question 3
Evaluation  question 3Evaluation  question 3
Evaluation question 3
 
A2 Evaluation
A2 EvaluationA2 Evaluation
A2 Evaluation
 
A2 Evaluation AW
A2 Evaluation AWA2 Evaluation AW
A2 Evaluation AW
 
A2 Evaluation AW
A2 Evaluation AWA2 Evaluation AW
A2 Evaluation AW
 
Question 1 ppt
Question 1 pptQuestion 1 ppt
Question 1 ppt
 
What have we learned from our audience feedback
What have we learned from our audience feedbackWhat have we learned from our audience feedback
What have we learned from our audience feedback
 
Evaluation Of Podcast
Evaluation Of PodcastEvaluation Of Podcast
Evaluation Of Podcast
 
Question 5
Question 5Question 5
Question 5
 
7. evaluation 200606 version 2
7. evaluation 200606 version 27. evaluation 200606 version 2
7. evaluation 200606 version 2
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Question 1 - Hiral
Question 1 - HiralQuestion 1 - Hiral
Question 1 - Hiral
 

Radio production evaluation jacob

  • 1. Radio Production Evaluation By Jacob Taylor
  • 3. Compared to REAL media products...
  • 6. Who and how does it represent?
  • 7. Representing mainly a student audience Full range of content Not ‘boring’ Easy to follow structure to the bulletin ‘Up-beat’, fast tempo bulletins
  • 8. We represented them through the content used. The style of beds, jingles and stings. The structure and the way we told the news through the style of the anchor and reporters and of course interviews and vox pops.
  • 10. We hoped stations such as Radio 1 would be interested in our genre and that they would distribute it. We feel our bulletin is similar to their current ‘Newsbeat’. However they could benefit from our ideas.
  • 12. Focussing mainly on a student audience looking at people between the ages of 13 and 25. Main focus age 17
  • 13. How did you attract and address?
  • 14. Certain decisions we made were made to appeal to the audience:
  • 16. As a structure we have an intro then news, then music news, then celeb news, then sport, then finishing with an outro. We used the traditional method of having hard news at the top of the bulletin and the content to generally get softer from there on. Also, we had relevant stories to our target audience, for example driving lessons info. We also threw a couple of peculiar stories in there for the audience to ponder.
  • 18. We used any indents of music to our advantage making it catchy and hopefully liked by our audience. We felt the up-beat rhythm is the taste of our audience of today stereotyping their preferences.
  • 20. We used language that was fairly informal and colloquial so our audience can relate to it. However, on the more serious stories we decided to mould the language to the same level of seriousness. In our script we placed a conversation the anchor has with a reporter in the studio to make it more relaxed and to bring our audience back to the reality that we are just like them.
  • 22. What stood out to me was the importance of levels. I didn’t understand how crucial they were and how fragile for that matter. We had to adjust our production a lot because of this.
  • 23. I also found the software me used in producing the bulletin (Audition) very helpful and efficient.
  • 24. The main thing though was seeing how it all slotted together in the end and how important it was for all the vox-pops, interviews and sound bites we used.
  • 25. At the start of the course I thought it would have been an easier task but also longer. We seemed to use time efficiently however hard we found the production.
  • 27. In my preliminary task I guess I was naive and a stranger to production. I had a vague idea of what was needed to happen in that environment as I’ve always been interested in it but there’s so much I didn’t know
  • 28. I have learnt how important it is to work as a team and how crucial the whole process is. There isn’t one part of it that shouldn’t be fulfilled as this will affect the production as a unit I now take more notes and analyse things further along with approaching things will a full working attitude
  • 31. We had a great sense of satisfaction at the end along with complete relief that we had finished it.
  • 32. We thought it sounded really good once all together and so did the majority of our feedback:
  • 33. In our feedback we found that it was mostly positive:
  • 36. “Good anchor and reporters”
  • 37. “Well written and spoken”
  • 40. There was minimal negative feedback. We recognised this and agreed with the fact that our anchor and news reporter spoke a bit too fast at times so our audience could not hear some details
  • 41. Other than that, we achieved what we set out to do!!!