Download to read offline
Uploaded byPine Tree ISD
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
The document provides data on student achievement, attendance, enrollment, finances, and human resources for PTISD school district. It includes STAAR test results, ACT/SAT scores, attendance rates, enrollment numbers, budgets, tax rates, and staffing information. Overall, the data shows the district maintaining high achievement levels, attendance, and financial stability over recent years.
![Accountability plan revised2[1]](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/accountabilityplanrevised21-120610100848-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
![Tspra presentation 2012[1]](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/tsprapresentation20121-120215072758-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
- 2. PTISD District Report StudentAchievement Attendance and Enrollment Finance Community Connections Human Resources
- 3. State of Texas– Prior Accountability System
- 4. State of Texas– New Performance Framework
- 5. State of Texas– New Performance Framework
- 6. State of TexasAssessment of Academic Readiness (STAAR) Reading Math Writing Science Social Studies Equal Above Grade 3 Equal Slightly Equal Grade 4 Below Equal Above Above Grade 5 Slightly Equal Grade 6 Below Above Above Above Grade 7 Above Above Above Above Grade 8
- 7. STAAR End ofCourse Exams # of Level II: Level III: TAKS Met Level I: Students Minimum Satisfactory Recommended Standard Tested Reading I 307 240 78% 221 72% 31 10% 292 95% Writing I 307 212 69% 175 57% 6 2% NA NA Algebra I – 100 Grade 8 64 64 100% 64 100% 28 44% 64 % Algebra I 226 203 90% 187 83% 10 4% 212 94% Geometry 72 72 100% 72 100% 27 38% NA NA Algebra II 3 3 100% 3 100% 2 67% NA NA
- 8. STAAR End ofCourse Exams # of Level I: Level II: Level III: TAKS Students Minimum Satisfactory Recommended Met Tested Standard Biology 282 273 97% 261 93% 23 8% NA Physics (Field Test) 190 167 88% 153 81% 19 100% NA World Geography 304 271 89% 246 81% 42 14% NA World History 1 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% NA
- 9. Composite ACT Scores Historical Data 22.5 22 21.5 21 PTHS 20.5 STATE 20 19.5 2010 2011 2012
- 10. Percentage of Students Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks 22.5 22 21.5 2010 21 20.5 2011 20 19.5 2012 English Math Reading Science
- 11. 2012 SAT IndividualTest Section Scores
- 12. AP Testing Historyfor PTISD 500 400 2010 300 2011 200 100 2012 0 Students Number of Number of Tes ng Tests Taken 3-5 Scores
- 13. PSAT Mean ScoresFor PTHS 2010-2011 2011-2012 Grade Level 11th 11th Critical Reading 56.8 50.7 Math 59 54.8 Writing Skills 54.7 49.7 Test Takers 35 43 Percent College 77.1 51.2 Ready
- 14. PSAT Mean ScoresFor PTHS 2010-2011 2011-2012 Grade Level 10th 10th Critical 41.1 41.8 Reading Math 43.5 42 Writing Skills 39.7 39.8 Test Takers 263 264
- 15. PSAT Mean ScoresFor PTHS 2010-2011 Grade 10 44 43 42 41 40 PTHS 39 State 38 37 36 Critical Reading Math Writing Skills
- 16. PSAT Mean ScoresFor PTHS 2011-2012 Grade 10 42 41.5 41 PTHS 40.5 40 State 39.5 39 38.5 38 Critical Reading Math Writing Skills
- 17. PSAT Mean ScoresFor PTHS 2010-2011 Grade 11 2011-2012 Grade 11 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 PTHS 20 10 PTHS State 10 0 State 0
- 18. Beginning of theYear Reading Data: Percent of Students On or Above Grade Level September 7, 2012 100 90% EOY From 2011-2012 74% 80 63% 61% BOY 2012-2013 60% 63% 60 55% Change Over Summer 45% 40 20 -16% -2% +5% 0 -18% First Grade Second -20 Third Grade Fourth Grade Grade
- 19. PTISD Dashboard Stats and Trends Financial Information Attendance Community and Connected Enrollment Student Pine Tree Achievement ISD Human Resources Dashboard
- 20. PTISD Attendance History 95.6 95.3 95.46 95.4 95.25 95.2 95.09 95 94.8 94.7 94.6 94.53 94.4 94.2 94 93.8 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
- 21. PTISD Enrollment 4800 4746 4740 4750 4724 4700 4661 4650 4634 4642 4600 4577 4550 4500 4450 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
- 22. District Finance – BudgetedExpense by Function
- 23. District Finance -Budget
- 24. PTISD Tax Rate 1.7 1.69 1.64 1.64 1.63 1.63 1.63 1.61 1.6 1.51 1.51 1.5 1.4 1.37 1.37 1.34 1.34 1.3 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 20082009 2010 2011 2012
- 25. FIRST Report Financial IntegrityRating System of Texas 2007 – Superior Rating 2008 – Superior Rating 2009 - Superior Rating 2010 – Superior Rating 2011 – Superior Rating 2012 – Superior Rating
- 26. Community Connected Business Partnerships Texas Bank& Trust Financial Literacy Classes about savings provided to all third grade students
- 27. Community Connected Business Partnership Good Shepherd Internship Program
- 28. Community Connected EducationSummit 2012 LEDCO: Longview Economic Development Corporation
- 29. Community Connected WestlakeChemical Technology / Mentorship LeTourneau University College-Ready Staffing Community Connections- Clothes Closet City of Longview Community ReNew Project with GO WEST
- 30. Community Connected Community U Volunteer Hours Website hits
- 31. Community Connected: Web Page - ptisd.org Sept. 1 –Sept. 30 2012 2011
- 32. Community Connected: Sept. 1 – Sept. 31 2011 2012
- 33. Human Resources Districtby Staff Roles Educational aides are employees who provide direct instructional support to students in the Professional staff includes classroom under the general teachers who provide supervision of a certified teacher direct instruction to and are often referred to as students in the paraprofessional staff. classroom, professional Auxiliary staff refers to all other support employees of the district. staff(nurses, counselors, di agnosticians, LSSP, speech therapists, etc.), campus administration and central administrators.
- 34. Human Resources District by Staff Roles Series 1 700 646 600 500 400 392 300 194 Series 1 200 100 60 0 Total Staff Professional Educational Auxiliary Staff Staff Aides
- 35. Teacher Information 70 63 60 50 40 30 20 17 14.2 10 8.64 0 Number of Number of Zero Average Average Teachers new - Based Teachers Experience - Experience in 2012 -2013 2012-2013 Teachers PTISD - Teacher
Editor's Notes
- #19 The data collection at the BOY was done by an internal independent team that administered the Running Record assessment for 1st thru 4th grade. The regression over the summer at Primary is expected, but does allow us to see that possible summer intervention opportunities are needed. For our Elementary campus last year, we emphasized the triangle of accuracy/FLUENCY/and comprehension for solid reading. That is evident in the minimal regression over the summer from the students of that campus. Our second and third grade teachers started the year with students that were solid at the level they left the previous year. Last year was the first year for the Intermediate campus to administer running records. It is evident in the regression over summer in fourth grade, that fluency was not considered when finding an independent level for that student. First Grade Running Record DataEND OF KINDERGARTEN % of Students at or Above Average: 90.31%BEGINNING OF YEAR FIRST GRADE % of Students at or Above Average: 74%Difference over summer: Decrease 16% Second Grade Running Record DataEND OF FIRST GRADE % of Students at or above level: 63%BEGINNING OF YEAR SECOND GRADE % of Students at or above level: 61%Difference over summer: Decrease 2% Third Grade Running Record DataEND OF SECOND GRADE % of Students at or Above Average: 55% BEGINNING OF YEAR THIRD GRADE % of Students at or above level: 60%Difference over summer: Increase 5% Fourth Grade Running Record DataEND OF THIRD GRADE % of Students at or Above Average: 63%BEGINNING OF YEAR FOURTH GRADE % of Students at or above level: 45%Difference over summer: Decrease 18%