PPT with overall coverage of the project evaluation and all the topic of project evaluation and post project evaluation are covered in this ppt.It includes all the topic of project evaluation:-
=>which of the project should be evaluated?
=>cost&timing
=>social analysis
=>environmental analysis
=>progress report
=>final report
and many more topics are covered in this ppt for the brief description of project evaluation and some left out topics are numerical of project evaluation.
3. Project evaluation refers to the systematic investigation of an object's worth or
merit. The methodology is applied in projects, programs and policies.
11. All capital projects, including fixed capital
expenditure, plant and equipment, and capital grants
and subsidies, should be subject to evaluation,
commensurate with the level of investment, to
provide the necessary information to decision-
makers.
14. Major purpose of project evaluation is to
improve value for money, the cost of project
evaluation must be balanced against the benefits
of improved decision making.
Key clients and stakeholders (e.g. departmental
management, Treasury) should be consulted on a
periodic basis to ensure the evaluations are
relevant to client needs and to avoid unnecessary
costs and delays.
15.
16. Project evaluations for major capital
projects, to be funded from a department’s
capital base and to commence in the next
financial year, should be completed by the
start of the annual Budget process. The
evaluations should be completed
sufficiently in advance of the Budget
process to allow the necessary time for
review. This applies especially where there
are contentious issues.
18. An analysis of the social impacts of a
capital project provides information,
such as distributional effects, which
are not included in an economic
analysis but may be needed for
decision-makers in assessing the
desirability of projects.
19.
20. ● result in significant distributional shifts in costs and
benefits between and within communities;
substantially affect employment, trade, private sector
or other levels of government etc;
cause disproportionate disadvantage to a particular
sector;
provoke appreciable community concern;
require changes in government policy and direction.
22. The environmental analysis may
include a preliminary review to
determine the extent and nature of the
environmental issues and whether
further investigation is needed,
followed by a detailed environmental
impact statement commensurate with
the significance of the environmental
issues and the project.
30. ❏What is the problem i am trying to
solve?
What is needed for change to
happen?
What do i plan to make change
happen?
What results i expect my project to
reach?
How can i evaluate the progress?
47. FACILITATOR
Make the required arrangements for the
meeting
Orients the participants about their duties
Reviews any material submitted before
the meeting
Establishes the guidelines for judgement
48. Help members of the group to
maintain effective working relationship
Jot down points of the entire session
Distributes project report to the team
members and to those who are
50. Gather data
# Project results
# Schedule performance
# Resource expenditures
# Problems that arose during the project
# Changes during the project in objectives, schedules, and
budgets
# Unanticipated occurrences or changes in the environment
during the project
# Customers’ satisfaction with the project results
# Management’s satisfaction with the project results
51. ISSUES TO ADDRESS
# Did you accomplish all the project objectives?
# Did you meet the project schedule?
# Did you complete the project within budget?
# With regard to problems during the project
* Could you have anticipated and planned for them in advance? If
so, how?
* Did you handle them effectively and efficiently when they arose?
# Did you use the organization’s project-management
systems and procedures effectively?
53. # Invite the right people
# Declare at the beginning of the meeting that
it’s supposed to be a learning experience rather
than a finger-pointing session
# Encourage people to –
* Identify what other people did well
*Examine their own performance and see how they
could’ve handled situations differently
55. Identify items that were effectively done
Identify the areas to be improved
Identify items that were broken : which
requires rethinking and complete repair
Decide action plans : according to the
feedbacks
Maximum participation
56. Private meetings prior the
meeting ,to ensure proper follow up of
certain ground rules
VOTING : provides complete review
and maximum participation
Praisals on excellent parts
Jot down every single detail
Submit the report to senior