1) Project monitoring is an integral part of project management that provides information to identify implementation problems and assess progress towards objectives. It determines relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability.
2) Monitoring collects and analyzes information regularly to track implementation and measure performance against expected results. It is a management tool that provides information to support decision making and adaptive management.
3) Participatory evaluation seeks to actively engage stakeholders in reflecting on and assessing project progress, achievement of results, and taking joint action from evaluation findings. It assesses efficiency, effectiveness, relevance, sustainability, and impact.
A simple presentation about Monitoring and Evaluation prepared by Jubair Ahmad Musazay for interns from Kabul University who are undergoing their internship program in General Directorate of Policy, Monitoring and Evaluation of Afghanistan National Development Strategy (ANDS), in Ministry of Economy of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.
Uploaded in Slideshare for the purpose of sharing and spreading knowledge.
6 M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation of Aid ProjectsTony
A series of course modules on project cycle, planning and the logical framework, aimed at team leaders of international NGOs in developing countries.
This is part 6 of 11, beginning with 2 modules on leadership and conflict resolution, then 9 modules on project cycle management.
This module has 3 handouts and presenter notes as separate documents.
Sample Proposal: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-watsan-training-sample-proposal-09
Slides as a handout: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-me-handout
Presenter notes: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-module-6-presenter-notes
Monitoring and evaluation is a vital component that determines the effectiveness of a corporation's assistance by establishing clear links between past, present and future initiatives and results. The process helps in improving the programme performance and achieving desired results. It provides opportunities for fine-tuning, re-orientation and planning of the programme effectively, without which it becomes impossible to measure the success and impact of the programme even if the approach is right.
A simple presentation about Monitoring and Evaluation prepared by Jubair Ahmad Musazay for interns from Kabul University who are undergoing their internship program in General Directorate of Policy, Monitoring and Evaluation of Afghanistan National Development Strategy (ANDS), in Ministry of Economy of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.
Uploaded in Slideshare for the purpose of sharing and spreading knowledge.
6 M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation of Aid ProjectsTony
A series of course modules on project cycle, planning and the logical framework, aimed at team leaders of international NGOs in developing countries.
This is part 6 of 11, beginning with 2 modules on leadership and conflict resolution, then 9 modules on project cycle management.
This module has 3 handouts and presenter notes as separate documents.
Sample Proposal: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-watsan-training-sample-proposal-09
Slides as a handout: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-me-handout
Presenter notes: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-module-6-presenter-notes
Monitoring and evaluation is a vital component that determines the effectiveness of a corporation's assistance by establishing clear links between past, present and future initiatives and results. The process helps in improving the programme performance and achieving desired results. It provides opportunities for fine-tuning, re-orientation and planning of the programme effectively, without which it becomes impossible to measure the success and impact of the programme even if the approach is right.
During this session we will:
*Review importance of monitoring and evaluation
*Share overview of grant model evaluation plan
*Review methodologies used in previous evaluations
*Share plans for future evaluation methodologies
Successful organizations are constantly monitoring, evaluating, and improving based off of their successes and failures. Learn how to design your own monitoring and evaluation program with this deck from WAN, and learn more on our free Strategic Advocacy Course, available at: http://worldanimal.net/our-programs/strategic-advocacy-course-new/about
Monitoring is the continuous collection of data and information on specified indicators to assess the implementation of a development intervention in relation to activity schedules and expenditure of allocated funds, and progress and achievements in relation to its intended outcome.
Evaluation is the periodic assessment of the design implementation, outcome, and impact of a development intervention. It should assess the relevance and achievement of the intended outcome, and implementation performance in terms of effectiveness and efficiency, and the nature, distribution, and sustainability of impact.
During this session we will:
*Review importance of monitoring and evaluation
*Share overview of grant model evaluation plan
*Review methodologies used in previous evaluations
*Share plans for future evaluation methodologies
Successful organizations are constantly monitoring, evaluating, and improving based off of their successes and failures. Learn how to design your own monitoring and evaluation program with this deck from WAN, and learn more on our free Strategic Advocacy Course, available at: http://worldanimal.net/our-programs/strategic-advocacy-course-new/about
Monitoring is the continuous collection of data and information on specified indicators to assess the implementation of a development intervention in relation to activity schedules and expenditure of allocated funds, and progress and achievements in relation to its intended outcome.
Evaluation is the periodic assessment of the design implementation, outcome, and impact of a development intervention. It should assess the relevance and achievement of the intended outcome, and implementation performance in terms of effectiveness and efficiency, and the nature, distribution, and sustainability of impact.
A Good Program Can Improve Educational Outcomes.pdfnoblex1
We hope this guide helps practitioners and others strengthen programs designed to increase academic achievement, ultimately broadening access to higher education for youth and adults.
We believe that evaluation is a critical part of program design and is necessary for ongoing program improvement. Evaluation requires collecting reliable, current and compelling information to empower stakeholders to make better decisions about programs and organizational practices that directly affect students. A good evaluation is an effective way of gathering information that strengthens programs, identifies problems, and assesses the extent of change over time. A sound evaluation that prompts program improvement is also a positive sign to funders and other stakeholders, and can help to sustain their commitment to your program.
Theories of change are conceptual maps that show how and why program activities will achieve short-term, interim, and long-term outcomes. The underlying assumptions that promote, support, and sustain a program often seem self-evident to program planners. Consequently, they spend too little time clarifying those assumptions for implementers and participants. Explicit theories of change provoke continuous reflection and shared ownership of the work to be accomplished. Even the most experienced program planners sometimes make the mistake of thinking an innovative design will accomplish goals without checking the linkages among assumptions and plans.
Developing a theory of change is a team effort. The collective knowledge and experience of program staff, stakeholders, and participants contribute to formulating a clear, precise statement about how and why a program will work. Using a theory-based approach, program collaborators state what they are doing and why by working backwards from the outcomes they seek to the interventions they plan, and forward from interventions to desired outcomes. When defining a theory of change, program planners usually begin by deciding expected outcomes, aligning outcomes with goals, deciding on the best indicators to evaluate progress toward desired outcomes, and developing specific measures for evaluating results. The end product is a statement of the expected change that specifies how implementation, resources, and evaluation translate into desired outcomes.
Continuously evaluating a theory of change encourages program planners to keep an eye on their goals. Statements about how and why a program will work must be established using the knowledge of program staff, stakeholders, and participants. This statement represents the theory underlying the program plan and shows planners how resources and activities translate to desired improvements and outcomes. It also becomes a framework for program implementation and evaluation.
Source: https://ebookscheaper.com/2022/04/06/a-good-program-can-improve-educational-outcomes/
This presentation has a vivid description of the basics of doing a program evaluation, with detailed explanation of the " Log Frame work " ( LFA) with practical example from the CLICS project. This presentation also includes the CDC framework for evaluation of program.
N.B: Kindly open the ppt in slide share mode to fully use all the animations wheresoever made.
1
4
Milestone 4
Student’s Name
University Affiliation
Southern New Hampshire University
Milestone 4
Description of the Initiative Evaluation Plan
Initiative evaluation involves systematic mechanisms for gathering, reviewing, and utilizing information to answer questions concerning the initiative, policies, and programs, specifically about their effectiveness and efficiency. Initiative evaluation can entail both qualitative as well as qualitative techniques of social research. The initiative evaluation plan also contains the intended use of the evaluation outcomes for the program enhancement and decision making. The evaluation plan serves to clarify the initiative’s purpose and expected results (Dudley, 2020). The evaluation plan provides the direction that the monitoring should take based on the initiative priorities, the available resources, time, and skills required to complete the evaluation.
The initiative will have a well-documented plan to foster transparency as well as ensure that stakeholders are on a similar page with concerns about the purpose, use, and also the beneficiaries of the evaluation outcomes. Utilization of the evaluation outcomes is not a thing that can be wished when implementing an initiative. Instead, it must be planned, directed, and ensured to have intentions (Dudley, 2020). The evaluation plan for this initiative will have many benefits, including facilitating the capacity to establish strong connections with partners and stakeholders. The program is also essential for creating the initiative transparency to the stakeholders and decision-makers. The plan also serves as advocacy means for evaluation resources based on negotiated priorities. The procedure for evaluation initiative is also critical for helping in identifying whether there are enough intervention resources and time to realize the desired evaluation exercises and provide answers to prioritize evaluation questions.
When developing the plan for evaluating the initiative targeting to promote health and wellbeing in the community, the key steps must be to develop an effective strategy. The key steps to be followed when creating the evaluation plan differ depending on the project type to be evaluated. The first step entails engaging the stakeholders. When finding the purpose of the evaluation procedures, it is crucial to determine its purpose and the stakeholders involved in the implementation process of the intervention. Identifying the purpose of the evaluation process and stakeholders involved is critical because the two components serve as the basis for evaluation planning, target, design, and comprehension of the outcomes. Stakeholders' engagement is necessary to enable the support of the evaluation process. Involving stakeholders in the evaluation process can have many advantages. Stakeholders comprise the people who use the evaluation outcomes, support and keep the initiative or those impacted by the intervention activities or evalu ...
1
4
Milestone 4
Student’s Name
University Affiliation
Southern New Hampshire University
Milestone 4
Description of the Initiative Evaluation Plan
Initiative evaluation involves systematic mechanisms for gathering, reviewing, and utilizing information to answer questions concerning the initiative, policies, and programs, specifically about their effectiveness and efficiency. Initiative evaluation can entail both qualitative as well as qualitative techniques of social research. The initiative evaluation plan also contains the intended use of the evaluation outcomes for the program enhancement and decision making. The evaluation plan serves to clarify the initiative’s purpose and expected results (Dudley, 2020). The evaluation plan provides the direction that the monitoring should take based on the initiative priorities, the available resources, time, and skills required to complete the evaluation.
The initiative will have a well-documented plan to foster transparency as well as ensure that stakeholders are on a similar page with concerns about the purpose, use, and also the beneficiaries of the evaluation outcomes. Utilization of the evaluation outcomes is not a thing that can be wished when implementing an initiative. Instead, it must be planned, directed, and ensured to have intentions (Dudley, 2020). The evaluation plan for this initiative will have many benefits, including facilitating the capacity to establish strong connections with partners and stakeholders. The program is also essential for creating the initiative transparency to the stakeholders and decision-makers. The plan also serves as advocacy means for evaluation resources based on negotiated priorities. The procedure for evaluation initiative is also critical for helping in identifying whether there are enough intervention resources and time to realize the desired evaluation exercises and provide answers to prioritize evaluation questions.
When developing the plan for evaluating the initiative targeting to promote health and wellbeing in the community, the key steps must be to develop an effective strategy. The key steps to be followed when creating the evaluation plan differ depending on the project type to be evaluated. The first step entails engaging the stakeholders. When finding the purpose of the evaluation procedures, it is crucial to determine its purpose and the stakeholders involved in the implementation process of the intervention. Identifying the purpose of the evaluation process and stakeholders involved is critical because the two components serve as the basis for evaluation planning, target, design, and comprehension of the outcomes. Stakeholders' engagement is necessary to enable the support of the evaluation process. Involving stakeholders in the evaluation process can have many advantages. Stakeholders comprise the people who use the evaluation outcomes, support and keep the initiative or those impacted by the intervention activities or evalu ...
How to write an development project evaluation report. Format and principle guidelines for mid-term and for completed projects. This format can be used for any kind of development project.
Monitoring and evaluation.
A presentation in Arabic/English prepared the Palestinian Center for Peace and Democracy (PCPD)
اعداد المركز الفلسطيني للسلام والديمقراطية
فلسطين , ديمقراطية , ديموقراطية , monitoring , elections, evaluation , politics
Similar to Program Rationale and Logic for Post Monitoring (20)
1. POST MONITORING TAMPLET
Program Rationale and logic for Post Monitoring
This aspect of evaluation is often taken for granted by people running programs because they
assume that outsiders would have this knowledge. In fact it is a crucial aspect of building the
evidence base for effectiveness. Explain why you have chosen to tackle the issue in the way you
have.Describe the overall goal of the programi.e.whatyouare trying to achieve and why you think
your approachwill work. Draw on literature, previous experience and practice knowledge. Project
managementhas the taskof establishingsufficient controls over a project to ensure that it stays on
track towardsthe achievement of itssetobjectives. Project monitoring is an integral part of day-to-
day management. It provides information by which management can identify and solve
implementation problems, and assess progress within the project. The aim is to determine the
relevance and fulfilment of objectives, developmental efficiency, effectiveness, impact and
sustainability. An evaluation should provide information that is credible and useful, enabling the
incorporation of lessons learned into the decision-making process of both recipients and donors.
Description of the initiative/program
A full descriptionof the initiativeallows someone who was not involved to get a good idea of what
was done. Including the following:
• The issue and how it was addressed
• Overall goal and specific objectives of the initiative
• Who the initiative was aimed at?
• What services and activities took place?
• Who was involved in providing the services/activities?
• Involvement of other organisations and sectors
• Ways in which community people were involved
• Costs of the program (staff time in planning and implementation, other costs).
• If and how the initiative planned to tackle equity of access to services
Monitoring
Monitoring is the regular collection and analysis of information to track the implementation and
measure the performance of a project against its expected results.
Why monitor?
A project represents a set of promises that are made to stakeholders about what will be achieved
witha setof resourcesina giventimeframe.Monitoringprovidescrucial informationabout how the
project is performing, which helps decision makers and other stakeholders track how well the
'promises'are beingkept. Monitoringisapowerful management tool. It provides project managers
2. withinformationtotrackimplementation,sothattheycan identifywhateverobstaclesare impeding
the project's success as early as possible. It is a source of information for justifying changes in
managementstrategy, budgets, etc., otherwise known as adaptive management. When it is used
well,monitoringalsohelps to identify promising interventions early on which could be replicated.
Monitoring is also a tool for motivating the stakeholders, by generating a shared understanding of
the projectand itscontexts.The informationthatitprovidescanpromote accountability, credibility
and public confidence in the project. In this instance implementation is seen as a continuous
learning process where experience gathered is analysed and fed back into planning and updated
implementation approaches.
What is participatory evaluation?
Participatory evaluation seeks to engage key project stakeholders more actively in reflecting ans
assessingthe progressof theirprojectandin particular the achievement of results as well as taking
joint action out of evaluation findings. Any evaluation seeks to assess issues of effectiveness,
efficiency,impact,relevance andsustainabilityof the developmentintervention. These five aspects
are at timesreferredtoasevaluationcriteria. The table below is gives specific questions which the
five monitoring aspects seek to answer.
Table 1: Specific Issues covered by Evaluations
Evaluation Aspect What are we going to do?
1. Efficiency - To what degree did the outputs (services and products) result
from efficient use of financial, human and material resources?
- How do outputs compare with outputs? How best were
activitiesundertakenandcouldithave been done better, more
cheaply and more quickly?
2. Effectiveness - To what extenthave objectivesbeen achieved? Were activities
sufficient to achieve agreed objectives?
3. Relevance - Were the implemented activities in line with organisational
mandate or purpose of existence?
- Were the activitiesin line with primary stakeholders’ priorities
and needs?
- Should the project be changed, continued or terminated?
4. Sustainability - What are the chances that benefits/activities will continue, if
the project/ programme stopped supporting certain
interventions?
- Are beneficiariesable toaccessservicesontheirowninabsence
of the organisation or intervention?
- To what extentare resultantchangesamongdutybearers going
to last?
- How financiallysustainableis the organisation or intervention?
- Can the intervention be replicated elsewhere?
5. Impact - What have been the intended and unintended positive and
negative aspects of implementing intervention?
3. Evaluation differs from monitoring in three respects:
Timing, Focus and Level of Detail
Monitoring and evaluations are interactive and mutually supportive processes. Monitoring and
evaluation of development activities therefore provides government officials, development
managers,andcivil societywithbettermeansfor learning from past experience, improving service
delivery, planning and allocating resources, and demonstrating results as part of accountability to
key stakeholders.
In orderto fullyunderstandthe role of monitoringindevelopmentprojects,some revisionof project
planning and management is necessary.