SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 105
In The UnitedStates District Court
For The SouthernDistrictof Texas
HoustonDivision
Louis Charles HamiltonII
Pro Se Plaintiff
And
Co- Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al
And
Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al
Vs.
Doctor DineshChandra Khare “Chief Defendant”
“Managing Director”
“GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”
2194/48-50 Chareonkrung
BangkoholamBangkoholam
Bangkok 10120 Thailand
94/10 Phet Kasem3 Soi 2,
Vs.
“GeetaInternational” et al
94/10 Phet Kasem3 Soi 2, Co-Defendant(s)
Bang Khae Nuea,
Bang Khae,
Bangkok 10160, Thailand
Vs.
“GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al
94/10 Phet Kasem3 Soi 2, Co-Defendant(s)
Bang Khae Nuea,
Bang Khae,
Bangkok 10160, Thailand
Vs.
GEETA Group LLC
1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Co-Defendant(s)
Conroe, Texas 77304
Vs.
VipulKhare
1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Co-Defendant(s)
Conroe, Texas 77304
Vs.
RishuKhare
Plk LLC
616 Bourne Ct. Co-Defendant(s)
Danville California 94506
Vs.
Vijay Khare
616 Bourne Ct. Co-Defendant(s)
Danville California 94506
Vs.
Trillionaire Assets et al
302 N. Houston#201 Co-Defendant(s)
Humble Texas, 77338
Vs.
Trillionaire Realty et al
302 N. Houston#201 Co-Defendant(s)
Humble Texas, 77338
Vs.
Greg Miller
302 N. Houston#201 Co-Defendant(s)
Humble Texas, 77338
Ph. (832) 928-8763
Civil Complaint
Jury Demand
Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfiles
“Civil Complaint”on behalf of himself in(Person) namely Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis
Charles HamiltonII”
Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfiles on
behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of Americaet al”
And on behalf of Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas et al” Vs. Doctor DineshChandra
Khare, GeetaInternational et al, “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al,
“GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”,
GEETA Group LLC et al, Vipul Khare, Greg Miller, TrillionaireRealty et al”,
and Trillionaire Assets et al”, withinthe above Honorable U.S. District Court and
for Just Cause,
Pro Se Plaintiff hereinwill showbefore the “Honorable U.S. District
Court””Honorable Justice”Civil Cause of Actions, for
Specifically, “International RICO Racket”toDefraud“UnitedStates of
America”as a Whole”in Violationof 18 U.S.C. § 371 §371 withall (Defendant(s)
and Co-Defendant(s) committedto“Conspiracy tocommit offense or to defraud
UnitedStates”
Specifically of Title III of the. "USA Patriot Act"In connectionwitha
International (RICO) Cartel scheme of things engaging furtherance’s
Specifically, violationsof “18 USC § 1343 RICO Wire Fraud”, and
Specifically, violationsof RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) “Money
laundering”
Specifically, violationsof RICO statue “18 USC § 1341 “Mail Fraud”,
Specifically, violationsof 18 U.S. Code § 1028A
Specifically, violationsof 18 U.S. Code § 1001
Specifically, violationsof“18 USC § 1956 (A) (1)
Specifically, violationsof 18 U.S.C. 1028A - Aggravatedidentity theft
Specifically Computer Fraudand Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. §1030
Specifically, violationsof DeceptiveTrade Practices Acts, Brought in
conjunction with“Common law” Fraud, and “Breachof ConstructionContract”
committedagainst namely Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” herein
Specifically “Obstructionof Justice”, “Medical Battery”, Battery,
“Harassment”, “Public Nuisance”, “Civil Conspirer”, “Intent Gross Negligence”,
“Slander”, “Breachof Fiduciary Duty”,
“False Promise of Future Performance, Detrimental reliance’s”and
“Intentional inflictionof emotional distress
Committedby all describedDefendant(s) andCo-Defendant(s) above
collectively hereinagainst the ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII, herein
his (Person) and against his “Civil Rights”, “Will”, “Peace”and “Dignity”and
committedagainst Co- Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-
Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al
Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” will showthe
“Honorable Justice as follows:
I.
Parties.
Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles HamiltonII, and AfricanAmericanMale, U.S.
Navy Veteran, Permanently Disable Veteranprotectedunder: (ADA) American
withDisability Act;
And alsominorities persons cover under TitleVII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964; Domiciliary State of Texas, P.O. Box 17524 Sugar Land, Texas 77496
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, “Managing Director of
(Geeta) International CoLtd.
Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational”et al and GeetaInternational”Legal
Division” et al, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”
Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC. AndCo-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare
Business is listedas 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Conroe, Texas 77304
“Geeta”and “International Businessgroupbasedin“Thailand” and
Focusedon the retail and consumer packagedgoods segment covering
“Thailand” “UnitedStates”and “India”,
Co-Defendant(s) Greg Miller of Trillionaire Realty et al and Trillionaire Assets et
al of Humble Texas, 77338
II.
JurisdictionandVenue
This Honorable Court Has Subject Matter Jurisdictionover the Pro
Plaintiff Claims brought under Specifically, “International RICO Racket”to
Defraud“UnitedStates of America”as a
Whole” inViolationof 18 U.S.C. § 371 §371 withall Defendant(s) andCo-
Defendant(s) committedto“Conspiracy tocommit offense or to defraudUnited
States” inconnectionwith violations
Specifically of Title III of the. "USA Patriot Act" Inconnectionwitha
International (RICO) Cartel scheme of things engaging furtherance’s
Specifically, violationsof “18 USC § 1343 RICO Wire Fraud”, and
Specifically, violationsof RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) “Money
laundering”
Specifically, violationsof RICO statue “18 USC § 1341 “Mail Fraud”,
Specifically, violationsof 18 U.S. Code § 1028A
Specifically, violationsof 18 U.S. Code § 1001
Specifically, violationsof“18 USC § 1956 (A) (1)
Specifically, violationsof 18 U.S.C. 1028A - Aggravatedidentity theft
“18 USC § 1343 RICO Wire Fraud”,
This Honorable UnitedStates District Federal Court of the UnitedStates of
AmericaHas Subject Matter Jurisdictionover the Chief Defendant “Doctor
DineshChandra Khare” inthat a “International Diversity of Jurisdiction”exist
BetweenProSe Plaintiff
“Louis Charles HamiltonII” herein amount in controversy exceed
$75,000.00 U.S. Dollars andChief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”,
“Managing Director of (Geeta) International CoLtd., Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta
International”et al and GeetaInternational”Legal Division” et al, Co-
Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC.,
And Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare are foreignNationals from “Thailand”.
Co-Defendant(s) Greg Miller of Trillionaire Realty et al and Trillionaire
Assets et al of Humble Texas, 77338 having (American) citizenship established
status withinthe State of Texas.
(1)
Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” “State, Declare andAffirm,
before the “Honorable UnitedStates Justice”onbehalf of his (Person)
And on Behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-
Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al further “State, Declare andAffirm, Before The
“Honorable UnitedStates Justice”
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta
International”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al,
Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, and Co-
Defendant Vipul Khare collectively herein
(2)
Having formulateda “International RICO Enterprise Racket”engaging in
among other things “Mutable Counts”of interstate“Mail andWire Fraud”, and
“International Mail andWire Fraud” scheme of things tooperate collectively as
a “Enterprise Racket”withinthe Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStatesof America”and Co-
Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”Jurisdiction,
To include but not limitedtoupon further informationprovidedherein
and belief such“International RICO EnterpriseRacket”describedfully herein
having already beeninstitutedandfully commenced inthe “State of California,
“State of Florida” and the “State of NewYork” and the State of Texas ,
Further ProSe Plaintiff respectfully Assert, declareandconfirmbefore the
Honorable U.S. Justice inthat the Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra
Khare”, hereinhaving “Legal Property Holdings andBanking accounts within
both “State of Californiaand the “State of NewYork” describedas follows:
A. Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” Californiadriver
records maintainan address as listed616 Bourne Ct Danville CA 94506
withCell-Ph. (936) 900-7650
B. Further Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, herein
maintain an address as listed156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534
C. As Identifiedona Fraud (RICO) Check Scheme of things to advance said
Fraud against the Pro Se Plaintiff hereinwiththe financial usage
institutionof the “CitiBank N.A. BR. #128 37-57 74th
streetJackson
Heights, NY 11372andsame scheme of things with“CitiBank”branch
in The San FranciscoBay Area“California
(3)
Pro Se Plaintiff further respectfully Assert, declare andconfirmbefore the
Honorable U.S. Justice Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” Co-
Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational
Legal Division”et al, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, “Geeta
International Co. Ltd.”, and Co-Defendant Vipul Khare collectively herein
formulatedsaid
“International RICO EnterpriseRacket”engaging inamong other things
“Mutable Counts”of interstate“Mail andWire Fraud”, and “International Mail
and Wire Fraud” scheme of things tooperate collectively as a“Enterprise
Racket”as well withinthe “State of California, Texas, Florida, and the “State of
New York” as all being legally describedof sucha International and Interstate
(RICO) Mail and Wire Fraud” scheme of things.
(4)
Further Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”Co-Defendant(s)
“GeetaInternational”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Legal
Division”et al, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, “GeetaInternational Co.
Ltd.”, and Co-Defendant Vipul Khare collectively hereinhaving further
formulatedsaid“International RICO EnterpriseRacket”toengaging inamong
other scheme of things:
1. Conspirer tocommit structuring andmoney laundering “18 USC § 371
2. Money laundering by concealment “18 USC § 1956 (A) (1)
3. “Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud Co-Plaintiff United
States”et al in violationof 18 U.S.C. § 371 §371
4. “Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud Co-Plaintiff “State of
Texas”et al in violationof 18 U.S.C. § 371 §371
5. Conspirer tocommit cyber Identity theft Fraudand relatedactivity in
connectionwithidentificationdocuments, authenticationfeatures,
and information in violationof 18 U.S. Code § 1028 inconnectionand
concert with(RICO) “International Wire fraud”
6. Conspirer tocommit false statements, concealment against the civil
rights peace and dignity of ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII”
in violationof 18 U.S. Code § 1001
7. Conspirer tocommit false statements, concealment against the Co-
Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”et al in violationof 18 U.S. Code §
1001
8. Conspirer tocommit false statements, concealment against the Co-
Plaintiff “State of Texas” et al in violationof 18 U.S. Code § 1001
9. Conspirer tocommit “Tax Evasion”on both Federal and State level
10.Aggravatedidentity theft(Physically) committedagainst the ProSe
Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” Identity, Social Security Number
and Signatures by means of “Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra
Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational”et al, Co-Defendant(s)
“GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al, “GeetaInternational Co.
Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, and Co-Defendant Vipul
Khare collectively hereinhaving illegally gainsuchpossessionof ProSe
Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” Identity, Social Security Number
and Signatures by means of “Interstate wire andInternational wire”,
fraud direct against ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII”in
violationof 18 U.S. Code § 1028A – in connectionwith interstate
“Wire Fraud”, and “International Wire Fraud”“International RICO
Enterprise Racket”scheme of things.
11.Conspirer tocommit Aggravatedcyber identity theftagainst other
similarly the same having “public business dealing”with GEETA Group
LLC et al, “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, Vipul Khare, and the direct
usage of all business records, involving withCo-Defendant(s) GEETA
Group LLC et al, in a “International andInterstate (RICO) Wire Fraud
Scheme of things such(records, documents andpersonal information)
forwarding to “GeetaInternational”et al, “GeetaInternational Co.
Ltd.”,and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al,
having derive first inthe possession, custody andcontrol of by Chief
Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” and Co-Defendant “Vipul
Khare”. AndCo-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al locatedat 1600
River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Conroe, Texas 77304,
12.Having (Already) conspirer toformulatedsaid“International RICO
Enterprise Racket”engaging in a well-establishedserviceof
“International Lawyers”tocommit to Conspirer tocommit Aggravated
cyber illegal transactions of ProSe Plaintiff business records, personal
information, social security number and“Signatures”toThird world
Countries namely “Thailand and India” among other “International
Community” for exploitationby way “International cyber Identity
Theft as well as “Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-
Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta
International Legal Division”et al, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et
al, and Co-Defendant Vipul Khare collectively hereinhaving legal
standing, past, present andfuture possession, custody andcontrol to
commit toConspirer tocommit Aggravatedcyber identity theft against
all similarly the same
13.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket”
engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to
facilitate illegal transactions inviolations onCo-Plaintiff “UnitedStates
of Americaand Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”Federal andState Laws.
14.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket”
engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to
facilitates illegal transactions inviolations of ProSe Plaintiff Civil Rights
as a (American) Citizenandother similarly the same
15.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket”
engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to
facilitates andregulate said(RICO) scheme of things to control over
Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”namely “InterstateCommerce”
in the NewHome Construction“Independent Contractor Labor prices
and wages and materials pricing control “scheme of things”
16. Having formulatedsaid“International RICO EnterpriseRacket”
engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to
fully eliminate, facilitates, committedto“Obstructionof Justice”to
regulate bothCo-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”andCo-
Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”Federal andState “Judicial Branch of
Government”against the ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII
hereinand other similarly the same inconnectiontofurtherance said
“International RICO EnterpriseRacket”withinthe Co-Plaintiff “United
States of America” and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas” Jurisdiction
17.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket”
engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to
fully eliminate, facilitates, andregulate bothCo-Plaintiff “United
States of Americaand Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”Federal andState
“Judicial Branch of Government”“Due Process clause”of The
AmericanConstitutionof the Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”
and fully eliminate, facilitates, andregulate “Due Process clause”of
the “State of Texas”Constitutionof the Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”
against the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinand other
similarly the same inconnectionto furtherance said“International
RICO Enterprise Racket”withinthe Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of
America”and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”Jurisdiction
18.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket”
engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to
fully eliminate, facilitates, andregulate bothCo-Plaintiff “United
States of Americaand Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”Federal andState
“Judicial Branch of Government”“Equal Protectionof the Law clause”
of The AmericanConstitutionof the Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof
America”and fully eliminate, facilitates, andregulate “Equal
Protectionof the Law clause”of the “State of Texas”Constitutionof
the Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”against the ProSe Plaintiff “Louis
Charles HamiltonII hereinand others similarly the same inconnection
to furtherance said“International RICO EnterpriseRacket”withinthe
Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”andCo-Plaintiff “State of
Texas”Jurisdiction.
19.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket”
engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to
“Exploit”Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof Americaet al” and Co-
Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas et al” lack thereof of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964;and (ADA) AmericanwithDisability Act;full
protectionof Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles HamiltonII, and African
AmericanMale, U.S. Navy Veteran, Permanently Disable Veteran
protectedunder:(ADA) AmericanwithDisability Act;andalso
minorities personscover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;
Domiciliary State of Texas, P.O. Box 17524 Sugar Land, Texas 77496 *A
“Independent ConstructionContractor whichChief Defendant “Doctor
DineshChandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al and
Co-Defendant Greg Millerof Trillionaire Realty et al”having fully
engage in suchhostile Discriminationpatternandpractices in
conjunctionwith “Medical Battery”, “Harassment”, and“Public
Nuisance”, tofurther provide advancement thereof andprotection
thereof said“International RICO Enterprise Racket”inconcert,
collusionwithall said describedDefendant(s) andCo-Defendant(s)
collectively hereinagainst ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII”
others similarly the same.
20.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket cartel”
engaging specifically inconspirer against TitleIII of the "USA Patriot
Act".
(5)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII herein“Declare”, State, and
Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” ProSe Plaintiff on his (Personal)
behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and
Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al in that
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinbeing first and
foremost “front man” on behalf of all describedCo-Defendant(s) collectively
herein
Betweenthe exact dates of June 25th
2015 andJuly 6th
7:20 pm 2015 Chief
Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” first approached(Pro Se Plaintiff)
hereinon behalf of himself and all the describedCo-Defendant(s) inparagraph
(1-4) above collectively hereinina half bake (RICO) combine “international
greedy racket enterprise” inassociationwith
Violations of “18 USC § 1343 Wire Fraud”, Interstate andInternational
“scheme of things”having accumulatedgradually past acquisitionof a simple
“Fraud and Breachof ConstructionContract”incommon law withinthe Co-
Plaintiff “State of Texas” Jurisdictioninthat “
(6)
Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfurtherance’s“Declare”,
“State”, and “Affirm”before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff
hereinon his (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “United
States of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al in that Chief
Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta
International”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al,
“GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, and Co-
Defendant Vipul Khare
After sometime their after the meeting of the “Minds”of said
“International Racket cartel”Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”
Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta
International Legal Division”et al, “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”,
Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, and Co-Defendant Vipul Khare
collectively hereinhaving further formulatedsaid
“International RICO EnterpriseRacket”toengaging andconspire inamong
other a “scheme of things”as describedinParagraph(4) 1-20 above, to
Furtherance’s exactly onor about the 12th
day of June 2015 as described
by the Co-Plaintiff (State of Texas) Secretary for the “State of Texas”createdan
empty shell company as follows:
*“GEETA GROUP LLC, FILE DATE 06/12/2015, FILING TYPE“CORPORATE”,
REGISTRATED AGENT“VIPUL KHARE” 1600 RIVER POINTEDR. APT 812, CONROE,
TEXAS 77304, MONTGOMERY COUNTY*
(7)
Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfurtherance’s“Declare”,
“State”, and “Affirm”before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff
hereinon (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of
America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al
In that on or about the same 12th
day of June 2015 GeetaGroupLLC being
a said “Empty LLC Shell corporations”operating withinthe Co-Plaintiff “State of
Texas”Jurisdictionnamely Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta Group LLC”hereinwas
formedhaving a name similar toexisting name of that Co-Defendant(s)
“GeetaGroup International et al”base at 94/10 Phet Kasem3 Soi 2, Bang
Khae Nuea, Bang Khae, Bangkok 10160, Thailandand Co-Defendant(s)
“GeetaInternational et al”(IP) International Email address being
geetaint@loxinfo.co.th;
Physically the “exact same” email address for Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaLLC”
being 1 of 5 Business listedat 1600 River PointeDr. Apt. 812, Conroe, Texas
77304
WithCo-Defendant(s) “GeetaGroup LLC”operating withinthe Jurisdiction
of the Co-Defendant(s) “State of Texas”being 1 of 5 Business listedas 1600
River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Conroe, Texas 77304 (Legal) Business address for Co-
Defendant(s) “Geeta GroupLLC”herein.
(8)
Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfurtherance’s“Declare”,
“State”, and “Affirm”before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff
hereinon (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of
America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al
That “However”Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, on July
8th
, 9th
, 12th
, 17th
, 26th
, and August 7th
and 23rd
in the year 2015 reasonably
foreseeable knewthat interstate wire communicationswouldbe used;and
“interstatewire communications”were infact used…
As describedinparagraph(9) belowto further this fraudulent
international (RICO) wire fraud“scheme of things” describedhereininaddition
to the numerous cell Phone call and (IM) instant messages”involved
notwithstanding U.S. Mail,
(9)
(July 8th
2015)
Dear Louis
Itwas nice wemet and discussed possiblebusiness. I amstudying your proposal
to constructcomplete houseof 1842 sqftof living area @$48/sqft. As discussed I
am attaching the softcopy of full plan set. This plan has not yet been submitted
to HOA and may vary slightly but basis will remain unchanged. Kindly send me
your address wherewecan meet next time when I come to south. you can
contact me at contacts given below
Regards
Dr. Khare
Disclaimer:
The study is with outa commitmentfrom either side and will become a
commitmentonly after contractis committed
(July 8th
2015)
hi you can meet me on job locations any time you call, I moving now as we are
build on 40 lots, and camping out to becauseof different job locations on the
outside of Houston area, fromLa Port- to Humble ..........I looking forward to
your project and consider renting in this location while projectbe fixed, the Lake
so nice to jet skion :) your project at $48 per sq. ft. for total of $88,416 is
good...butwilling to reduce to $46 per sq. ft on condition of starting the other
projectfoundations after another to speed up the build process for the next two
years of home construction....
and my goal is simple...to marry "MischellManeja" fromthe Philippines as I show
you her picture, I have everything I need in the United States, good skills, smart
company, and good family backing.... my goal is her being my future wife,
secured and happy so for her Love, (I) reduced my price to $46 dollars per sq. ft.
= $84,732 for thatproject and each and every one thereafter at $46 dollars
complete building project:) (Louis)
(July 8th
2015)
Thank you Louis. I appreciate your gesturein love for your Mischell. We shall let
you know. Haveyou worked with post tension foundations. Understand this is
posttension type foundation. We aretaking up with HOA & preparing paper work
Regards
Dr. Khare
GEETA Group LLC
E-mail: geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; dckhare@gmail.com
Tel: 9369007650
(July 8th
2015)
GEETA Group LLC
E-mail: geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; dckhare@gmail.com.
Tel: 9369007650
Hi Louis
Kindly find attached the draft agreement that will be required once we go ahead
of with the project. Kindly review and advisecomments, if any. Justto informyou,
design engineer could not complete the drawing work today. so could not go to
HOA.
Regards
Dr. Khare
Disclaimer:Thismail is just for reference and thereis no commitment till the
agreement is signed
(July 8th
2015)
Thanks
On Jul 8, 2015 9:21 PM, bluefinlch2@gmail.com wrote:
Yes.....ihave18 men crew ready juston foundation alone....any kind of
foundations.post.or beam.. plus.pier placements if needed....my framing crew is
16 men crew if needed....as i can build all 5 homes under 2 years...to almost18
MONTHS...completed.... thanks for ya warmwishes...and was niceLunch :-)
(July 9th
2015)
(I) already been doing commercial concrete at De Chavez Construction Co @
Bluejack National is a world-class privategolf club and community located in
historic Montgomery County near Houston. Comprised of 755 acres of rolling hills
and beautifully wooded countryside, Bluejack National provides the perfect
setting for a truly unique golf experience in the Texas market. as
seen http://houston.craigslist.org/sks/5073027272.html (Roads) to be exact :)
to include
http://houston.craigslist.org/sks/5053427519.html this account has custom
framing work on a large scale over 12,500 sq. ft. Home plus foundation all dry in
for $35.00 per sq. ft. as you see me in the
photo's http://houston.craigslist.org/sks/5045456672.html
OK my company offer to you is $46.00 dollars entireprojectincluding the same
price for all 5 homes you required built , that will secure me being free from
looking for work for a shortbit I been giving this some study,
and whatmakes wantthis is simple as I stated "Mischell", i ready for a real wife
:) :) and family again...xoxoxoxo plus all of The Lakes in the Area, and I am
consider moving to "Montgomery Texas (USA) and build my home on lake front,
as this is better then living out on 40 lot's in the middle of know where.....but
there (I) can haveplus a boat dock
as D.C.Khare...
.I am a Navy Vet actually secrete (Commander) as seen on my Google Profile
https://plus.google.com/photos/109749112725064370937/albums/59009693891
62880081
Louis Charles Hamilton a/k/a "Cmdr. Bluefin (United States Navy Seal) :) :) :)
must dash off to work, took the time to give you our Company profile.....you have
some of my construction profile and Navy Profile and my continue wishes we
doing business, I havethe entire Construction team in place, VIP and ready :)
thanks for such a sweet offer and hope we can work together (Louis) ....xoxoxoox
(I) looking forward to Retire soon with nice Future :)
(July 9th
2015)
Thank you Louis. Do you havea crew for land clearing... We have to clear land
before we can start work. You said you can organizeland clearing., though not
included in your scope. Kindly advise
(July 9th
2015)
Yes.....that.s easy...and iwas with my chief construction engineer and explain your
entire raw layout....and knowing wecan include land clearing.....justneeding to
put each location to. a price.....itnot a issue....and already havetrucks and
equipment in place.....as ya seeing in attached photo's .....ishall send ya pictures
from.my other cell as thid Tree cutting job was done in fact Montgomery
Texas.....this land clearing phase.....can bedone under me....again. :-)
(July 12th
2015)
D. C. Khare
for your request here is my information as follows:
1. for the especially the hard liners at the HOA and Insuranceneeds and Banking
needs (Please) use "Bustos Framing" , Alejandro Bustons" 27151Hilland Dale
Acres Spelndora Texas 77372 they ask for Charles if needed (832-344-7134)
Infiniti InsuranceServices 2129 FM2920 Rd. ste,. 220, Spring Texas 77388
#ARKGC42011 "ThePolicy"
2. For agreed contract between D.C. Khareet al and Me...... "Louis Hamilton"
mailing address is P.O. Box 17524 Sugar Land Texas 77496-7524 HomeAddress is
6403 Miners Bend Lane Richmond Texas 77469
but will discuss in person paymentand detail plan at later date in a agreed detail
construction contract
it is bestthat for 100% secured with the HOA in Montgomery Texas, and your
banking needs that I used the framing company , profile
so you face no reject or delays, as described aboveto include I have two different
construction "Hispanic primary crew" thathas no need to be involved in this
process to include our professional"Bustos Framing" company
record will with stand checks in the build industry becauseof the volume of high
dollar end homes built and good community standings......
as agreed I shallmaintaining and progress your entireconstruction project(s)
fromclearing the land to the foundation, framing, and entire full complete
packagefinished homes to include landscaping details within reason.... our crew
is ready, and you have the lay out of your request (Thanks) (Louis)
(July 12th
2015)
These are the latest pic from the recent Job you saw....
(July 17th
2015)
D.C. Khare, Here is pictures posting up date from the Home Project as posted
on "Craiglslist" (Louis)
http://houston.craigslist.org/sks/5126957218.html
(July 17th
2015)
Thanks Louis. I havegone California on three days holiday. Shall speak to you on
return Monday or Tuesday
Sent frommy iPhone
(July 17th
2015)
Have safetrip :-)
(July 20th
2015)
Good Morning....ihavenow work my self out of employment....Today.as my
curruentwork load ended this Sunday...which icompleted the small garage
roofing, lighting. and painting, clean up..there after already framing & concrete..in
hopes of starting as fresh off for new construction employment....this early in the
week.....wishing to hear back from you when your free...on your plans...for new
construction.....Louis.....haveno new projects...as of yet.....hoping wecan finished
your proposal...........thanks..
(July 26th
2015)
here is the Concrete ProjectYou visited Today Pictures Posted, (Online) justclick
the link....... :) Louis
http://houston.craigslist.org/sks/5095789619.html
(July 26th
2015)
Dear Louis
Waiting for details of your subcontractor for
Foundation
FrameWork
Sheathing & Sheetrock
Plumber
Electrical
Carpenter
Any other
We Would like name & contact details of these people. We would also like to
have your ID card detail & adress to put in contract.
As promised attach kindly find break up of drawdown ateach stage. Kindly advise
the changes in list if any.
(July 27th
2015)
here is my info.....Louis Charles Hamilton II is my legal name (SS #) is 467-35-
****, home address is 6403 Miners Bend Ct Richmond Texas 77469,
(Mailing address) is P.O. Box 17524 Sugar Land Texas 77496 832-894-9465 (Cell),
713,497-7924, and 832,344-7134
Alex- Framer- 281-467-6656
Ray-Concrete-713-539-8577
Melvin-Plumber-713-534-2368
Carlos -Electrical-832-707-6180
as for your proposalpaymentplan I need to look at it closer as I been studying it
with the Blueprints".. will submitmy requestchanges tonight (Louis)
thanks.............
(August 7th
2015)
Hi Louis
Kindly find attached the draft agreement that will be required once we go ahead
of with the project. Kindly review and advisecomments, if any. Justto informyou,
design engineer could not complete the drawing work today. so could not go to
HOA.
Regards
Dr. Khare
Disclaimer:Thismail is just for reference and thereis no commitment till the
agreement is signed
GEETA Group LLC
E-mail: geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; dckhare@gmail.com
Tel: 9369007650
(August 10th
2015)
D.C. Khare...thefollowing changes need to be corrected as i forward.
attachment... the first draw...is actually $1693 vs. $1000 as outline in the
contract. vs. payment plan layout you supplied herein...second the additional
$600.00 additional adjustmentyou agreed upon to cover the real diffucultcost of
hauling off on cleary this property has not been added to this
contract..$84,640,,,,which should refectactually $85,240...other wise...your
contract with the exeception as described aboved of me siging it...i am in full
agreement after said corrections.... Been made....and my sub,s contractors
looking for new blueprints..updates..asap..Thanks...in other news Doctor as i
explain me desire for such a contract is ..
.I havemy baby..MischellPassportcompleted in the philippines...it will released
September 15., as i am working for both her and our future...together....these
construction projectwill secureour plans....Thanks...Louis"
(August 23rd
2015)
GEETA Group LLC
E-mail: geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; dckhare@gmail.com
Tel: 9369007650
Mr Louis
We are not sureif you can clear the lot & cut the tree out professionally. In view
before we agree & permit you to clear the lot we would like to have at least three
references where you have cut the tree and cleared the lot. Kindly provide
references urgently to evaluate.
Regards
Dr. Khare
GEETA Group LLC
E-mail: geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; dckhare@gmail.co
Tel: 9369007650
(August 24th
2015)
Doc....whileyou concern about the trees...i havebeen with Energy...and
Foundation...plus Framing.....you need 70-75 yards of concrete....as for
electrical....you may be delay...by 1-2 months in having electrical installed.for this
backwayards designed project.
.as My Electrical having now secured a date detail today justfor the high tech
engeener from Entergy to described their plans to physically putin power on that
entire end of the lots.
...as for the trees...i not going to get into a fuss.....when your budgetof $850 for
this is not whats needed for a professional.to do the trees as you saying..plus..a
out doors toilet...plus insurances...plus...clear thelot and haul all of this away on
same $850 budget.
.when next your draw plan for foundation...cause for 70-80 yards of concreteat a
cost of $100- $120 a yard = aprox$9600 justin Concrete material alone for this
job..
.this do not countfor rebar..postwire..wooden forms...and largeLabor...crew
needed to providefull complete foundation..
,.when you have a payment plan that will not even cover the simple payment of
the concrete foundation...materials let alone the labor. ..they will not work for
free.ok...
.as for electrical...you wanted this in your duties...iagree...butyou knew...this is a
enourmus ordeal....as ispent all day. with each chief staff member
...framing..electrical...and concrete..on each of their professionaljob
locations...putting your project...to the correctcalulations needed in materials
alone
...as your plan do not even cover release of funds to effect a building of a
foundation..in a proper manner.ok.to include a dumpster as required on the Job
site justto clear the property...what...used thetrees as toilet...?
..as for the clearing of the land....call whomever....itrying to salvagea contract
designed for failure...under my name.
...which...if you did as i was saying at first..with proper budget then a dumb
$850...to effectall as described herein...heavy equipment...and man power...gas
and travel for a week..on..$859
i can have manage more personalman power...to effectall of the above..butwith
what....$850
,do not even cover a weeks labor for 1 labor...letalone heavy equipment...tree
cutting ..hauling..heavy equipment.boxblade to cutt back the soil...and bobcat to
move all of this earth and Debrys...and my fee.....whats leftfor me
on...$850....ok.iwork for free....?
,,So we all agree...you need to rethink...your building project....stop holding back
on money...as my team dont work for free...and spent..many man hours today as
a favor to me to figure whatis really wrong on Nottingham Ln. ok
...realsimple...whomever designed that pay plan lost in reality of construction in
2015 ..
we do not even have cost to cover...thepermit for electrical....while...you Doc.... i
figure assumei am Nego...i dont know no better in these construction facts...?
well i enclosed ..frommoreprofessionallarger construction job site.today..my
mexican construction team photos of today jobs.being included and ...10 xthe
sizeof your simple job...
.they will not work for free...or in any formslow or stupid...ok,,,,,,neither ami.
Doc....ok...
.whomever got this twisted ...talk with them and yourself....thetrees...and lot
clearing sub it out...i do not care
...i am tired...ready to build a home...and the man power is ready too...to work for
you today...
and i broughtboth teams lunch...getting your job layed out. and secured
Enegery tech.to get every thing offically correct instead of being blind
as your missing a lot of facts...especially...i. foundation..and electrical.and starting
budget
..Louis...iwill not proceed until advised...butwill continue collect correctdata for
my interest.hopewe dont have any formal complications...tired of legal and Court
drama
you...simply.going.off...and chocking your job...being cheap...!.
.please dont belittle me...and my professionalteamwith your ceap budget
plan..crap..and whats needed to really clear this land in once again..being
cheap...witholding operational funds until after the fact
.and dontbelittle me and my construction team abilities to get this done....we
have everything you need...but not sufficentdeposited on starting such a small
job... Louis...and takenote...they all working currenton jobs...10xyour simple
home... Da
(August 26th
2015)
We spoken last night....as i trying to explain...what is correct...for this Job...as
required....by Law....ok....and ihaveno roomfor mistakes.., and wrong handling
of the $85,000 .Projectbudget....being with held and controled by you...(Doctor)
You paid out $850. and this was design by you to clear the land. , cutting of trees.,
haul away all of this debry.. pay labor. that do not include me being paid
...when i Louis Charles Hamilton II sign a contract which also required..i
.purchase.of a porta potty on site restroom...costfor 1stmonth $164.99...store
temporary electrical power....which iput up $500. DEPOSIT...with electrican from
the original $850. to get this electrical process started...and having now a
electrical account set up at Enegery #4320314Skew #107 and buy a $200 chain
saw...leaving $150. to continue on ward fromthe date i sign said contract...on a
operational limit of $150 ,,notwithstanding gas for transportation back and forth
fromHouston Texas to Montgomery. Texas to the physicalJob site
to include the builders Rick Insurancepolicy....$720.00 for sixmonths you wanting
on this Job site....for all in the origanaldraw of a simple $850. U.S dollars.. when
all construction contractors reciving no less then 13 down on a project that
required labor and materials which you should havehanded over...a minum of
$28,300. US dollars..
.which would cover the electrical deposit of $5500. down for theelectrican and
his crew....to installtemporary power..do under ground digging.., get account set
up with Enegery...havea tech fromEnegery install a transformer...so thejob site
alone having power as required by same contract you designed....for a simple
$850
when i am paying out already $500 in deposit for electrical. from your Cheap
$850.and $50 for 1 day labor.... and buy a $200 chain saw
...leaving $100.00 U.S. dollars to cut down all the required trees and hauled away
all debry with a dumpster at a normalcost..no less than $1500. US. dollars... plus
normal costof $600.00 U.S. dollars to havea box blade scrapeback all the soild
on this lot...to be ready for grading for concrete foundation. forming which you
do even not know whatthe hell a box blade is or how it even work as the date
was set for this Sunday..
.but belittle me as in now wanting 3 refferances to clear this lot...for now your
ungodly in the United States of America $850. cheap startup budget of a
remaining. Sumof $150 U.S. dollars
..to include with the sameremain $150.00 U.S.dollarscutdown all the tress. haul
away all debrys...haveinsurance...storeelectrical power...buy porta potty..and
rental of a box blade...to include pay labors to performed the task at hand. of
building a $85,000 homeon a start up.money out line of ... a crapy cheap
$850.budget..
now the electrical calling cus he has a date with engery....and dontwork for
free....as i attached his messageto which he needs deposittoday...for $5000. as i
agreed in sign contractto even haveelectrical phasestarted with the job site and
entergy...plus pullpermits....and already gave him $500 fromyour cheap
budget....theaccount number is temporary set up in builders name which is
me....#4320314 Sku #107
as you now ready to complicate matter morewith Engery in a silly inquiry ...which
you hire me to achive this...now asking why it not in your name...atEnegery.....to
include ready to belittle me more about the Risk insurancefor the Job.site being
endorsein your name.... when in fact it is being broughtfor your simple job under
builders name which once again in me....and the costof this $720. 00 U.S.
dollars...butyou only providing $850....to startthis job....which requires... @ a
whole lot more then $850 which doinot even cover the electrical staff
wages...which you metat your property working for me... nor cover
insurances...porta potty.., boxblade...cuttting trees down...hauling away all
debrys...,my labor staff weekly wages...as wellas me tbe builder having funds in
tbis same startup cheap crap of $850
i agreed to do this home for you and because of the sizeof your project...could
not take on any other employment...which i lost...two contracts 1. for $14,800.00
and 1.$2500.00 to accomnidate you. and now broketurning down work...to build
your home...to be free to complete it in 120 as the contract required. .buti in
delays by your cheap $850 budget....treating melike somebrokestreet trash
negro..instead of a contractor....!!!which you came to my physicaljob sites to
inspect said projects...beforeyou even decided to award me this $85,000
contract...ok. thosetwo project put up 1/3 deposit on tbe entire projects...and it
was staff with over 12 men which we completed that. two jobs in under 10 days
..Yet i give up $16,200in work orders to startbuild this home and 4 other back to
back..and on a funky startup budget which was $1680 and you reduced that to
nothing but $850.00. to do all as required as stated here in
..and i can not even have a normaloperational strating fee...or havethe electrical
staff paid proper which they alread commence work on your property....and now
you ready to have ne work brokefurther....and you Doctor forcing now your very
on cheap breach of construction contract..
to include..even piss off..theteam of builders .trying to work for you...and you
dont even respect...thatmoney needing to be released fast....withoutdelay and
hassel...and your confused complications...in whats proper to startbuilding a
home....ineed this corrected to be expidted fast.
...Enegery is soon on the way and you will have my Electrical staff quitting before i
can even have power broughtby Enegery...let alone the Box blade....porta
potty...risk insurance....dumpster to clear this site...and or dump trucks...and tree
cutting.....this messagehas been forward to my Attorney...and staff at De Chavez
Construction.for records..keeping..if wehaving problems...ipaying out of my own
pocket to continue for a week. .becauseyour cheap budget of $850 is burnt
up....too kow to even startbuild a out housetoilet.. let alone...$85,000New
Home Construction project....ok...this is almost2016 gas it at $2.35- $2.25 a
gallon...pricerange....this is not a way to manage build a new home on any
level....and
..i need to meet with you asap..liketoday..and get the proper funds to do this
job..reimburstback my $500 depositfor ekectrical.withoutbeing held back...and
at a state of being poor caused by you...being selfish., and cheap...to take on the
task of building this new home under contract with me... Louis Charles Hamilton
II. Doctor...you havenoteven provided me with a copy of rhe contract and all
documents you had me signed at the contact signing day...a week ago....ok....and
you question me....?
(August 26th
2015)
Gregory Miller <greg_miller_realtor@outlook.com>
Aug
26
to me
Hi Louis,
To make surewe move as fast as possibleand payment be made on time, could
you send paymentschedules as soon as convenient? Dr Kharewants it to be
reviewed.
Also, Dr Khare was taking care of methods of payment and perhaps looking to
open up a chaseliquid card.
If need any help or have any questions let me know available anytime.
Sincerely,
Greg
Ps: sorry aboutthis, is your name louis or Lewis ?
Sent from my iPhone
(August 26th
2015)
Louis Hamilton <bluefinlch2@gmail.com>
Aug
26
to Gregory
Louis..and thanks...itbedone asap.....could notcash that check...his bank been
closed...itin New Jersey...timeZone...pks. adviseDoc heneed to clear this in
moring when i try again......also...theporta potty....need to be finished which they
have night servicefor this....ireally dont care who.namego.on a toilet
contract...ok...wejustneeds this done....asap....
(10)
Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfurtherance’s“Declare”,
“State”, and “Affirm”before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff
hereinon (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of
America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al
Not Just any “Interstate wirecommunication”via the “Internet” was
being usedon July 8th
, 9th
, 12th
, 17th
, 26th
, and August 7th
and 23rd
in the year
2015 inthat
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinwas providing
“among other things”ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII”Construction
business details, personal informationandU.S. Citizenship“Social security
number” and signature inthis International (RICO) Wire FraudScheme of Things
in direct concert, collusionwithCo-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC. Business
listedat 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Conroe, Texas 77304 via
“International Wire Services”toCo-Defendant(s) “GEETA International
Group ” Namely Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational et al”and Co-
Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al, “GeetaInternational
Co. Ltd.”, from the (IP) email address listedoneachemail sent toPro Se Plaintiff
hereinas describedinparagraph (9) belowclearly showing Co-Defendant(s)
GEETA Group LLC.
(IP) * E-mail: geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; address listedin“Thailand”while
physically Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC. Business is listedas 1600 River
Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Conroe, Texas 77304 withinthe Jurisdictionof Co-Plaintiff(s)
“State of Texas”
(12)
Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfurtherance’s“Declare”,
“State”, and “Affirm”before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff
hereinon (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of
America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al
In that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinonJuly
8th
, 9th
, 12th
, 17th
, 26th
, and August 7th
and 23rd
in the year 2015
1. Did infacts and legal terms refer tohimself as “Regards Dr. Khare” on
July 8th
, 9th
, 12th
, 17th
, 26th
, and August 7th
and 23rd
in the year 2015
2. Did infacts and legal terms refer to“We”as a group when sending all
terms and conditions of the ConstructionContract inall “International
wire communication”and “interstate wire communications” as
describedinparagraph(9) above clearly showing
3. Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC Business addresslistedas 1600
River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812,Conroe, Texas 77304as describedby the
Secretary for the “State of Texas”
4. “GEETA GROUP LLC, FILE DATE 06/12/2015, FILING TYPE
“CORPORATE”, REGISTRATED AGENT“VIPUL KHARE” 1600 RIVER
POINTEDR. APT 812, CONROE, TEXAS 77304, MONTGOMERYCOUNTY.
5. Texas Business Registrationrecord“GEETA GroupLLC” Business
address listedas 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812,Conroe, Texas 77304
as 1 of 5 Business listedas 1600 RiverPointe Dr. Apt. 812,Conroe,
Texas 77304
6. Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC locatedat 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt.
812,Conroe, Texas 77304 andCo-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational et
al” locatedat 94/10 Phet Kasem3 Soi 2, Bang Khae Nuea, Bang Khae,
Bangkok 10160, Thailandbothhaving the same “International Email
address namely geetaint@loxinfo.co.th;
(13)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII herein“Declare”, State, and
Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” ProSe Plaintiff on his (Personal)
behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and
Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al states, declare andAffirm
In that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinonthe
exact dates of February 22nd
2008 petitionfor and receivedaDMVCalifornia
Driver License #E2336392, having already inplacement asaving and checking
Banking account with“Citibank”San FranciscoBay area Branchwithhome
address (Identified) as 616 Bourne Ct. Danville California94506
(14)
Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles HamiltonII Co-Plaintiff(s) United States of
America”et al and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al herein“Declare”, State, and
Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”that on or about in the year of 1995
Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al andCo-Defendant(s) “Geeta
International “Legal Division”et al”was incorporated.
“Geeta”and “International Businessgroupbasedin“Thailand and
Focusedon the retail and consumer packagedgoods segment covering
“Thailand”, Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”and“India”.
Withcorporate matters listing as describedinparagraph(14) below
(15)
Corporate Matters
GEETA brandedWholesale DistributionandInternational Trading
2194/48-49 Bang Koh Laem,
Bangkok - 10120 Thailand
Tel: (+662) 291-1968
Fax: (+662) 688-1146
Email: contact@geetaint.com
GeetaFoods - California, USA Satellite Office
Danville, CA 94506
Tel: +1-925-282-3482
Fax: +1-682-292-2887
Email: info-feedback@geetaint.com
GeetaFoods - NewYork, USA SatelliteOffice
Jackson Heights, NY
Tel: +1-917-573-1923
Fax: +1-413-581-7495
Email: info@geetaint.com
Retail Supermarkets
Value Mart Co Ltd.
Soi 20 Central Sukhumvit
Bangkok, Thailand
Tel: (+662) 261-5955
Fax: (+662) 261-5859
Email: info@geetaint.com
Restaurants:
Soi 12, SukhumvitRoad,
Bangkok, Thailand
Tel: (+662) 653-1171
Tel: (+662) 653-1173
Fax: (+662) 663-3721
Email: info@geetaint.com
Home Delivery:
Tel: (+662) 291-1968
Email: info@geetaint.com
(16)
Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates
of America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein“Declare”, State,
and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”
In that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinht. 5ft. 5”
wt. 160 (Lbs) eyes (Black) borninthe 1940’s January 31st
as so claimedwith
DMVfor State of Californiawiththe usage of the “Title” Dr. Khare
Did inall factual circumstance andevents withinthe Co-Plaintiff(s)
“UnitedStates of America”Jurisdiction, Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh
Chandra Khare”, PurchasedLot 6621 know tobe (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA.
94506 andin 1998 built 3460 sq. ft. NewConstructionsingle family home having
4 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms which was last soldfor $1,075,000.00
(17)
Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles Hamilton II”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates
of America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein“Declare”, State,
and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”
In that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, on the exact
date of “August 22nd
2015 issuedaPersonal check toPro se Plaintiff “Louis
Charles HamiltonII” hereininthe Amount in excess of $1,350.00 U.S. Dollars
and in the present of the “Citibank” inMontgomery County Conroe Texas
Branch
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, further withdrewvia
live banking (Teller) (ATM) account withdrawal inthe amount inexcess of
$500.00 U.S. Dollars making first install payment toProSe Plaintiff for New
Constructionas agreedupon in signcontract as detail in Co-Defendant(s) Geeta
Group LLC (Agreement) withChief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”,
fully the front man.
(18)
Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates of
America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein“Declare”, State,
and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”the Check was process at PLS
Check Cashers 5823 Gulf Freeway HoustonTexas 77023viatheir “Wire Services”
on behalf of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII herein
Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, “Declare”, State, andAffirm
before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”under any circumstances would Chief
Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinallow PLS Check Cashers
5823 Gulf Freeway HoustonTexas 77023 viatheir “Wire Services”tocashsuch
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, personal check which PLS
Check Cashers first rancheck through their electronic checking devise,
Secondly “PLS Check Cashers”called “Citibank”inthe presence of the Pro
Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereintoverify Chief Defendant “Doctor
DineshChandra Khare”, hereinfully having sucha “Live”account with
“Citibank”as this was verifiedtobe true
“However” “PLS Check Cashers”needed Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh
Chandra Khare”, to verify his last (4) digits of his social security number viathe
“PLS Check Cashers”phone line in order to further proceeding incashing said
check drawn in the amount of $1, 350.00 U.S. Dollars.
(19)
Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates of
America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein“Declare”, State,
and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”the Check of Chief Defendant
“Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, that was (legally) process at PLS Check Cashers
5823 Gulf Freeway HoustonTexas 77023 viatheir “Wire Services”onbehalf of
the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII herein
a. Said Personal check of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra
Khare”, hereinissuedfrom“Citibank”was Drawn on the exact
same address of (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 toahome
which was sold on January 2006 for $1,075,000.00 but saidcheck
for “Constructionservices”was made out on August 22nd
2015..
To ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII…herein..?
b. Said check was made out from a sold resident said Chief
Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, herein“assuming”
having no (legal) control over in2015… since saidproperty
namely “Material facts”supporting that (616) Bourne Ct.
Danville CA. 94506 was soldinJanuary 2006 for $1,075,000.00
c. The exact address of (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 is listed
on Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, hereinDMV
CaliforniaDriver License #E2336392,
d. Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al andCo-Defendant(s)
GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al collectively having
placement of GeetaFoods - California, USA (Secrete) Satellite
Office located in namely “Danville, CA 94506” Tel: +1-925-282-
3482 Fax: +1-682-292-2887 Email: info feedback@geetaint.com
e. ” Tel: +1-925-282-3482 is a none working number while being
currently advertised on the internet as Co-Defendant(s) Geeta
Foods - California, USA SatelliteOffice.
f. In January 2006 for $1,075,000.00 Chief Defendant “Doctor
DineshChandra Khare”, hereinDMVCaliforniaDriver License
#E2336392 having inexcess of $1,075,000.00U.S. Dollars in
“Citibank”under account for the address of (616) Bourne Ct.
Danville CA. 94506 whichChief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh
Chandra Khare” continue writing checks drawntosaid sold
property locatedat (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 in(2015)
g. DMVCaliforniaDriver License #E2336392 filedas ProSe Plaintiff,
“Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStatesof
America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein
exhibit (A) insupport of this complaint made hereinshowing
address (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506whichChief
Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” continue writing
checks drawn tosaid “soldproperty”locatedat (616) Bourne Ct.
Danville CA. 94506 in(2015)..?
(20)
Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates
of America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein“Declare”, State,
and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”
In that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinht. 5ft. 5”
wt. 160 (Lbs) eyes (Black) borninthe 1940’s January 31st
as so claimedwith
DMVfor State of Californiawiththe usage of the “Title” Dr. Khare
Did inall factual circumstance andevents withinthe Co-Plaintiff(s)
“UnitedStates of America”Jurisdiction, Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh
Chandra Khare”, in the same patternand practice describedinparagraph(17,18,
and 19) above purchasedonce again Real estate Properties inthe “NewJersey”-
Hopewell “Township”know to be properties Namely 156 CoburnRoad
Pennington, NJ08534
(21)
Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates
of America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein“Declare”, State,
and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”
In that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, on the exact
date of “August 26th
2015 issuedanother Personal check drawnonCitibank
N.A. BR # 128 37-57 74th
Street JacksonHeights, NewYork 11372 account #
021000098:9947509687:0121
To Prose Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereininthis time in the
amount of the Amount of $1,220.00U.S. Dollars:
a. Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinfurther
providedsaidcheck datedAug 26th
2015 fromthe Newaddress 156
Coburn Road Pennington, NJ08534 drawnonce again from “Citibank”
b. the secondCheck of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”,
hereinwritten for $1,220.00 U.S. Dollars was once again process at PLS
Check Cashers 5823 Gulf Freeway HoustonTexas 77023viatheir “Wire
Services”onbehalf of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII
herein
c. “However”this time on27th
of August 2015 inthe am hour PLS Check
Cashers at 5823 Gulf Freeway HoustonTexas 77023 toldProSe
Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton”hereinafterPLS Check Cashers first
ran secondcheck through their electronic checking devise, that their
district manger statedthey wouldnot be cashing said secondCheck of
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinwritten for
$1,220.00U.S. Dollars
d. the Newaddress locatedat 156 Coburn Road Pennington, NJ08534
under direct ownershipof Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra
Khare”, hereinandon April 19th
, 2013 “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”,
hereinfully once again soldsaid property 156 CoburnRoad
Pennington, NJ08534 this time for $365,000.00U.S. Dollars as
describedinthe Personal Check filedas Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles
HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStatesof America”et al, and Co-
Plaintiff “State of Texas” et al, hereinexhibit (B) insupport of this
complaint made herein
e. Said Personal check of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra
Khare”, hereinissuedfrom“Citibank”was Drawn on the exact same
address of 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 toa home which
was soldon “April 19th
, 2013 for $365,000.00 U.S. Dollars “However”
but saidcheck for “Constructionservices”was made out on August
22th
2015.. To Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII…herein..?
f. Said check was made out from a sold resident said Chief Defendant
“Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, herein“assuming”having no (legal)
control over (once) again in 2015… since saidproperty namely
“Material facts”supporting that “April 19th
, 2013 156 CoburnRoad
Pennington, NJ08534 for $365,000.00 U.S. Dollars
g. Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al andCo-Defendant(s) Geeta
International “Legal Division”et al collectively having placement of
GeetaFoods - NewYork, USA SatelliteOffice Jackson Heights, NYTel:
+1-917-573-1923 Fax: +1-413-581-7495Email: info@geetaint.com
h. Jackson Heights, NY
i. Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) Geeta
International “Legal Division”et al “GeetaFoods - NewYork, USA
Satellite Officeis in the same Location City) for Citibank N.A. BR # 128
37-57 74th
Street JacksonHeights, NewYork 11372account #
021000098:9947509687:0121 which Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh
Chandra Khare”, providedsaidcheck dated Aug 26th
2015 fromthe
Newaddress 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 drawnonce again
from “Citibank”from a soldresident said Chief Defendant “Doctor
DineshChandra Khare”, herein“assuming”having no (legal) control
over (once) again in 2015… since saidproperty namely “Material facts”
supporting that “April 19th
, 2013 156 CoburnRoadPennington, NJ
08534 Property was soldfor $365,000.00 U.S. Dollars whichsaid Chief
Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinin2015 once again
writtencheck froma Property sold…..?
(22)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”,
State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” ProSe Plaintiff on his
(Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”
et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al states, declare andAffirm
That all factual circumstances andextreme sound“logical circumstance”
and events adding (Pro Se Plaintiff) personal dealing withChief Defendant
“Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, hereininthat
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, (whom) actually
whomever he maybe hereinis “actually physically”one in the same “Gaeta
International et al” a International (RICO) EnterpriseCartel based in Bangkok ,
Thailand
(23)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”,
State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” ProSe Plaintiff on his
(Personal) behalf and on the behalf of
Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of
Texas”et al states, declare andaffirms that
Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC (Email) address namely
geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; is the direct email Link to a International (RICO)
Enterprise Cartelbased in Bangkok , Thailand
In comparison to:
GEETA brandedWholesale DistributionandInternational Trading
2194/48-49 Bang Koh Laem, Bangkok - 10120 Thailand Tel : (+662) 291-1968Fax:
(+662) 688-1146Email: listed as: contact@geetaint.com
Retail SupermarketsValueMart Co Ltd. Soi 20 Central SukhumvitBangkok ,
Thailand Tel: (+662) 261-5955 Fax: (+662) 261-5859 Email: Listed as:
info@geetaint.com
Restaurants: Soi12, SukhumvitRoad, Bangkok , Thailand Tel: (+662) 653-
1171 Tel: (+662) 653-1173Fax:(+662) 663-3721Email: Listed as:
info@geetaint.com
(24)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”,
State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” ProSe Plaintiff on his
(Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”
et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al states, declare andAffirmthat
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, having beenfurtherance said
Specifically, “International RICO Racket” toDefraud“UnitedStates of
America”as a Whole”in Violationof 18 U.S.C. § 371 §371 withall (Defendant(s)
and Co-Defendant(s) collectively committedto“Conspiracy tocommit offense
or to defraudUnitedStates”
Specifically, violationsof “18 USC § 1343 RICO Wire Fraud”, and
Specifically, violationsof RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) “Money
laundering”
Specifically, violationsof RICO statue “18 USC § 1341 “Mail Fraud”,
To (Now) added that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”,
Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al andCo-Defendant(s) “Geeta
International “Legal Division”et al” Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Co.
Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare herein
engaging fully in collusion, concert andconspirer against Co-Plaintiff “United
States of America”et al Title III: International Money Laundering Abatement
and Financial Anti-TerrorismAct of 2001.
(25)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”,
State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff on his
(Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”
et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al
States, Declare andAffirmthat Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al
and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al” GeetaFoods -
California, USA Satellite Office andGeetaFoods - NewYork, USA SatelliteOffice
GeetaFoods - California, USA Satellite Office
Danville, CA 94506
Tel: +1-925-282-3482
Fax: +1-682-292-2887
Email: info-feedback@geetaint.com
GeetaFoods - NewYork, USA SatelliteOffice
Jackson Heights, NY
Tel: +1-917-573-1923
Fax: +1-413-581-7495
Email: info@geetaint.com
Having been(Physically) usedinpast, present to“facilitateand
formulated”withinCo-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”et al Jurisdictionsaid
“International RICO EnterpriseRacket”engaging in“among other things”
“Mutable Counts”of interstate“Mail andWire Fraud”, and “International Mail
and Wire Fraud”,
International Money Laundering, scheme of things tooperate collectively
as a (secret) “EnterpriseRacket”withinthe Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStatesof
America”Jurisdictionviainadditiona (RICO) scheme of things through
“Satellite Transmission”
(26)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”,
State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff on his
(Personal) behalf and on the behalf of
Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of
Texas”et al in that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” hereinon
the exact time frame of July 17th
as describedinparagraph(9) above:
(July 17th
2015)
Thanks Louis. I havegone California on three days holiday. Shall speak to you on
return Monday or Tuesday
Sent frommy iPhone
(July 17th
2015)
Have safetrip :-)
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”hereinfully engage in
same continuance (RICO) “scheme of things throughtoinclude “Satellite
Transmission”withinthe Co-Plaintiff(s) Jurisdictionwithinthe State of
Californiaat Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al andCo-Defendant(s)
“GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”undisclosed“Satellite Transmission”
location.
(27)
(July 17th
2015)
Thanks Louis. I havegone California on three days holiday. Shall speak to you on
return Monday or Tuesday
Sent frommy iPhone
(July 17th
2015)
Have safetrip :-)
(28)
Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfurther “Declare”,
“State”, and “Affirm”before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”for his own personal
behalf as follows:
a. Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare” hereinlegally with
property holdings at 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534, 616 BourneCt
Danville CA 94506, 3429 NottinghamLninMontgomery, Texas 77356 andthe
fourthproperty alsolocatedin Montgomery, Texas ina private gated
community on a golf course on a (Nice) Lake in which Chief Defendant “Doctor
DineshChandra Khare” didin fact took ProSe Plaintiff to, (2) properties onthe
exact date of “July 7th
2015 12:00 (Noon) amhour namely
3429 NottinghamLninMontgomery, Texas 77356 and*Photos on file
withChief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare present onproperty
located in Montgomery, Texas ina private gatedcommunity on a golf course on
a (Nice) Lake in saidphotos.
(29)
As one suchproperty namely 3429 NottinghamLninMontgomery, Texas
77356 already under contract signedby the ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles
HamiltonII” on the exact time frame of 12:10 am hour at “The HiltonHotel”
locatedat 12400 Greens point Dr. HoustonTexas 77060
On the 22nd
day of August 2015 (all) being physically conductedon “video
surveillance”of the “HiltonHotel”as well as on photos on file withthe Pro Se
Plaintiff hereinandChief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, in said
photos
To include Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, on the
exact time frame of 12:10 am hour CaliforniaDriver License #E2336392 Expire
01-31-2018home address at 616 Bourne Ct Danville CA 94506 was (Photocopy)
and Phone Message wire Communication(IM) acopy to saidChief Defendant
“Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, himself at the exact time frame of 12:10 am
witha photoattachedof the ProSe Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII”herein
U.S. veteranphotoI.D.
b. Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, first stepcommitted
to “Medical Battery”tosubmitting ProSe Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII
hereintoa unwanted secretly “Forensic Mental Evaluation” over aperiodof
several claimbusiness meeting dinners inMontgomery Texas startfirst
occurredon the exact date of “July 7th
2015
After the enhancement barging planof showing off the Nice (2) properties
as describedinparagraph28(a) above Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra
Khare”, hereinwiththe false, fraudulent pretenses, representations of material
facts that there are indeed(3) other properties locatedinMontgomery Texas
for a total of (5) being a party tothis Business dealings on“July 7th
2015 whicha
constructionbusinessnegations didinfact assumedat a India Restaurant in
Montgomery Texas whichthe Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”,
hereinfurther with
“Intent”false, fraudulent pretenses, representations of material facts
statedof having a Builder submitting abid of $56 per sq. ft. for complete
constructionplanon all (5) properties locatedin Montgomery Texas for a total
cost of $103,1523429 being the unidentifiedContractor bidfor start upNew
Constructionon3429 NottinghamLninMontgomery, Texas 77356
c. Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” hereinlegally never
made any “formal discussionor notice or legal rebuttal”of material facts
concerning the ProSe Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinand all acting
subs-contractors as being described
Alex- Framer- 281-467-6656
Ray-Concrete-713-539-8577
Melvin-Plumber-713-534-2368
Carlos -Electrical-832-707-6180
being not involvedinthe Constructionof (5) propertieslocatedin
Montgomery Texas whichall said Sub Contractor lower there combine labor
cost to accommodate Defendant and Co-Defendant(s) collectively
(30)
Pro Se Plaintiff further Assert, declareandaffirmbefore the “Honorable
Justice”Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” and Co-Defendant(s)
GeetaGroupLLC et al, hereinlegally was fully aware, with intent knowledge to
engage in deceiving , trickery, directedat ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles
HamiltonII” construction negations base on$46. Per sq. ft. (RICO) price fixing
scheme of things for total constructionof
(5) properties withafuture cost inexcess of $425,000.00 U.S. Dollars
under the fully false, fraudulent pretenses, representations of “material facts”
that there are indeed(5) properties locatedin Montgomery Texas andready for
“New Home Construction”whichinfact was false, and Materially bogus,
Pro Se Plaintiff showsuch Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra
Khare” Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC et al, hereinlegally was fully aware,
withintent knowledge todeceive, trickery, as described transmits or causes to
be transmittedby means of phone communications, including
“Internet wire”(emails) andPhone Message wire Communication(IM)
and “Satellite Transmission” withCo-Defendant(s) TrillionaireAssetset al, Co-
Defendant(s) Trillionaire Realty et al, Co-Defendant(s) andCo-Defendant(s) Greg
Miller fully conspire involvedintent knowledge todeceive, trickery, andcausing
his Personal added
“Deceptive Trade Practices Acts, Broughtinconjunctionwith“Common
law” Fraud and Breachof Contract, and “Tortious InterferencewithExisting
Contract”,
(31)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII herein furtherance’s “Declare”,
State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis
Charles HamiltonII” herein onhis (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of
Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America” et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of
Texas”et al in that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” hereinon
the exact time frame of the Monthof “June”, “July” and “August”of 2015
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta
International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et
al”, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta
Group LLC, and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare hereinengaging fully incollusion,
concert and conspirer
Subjecting the ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” a naturalized
citizenof “UnitedStates of America”and many, many, others similarly same
qualify under “Constitute Citizenship”guaranteedprotectionof the judicial
branch of the
Co-Plaintiff(s) “UntiedStatesof America” et al “judicial branch” of
government and the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” a naturalized
citizenof “UnitedStates of America”and many, many, others similarly same
qualify under “Constitute Citizenshipguaranteedprotectionof Co-Plaintiff(s)
“State of Texas”et al Judicial branchof government
Which ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” being a (USN) Veteran
should100% add such qualify “Constitute Citizenshipguaranteedprotectionof
the judicial branch of the Co-Plaintiff(s) “UntiedStates of America”et al Judicial
Government and the Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al Judicial Branch of
Government
(32)
The Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” a naturalizedcitizenof
“UnitedStates of America”and many, many, others similarly same qualify
under “Constitute Citizenshipguaranteedprotectionof the “Judicial Branches”
of The Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and the Co-Plaintiff(s)
“State of Texas”et al
However Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, Co-
Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta
International “Legal Division”et al”, “Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational Co.
Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare herein
Engaging further fully incollusion, concert andconspirer against The Pro
Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” a naturalizedcitizenof “UnitedStates of
America”and many, many, others similarly same qualify under
“Constitute Citizenshipguaranteedprotectionof the “Judicial Branches”
of The Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and the Co-Plaintiff(s)
“State of Texas”et al in that
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta
International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et
al”, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta
Group LLC, and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare herein deniedDue process of the
law and equal protectionof the law of The Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof
America”et al and the Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al in this
“International RICO Cartel Enterprise Racket” of “Deceptive Trade
Practices Acts, anddidin all factual circumstances obtain, concealedand
destroyeda“ConstructionContract”of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles
HamiltonII hereinwithinthe
“International Jurisdiction”of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra
Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta
International “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Co.
Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare
herein Namely “Thailand” fully deniedProSe Plaintiff “Due process andEqual
Protectionof The Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and the Co-
Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al Constitutional rightsover said
Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” a naturalizedcitizenof “United
States of America”and many, many, others similarly same qualify under
“Constitute Citizenshipguaranteedprotectionof the “Judicial Branches”of The
Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and the Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of
Texas”et al having business dealing withthis
“International RICO Cartel Enterprise Racket”describedfully herein
having already beeninstitutedandfully commenced inthe “State of California”
The State of Texas, “The State of NewYork” and (Now) upon informationand
strong belief, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational, Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta
International “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC also
knows tobe “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” , Co-Defendant Vipul Khare And
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”,
Operating in(RICO) same “patternand practice”scheme of things for
sometime inthe “prime real-estatearea”of “Bogota Florida”whichSecretary
for the “State of Florida”records indicating showing “GEETA International Co.
Ltd.” Having so physically operating for a time in Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of
America“Jurisdictionnamely the “State of Florida”operating under the “Title”
“GEETA International Co. Ltd.”
As describedinparagraph (33) below Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh
Chandra Khare”, “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” “Managing Director”, location
“Bangkok Metropolitanarea, Thailand, “Industry “Food and Beverages” with
Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al “Logo”making “GEETA International
Co. Ltd.” AlsoCo-Defendant(s) anda official party to this “International RICO
Cartel EnterpriseRacket” against ProSe Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, Co-
Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”
et al herein.
(33)
Dr. D.C. Khare
Managing Director
Location
Bangkok Metropolitan Area, Thailand
Industry
Food & Beverages
Current
Websites
(34)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, Co-Plaintiff(s) “United
States of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al herein
furtherance’s “Declare”, State, andAffirmbefore the
“Honorable U.S. Justice” Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”,
Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al andCo-Defendant(s) “Geeta
International “Legal Division” et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-
Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.”
And Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare conspirer withextreme andhostile acts
and event to FraudCo-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and did in
factual circumstance subject ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII”herein,
and many, many, others
Similarly same having (American) “businessdealing”with Co-
Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC locatedat 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, in
Conroe, Texas 77304 toa foreignlegal rules andregulationJurisdictionstatusof
“Thailand”
Further this “International RICO CartelEnterpriseRacket”, conspireto,
and in fact did “Subjecting”the ProSe Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, herein
and many, many, others similarly same to “foreigncorruption”inbusiness
dealing,
Furtherance’s “Subjecting”the ProSe Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII,
hereinto “Cyber Fraud” and “aggravated Identity Theft” being conducted in
“Thailand” secretly far away from the “Judicial Branch” of Government of
the Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and Judicial Branchof
Government of Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al herein “equal protectionof
the law and due process, for all (American) citizens of the Co-Plaintiff(s) United
States of America and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” fully enjoyment and
protectionthereof.
(35)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of
America”et al herein onthe Behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al
furtherance’s “Declare”, State, andAffirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta
International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et
al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International
Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare collectively hereinhaving for
sometimes having as a Whole” International RICO Enterprise Cartel”being in
Violationof 18 U.S.C. § 371 §371 withall Defendant(s) andCo-Defendant(s)
committedto“Conspiracy to commit offense or todefraud UnitedStates”
(36)
Further this “International RICO Cartel EnterpriseRacket”, conspireto
defraud “United States” is alsobasedupon the International currency exchange
rate”of the Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”U.S. Dollars in that for each
conspirer committedandachieved todefraud “United States”this
“International RICO Cartel Enterprise Racket”,
Gaining a larger “monetary value”once depositing all illegal Money
laundering scheme of thing into eachforeign“International RICO Cartel
Enterprise Racket”, foreigncurrency exchange rate toshore up
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta
International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et
al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International
Co. Ltd.” AndCo-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare “Local and mainly “foreignAssets”
collectively inthis “International RICO CartelEnterpriseRacket”, conspire to
defraud“United States”
(37)
*For example (A) before the “Honorable Justice”
Said Personal check of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”,
hereinissuedfrom“Citibank”was Drawn on the exact same address of (616)
Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 toa home whichwas soldon January 2006 for
$1,075,000.00inJanuary 2006
$1,075,000.00 U.S. Dollars worth(today) in Thai Baht exchange rates
“Thailand” 38874150.00 Thai Baht
*For example (B) before the “Honorable Justice”
Said check datedAug 26th
2015 fromthe Newaddress 156 CoburnRoad
Pennington, NJ08534 drawnonce again from “Citibank” from a soldresident
said Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, herein“assuming”having
no (legal) control over (once) again in 2015…
Since saidproperty namely “Material facts”supporting that “April 19th
,
2013 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 Property was soldfor $365,000.00
U.S. Dollars
$365,000.00U.S. Dollars worth(today) in Thai Baht exchange rates
“Thailand” 13202780.00Thai Baht
*For example (C) before the “Honorable Justice”
Said Personal check of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”,
hereinissuedfrom“Citibank”was Drawn on the exact same address of (616)
Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 toa home whichwas soldon January 2006 for
$1,075,000.00inJanuary 2006
$1,075,000.00 U.S. Dollars worth(today) in Indian Rupee exchange rates
“Thailand” 70976875.00IndianRupee
*For example (D) before the “Honorable Justice”
Said check datedAug 26th
2015 fromthe Newaddress 156 CoburnRoad
Pennington, NJ08534 drawnonce again from “Citibank” from a soldresident
said Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, herein“assuming”having
no (legal) control over (once) again in 2015…
Since saidproperty namely “Material facts”supporting that “April 19th
,
2013 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 Property was soldfor $365,000.00
U.S. Dollars
$365,000.00U.S. Dollars worth(today) in exchange IndianRupee
exchange rates “India”24099125.00 IndianRupee
(38)
Which “Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton“ hereinfurtherance’s
“Declare”, State, andAffirmbefore the “Honorable Justice”onbehalf of Co-
Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”
et al this “International RICO Cartel Enterprise Racket”, scheme of things in
conspire todefraud
“UnitedStates”is alsobased “among other things” the “International
currency exchange rate”of the Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”U.S.
Dollars and that “Thai Baht” exchange rates “Thailand” and that “Indian Rupee”
exchange rates “India”which
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta
International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et
al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International
Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare
Collectively hereinhaving “Monetary ForeignHoldings, Assets, properties,
Corporations, Business, Companies, Retails, shops, import andexport, stores,
homes, cars, chattel ect… basedin“Thailand and “India” in that for each (RICO)
conspire committedandachievedtodefraud “UnitedStates”as a whole
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta
International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et
al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International
Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare
Collectively hereinhaving “Mutable Monetary ForeignHoldings, Assets,
properties, Corporations, Business, Companies, Retails, shop, import and
export, stores, homes, cars, chattel ect…is being (officially) financial shoredup
and monetary secured onsaidexchange rate from (Financial Global) marketing
collapsing disastersby focusing on “among other things”a scheming
“International RICO Cartel Enterprise Racket”, of Chief Defendant “Doctor
DineshChandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-
Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”,
Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International
Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare todefraud Co-Plaintiff(s)
“UnitedStates of America”et al in a fraudulent “patternand practice”
fully up to date currently engaging inamong other things a(RICO) scheme of
things inprime real-estate now (active) infraudactivates engagedinCo-
Plaintiff(s) Jurisdictionnamely
(Texas) in a International “Money Laundering “scheme of things”within
the Jurisdictionof Co-Plaintiff(s) “United Statesof America”et al and withinthe
JurisdictionCo-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al Jurisdiction collectively
Committedtoand engaging in conspirer by all Chief Defendant “Doctor
DineshChandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and
Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co-
Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC,
Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.”and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul
Khare collectively conspire toFraud said“UnitedStates of America” and Texas
Namely Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”et al and namely Co-
Plaintiff “State of Texas” et al herein
(39)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of
America”et al hereinonthe Behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al
furtherance’s “Declare”, State, andAffirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”
Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta
International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et
al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International
Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare collectively hereinhaving intheir
“International RICO Cartel”
Namely GeetaInternational Co. Ltd. “Shipping & Marine Supplier”based
in “Bangkok “Thailand” among other “International (Locations) Geeta
International Co. Ltd. “Shipping & Marine Supplier”having Internationally
foreignshipping assets and making such“Port of Calls”
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”,
State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”
Namely Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational Co. Ltd. “Shipping & Marine
Supplier” Having formulated additional “International RICO Enterprise Racket”
scheme fully engaging in among other things “Mutable Counts” inHiding,
obscuring, and transporting (American) goods revivedinthis Money launder
(RICO) scheme of things back to Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra
Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and
Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co-
Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.”
and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare “International RICO Cartel”, mutable
Monetary ForeignHoldings, Assets, properties, Corporations, Business,
Companies, Retails, shops, import andexport business, stores, and homes.
(40)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of
America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al furtherance’s “Declare”,
State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” this “International RICO
Cartel EnterpriseRacket”, schemeof things inconspire todefraud
“UnitedStates” upon informationand belief Chief Defendant “Doctor
DineshChandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and
Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co-
Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.”
and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare “International RICO Cartel”,
Having furtherance devisedaformulation, structure, monetary laundering
(RICO) systemwithinthe Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates of America”et al
Jurisdictioninthat as follows:
1. The exact same address of (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 toa
home whichwas sold on January 2006 for $1,075,000.00 but saidcheck
for “Constructionservices”was made out on August 22nd
2015..And
the Personal Check filedas ProSe Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”,
Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStatesof America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of
Texas”et al, hereinexhibit (B) insupport of this complaint made
herein
2. And SaidPersonal check of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra
Khare”, hereinissuedfrom“Citibank” which was Drawn on the exact
same address of 156 Coburn Road Pennington, NJ08534 toa home
which was sold on “April 19th
, 2013 for $365,000.00 U.S. Dollars
“However” but said check for “Constructionservices”was made out on
August 22th
2015…
3. $1,075,000.00+$365,000.00 =$1.44 (Million) U.S. Dollars ina
“International RICO Cartel”, property scam(among others) inwhich
said Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s)
GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational
“Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-
Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.”and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul
Khare “International RICO Cartel”, racket hereinhaving “Soldsaid
property “among others”toinclude but not limitedtonone other
collectively “themselves”inthis (RICO) racket tofurtherance’s commit
fraud of the Co-Plaintiff “The UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-
Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al in the past, present andfuture
obscuring, hiding, laundering sucha well integratedconglomerateof
“International Business inits owntax free have zone hiddenwell
within Co-Plaintiff (UnitedStates of America) scheme of things being
namely a International Corporationof mutable business legal as such
however well as facts proving hereina turn intoa well formulated
“International RICO EnterpriseRacket”basedin“Thailand”
4. Namely Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-
Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta
International “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC,
(40)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of
America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al furtherance’s “Declare”,
State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” inthat
Namely Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinhaving
“Possibly”toaid furtherance’s ainternational (RICO) scheme of things against
the Pro Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates of
America”et al,
And Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al to include the “State of California
and The State of “NewYork”…among others, infalse impersonationas a License
(Doctor) withinthe Jurisdictionof Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”et al
and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”in direct violationof TEX OC. CODE ANN. §
164.052:Texas Statutes - Section164.052: as describedinparagraph
TEX OC. CODEANN. § 164.052 :Texas Statutes - Section164.052:
PROHIBITED PRACTICES BY PHYSICIAN OR LICENSEAPPLICANT(a) A physicianor
an applicant for a license topractice medicine commits aprohibitedpracticeif
that person:(1) submits tothe board a false or misleading statement, document,
or certificateinan applicationfor a license;(2) presents tothe boarda license,
certificate, or diplomathat was illegally or fraudulently obtained;(3) commits
fraud or deceptionintaking or passing an examination;(4) uses alcohol or drugs
in an intemperate manner that, inthe board's opinion, couldendanger a
patient's life;(5) commits unprofessional or dishonorable conduct that is likely
to deceive or defraudthe public, as providedby Section164.053,
Or injure the public;(6) uses anadvertising statement that is false,
misleading, or deceptive;(7) advertises professional superiority or the
performance of professional service inasuperior manner if that advertising is
not readily subject toverification;(8) purchases, sells, barters, or uses, or offers
to purchase, sell, barter, or use, amedical degree, license, certificate, or
diploma, or a transcript of a license, certificate, or diplomain or incident toan
applicationto the board for a license topractice medicine;(9) alters, with
fraudulent intent, amedical license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a
medical license, certificate, or diploma;(10) uses amedical license, certificate, or
diploma, or a transcript of a medical license, certificate, or diplomathat has
been:(A) fraudulently purchasedor issued;(B) counterfeited;or(C) materially
altered;(11) impersonates or acts as proxy for another personin an examination
requiredby this subtitle for amedical license;(12) engages inconduct that
subverts or attempts tosubvert anexaminationprocess requiredby this subtitle
for a medical license;(13) impersonates aphysicianor permits another touse
the person's license or certificate topractice medicine inthis state;(14) directly
or indirectly employs apersonwhose license topractice medicine has been
suspended, canceled, or revoked;(15) associates inthe practice of medicine with
a person:(A) whose license topractice medicine has beensuspended, canceled,
or revoked;or(B) who has beenconvictedof the unlawful practice of medicine
in this state or elsewhere;
(16) performs or procures a criminal abortion, aids or abets in the
procuring of a criminal abortion, attempts toperformor procure a criminal
abortion, or attempts toaid or abet the performance or procurement of a
criminal abortion;(17) directly or indirectly aids or abets the practice of
medicine by a person, partnership, association, or corporationthat is not
licensedtopractice medicine by the board;(18) performs anabortionon a
woman who is pregnant witha viable unbornchild during the thirdtrimester of
the pregnancy unless:
(A) the abortion is necessary toprevent the deathof the woman;(B) the
viable unborn childhas a severe, irreversible brainimpairment;or(C) the
woman is diagnosedwitha significant likelihoodof suffering imminent severe,
irreversiblebraindamage or imminent severe, irreversibleparalysis;or(19)
performs an abortionon an unemancipatedminor without the writtenconsent
of the child's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian or without a court
order, as providedby Section33.003or 33.004,
Family Code, authorizing the minor to consent tothe abortion, unless the
physicianconcludes that on the basis of the physician's good faithclinical
judgment, a conditionexists that complicatesthe medical conditionof the
pregnant minor and necessitatesthe immediate abortionof her pregnancy to
avert her deathor to avoid a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major
bodily functionand that there is insufficient time toobtainthe consent of the
child's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian.(b) For purposes of
Subsection(a)(12), conduct that subverts or attempts tosubvertthe medical
licensing examinationprocess includes, as prescribedby boardrules, conduct
that violates:(1) the security of the examinationmaterials;(2) the standardof
test administration;or(3) the accreditationprocess.(c) The boardshall adopt the
forms necessary for physicians toobtainthe consent requiredfor an abortionto
be performedonan unemancipatedminor under Subsection(a). The form
executedtoobtainconsent or any other requireddocumentationmust be
retainedby the physicianuntil the later of the fifthanniversary of the date of
the minor's majority or the seventhanniversary of the date the physician
receivedor createdthe documentationfor the record.
(41)
” In Direction violationof CaliforniaPenal Code 529 PC
“False impersonation”(alsoknownas “false personation”) is a crime in
California. Under CaliforniaPenal Code 529 PC, you commit the crime of false
impersonationwhenyou:
1. Falsely personate someone (that is, pretendtobe them) intheir public or
private capacity;and
2. Performany other act that might cause the personyou are impersonating to
become liable toa lawsuit or prosecutionor become obligatedtopay money, or
which might cause you to get some benefit fromimpersonating him/her.
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al
Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al

More Related Content

What's hot

Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)Daniel Alouidor
 
Martina Vandenberg Keynote Presentation
Martina Vandenberg Keynote PresentationMartina Vandenberg Keynote Presentation
Martina Vandenberg Keynote Presentationthistlefarmsslides
 
Qui Tam Action Legal Papers Brought by Bernard Lisitza Against Pharmacy Compa...
Qui Tam Action Legal Papers Brought by Bernard Lisitza Against Pharmacy Compa...Qui Tam Action Legal Papers Brought by Bernard Lisitza Against Pharmacy Compa...
Qui Tam Action Legal Papers Brought by Bernard Lisitza Against Pharmacy Compa...Behn Wyetzner, Chartered
 
Brayshaw order
Brayshaw orderBrayshaw order
Brayshaw orderTerry81
 
Defendants dismas charities,inc.,ana gispert,derek thomas and adams leshota's...
Defendants dismas charities,inc.,ana gispert,derek thomas and adams leshota's...Defendants dismas charities,inc.,ana gispert,derek thomas and adams leshota's...
Defendants dismas charities,inc.,ana gispert,derek thomas and adams leshota's...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Document 112 (Main)
Document 112 (Main)Document 112 (Main)
Document 112 (Main)Byliner1
 
Defendants' brief in opposition to plaintiffs' temporary injunction motions (...
Defendants' brief in opposition to plaintiffs' temporary injunction motions (...Defendants' brief in opposition to plaintiffs' temporary injunction motions (...
Defendants' brief in opposition to plaintiffs' temporary injunction motions (...TravisBubenik
 
FindLaw | al-Marri Terror Indictment
FindLaw | al-Marri Terror IndictmentFindLaw | al-Marri Terror Indictment
FindLaw | al-Marri Terror IndictmentLegalDocs
 
Lambert MOTION to File SUMMARY JUDGEMENT by Movant Case No. 5-14-cv-02259 Sep...
Lambert MOTION to File SUMMARY JUDGEMENT by Movant Case No. 5-14-cv-02259 Sep...Lambert MOTION to File SUMMARY JUDGEMENT by Movant Case No. 5-14-cv-02259 Sep...
Lambert MOTION to File SUMMARY JUDGEMENT by Movant Case No. 5-14-cv-02259 Sep...Stan Caterbone
 
2009 BIOL503 Class 4 Supporting doc: Civil Complaint Ftc Androgel 090202andro...
2009 BIOL503 Class 4 Supporting doc: Civil Complaint Ftc Androgel 090202andro...2009 BIOL503 Class 4 Supporting doc: Civil Complaint Ftc Androgel 090202andro...
2009 BIOL503 Class 4 Supporting doc: Civil Complaint Ftc Androgel 090202andro...Karol Pessin
 
Darvocet ordergenerics
Darvocet ordergenericsDarvocet ordergenerics
Darvocet ordergenericsmzamoralaw
 
United States vs. Herbert Guest (Highlighted)
United States vs. Herbert Guest (Highlighted)United States vs. Herbert Guest (Highlighted)
United States vs. Herbert Guest (Highlighted)VogelDenise
 
Dawn Estep: Sued for Fraud
Dawn Estep: Sued for FraudDawn Estep: Sued for Fraud
Dawn Estep: Sued for Fraudgojit
 
Family Detention: Full Speed Ahead.
Family Detention: Full Speed Ahead. Family Detention: Full Speed Ahead.
Family Detention: Full Speed Ahead. amjolaw
 
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (1)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (1)Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (1)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (1)Daniel Alouidor
 
Negro plaintiff factual asset summary ii on harry c. arthur esq. et al
Negro plaintiff factual asset summary ii on harry c. arthur esq. et alNegro plaintiff factual asset summary ii on harry c. arthur esq. et al
Negro plaintiff factual asset summary ii on harry c. arthur esq. et alLouis Charles Hamilton II
 
Два федеральных агента, которые вели дело Silk Road, обвиняются в краже битко...
Два федеральных агента, которые вели дело Silk Road, обвиняются в краже битко...Два федеральных агента, которые вели дело Silk Road, обвиняются в краже битко...
Два федеральных агента, которые вели дело Silk Road, обвиняются в краже битко...Anatol Alizar
 

What's hot (18)

Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.52.0 (1)
 
Martina Vandenberg Keynote Presentation
Martina Vandenberg Keynote PresentationMartina Vandenberg Keynote Presentation
Martina Vandenberg Keynote Presentation
 
Qui Tam Action Legal Papers Brought by Bernard Lisitza Against Pharmacy Compa...
Qui Tam Action Legal Papers Brought by Bernard Lisitza Against Pharmacy Compa...Qui Tam Action Legal Papers Brought by Bernard Lisitza Against Pharmacy Compa...
Qui Tam Action Legal Papers Brought by Bernard Lisitza Against Pharmacy Compa...
 
Brayshaw order
Brayshaw orderBrayshaw order
Brayshaw order
 
Defendants dismas charities,inc.,ana gispert,derek thomas and adams leshota's...
Defendants dismas charities,inc.,ana gispert,derek thomas and adams leshota's...Defendants dismas charities,inc.,ana gispert,derek thomas and adams leshota's...
Defendants dismas charities,inc.,ana gispert,derek thomas and adams leshota's...
 
Document 112 (Main)
Document 112 (Main)Document 112 (Main)
Document 112 (Main)
 
Defendants' brief in opposition to plaintiffs' temporary injunction motions (...
Defendants' brief in opposition to plaintiffs' temporary injunction motions (...Defendants' brief in opposition to plaintiffs' temporary injunction motions (...
Defendants' brief in opposition to plaintiffs' temporary injunction motions (...
 
FindLaw | al-Marri Terror Indictment
FindLaw | al-Marri Terror IndictmentFindLaw | al-Marri Terror Indictment
FindLaw | al-Marri Terror Indictment
 
Lambert MOTION to File SUMMARY JUDGEMENT by Movant Case No. 5-14-cv-02259 Sep...
Lambert MOTION to File SUMMARY JUDGEMENT by Movant Case No. 5-14-cv-02259 Sep...Lambert MOTION to File SUMMARY JUDGEMENT by Movant Case No. 5-14-cv-02259 Sep...
Lambert MOTION to File SUMMARY JUDGEMENT by Movant Case No. 5-14-cv-02259 Sep...
 
2009 BIOL503 Class 4 Supporting doc: Civil Complaint Ftc Androgel 090202andro...
2009 BIOL503 Class 4 Supporting doc: Civil Complaint Ftc Androgel 090202andro...2009 BIOL503 Class 4 Supporting doc: Civil Complaint Ftc Androgel 090202andro...
2009 BIOL503 Class 4 Supporting doc: Civil Complaint Ftc Androgel 090202andro...
 
Darvocet ordergenerics
Darvocet ordergenericsDarvocet ordergenerics
Darvocet ordergenerics
 
United States vs. Herbert Guest (Highlighted)
United States vs. Herbert Guest (Highlighted)United States vs. Herbert Guest (Highlighted)
United States vs. Herbert Guest (Highlighted)
 
Dawn Estep: Sued for Fraud
Dawn Estep: Sued for FraudDawn Estep: Sued for Fraud
Dawn Estep: Sued for Fraud
 
Family Detention: Full Speed Ahead.
Family Detention: Full Speed Ahead. Family Detention: Full Speed Ahead.
Family Detention: Full Speed Ahead.
 
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (1)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (1)Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (1)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (1)
 
Negro plaintiff factual asset summary ii on harry c. arthur esq. et al
Negro plaintiff factual asset summary ii on harry c. arthur esq. et alNegro plaintiff factual asset summary ii on harry c. arthur esq. et al
Negro plaintiff factual asset summary ii on harry c. arthur esq. et al
 
Два федеральных агента, которые вели дело Silk Road, обвиняются в краже битко...
Два федеральных агента, которые вели дело Silk Road, обвиняются в краже битко...Два федеральных агента, которые вели дело Silk Road, обвиняются в краже битко...
Два федеральных агента, которые вели дело Silk Road, обвиняются в краже битко...
 
uploadable
uploadableuploadable
uploadable
 

Viewers also liked

594eb4100f640523cfb7df7b0dd4f11b
594eb4100f640523cfb7df7b0dd4f11b594eb4100f640523cfb7df7b0dd4f11b
594eb4100f640523cfb7df7b0dd4f11bFagner Firmo
 
Louis charles hamilton ii. amend united states...
Louis charles hamilton ii. amend united states...Louis charles hamilton ii. amend united states...
Louis charles hamilton ii. amend united states...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Notice of default judgement against united states of america
Notice of default judgement against united states of americaNotice of default judgement against united states of america
Notice of default judgement against united states of americaLouis Charles Hamilton II
 
Macy's counter settlement offer louis charles hamilton ii
Macy's counter settlement offer louis charles hamilton iiMacy's counter settlement offer louis charles hamilton ii
Macy's counter settlement offer louis charles hamilton iiLouis Charles Hamilton II
 
In the united states district court plaintiff motion in oppostion to dismiss
In the united states district court plaintiff motion in oppostion to dismissIn the united states district court plaintiff motion in oppostion to dismiss
In the united states district court plaintiff motion in oppostion to dismissLouis Charles Hamilton II
 
AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...
AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...
AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
President (obama) vs. united states of america 2011 financial coup'
President (obama) vs. united states of america 2011 financial coup'President (obama) vs. united states of america 2011 financial coup'
President (obama) vs. united states of america 2011 financial coup'Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit...
Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit...Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit...
Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Harry c. arthur third party request for admision (america)
Harry c. arthur third party request for admision (america)Harry c. arthur third party request for admision (america)
Harry c. arthur third party request for admision (america)Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Cmdr bluefin halloween ii its bloody soaking awsome
Cmdr bluefin halloween ii its bloody soaking awsomeCmdr bluefin halloween ii its bloody soaking awsome
Cmdr bluefin halloween ii its bloody soaking awsomeLouis Charles Hamilton II
 
President “Barack Obama” “Heart to Heart” Honest Understanding for “Expedited...
President “Barack Obama” “Heart to Heart” Honest Understanding for “Expedited...President “Barack Obama” “Heart to Heart” Honest Understanding for “Expedited...
President “Barack Obama” “Heart to Heart” Honest Understanding for “Expedited...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Crooked hurricane katrina attorney willie m. zanders et al notice of appeal
Crooked hurricane katrina attorney willie m. zanders et al notice of appealCrooked hurricane katrina attorney willie m. zanders et al notice of appeal
Crooked hurricane katrina attorney willie m. zanders et al notice of appealLouis Charles Hamilton II
 
1920’s photography
1920’s  photography1920’s  photography
1920’s photographylittlebig1994
 
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. "Attorney at Law" Considered Pro Se ...
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. "Attorney at Law" Considered Pro Se ...Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. "Attorney at Law" Considered Pro Se ...
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. "Attorney at Law" Considered Pro Se ...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Moo ha-ha-ha “cmdr. bluefin” halloween special iv… it’s bloody soakin...
Moo ha-ha-ha “cmdr. bluefin” halloween special iv… it’s bloody soakin...Moo ha-ha-ha “cmdr. bluefin” halloween special iv… it’s bloody soakin...
Moo ha-ha-ha “cmdr. bluefin” halloween special iv… it’s bloody soakin...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 

Viewers also liked (20)

594eb4100f640523cfb7df7b0dd4f11b
594eb4100f640523cfb7df7b0dd4f11b594eb4100f640523cfb7df7b0dd4f11b
594eb4100f640523cfb7df7b0dd4f11b
 
Louis charles hamilton ii. amend united states...
Louis charles hamilton ii. amend united states...Louis charles hamilton ii. amend united states...
Louis charles hamilton ii. amend united states...
 
Notice of default judgement against united states of america
Notice of default judgement against united states of americaNotice of default judgement against united states of america
Notice of default judgement against united states of america
 
Macy's counter settlement offer louis charles hamilton ii
Macy's counter settlement offer louis charles hamilton iiMacy's counter settlement offer louis charles hamilton ii
Macy's counter settlement offer louis charles hamilton ii
 
4.4pptx
4.4pptx4.4pptx
4.4pptx
 
Harry2 Houston Scrooge Attorney et al
Harry2 Houston Scrooge Attorney et alHarry2 Houston Scrooge Attorney et al
Harry2 Houston Scrooge Attorney et al
 
In the united states district court plaintiff motion in oppostion to dismiss
In the united states district court plaintiff motion in oppostion to dismissIn the united states district court plaintiff motion in oppostion to dismiss
In the united states district court plaintiff motion in oppostion to dismiss
 
AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...
AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...
AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...
 
Sherlock holmes final conclusion
Sherlock holmes final conclusionSherlock holmes final conclusion
Sherlock holmes final conclusion
 
President (obama) vs. united states of america 2011 financial coup'
President (obama) vs. united states of america 2011 financial coup'President (obama) vs. united states of america 2011 financial coup'
President (obama) vs. united states of america 2011 financial coup'
 
Conclusion u
Conclusion uConclusion u
Conclusion u
 
Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit...
Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit...Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit...
Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit...
 
Harry c. arthur third party request for admision (america)
Harry c. arthur third party request for admision (america)Harry c. arthur third party request for admision (america)
Harry c. arthur third party request for admision (america)
 
Motion for property lien
Motion for property lienMotion for property lien
Motion for property lien
 
Cmdr bluefin halloween ii its bloody soaking awsome
Cmdr bluefin halloween ii its bloody soaking awsomeCmdr bluefin halloween ii its bloody soaking awsome
Cmdr bluefin halloween ii its bloody soaking awsome
 
President “Barack Obama” “Heart to Heart” Honest Understanding for “Expedited...
President “Barack Obama” “Heart to Heart” Honest Understanding for “Expedited...President “Barack Obama” “Heart to Heart” Honest Understanding for “Expedited...
President “Barack Obama” “Heart to Heart” Honest Understanding for “Expedited...
 
Crooked hurricane katrina attorney willie m. zanders et al notice of appeal
Crooked hurricane katrina attorney willie m. zanders et al notice of appealCrooked hurricane katrina attorney willie m. zanders et al notice of appeal
Crooked hurricane katrina attorney willie m. zanders et al notice of appeal
 
1920’s photography
1920’s  photography1920’s  photography
1920’s photography
 
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. "Attorney at Law" Considered Pro Se ...
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. "Attorney at Law" Considered Pro Se ...Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. "Attorney at Law" Considered Pro Se ...
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. "Attorney at Law" Considered Pro Se ...
 
Moo ha-ha-ha “cmdr. bluefin” halloween special iv… it’s bloody soakin...
Moo ha-ha-ha “cmdr. bluefin” halloween special iv… it’s bloody soakin...Moo ha-ha-ha “cmdr. bluefin” halloween special iv… it’s bloody soakin...
Moo ha-ha-ha “cmdr. bluefin” halloween special iv… it’s bloody soakin...
 

Similar to Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al

Default motion for United States of America Docket No.CV-00808
Default motion for United States of America Docket No.CV-00808Default motion for United States of America Docket No.CV-00808
Default motion for United States of America Docket No.CV-00808Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
In the united states district court amend complaint No. 1:2011-CV-00240
In the united states district court amend complaint No. 1:2011-CV-00240In the united states district court amend complaint No. 1:2011-CV-00240
In the united states district court amend complaint No. 1:2011-CV-00240Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Motion for sanctions against The United States Attorney Eric H. Holder Jr. et al
Motion for sanctions against The United States Attorney Eric H. Holder Jr. et alMotion for sanctions against The United States Attorney Eric H. Holder Jr. et al
Motion for sanctions against The United States Attorney Eric H. Holder Jr. et alLouis Charles Hamilton II
 
FindLaw : Cal Prop. 8 Decision
FindLaw : Cal Prop. 8 DecisionFindLaw : Cal Prop. 8 Decision
FindLaw : Cal Prop. 8 DecisionLegalDocs
 
The rothschilds news followup
The rothschilds  news followupThe rothschilds  news followup
The rothschilds news followupAnonDownload
 
The rothschilds news followup
The rothschilds  news followupThe rothschilds  news followup
The rothschilds news followupRepentSinner
 
Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8
Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8
Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8Mauricio Albarracín Caballero
 
The rothschilds news followup
The rothschilds  news followupThe rothschilds  news followup
The rothschilds news followupRepentSinner
 
The rothschilds news followup
The rothschilds  news followupThe rothschilds  news followup
The rothschilds news followupAnonDownload
 
MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D., "At...
MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D., "At...MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D., "At...
MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D., "At...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Kristoffer Kjornes Living Man Affidavit of Truth Assertory Oath, Superior Par...
Kristoffer Kjornes Living Man Affidavit of Truth Assertory Oath, Superior Par...Kristoffer Kjornes Living Man Affidavit of Truth Assertory Oath, Superior Par...
Kristoffer Kjornes Living Man Affidavit of Truth Assertory Oath, Superior Par...KrisKjornes
 
Affidavit of Jeanette Audrey (Triplett) - A Must Read
Affidavit of Jeanette Audrey (Triplett) -  A Must ReadAffidavit of Jeanette Audrey (Triplett) -  A Must Read
Affidavit of Jeanette Audrey (Triplett) - A Must ReadChuck Thompson
 
Al Capone S Revenge An Essay On The Political Economy Of Pretextual Prosecution
Al Capone S Revenge  An Essay On The Political Economy Of Pretextual ProsecutionAl Capone S Revenge  An Essay On The Political Economy Of Pretextual Prosecution
Al Capone S Revenge An Essay On The Political Economy Of Pretextual ProsecutionAndrew Molina
 
Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...
Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...
Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...Kevin O'Shea
 
The top 3 problems that could kill the cannabis business
The top 3 problems that could kill the cannabis businessThe top 3 problems that could kill the cannabis business
The top 3 problems that could kill the cannabis businessgnosteek
 
Bill stamping legal opinion
Bill stamping legal opinionBill stamping legal opinion
Bill stamping legal opinionCharles Lenchner
 
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)VogelDenise
 
The Great Fraud of 1930–33
The Great Fraud of 1930–33The Great Fraud of 1930–33
The Great Fraud of 1930–33ICJ-ICC
 

Similar to Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al (20)

Default motion for United States of America Docket No.CV-00808
Default motion for United States of America Docket No.CV-00808Default motion for United States of America Docket No.CV-00808
Default motion for United States of America Docket No.CV-00808
 
In the united states district court amend complaint No. 1:2011-CV-00240
In the united states district court amend complaint No. 1:2011-CV-00240In the united states district court amend complaint No. 1:2011-CV-00240
In the united states district court amend complaint No. 1:2011-CV-00240
 
Motion for sanctions against The United States Attorney Eric H. Holder Jr. et al
Motion for sanctions against The United States Attorney Eric H. Holder Jr. et alMotion for sanctions against The United States Attorney Eric H. Holder Jr. et al
Motion for sanctions against The United States Attorney Eric H. Holder Jr. et al
 
FindLaw : Cal Prop. 8 Decision
FindLaw : Cal Prop. 8 DecisionFindLaw : Cal Prop. 8 Decision
FindLaw : Cal Prop. 8 Decision
 
The rothschilds news followup
The rothschilds  news followupThe rothschilds  news followup
The rothschilds news followup
 
The rothschilds news followup
The rothschilds  news followupThe rothschilds  news followup
The rothschilds news followup
 
Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8
Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8
Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8
 
The rothschilds news followup
The rothschilds  news followupThe rothschilds  news followup
The rothschilds news followup
 
The rothschilds news followup
The rothschilds  news followupThe rothschilds  news followup
The rothschilds news followup
 
MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D., "At...
MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D., "At...MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D., "At...
MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D., "At...
 
Kristoffer Kjornes Living Man Affidavit of Truth Assertory Oath, Superior Par...
Kristoffer Kjornes Living Man Affidavit of Truth Assertory Oath, Superior Par...Kristoffer Kjornes Living Man Affidavit of Truth Assertory Oath, Superior Par...
Kristoffer Kjornes Living Man Affidavit of Truth Assertory Oath, Superior Par...
 
Affidavit of Jeanette Audrey (Triplett) - A Must Read
Affidavit of Jeanette Audrey (Triplett) -  A Must ReadAffidavit of Jeanette Audrey (Triplett) -  A Must Read
Affidavit of Jeanette Audrey (Triplett) - A Must Read
 
Part ii amend complaint
Part ii amend complaintPart ii amend complaint
Part ii amend complaint
 
Al Capone S Revenge An Essay On The Political Economy Of Pretextual Prosecution
Al Capone S Revenge  An Essay On The Political Economy Of Pretextual ProsecutionAl Capone S Revenge  An Essay On The Political Economy Of Pretextual Prosecution
Al Capone S Revenge An Essay On The Political Economy Of Pretextual Prosecution
 
Six trillion dollars asset freeze
Six trillion dollars asset freezeSix trillion dollars asset freeze
Six trillion dollars asset freeze
 
Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...
Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...
Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...
 
The top 3 problems that could kill the cannabis business
The top 3 problems that could kill the cannabis businessThe top 3 problems that could kill the cannabis business
The top 3 problems that could kill the cannabis business
 
Bill stamping legal opinion
Bill stamping legal opinionBill stamping legal opinion
Bill stamping legal opinion
 
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)
 
The Great Fraud of 1930–33
The Great Fraud of 1930–33The Great Fraud of 1930–33
The Great Fraud of 1930–33
 

More from Louis Charles Hamilton II

Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”…...
Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”…...Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”…...
Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”…...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United Sta...
  Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United Sta...  Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United Sta...
Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United Sta...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”, “special report (india).
Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”, “special report (india).Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”, “special report (india).
Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”, “special report (india).Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”… “pirate curse” of the egyptian ...
Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”… “pirate curse” of the egyptian ...Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”… “pirate curse” of the egyptian ...
Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”… “pirate curse” of the egyptian ...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
“Cmdr. bluefin” (usn) presidential edition “halloween special” v… it’s “blood...
“Cmdr. bluefin” (usn) presidential edition “halloween special” v… it’s “blood...“Cmdr. bluefin” (usn) presidential edition “halloween special” v… it’s “blood...
“Cmdr. bluefin” (usn) presidential edition “halloween special” v… it’s “blood...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
June 15th 2015 Bluejack national golf club demand letter
June 15th 2015 Bluejack national golf club demand letterJune 15th 2015 Bluejack national golf club demand letter
June 15th 2015 Bluejack national golf club demand letterLouis Charles Hamilton II
 
Motion for contempt of court and order to show cause
Motion for contempt of court and order to show causeMotion for contempt of court and order to show cause
Motion for contempt of court and order to show causeLouis Charles Hamilton II
 
Louis Charles Hamilton II PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT No. A-180805
Louis Charles Hamilton II PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT No. A-180805 Louis Charles Hamilton II PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT No. A-180805
Louis Charles Hamilton II PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT No. A-180805 Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Pro Se “Louis Charles Hamilton II” REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, Cause No. 1:14-CV-...
Pro Se “Louis Charles Hamilton II” REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, Cause No. 1:14-CV-...Pro Se “Louis Charles Hamilton II” REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, Cause No. 1:14-CV-...
Pro Se “Louis Charles Hamilton II” REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, Cause No. 1:14-CV-...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...
In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...
In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
“United States Navy” Cmdr. Bluefin 2014 Smooth Fu king Public Notice”
“United States Navy” Cmdr. Bluefin 2014 Smooth Fu king Public Notice”“United States Navy” Cmdr. Bluefin 2014 Smooth Fu king Public Notice”
“United States Navy” Cmdr. Bluefin 2014 Smooth Fu king Public Notice”Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
President President "Barack Obama" 2014 "Reparations Act" for (Negro) African...
President President "Barack Obama" 2014 "Reparations Act" for (Negro) African...President President "Barack Obama" 2014 "Reparations Act" for (Negro) African...
President President "Barack Obama" 2014 "Reparations Act" for (Negro) African...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Real fact as They "Officially" Stand in 2014 For (Negro) Race and The "Unholy...
Real fact as They "Officially" Stand in 2014 For (Negro) Race and The "Unholy...Real fact as They "Officially" Stand in 2014 For (Negro) Race and The "Unholy...
Real fact as They "Officially" Stand in 2014 For (Negro) Race and The "Unholy...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
To: Live and Die in LDS Mormon..."Salt Lake City" Utah
To: Live and Die in LDS Mormon..."Salt Lake City" UtahTo: Live and Die in LDS Mormon..."Salt Lake City" Utah
To: Live and Die in LDS Mormon..."Salt Lake City" UtahLouis Charles Hamilton II
 
United states of america "XXX Crooked Ass" U. S. Assistant Attorney "Andrea L...
United states of america "XXX Crooked Ass" U. S. Assistant Attorney "Andrea L...United states of america "XXX Crooked Ass" U. S. Assistant Attorney "Andrea L...
United states of america "XXX Crooked Ass" U. S. Assistant Attorney "Andrea L...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Sherlock holmes adventure of lord nigel rupert holling berry chapter 8
Sherlock holmes adventure of lord nigel rupert holling berry chapter 8Sherlock holmes adventure of lord nigel rupert holling berry chapter 8
Sherlock holmes adventure of lord nigel rupert holling berry chapter 8Louis Charles Hamilton II
 

More from Louis Charles Hamilton II (20)

Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”…...
Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”…...Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”…...
Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”…...
 
Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United Sta...
  Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United Sta...  Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United Sta...
Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United Sta...
 
Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”, “special report (india).
Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”, “special report (india).Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”, “special report (india).
Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”, “special report (india).
 
Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”… “pirate curse” of the egyptian ...
Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”… “pirate curse” of the egyptian ...Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”… “pirate curse” of the egyptian ...
Cmdr. bluefin (usn) 2015 “great pirate race”… “pirate curse” of the egyptian ...
 
“Cmdr. bluefin” (usn) presidential edition “halloween special” v… it’s “blood...
“Cmdr. bluefin” (usn) presidential edition “halloween special” v… it’s “blood...“Cmdr. bluefin” (usn) presidential edition “halloween special” v… it’s “blood...
“Cmdr. bluefin” (usn) presidential edition “halloween special” v… it’s “blood...
 
June 15th 2015 Bluejack national golf club demand letter
June 15th 2015 Bluejack national golf club demand letterJune 15th 2015 Bluejack national golf club demand letter
June 15th 2015 Bluejack national golf club demand letter
 
Motion for contempt of court and order to show cause
Motion for contempt of court and order to show causeMotion for contempt of court and order to show cause
Motion for contempt of court and order to show cause
 
Louis Charles Hamilton II PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT No. A-180805
Louis Charles Hamilton II PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT No. A-180805 Louis Charles Hamilton II PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT No. A-180805
Louis Charles Hamilton II PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT No. A-180805
 
Pro Se “Louis Charles Hamilton II” REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, Cause No. 1:14-CV-...
Pro Se “Louis Charles Hamilton II” REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, Cause No. 1:14-CV-...Pro Se “Louis Charles Hamilton II” REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, Cause No. 1:14-CV-...
Pro Se “Louis Charles Hamilton II” REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, Cause No. 1:14-CV-...
 
In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...
In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...
In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...
 
Writ of execution
Writ of executionWrit of execution
Writ of execution
 
Writ for garnishment
Writ for garnishmentWrit for garnishment
Writ for garnishment
 
Summary judgment (autosaved)
Summary judgment (autosaved)Summary judgment (autosaved)
Summary judgment (autosaved)
 
Motion for sanctions
Motion for sanctionsMotion for sanctions
Motion for sanctions
 
“United States Navy” Cmdr. Bluefin 2014 Smooth Fu king Public Notice”
“United States Navy” Cmdr. Bluefin 2014 Smooth Fu king Public Notice”“United States Navy” Cmdr. Bluefin 2014 Smooth Fu king Public Notice”
“United States Navy” Cmdr. Bluefin 2014 Smooth Fu king Public Notice”
 
President President "Barack Obama" 2014 "Reparations Act" for (Negro) African...
President President "Barack Obama" 2014 "Reparations Act" for (Negro) African...President President "Barack Obama" 2014 "Reparations Act" for (Negro) African...
President President "Barack Obama" 2014 "Reparations Act" for (Negro) African...
 
Real fact as They "Officially" Stand in 2014 For (Negro) Race and The "Unholy...
Real fact as They "Officially" Stand in 2014 For (Negro) Race and The "Unholy...Real fact as They "Officially" Stand in 2014 For (Negro) Race and The "Unholy...
Real fact as They "Officially" Stand in 2014 For (Negro) Race and The "Unholy...
 
To: Live and Die in LDS Mormon..."Salt Lake City" Utah
To: Live and Die in LDS Mormon..."Salt Lake City" UtahTo: Live and Die in LDS Mormon..."Salt Lake City" Utah
To: Live and Die in LDS Mormon..."Salt Lake City" Utah
 
United states of america "XXX Crooked Ass" U. S. Assistant Attorney "Andrea L...
United states of america "XXX Crooked Ass" U. S. Assistant Attorney "Andrea L...United states of america "XXX Crooked Ass" U. S. Assistant Attorney "Andrea L...
United states of america "XXX Crooked Ass" U. S. Assistant Attorney "Andrea L...
 
Sherlock holmes adventure of lord nigel rupert holling berry chapter 8
Sherlock holmes adventure of lord nigel rupert holling berry chapter 8Sherlock holmes adventure of lord nigel rupert holling berry chapter 8
Sherlock holmes adventure of lord nigel rupert holling berry chapter 8
 

Recently uploaded

Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝soniya singh
 
如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书
如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书
如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书Fir L
 
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in IndiaArbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in IndiaNafiaNazim
 
如何办理提赛德大学毕业证(本硕)Teesside学位证书
如何办理提赛德大学毕业证(本硕)Teesside学位证书如何办理提赛德大学毕业证(本硕)Teesside学位证书
如何办理提赛德大学毕业证(本硕)Teesside学位证书Fir L
 
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一jr6r07mb
 
如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书
 如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书 如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书Fir sss
 
Key Factors That Influence Property Tax Rates
Key Factors That Influence Property Tax RatesKey Factors That Influence Property Tax Rates
Key Factors That Influence Property Tax RatesHome Tax Saver
 
Cleades Robinson's Commitment to Service
Cleades Robinson's Commitment to ServiceCleades Robinson's Commitment to Service
Cleades Robinson's Commitment to ServiceCleades Robinson
 
如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书
如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书
如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书FS LS
 
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmmEssentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm2020000445musaib
 
PPT on information technology laws description
PPT on information technology laws descriptionPPT on information technology laws description
PPT on information technology laws descriptionranaanish11062001
 
如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书SD DS
 
How You Can Get a Turkish Digital Nomad Visa
How You Can Get a Turkish Digital Nomad VisaHow You Can Get a Turkish Digital Nomad Visa
How You Can Get a Turkish Digital Nomad VisaBridgeWest.eu
 
Understanding Social Media Bullying: Legal Implications and Challenges
Understanding Social Media Bullying: Legal Implications and ChallengesUnderstanding Social Media Bullying: Legal Implications and Challenges
Understanding Social Media Bullying: Legal Implications and ChallengesFinlaw Associates
 
如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书Fs Las
 
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.pptFINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.pptjudeplata
 
如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书
 如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书 如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书Fir sss
 
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.pptFINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.pptjudeplata
 
Test Identification Parade & Dying Declaration.pptx
Test Identification Parade & Dying Declaration.pptxTest Identification Parade & Dying Declaration.pptx
Test Identification Parade & Dying Declaration.pptxsrikarna235
 
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top BoutiqueAndrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top BoutiqueSkyLaw Professional Corporation
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
 
如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书
如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书
如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书
 
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in IndiaArbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
 
如何办理提赛德大学毕业证(本硕)Teesside学位证书
如何办理提赛德大学毕业证(本硕)Teesside学位证书如何办理提赛德大学毕业证(本硕)Teesside学位证书
如何办理提赛德大学毕业证(本硕)Teesside学位证书
 
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
 
如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书
 如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书 如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书
 
Key Factors That Influence Property Tax Rates
Key Factors That Influence Property Tax RatesKey Factors That Influence Property Tax Rates
Key Factors That Influence Property Tax Rates
 
Cleades Robinson's Commitment to Service
Cleades Robinson's Commitment to ServiceCleades Robinson's Commitment to Service
Cleades Robinson's Commitment to Service
 
如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书
如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书
如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书
 
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmmEssentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
 
PPT on information technology laws description
PPT on information technology laws descriptionPPT on information technology laws description
PPT on information technology laws description
 
如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书
 
How You Can Get a Turkish Digital Nomad Visa
How You Can Get a Turkish Digital Nomad VisaHow You Can Get a Turkish Digital Nomad Visa
How You Can Get a Turkish Digital Nomad Visa
 
Understanding Social Media Bullying: Legal Implications and Challenges
Understanding Social Media Bullying: Legal Implications and ChallengesUnderstanding Social Media Bullying: Legal Implications and Challenges
Understanding Social Media Bullying: Legal Implications and Challenges
 
如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书
 
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.pptFINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
 
如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书
 如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书 如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书
 
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.pptFINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
 
Test Identification Parade & Dying Declaration.pptx
Test Identification Parade & Dying Declaration.pptxTest Identification Parade & Dying Declaration.pptx
Test Identification Parade & Dying Declaration.pptx
 
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top BoutiqueAndrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
 

Pro se plaintiff, “louis charles hamilton ii”, co plaintiff(s) “united states of america” et al and co-plaintiff “state of texas” et al vs. chief defendant doctor dinesh chandra khare, and geeta international et al

  • 1. In The UnitedStates District Court For The SouthernDistrictof Texas HoustonDivision Louis Charles HamiltonII Pro Se Plaintiff And Co- Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al And Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al Vs. Doctor DineshChandra Khare “Chief Defendant” “Managing Director” “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.” 2194/48-50 Chareonkrung BangkoholamBangkoholam Bangkok 10120 Thailand 94/10 Phet Kasem3 Soi 2, Vs. “GeetaInternational” et al 94/10 Phet Kasem3 Soi 2, Co-Defendant(s) Bang Khae Nuea,
  • 2. Bang Khae, Bangkok 10160, Thailand Vs. “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al 94/10 Phet Kasem3 Soi 2, Co-Defendant(s) Bang Khae Nuea, Bang Khae, Bangkok 10160, Thailand Vs. GEETA Group LLC 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Co-Defendant(s) Conroe, Texas 77304 Vs. VipulKhare 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Co-Defendant(s) Conroe, Texas 77304 Vs. RishuKhare Plk LLC
  • 3. 616 Bourne Ct. Co-Defendant(s) Danville California 94506 Vs. Vijay Khare 616 Bourne Ct. Co-Defendant(s) Danville California 94506 Vs. Trillionaire Assets et al 302 N. Houston#201 Co-Defendant(s) Humble Texas, 77338 Vs. Trillionaire Realty et al 302 N. Houston#201 Co-Defendant(s) Humble Texas, 77338 Vs. Greg Miller 302 N. Houston#201 Co-Defendant(s) Humble Texas, 77338 Ph. (832) 928-8763
  • 4. Civil Complaint Jury Demand Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfiles “Civil Complaint”on behalf of himself in(Person) namely Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfiles on behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of Americaet al” And on behalf of Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas et al” Vs. Doctor DineshChandra Khare, GeetaInternational et al, “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al, “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, GEETA Group LLC et al, Vipul Khare, Greg Miller, TrillionaireRealty et al”, and Trillionaire Assets et al”, withinthe above Honorable U.S. District Court and for Just Cause, Pro Se Plaintiff hereinwill showbefore the “Honorable U.S. District Court””Honorable Justice”Civil Cause of Actions, for Specifically, “International RICO Racket”toDefraud“UnitedStates of America”as a Whole”in Violationof 18 U.S.C. § 371 §371 withall (Defendant(s) and Co-Defendant(s) committedto“Conspiracy tocommit offense or to defraud UnitedStates” Specifically of Title III of the. "USA Patriot Act"In connectionwitha International (RICO) Cartel scheme of things engaging furtherance’s Specifically, violationsof “18 USC § 1343 RICO Wire Fraud”, and Specifically, violationsof RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) “Money laundering” Specifically, violationsof RICO statue “18 USC § 1341 “Mail Fraud”,
  • 5. Specifically, violationsof 18 U.S. Code § 1028A Specifically, violationsof 18 U.S. Code § 1001 Specifically, violationsof“18 USC § 1956 (A) (1) Specifically, violationsof 18 U.S.C. 1028A - Aggravatedidentity theft Specifically Computer Fraudand Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. §1030 Specifically, violationsof DeceptiveTrade Practices Acts, Brought in conjunction with“Common law” Fraud, and “Breachof ConstructionContract” committedagainst namely Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” herein Specifically “Obstructionof Justice”, “Medical Battery”, Battery, “Harassment”, “Public Nuisance”, “Civil Conspirer”, “Intent Gross Negligence”, “Slander”, “Breachof Fiduciary Duty”, “False Promise of Future Performance, Detrimental reliance’s”and “Intentional inflictionof emotional distress Committedby all describedDefendant(s) andCo-Defendant(s) above collectively hereinagainst the ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII, herein his (Person) and against his “Civil Rights”, “Will”, “Peace”and “Dignity”and committedagainst Co- Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co- Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” will showthe “Honorable Justice as follows: I. Parties. Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles HamiltonII, and AfricanAmericanMale, U.S. Navy Veteran, Permanently Disable Veteranprotectedunder: (ADA) American withDisability Act;
  • 6. And alsominorities persons cover under TitleVII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Domiciliary State of Texas, P.O. Box 17524 Sugar Land, Texas 77496 Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, “Managing Director of (Geeta) International CoLtd. Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational”et al and GeetaInternational”Legal Division” et al, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.” Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC. AndCo-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare Business is listedas 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Conroe, Texas 77304 “Geeta”and “International Businessgroupbasedin“Thailand” and Focusedon the retail and consumer packagedgoods segment covering “Thailand” “UnitedStates”and “India”, Co-Defendant(s) Greg Miller of Trillionaire Realty et al and Trillionaire Assets et al of Humble Texas, 77338 II. JurisdictionandVenue This Honorable Court Has Subject Matter Jurisdictionover the Pro Plaintiff Claims brought under Specifically, “International RICO Racket”to Defraud“UnitedStates of America”as a Whole” inViolationof 18 U.S.C. § 371 §371 withall Defendant(s) andCo- Defendant(s) committedto“Conspiracy tocommit offense or to defraudUnited States” inconnectionwith violations Specifically of Title III of the. "USA Patriot Act" Inconnectionwitha International (RICO) Cartel scheme of things engaging furtherance’s Specifically, violationsof “18 USC § 1343 RICO Wire Fraud”, and
  • 7. Specifically, violationsof RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) “Money laundering” Specifically, violationsof RICO statue “18 USC § 1341 “Mail Fraud”, Specifically, violationsof 18 U.S. Code § 1028A Specifically, violationsof 18 U.S. Code § 1001 Specifically, violationsof“18 USC § 1956 (A) (1) Specifically, violationsof 18 U.S.C. 1028A - Aggravatedidentity theft “18 USC § 1343 RICO Wire Fraud”, This Honorable UnitedStates District Federal Court of the UnitedStates of AmericaHas Subject Matter Jurisdictionover the Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare” inthat a “International Diversity of Jurisdiction”exist BetweenProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” herein amount in controversy exceed $75,000.00 U.S. Dollars andChief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, “Managing Director of (Geeta) International CoLtd., Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta International”et al and GeetaInternational”Legal Division” et al, Co- Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC., And Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare are foreignNationals from “Thailand”. Co-Defendant(s) Greg Miller of Trillionaire Realty et al and Trillionaire Assets et al of Humble Texas, 77338 having (American) citizenship established status withinthe State of Texas. (1) Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” “State, Declare andAffirm, before the “Honorable UnitedStates Justice”onbehalf of his (Person)
  • 8. And on Behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co- Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al further “State, Declare andAffirm, Before The “Honorable UnitedStates Justice” Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta International”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, and Co- Defendant Vipul Khare collectively herein (2) Having formulateda “International RICO Enterprise Racket”engaging in among other things “Mutable Counts”of interstate“Mail andWire Fraud”, and “International Mail andWire Fraud” scheme of things tooperate collectively as a “Enterprise Racket”withinthe Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStatesof America”and Co- Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”Jurisdiction, To include but not limitedtoupon further informationprovidedherein and belief such“International RICO EnterpriseRacket”describedfully herein having already beeninstitutedandfully commenced inthe “State of California, “State of Florida” and the “State of NewYork” and the State of Texas , Further ProSe Plaintiff respectfully Assert, declareandconfirmbefore the Honorable U.S. Justice inthat the Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, hereinhaving “Legal Property Holdings andBanking accounts within both “State of Californiaand the “State of NewYork” describedas follows: A. Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” Californiadriver records maintainan address as listed616 Bourne Ct Danville CA 94506 withCell-Ph. (936) 900-7650 B. Further Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, herein maintain an address as listed156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 C. As Identifiedona Fraud (RICO) Check Scheme of things to advance said Fraud against the Pro Se Plaintiff hereinwiththe financial usage institutionof the “CitiBank N.A. BR. #128 37-57 74th streetJackson
  • 9. Heights, NY 11372andsame scheme of things with“CitiBank”branch in The San FranciscoBay Area“California (3) Pro Se Plaintiff further respectfully Assert, declare andconfirmbefore the Honorable U.S. Justice Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” Co- Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, “Geeta International Co. Ltd.”, and Co-Defendant Vipul Khare collectively herein formulatedsaid “International RICO EnterpriseRacket”engaging inamong other things “Mutable Counts”of interstate“Mail andWire Fraud”, and “International Mail and Wire Fraud” scheme of things tooperate collectively as a“Enterprise Racket”as well withinthe “State of California, Texas, Florida, and the “State of New York” as all being legally describedof sucha International and Interstate (RICO) Mail and Wire Fraud” scheme of things. (4) Further Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, and Co-Defendant Vipul Khare collectively hereinhaving further formulatedsaid“International RICO EnterpriseRacket”toengaging inamong other scheme of things: 1. Conspirer tocommit structuring andmoney laundering “18 USC § 371 2. Money laundering by concealment “18 USC § 1956 (A) (1) 3. “Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud Co-Plaintiff United States”et al in violationof 18 U.S.C. § 371 §371 4. “Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al in violationof 18 U.S.C. § 371 §371 5. Conspirer tocommit cyber Identity theft Fraudand relatedactivity in connectionwithidentificationdocuments, authenticationfeatures,
  • 10. and information in violationof 18 U.S. Code § 1028 inconnectionand concert with(RICO) “International Wire fraud” 6. Conspirer tocommit false statements, concealment against the civil rights peace and dignity of ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” in violationof 18 U.S. Code § 1001 7. Conspirer tocommit false statements, concealment against the Co- Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”et al in violationof 18 U.S. Code § 1001 8. Conspirer tocommit false statements, concealment against the Co- Plaintiff “State of Texas” et al in violationof 18 U.S. Code § 1001 9. Conspirer tocommit “Tax Evasion”on both Federal and State level 10.Aggravatedidentity theft(Physically) committedagainst the ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” Identity, Social Security Number and Signatures by means of “Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al, “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, and Co-Defendant Vipul Khare collectively hereinhaving illegally gainsuchpossessionof ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” Identity, Social Security Number and Signatures by means of “Interstate wire andInternational wire”, fraud direct against ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII”in violationof 18 U.S. Code § 1028A – in connectionwith interstate “Wire Fraud”, and “International Wire Fraud”“International RICO Enterprise Racket”scheme of things. 11.Conspirer tocommit Aggravatedcyber identity theftagainst other similarly the same having “public business dealing”with GEETA Group LLC et al, “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, Vipul Khare, and the direct usage of all business records, involving withCo-Defendant(s) GEETA Group LLC et al, in a “International andInterstate (RICO) Wire Fraud Scheme of things such(records, documents andpersonal information) forwarding to “GeetaInternational”et al, “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”,and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al, having derive first inthe possession, custody andcontrol of by Chief
  • 11. Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” and Co-Defendant “Vipul Khare”. AndCo-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al locatedat 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Conroe, Texas 77304, 12.Having (Already) conspirer toformulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket”engaging in a well-establishedserviceof “International Lawyers”tocommit to Conspirer tocommit Aggravated cyber illegal transactions of ProSe Plaintiff business records, personal information, social security number and“Signatures”toThird world Countries namely “Thailand and India” among other “International Community” for exploitationby way “International cyber Identity Theft as well as “Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co- Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta International Legal Division”et al, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, and Co-Defendant Vipul Khare collectively hereinhaving legal standing, past, present andfuture possession, custody andcontrol to commit toConspirer tocommit Aggravatedcyber identity theft against all similarly the same 13.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket” engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to facilitate illegal transactions inviolations onCo-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of Americaand Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”Federal andState Laws. 14.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket” engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to facilitates illegal transactions inviolations of ProSe Plaintiff Civil Rights as a (American) Citizenandother similarly the same 15.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket” engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to facilitates andregulate said(RICO) scheme of things to control over Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”namely “InterstateCommerce” in the NewHome Construction“Independent Contractor Labor prices and wages and materials pricing control “scheme of things” 16. Having formulatedsaid“International RICO EnterpriseRacket” engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to
  • 12. fully eliminate, facilitates, committedto“Obstructionof Justice”to regulate bothCo-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”andCo- Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”Federal andState “Judicial Branch of Government”against the ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinand other similarly the same inconnectiontofurtherance said “International RICO EnterpriseRacket”withinthe Co-Plaintiff “United States of America” and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas” Jurisdiction 17.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket” engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to fully eliminate, facilitates, andregulate bothCo-Plaintiff “United States of Americaand Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”Federal andState “Judicial Branch of Government”“Due Process clause”of The AmericanConstitutionof the Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America” and fully eliminate, facilitates, andregulate “Due Process clause”of the “State of Texas”Constitutionof the Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” against the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinand other similarly the same inconnectionto furtherance said“International RICO Enterprise Racket”withinthe Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”Jurisdiction 18.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket” engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to fully eliminate, facilitates, andregulate bothCo-Plaintiff “United States of Americaand Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”Federal andState “Judicial Branch of Government”“Equal Protectionof the Law clause” of The AmericanConstitutionof the Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”and fully eliminate, facilitates, andregulate “Equal Protectionof the Law clause”of the “State of Texas”Constitutionof the Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”against the ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinand others similarly the same inconnection to furtherance said“International RICO EnterpriseRacket”withinthe Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”andCo-Plaintiff “State of Texas”Jurisdiction.
  • 13. 19.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket” engaging in a well-establishedservice of “International Lawyers”to “Exploit”Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof Americaet al” and Co- Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas et al” lack thereof of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;and (ADA) AmericanwithDisability Act;full protectionof Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles HamiltonII, and African AmericanMale, U.S. Navy Veteran, Permanently Disable Veteran protectedunder:(ADA) AmericanwithDisability Act;andalso minorities personscover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Domiciliary State of Texas, P.O. Box 17524 Sugar Land, Texas 77496 *A “Independent ConstructionContractor whichChief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al and Co-Defendant Greg Millerof Trillionaire Realty et al”having fully engage in suchhostile Discriminationpatternandpractices in conjunctionwith “Medical Battery”, “Harassment”, and“Public Nuisance”, tofurther provide advancement thereof andprotection thereof said“International RICO Enterprise Racket”inconcert, collusionwithall said describedDefendant(s) andCo-Defendant(s) collectively hereinagainst ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” others similarly the same. 20.Having formulatedsaid“International RICO Enterprise Racket cartel” engaging specifically inconspirer against TitleIII of the "USA Patriot Act". (5) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII herein“Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” ProSe Plaintiff on his (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al in that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinbeing first and foremost “front man” on behalf of all describedCo-Defendant(s) collectively herein
  • 14. Betweenthe exact dates of June 25th 2015 andJuly 6th 7:20 pm 2015 Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” first approached(Pro Se Plaintiff) hereinon behalf of himself and all the describedCo-Defendant(s) inparagraph (1-4) above collectively hereinina half bake (RICO) combine “international greedy racket enterprise” inassociationwith Violations of “18 USC § 1343 Wire Fraud”, Interstate andInternational “scheme of things”having accumulatedgradually past acquisitionof a simple “Fraud and Breachof ConstructionContract”incommon law withinthe Co- Plaintiff “State of Texas” Jurisdictioninthat “ (6) Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfurtherance’s“Declare”, “State”, and “Affirm”before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff hereinon his (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “United States of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al in that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta International”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al, “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, and Co- Defendant Vipul Khare After sometime their after the meeting of the “Minds”of said “International Racket cartel”Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational”et al, Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta International Legal Division”et al, “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC et al, and Co-Defendant Vipul Khare collectively hereinhaving further formulatedsaid “International RICO EnterpriseRacket”toengaging andconspire inamong other a “scheme of things”as describedinParagraph(4) 1-20 above, to Furtherance’s exactly onor about the 12th day of June 2015 as described by the Co-Plaintiff (State of Texas) Secretary for the “State of Texas”createdan empty shell company as follows:
  • 15. *“GEETA GROUP LLC, FILE DATE 06/12/2015, FILING TYPE“CORPORATE”, REGISTRATED AGENT“VIPUL KHARE” 1600 RIVER POINTEDR. APT 812, CONROE, TEXAS 77304, MONTGOMERY COUNTY* (7) Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfurtherance’s“Declare”, “State”, and “Affirm”before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff hereinon (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al In that on or about the same 12th day of June 2015 GeetaGroupLLC being a said “Empty LLC Shell corporations”operating withinthe Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”Jurisdictionnamely Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta Group LLC”hereinwas formedhaving a name similar toexisting name of that Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaGroup International et al”base at 94/10 Phet Kasem3 Soi 2, Bang Khae Nuea, Bang Khae, Bangkok 10160, Thailandand Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational et al”(IP) International Email address being geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; Physically the “exact same” email address for Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaLLC” being 1 of 5 Business listedat 1600 River PointeDr. Apt. 812, Conroe, Texas 77304 WithCo-Defendant(s) “GeetaGroup LLC”operating withinthe Jurisdiction of the Co-Defendant(s) “State of Texas”being 1 of 5 Business listedas 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Conroe, Texas 77304 (Legal) Business address for Co- Defendant(s) “Geeta GroupLLC”herein. (8) Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfurtherance’s“Declare”, “State”, and “Affirm”before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff hereinon (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al
  • 16. That “However”Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, on July 8th , 9th , 12th , 17th , 26th , and August 7th and 23rd in the year 2015 reasonably foreseeable knewthat interstate wire communicationswouldbe used;and “interstatewire communications”were infact used… As describedinparagraph(9) belowto further this fraudulent international (RICO) wire fraud“scheme of things” describedhereininaddition to the numerous cell Phone call and (IM) instant messages”involved notwithstanding U.S. Mail, (9) (July 8th 2015) Dear Louis Itwas nice wemet and discussed possiblebusiness. I amstudying your proposal to constructcomplete houseof 1842 sqftof living area @$48/sqft. As discussed I am attaching the softcopy of full plan set. This plan has not yet been submitted to HOA and may vary slightly but basis will remain unchanged. Kindly send me your address wherewecan meet next time when I come to south. you can contact me at contacts given below Regards Dr. Khare Disclaimer: The study is with outa commitmentfrom either side and will become a commitmentonly after contractis committed (July 8th 2015) hi you can meet me on job locations any time you call, I moving now as we are build on 40 lots, and camping out to becauseof different job locations on the outside of Houston area, fromLa Port- to Humble ..........I looking forward to your project and consider renting in this location while projectbe fixed, the Lake so nice to jet skion :) your project at $48 per sq. ft. for total of $88,416 is
  • 17. good...butwilling to reduce to $46 per sq. ft on condition of starting the other projectfoundations after another to speed up the build process for the next two years of home construction.... and my goal is simple...to marry "MischellManeja" fromthe Philippines as I show you her picture, I have everything I need in the United States, good skills, smart company, and good family backing.... my goal is her being my future wife, secured and happy so for her Love, (I) reduced my price to $46 dollars per sq. ft. = $84,732 for thatproject and each and every one thereafter at $46 dollars complete building project:) (Louis) (July 8th 2015) Thank you Louis. I appreciate your gesturein love for your Mischell. We shall let you know. Haveyou worked with post tension foundations. Understand this is posttension type foundation. We aretaking up with HOA & preparing paper work Regards Dr. Khare GEETA Group LLC E-mail: geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; dckhare@gmail.com Tel: 9369007650 (July 8th 2015) GEETA Group LLC E-mail: geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; dckhare@gmail.com. Tel: 9369007650 Hi Louis Kindly find attached the draft agreement that will be required once we go ahead of with the project. Kindly review and advisecomments, if any. Justto informyou,
  • 18. design engineer could not complete the drawing work today. so could not go to HOA. Regards Dr. Khare Disclaimer:Thismail is just for reference and thereis no commitment till the agreement is signed (July 8th 2015) Thanks On Jul 8, 2015 9:21 PM, bluefinlch2@gmail.com wrote: Yes.....ihave18 men crew ready juston foundation alone....any kind of foundations.post.or beam.. plus.pier placements if needed....my framing crew is 16 men crew if needed....as i can build all 5 homes under 2 years...to almost18 MONTHS...completed.... thanks for ya warmwishes...and was niceLunch :-) (July 9th 2015) (I) already been doing commercial concrete at De Chavez Construction Co @ Bluejack National is a world-class privategolf club and community located in historic Montgomery County near Houston. Comprised of 755 acres of rolling hills and beautifully wooded countryside, Bluejack National provides the perfect setting for a truly unique golf experience in the Texas market. as seen http://houston.craigslist.org/sks/5073027272.html (Roads) to be exact :) to include http://houston.craigslist.org/sks/5053427519.html this account has custom framing work on a large scale over 12,500 sq. ft. Home plus foundation all dry in for $35.00 per sq. ft. as you see me in the photo's http://houston.craigslist.org/sks/5045456672.html
  • 19. OK my company offer to you is $46.00 dollars entireprojectincluding the same price for all 5 homes you required built , that will secure me being free from looking for work for a shortbit I been giving this some study, and whatmakes wantthis is simple as I stated "Mischell", i ready for a real wife :) :) and family again...xoxoxoxo plus all of The Lakes in the Area, and I am consider moving to "Montgomery Texas (USA) and build my home on lake front, as this is better then living out on 40 lot's in the middle of know where.....but there (I) can haveplus a boat dock as D.C.Khare... .I am a Navy Vet actually secrete (Commander) as seen on my Google Profile https://plus.google.com/photos/109749112725064370937/albums/59009693891 62880081 Louis Charles Hamilton a/k/a "Cmdr. Bluefin (United States Navy Seal) :) :) :) must dash off to work, took the time to give you our Company profile.....you have some of my construction profile and Navy Profile and my continue wishes we doing business, I havethe entire Construction team in place, VIP and ready :) thanks for such a sweet offer and hope we can work together (Louis) ....xoxoxoox (I) looking forward to Retire soon with nice Future :) (July 9th 2015) Thank you Louis. Do you havea crew for land clearing... We have to clear land before we can start work. You said you can organizeland clearing., though not included in your scope. Kindly advise (July 9th 2015)
  • 20. Yes.....that.s easy...and iwas with my chief construction engineer and explain your entire raw layout....and knowing wecan include land clearing.....justneeding to put each location to. a price.....itnot a issue....and already havetrucks and equipment in place.....as ya seeing in attached photo's .....ishall send ya pictures from.my other cell as thid Tree cutting job was done in fact Montgomery Texas.....this land clearing phase.....can bedone under me....again. :-) (July 12th 2015) D. C. Khare for your request here is my information as follows: 1. for the especially the hard liners at the HOA and Insuranceneeds and Banking needs (Please) use "Bustos Framing" , Alejandro Bustons" 27151Hilland Dale Acres Spelndora Texas 77372 they ask for Charles if needed (832-344-7134) Infiniti InsuranceServices 2129 FM2920 Rd. ste,. 220, Spring Texas 77388 #ARKGC42011 "ThePolicy" 2. For agreed contract between D.C. Khareet al and Me...... "Louis Hamilton" mailing address is P.O. Box 17524 Sugar Land Texas 77496-7524 HomeAddress is 6403 Miners Bend Lane Richmond Texas 77469 but will discuss in person paymentand detail plan at later date in a agreed detail construction contract it is bestthat for 100% secured with the HOA in Montgomery Texas, and your banking needs that I used the framing company , profile so you face no reject or delays, as described aboveto include I have two different construction "Hispanic primary crew" thathas no need to be involved in this process to include our professional"Bustos Framing" company record will with stand checks in the build industry becauseof the volume of high dollar end homes built and good community standings...... as agreed I shallmaintaining and progress your entireconstruction project(s) fromclearing the land to the foundation, framing, and entire full complete
  • 21. packagefinished homes to include landscaping details within reason.... our crew is ready, and you have the lay out of your request (Thanks) (Louis) (July 12th 2015) These are the latest pic from the recent Job you saw.... (July 17th 2015) D.C. Khare, Here is pictures posting up date from the Home Project as posted on "Craiglslist" (Louis) http://houston.craigslist.org/sks/5126957218.html (July 17th 2015) Thanks Louis. I havegone California on three days holiday. Shall speak to you on return Monday or Tuesday Sent frommy iPhone (July 17th 2015) Have safetrip :-) (July 20th 2015) Good Morning....ihavenow work my self out of employment....Today.as my curruentwork load ended this Sunday...which icompleted the small garage roofing, lighting. and painting, clean up..there after already framing & concrete..in hopes of starting as fresh off for new construction employment....this early in the week.....wishing to hear back from you when your free...on your plans...for new construction.....Louis.....haveno new projects...as of yet.....hoping wecan finished your proposal...........thanks.. (July 26th 2015)
  • 22. here is the Concrete ProjectYou visited Today Pictures Posted, (Online) justclick the link....... :) Louis http://houston.craigslist.org/sks/5095789619.html (July 26th 2015) Dear Louis Waiting for details of your subcontractor for Foundation FrameWork Sheathing & Sheetrock Plumber Electrical Carpenter Any other We Would like name & contact details of these people. We would also like to have your ID card detail & adress to put in contract. As promised attach kindly find break up of drawdown ateach stage. Kindly advise the changes in list if any. (July 27th 2015) here is my info.....Louis Charles Hamilton II is my legal name (SS #) is 467-35- ****, home address is 6403 Miners Bend Ct Richmond Texas 77469, (Mailing address) is P.O. Box 17524 Sugar Land Texas 77496 832-894-9465 (Cell), 713,497-7924, and 832,344-7134 Alex- Framer- 281-467-6656 Ray-Concrete-713-539-8577 Melvin-Plumber-713-534-2368
  • 23. Carlos -Electrical-832-707-6180 as for your proposalpaymentplan I need to look at it closer as I been studying it with the Blueprints".. will submitmy requestchanges tonight (Louis) thanks............. (August 7th 2015) Hi Louis Kindly find attached the draft agreement that will be required once we go ahead of with the project. Kindly review and advisecomments, if any. Justto informyou, design engineer could not complete the drawing work today. so could not go to HOA. Regards Dr. Khare Disclaimer:Thismail is just for reference and thereis no commitment till the agreement is signed GEETA Group LLC E-mail: geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; dckhare@gmail.com Tel: 9369007650 (August 10th 2015) D.C. Khare...thefollowing changes need to be corrected as i forward. attachment... the first draw...is actually $1693 vs. $1000 as outline in the contract. vs. payment plan layout you supplied herein...second the additional $600.00 additional adjustmentyou agreed upon to cover the real diffucultcost of hauling off on cleary this property has not been added to this contract..$84,640,,,,which should refectactually $85,240...other wise...your contract with the exeception as described aboved of me siging it...i am in full agreement after said corrections.... Been made....and my sub,s contractors
  • 24. looking for new blueprints..updates..asap..Thanks...in other news Doctor as i explain me desire for such a contract is .. .I havemy baby..MischellPassportcompleted in the philippines...it will released September 15., as i am working for both her and our future...together....these construction projectwill secureour plans....Thanks...Louis" (August 23rd 2015) GEETA Group LLC E-mail: geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; dckhare@gmail.com Tel: 9369007650 Mr Louis We are not sureif you can clear the lot & cut the tree out professionally. In view before we agree & permit you to clear the lot we would like to have at least three references where you have cut the tree and cleared the lot. Kindly provide references urgently to evaluate. Regards Dr. Khare GEETA Group LLC E-mail: geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; dckhare@gmail.co Tel: 9369007650 (August 24th 2015) Doc....whileyou concern about the trees...i havebeen with Energy...and Foundation...plus Framing.....you need 70-75 yards of concrete....as for electrical....you may be delay...by 1-2 months in having electrical installed.for this backwayards designed project.
  • 25. .as My Electrical having now secured a date detail today justfor the high tech engeener from Entergy to described their plans to physically putin power on that entire end of the lots. ...as for the trees...i not going to get into a fuss.....when your budgetof $850 for this is not whats needed for a professional.to do the trees as you saying..plus..a out doors toilet...plus insurances...plus...clear thelot and haul all of this away on same $850 budget. .when next your draw plan for foundation...cause for 70-80 yards of concreteat a cost of $100- $120 a yard = aprox$9600 justin Concrete material alone for this job.. .this do not countfor rebar..postwire..wooden forms...and largeLabor...crew needed to providefull complete foundation.. ,.when you have a payment plan that will not even cover the simple payment of the concrete foundation...materials let alone the labor. ..they will not work for free.ok... .as for electrical...you wanted this in your duties...iagree...butyou knew...this is a enourmus ordeal....as ispent all day. with each chief staff member ...framing..electrical...and concrete..on each of their professionaljob locations...putting your project...to the correctcalulations needed in materials alone ...as your plan do not even cover release of funds to effect a building of a foundation..in a proper manner.ok.to include a dumpster as required on the Job site justto clear the property...what...used thetrees as toilet...? ..as for the clearing of the land....call whomever....itrying to salvagea contract designed for failure...under my name. ...which...if you did as i was saying at first..with proper budget then a dumb $850...to effectall as described herein...heavy equipment...and man power...gas and travel for a week..on..$859 i can have manage more personalman power...to effectall of the above..butwith what....$850
  • 26. ,do not even cover a weeks labor for 1 labor...letalone heavy equipment...tree cutting ..hauling..heavy equipment.boxblade to cutt back the soil...and bobcat to move all of this earth and Debrys...and my fee.....whats leftfor me on...$850....ok.iwork for free....? ,,So we all agree...you need to rethink...your building project....stop holding back on money...as my team dont work for free...and spent..many man hours today as a favor to me to figure whatis really wrong on Nottingham Ln. ok ...realsimple...whomever designed that pay plan lost in reality of construction in 2015 .. we do not even have cost to cover...thepermit for electrical....while...you Doc.... i figure assumei am Nego...i dont know no better in these construction facts...? well i enclosed ..frommoreprofessionallarger construction job site.today..my mexican construction team photos of today jobs.being included and ...10 xthe sizeof your simple job... .they will not work for free...or in any formslow or stupid...ok,,,,,,neither ami. Doc....ok... .whomever got this twisted ...talk with them and yourself....thetrees...and lot clearing sub it out...i do not care ...i am tired...ready to build a home...and the man power is ready too...to work for you today... and i broughtboth teams lunch...getting your job layed out. and secured Enegery tech.to get every thing offically correct instead of being blind as your missing a lot of facts...especially...i. foundation..and electrical.and starting budget ..Louis...iwill not proceed until advised...butwill continue collect correctdata for my interest.hopewe dont have any formal complications...tired of legal and Court drama you...simply.going.off...and chocking your job...being cheap...!.
  • 27. .please dont belittle me...and my professionalteamwith your ceap budget plan..crap..and whats needed to really clear this land in once again..being cheap...witholding operational funds until after the fact .and dontbelittle me and my construction team abilities to get this done....we have everything you need...but not sufficentdeposited on starting such a small job... Louis...and takenote...they all working currenton jobs...10xyour simple home... Da (August 26th 2015) We spoken last night....as i trying to explain...what is correct...for this Job...as required....by Law....ok....and ihaveno roomfor mistakes.., and wrong handling of the $85,000 .Projectbudget....being with held and controled by you...(Doctor) You paid out $850. and this was design by you to clear the land. , cutting of trees., haul away all of this debry.. pay labor. that do not include me being paid ...when i Louis Charles Hamilton II sign a contract which also required..i .purchase.of a porta potty on site restroom...costfor 1stmonth $164.99...store temporary electrical power....which iput up $500. DEPOSIT...with electrican from the original $850. to get this electrical process started...and having now a electrical account set up at Enegery #4320314Skew #107 and buy a $200 chain saw...leaving $150. to continue on ward fromthe date i sign said contract...on a operational limit of $150 ,,notwithstanding gas for transportation back and forth fromHouston Texas to Montgomery. Texas to the physicalJob site to include the builders Rick Insurancepolicy....$720.00 for sixmonths you wanting on this Job site....for all in the origanaldraw of a simple $850. U.S dollars.. when all construction contractors reciving no less then 13 down on a project that required labor and materials which you should havehanded over...a minum of $28,300. US dollars.. .which would cover the electrical deposit of $5500. down for theelectrican and his crew....to installtemporary power..do under ground digging.., get account set up with Enegery...havea tech fromEnegery install a transformer...so thejob site alone having power as required by same contract you designed....for a simple $850
  • 28. when i am paying out already $500 in deposit for electrical. from your Cheap $850.and $50 for 1 day labor.... and buy a $200 chain saw ...leaving $100.00 U.S. dollars to cut down all the required trees and hauled away all debry with a dumpster at a normalcost..no less than $1500. US. dollars... plus normal costof $600.00 U.S. dollars to havea box blade scrapeback all the soild on this lot...to be ready for grading for concrete foundation. forming which you do even not know whatthe hell a box blade is or how it even work as the date was set for this Sunday.. .but belittle me as in now wanting 3 refferances to clear this lot...for now your ungodly in the United States of America $850. cheap startup budget of a remaining. Sumof $150 U.S. dollars ..to include with the sameremain $150.00 U.S.dollarscutdown all the tress. haul away all debrys...haveinsurance...storeelectrical power...buy porta potty..and rental of a box blade...to include pay labors to performed the task at hand. of building a $85,000 homeon a start up.money out line of ... a crapy cheap $850.budget.. now the electrical calling cus he has a date with engery....and dontwork for free....as i attached his messageto which he needs deposittoday...for $5000. as i agreed in sign contractto even haveelectrical phasestarted with the job site and entergy...plus pullpermits....and already gave him $500 fromyour cheap budget....theaccount number is temporary set up in builders name which is me....#4320314 Sku #107 as you now ready to complicate matter morewith Engery in a silly inquiry ...which you hire me to achive this...now asking why it not in your name...atEnegery.....to include ready to belittle me more about the Risk insurancefor the Job.site being endorsein your name.... when in fact it is being broughtfor your simple job under builders name which once again in me....and the costof this $720. 00 U.S. dollars...butyou only providing $850....to startthis job....which requires... @ a whole lot more then $850 which doinot even cover the electrical staff wages...which you metat your property working for me... nor cover insurances...porta potty.., boxblade...cuttting trees down...hauling away all debrys...,my labor staff weekly wages...as wellas me tbe builder having funds in tbis same startup cheap crap of $850
  • 29. i agreed to do this home for you and because of the sizeof your project...could not take on any other employment...which i lost...two contracts 1. for $14,800.00 and 1.$2500.00 to accomnidate you. and now broketurning down work...to build your home...to be free to complete it in 120 as the contract required. .buti in delays by your cheap $850 budget....treating melike somebrokestreet trash negro..instead of a contractor....!!!which you came to my physicaljob sites to inspect said projects...beforeyou even decided to award me this $85,000 contract...ok. thosetwo project put up 1/3 deposit on tbe entire projects...and it was staff with over 12 men which we completed that. two jobs in under 10 days ..Yet i give up $16,200in work orders to startbuild this home and 4 other back to back..and on a funky startup budget which was $1680 and you reduced that to nothing but $850.00. to do all as required as stated here in ..and i can not even have a normaloperational strating fee...or havethe electrical staff paid proper which they alread commence work on your property....and now you ready to have ne work brokefurther....and you Doctor forcing now your very on cheap breach of construction contract.. to include..even piss off..theteam of builders .trying to work for you...and you dont even respect...thatmoney needing to be released fast....withoutdelay and hassel...and your confused complications...in whats proper to startbuilding a home....ineed this corrected to be expidted fast. ...Enegery is soon on the way and you will have my Electrical staff quitting before i can even have power broughtby Enegery...let alone the Box blade....porta potty...risk insurance....dumpster to clear this site...and or dump trucks...and tree cutting.....this messagehas been forward to my Attorney...and staff at De Chavez Construction.for records..keeping..if wehaving problems...ipaying out of my own pocket to continue for a week. .becauseyour cheap budget of $850 is burnt up....too kow to even startbuild a out housetoilet.. let alone...$85,000New Home Construction project....ok...this is almost2016 gas it at $2.35- $2.25 a gallon...pricerange....this is not a way to manage build a new home on any level....and ..i need to meet with you asap..liketoday..and get the proper funds to do this job..reimburstback my $500 depositfor ekectrical.withoutbeing held back...and at a state of being poor caused by you...being selfish., and cheap...to take on the
  • 30. task of building this new home under contract with me... Louis Charles Hamilton II. Doctor...you havenoteven provided me with a copy of rhe contract and all documents you had me signed at the contact signing day...a week ago....ok....and you question me....? (August 26th 2015) Gregory Miller <greg_miller_realtor@outlook.com> Aug 26 to me Hi Louis, To make surewe move as fast as possibleand payment be made on time, could you send paymentschedules as soon as convenient? Dr Kharewants it to be reviewed. Also, Dr Khare was taking care of methods of payment and perhaps looking to open up a chaseliquid card. If need any help or have any questions let me know available anytime. Sincerely, Greg Ps: sorry aboutthis, is your name louis or Lewis ? Sent from my iPhone (August 26th 2015)
  • 31. Louis Hamilton <bluefinlch2@gmail.com> Aug 26 to Gregory Louis..and thanks...itbedone asap.....could notcash that check...his bank been closed...itin New Jersey...timeZone...pks. adviseDoc heneed to clear this in moring when i try again......also...theporta potty....need to be finished which they have night servicefor this....ireally dont care who.namego.on a toilet contract...ok...wejustneeds this done....asap.... (10) Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfurtherance’s“Declare”, “State”, and “Affirm”before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff hereinon (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al Not Just any “Interstate wirecommunication”via the “Internet” was being usedon July 8th , 9th , 12th , 17th , 26th , and August 7th and 23rd in the year 2015 inthat Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinwas providing “among other things”ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII”Construction business details, personal informationandU.S. Citizenship“Social security number” and signature inthis International (RICO) Wire FraudScheme of Things in direct concert, collusionwithCo-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC. Business listedat 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Conroe, Texas 77304 via “International Wire Services”toCo-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Group ” Namely Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational et al”and Co- Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Legal Division”et al, “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, from the (IP) email address listedoneachemail sent toPro Se Plaintiff
  • 32. hereinas describedinparagraph (9) belowclearly showing Co-Defendant(s) GEETA Group LLC. (IP) * E-mail: geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; address listedin“Thailand”while physically Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC. Business is listedas 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, Conroe, Texas 77304 withinthe Jurisdictionof Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” (12) Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfurtherance’s“Declare”, “State”, and “Affirm”before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff hereinon (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al In that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinonJuly 8th , 9th , 12th , 17th , 26th , and August 7th and 23rd in the year 2015 1. Did infacts and legal terms refer tohimself as “Regards Dr. Khare” on July 8th , 9th , 12th , 17th , 26th , and August 7th and 23rd in the year 2015 2. Did infacts and legal terms refer to“We”as a group when sending all terms and conditions of the ConstructionContract inall “International wire communication”and “interstate wire communications” as describedinparagraph(9) above clearly showing 3. Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC Business addresslistedas 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812,Conroe, Texas 77304as describedby the Secretary for the “State of Texas” 4. “GEETA GROUP LLC, FILE DATE 06/12/2015, FILING TYPE “CORPORATE”, REGISTRATED AGENT“VIPUL KHARE” 1600 RIVER POINTEDR. APT 812, CONROE, TEXAS 77304, MONTGOMERYCOUNTY. 5. Texas Business Registrationrecord“GEETA GroupLLC” Business address listedas 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812,Conroe, Texas 77304 as 1 of 5 Business listedas 1600 RiverPointe Dr. Apt. 812,Conroe, Texas 77304
  • 33. 6. Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC locatedat 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812,Conroe, Texas 77304 andCo-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational et al” locatedat 94/10 Phet Kasem3 Soi 2, Bang Khae Nuea, Bang Khae, Bangkok 10160, Thailandbothhaving the same “International Email address namely geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; (13) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII herein“Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” ProSe Plaintiff on his (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al states, declare andAffirm In that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinonthe exact dates of February 22nd 2008 petitionfor and receivedaDMVCalifornia Driver License #E2336392, having already inplacement asaving and checking Banking account with“Citibank”San FranciscoBay area Branchwithhome address (Identified) as 616 Bourne Ct. Danville California94506 (14) Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles HamiltonII Co-Plaintiff(s) United States of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al herein“Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”that on or about in the year of 1995 Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al andCo-Defendant(s) “Geeta International “Legal Division”et al”was incorporated. “Geeta”and “International Businessgroupbasedin“Thailand and Focusedon the retail and consumer packagedgoods segment covering “Thailand”, Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”and“India”. Withcorporate matters listing as describedinparagraph(14) below (15) Corporate Matters
  • 34. GEETA brandedWholesale DistributionandInternational Trading 2194/48-49 Bang Koh Laem, Bangkok - 10120 Thailand Tel: (+662) 291-1968 Fax: (+662) 688-1146 Email: contact@geetaint.com GeetaFoods - California, USA Satellite Office Danville, CA 94506 Tel: +1-925-282-3482 Fax: +1-682-292-2887 Email: info-feedback@geetaint.com GeetaFoods - NewYork, USA SatelliteOffice Jackson Heights, NY Tel: +1-917-573-1923 Fax: +1-413-581-7495 Email: info@geetaint.com Retail Supermarkets Value Mart Co Ltd. Soi 20 Central Sukhumvit Bangkok, Thailand Tel: (+662) 261-5955 Fax: (+662) 261-5859 Email: info@geetaint.com Restaurants: Soi 12, SukhumvitRoad, Bangkok, Thailand Tel: (+662) 653-1171 Tel: (+662) 653-1173 Fax: (+662) 663-3721 Email: info@geetaint.com Home Delivery: Tel: (+662) 291-1968 Email: info@geetaint.com
  • 35. (16) Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates of America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein“Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” In that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinht. 5ft. 5” wt. 160 (Lbs) eyes (Black) borninthe 1940’s January 31st as so claimedwith DMVfor State of Californiawiththe usage of the “Title” Dr. Khare Did inall factual circumstance andevents withinthe Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”Jurisdiction, Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, PurchasedLot 6621 know tobe (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 andin 1998 built 3460 sq. ft. NewConstructionsingle family home having 4 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms which was last soldfor $1,075,000.00 (17) Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles Hamilton II”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates of America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein“Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” In that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, on the exact date of “August 22nd 2015 issuedaPersonal check toPro se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereininthe Amount in excess of $1,350.00 U.S. Dollars and in the present of the “Citibank” inMontgomery County Conroe Texas Branch Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, further withdrewvia live banking (Teller) (ATM) account withdrawal inthe amount inexcess of $500.00 U.S. Dollars making first install payment toProSe Plaintiff for New Constructionas agreedupon in signcontract as detail in Co-Defendant(s) Geeta Group LLC (Agreement) withChief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, fully the front man. (18) Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates of America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein“Declare”, State,
  • 36. and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”the Check was process at PLS Check Cashers 5823 Gulf Freeway HoustonTexas 77023viatheir “Wire Services” on behalf of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII herein Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, “Declare”, State, andAffirm before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”under any circumstances would Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinallow PLS Check Cashers 5823 Gulf Freeway HoustonTexas 77023 viatheir “Wire Services”tocashsuch Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, personal check which PLS Check Cashers first rancheck through their electronic checking devise, Secondly “PLS Check Cashers”called “Citibank”inthe presence of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereintoverify Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, hereinfully having sucha “Live”account with “Citibank”as this was verifiedtobe true “However” “PLS Check Cashers”needed Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, to verify his last (4) digits of his social security number viathe “PLS Check Cashers”phone line in order to further proceeding incashing said check drawn in the amount of $1, 350.00 U.S. Dollars. (19) Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates of America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein“Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice”the Check of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, that was (legally) process at PLS Check Cashers 5823 Gulf Freeway HoustonTexas 77023 viatheir “Wire Services”onbehalf of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII herein a. Said Personal check of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, hereinissuedfrom“Citibank”was Drawn on the exact same address of (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 toahome which was sold on January 2006 for $1,075,000.00 but saidcheck for “Constructionservices”was made out on August 22nd 2015.. To ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII…herein..? b. Said check was made out from a sold resident said Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, herein“assuming” having no (legal) control over in2015… since saidproperty
  • 37. namely “Material facts”supporting that (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 was soldinJanuary 2006 for $1,075,000.00 c. The exact address of (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 is listed on Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, hereinDMV CaliforniaDriver License #E2336392, d. Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al andCo-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al collectively having placement of GeetaFoods - California, USA (Secrete) Satellite Office located in namely “Danville, CA 94506” Tel: +1-925-282- 3482 Fax: +1-682-292-2887 Email: info feedback@geetaint.com e. ” Tel: +1-925-282-3482 is a none working number while being currently advertised on the internet as Co-Defendant(s) Geeta Foods - California, USA SatelliteOffice. f. In January 2006 for $1,075,000.00 Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, hereinDMVCaliforniaDriver License #E2336392 having inexcess of $1,075,000.00U.S. Dollars in “Citibank”under account for the address of (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 whichChief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare” continue writing checks drawntosaid sold property locatedat (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 in(2015) g. DMVCaliforniaDriver License #E2336392 filedas ProSe Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStatesof America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein exhibit (A) insupport of this complaint made hereinshowing address (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506whichChief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” continue writing checks drawn tosaid “soldproperty”locatedat (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 in(2015)..? (20) Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates of America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein“Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” In that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinht. 5ft. 5” wt. 160 (Lbs) eyes (Black) borninthe 1940’s January 31st as so claimedwith DMVfor State of Californiawiththe usage of the “Title” Dr. Khare
  • 38. Did inall factual circumstance andevents withinthe Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”Jurisdiction, Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, in the same patternand practice describedinparagraph(17,18, and 19) above purchasedonce again Real estate Properties inthe “NewJersey”- Hopewell “Township”know to be properties Namely 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 (21) Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates of America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, herein“Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” In that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, on the exact date of “August 26th 2015 issuedanother Personal check drawnonCitibank N.A. BR # 128 37-57 74th Street JacksonHeights, NewYork 11372 account # 021000098:9947509687:0121 To Prose Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereininthis time in the amount of the Amount of $1,220.00U.S. Dollars: a. Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinfurther providedsaidcheck datedAug 26th 2015 fromthe Newaddress 156 Coburn Road Pennington, NJ08534 drawnonce again from “Citibank” b. the secondCheck of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinwritten for $1,220.00 U.S. Dollars was once again process at PLS Check Cashers 5823 Gulf Freeway HoustonTexas 77023viatheir “Wire Services”onbehalf of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII herein c. “However”this time on27th of August 2015 inthe am hour PLS Check Cashers at 5823 Gulf Freeway HoustonTexas 77023 toldProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton”hereinafterPLS Check Cashers first ran secondcheck through their electronic checking devise, that their district manger statedthey wouldnot be cashing said secondCheck of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinwritten for $1,220.00U.S. Dollars d. the Newaddress locatedat 156 Coburn Road Pennington, NJ08534 under direct ownershipof Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra
  • 39. Khare”, hereinandon April 19th , 2013 “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinfully once again soldsaid property 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 this time for $365,000.00U.S. Dollars as describedinthe Personal Check filedas Pro Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStatesof America”et al, and Co- Plaintiff “State of Texas” et al, hereinexhibit (B) insupport of this complaint made herein e. Said Personal check of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, hereinissuedfrom“Citibank”was Drawn on the exact same address of 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 toa home which was soldon “April 19th , 2013 for $365,000.00 U.S. Dollars “However” but saidcheck for “Constructionservices”was made out on August 22th 2015.. To Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII…herein..? f. Said check was made out from a sold resident said Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, herein“assuming”having no (legal) control over (once) again in 2015… since saidproperty namely “Material facts”supporting that “April 19th , 2013 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 for $365,000.00 U.S. Dollars g. Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al andCo-Defendant(s) Geeta International “Legal Division”et al collectively having placement of GeetaFoods - NewYork, USA SatelliteOffice Jackson Heights, NYTel: +1-917-573-1923 Fax: +1-413-581-7495Email: info@geetaint.com h. Jackson Heights, NY i. Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) Geeta International “Legal Division”et al “GeetaFoods - NewYork, USA Satellite Officeis in the same Location City) for Citibank N.A. BR # 128 37-57 74th Street JacksonHeights, NewYork 11372account # 021000098:9947509687:0121 which Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, providedsaidcheck dated Aug 26th 2015 fromthe Newaddress 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 drawnonce again from “Citibank”from a soldresident said Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, herein“assuming”having no (legal) control over (once) again in 2015… since saidproperty namely “Material facts” supporting that “April 19th , 2013 156 CoburnRoadPennington, NJ 08534 Property was soldfor $365,000.00 U.S. Dollars whichsaid Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinin2015 once again writtencheck froma Property sold…..?
  • 40. (22) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” ProSe Plaintiff on his (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America” et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al states, declare andAffirm That all factual circumstances andextreme sound“logical circumstance” and events adding (Pro Se Plaintiff) personal dealing withChief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, hereininthat Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, (whom) actually whomever he maybe hereinis “actually physically”one in the same “Gaeta International et al” a International (RICO) EnterpriseCartel based in Bangkok , Thailand (23) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” ProSe Plaintiff on his (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al states, declare andaffirms that Co-Defendant(s) GEETA GroupLLC (Email) address namely geetaint@loxinfo.co.th; is the direct email Link to a International (RICO) Enterprise Cartelbased in Bangkok , Thailand In comparison to: GEETA brandedWholesale DistributionandInternational Trading 2194/48-49 Bang Koh Laem, Bangkok - 10120 Thailand Tel : (+662) 291-1968Fax: (+662) 688-1146Email: listed as: contact@geetaint.com Retail SupermarketsValueMart Co Ltd. Soi 20 Central SukhumvitBangkok , Thailand Tel: (+662) 261-5955 Fax: (+662) 261-5859 Email: Listed as: info@geetaint.com
  • 41. Restaurants: Soi12, SukhumvitRoad, Bangkok , Thailand Tel: (+662) 653- 1171 Tel: (+662) 653-1173Fax:(+662) 663-3721Email: Listed as: info@geetaint.com (24) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” ProSe Plaintiff on his (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America” et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al states, declare andAffirmthat Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, having beenfurtherance said Specifically, “International RICO Racket” toDefraud“UnitedStates of America”as a Whole”in Violationof 18 U.S.C. § 371 §371 withall (Defendant(s) and Co-Defendant(s) collectively committedto“Conspiracy tocommit offense or to defraudUnitedStates” Specifically, violationsof “18 USC § 1343 RICO Wire Fraud”, and Specifically, violationsof RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) “Money laundering” Specifically, violationsof RICO statue “18 USC § 1341 “Mail Fraud”, To (Now) added that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al andCo-Defendant(s) “Geeta International “Legal Division”et al” Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare herein engaging fully in collusion, concert andconspirer against Co-Plaintiff “United States of America”et al Title III: International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-TerrorismAct of 2001. (25) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff on his
  • 42. (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America” et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al States, Declare andAffirmthat Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al” GeetaFoods - California, USA Satellite Office andGeetaFoods - NewYork, USA SatelliteOffice GeetaFoods - California, USA Satellite Office Danville, CA 94506 Tel: +1-925-282-3482 Fax: +1-682-292-2887 Email: info-feedback@geetaint.com GeetaFoods - NewYork, USA SatelliteOffice Jackson Heights, NY Tel: +1-917-573-1923 Fax: +1-413-581-7495 Email: info@geetaint.com Having been(Physically) usedinpast, present to“facilitateand formulated”withinCo-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”et al Jurisdictionsaid “International RICO EnterpriseRacket”engaging in“among other things” “Mutable Counts”of interstate“Mail andWire Fraud”, and “International Mail and Wire Fraud”, International Money Laundering, scheme of things tooperate collectively as a (secret) “EnterpriseRacket”withinthe Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStatesof America”Jurisdictionviainadditiona (RICO) scheme of things through “Satellite Transmission” (26) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff on his (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of
  • 43. Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al in that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” hereinon the exact time frame of July 17th as describedinparagraph(9) above: (July 17th 2015) Thanks Louis. I havegone California on three days holiday. Shall speak to you on return Monday or Tuesday Sent frommy iPhone (July 17th 2015) Have safetrip :-) Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”hereinfully engage in same continuance (RICO) “scheme of things throughtoinclude “Satellite Transmission”withinthe Co-Plaintiff(s) Jurisdictionwithinthe State of Californiaat Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al andCo-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”undisclosed“Satellite Transmission” location. (27) (July 17th 2015) Thanks Louis. I havegone California on three days holiday. Shall speak to you on return Monday or Tuesday Sent frommy iPhone (July 17th 2015) Have safetrip :-) (28)
  • 44. Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” hereinfurther “Declare”, “State”, and “Affirm”before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”for his own personal behalf as follows: a. Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare” hereinlegally with property holdings at 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534, 616 BourneCt Danville CA 94506, 3429 NottinghamLninMontgomery, Texas 77356 andthe fourthproperty alsolocatedin Montgomery, Texas ina private gated community on a golf course on a (Nice) Lake in which Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare” didin fact took ProSe Plaintiff to, (2) properties onthe exact date of “July 7th 2015 12:00 (Noon) amhour namely 3429 NottinghamLninMontgomery, Texas 77356 and*Photos on file withChief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare present onproperty located in Montgomery, Texas ina private gatedcommunity on a golf course on a (Nice) Lake in saidphotos. (29) As one suchproperty namely 3429 NottinghamLninMontgomery, Texas 77356 already under contract signedby the ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” on the exact time frame of 12:10 am hour at “The HiltonHotel” locatedat 12400 Greens point Dr. HoustonTexas 77060 On the 22nd day of August 2015 (all) being physically conductedon “video surveillance”of the “HiltonHotel”as well as on photos on file withthe Pro Se Plaintiff hereinandChief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, in said photos To include Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, on the exact time frame of 12:10 am hour CaliforniaDriver License #E2336392 Expire 01-31-2018home address at 616 Bourne Ct Danville CA 94506 was (Photocopy) and Phone Message wire Communication(IM) acopy to saidChief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, himself at the exact time frame of 12:10 am witha photoattachedof the ProSe Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII”herein U.S. veteranphotoI.D.
  • 45. b. Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, first stepcommitted to “Medical Battery”tosubmitting ProSe Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereintoa unwanted secretly “Forensic Mental Evaluation” over aperiodof several claimbusiness meeting dinners inMontgomery Texas startfirst occurredon the exact date of “July 7th 2015 After the enhancement barging planof showing off the Nice (2) properties as describedinparagraph28(a) above Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, hereinwiththe false, fraudulent pretenses, representations of material facts that there are indeed(3) other properties locatedinMontgomery Texas for a total of (5) being a party tothis Business dealings on“July 7th 2015 whicha constructionbusinessnegations didinfact assumedat a India Restaurant in Montgomery Texas whichthe Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinfurther with “Intent”false, fraudulent pretenses, representations of material facts statedof having a Builder submitting abid of $56 per sq. ft. for complete constructionplanon all (5) properties locatedin Montgomery Texas for a total cost of $103,1523429 being the unidentifiedContractor bidfor start upNew Constructionon3429 NottinghamLninMontgomery, Texas 77356 c. Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” hereinlegally never made any “formal discussionor notice or legal rebuttal”of material facts concerning the ProSe Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinand all acting subs-contractors as being described Alex- Framer- 281-467-6656 Ray-Concrete-713-539-8577 Melvin-Plumber-713-534-2368 Carlos -Electrical-832-707-6180 being not involvedinthe Constructionof (5) propertieslocatedin Montgomery Texas whichall said Sub Contractor lower there combine labor cost to accommodate Defendant and Co-Defendant(s) collectively
  • 46. (30) Pro Se Plaintiff further Assert, declareandaffirmbefore the “Honorable Justice”Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” and Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC et al, hereinlegally was fully aware, with intent knowledge to engage in deceiving , trickery, directedat ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” construction negations base on$46. Per sq. ft. (RICO) price fixing scheme of things for total constructionof (5) properties withafuture cost inexcess of $425,000.00 U.S. Dollars under the fully false, fraudulent pretenses, representations of “material facts” that there are indeed(5) properties locatedin Montgomery Texas andready for “New Home Construction”whichinfact was false, and Materially bogus, Pro Se Plaintiff showsuch Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare” Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC et al, hereinlegally was fully aware, withintent knowledge todeceive, trickery, as described transmits or causes to be transmittedby means of phone communications, including “Internet wire”(emails) andPhone Message wire Communication(IM) and “Satellite Transmission” withCo-Defendant(s) TrillionaireAssetset al, Co- Defendant(s) Trillionaire Realty et al, Co-Defendant(s) andCo-Defendant(s) Greg Miller fully conspire involvedintent knowledge todeceive, trickery, andcausing his Personal added “Deceptive Trade Practices Acts, Broughtinconjunctionwith“Common law” Fraud and Breachof Contract, and “Tortious InterferencewithExisting Contract”, (31) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII herein furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” for Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” herein onhis (Personal) behalf and on the behalf of
  • 47. Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America” et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al in that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare” hereinon the exact time frame of the Monthof “June”, “July” and “August”of 2015 Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta Group LLC, and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare hereinengaging fully incollusion, concert and conspirer Subjecting the ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” a naturalized citizenof “UnitedStates of America”and many, many, others similarly same qualify under “Constitute Citizenship”guaranteedprotectionof the judicial branch of the Co-Plaintiff(s) “UntiedStatesof America” et al “judicial branch” of government and the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” a naturalized citizenof “UnitedStates of America”and many, many, others similarly same qualify under “Constitute Citizenshipguaranteedprotectionof Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al Judicial branchof government Which ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” being a (USN) Veteran should100% add such qualify “Constitute Citizenshipguaranteedprotectionof the judicial branch of the Co-Plaintiff(s) “UntiedStates of America”et al Judicial Government and the Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al Judicial Branch of Government (32) The Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” a naturalizedcitizenof “UnitedStates of America”and many, many, others similarly same qualify under “Constitute Citizenshipguaranteedprotectionof the “Judicial Branches” of The Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and the Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al
  • 48. However Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, Co- Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta International “Legal Division”et al”, “Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare herein Engaging further fully incollusion, concert andconspirer against The Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” a naturalizedcitizenof “UnitedStates of America”and many, many, others similarly same qualify under “Constitute Citizenshipguaranteedprotectionof the “Judicial Branches” of The Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and the Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al in that Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta Group LLC, and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare herein deniedDue process of the law and equal protectionof the law of The Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and the Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al in this “International RICO Cartel Enterprise Racket” of “Deceptive Trade Practices Acts, anddidin all factual circumstances obtain, concealedand destroyeda“ConstructionContract”of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII hereinwithinthe “International Jurisdiction”of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta International “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational Co. Ltd.”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare herein Namely “Thailand” fully deniedProSe Plaintiff “Due process andEqual Protectionof The Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and the Co- Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al Constitutional rightsover said Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII” a naturalizedcitizenof “United States of America”and many, many, others similarly same qualify under “Constitute Citizenshipguaranteedprotectionof the “Judicial Branches”of The
  • 49. Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and the Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al having business dealing withthis “International RICO Cartel Enterprise Racket”describedfully herein having already beeninstitutedandfully commenced inthe “State of California” The State of Texas, “The State of NewYork” and (Now) upon informationand strong belief, Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational, Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta International “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC also knows tobe “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” , Co-Defendant Vipul Khare And Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Operating in(RICO) same “patternand practice”scheme of things for sometime inthe “prime real-estatearea”of “Bogota Florida”whichSecretary for the “State of Florida”records indicating showing “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” Having so physically operating for a time in Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America“Jurisdictionnamely the “State of Florida”operating under the “Title” “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” As describedinparagraph (33) below Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” “Managing Director”, location “Bangkok Metropolitanarea, Thailand, “Industry “Food and Beverages” with Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al “Logo”making “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” AlsoCo-Defendant(s) anda official party to this “International RICO Cartel EnterpriseRacket” against ProSe Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, Co- Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al herein. (33)
  • 50. Dr. D.C. Khare Managing Director Location Bangkok Metropolitan Area, Thailand Industry Food & Beverages Current Websites (34) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, Co-Plaintiff(s) “United States of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al herein furtherance’s “Declare”, State, andAffirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al andCo-Defendant(s) “Geeta International “Legal Division” et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co- Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” And Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare conspirer withextreme andhostile acts and event to FraudCo-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and did in factual circumstance subject ProSe Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII”herein, and many, many, others Similarly same having (American) “businessdealing”with Co- Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC locatedat 1600 River Pointe Dr. Apt. 812, in
  • 51. Conroe, Texas 77304 toa foreignlegal rules andregulationJurisdictionstatusof “Thailand” Further this “International RICO CartelEnterpriseRacket”, conspireto, and in fact did “Subjecting”the ProSe Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, herein and many, many, others similarly same to “foreigncorruption”inbusiness dealing, Furtherance’s “Subjecting”the ProSe Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, hereinto “Cyber Fraud” and “aggravated Identity Theft” being conducted in “Thailand” secretly far away from the “Judicial Branch” of Government of the Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStatesof America”et al and Judicial Branchof Government of Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al herein “equal protectionof the law and due process, for all (American) citizens of the Co-Plaintiff(s) United States of America and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” fully enjoyment and protectionthereof. (35) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al herein onthe Behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al furtherance’s “Declare”, State, andAffirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare collectively hereinhaving for sometimes having as a Whole” International RICO Enterprise Cartel”being in Violationof 18 U.S.C. § 371 §371 withall Defendant(s) andCo-Defendant(s) committedto“Conspiracy to commit offense or todefraud UnitedStates” (36) Further this “International RICO Cartel EnterpriseRacket”, conspireto defraud “United States” is alsobasedupon the International currency exchange rate”of the Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”U.S. Dollars in that for each
  • 52. conspirer committedandachieved todefraud “United States”this “International RICO Cartel Enterprise Racket”, Gaining a larger “monetary value”once depositing all illegal Money laundering scheme of thing into eachforeign“International RICO Cartel Enterprise Racket”, foreigncurrency exchange rate toshore up Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” AndCo-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare “Local and mainly “foreignAssets” collectively inthis “International RICO CartelEnterpriseRacket”, conspire to defraud“United States” (37) *For example (A) before the “Honorable Justice” Said Personal check of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinissuedfrom“Citibank”was Drawn on the exact same address of (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 toa home whichwas soldon January 2006 for $1,075,000.00inJanuary 2006 $1,075,000.00 U.S. Dollars worth(today) in Thai Baht exchange rates “Thailand” 38874150.00 Thai Baht *For example (B) before the “Honorable Justice” Said check datedAug 26th 2015 fromthe Newaddress 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 drawnonce again from “Citibank” from a soldresident said Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, herein“assuming”having no (legal) control over (once) again in 2015… Since saidproperty namely “Material facts”supporting that “April 19th , 2013 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 Property was soldfor $365,000.00 U.S. Dollars $365,000.00U.S. Dollars worth(today) in Thai Baht exchange rates “Thailand” 13202780.00Thai Baht
  • 53. *For example (C) before the “Honorable Justice” Said Personal check of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinissuedfrom“Citibank”was Drawn on the exact same address of (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 toa home whichwas soldon January 2006 for $1,075,000.00inJanuary 2006 $1,075,000.00 U.S. Dollars worth(today) in Indian Rupee exchange rates “Thailand” 70976875.00IndianRupee *For example (D) before the “Honorable Justice” Said check datedAug 26th 2015 fromthe Newaddress 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 drawnonce again from “Citibank” from a soldresident said Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, herein“assuming”having no (legal) control over (once) again in 2015… Since saidproperty namely “Material facts”supporting that “April 19th , 2013 156 CoburnRoad Pennington, NJ08534 Property was soldfor $365,000.00 U.S. Dollars $365,000.00U.S. Dollars worth(today) in exchange IndianRupee exchange rates “India”24099125.00 IndianRupee (38) Which “Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton“ hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”, State, andAffirmbefore the “Honorable Justice”onbehalf of Co- Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al this “International RICO Cartel Enterprise Racket”, scheme of things in conspire todefraud “UnitedStates”is alsobased “among other things” the “International currency exchange rate”of the Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”U.S. Dollars and that “Thai Baht” exchange rates “Thailand” and that “Indian Rupee” exchange rates “India”which Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et
  • 54. al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare Collectively hereinhaving “Monetary ForeignHoldings, Assets, properties, Corporations, Business, Companies, Retails, shops, import andexport, stores, homes, cars, chattel ect… basedin“Thailand and “India” in that for each (RICO) conspire committedandachievedtodefraud “UnitedStates”as a whole Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare Collectively hereinhaving “Mutable Monetary ForeignHoldings, Assets, properties, Corporations, Business, Companies, Retails, shop, import and export, stores, homes, cars, chattel ect…is being (officially) financial shoredup and monetary secured onsaidexchange rate from (Financial Global) marketing collapsing disastersby focusing on “among other things”a scheming “International RICO Cartel Enterprise Racket”, of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co- Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare todefraud Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al in a fraudulent “patternand practice” fully up to date currently engaging inamong other things a(RICO) scheme of things inprime real-estate now (active) infraudactivates engagedinCo- Plaintiff(s) Jurisdictionnamely (Texas) in a International “Money Laundering “scheme of things”within the Jurisdictionof Co-Plaintiff(s) “United Statesof America”et al and withinthe JurisdictionCo-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al Jurisdiction collectively Committedtoand engaging in conspirer by all Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co- Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC,
  • 55. Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.”and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare collectively conspire toFraud said“UnitedStates of America” and Texas Namely Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”et al and namely Co- Plaintiff “State of Texas” et al herein (39) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al hereinonthe Behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al furtherance’s “Declare”, State, andAffirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare collectively hereinhaving intheir “International RICO Cartel” Namely GeetaInternational Co. Ltd. “Shipping & Marine Supplier”based in “Bangkok “Thailand” among other “International (Locations) Geeta International Co. Ltd. “Shipping & Marine Supplier”having Internationally foreignshipping assets and making such“Port of Calls” Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, hereinfurtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Namely Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational Co. Ltd. “Shipping & Marine Supplier” Having formulated additional “International RICO Enterprise Racket” scheme fully engaging in among other things “Mutable Counts” inHiding, obscuring, and transporting (American) goods revivedinthis Money launder (RICO) scheme of things back to Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co- Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare “International RICO Cartel”, mutable Monetary ForeignHoldings, Assets, properties, Corporations, Business, Companies, Retails, shops, import andexport business, stores, and homes.
  • 56. (40) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” this “International RICO Cartel EnterpriseRacket”, schemeof things inconspire todefraud “UnitedStates” upon informationand belief Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co- Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare “International RICO Cartel”, Having furtherance devisedaformulation, structure, monetary laundering (RICO) systemwithinthe Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates of America”et al Jurisdictioninthat as follows: 1. The exact same address of (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 toa home whichwas sold on January 2006 for $1,075,000.00 but saidcheck for “Constructionservices”was made out on August 22nd 2015..And the Personal Check filedas ProSe Plaintiff, “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStatesof America”et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”et al, hereinexhibit (B) insupport of this complaint made herein 2. And SaidPersonal check of Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandra Khare”, hereinissuedfrom“Citibank” which was Drawn on the exact same address of 156 Coburn Road Pennington, NJ08534 toa home which was sold on “April 19th , 2013 for $365,000.00 U.S. Dollars “However” but said check for “Constructionservices”was made out on August 22th 2015… 3. $1,075,000.00+$365,000.00 =$1.44 (Million) U.S. Dollars ina “International RICO Cartel”, property scam(among others) inwhich said Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) “GeetaInternational “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, Co- Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.”and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare “International RICO Cartel”, racket hereinhaving “Soldsaid
  • 57. property “among others”toinclude but not limitedtonone other collectively “themselves”inthis (RICO) racket tofurtherance’s commit fraud of the Co-Plaintiff “The UnitedStates of America”et al and Co- Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al in the past, present andfuture obscuring, hiding, laundering sucha well integratedconglomerateof “International Business inits owntax free have zone hiddenwell within Co-Plaintiff (UnitedStates of America) scheme of things being namely a International Corporationof mutable business legal as such however well as facts proving hereina turn intoa well formulated “International RICO EnterpriseRacket”basedin“Thailand” 4. Namely Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, Co- Defendant(s) GeetaInternational et al and Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta International “Legal Division”et al”, Co-Defendant(s) GeetaGroupLLC, (40) Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles HamiltonII, Co-Plaintiff(s) “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirmbefore the “Honorable U.S. Justice” inthat Namely Chief Defendant “Doctor DineshChandraKhare”, hereinhaving “Possibly”toaid furtherance’s ainternational (RICO) scheme of things against the Pro Plaintiff “Louis Charles HamiltonII”, Co-Plaintiff(s) UnitedStates of America”et al, And Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas”et al to include the “State of California and The State of “NewYork”…among others, infalse impersonationas a License (Doctor) withinthe Jurisdictionof Co-Plaintiff “UnitedStates of America”et al and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”in direct violationof TEX OC. CODE ANN. § 164.052:Texas Statutes - Section164.052: as describedinparagraph TEX OC. CODEANN. § 164.052 :Texas Statutes - Section164.052: PROHIBITED PRACTICES BY PHYSICIAN OR LICENSEAPPLICANT(a) A physicianor an applicant for a license topractice medicine commits aprohibitedpracticeif that person:(1) submits tothe board a false or misleading statement, document, or certificateinan applicationfor a license;(2) presents tothe boarda license, certificate, or diplomathat was illegally or fraudulently obtained;(3) commits fraud or deceptionintaking or passing an examination;(4) uses alcohol or drugs
  • 58. in an intemperate manner that, inthe board's opinion, couldendanger a patient's life;(5) commits unprofessional or dishonorable conduct that is likely to deceive or defraudthe public, as providedby Section164.053, Or injure the public;(6) uses anadvertising statement that is false, misleading, or deceptive;(7) advertises professional superiority or the performance of professional service inasuperior manner if that advertising is not readily subject toverification;(8) purchases, sells, barters, or uses, or offers to purchase, sell, barter, or use, amedical degree, license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a license, certificate, or diplomain or incident toan applicationto the board for a license topractice medicine;(9) alters, with fraudulent intent, amedical license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a medical license, certificate, or diploma;(10) uses amedical license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a medical license, certificate, or diplomathat has been:(A) fraudulently purchasedor issued;(B) counterfeited;or(C) materially altered;(11) impersonates or acts as proxy for another personin an examination requiredby this subtitle for amedical license;(12) engages inconduct that subverts or attempts tosubvert anexaminationprocess requiredby this subtitle for a medical license;(13) impersonates aphysicianor permits another touse the person's license or certificate topractice medicine inthis state;(14) directly or indirectly employs apersonwhose license topractice medicine has been suspended, canceled, or revoked;(15) associates inthe practice of medicine with a person:(A) whose license topractice medicine has beensuspended, canceled, or revoked;or(B) who has beenconvictedof the unlawful practice of medicine in this state or elsewhere; (16) performs or procures a criminal abortion, aids or abets in the procuring of a criminal abortion, attempts toperformor procure a criminal abortion, or attempts toaid or abet the performance or procurement of a criminal abortion;(17) directly or indirectly aids or abets the practice of medicine by a person, partnership, association, or corporationthat is not licensedtopractice medicine by the board;(18) performs anabortionon a woman who is pregnant witha viable unbornchild during the thirdtrimester of the pregnancy unless: (A) the abortion is necessary toprevent the deathof the woman;(B) the viable unborn childhas a severe, irreversible brainimpairment;or(C) the woman is diagnosedwitha significant likelihoodof suffering imminent severe,
  • 59. irreversiblebraindamage or imminent severe, irreversibleparalysis;or(19) performs an abortionon an unemancipatedminor without the writtenconsent of the child's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian or without a court order, as providedby Section33.003or 33.004, Family Code, authorizing the minor to consent tothe abortion, unless the physicianconcludes that on the basis of the physician's good faithclinical judgment, a conditionexists that complicatesthe medical conditionof the pregnant minor and necessitatesthe immediate abortionof her pregnancy to avert her deathor to avoid a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily functionand that there is insufficient time toobtainthe consent of the child's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian.(b) For purposes of Subsection(a)(12), conduct that subverts or attempts tosubvertthe medical licensing examinationprocess includes, as prescribedby boardrules, conduct that violates:(1) the security of the examinationmaterials;(2) the standardof test administration;or(3) the accreditationprocess.(c) The boardshall adopt the forms necessary for physicians toobtainthe consent requiredfor an abortionto be performedonan unemancipatedminor under Subsection(a). The form executedtoobtainconsent or any other requireddocumentationmust be retainedby the physicianuntil the later of the fifthanniversary of the date of the minor's majority or the seventhanniversary of the date the physician receivedor createdthe documentationfor the record. (41) ” In Direction violationof CaliforniaPenal Code 529 PC “False impersonation”(alsoknownas “false personation”) is a crime in California. Under CaliforniaPenal Code 529 PC, you commit the crime of false impersonationwhenyou: 1. Falsely personate someone (that is, pretendtobe them) intheir public or private capacity;and 2. Performany other act that might cause the personyou are impersonating to become liable toa lawsuit or prosecutionor become obligatedtopay money, or which might cause you to get some benefit fromimpersonating him/her.