The document summarizes a presentation on transforming contingent workforces into a competitive advantage. It discusses evolving procurement models for managing contingent talent from decentralized to total talent management. It also covers legal issues regarding worker classification, including the risks of misclassifying employees as contractors. Best practices are outlined such as clearly defining responsibilities in contracts and periodic communication between all parties.
13. Firms Use a Wide Variety of Non-Employees
Based on what you know, which of the following types of ‘workers’ did work on
behalf of your company/organization during 2014?
Source: Staffing Industry Analysts, Global Total Talent Management Survey, May 2015
17. Growth in capture of SOW spend
MSP SOW management expanding to include strategy consulting contracts as
well as large service contracts
Moving from a supplier management focus to predictive sourcing,
supported by investments in analytics
Approx 50% of MSP vendors are currently investing in analytics
Growing investments in talent consulting teams to complement
traditional service offerings
Increasing Freelancer Management System (FMS) platform
integration as well as worker tracking solutions
Traction of ‘Contingent RPO’ programs
Insourcing of mature programs
Emergence of Total Talent Management solutions
MSP Trends
20. Sourcing Decisions Across Work Types Becomes more
Sophisticated as Visibility Improves
How will the following employee types change as a share of your total labour force over the next ten
years?
Temporary agency workers are not regarded as a first preference
N=196 (International results)
Source: SIA
24. Evolution of a
Program: 2015
Decentralized
• Several suppliers
• Procurement done on an ad-
hoc basis
• Management done internally
Master Vendor
• One supplier (possibly
managing 2nd and 3rd
tier suppliers)
• One point of contact
• Direct cost savings on
bill rate and usage
• Customized SLA’s and
process
Managed Service
Provider (MSP)
• Contingent workforce spend
under management
• One contact point
• Direct cost savings on bill
rate/usage
• Customized SLA’s and
process
• Non-compliant spend
elimination
• Total cost of ownership
savings
Total Talent
Management
• Total workforce spend
under management
• Complete workforce
visibility
• Direct cost savings on bill
rate and usage
• Customized SLA’s and
process
• Non-compliant spend
elimination
• Increased total
cost of ownership savings
• Additional productivity
and process savings
• High degree of
value added services
CW as a
Strategic
Competitive
Advantage
• CW talent as business
differentiator
• Management strategies
move beyond tactical
considerations into
strategic ones
• Combination of multiple
CW models to solve
complex business
problems.
• Technology crosses
multiple platforms
in the enterprise
• Risks managed on a
total enterprise basis
with big picture focus
on risks of action and
inaction
Preferred
suppliers
• Selective set of
suppliers selected
• Contracts in place
• Service level
agreements (SLA’s) in
place
Procurement HR
25. What Does TTM Look Like?
Technology
Work Outside the Building
Work Inside the
Building
Exit
Management
Identify
Attract
Engage
Retain
Exit
TTA
TTM
Source: SIA
26. Decentralized
• Several suppliers
• Procurement done on an ad-
hoc basis
• Management done internally
Master Vendor
• One supplier (possibly
managing 2nd and 3rd
tier suppliers)
• One point of contact
• Direct cost savings on bill
rate and usage
• Customized SLA’s and
process
Managed Service
Provider (MSP)
• Contingent workforce spend
under management
• One contact point
• Direct cost savings on bill
rate/usage
• Customized SLA’s and process
• Non-compliant spend
elimination
• Total cost of ownership savings
Total Talent
Management
• Total workforce spend
under management
• Complete workforce
visibility
• Direct cost savings on bill
rate and usage
• Customized SLA’s and
process
• Non-compliant spend
elimination
• Increased total
cost of ownership savings
• Additional productivity and
process savings
• High degree of
value added services
CW as a Strategic Competitive Advantage
• CW talent as business differentiator
• Management strategies move beyond tactical considerations into strategic ones
• Combination of multiple CW models to solve complex business problems.
• Technology crosses multiple platforms
in the enterprise
• Risks managed on a total enterprise basis with big picture focus on risks of action and inaction
Preferred suppliers
• Selective set of suppliers
selected
• Contracts in place
• Service level agreements
(SLA’s) in place
Evolution of a Program: 2016
Procurement HR
29. About Russell Tobin
Direct hire & contract staffing
firm
We focus on a variety of
verticals
9 offices throughout the U.S.
30. The Supplier Perspective
Structured program which allows flexibility
Clear metrics and SLA’s
Consistency in communication
Aligned with best practices
31. Value of working with an MSP
Enterprise clients
Specialization
Leverage technology
“Recession proof”
35. Employee v. Independent Contractor
In September 2015, David Weil, Administrator of the Wage and
Hour Division of the United Stated Department of Labor, issued
an “Administrator Interpretation,” wherein he stated bluntly:
“[M]ost workers are employees under the FLSA’s broad
definitions.”
36. Summary of the AI’s Views
The AI represents an effort to dramatically expand the “economic
realities” test.
Any business that uses independent contractors exclusively or to
receive services that are important to its success should review the
AI and consider carefully how the Wage and Hour Division and Courts
applying the “Economic Realities” test would view independent
contractor relationships.
37. Risks of Misclassification
Liability for any failure to pay at least the minimum wage for all
time worked,
Liability for any failure to pay overtime for work in excess of 40
hours per week,
Reimbursement of employee expenses,
Provision of various employee benefits,
Withholding of income taxes and FICA,
Payment of unemployment insurance contributions, and
Provision of workers compensation insurance coverage.
38. Looking Ahead
The DOL has made it clear of its stated intent to aggressively
challenge independent contractor classifications.
In light of the policy changes and a promised ramp-up in
investigations/enforcement, it has become riskier for any individual
worker to be classified as an independent contractor.
Recent cases: Uber, Lyft, GrubHub, FedEx.
40. FLSA Exemptions
Employees are considered “exempt” from receiving overtime pay if they meet the salary
threshold (***) and fall under one of the following “white collar” exemptions:
Executive – managing enterprise/department of enterprise; hiring/firing power
Administrative – office/non-manual work involving discretion and independent judgment involving
significant matters
Professional
Learned Professional – work requiring advanced knowledge in a field of science/learning and customarily acquired by
prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction (e.g., attorneys, doctors, accountants)
Creative Professional – work requiring invention, imagination, originality or talent in recognized field of artistic or
creative endeavor
Outside Sales – making sales/obtaining orders or contracts away from employer’s place of business
Computer – computer systems analyst, computer programmer, software engineer or similarly skilled
worker
41. *** New FLSA Salary Threshold
The current salary threshold to be exempt from the FLSA overtime
regulations is $455/week ($23,360/year).
In May 2016, the DOL announced that, effective December 1, 2016,
the threshold will become $913/week ($47,476/year).
This threshold will also now be increased every three years to keep
up with inflation, beginning on January 1, 2020.
Non-discretionary bonuses and incentive payments (including
commissions) can satisfy up to 10% of the new threshold.
43. The NLRB’s Browning-Ferris Decision
In August 2015, the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB”)
overruled 30 years of joint employer precedent in its decision it
published in the Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. matter.
In summary, the NLRB announced that it will no longer require direct
and immediate control over terms and conditions of employment to
establish a joint employer relationship.
44. The New Joint Employer Test
In analyzing whether a joint employer relationship exists, the NLRB
stated that a case-by-case, fact-intensive evaluation of the allocation
and exercise of control in the workplace must be performed.
In finding that Browning-Ferris Industries (“BFI”) was a joint employer
with its subcontractor, Leadpoint, the NLRB relied on the following
factors:
Hiring
Wages
Discipline
Supervision
45. What’s Next?
In January 2016, BFI appealed the NLRB’s decision to the U.S. Court of
Appeals in Washington, D.C.
Several organizations joined BFI’s appeal with supporting briefs of their
own.
Per the Court’s Order entered on June 22, 2016, final briefs will not be
filed until October 19, 2016.
46. Mitigating Joint Employment Issues
Parties should work with each other at the contract stage to carefully
spell out the allocation of responsibility and risk.
Indemnification – allocates obligations when third party claims arise
Equal Employment Opportunity – both parties’ responsibility
ADA compliance – both parties’ responsibility
Wage and Hour/Benefits – agency’s responsibility; though agency should
ensure that clients: (1) understand applicable overtime requirements; (2) do
not allow “off the clock” work; and (3) sign off on worker time sheets.
Background/Credit Checks/Immigration/I-9 Compliance – agency’s
responsibility
48. What the Law Says
The Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”) requires
companies to offer affordable minimum
essential healthcare coverage to 95% of their
employees.
49. Mitigating Risk
Again, clients/agencies/MSPs should ensure proper risk allocation at
the contract stage so that proper protections are given to clients.
Suppliers should undertake responsibility of offering affordable,
minimum value healthcare to all its employees and to provide notice
about the insurance marketplaces.
Agreements can also provide that both parties view the staffing
agency as the common law employer and provide appropriate
protections to clients even if they are found to be an employer in a
legal proceeding.
51. Best Practices
Clients should work with high quality staffing firms that are well-
versed in the industry and have demonstrated superior management
of a contingent workforce.
Create clear and articulate contracts that define the relationship
and responsibilities of the parties.
Periodic communication between the client, staffing firm and
workers.
Review information on temporary workers on the EEOC and ADA
websites.