Shahtaj Keerio
14IN68
Presentation Topic
Design For Assembly
Contents
 History
 Design for assembly
 Purpose of design for assembly
 Assembly Methods
 Conclusion
 References
History
 1960s-1970s the first evaluation method was
developed at Hitachi and called assembly
evaluation method (AEM).
 Starting in 1977 Geoff Boothroyd developed the
design for assembly method (DFA).
Design For Assembly
 “A process for improving product design for easy
and low-cost assembly, focusing on functionality
and on assemblability concurrently.“
OR
 It is a process by which products are designed with
the ease of assembly in mind.
 If product contains fewer parts it will take less time
to assemble there by reducing assembly costs.
Purpose Of Design For
Assembly
 Reduce cost of assembly
 Improve quality and reliability
 Reduce part inventory
 Reduce production equipment
Assembly Methods
 Manual assembly
 Fixed automatic assembly
 Flexible automatic assembly Design for
Assembly
Design Guidelines For
Manual Assembly
 eliminate the need for workers to make
decisions or adjustments.
 ensure accessibility and visibility.
 eliminate the need for assembly tools and
gauges (i.e. prefer self-locating parts). Design for
Assembly
Design Guidelines For
Automated Assembly
 reduce the number of different components by
considering
 does the part move relative to other parts?
 must the part be isolated from other parts
(electrical, vibration, etc.)?
 must the part be separate to allow assembly
(cover plates, etc.)?
 use self-aligning and self-locating features
 avoid screws/bolts.
Conclusion
 DFA is a tool used to assist the design teams in
the design of products that will transition to
productions at a minimum cost, focusing on the
number of parts, handling and ease of assembly.
 Optimization of the part/system assembly.
 DFA is a tool used to select the most cost
effective material and process to be used in the
production in the early stages of product design.
References
http://www.slideshare.net/LeicesterColTechEngCen
tre/design-for-assembly
Presentation_68

Presentation_68

  • 2.
  • 3.
    Contents  History  Designfor assembly  Purpose of design for assembly  Assembly Methods  Conclusion  References
  • 4.
    History  1960s-1970s thefirst evaluation method was developed at Hitachi and called assembly evaluation method (AEM).  Starting in 1977 Geoff Boothroyd developed the design for assembly method (DFA).
  • 5.
    Design For Assembly “A process for improving product design for easy and low-cost assembly, focusing on functionality and on assemblability concurrently.“ OR  It is a process by which products are designed with the ease of assembly in mind.  If product contains fewer parts it will take less time to assemble there by reducing assembly costs.
  • 6.
    Purpose Of DesignFor Assembly  Reduce cost of assembly  Improve quality and reliability  Reduce part inventory  Reduce production equipment
  • 7.
    Assembly Methods  Manualassembly  Fixed automatic assembly  Flexible automatic assembly Design for Assembly
  • 8.
    Design Guidelines For ManualAssembly  eliminate the need for workers to make decisions or adjustments.  ensure accessibility and visibility.  eliminate the need for assembly tools and gauges (i.e. prefer self-locating parts). Design for Assembly
  • 9.
    Design Guidelines For AutomatedAssembly  reduce the number of different components by considering  does the part move relative to other parts?  must the part be isolated from other parts (electrical, vibration, etc.)?  must the part be separate to allow assembly (cover plates, etc.)?  use self-aligning and self-locating features  avoid screws/bolts.
  • 10.
    Conclusion  DFA isa tool used to assist the design teams in the design of products that will transition to productions at a minimum cost, focusing on the number of parts, handling and ease of assembly.  Optimization of the part/system assembly.  DFA is a tool used to select the most cost effective material and process to be used in the production in the early stages of product design.
  • 11.