Premarital sex adolencents at junior high school

Copyright © 2016 American Scientific Publishers Advanced Science Letters
All rights reserved Vol.v (n), p1-p2, 2016
Printed in the United States of America
Premarital Sex Adolescents at Junior High School Student
Pekanbaru Riau
Hetty Ismainar *
Hastuti Marlina**
Yessi Harnani ***
1. Doctoral Student of Public Health, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
2. Public Health School Hang Tuah Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia
3. Doctoral Student of Enviromental Health science, Riau University, Indonesia
Coresponding Author : Hetty Ismainar, ismainarhetty@yahoo.co.id
Background Adolescents is phase transition from childhood to adult.Physical growth and psychological influence
hormonal and sexual desire raising the interest towards sex is unable to control this risk premarital sex. Currently,
behavior that leads to negative has been used by to adolescents in junior high school. Types of activities premarital sex
among touching sensitive area, kissing, necking, petting, intercourse.
Aim To know relations factors (courtship status, knowledge, pornography acces, harmonious family, lifestyle, their
peers and parents monitoring) that affects premarital sex.
Methods, quantitative with the cross sectional design study. Research sample conducted in 400 students at 11 Junior
High School in Pekanbaru Riau. Proportional stratified random sampling, Instrument is questionnaires. Data analysis
univariat, bivariat chy aquare test, multivariate by logistic regression test.
Results showed 20.3% (81) conduct premarital sex, be courting status 53.5%, unharmony family 55,3%, knowledge
51,8%, pornography acces 35%, modern lifestyles 40%, the influence of peers 25.5%, and low parents monitoring
29.5%. Bivariat Analysis with chy square test, showed seven factors are related (p value < 0.05) and factors their peers
4.9 times mostly risk. Multivariate analysis, two factors that most influential towards sex premarital, they are
unharmony family and parents monitoring.
Conclusion there are relations and influence seven factors are towards premarital sex in junior high school student.
Prepare to build formation as PIK-R (information and counseling youth centre), To build BKR (family adolescents
development) as a precautionary measure increase premarital sex incidence
Keyword: adolescents, Premarital Sex, Junior High School
1. INTRODUCTION
Premarital sex is behavior driven by
sexual desire with the opposite gender before
marriage. The activities include groping, kissing,
necking, petting and intercourse. Premarital sex
in the last few decades tended to increase among
adolescents and only a few reported.1
If the
teenagers are unable to control the risk of
premarital sex, they got depressed.2.3
Among the
adolescent of 15-19 years oldwho did premarital
sex, 16 million experienced pregnancy.In the
united states, 47,8 % adolescentsof 9-12 years old
have done premarital sex. Every hour happened
100 pregnancy.4
In Indonesia, 17 % adolescents in
Tasikmalaya claimed to have done premarital
sex, in Cirebon 6.7 %, Bandung and Jakarta 21-
30 %.5
In Pekanbaru, from 600 sample taken by
the researchers, there is found that 38,75% boys
and 16,98 % girls have done premarital sex.
29,46 % is done by 10-15 years old teenagers.6
In reality, premarital sex increase data against
Infection Sexually Transmitted and HIV (Human
Deficiency Virus) as one effect of premarital sex
and sex without condom.7
Other impacts are
unwanted pregnancy, unsafe abortion,and mental
disorder.8
In addition, they would also
facepsychological impact, the guilt and wicked
on theirselves and family. Getting Depressed,
losing the virginity (for girls) and feelingafraid
not to have brighterfuture.9
Some efforts should
be done to minimize premarital sex.10
The efforts
might be doneby restraining the factors that
cause premarital sex.11
Premarital sex on
adolescent is usually done for some reasons:
sense of affection and proving love (35.2 %), the
curiosity and want to try sex, and also afraid of
disappointing and afraid of being broken off the
relationship by the couple. In addition,
premarital sex are caused by less knowledge
about general health of reproduction andthe
danger,the risk, and also lack of knowledge to
avoid it.12
.
Easy access to media especially internet,
is one of the factors that trigger premarital
sex.Easy acces to internet means easy exposed to
pornography.13
Other reasons are lifestyle,
western culture impact, clubbing, alcohol
consumption, less of parents monitoring, most of
the time with their peers so encouragement their

peers are dominant to premarital sex, and the
decline ofreligious values.15 16 13
Many incidence
and impacts to premarital sex. Aim of research
isto know the factors related premarital sex in
Junior High School student.
2. METHOD
The method is analytic quantitative with
cross sectional design. Sample size is 400
students of eleven Junior High Schools in
Pekanbaru, Riau. Using proportional stratified
random sampling (cluster system). Contributing
ten enumerators to collect the data. The
measuring instrument questioners have a validity
and reliability test. Of 420 questioners, 17 were
not completed and 3 sheets were not returned.
For data processing category, it used Chy Square
Test and numeric data used T Test with
estimated CI 95%.Analysis multivariate with
regression logistic with “permodelan”to see a
change Prevalence Odds Ratio (POR).
3. RESULT
The results of the study, 20.3 % have done
premarital sex, 53,5% already have had
girlfriend/boyfriend. Less Knowledge 51,8 % and
35 % had also accessed pornography. Lifestyle
40% as well as the influence their peers 25,5%,
less parents monitoring 29.5 % (table 1) and to
know the relation between variables factors use
chi-square Test with α = 0,05, CI; 95% dan POR
> 1or POR<1 (table 2)
Tabel 1. Result of Univariate Analysis
Premarital
sex
Courtship
status
Knowledge Pornography
acces
Harmonious
family
Life style Peers Parents
Monitoring
Yes No Yes No Low High Yes No Yes No High Low Yes No Low High
81 319 214 186 207 193 140 260 179 221 160 240 102 298 118 282
Note. N= 400 Adolescents
Tabel 2. Result of Bivariate Analysis
Premarital
sex
Courtship
status
∑ Knowledge ∑ Pornography
acces
∑ harmonious
family
∑ Life
style
∑ Peers ∑ parents
Monitoring
∑
Yes No Low High Yes No Yes No High Low Yes No Low High
Yes 62 19 81 54 27 81 51 30 81 61 20 81 54 27 81 43 38 81 46 35 81
No 152 167 319 153 166 319 89 230 319 160 159 319 106 213 319 59 260 319 72 247 319
∑ 214 186 400 207 193 400 140 260 400 221 179 400 160 240 400 102 298 400 118 282 400
P value 0,001 0,004 0,001 0,001 0,001 0,001 0,001
POR 3,6 (2,1-6,3) 2,2 (1,3-3,6) 4,4 (2,6-7,3) 3,0 (1,7-5,3) 4,0 (2,4-6,7) 4,9 (2,9-8,3) 4,5 (2,7-7,5)
Note. N= 400 Adolescents
Tabel 3 Result of Multivariate Selection Criteria
Premarital sex Courtship status Knowledge Pornography acces harmonious family Life style Peers Parents Monitoring
Pvalue< 0.005
0.001 0.004 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Tabel 4 Result of Multivariat Analysis
Courtship status Knowledge Pornography acces harmonious family Life style Peers parents Monitoring
P Value 0,001 0,001 0,001 0,001 0,001 0,001 0,001
POR 9,466 6, 121 7,447 14,309 9,019 9,228 20,237
95% CI for EXP (B)
Lower
Upper
3,899
22,978
2,708
13,832
3,394
16,337
5,406
37,873
4,048
20,097
4,066
20,944
7,912
51,760
Based on the statistics, all variable are
related with premarital sex. Their peers having of
dominant (POR=4.9), second and thirth, parents
monitoring variable and easy to access
pornography. Multivariate analysis that aims to
understand the most dominant relations between
all variabel. An early stage is to put variable
candidates multivariate. Pvalue< 0.25. Selection
multivarite can be seen in table 3. All variable
was a candidate analysis multivariate because the
value of p value <0.25 .We do “permodelan”
multivariate to all variable (table 4)
Based on multivariate analysis, there is no
variable with P value> 0.05. It means all the
independent variable related with premarital sex.
Less of parents monitoring will be influence
20,237 times (CI 9 %: POR=51,760-7,912) to
behave premarital sex .
4. DISCUSSION
Courtship Status
Based on the research, majority students
who did premartial sex are those who has
girlfriend or boyfriend. It is 214 students (53,5%).
There are of course, relationship between having
girlfriend with premarital sex (POR=9.466). Some
of them have dated 2-3 times with long courtship
3-6 months. Courtship is relationship between the
opposite gender who are related specially. It
isinitiated by the introduction until kissing,
necking, petting and intercourse. Almost 80%

student have done premarital sex with his
girlfriend or her boyfriend17
. The survey about
sexual behavior at Junior and Senior High Schools
in Cianjur West Java, it is found that 60% have
intercourse seksual.18
Kutai district teenagers also
did free sex.19
Research in four Junior high schools
in Makassar was done; 45% students have done
dating.20
As normative and moral ethics between
teenager are uncontrolled, it will result
topremarital sex.21
A survey conducted in the
United States found that 47,8 % students of 9-12
years old have done premarital sex, 35 % high
school students have been active in seksual.22
In
this case, parents should understand and give
explanation to their children. Unfortunately, there
are still many parents who have less knowledge
about sex education because of their limited
education. Consequently, they could not guide
their children well.23
Anotherimpacts when
teenagers have courtship and then break off are:
(based on true story)24
they will feel regret and face
confidential and study problem
Based on this research, students who did
dating just talk about sex, hand embraced, holding
the waist (33.2%), kissing, necking (20%). There
is no one who did premarital sex. But if students
are not given education about health reproduction
and sex, they will gradually behave sex .
Knowledge
Based on this study, 207 (51,8%) students
have less knowledge. Knowledge give
contribution on premarital sex. Knowledge of a
person will affect his attitude then contribute to
intention for making it happen.25
Research in
Sukoharjo Junior High School found that
68.8%students have less knowledge.26
in
Surakarta only 23% have good knowledge, and
the others still in enough and low category.27
Junior high school students still have unstable
psychological and still in puberty. It is make them
easier to get trapped into unhealty sex.28
Experience is factor that influences knowledge.29
Dating experience directly will affect and impact
on the attitudes and behavior of their free sex.
Attitude about free sex influenced by several
things among other: personal experience, the
influence of others, and the influence of culture.30
Indonesian culture considers “tabu” about free
sex, the condition should ease for them to avoid
free sex. Religious education are considered
effective to prevent behavior of premarital sex.
The other factors that affect knowledge is
information. The easier information got, the better
new knowledge will somebody got. Information
obtained from formal or non-formal education can
give impact to the short-term (immediate impact)
that can change and enlarge knowledge.31
Various forms of media such as television, radio,
newspaper, magazine and others have great
influence on the establishment of opinions and
trust.
The provision of information can be
undertaken through promotion.33
Promotion
activity can be done to support teaching and
learning in schools and can be developed to
become part of the curriculum in Junior High
School. This can be manifested if there is
cooperation between the Ministry of National
Education, the Ministry of Health and the other
related division.
Pornography Acces
There are relationship between
pornography acces with premarital sex. From
4500 student of 12 big cities in Indonesia, 97
percent watched porn movie.34
In Mataram 91
percent of students exposed to the pornography.20
35
Pornography acces through internet is not
“tabu” now, the use of smartphone through Short
Message Service (SMS).36
The utilization is very
many among teenagers, Starting from doing their
tasks, communicating, doing other activities and
etc.37
Other impacts of the use of smartphone is
the delivery porn picture.38
Internet also has a role
in affecting premarital sex.14
Compared with
VCD/ DVD and the internet, mobile phone is
more simple. Pornography lover easily access and
enjoy it personally. Mobile phone provide it.
Research in USA in children (10-17 years old)
found that there are six percent who received
pornographic pictures and 28 percent transmits
that images.39
Media ease pornography acces
among teenagers. It is important for parents and
teachers to give sex education.40
Education persons and other decision
makers need to make policy and explain how
premarital sex give negative impact for student
.41.42
In sweden, the premarital sex done by fee for
among high school students reported pertaining
by the high exposure or consumption of
pornography.43
The number was even higher than
students in the United States. From 1352 students
in five Junior High Schools in USA for average
age 13 years old, reported that 27 percent of girl
and 62 percent of boy students have experience
premarital sex.44
The Pornography acces
contribute conduct masturbation.45
The use of
smartphone by students need to get serious
attention for teachers and decision makers.

Smartphone is the media that transmit
pornography most. If the use of smartphone
unavoidable, so restrictions specification mobile
phone need to do.20
Besides smartphone uses a
computer in the internet network also familiar
among teenagers. Research in Israel, internet use
very dominant (64%), just chat that result in
behavior diverge like cyberbullying and download
film.46
In this study, students who use smartphone
through SMS or MMS to stimulate sex 35,7%,
watching porn CD/VCD 44%. It indicates that the
role of this media access teenagers to expand
curiosity about sex. If there is no controll by all
sides, it will deliver tothe increasing of premarital
behavior.
Harmonious family
Harmonious family is the second factor
that has great influence towards sex premarital.
The inharmonious family is 14,309 times risk than
those who are not. One of the effects of
inharmony within families is misbehavior. One of
misbehaviour is premarital sex.47
Significant role
between harmony in family and self concept will
increase and decrease the premarital sexual
behavior.48
Research on three conditions distinct
families: inharmonious, normal family and
harmonious families. The teenagers that grew up
in inharmonious family tend to have greater risk
of mind disturbance, being naughty and take part
in anti social action.49
Teenagers who performs premarital sex
came from divorced families. Another factors of
inharmonies family is consuming alcohol. Those
who began to be alcoholic<13 years old may be
risk 2 times more to have planned sex. Then if we
see from cultural and religional aspects of
community, it is can be fine. Need further
research.50
The divorce Data in Pekanbaru 2014 is
1.700 case. Increased than 200 cases which is on
2013 only 1.500 case. Parents are expected to
maintain their marriage by participating in various
counseling to improve harmonious family. Do not
mock in front of the children..
Lifestyle
In this study, students who are categorized
asmodern lifestyle students is 60 % (240
students). Modern lifestyle is 40 % (160
student).The relationship between lifestyle with
premarital is exist, but it is insignificant. Modern
Lifestyle risk premarital sex 9,019 times than non
modern lifestyle. In other research there was no
correlation between lifestyle with the premarital
sex behavior.51
Lifestyle in the globalization
influenced by technological progress. Lifestyle
can be defined as the state of having seen porn
video. The impacts is that it can increase doing
sex, addicted, lower women‟s dignity and finally
decline the concentration, lazy to learn, and just
want to have fun.53
The lifestyle of junior high
school student in Pekanbaru is still categorized
not modern. So it does not have any impact on
premarital sex. Related data is still needed.
Peers
In this study, the percentage of peers affect
students activities is 25,5% (102 students). Risk
9,228 times to conduct premarital sex.The
teenagers who did premarital sex case in
Surakarta (64 %) and 62% mentioned the role of
their peers.There was correlation between peers
and premarital sex.54
Teenagers in Padang West
Sumatera, 16,6 % who behave risky, 4,3 % did
premarital sex.55
In Jogjakarta , 4,77% have done
premarital sex in 15 and 18 years old. They are
adopted information by their friends, without
having accurate information.11
In Banglades, 45%
of women received information about
reproductive health from peers.56
in Taheran
(34%). Research on development model
reproductive health services get 45% teenagers
get information from the peers.57
In this study the
influence their peers through the communication
like smartphone make them get information about
sex. It is important to teach religious value early.
It is also important for institutions to give
provision and teaching about how to choose good
friends and guide them to behave positively
Parents Monitoring
This study found that there is relationship
between parents control toward premarital sex
.There is significant connection between parents
monitoring with the seksual behavior.52
This study
found that sexual behavior dominated by good
sexual behavior. But if there is no proper
monitoring from the parents, could be deviate
behavior. The survey found that the majority of
Indonesia has quite bad sexual behavior, 62.7 %
teenagers are not virgin, 29 % teenagers agreed to
the premarital sex.16
Bad sexual behavior is
dominated by parents mistake. Parents did not
provide information about sex and health
reproduction. Less parents monitoring because of
less understanding about it.58
In addition
economic factors cause parents have little time to
meet their children. But in this study we did not
observe parents‟ point of view, this study focused

on junior high school students. Need further
research for this case.
Other impacts of low parents monitoring is
premarital sex. Communication and religious
education. It is a need for parents to participate in
giving health education. Cooperating with school
management and related.59 52
One of the facilities
to learn and share the experience is at “Bina
Keluarga Remaja” (BKR) in public and integrated
with PIK-R (Center of Information and
Counseling ). Routine agenda of BKR is telling
the role of parents for developing teenager, moral
view, health reproduction, drugs, HIV/AIDs,
nutritional and better life
5. CONCLUSION
This study analyzes factors that related to
premarital sex on 400 students ineleven Junior
High school at Pekanbaru Riau. This factor is
courtship status, knowledge, pornography access,
harmonious family, lifestyle, peers and parents
monitoring. Based on analysis bivariat by chy
square Test, seven factors are related with
premarital sex (P value<0.05), significant factors
is peers factor risk 4,9 times do premarital sex.
Multivariate analysis by regression logisticTest,
two factors that most influential towards
premarital sex, that are parents monitoring (POR;
20,2 times ) and harmony family (POR; 14,3
times). Suggestion: to build formation PIK-R (on
Information and counseling youth centre), to build
BKR (Family Adolescents Development)
precautionary measure an increase premarital sex
incidence.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thanks Directorate General of
Higher Education Foundation Special Fund for
Health Scientific Research. Department of
education in Pekanbaru Riau. Thanks to Dr Mitra
for his perspectives and encouragement
throughout the study as head of research and
community institutions in STIKes Hang Tuah
Pekanbaru Riau. We would like thanks to Eleven
Junior high school student in Pekanbaru Riau.
References
1. Stephenson, J., Strange, V., Forrest, S., Oakley,
A., Copas, A., Allen, E., Johnson, A. M. Pupil-led
sex education in England (RIPPLE study): cluster
randomised intervention trial. Lancet, 364.
http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16722-6
(2004)
2. Sarwono, SW. Psikologi Remaja. Raja Grafindo
Persada. Jakarta. (2006)
3. Sze, T.-M., Lin, S.-H., Hsieh, P.-J., & Chen, I.-J.
Sex Differences In The Development Of
Perceived Family Cohesion And Depressive
Symptoms In Taiwanese Adolescents.
Psychological Reports, 113(1), 54–72.
http://doi.org/10.2466/10.02.PR0.113x18z2
(2013)
4. Damanik, Hotmelia. Pengaruh Paparan Media
Internet dan Teman Sebaya Terhadap Perilaku
Seks Bebas Pada Remaja SMA XYZ tahun 2012.
Tesis. Program Studi Magister FKM USU
Medan. (2012)
5. BBKBN, Orang Tua Sebagai Sahabat Remaja,
Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencana, Jakarta
(2002)
6. PKBI. Hasil penelitian Remaja di Pekanbaru
(2008)
7. Witte, S. S., Aira, T., Tsai, L. C., Riedel, M.,
Offringa, R., Chang, M., Ssewamala, F. Efficacy
of a savings-led microfinance intervention to
reduce sexual risk for HIV among women
engaged in sex work: A randomized clinical trial.
American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), e95–
e102.http://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302291
(2015)
8. Herd, P., Higgins, J., Sicinski, K., & Merkurieva,
I. The implications of unintended pregnancies for
mental health in later life. American Journal of
Public Health, 106(3), 421–429.
http://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302973 (2016)
9. Pangkahila, A. Perilaku Seksual Remaja. Sagung
Seto. Jakarta (2005)
10. Zaltzman A,Falcon B,Harrison ME. Body Image
in Adolescent Pregnancy. North American
Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology.
(2015)
11. Sutjiningsih. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi
perilaku seksual pranikah pada remaja [Edisi
2006], Disertasi. Yogyakarta. (2006)
12. Juliani, KP. Hubungan Pengetahuan dengan Sikap
Remaja Tentang Perilaku Seksual Pranikah Pada
Siswi Kelas X Di SMA Negeri 1 Manado. Skripsi
Universitas Samratulangi Manado (2014)
13. Marlina, H. Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan
dengan Perilaku Seksual Remaja SMA Negeri Se-
Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Komunitas Kesehatan
(2012)
14. Baumgartner, S. E., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter,
J. The Influence of Descriptive and Injunctive
Peer Norms on Adolescents‟ Risky Sexual Online
Behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social
Networking, 14(12), 753–758.
http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0510 (2011)
15. Kinnaird,. Keluarga Makin Baik Hubungan
Orangtua-Remaja Makin Rendah Perilaku
Seksual Pranikah http://www.kr.co.id/ Diakses
pada Tanggal 6 Januari 2009. (2003)

16. Faradilah, I.. Perempuan. Jakarta: TransMedia
(2013)
17. Iwan,. Masturbasi. Yogyakarta: C.V Andi offset.
(2012)
18. Setiawati D. (2010). Persepsi Remaja Mengenai
Pendidikan Seks: Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif pada
Pelajar SMA Negeri 4 Magelang. Surakarta :
Universitas Sebelas Maret (2010)
19. Husein, S. Variabel – Variabel Yang
Mempengaruhi Seks Bebas (Free Sex) (Studi
Kasus Pada Remaja Di Desa Benua Baru
Kecamatan Muara Bengkal Kabupaten Kutai
Timur. eJournal Sosiatri-Sosiologi 2015, 3 (4):
86-97 ISSN 0000-0000, ejournal.sos.fisip-
unmul.ac.id (2015)
20. Mariani, A dan Bachtiar, I Keterpaparan Materi
Pornografi Dan Perilaku Seksual Siswa Sekolah
Menengah Pertama Negeri.Makara, Sosial
Humaniora, Vol. 14, No. 2, Desember 2010: 83-
90 (2010)
21. Dwi A. RU. Hubungan Sikap Remaja dengan
Prilaku Seks Bebas. Surakarta: UNS (2009)
22. Damanik, Hotmelia. Pengaruh Paparan Media
Internet dan Teman Sebaya Terhadap Perilaku
Seks Bebas Pada Remaja SMA XYZ tahun 2012.
Tesis. Program Studi Magister FKM USU
Medan. (2012)
23. Erni Pendidikan Seks Pada RemajaJurnal Health
Quality Vol. 3 No. 2 Mei 2013,Hal. 69-140
Poltekkes Kemenkes Jakarta I (2013).
24. Healy. N Collection of True, Tortured, Wild,
Hilarious, Concise, and Intense Tales of Teenage
Life Capstone/Switch Press, ISBN 978-1-63079-
012-7Diunduh 22 Mei 2016 (2013)
25. Suryoputro A, Ford NJ, Shaluhiyah Z. Faktor
faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku seksual
remaja di Jawa Tengah : Implikasinya terhadap
kebijakan dan layanan kesehatan seksual dan
reproduksi. Semarang: UNDIP (2006)
26. Bakti, P.M dan Muliawati, S. Pengetahuan, Sikap
dan Perilaku Seks Bebas Pada Remaja Di SMP
Negeri 1 Sukoharjo, Jurnal Infokes, Vol.4 No.2 .
ISSN: 2086 – 2628 (2014)
27. Noviyanti, L.D Tingkat Pengetahuan Remaja di
SMP 18 Surakarta, Karya Tulis Ilmiah, STIKes
Kusuma Husada,Surakarta (2015)
28. Chronika R. Makna Seks Bebas Bagi Pelajar
SMP di Kota Padang. Padang: Universitas
Andalas (2011)
29. Notoadmodjo S, Promosi kesehatan: Teori dan
aplikasinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. (2007)
30. Azwar S. Sikap Manusia Teori dan
Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Mulia
(2011)
31. Mubarak, W.I. Promosi Kesehatan untuk
Kebidanan. Jakarta: Salemba Medika (2012)
32. Benita, N.R. Pengaruh Penyuluhan Terhadap
Tingkat Pengetahuan Kesehatan Reproduksi Pada
Remaja Siswa SMP Kristen Gergaji. Program
Pendidikan Sarjana Kedokteran Fakultas
Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro (2012)
33. Shahlani, Nazmaturrahmah. Pengaruh Penyuluhan
terhadap Pengetahuan Tentang Perilaku Sek Pada Siswa
Siswi Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 5 Banjarmasin Tahun
2011. Jurnal Vol 05.No 05 Edisi 23 Januari (2011)
34. Gatra (2009, 2 Maret). Pornografi rusak jaringan
otak. Diunduh 31 Maret 2009 dari
http://www.gatra.com/2009-03-02 (2009)
35. Supriati&Fikawati.EfekPaparanPornografiPadaRe
majaSMPNegeri
KotaPontianakTahun2008.Jurnal.Makara,SosialH
umaniora,Vol.13,No1:pp48-56. (2009)
36. Walrave M, Heirman, W,. Hallam.L Under
pressure to sext? Applying the theory of planned
behaviour to adolescent sexting. Department of
Communication Studies – MIOS, University of
Antwerp, Sint Jacobstraat 2, Antwerp 2000,
Belgium. Behaviour & Information Technology,
2014 Vol. 33, No. 1, 85–97,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.
837099 (2014)
37. Lenhart, A., et al,. Teens and mobile phones.
Washington, DC: Pew. (2010)
38. Mitchell, K.J., et al., Prevalence and
characteristics of youth sexting: a national study.
Pediatrics, 129 (1), 13–20. (2012)
39. Temple, J.R., et al., Teen sexting and its
association with sexual behaviors. Archives of
Pediatrics and AdolescentMedicine, 166 (9), 828–
833. Diunduh 22 Mei 2011 (2012)
40. Dake, J.A., et al., Prevalence And Correlates Of
Sexting Behavior In Adolescents. American
Journal of SexualityEducation, 7 (1), 1–15.
Diunduh 22 Mei 2016 (2012)
41. Lippman, J.R. and Campbell, S.W., Teenagers
and sexting: perceived norms and sexual double
standard. ICAConference, 24–28 May 2012,
Phoenix, AZ. (2012)
42. Ringrose, J., et al.,. A Qualitative Study Of
Children, Young People And „Sexting‟: A Report
Prepared For The NSPCC.London: NSPCC.
(2012)
43. Svedin, C.G. & Priebe, G. Selling sex in a
population-based study of High School Seniors in
Sweden: demographic and psychosocial
correlates. Archive of Sexual Behavior, 36, 21–
32. (2007)
44. Aten, M.J., Siegel, D.M., Enaharo, M., &
Auinger, P. Keeping Middle School Students
Abstinent: Outcomes Of A Primary Prevention
Intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31,
70-78. (2002)
45. Sunarsih, S., Purwanti S dan Khosidah,. A (2010)
Hubungan Frekuensi Paparan Media Pornografi
Dengan Frekuensi Perilaku Masturbasi Remaja
Putra Di SMK Wongsorejo Gombong
Kebumen.Jurnal Ilmiah Kebidanan, Vol. 1 No. 1
Edisi Desember (2010)
46. Bouhnik, D. Gender Differences in the Moral
Judgment and Behavior of Israeli Adolescents in
the Internet Environment. Journal Of The
Association For Information Science And

Technology, 65(3):551–559, diunduh 22 Mei
2016. (2014)
47. Kartono, K. Kenakalan Remaja. Jakarta:
Rajawali Pers. Diunduh 19 Mei 2016 (2013)
48. Qasanah, U (2012) Peran Keharmonisan Keluarga
Dan Konsep Diri Terhadap Perilaku Seksual
Pranikah Remaja Putri, Program Pasca Sarjana
Universitas Muhammadiyah SurakartaTesis. Di
akses 22 Mei 2016
49. Hawari, D. Alquran Ilmu Kedokteran Jiwa dan
Kesehatan Mental. Jakarta: Dana Bhakti Yasa.
(1997)
50. Hingson, R., Timothy H., Michael R.,Henry W.
Early Age of First Drunkenness as a factor in
College Students‟ Unplanned and Unprotected
Sex Attributable to Drinking, Pediatrics, vol 111,
no 1:34-41. (2003)
51. Banun, FOS. Faktor-faktor yang Berhubungan
dengan Perilaku Seksual Pranikah Pada
Mahasiswa Semester V STIKes X Jakarta Timur.
Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Vol 5 No 1.Jakarta
(2012)
52. Huebner, A.J.; Howell, L.W. Examining the
Relationship between Adolescent Sexual Risk-
Taking and Perceptions of Monitoring,
Communication, and Parenting Styles. Journal of
Adolescent Health, 33(2):71-78 (2007)
53. Nuryani Dan Pratami (2011) Hubungan
Keterpaparan Media Informasi Tentang Seks
Dengan Perilaku Seks Remaja Awal Pada Siswa
Di SMP Semarang. Dinamika Kebidanan, vol.1
no.2. Agustus 2011.Diakses 22 Mei 2016
54. Maryatun, Peran Teman Sebaya Terhadap
Perilaku Seksual Pra Nikah Pada Remaja Di SMA
Muhammadiyah 3 Surakarta, Gaster Vol. 10 No.
1 Februari 2013,
55. Nursal, Dien Gusta Anggraini. Faktor - faktor
yang berhubungan dengan perilaku seksual murid
SMU negeri di Kota Padang Tahun 2007. Jumal
Kesehatan Masyarakat No.02/Maret-September
(2008)
56. Bhuiya, et al. Reproductive Health Services For
Adolescents Recent Experiences From A Pilot
Project In Bangladesh. Bangladesh. Di akses 29
Mei 2016. (2006)
57. Mohamadi, et al. Reproductive knowledge
attitudes and behaviour among adolescent males
in Teheran, Iran [Edisi 2006], Inter Fam Pan
Perspect;32(l):35-44 (2006)
58. BPS, Persentase Penduduk Berumur 10 Tahun
Ke Atas menurut Ijazah Tertinggi. Diakses 27
Mei 2016. (2013).
59. Salisa, Perilaku Seks Pra-Nikah Dikalangan
Remaja Kota Surakarta Tahun 2010. Skripsi
Surakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Sosilogi Universitas
Sebelas Maret. (2010)

Premarital sex adolencents at junior high school

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Similar to Premarital sex adolencents at junior high school

Similar to Premarital sex adolencents at junior high school (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Premarital sex adolencents at junior high school