SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 25
Pragmatic Markers
By :
Zahra Aamir Kamil.
The term ‘pragmatic marker’ has emerged in the last 20 to 25 years
to describe items such as well, you know, like and I mean, expressions
which may have little obvious propositional meaning but which oil the
wheels of conversational social interaction. Fundamental to oral
fluency, pragmatic markers facilitate the flow of spontaneous,
interactional and social conversation. Variously termed ‘hedges’,
‘fumbles’ and ‘conversational greasers’ (Beeching, 2016).
Pragmatic markers comprise a functional class of linguistic items
that do not typically change the propositional meaning of an
utterance but are essential for the organization and structuring of
discourse, for marking the speaker’s attitudes to the proposition
being expressed as well as for facilitating processes of pragmatic
inferences. Thus, a word or expression that is considered a pragmatic
marker in some contexts may not be considered a pragmatic marker
in other contexts, as illustrated by the following examples from the
source text:
(1) He speaks English very well.
(2) Well, he is good at English.
In (1), well is used as an adverb and serves a semantic function. while well in
(2) does not change the meaning of the utterance, it serves a pragmatic
function in the sense of marking the speaker’s attitude to the rest of the
utterance (Fischer, 2006; Furkó, 2007).
 Pragmatic markers are polyfunctional cues that predicate changes in the
speaker’s cognition, attitudes, and beliefs and facilitate the transmission
of illocutionary force and intentions.
 They are a feature of oral rather than written discourse.
 The speaker makes use of them to organize, recover, reformulate and
segment the information provided to the hearer.
 They are drawn mainly from the class of adverbials, conjunctions and
prepositional phrases (González, 2004)
Functions of pragmatic markers in conversation
Pragmatic markers are most frequent in the spoken language and are a fundamental
part of oral fluency. There are five main ways in which the particular characteristics of
conversation are reflected in the usages made of pragmatic markers.
1. Conversation is spontaneous and takes place at speed; unlike writing, there is no
opportunity for speakers to edit what they say before ‘publication pragmatic markers
allow for hesitation, back-tracking, repair and repetition.
2. Conversation is interactional; pragmatic markers occur at the junction between
speakers in turn-taking, frequently in utterance-initial or utterance- final positions.
3. Conversation is social; pragmatic markers may be sociolinguistically marked (used in
particular regions, by speakers of particular age-groups or particular social groups).
4. Conversation is sociable; pragmatic markers are often associated with naturalness,
friendliness and warmth. In addition, they are often addressee oriented: they allow the
addressee's opinion to be enjoined or invoked.
5. Conversation is polite; pragmatic markers can be a hedge talk, down toning what might
be considered over-strong assertions of opinion.
Types of pragmatic markers
Basic Markers
Basic markers have representational meaning which means they
contribute conceptual information over and above that of the propositional
meaning. The basic markers are subdivided into the following:
A. Structural basic markers
B. Lexical basic markers.
C. Hybrid basic markers
A. Structural Basic Markers
The first and most general of the basic markers is the syntactic structure of the
sentence itself, its mood. Except for some idiomatic structures, every English
sentence falls into one of three syntactic types (declarative, imperative, or
interrogative) and each type signals a general force for the basic message.
a. The declarative structure signals the expression of belief by the speaker
that the sentence propositional content represents (or did, or will
represent) a true state of the world.
e.g. : John slid down the slope.
The action desired may be verbal, as in (a), or non-verbal, as in (b).
a) Tell me the answer.
b) Bring that book over here.
b. The imperative structure signals the speaker’s expression of
desire that the addressee bring about the state of the world described
in the propositional content.
B. Lexical Basic Markers
There are many lexical basic pragmatic markers. They can be analyzed into
two major groups:
1. Performative Expressions
These canonical performative expressions contain a first-person singular
subject, in some cases an object you, and a verb in the non-negative
present tense which denotes a propositional attitude specifying the
speaker’s view towards the following proposition.
Examples:
a) I promise that I will be there on time.
b) I (hereby) apologize for running over your cat.
c) I (hereby) request that you stay just a bit longer
Pragmatic Idioms
In addition to the standardized forms, there are pragmatic idioms, expressions for which
there is no plausible inferential path leading from literal, direct meaning to the accepted
basic pragmatic signal.
There are two types of idioms:
a) Force idioms, which signal the intended basic message force such as please (kindly)
and perhaps (maybe):
 Can you please help me? (Request)
 Perhaps you should sit down and rest a bit. (suggestion)
 How about going? (suggestion)
 Long live the Queen. (wish)
b) Message idioms, which signal the entire basic message.
 Get a horse. [Directive to hurry up]
 Where’s the fire. [Challenge for necessity of speed]
 I smell a rat. [Claim that all is not well]
C. Hybrid Basic Markers
To this point, the basic pragmatic markers discussed have been either
structural (e.g., the declarative structure) or lexical (e.g., performative
expressions). There are, however, a number of markers which involve a
specific structure in combination with certain lexical conditions, what I will
call a “hybrid basic marker.” There are three general types: declarative-based,
interrogative-based, and imperative-based.
1. Declarative-based Hybrids
A declarative followed by a sentence-final interrogative tag.
 John saw Mary, didn’t he?
 John didn’t see Mary, did he?
2. Interrogative-based Hybrids
a) Can (could/can’t/couldn’t) you do that?
b) Will (would/won’t/wouldn’t) you do that?
3. Imperative-based Hybrids
a) Talk, or I’ll shoot. (If you don’t talk, I’ll shoot.)
b) Don’t smile, or I’ll clobber you. (If you smile, I’ll clobber you.)
 Commentary Pragmatic Markers
Commentary markers are lexical expressions, which have both a representational
meaning specifying an entire message, and a procedural meaning signaling that this
message is to function as a comment on some aspect of the basic message.
They are of six types:
1. Assessment markers
Assessment markers signal the speaker’s evaluation of the state of the world represented in
the proposition. It delivers the basic message, and the comment.
- Sadly, Mary arrived 5 minutes too late to meet the deadline.
These assessment markers, primarily adverbs, may include:
Amazingly, amusingly, annoyingly, appropriately, astonishingly, etc.
2. Manner-of-speaking markers
Markers with which the speaker can signal a comment on the manner in
which the basic message is being conveyed.
- Bluntly, how are you going to get him off the hook?
Adverbials falling into this group can include the following,
Bluntly, candidly, confidentially, crudely, fairly, frankly, generally, etc
3. Evidential markers
These markers signal the degree of confidence, positive or negative,
weakly or strongly, held by the speaker about the truth of the basic
message.
- Indeed, I promise to be on time.
Evidential markers can include the following:
Assuredly, clearly, conceivably, decidedly, definitely, doubtless, etc.
4. Hearsay markers
Hearsay markers are comments about the type of source of the speaker’s
information.
- It is claimed that Susan did not kill the two boys.
The class includes:
Allegedly, I have heard, it appears, it is reported, it is rumored, one hears,
purportedly, reportedly, etc.
5. Mitigation markers
This marker signals the speaker’s desire to reduce the face loss associated with the basic
message. (Brown & Levinson, 1988; Fraser, 1991).
There is a number of varieties listed under this type of markers, two are mentioned below:
1. The pseudo-conditionals: Despite their appearance, these are not conditional sentences.
Rather, they constitute a basic message with a mitigating comment on it.
- If it’s not too much trouble, could you help me?
2. Expressions ending with but: The basic message that follows these mitigation markers, is
typically disadvantageous to the addressee and thus susceptible to mitigation.
- You are, of course, entitled to your own opinion, but are you sure that’s a safe thing to do?
6. Emphasis markers
These markers have the function of emphasizing the force of the basic message.
- Mark my words: Sam will end up in jail.
This group is illustrated by expressions such as,
By no means, by no stretch of the imagination, definitely, DO VP, I cannot too
often point out that, I emphasize (strongly) that, I insist that, etc.
Parallel Pragmatic Markers
The third type of pragmatic marker is the parallel marker, whose function is to signal an
entire message in addition to the basic message.
Four types can be viewed:
A. Vocative markers
By using one of these vocative forms, the speaker is explicitly sending the message that the
addressee of this message is exactly whom was called.
- Waiter, please bring me another fork.
This group contains the vocatives, which include:
Standard Titles: John, Mr. President, Colonel, Mom, Your Honor, Father
Occupation Name: waiter, doctor, nurse, driver, judge
General Nouns: brother, boys, guys, ladies and gentlemen, man, young lady
Pronominal Forms: you, somebody, everyone, anyone.
B) Speaker displeasure markers
These markers signals the speaker’s displeasure.
- Where in blue blazes is that young son of mine; it’s already 3 am.
This group of markers includes
Damn well, for the love of God, how many times have I told you, right now, the heck, etc.
c. Solidarity markers
These markers signals solidarity or lack thereof.
- As one guy to another, we’re in deep trouble.
- My friend, we simply have to get our act together and face this problem.
- As your superior, I am authorized to tell you that you have been selected
to go.
- Look, birdbrain, this has been sitting in the “in box” for over a week.
- What’s the story?
Focusing markers
These markers signals focusing or refocusing on the topic at hand.
- He can’t go. Y’see, he isn’t feeling well.
Included in this group are:
Alright, here, listen, look (here), now, so, well, y’see

More Related Content

What's hot

speech act theory in semantics
speech act theory in semanticsspeech act theory in semantics
speech act theory in semanticsAseel K. Mahmood
 
Speech act assignment
Speech act assignmentSpeech act assignment
Speech act assignmentZainab Amjad
 
Politeness - Pragmatic
Politeness - PragmaticPoliteness - Pragmatic
Politeness - PragmaticLucia Pratama
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysisAyesha Mir
 
Lecture 3 implicature
Lecture  3 implicatureLecture  3 implicature
Lecture 3 implicatureAdel Thamery
 
06 speech act and event for students
06 speech act and event for students06 speech act and event for students
06 speech act and event for studentsgadis pratiwi
 
Pragmatics - George Yule
Pragmatics - George YulePragmatics - George Yule
Pragmatics - George YuleAnthony Salinas
 
Cooperation And Implicature By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
Cooperation And Implicature By Dr.Shadia.PptxCooperation And Implicature By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
Cooperation And Implicature By Dr.Shadia.PptxDr. Shadia Banjar
 
pragmatics speech act theory promises, felicity conditions
pragmatics speech act theory promises, felicity conditionspragmatics speech act theory promises, felicity conditions
pragmatics speech act theory promises, felicity conditionsSajid Ali
 
The Politeness Principle by Lakoff - AS English Language
The Politeness Principle by Lakoff - AS English LanguageThe Politeness Principle by Lakoff - AS English Language
The Politeness Principle by Lakoff - AS English LanguageALevelLife
 
Teun van dijk
Teun van dijkTeun van dijk
Teun van dijkvalen1502
 
Two Views of Discourse Structure: As a Product and As a Process
Two Views of Discourse Structure: As a Product and As a ProcessTwo Views of Discourse Structure: As a Product and As a Process
Two Views of Discourse Structure: As a Product and As a ProcessCRISALDO CORDURA
 
Discourse structure as process
Discourse structure as processDiscourse structure as process
Discourse structure as processdyta maykasari
 
Discourse structure chapter 4 by Ahmet YUSUF
Discourse structure chapter 4 by Ahmet YUSUFDiscourse structure chapter 4 by Ahmet YUSUF
Discourse structure chapter 4 by Ahmet YUSUFأحمد يوسف
 
Coherence in the interpretation of discourse
Coherence  in the interpretation of discourse Coherence  in the interpretation of discourse
Coherence in the interpretation of discourse H. R. Marasabessy
 

What's hot (20)

speech act theory in semantics
speech act theory in semanticsspeech act theory in semantics
speech act theory in semantics
 
Speech act assignment
Speech act assignmentSpeech act assignment
Speech act assignment
 
Speech act theory
Speech act theorySpeech act theory
Speech act theory
 
Politeness - Pragmatic
Politeness - PragmaticPoliteness - Pragmatic
Politeness - Pragmatic
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
 
Lecture 3 implicature
Lecture  3 implicatureLecture  3 implicature
Lecture 3 implicature
 
06 speech act and event for students
06 speech act and event for students06 speech act and event for students
06 speech act and event for students
 
Pragmatics (Speech Acts)
Pragmatics (Speech Acts)Pragmatics (Speech Acts)
Pragmatics (Speech Acts)
 
Pragmatics - George Yule
Pragmatics - George YulePragmatics - George Yule
Pragmatics - George Yule
 
2 l2 spoken&written-discourse
2 l2 spoken&written-discourse2 l2 spoken&written-discourse
2 l2 spoken&written-discourse
 
Cooperation And Implicature By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
Cooperation And Implicature By Dr.Shadia.PptxCooperation And Implicature By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
Cooperation And Implicature By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
 
pragmatics speech act theory promises, felicity conditions
pragmatics speech act theory promises, felicity conditionspragmatics speech act theory promises, felicity conditions
pragmatics speech act theory promises, felicity conditions
 
The Politeness Principle by Lakoff - AS English Language
The Politeness Principle by Lakoff - AS English LanguageThe Politeness Principle by Lakoff - AS English Language
The Politeness Principle by Lakoff - AS English Language
 
Conversational Structure
Conversational StructureConversational Structure
Conversational Structure
 
Implicature
ImplicatureImplicature
Implicature
 
Teun van dijk
Teun van dijkTeun van dijk
Teun van dijk
 
Two Views of Discourse Structure: As a Product and As a Process
Two Views of Discourse Structure: As a Product and As a ProcessTwo Views of Discourse Structure: As a Product and As a Process
Two Views of Discourse Structure: As a Product and As a Process
 
Discourse structure as process
Discourse structure as processDiscourse structure as process
Discourse structure as process
 
Discourse structure chapter 4 by Ahmet YUSUF
Discourse structure chapter 4 by Ahmet YUSUFDiscourse structure chapter 4 by Ahmet YUSUF
Discourse structure chapter 4 by Ahmet YUSUF
 
Coherence in the interpretation of discourse
Coherence  in the interpretation of discourse Coherence  in the interpretation of discourse
Coherence in the interpretation of discourse
 

Similar to Pragmatic Markers.

Discourse analysis-1225482185740463-9
Discourse analysis-1225482185740463-9Discourse analysis-1225482185740463-9
Discourse analysis-1225482185740463-9Victor Canoy
 
Approaches to discoourse analysis
Approaches to discoourse analysisApproaches to discoourse analysis
Approaches to discoourse analysisDuaa Ahmed
 
Speech acts theory in sociolinguistics
Speech acts theory in sociolinguistics Speech acts theory in sociolinguistics
Speech acts theory in sociolinguistics Aseel K. Mahmood
 
SPEECH ACTS.pptx
SPEECH ACTS.pptxSPEECH ACTS.pptx
SPEECH ACTS.pptxSTUTIKHARE8
 
Pedagogical implication of ca
Pedagogical implication of caPedagogical implication of ca
Pedagogical implication of caSajedah Ajlouni
 
Discourse Analysis (Linguistic 101)
Discourse Analysis (Linguistic 101)Discourse Analysis (Linguistic 101)
Discourse Analysis (Linguistic 101)Rain Thorvaldsen
 
Pragmatics and Discourse , context & speech acts
Pragmatics and Discourse , context & speech actsPragmatics and Discourse , context & speech acts
Pragmatics and Discourse , context & speech actsNaeemIqbal88
 
Speaking and pronunciation
Speaking and pronunciationSpeaking and pronunciation
Speaking and pronunciationVivaAs
 
Discourse_Analysis.pptx
Discourse_Analysis.pptxDiscourse_Analysis.pptx
Discourse_Analysis.pptxEzekielAnselm
 
Copy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Copy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss RabiaCopy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Copy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss RabiaDr. Cupid Lucid
 
Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss RabiaDiscourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss RabiaDr. Cupid Lucid
 
Copy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Copy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss RabiaCopy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Copy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss RabiaDr. Cupid Lucid
 
Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss RabiaDiscourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss RabiaDr. Cupid Lucid
 
Canons of Rhetoric Speech AnalysisSo what are the characteristi.docx
Canons of Rhetoric Speech AnalysisSo what are the characteristi.docxCanons of Rhetoric Speech AnalysisSo what are the characteristi.docx
Canons of Rhetoric Speech AnalysisSo what are the characteristi.docxhacksoni
 

Similar to Pragmatic Markers. (20)

Discourse analysis-1225482185740463-9
Discourse analysis-1225482185740463-9Discourse analysis-1225482185740463-9
Discourse analysis-1225482185740463-9
 
Approaches to discoourse analysis
Approaches to discoourse analysisApproaches to discoourse analysis
Approaches to discoourse analysis
 
Speech acts theory in sociolinguistics
Speech acts theory in sociolinguistics Speech acts theory in sociolinguistics
Speech acts theory in sociolinguistics
 
SPEECH ACTS.pptx
SPEECH ACTS.pptxSPEECH ACTS.pptx
SPEECH ACTS.pptx
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
 
Pragmatics
PragmaticsPragmatics
Pragmatics
 
Pedagogical implication of ca
Pedagogical implication of caPedagogical implication of ca
Pedagogical implication of ca
 
Discourse Analysis (Linguistic 101)
Discourse Analysis (Linguistic 101)Discourse Analysis (Linguistic 101)
Discourse Analysis (Linguistic 101)
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
 
Pragmatics and Discourse , context & speech acts
Pragmatics and Discourse , context & speech actsPragmatics and Discourse , context & speech acts
Pragmatics and Discourse , context & speech acts
 
Speaking and pronunciation
Speaking and pronunciationSpeaking and pronunciation
Speaking and pronunciation
 
Discourse Analysis
Discourse AnalysisDiscourse Analysis
Discourse Analysis
 
Discourse Analysis
Discourse AnalysisDiscourse Analysis
Discourse Analysis
 
Discourse_Analysis.pptx
Discourse_Analysis.pptxDiscourse_Analysis.pptx
Discourse_Analysis.pptx
 
Copy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Copy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss RabiaCopy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Copy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
 
Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss RabiaDiscourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
 
Copy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Copy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss RabiaCopy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Copy Of Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
 
Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss RabiaDiscourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
Discourse Analysis Presented To Miss Rabia
 
Canons of Rhetoric Speech AnalysisSo what are the characteristi.docx
Canons of Rhetoric Speech AnalysisSo what are the characteristi.docxCanons of Rhetoric Speech AnalysisSo what are the characteristi.docx
Canons of Rhetoric Speech AnalysisSo what are the characteristi.docx
 
Pragmatic
PragmaticPragmatic
Pragmatic
 

More from zahraa Aamir

Social Influences On Second Language Learning ( Applied Linguistics)
Social Influences On Second Language Learning ( Applied Linguistics)Social Influences On Second Language Learning ( Applied Linguistics)
Social Influences On Second Language Learning ( Applied Linguistics)zahraa Aamir
 
The universalty of human Language(Chapter 2)
The universalty of human Language(Chapter 2)The universalty of human Language(Chapter 2)
The universalty of human Language(Chapter 2)zahraa Aamir
 
Speech_communities_,social_&rejional_variation
Speech_communities_,social_&rejional_variationSpeech_communities_,social_&rejional_variation
Speech_communities_,social_&rejional_variationzahraa Aamir
 
CONTRASTIVEV ANALYSIS CHAPTER 1.
CONTRASTIVEV ANALYSIS CHAPTER 1.CONTRASTIVEV ANALYSIS CHAPTER 1.
CONTRASTIVEV ANALYSIS CHAPTER 1.zahraa Aamir
 
Microliguistic contrastive analysis.
Microliguistic contrastive analysis.Microliguistic contrastive analysis.
Microliguistic contrastive analysis.zahraa Aamir
 
The Linguistic Components of Contrastive Analysis
The Linguistic Components ofContrastive AnalysisThe Linguistic Components ofContrastive Analysis
The Linguistic Components of Contrastive Analysiszahraa Aamir
 
The Psychological Basis of Contrastive Analysis
The Psychological Basis  of  Contrastive Analysis The Psychological Basis  of  Contrastive Analysis
The Psychological Basis of Contrastive Analysis zahraa Aamir
 
Adjectives in Arabic &English language.pptx
Adjectives in Arabic &English language.pptxAdjectives in Arabic &English language.pptx
Adjectives in Arabic &English language.pptxzahraa Aamir
 
Macrolinguistics & Contrastive Analysis
Macrolinguistics & Contrastive AnalysisMacrolinguistics & Contrastive Analysis
Macrolinguistics & Contrastive Analysiszahraa Aamir
 
Pedagogical Exploitation of Contrastive Analysis
Pedagogical Exploitation of Contrastive AnalysisPedagogical Exploitation of Contrastive Analysis
Pedagogical Exploitation of Contrastive Analysiszahraa Aamir
 
Some Issues of Contention.
Some Issues of Contention.Some Issues of Contention.
Some Issues of Contention.zahraa Aamir
 
Contrastive Analysis & Errors Analysis
Contrastive Analysis& Errors Analysis Contrastive Analysis& Errors Analysis
Contrastive Analysis & Errors Analysis zahraa Aamir
 
Research questions & hypotheses,Qualitative ,Quantitative and mixed methods
Research questions & hypotheses,Qualitative ,Quantitative and mixed methodsResearch questions & hypotheses,Qualitative ,Quantitative and mixed methods
Research questions & hypotheses,Qualitative ,Quantitative and mixed methodszahraa Aamir
 
The selection of a research design
The selection of a research designThe selection of a research design
The selection of a research designzahraa Aamir
 
Mechanics of style
Mechanics of style Mechanics of style
Mechanics of style zahraa Aamir
 
Quantitative Method
Quantitative MethodQuantitative Method
Quantitative Methodzahraa Aamir
 
Conceptual Catigories
Conceptual CatigoriesConceptual Catigories
Conceptual Catigorieszahraa Aamir
 

More from zahraa Aamir (20)

Social Influences On Second Language Learning ( Applied Linguistics)
Social Influences On Second Language Learning ( Applied Linguistics)Social Influences On Second Language Learning ( Applied Linguistics)
Social Influences On Second Language Learning ( Applied Linguistics)
 
The universalty of human Language(Chapter 2)
The universalty of human Language(Chapter 2)The universalty of human Language(Chapter 2)
The universalty of human Language(Chapter 2)
 
Speech_communities_,social_&rejional_variation
Speech_communities_,social_&rejional_variationSpeech_communities_,social_&rejional_variation
Speech_communities_,social_&rejional_variation
 
color & Kinship
color & Kinshipcolor & Kinship
color & Kinship
 
CONTRASTIVEV ANALYSIS CHAPTER 1.
CONTRASTIVEV ANALYSIS CHAPTER 1.CONTRASTIVEV ANALYSIS CHAPTER 1.
CONTRASTIVEV ANALYSIS CHAPTER 1.
 
Microliguistic contrastive analysis.
Microliguistic contrastive analysis.Microliguistic contrastive analysis.
Microliguistic contrastive analysis.
 
The Linguistic Components of Contrastive Analysis
The Linguistic Components ofContrastive AnalysisThe Linguistic Components ofContrastive Analysis
The Linguistic Components of Contrastive Analysis
 
The Psychological Basis of Contrastive Analysis
The Psychological Basis  of  Contrastive Analysis The Psychological Basis  of  Contrastive Analysis
The Psychological Basis of Contrastive Analysis
 
Adjectives in Arabic &English language.pptx
Adjectives in Arabic &English language.pptxAdjectives in Arabic &English language.pptx
Adjectives in Arabic &English language.pptx
 
Macrolinguistics & Contrastive Analysis
Macrolinguistics & Contrastive AnalysisMacrolinguistics & Contrastive Analysis
Macrolinguistics & Contrastive Analysis
 
Pedagogical Exploitation of Contrastive Analysis
Pedagogical Exploitation of Contrastive AnalysisPedagogical Exploitation of Contrastive Analysis
Pedagogical Exploitation of Contrastive Analysis
 
Some Issues of Contention.
Some Issues of Contention.Some Issues of Contention.
Some Issues of Contention.
 
Contrastive Analysis & Errors Analysis
Contrastive Analysis& Errors Analysis Contrastive Analysis& Errors Analysis
Contrastive Analysis & Errors Analysis
 
Research questions & hypotheses,Qualitative ,Quantitative and mixed methods
Research questions & hypotheses,Qualitative ,Quantitative and mixed methodsResearch questions & hypotheses,Qualitative ,Quantitative and mixed methods
Research questions & hypotheses,Qualitative ,Quantitative and mixed methods
 
The selection of a research design
The selection of a research designThe selection of a research design
The selection of a research design
 
Mechanics of style
Mechanics of style Mechanics of style
Mechanics of style
 
Quantitative Method
Quantitative MethodQuantitative Method
Quantitative Method
 
MLA VS APA.
MLA VS APA.MLA VS APA.
MLA VS APA.
 
Adjectives.
Adjectives.Adjectives.
Adjectives.
 
Conceptual Catigories
Conceptual CatigoriesConceptual Catigories
Conceptual Catigories
 

Recently uploaded

BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfSoniaTolstoy
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionSafetyChain Software
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationnomboosow
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfciinovamais
 
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdfDisha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdfchloefrazer622
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docxPoojaSen20
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3JemimahLaneBuaron
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104misteraugie
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactPECB
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfchloefrazer622
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesFatimaKhan178732
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...anjaliyadav012327
 

Recently uploaded (20)

BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdfDisha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docx
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
 
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
 

Pragmatic Markers.

  • 2. The term ‘pragmatic marker’ has emerged in the last 20 to 25 years to describe items such as well, you know, like and I mean, expressions which may have little obvious propositional meaning but which oil the wheels of conversational social interaction. Fundamental to oral fluency, pragmatic markers facilitate the flow of spontaneous, interactional and social conversation. Variously termed ‘hedges’, ‘fumbles’ and ‘conversational greasers’ (Beeching, 2016).
  • 3. Pragmatic markers comprise a functional class of linguistic items that do not typically change the propositional meaning of an utterance but are essential for the organization and structuring of discourse, for marking the speaker’s attitudes to the proposition being expressed as well as for facilitating processes of pragmatic inferences. Thus, a word or expression that is considered a pragmatic marker in some contexts may not be considered a pragmatic marker in other contexts, as illustrated by the following examples from the source text:
  • 4. (1) He speaks English very well. (2) Well, he is good at English. In (1), well is used as an adverb and serves a semantic function. while well in (2) does not change the meaning of the utterance, it serves a pragmatic function in the sense of marking the speaker’s attitude to the rest of the utterance (Fischer, 2006; Furkó, 2007).
  • 5.  Pragmatic markers are polyfunctional cues that predicate changes in the speaker’s cognition, attitudes, and beliefs and facilitate the transmission of illocutionary force and intentions.  They are a feature of oral rather than written discourse.  The speaker makes use of them to organize, recover, reformulate and segment the information provided to the hearer.  They are drawn mainly from the class of adverbials, conjunctions and prepositional phrases (González, 2004)
  • 6. Functions of pragmatic markers in conversation Pragmatic markers are most frequent in the spoken language and are a fundamental part of oral fluency. There are five main ways in which the particular characteristics of conversation are reflected in the usages made of pragmatic markers. 1. Conversation is spontaneous and takes place at speed; unlike writing, there is no opportunity for speakers to edit what they say before ‘publication pragmatic markers allow for hesitation, back-tracking, repair and repetition. 2. Conversation is interactional; pragmatic markers occur at the junction between speakers in turn-taking, frequently in utterance-initial or utterance- final positions.
  • 7. 3. Conversation is social; pragmatic markers may be sociolinguistically marked (used in particular regions, by speakers of particular age-groups or particular social groups). 4. Conversation is sociable; pragmatic markers are often associated with naturalness, friendliness and warmth. In addition, they are often addressee oriented: they allow the addressee's opinion to be enjoined or invoked. 5. Conversation is polite; pragmatic markers can be a hedge talk, down toning what might be considered over-strong assertions of opinion.
  • 8. Types of pragmatic markers Basic Markers Basic markers have representational meaning which means they contribute conceptual information over and above that of the propositional meaning. The basic markers are subdivided into the following: A. Structural basic markers B. Lexical basic markers. C. Hybrid basic markers
  • 9. A. Structural Basic Markers The first and most general of the basic markers is the syntactic structure of the sentence itself, its mood. Except for some idiomatic structures, every English sentence falls into one of three syntactic types (declarative, imperative, or interrogative) and each type signals a general force for the basic message. a. The declarative structure signals the expression of belief by the speaker that the sentence propositional content represents (or did, or will represent) a true state of the world. e.g. : John slid down the slope.
  • 10. The action desired may be verbal, as in (a), or non-verbal, as in (b). a) Tell me the answer. b) Bring that book over here. b. The imperative structure signals the speaker’s expression of desire that the addressee bring about the state of the world described in the propositional content.
  • 11. B. Lexical Basic Markers There are many lexical basic pragmatic markers. They can be analyzed into two major groups: 1. Performative Expressions These canonical performative expressions contain a first-person singular subject, in some cases an object you, and a verb in the non-negative present tense which denotes a propositional attitude specifying the speaker’s view towards the following proposition. Examples: a) I promise that I will be there on time. b) I (hereby) apologize for running over your cat. c) I (hereby) request that you stay just a bit longer
  • 12. Pragmatic Idioms In addition to the standardized forms, there are pragmatic idioms, expressions for which there is no plausible inferential path leading from literal, direct meaning to the accepted basic pragmatic signal. There are two types of idioms: a) Force idioms, which signal the intended basic message force such as please (kindly) and perhaps (maybe):  Can you please help me? (Request)  Perhaps you should sit down and rest a bit. (suggestion)  How about going? (suggestion)  Long live the Queen. (wish)
  • 13. b) Message idioms, which signal the entire basic message.  Get a horse. [Directive to hurry up]  Where’s the fire. [Challenge for necessity of speed]  I smell a rat. [Claim that all is not well]
  • 14. C. Hybrid Basic Markers To this point, the basic pragmatic markers discussed have been either structural (e.g., the declarative structure) or lexical (e.g., performative expressions). There are, however, a number of markers which involve a specific structure in combination with certain lexical conditions, what I will call a “hybrid basic marker.” There are three general types: declarative-based, interrogative-based, and imperative-based. 1. Declarative-based Hybrids A declarative followed by a sentence-final interrogative tag.  John saw Mary, didn’t he?  John didn’t see Mary, did he?
  • 15. 2. Interrogative-based Hybrids a) Can (could/can’t/couldn’t) you do that? b) Will (would/won’t/wouldn’t) you do that? 3. Imperative-based Hybrids a) Talk, or I’ll shoot. (If you don’t talk, I’ll shoot.) b) Don’t smile, or I’ll clobber you. (If you smile, I’ll clobber you.)
  • 16.  Commentary Pragmatic Markers Commentary markers are lexical expressions, which have both a representational meaning specifying an entire message, and a procedural meaning signaling that this message is to function as a comment on some aspect of the basic message. They are of six types: 1. Assessment markers Assessment markers signal the speaker’s evaluation of the state of the world represented in the proposition. It delivers the basic message, and the comment. - Sadly, Mary arrived 5 minutes too late to meet the deadline. These assessment markers, primarily adverbs, may include: Amazingly, amusingly, annoyingly, appropriately, astonishingly, etc.
  • 17. 2. Manner-of-speaking markers Markers with which the speaker can signal a comment on the manner in which the basic message is being conveyed. - Bluntly, how are you going to get him off the hook? Adverbials falling into this group can include the following, Bluntly, candidly, confidentially, crudely, fairly, frankly, generally, etc
  • 18. 3. Evidential markers These markers signal the degree of confidence, positive or negative, weakly or strongly, held by the speaker about the truth of the basic message. - Indeed, I promise to be on time. Evidential markers can include the following: Assuredly, clearly, conceivably, decidedly, definitely, doubtless, etc.
  • 19. 4. Hearsay markers Hearsay markers are comments about the type of source of the speaker’s information. - It is claimed that Susan did not kill the two boys. The class includes: Allegedly, I have heard, it appears, it is reported, it is rumored, one hears, purportedly, reportedly, etc.
  • 20. 5. Mitigation markers This marker signals the speaker’s desire to reduce the face loss associated with the basic message. (Brown & Levinson, 1988; Fraser, 1991). There is a number of varieties listed under this type of markers, two are mentioned below: 1. The pseudo-conditionals: Despite their appearance, these are not conditional sentences. Rather, they constitute a basic message with a mitigating comment on it. - If it’s not too much trouble, could you help me? 2. Expressions ending with but: The basic message that follows these mitigation markers, is typically disadvantageous to the addressee and thus susceptible to mitigation. - You are, of course, entitled to your own opinion, but are you sure that’s a safe thing to do?
  • 21. 6. Emphasis markers These markers have the function of emphasizing the force of the basic message. - Mark my words: Sam will end up in jail. This group is illustrated by expressions such as, By no means, by no stretch of the imagination, definitely, DO VP, I cannot too often point out that, I emphasize (strongly) that, I insist that, etc.
  • 22. Parallel Pragmatic Markers The third type of pragmatic marker is the parallel marker, whose function is to signal an entire message in addition to the basic message. Four types can be viewed: A. Vocative markers By using one of these vocative forms, the speaker is explicitly sending the message that the addressee of this message is exactly whom was called. - Waiter, please bring me another fork. This group contains the vocatives, which include: Standard Titles: John, Mr. President, Colonel, Mom, Your Honor, Father Occupation Name: waiter, doctor, nurse, driver, judge General Nouns: brother, boys, guys, ladies and gentlemen, man, young lady Pronominal Forms: you, somebody, everyone, anyone.
  • 23. B) Speaker displeasure markers These markers signals the speaker’s displeasure. - Where in blue blazes is that young son of mine; it’s already 3 am. This group of markers includes Damn well, for the love of God, how many times have I told you, right now, the heck, etc.
  • 24. c. Solidarity markers These markers signals solidarity or lack thereof. - As one guy to another, we’re in deep trouble. - My friend, we simply have to get our act together and face this problem. - As your superior, I am authorized to tell you that you have been selected to go. - Look, birdbrain, this has been sitting in the “in box” for over a week. - What’s the story?
  • 25. Focusing markers These markers signals focusing or refocusing on the topic at hand. - He can’t go. Y’see, he isn’t feeling well. Included in this group are: Alright, here, listen, look (here), now, so, well, y’see