SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Grice’s theory of implicature
(types, properties and diagnostic tests)
Prepared by: Shahad Hadi M. Hussain
Types of Implicatures
Conversational Implicatures Conventional Implicatures
- They are not context-dependent or
pragmatically explainable
- They must be learned on a word-
by-word basis
Particularized conversational
implicatures
Generalized conversational
implicatures
- pragmatic context-depedent inference;
- and motivated by the conversational maxims
the intended inference
depends on particular
features of the specific
context of the utterance
is normally implied by any use of the
triggering expression in ordinary
contexts
they are both not “inevitable”
i.e., they are not logically necessary
Example (1) :
- She gave him the key and he opened the door.
Implicature: She gave him the key and then he opened the door.
- are motivated by the Grice’s maxims of conversation
- they typically do not involve a violation of the maxims.
- the implicature arises precisely because the hearer assumes that the
speaker is obeying the maxims; if the implicated meaning were not true,
then there would be a violation
Generalized conversational implicatures
- the semantic content of English and is simply logical, the implicated
sequential meaning (‘and then’) is motivated by the maxim of manner
(sub-maxim: Be orderly).
- If the actual order of events was not the one indicated by the
sequential order of the conjoined clauses, the speaker would have
violated this maxim; therefore, unless there is evidence to the contrary,
the hearer will assume that the sequential meaning is intended.
Example (2) :
- The water is warm.
Implicature: The water is not hot.
- The word warm belongs to a set of words which identify various points on a scale of temperature:
frigid, cold, cool, lukewarm, warm, hot, burning/sizzling/scalding, etc.
- The choice of the word warm implicates ‘not hot’ by the maxim of quantity.
- If the speaker knew that the water was hot but only said that it was warm, he would not have been as
informative as would be appropriate in most contexts.
- This inference does not depend on particular features of the context, but is normally triggered by any
use of the word warm unless something in the context prevents it from arising.
- Scalar implicatures : widely discussed type of generalized
conversational implicature involves non-maximal degree
modifiers, that is, words which refer to intermediate points on a
scale
- It can trigger generalized conversational implicatures concerning the
possessor of the indefinite noun phrase, with different implicatures
depending on whether the head noun is:
1- alienable as in:
- I walked into a house.
Implicature: The house was not my house.
2- inalienable as in:
- I broke a finger yesterday.
Implicature: The finger was my finger.
- But how to account for this difference is somewhat puzzling.
- The indefinite article
Conventional Implicatures
- They are part of the conventional meaning of a word or construction
- They are not context-dependent or pragmatically explainable
- They must be learned on a word-by-word basis.
- They do not contribute to the truth conditions of a sentence
- They have been sometimes regarded as involving pragmatic rather than
semantic content.
- It illustrated by using the conjunction therefore; as this word does not affect the
truth value of a sentence.
- I was in Paris last spring too
CI: some other specific/contextually salient person was in Paris last spring.
- Even Bart passed the test
CI: Bart was among the least likely to pass the test.
- Conventional implicatures turn out to have very similar properties to certain kinds of
presuppositions, and there has been extensive debate over the question of whether it is
possible or desirable to distinguish conventional implicatures from presuppositions.
Examples of conventional implicatures (CI)
Distinguishing features of conversational implicatures
1- Defeasible
2- Suspendable
3- Calculable
4- Indeterminate
5- Nondetachable
6- Reinforceable
Grice’s analysis of conversational implicatures (both particularized and generalized) implies that they will
have certain properties which allow us to distinguish them from other kinds of inference:
1- Defeasible:
- It means that the inference can be cancelled by adding an additional premise.
Conversational implicatures can be explicitly negated or denied without giving
rise to anomaly or contradiction
For Examples:
- He has been paying a lot of visits to New York lately, but I don’t think he
has a girlfriend there, either.
- John has most of the documents; in fact, he has all of them.
2- Suspendable:
- the speaker may explicitly choose not to commit to the truth or falsehood of the
inference, without giving rise to anomaly or contradiction.
For Examples:
- The water must be warm by now, if not boiling.
- The water must be warm by now, if not cold.
3- Calculable, that is, capable of being worked out on the basis of :
(i) The literal meaning of the utterance,
(ii) The Cooperative Principle and its maxims,
(iii) The context of the utterance,
(iv) Background knowledge,
(v) the assumption that (i)–(iv) are available to both participants of the
exchange and that they are both aware of this.
4- Indeterminate: sometimes multiple interpretations are possible for a given
utterance in a particular context.
5- Nondetachable: it refers to that:
- Conversational implicatures are not part of the conventional meaning of the
linguistic expression, and;
- They are triggered by the semantic content of what is said rather than its
linguistic form, replacing words with synonyms, or a sentence with its
paraphrase, will generally not change the conversational implicatures that are
generated, assuming the context is identical.
A: Smith doesn’t seem to have a girlfriend these days.
B1: He has been paying a lot of visits to New York lately.
B2: He travels to New York quite frequently, I have noticed.
.
6- Reinforceable: it mean that the implicature can be overtly stated without
creating a sense of anomalous redundancy.
- John is a capable fellow, but I wouldn’t call him a genius.
- Some of the boys went to the soccer match, but not all.
- Some of the boys went to the soccer match, but not none.
How to distinguish between inferences
(Diagnostic Tests)
Two general comments need to be kept in mind:
First: ask whether there is in fact a linguistic inference to be tested.
The question : if a speaker whom we believe to be truthful and well-informed says p,
would this utterance in and of itself give us reason to believe q? )
- If yes: we can apply the tests to determine the nature of the inference from p to q.
- If not: applying the tests will only cause confusion.
Second: it is important to use several tests whenever possible,
and choose the analysis that best explains the full range of
available data.
Because any one test may give unreliable results in a particular
example, because so many complex factors contribute to the
meaning of an utterance.
For example:
My bank manager has just been murdered
(it seems reasonable to assume that the bank will soon be hiring a
new manager. this expectation is based on our knowledge of how
the world works, and not the meaning of the sentence itself; there
is no linguistic inference involved. If the bank owners decided to
leave the position unfilled, it would not render the speaker’s
statement false or misleading)
Stated: John killed the wasp.
Inferred: The wasp died.
a. # John killed the wasp, but the wasp did not die.
b. # John killed the wasp, but I’m not sure
whether the wasp died.
c. ?# John killed the wasp, and the wasp died.
d. Did John kill the wasp?
e. John did not kill the wasp (and the wasp did not die).
Cancellable/
Defeasible
The result is a contradiction.
Suspended The result is quite unnatural
Reinforceable The result is unnaturally redundant
Negation
Questioning
We can demonstrate this by
showing that it would not be a
contradiction to assert, in the same
sentence, that the wasp did not die
All four tests in this example produce negative results. This pattern matches the
profile of entailment; so we conclude that
John killed the wasp entails The wasp died.
A: I am out of petrol.
B: There is a garage around the corner.
Inferred: You can buy petrol there.
a. There is a garage around the corner, but they
aren’t selling petrol today.
b. There is a garage around the corner, but I’m not
sure whether they sell petrol.
c. There is a garage around the corner, and you can
buy petrol there.
d. Is there a garage around the corner?
e. There is no garage around the corner (any more).
The first three tests produce positive results, while the last
one is negative. This pattern matches the profile of conversational implicature;
so we conclude that: There is a garage around the corner
Defeasible
Negation
Questioning
Suspendable
Reinforceable
These would not give
any reason to believe
that he could buy petrol
around the corner.
Implicature
Implicature

More Related Content

What's hot

Conversational Implicature ,coperative principles , conventional implicature
Conversational Implicature ,coperative principles , conventional implicatureConversational Implicature ,coperative principles , conventional implicature
Conversational Implicature ,coperative principles , conventional implicature
Naqvisailya
 
Rzeszov ling pragmatics
Rzeszov ling pragmatics Rzeszov ling pragmatics
Rzeszov ling pragmatics
云珍 邓
 
Implicature
ImplicatureImplicature
Implicature
emanomari
 
Implicature
ImplicatureImplicature
Implicature
Mariam Bedraoui
 
Conversational implicature
Conversational implicatureConversational implicature
Conversational implicature
Fabian Rod
 
The structure of arguments
The structure of argumentsThe structure of arguments
The structure of arguments
Dr. Mohsin Khan
 
the relevance theory- pragmatics
the relevance theory- pragmaticsthe relevance theory- pragmatics
the relevance theory- pragmatics
kiran nazir
 
The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)
The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)
The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)
Faiza Sandhu
 
05 cooperation and implicature for students
05 cooperation and implicature for students05 cooperation and implicature for students
05 cooperation and implicature for students
gadis pratiwi
 
Componential Analysis of Meaning.pptx
Componential Analysis of Meaning.pptxComponential Analysis of Meaning.pptx
Componential Analysis of Meaning.pptx
Rasha sakr
 
The role of context in interpretation chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbal
The role of context in interpretation    chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbalThe role of context in interpretation    chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbal
The role of context in interpretation chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbal
Fayez Habbal
 
Cooperative principle
Cooperative principleCooperative principle
Cooperative principle
Saima Gul
 
Cooperative principle
Cooperative principleCooperative principle
Cooperative principle
Diyar Mustafa
 
PRAGMATICS: MAXIM FLOUTING
PRAGMATICS: MAXIM FLOUTINGPRAGMATICS: MAXIM FLOUTING
PRAGMATICS: MAXIM FLOUTING
A. Tenry Lawangen Aspat Colle
 
Relevance theory part 1
Relevance theory part 1Relevance theory part 1
Relevance theory part 1
Sara Nasrollahi
 
07 politeness and interaction for students
07 politeness and interaction for students07 politeness and interaction for students
07 politeness and interaction for students
gadis pratiwi
 
Speech Acts - pragmatics
Speech Acts - pragmaticsSpeech Acts - pragmatics
Speech Acts - pragmatics
SherlyArwinda1
 
Componential analysis ppt
Componential analysis pptComponential analysis ppt
Componential analysis ppt
AlveenaNazir
 
PRAGMATICS: CONCEPT OF IMPLICATURE
PRAGMATICS: CONCEPT OF IMPLICATUREPRAGMATICS: CONCEPT OF IMPLICATURE
PRAGMATICS: CONCEPT OF IMPLICATURE
A. Tenry Lawangen Aspat Colle
 
Pragmatics
PragmaticsPragmatics
Pragmatics
Asif Usman
 

What's hot (20)

Conversational Implicature ,coperative principles , conventional implicature
Conversational Implicature ,coperative principles , conventional implicatureConversational Implicature ,coperative principles , conventional implicature
Conversational Implicature ,coperative principles , conventional implicature
 
Rzeszov ling pragmatics
Rzeszov ling pragmatics Rzeszov ling pragmatics
Rzeszov ling pragmatics
 
Implicature
ImplicatureImplicature
Implicature
 
Implicature
ImplicatureImplicature
Implicature
 
Conversational implicature
Conversational implicatureConversational implicature
Conversational implicature
 
The structure of arguments
The structure of argumentsThe structure of arguments
The structure of arguments
 
the relevance theory- pragmatics
the relevance theory- pragmaticsthe relevance theory- pragmatics
the relevance theory- pragmatics
 
The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)
The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)
The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)
 
05 cooperation and implicature for students
05 cooperation and implicature for students05 cooperation and implicature for students
05 cooperation and implicature for students
 
Componential Analysis of Meaning.pptx
Componential Analysis of Meaning.pptxComponential Analysis of Meaning.pptx
Componential Analysis of Meaning.pptx
 
The role of context in interpretation chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbal
The role of context in interpretation    chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbalThe role of context in interpretation    chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbal
The role of context in interpretation chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbal
 
Cooperative principle
Cooperative principleCooperative principle
Cooperative principle
 
Cooperative principle
Cooperative principleCooperative principle
Cooperative principle
 
PRAGMATICS: MAXIM FLOUTING
PRAGMATICS: MAXIM FLOUTINGPRAGMATICS: MAXIM FLOUTING
PRAGMATICS: MAXIM FLOUTING
 
Relevance theory part 1
Relevance theory part 1Relevance theory part 1
Relevance theory part 1
 
07 politeness and interaction for students
07 politeness and interaction for students07 politeness and interaction for students
07 politeness and interaction for students
 
Speech Acts - pragmatics
Speech Acts - pragmaticsSpeech Acts - pragmatics
Speech Acts - pragmatics
 
Componential analysis ppt
Componential analysis pptComponential analysis ppt
Componential analysis ppt
 
PRAGMATICS: CONCEPT OF IMPLICATURE
PRAGMATICS: CONCEPT OF IMPLICATUREPRAGMATICS: CONCEPT OF IMPLICATURE
PRAGMATICS: CONCEPT OF IMPLICATURE
 
Pragmatics
PragmaticsPragmatics
Pragmatics
 

Similar to Implicature

share 110.pptx
share 110.pptxshare 110.pptx
share 110.pptx
MSFATINQAISARAROZAIM
 
Notes for logic
Notes for logicNotes for logic
Notes for logic
Amit Chaudhary
 
Kelompok 6 semprag (cooperation and implicature)
Kelompok 6 semprag (cooperation and implicature)Kelompok 6 semprag (cooperation and implicature)
Kelompok 6 semprag (cooperation and implicature)
donawidiya
 
Obstacle to Clear Thinking PPT for Speech with Argumentation and Debate.pptx
Obstacle to Clear Thinking PPT for Speech with Argumentation and Debate.pptxObstacle to Clear Thinking PPT for Speech with Argumentation and Debate.pptx
Obstacle to Clear Thinking PPT for Speech with Argumentation and Debate.pptx
ChelleyBatallerOfald
 
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in InterpretationDISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
Siti Purwaningsih
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
Gibreel Sadeq Alaghbary
 
Semactics : Utterance Meaning
Semactics : Utterance MeaningSemactics : Utterance Meaning
Semactics : Utterance Meaning
Phi Pham
 
Fallacies of vagueness
Fallacies of vaguenessFallacies of vagueness
Fallacies of vagueness
NikhatAnsari5
 
Let-English-Major-PART-II (1).pptx LET reviewer
Let-English-Major-PART-II (1).pptx LET reviewerLet-English-Major-PART-II (1).pptx LET reviewer
Let-English-Major-PART-II (1).pptx LET reviewer
ElysaMicu
 
Grice maxims
Grice maximsGrice maxims
Grice maxims
Stella Karamadouki
 
Fallacies
FallaciesFallacies
Fallacies
Shane Guillergan
 
Relevance Theory
Relevance TheoryRelevance Theory
Relevance Theory
alexgbarros1138
 
Introduction to pragmatics.pptx
Introduction to pragmatics.pptxIntroduction to pragmatics.pptx
Introduction to pragmatics.pptx
ImaneBrigui
 
Introduction_to_pragmatics17[1].pptx
Introduction_to_pragmatics17[1].pptxIntroduction_to_pragmatics17[1].pptx
Introduction_to_pragmatics17[1].pptx
MariaLizaCamo1
 
Discourse_Analysis.pptx
Discourse_Analysis.pptxDiscourse_Analysis.pptx
Discourse_Analysis.pptx
EzekielAnselm
 
158822678712 (fallacy and types).docx
158822678712 (fallacy and types).docx158822678712 (fallacy and types).docx
158822678712 (fallacy and types).docx
Santosh Kaur
 
Chap 4 1
Chap 4  1Chap 4  1
Chap 4 1
Ijaz Ahmed
 
Fallacy of ambiguity, kinds of ambiguity , emotively neutral language, kinds ...
Fallacy of ambiguity, kinds of ambiguity , emotively neutral language, kinds ...Fallacy of ambiguity, kinds of ambiguity , emotively neutral language, kinds ...
Fallacy of ambiguity, kinds of ambiguity , emotively neutral language, kinds ...
AMIR HASSAN
 
Discourse analysis by naveed ali
Discourse analysis by naveed aliDiscourse analysis by naveed ali
Discourse analysis by naveed ali
Naveed Ali
 
Aspects of Sentential Meaning.pptx
Aspects of Sentential Meaning.pptxAspects of Sentential Meaning.pptx
Aspects of Sentential Meaning.pptx
karlwinn1
 

Similar to Implicature (20)

share 110.pptx
share 110.pptxshare 110.pptx
share 110.pptx
 
Notes for logic
Notes for logicNotes for logic
Notes for logic
 
Kelompok 6 semprag (cooperation and implicature)
Kelompok 6 semprag (cooperation and implicature)Kelompok 6 semprag (cooperation and implicature)
Kelompok 6 semprag (cooperation and implicature)
 
Obstacle to Clear Thinking PPT for Speech with Argumentation and Debate.pptx
Obstacle to Clear Thinking PPT for Speech with Argumentation and Debate.pptxObstacle to Clear Thinking PPT for Speech with Argumentation and Debate.pptx
Obstacle to Clear Thinking PPT for Speech with Argumentation and Debate.pptx
 
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in InterpretationDISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
 
Semactics : Utterance Meaning
Semactics : Utterance MeaningSemactics : Utterance Meaning
Semactics : Utterance Meaning
 
Fallacies of vagueness
Fallacies of vaguenessFallacies of vagueness
Fallacies of vagueness
 
Let-English-Major-PART-II (1).pptx LET reviewer
Let-English-Major-PART-II (1).pptx LET reviewerLet-English-Major-PART-II (1).pptx LET reviewer
Let-English-Major-PART-II (1).pptx LET reviewer
 
Grice maxims
Grice maximsGrice maxims
Grice maxims
 
Fallacies
FallaciesFallacies
Fallacies
 
Relevance Theory
Relevance TheoryRelevance Theory
Relevance Theory
 
Introduction to pragmatics.pptx
Introduction to pragmatics.pptxIntroduction to pragmatics.pptx
Introduction to pragmatics.pptx
 
Introduction_to_pragmatics17[1].pptx
Introduction_to_pragmatics17[1].pptxIntroduction_to_pragmatics17[1].pptx
Introduction_to_pragmatics17[1].pptx
 
Discourse_Analysis.pptx
Discourse_Analysis.pptxDiscourse_Analysis.pptx
Discourse_Analysis.pptx
 
158822678712 (fallacy and types).docx
158822678712 (fallacy and types).docx158822678712 (fallacy and types).docx
158822678712 (fallacy and types).docx
 
Chap 4 1
Chap 4  1Chap 4  1
Chap 4 1
 
Fallacy of ambiguity, kinds of ambiguity , emotively neutral language, kinds ...
Fallacy of ambiguity, kinds of ambiguity , emotively neutral language, kinds ...Fallacy of ambiguity, kinds of ambiguity , emotively neutral language, kinds ...
Fallacy of ambiguity, kinds of ambiguity , emotively neutral language, kinds ...
 
Discourse analysis by naveed ali
Discourse analysis by naveed aliDiscourse analysis by naveed ali
Discourse analysis by naveed ali
 
Aspects of Sentential Meaning.pptx
Aspects of Sentential Meaning.pptxAspects of Sentential Meaning.pptx
Aspects of Sentential Meaning.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

Introduction to Banking System in India.ppt
Introduction to Banking System in India.pptIntroduction to Banking System in India.ppt
Introduction to Banking System in India.ppt
Dr. S. Bulomine Regi
 
Open Source and AI - ByWater Closing Keynote Presentation.pdf
Open Source and AI - ByWater Closing Keynote Presentation.pdfOpen Source and AI - ByWater Closing Keynote Presentation.pdf
Open Source and AI - ByWater Closing Keynote Presentation.pdf
Jessica Zairo
 
Codeavour 5.0 International Impact Report - The Biggest International AI, Cod...
Codeavour 5.0 International Impact Report - The Biggest International AI, Cod...Codeavour 5.0 International Impact Report - The Biggest International AI, Cod...
Codeavour 5.0 International Impact Report - The Biggest International AI, Cod...
Codeavour International
 
11EHS Term 3 Week 1 Unit 1 Review: Feedback and improvementpptx
11EHS Term 3 Week 1 Unit 1 Review: Feedback and improvementpptx11EHS Term 3 Week 1 Unit 1 Review: Feedback and improvementpptx
11EHS Term 3 Week 1 Unit 1 Review: Feedback and improvementpptx
mansk2
 
DepEd School Calendar 2024-2025 DO_s2024_008
DepEd School Calendar 2024-2025 DO_s2024_008DepEd School Calendar 2024-2025 DO_s2024_008
DepEd School Calendar 2024-2025 DO_s2024_008
Glenn Rivera
 
How To Update One2many Field From OnChange of Field in Odoo 17
How To Update One2many Field From OnChange of Field in Odoo 17How To Update One2many Field From OnChange of Field in Odoo 17
How To Update One2many Field From OnChange of Field in Odoo 17
Celine George
 
How to Manage Access Rights & User Types in Odoo 17
How to Manage Access Rights & User Types in Odoo 17How to Manage Access Rights & User Types in Odoo 17
How to Manage Access Rights & User Types in Odoo 17
Celine George
 
RDBMS Lecture Notes Unit4 chapter12 VIEW
RDBMS Lecture Notes Unit4 chapter12 VIEWRDBMS Lecture Notes Unit4 chapter12 VIEW
RDBMS Lecture Notes Unit4 chapter12 VIEW
Murugan Solaiyappan
 
How to Add a Filter in the Odoo 17 - Odoo 17 Slides
How to Add a Filter in the Odoo 17 - Odoo 17 SlidesHow to Add a Filter in the Odoo 17 - Odoo 17 Slides
How to Add a Filter in the Odoo 17 - Odoo 17 Slides
Celine George
 
Allopathic M1 Srudent Orientation Powerpoint
Allopathic M1 Srudent Orientation PowerpointAllopathic M1 Srudent Orientation Powerpoint
Allopathic M1 Srudent Orientation Powerpoint
Julie Sarpy
 
How to Empty a One2Many Field in Odoo 17
How to Empty a One2Many Field in Odoo 17How to Empty a One2Many Field in Odoo 17
How to Empty a One2Many Field in Odoo 17
Celine George
 
SEQUNCES Lecture_Notes_Unit4_chapter11_sequence
SEQUNCES  Lecture_Notes_Unit4_chapter11_sequenceSEQUNCES  Lecture_Notes_Unit4_chapter11_sequence
SEQUNCES Lecture_Notes_Unit4_chapter11_sequence
Murugan Solaiyappan
 
E-learning Odoo 17 New features - Odoo 17 Slides
E-learning Odoo 17  New features - Odoo 17 SlidesE-learning Odoo 17  New features - Odoo 17 Slides
E-learning Odoo 17 New features - Odoo 17 Slides
Celine George
 
View Inheritance in Odoo 17 - Odoo 17 Slides
View Inheritance in Odoo 17 - Odoo 17  SlidesView Inheritance in Odoo 17 - Odoo 17  Slides
View Inheritance in Odoo 17 - Odoo 17 Slides
Celine George
 
Odoo 17 Events - Attendees List Scanning
Odoo 17 Events - Attendees List ScanningOdoo 17 Events - Attendees List Scanning
Odoo 17 Events - Attendees List Scanning
Celine George
 
Parent PD Design for Professional Development .docx
Parent PD Design for Professional Development .docxParent PD Design for Professional Development .docx
Parent PD Design for Professional Development .docx
AntonioJarligoCompra
 
How to Create & Publish a Blog in Odoo 17 Website
How to Create & Publish a Blog in Odoo 17 WebsiteHow to Create & Publish a Blog in Odoo 17 Website
How to Create & Publish a Blog in Odoo 17 Website
Celine George
 
"DANH SÁCH THÍ SINH XÉT TUYỂN SỚM ĐỦ ĐIỀU KIỆN TRÚNG TUYỂN ĐẠI HỌC CHÍNH QUY ...
"DANH SÁCH THÍ SINH XÉT TUYỂN SỚM ĐỦ ĐIỀU KIỆN TRÚNG TUYỂN ĐẠI HỌC CHÍNH QUY ..."DANH SÁCH THÍ SINH XÉT TUYỂN SỚM ĐỦ ĐIỀU KIỆN TRÚNG TUYỂN ĐẠI HỌC CHÍNH QUY ...
"DANH SÁCH THÍ SINH XÉT TUYỂN SỚM ĐỦ ĐIỀU KIỆN TRÚNG TUYỂN ĐẠI HỌC CHÍNH QUY ...
thanhluan21
 
SD_Integrating 21st Century Skills in Classroom-based Assessment.pptx
SD_Integrating 21st Century Skills in Classroom-based Assessment.pptxSD_Integrating 21st Century Skills in Classroom-based Assessment.pptx
SD_Integrating 21st Century Skills in Classroom-based Assessment.pptx
elwoodprias1
 
NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct Resource Book
NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct Resource BookNAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct Resource Book
NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct Resource Book
lakitawilson
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Introduction to Banking System in India.ppt
Introduction to Banking System in India.pptIntroduction to Banking System in India.ppt
Introduction to Banking System in India.ppt
 
Open Source and AI - ByWater Closing Keynote Presentation.pdf
Open Source and AI - ByWater Closing Keynote Presentation.pdfOpen Source and AI - ByWater Closing Keynote Presentation.pdf
Open Source and AI - ByWater Closing Keynote Presentation.pdf
 
Codeavour 5.0 International Impact Report - The Biggest International AI, Cod...
Codeavour 5.0 International Impact Report - The Biggest International AI, Cod...Codeavour 5.0 International Impact Report - The Biggest International AI, Cod...
Codeavour 5.0 International Impact Report - The Biggest International AI, Cod...
 
11EHS Term 3 Week 1 Unit 1 Review: Feedback and improvementpptx
11EHS Term 3 Week 1 Unit 1 Review: Feedback and improvementpptx11EHS Term 3 Week 1 Unit 1 Review: Feedback and improvementpptx
11EHS Term 3 Week 1 Unit 1 Review: Feedback and improvementpptx
 
DepEd School Calendar 2024-2025 DO_s2024_008
DepEd School Calendar 2024-2025 DO_s2024_008DepEd School Calendar 2024-2025 DO_s2024_008
DepEd School Calendar 2024-2025 DO_s2024_008
 
How To Update One2many Field From OnChange of Field in Odoo 17
How To Update One2many Field From OnChange of Field in Odoo 17How To Update One2many Field From OnChange of Field in Odoo 17
How To Update One2many Field From OnChange of Field in Odoo 17
 
How to Manage Access Rights & User Types in Odoo 17
How to Manage Access Rights & User Types in Odoo 17How to Manage Access Rights & User Types in Odoo 17
How to Manage Access Rights & User Types in Odoo 17
 
RDBMS Lecture Notes Unit4 chapter12 VIEW
RDBMS Lecture Notes Unit4 chapter12 VIEWRDBMS Lecture Notes Unit4 chapter12 VIEW
RDBMS Lecture Notes Unit4 chapter12 VIEW
 
How to Add a Filter in the Odoo 17 - Odoo 17 Slides
How to Add a Filter in the Odoo 17 - Odoo 17 SlidesHow to Add a Filter in the Odoo 17 - Odoo 17 Slides
How to Add a Filter in the Odoo 17 - Odoo 17 Slides
 
Allopathic M1 Srudent Orientation Powerpoint
Allopathic M1 Srudent Orientation PowerpointAllopathic M1 Srudent Orientation Powerpoint
Allopathic M1 Srudent Orientation Powerpoint
 
How to Empty a One2Many Field in Odoo 17
How to Empty a One2Many Field in Odoo 17How to Empty a One2Many Field in Odoo 17
How to Empty a One2Many Field in Odoo 17
 
SEQUNCES Lecture_Notes_Unit4_chapter11_sequence
SEQUNCES  Lecture_Notes_Unit4_chapter11_sequenceSEQUNCES  Lecture_Notes_Unit4_chapter11_sequence
SEQUNCES Lecture_Notes_Unit4_chapter11_sequence
 
E-learning Odoo 17 New features - Odoo 17 Slides
E-learning Odoo 17  New features - Odoo 17 SlidesE-learning Odoo 17  New features - Odoo 17 Slides
E-learning Odoo 17 New features - Odoo 17 Slides
 
View Inheritance in Odoo 17 - Odoo 17 Slides
View Inheritance in Odoo 17 - Odoo 17  SlidesView Inheritance in Odoo 17 - Odoo 17  Slides
View Inheritance in Odoo 17 - Odoo 17 Slides
 
Odoo 17 Events - Attendees List Scanning
Odoo 17 Events - Attendees List ScanningOdoo 17 Events - Attendees List Scanning
Odoo 17 Events - Attendees List Scanning
 
Parent PD Design for Professional Development .docx
Parent PD Design for Professional Development .docxParent PD Design for Professional Development .docx
Parent PD Design for Professional Development .docx
 
How to Create & Publish a Blog in Odoo 17 Website
How to Create & Publish a Blog in Odoo 17 WebsiteHow to Create & Publish a Blog in Odoo 17 Website
How to Create & Publish a Blog in Odoo 17 Website
 
"DANH SÁCH THÍ SINH XÉT TUYỂN SỚM ĐỦ ĐIỀU KIỆN TRÚNG TUYỂN ĐẠI HỌC CHÍNH QUY ...
"DANH SÁCH THÍ SINH XÉT TUYỂN SỚM ĐỦ ĐIỀU KIỆN TRÚNG TUYỂN ĐẠI HỌC CHÍNH QUY ..."DANH SÁCH THÍ SINH XÉT TUYỂN SỚM ĐỦ ĐIỀU KIỆN TRÚNG TUYỂN ĐẠI HỌC CHÍNH QUY ...
"DANH SÁCH THÍ SINH XÉT TUYỂN SỚM ĐỦ ĐIỀU KIỆN TRÚNG TUYỂN ĐẠI HỌC CHÍNH QUY ...
 
SD_Integrating 21st Century Skills in Classroom-based Assessment.pptx
SD_Integrating 21st Century Skills in Classroom-based Assessment.pptxSD_Integrating 21st Century Skills in Classroom-based Assessment.pptx
SD_Integrating 21st Century Skills in Classroom-based Assessment.pptx
 
NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct Resource Book
NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct Resource BookNAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct Resource Book
NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct Resource Book
 

Implicature

  • 1. Grice’s theory of implicature (types, properties and diagnostic tests) Prepared by: Shahad Hadi M. Hussain
  • 2. Types of Implicatures Conversational Implicatures Conventional Implicatures - They are not context-dependent or pragmatically explainable - They must be learned on a word- by-word basis Particularized conversational implicatures Generalized conversational implicatures - pragmatic context-depedent inference; - and motivated by the conversational maxims the intended inference depends on particular features of the specific context of the utterance is normally implied by any use of the triggering expression in ordinary contexts they are both not “inevitable” i.e., they are not logically necessary
  • 3. Example (1) : - She gave him the key and he opened the door. Implicature: She gave him the key and then he opened the door. - are motivated by the Grice’s maxims of conversation - they typically do not involve a violation of the maxims. - the implicature arises precisely because the hearer assumes that the speaker is obeying the maxims; if the implicated meaning were not true, then there would be a violation Generalized conversational implicatures - the semantic content of English and is simply logical, the implicated sequential meaning (‘and then’) is motivated by the maxim of manner (sub-maxim: Be orderly). - If the actual order of events was not the one indicated by the sequential order of the conjoined clauses, the speaker would have violated this maxim; therefore, unless there is evidence to the contrary, the hearer will assume that the sequential meaning is intended.
  • 4. Example (2) : - The water is warm. Implicature: The water is not hot. - The word warm belongs to a set of words which identify various points on a scale of temperature: frigid, cold, cool, lukewarm, warm, hot, burning/sizzling/scalding, etc. - The choice of the word warm implicates ‘not hot’ by the maxim of quantity. - If the speaker knew that the water was hot but only said that it was warm, he would not have been as informative as would be appropriate in most contexts. - This inference does not depend on particular features of the context, but is normally triggered by any use of the word warm unless something in the context prevents it from arising. - Scalar implicatures : widely discussed type of generalized conversational implicature involves non-maximal degree modifiers, that is, words which refer to intermediate points on a scale
  • 5. - It can trigger generalized conversational implicatures concerning the possessor of the indefinite noun phrase, with different implicatures depending on whether the head noun is: 1- alienable as in: - I walked into a house. Implicature: The house was not my house. 2- inalienable as in: - I broke a finger yesterday. Implicature: The finger was my finger. - But how to account for this difference is somewhat puzzling. - The indefinite article
  • 6. Conventional Implicatures - They are part of the conventional meaning of a word or construction - They are not context-dependent or pragmatically explainable - They must be learned on a word-by-word basis. - They do not contribute to the truth conditions of a sentence - They have been sometimes regarded as involving pragmatic rather than semantic content. - It illustrated by using the conjunction therefore; as this word does not affect the truth value of a sentence.
  • 7. - I was in Paris last spring too CI: some other specific/contextually salient person was in Paris last spring. - Even Bart passed the test CI: Bart was among the least likely to pass the test. - Conventional implicatures turn out to have very similar properties to certain kinds of presuppositions, and there has been extensive debate over the question of whether it is possible or desirable to distinguish conventional implicatures from presuppositions. Examples of conventional implicatures (CI)
  • 8. Distinguishing features of conversational implicatures 1- Defeasible 2- Suspendable 3- Calculable 4- Indeterminate 5- Nondetachable 6- Reinforceable Grice’s analysis of conversational implicatures (both particularized and generalized) implies that they will have certain properties which allow us to distinguish them from other kinds of inference:
  • 9. 1- Defeasible: - It means that the inference can be cancelled by adding an additional premise. Conversational implicatures can be explicitly negated or denied without giving rise to anomaly or contradiction For Examples: - He has been paying a lot of visits to New York lately, but I don’t think he has a girlfriend there, either. - John has most of the documents; in fact, he has all of them.
  • 10. 2- Suspendable: - the speaker may explicitly choose not to commit to the truth or falsehood of the inference, without giving rise to anomaly or contradiction. For Examples: - The water must be warm by now, if not boiling. - The water must be warm by now, if not cold.
  • 11. 3- Calculable, that is, capable of being worked out on the basis of : (i) The literal meaning of the utterance, (ii) The Cooperative Principle and its maxims, (iii) The context of the utterance, (iv) Background knowledge, (v) the assumption that (i)–(iv) are available to both participants of the exchange and that they are both aware of this. 4- Indeterminate: sometimes multiple interpretations are possible for a given utterance in a particular context.
  • 12. 5- Nondetachable: it refers to that: - Conversational implicatures are not part of the conventional meaning of the linguistic expression, and; - They are triggered by the semantic content of what is said rather than its linguistic form, replacing words with synonyms, or a sentence with its paraphrase, will generally not change the conversational implicatures that are generated, assuming the context is identical. A: Smith doesn’t seem to have a girlfriend these days. B1: He has been paying a lot of visits to New York lately. B2: He travels to New York quite frequently, I have noticed. .
  • 13. 6- Reinforceable: it mean that the implicature can be overtly stated without creating a sense of anomalous redundancy. - John is a capable fellow, but I wouldn’t call him a genius. - Some of the boys went to the soccer match, but not all. - Some of the boys went to the soccer match, but not none.
  • 14. How to distinguish between inferences (Diagnostic Tests) Two general comments need to be kept in mind: First: ask whether there is in fact a linguistic inference to be tested. The question : if a speaker whom we believe to be truthful and well-informed says p, would this utterance in and of itself give us reason to believe q? ) - If yes: we can apply the tests to determine the nature of the inference from p to q. - If not: applying the tests will only cause confusion. Second: it is important to use several tests whenever possible, and choose the analysis that best explains the full range of available data. Because any one test may give unreliable results in a particular example, because so many complex factors contribute to the meaning of an utterance. For example: My bank manager has just been murdered (it seems reasonable to assume that the bank will soon be hiring a new manager. this expectation is based on our knowledge of how the world works, and not the meaning of the sentence itself; there is no linguistic inference involved. If the bank owners decided to leave the position unfilled, it would not render the speaker’s statement false or misleading)
  • 15. Stated: John killed the wasp. Inferred: The wasp died. a. # John killed the wasp, but the wasp did not die. b. # John killed the wasp, but I’m not sure whether the wasp died. c. ?# John killed the wasp, and the wasp died. d. Did John kill the wasp? e. John did not kill the wasp (and the wasp did not die). Cancellable/ Defeasible The result is a contradiction. Suspended The result is quite unnatural Reinforceable The result is unnaturally redundant Negation Questioning We can demonstrate this by showing that it would not be a contradiction to assert, in the same sentence, that the wasp did not die All four tests in this example produce negative results. This pattern matches the profile of entailment; so we conclude that John killed the wasp entails The wasp died.
  • 16. A: I am out of petrol. B: There is a garage around the corner. Inferred: You can buy petrol there. a. There is a garage around the corner, but they aren’t selling petrol today. b. There is a garage around the corner, but I’m not sure whether they sell petrol. c. There is a garage around the corner, and you can buy petrol there. d. Is there a garage around the corner? e. There is no garage around the corner (any more). The first three tests produce positive results, while the last one is negative. This pattern matches the profile of conversational implicature; so we conclude that: There is a garage around the corner Defeasible Negation Questioning Suspendable Reinforceable These would not give any reason to believe that he could buy petrol around the corner.