More Related Content
Similar to POWER FOR FRAC SAND MINES DURING CONSTRUCTION & EARLY PRODUCTION
Similar to POWER FOR FRAC SAND MINES DURING CONSTRUCTION & EARLY PRODUCTION (20)
More from iQHub
More from iQHub (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
POWER FOR FRAC SAND MINES DURING CONSTRUCTION & EARLY PRODUCTION
- 1. Powering Frac Sand Mine Operations with Modular Natural Gas Power Solutions
- 2. WHAT ARE WE HERE TO TALK ABOUT? Ways Contractors and Frac Sand Mine Operators can utilize new approaches, coupled with the experience and lessons learned over the last 30 years, to ensure success for their projects. • Who is Aggreko? • Case Study • Engineering the Solution • Safety • Magnitude of Team • Value of Redundancy • Q&A This is achieved by taking a more sophisticated approach to integrating temporary utilities into your mine in a way that goes far beyond traditional equipment rentals.
- 3. Local presence. Global footprint 10 GW Power in our fleet $2 billion 2020 revenue 7,000+ employees Permanent Over 100 countries Where we operate 208+ locations Worldwide
- 6. A shift in the industry ▪ In-basin sand now accounts for majority of the market ▪ Sand supplies are dissipating as demand increases ▪ Price increase and operational focus on cost savings ▪ Can prices stay where they are if oil continues to drop?
- 7. Case study ▪ Land, permits, design, money, equipment ordered ▪ Remote site locations - no infrastructure ▪ Existing utilities can’t handle the needs ▪ Scalable temporary power system installed ▪ Power size changes with production volume
- 8. Field/Flare Gas Pipeline Gas Mobile CNG LNG Propane Fueling flexibility
- 9. Challenges to and advantages of natural gas as a fuel source Securing natural gas supply and ROW’s Installation of flow line (can be miles) Installation of hot tap – getting a firm date Scalability… don’t pay for what you don’t need Lean Burn vs. Rich Burn engines Low carbon footprint
- 11. ENGINEERING: LAYOUT, SCOPE, DRAWINGS, COST REDUCTION
- 12. EQUIPMENT LOCATION PLANS, ONE LINE DIAGRAMS AND GROUNDING PLANS
- 13. EQUIPMENT LOCATION PLANS, ONE LINE DIAGRAMS AND GROUNDING PLANS • Layout drawings allow for precise placement of the equipment, • Saving time and confusion at a critical point during the installation
- 16. CREATIVE WAYS TO TIE INTO CUSTOMER’S SYSTEMS Engineered Solutions to “Project Critical” situations Identification of all circuits Plant Substation
- 18. SAFETY
- 19. • Industrial Safety and Hygiene News reports that: • 30,000 ARC flash incidents occur annually, • Resulting in 7,000 burn injuries, • Requiring 2,000 hospitalizations, and • Resulting in 400 fatalities ARC FLASH AND ARC BLAST NFPA 70E, IEEE 1584 • An ARC flash happens when electric current flows through an air gap between two phase conductors or phase conductor and ground
- 20. Engineering – ground resistance test methods ▪ Simplified Fall of Potential – the most popular method ▪ Slope Method – for large ground grids ▪ Other acceptable methods exist for large ground systems but… ▪ For high resistivity soils this is especially important, such as dry sand ▪ Personnel and equipment at risk
- 21. Engineering – certification Ground Resistance Test Report (certificate)
- 23. Magnitude: who is involved ▪ Project installation & Commissioning team ▪ Operational support ▪ Contractors & Subcontractors Account Manager Electrical Engineer CAD Draftsman Lead Technician Commissioning Technician Project Manager Commissioning Technician Commissioning Technician Power Technician Power Technician 2X Logistics Coordinators Lead Technician Business Development Manager
- 24. Project timeline ▪ Agreed upon online date ▪ Project schedule of ~7 to 23 days from delivery of first genset installation
- 25. Impact of reliability ▪ 4.38M tons/year ▪ 500 tons/hour ▪ Price: $30/ton average ▪ $15,000/hour What does downtime cost? $-360,000 $-720,000 $-1,080,000 $-1,200,000 $-1,000,000 $-800,000 $-600,000 $-400,000 $-200,000 $- 1 DAY 2 DAYS 3 DAYS
- 26. Value before the grid ▪ $300K/day ▪ $9M/month ▪ $99M in 11 months ▪ 4.38M tons/year Revenue 9 18 27 36 45 54 63 72 81 90 99 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov REVENUE VS COST ($m): 11 MONTHS 4.38 T/Yr (M) 1.75 T/Yr (M) Linear (Cost)
- 27. ▪ Remote Operations Center + boots on the ground ▪ Experienced technicians - monitoring specialists ▪ Proactive costly avoidance ▪ Affordable scheduled maintenance program
- 30. In an industry where no two operations are the same and where every dollar counts – you don’t want a rental company … you need an engineering partner ▪ Increased reliability ▪ Avoid costly downtime
- 31. aggreko.com Thank you, Mike Mayers What questions do you have? What can we help you with… ▪ Low-cost, more reliable alternatives ▪ Expert support ▪ Logistics ▪ Meeting your sustainability goals ▪ Operation and maintenance Mike.Mayers@aggreko.com 303.859.2009 15600 John F. Kennedy Blvd. Houston, TX 77032