Improvement Story session at the 2013 Saskatchewan Health Care Quality Summit. For more information about the summit, visit www.qualitysummit.ca. Follow @QualitySummit on Twitter.
Pooled referrals are quickly becoming a very popular choice among patients being referred to a specialist. Some Saskatchewan specialists that are using pooled referrals are reducing patient wait times by as much as a half.
Better Care
Corrine Jabs
4. Objectives
• Understand:
– The concept of pooled referrals
– The challenges encountered in implementing the
concept of pooled referrals
– The rewards and advantages of pooled referrals
11. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology December
2010
Saskatchewan Specialist Registry
0 0 7 14 14 21 28
365 365 365 365 365
A B C D E F G H I J K L
Days for elective gyne referral to be seen
12. Issues:
• Long waits for some patients and very short for some patients
• Referring docs do not have consistent information regarding
waiting lists.
• Overload of some offices, concerns about job security in
others
• Multiple requests for referral/lost referrals
• Redirected referrals due to overload
• Redirected referrals due to skill set
• No control over inflow when ill, on leave, etc.
• Don’t know overall capacity or backlog in the dept and can’t
predict manpower needs
13. • Demand = patient need
• Supply = capacity of the providers
• The trick is to balance these
16. Why Pooled Referrals?
• Patients, through the Patient First Review,
stated they want improved access and well
coordinated care.
• Pooled referrals is a strategy to reduce wait
time variability among a group of specialists
that perform similar procedures and helps
improve access
18. What did we want to do?
• Level the workload / Work as a team
• Determine our capacity and backlog as a group
• Reduce wait times for consultation
• Ensure patients are seen by the appropriate
specialist/subspecialist (skill task alignment)
• Ensure GPs and patients are kept informed about the
status of their referral and appointment
20. “Our Plan”
• As a Department, we agreed to adopt pooled
referrals as a quality improvement project to
streamline the referral process and improve patient
access to our specialists
• Patients now have a CHOICE:
1. they can select a particular specialist, or
2. they can choose to see the next available specialist able to
treat their condition
21. How did we get there?
• Sask Surgical Initiative – Pooled Referrals on Agenda Feb 2010
• Discussion – Dept Meeting, Grand Rounds, Suppers Dec 2010
– What were the advantages/disadvantage/risks?
– Effect on Dept, patients and our referring practitioner?
• Practice Matrix – who does what? – Feb 2011
• Referral form – essential for sorting, database – Feb 2011
• Family physician focus group – April 2011
• Business rules – agreement on how to work together –October 2011
• Referral Management System – single entry point/fax line; allocation
of referrals; development of database
• Launch April 30, 2012
• Measurement - ongoing
22. • We were eager to start
• We did not expect
perfection from the start
• We anticipated change and
challenges
• We are making changes
23. “Our Challenges”
• Unlike the other early adopters of pooled referrals, our 15
specialists do not share a single office
• Multiple offices multiple fax lines
• Consulting with GPs not an easy task
• Database and Referral Management Service did not exist
• Perfection was expected. People confused because they were
expecting this to be a traditional project. We used the PDSA
approach: moving from good to better over time
40. What is the Data telling us?
• Wait times for our department are coming down and
becoming more consistent.
• For obstetrics: women appear to value their
relationship with a particular specialist
• For urgent and elective gynecology issues: women
appear to want to have their issues addressed
quickly
• We do not need to pool all patients to see
improvement (~ 40% of obs, ~ 50% of gyne)
41. The Value of Data
• This data includes
• number of referrals received,
• reasons for referral,
• capacity of the department as a whole and
• data related to patient waits
42. The Value of Data
• For the first time ever, we have valuable data about
our entire department’s workload
• This data is already proving to be a valuable planning
tool for further quality improvement and access
initiatives in our department
43. The Value of Data
• Outliers and anomalies can be identified
• countermeasures can be determined
44. Who is/will be pooling referrals?
Department Region No. of Surgeons “Go Live” Date
Orthopedics PAPRHA 4 Live Mar 19, 2012
Ob/gyn RQHR 15 Live -April 30, 2012
Neurosurgery** RQHR 5 Live - June 23, 2011
Neurosurgery** SHR 5 Live -June 23, 2011
General Surgery PAPRHA 5 Live -Nov 22, 2012
Ob/gyn* SHR 9 Live Jan 12, 2013
Thoracic Surgery SHR 3 Self-initiated
Vascular Surgery SHR 4 Self-initiated
Urology SHR 7 Self-initiated
Vascular Surgery RQHR 3 Self-initiated
Cardio-thoracic RQHR 3 Self-initiated
Ob/gyn FHHR 3 Spring 2013
Ob/gyn PNHR 3 Spring 2013
General Surgery PNHR 4 Spring 2013
Plastics SHR 4 Summer 2013
Cardiology SHR 13 Summer 2013
* A group practice of 9 surgeons
** Back pain patients are pooled through the spine pathway, includes several orthopedic
surgeons