Abstract
I claim that Mars immigrated from his original Point at orbital distance =84 mkm to dwell in his point at orbital distance 227.9 mkm..
And this immigration causes the following results:
1- A disturbance for the planet diameter and orbital distance relationship (which is proven clearly from the solar planets order)
2- Pluto Immigration, because Pluto had to move to the Solar group End where he before belonged to the inner planets.
This study tries to prove these facts
Also I provide in this Study my suggested description for the solar group.
Introduction
The solar planets order tells us clearly that there's a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance… this conclusion we get easily from the following planets order:
Mercury – Venus – Earth..
The previous planets order tells us a clear rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Something was happened with Mars
After Mars this rule is reversed as we see in the following planets:
Jupiter – Saturn - Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The rule became "Planet Greater Diameter has A Shorter Orbital Distance"
(Please Note/ Uranus greater in diameter and less in Mass from Neptune that tells us the planets order depends on their diameters and NOT on their Masses)
What happened with Mars?
Mars immigration from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
Let's return Mars to his original point at orbital distance = 84 mkm
What the solar planets order will be:
Mercury – Mars - Venus – Earth..
This follows completely the rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Based on this description there are 2 planets at least immigrated from their original points:
1- Mars immigrated from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
2- Pluto who belonged before to the solar inner planets (my hypothesis) and had to move to the End of the solar group because the rule became reversed… \
This paper tries to prove these facts
To do that we have to prove the following:
1- Mars moved from his original point (Mars is exceptional Planet)
2- Pluto belonged before to the solar inner planets..
This paper contains 2 points
3- Mars Original orbital distance was 84 mkm
4- An Alternative Solar Group Description
Abstract
I claim that Mars immigrated from his original Point at orbital distance =84 mkm to dwell in his point at orbital distance 227.9 mkm..
And this immigration causes the following results:
1- A disturbance for the planet diameter and orbital distance relationship (which is proven clearly from the solar planets order)
2- Pluto Immigration, because Pluto had to move to the Solar group End where he before belonged to the inner planets.
This study tries to prove these facts
Also I provide in this Study my suggested description for the solar group.
Introduction
The solar planets order tells us clearly that there's a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance… this conclusion we get easily from the following planets order:
Mercury – Venus – Earth..
The previous planets order tells us a clear rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Something was happened with Mars
After Mars this rule is reversed as we see in the following planets:
Jupiter – Saturn - Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The rule became "Planet Greater Diameter has A Shorter Orbital Distance"
(Please Note/ Uranus greater in diameter and less in Mass from Neptune that tells us the planets order depends on their diameters and NOT on their Masses)
What happened with Mars?
Mars immigration from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
Let's return Mars to his original point at orbital distance = 84 mkm
What the solar planets order will be:
Mercury – Mars - Venus – Earth..
This follows completely the rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Based on this description there are 2 planets at least immigrated from their original points:
1- Mars immigrated from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
2- Pluto who belonged before to the solar inner planets (my hypothesis) and had to move to the End of the solar group because the rule became reversed… \
This paper tries to prove these facts
To do that we have to prove the following:
1- Mars moved from his original point (Mars is exceptional Planet)
2- Pluto belonged before to the solar inner planets..
This paper contains 2 points
3- Mars Original orbital distance was 84 mkm
4- An Alternative Solar Group Description
Theory of Matter Creation supposes that, the matter is bright fringes and the distance is dark fringes..
i.e.
The planet is bright fringes and his orbital distance is dark fringes both of them are created from the same light coherence that explains the planet diameter and his orbital distance relationship…
Please review
Solar Group Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
This study tries to answer the question "How does the planet move?" let's summarize the answer in following:
- The planet is created and connected with a light beam..
- So this light beam moves firstly
- Then the Planet moves following this light beam with different rate of time (the planet original motion)
- This motion (action) has a reaction (another motion) which =99% of the original one
i.e.
- The planet motion contains 3 motions together (the light beam motion- the planet original motion and the planet reacted motion which =99% of the original one) (hypothesis)
- Do these 3 motions of the solar planet interpret the planet 3 cycles (Planet rotation cycle – Planet day – Planet orbital period)?
This paper discusses this idea trying to prove it…
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (II)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's an interaction between Earth and Jupiter Motions
The hypothesis Explanation
- What does mean "an interaction of motions"?
- I have searched for a suitable word to explain a dependency of motions data for both planets on one another - and I have choose the word "Interaction"
- Earth and Jupiter motions data depend on Each other – that means- I can write Jupiter motion detailed data by analysis Earth Motion Data –
- The paper will discuss that as deep as possible to prove this point of view
- But how does that happen?
- The "Interaction of Motions" disproves the description supposes that the solar planets are separated rigid bodies revolve around the sun, each planet creation and motion data is independent from the others. "This description is incorrect"
- The solar planets are created from one trajectory of energy (or from one light beam) which had created the planet and its orbital distance to be complementary with the other planets data to create the general harmony of motions – that means- the solar group is one geometrical building and each planet is a part of it
- "The Motions Interaction" is a method to examine the planets creation and motion data origin and to answer (how this data be created)?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
C2= 90000 mkmm (my claim)
90000 mkm = 86400 mkm +3413 mkm +187 mkm
We continue our discussion concerning the solar group main equation…
The Equation tells new information:
1- The Planet Motion depends on the solar group geometrical structure and not on the gravity forces.
2- Metonic and Saros Cycles both of them originated from the same source which causes their relationship and dependency
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (III)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Planet Day Period Definition : The Period Through Which The Planet Moves A Distance = Its Circumference.
Paper Question No. (1)
Is There An Interaction Between The Earth Moon & Jupiter Motions?
- Because
- Jupiter Diameter 142984 = The Earth Moon Circumference 10921 km x 13.1
- Where
- 13.1 km /sec = Jupiter Velocity …………And
- 13.18 degrees = the Earth moon motion degrees per solar day
- Shortly
- Are these 2 values (13.1 and 13.18) created depending on each other
- Which proves an interaction between Jupiter & the Earth moon Velocities
Paper Question No. (2)
If This interaction is found, can it effect on both Planets Days Periods?
- The paper discusses these questions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)Gerges francis
This paper discusses Mercury Data to prove 3 conclusions which are:
1- The solar group is one machine, each planet is a gear in this same machine. (i.e. each solar planet depends on other solar planets in his Origin And Motion).
2- Mercury Data shows a relationship with Jupiter can't be explained by gravity concept or any current theory. (i.e. The Solar Group Current Theory Is Insufficient)
3- Special Theory of Relativity provides empirical results only and need a theoretical extension to be a complete theory. (Specifically, the theory needs to explain why the lorentz length contraction phenomenon is done and what geometrical effect it practices)
The paper also suggest the following idea
"The Time existence depends on relativistic effects"
i.e.
"Time Definition" is a process extends beyond the human daily experiences
This paper completes the previous discussion
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)Gerges francis
Abstract
Mercury Day = 4222.6 hours, Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours and Mercury orbital period = 88 days
I claim the following:
- These three cycles are related to each other
- These three cycles depend on Jupiter Uranus distance (2095 mkm)
- Please remember that, Earth moon Metonic Cycle also depends on Jupiter Uranus distance which makes these 4 cycles are related to each other
By proving the previous claim I try to support my basic claim in all my papers that:
The Solar Group is one machine or one body, each planet should be considered as a gear in this machine or as a member in this body.
i.e.
No Planet Motion is Found Independent From Other Planets Motions
Paper Questions
How to describe the Moon Motion Trajectory?
Let's review our conclusions in following:
- The research 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- The research 2nd one (light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day)
- The 2nd hypothesis tells that there are different rates of time in the solar system,
- The basic rule tells (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
The Moon Orbital Motion Trajectory:
- Earth moves per solar day a distance =2.58 million km with an angle =0.985 deg on the horizontal line, the moon moves a very similar motion to Earth motion
- If there's no (Lorentz Length Contraction phenomenon) in the solar system, the moon motion would be as a parallel line to Earth motion trajectory … but
- Because of the contraction rate (1.0725) the moon motion distance daily (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be 2.41 mkm
- The difference (2.58 mkm -2.41 mkm) is a distance required necessary to be added to the moon motion distance to save the moon and Earth motions accompanying.
- 0.17 mkm is required to be passed daily
- The moon moves daily a displacement =88000 km depending on Earth Gravity
- But, Earth Mass = The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total (error 1%)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
I claim that Mars immigrated from his original Point at orbital distance =84 mkm to dwell in his point at orbital distance 227.9 mkm..
And this immigration causes the following results:
1- A disturbance for the planet diameter and orbital distance relationship (which is proven clearly from the solar planets order)
2- Pluto Immigration, because Pluto had to move to the Solar group End where he before belonged to the inner planets.
This study tries to prove these facts
Also I provide in this Study my suggested description for the solar group.
Introduction
The solar planets order tells us clearly that there's a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance… this conclusion we get easily from the following planets order:
Mercury – Venus – Earth..
The previous planets order tells us a clear rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Something was happened with Mars
After Mars this rule is reversed as we see in the following planets:
Jupiter – Saturn - Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The rule became "Planet Greater Diameter has A Shorter Orbital Distance"
(Please Note/ Uranus greater in diameter and less in Mass from Neptune that tells us the planets order depends on their diameters and NOT on their Masses)
What happened with Mars?
Mars immigration from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
Let's return Mars to his original point at orbital distance = 84 mkm
What the solar planets order will be:
Mercury – Mars - Venus – Earth..
This follows completely the rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Based on this description there are 2 planets at least immigrated from their original points:
1- Mars immigrated from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
2- Pluto who belonged before to the solar inner planets (my hypothesis) and had to move to the End of the solar group because the rule became reversed… \
This paper tries to prove these facts
To do that we have to prove the following:
1- Mars moved from his original point (Mars is exceptional Planet)
2- Pluto belonged before to the solar inner planets..
This paper contains 2 points
3- Mars Original orbital distance was 84 mkm
4- An Alternative Solar Group Description
Theory of Matter Creation supposes that, the matter is bright fringes and the distance is dark fringes..
i.e.
The planet is bright fringes and his orbital distance is dark fringes both of them are created from the same light coherence that explains the planet diameter and his orbital distance relationship…
Please review
Solar Group Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
This study tries to answer the question "How does the planet move?" let's summarize the answer in following:
- The planet is created and connected with a light beam..
- So this light beam moves firstly
- Then the Planet moves following this light beam with different rate of time (the planet original motion)
- This motion (action) has a reaction (another motion) which =99% of the original one
i.e.
- The planet motion contains 3 motions together (the light beam motion- the planet original motion and the planet reacted motion which =99% of the original one) (hypothesis)
- Do these 3 motions of the solar planet interpret the planet 3 cycles (Planet rotation cycle – Planet day – Planet orbital period)?
This paper discusses this idea trying to prove it…
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (II)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's an interaction between Earth and Jupiter Motions
The hypothesis Explanation
- What does mean "an interaction of motions"?
- I have searched for a suitable word to explain a dependency of motions data for both planets on one another - and I have choose the word "Interaction"
- Earth and Jupiter motions data depend on Each other – that means- I can write Jupiter motion detailed data by analysis Earth Motion Data –
- The paper will discuss that as deep as possible to prove this point of view
- But how does that happen?
- The "Interaction of Motions" disproves the description supposes that the solar planets are separated rigid bodies revolve around the sun, each planet creation and motion data is independent from the others. "This description is incorrect"
- The solar planets are created from one trajectory of energy (or from one light beam) which had created the planet and its orbital distance to be complementary with the other planets data to create the general harmony of motions – that means- the solar group is one geometrical building and each planet is a part of it
- "The Motions Interaction" is a method to examine the planets creation and motion data origin and to answer (how this data be created)?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
C2= 90000 mkmm (my claim)
90000 mkm = 86400 mkm +3413 mkm +187 mkm
We continue our discussion concerning the solar group main equation…
The Equation tells new information:
1- The Planet Motion depends on the solar group geometrical structure and not on the gravity forces.
2- Metonic and Saros Cycles both of them originated from the same source which causes their relationship and dependency
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (III)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Planet Day Period Definition : The Period Through Which The Planet Moves A Distance = Its Circumference.
Paper Question No. (1)
Is There An Interaction Between The Earth Moon & Jupiter Motions?
- Because
- Jupiter Diameter 142984 = The Earth Moon Circumference 10921 km x 13.1
- Where
- 13.1 km /sec = Jupiter Velocity …………And
- 13.18 degrees = the Earth moon motion degrees per solar day
- Shortly
- Are these 2 values (13.1 and 13.18) created depending on each other
- Which proves an interaction between Jupiter & the Earth moon Velocities
Paper Question No. (2)
If This interaction is found, can it effect on both Planets Days Periods?
- The paper discusses these questions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)Gerges francis
This paper discusses Mercury Data to prove 3 conclusions which are:
1- The solar group is one machine, each planet is a gear in this same machine. (i.e. each solar planet depends on other solar planets in his Origin And Motion).
2- Mercury Data shows a relationship with Jupiter can't be explained by gravity concept or any current theory. (i.e. The Solar Group Current Theory Is Insufficient)
3- Special Theory of Relativity provides empirical results only and need a theoretical extension to be a complete theory. (Specifically, the theory needs to explain why the lorentz length contraction phenomenon is done and what geometrical effect it practices)
The paper also suggest the following idea
"The Time existence depends on relativistic effects"
i.e.
"Time Definition" is a process extends beyond the human daily experiences
This paper completes the previous discussion
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)Gerges francis
Abstract
Mercury Day = 4222.6 hours, Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours and Mercury orbital period = 88 days
I claim the following:
- These three cycles are related to each other
- These three cycles depend on Jupiter Uranus distance (2095 mkm)
- Please remember that, Earth moon Metonic Cycle also depends on Jupiter Uranus distance which makes these 4 cycles are related to each other
By proving the previous claim I try to support my basic claim in all my papers that:
The Solar Group is one machine or one body, each planet should be considered as a gear in this machine or as a member in this body.
i.e.
No Planet Motion is Found Independent From Other Planets Motions
Paper Questions
How to describe the Moon Motion Trajectory?
Let's review our conclusions in following:
- The research 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- The research 2nd one (light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day)
- The 2nd hypothesis tells that there are different rates of time in the solar system,
- The basic rule tells (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
The Moon Orbital Motion Trajectory:
- Earth moves per solar day a distance =2.58 million km with an angle =0.985 deg on the horizontal line, the moon moves a very similar motion to Earth motion
- If there's no (Lorentz Length Contraction phenomenon) in the solar system, the moon motion would be as a parallel line to Earth motion trajectory … but
- Because of the contraction rate (1.0725) the moon motion distance daily (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be 2.41 mkm
- The difference (2.58 mkm -2.41 mkm) is a distance required necessary to be added to the moon motion distance to save the moon and Earth motions accompanying.
- 0.17 mkm is required to be passed daily
- The moon moves daily a displacement =88000 km depending on Earth Gravity
- But, Earth Mass = The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total (error 1%)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Moon Orbital Distance Is Proportional To Its Parent Circumference
-This hypothesis is suggested by the previous observation, which are
o Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference
o Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
o Neptune moves during its day period a distance = 2 x circumferences
o Uranus moves during its day period a distance = 2.6 x circumferences
- This observations lead us to conclude that, Planet motion may depend on its circumference or the motion distance be function of the planet circumference..
- Then, the moon orbital radiuses analysis lead us to conclude this hypothesis, this paper tries to prove it
- By the hypothesis prove, many other old claims can be supported in addition, let's write them down here:
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth velocity daily (2.58 mkm) = Pluto velocity daily (0.406 mkm) x 2π
The previous relationship is found based on 2 reasons –at least- which are:
1- Earth and Pluto are the 2 ends of the solar group main energy trajectory.
2- Earth and Pluto Relationship is found through the moon orbit (Earth moon orbit)
This paper tries to prove these facts.
Paper Hypothesis
The Planet Orbital Inclination Defines The Planet Internal Distances
The Hypothesis Explanation
This hypothesis tells that – for example – Jupiter orbital inclination =1.3 degrees because
There are 2 other planets – the distances of these planets to Jupiter = 1: 1.3
And
Because these 2 distances are so effective in Jupiter Data Creation and Motion – for that – Jupiter orbital inclination is created as a result of these 2 distances rate
For Better Explanation
- Mercury Jupiter Distance =720.7 mkm
- Mars Jupiter Distance =550.7 mkm
And
- 720.7 mkm = 1.3 x 550.7 mkm
- The hypothesis tells that – Jupiter orbital inclination (1.3 degrees) is created based on these 2 distances
The paper tries to prove this fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Total Solar Eclipse Geometrical Analysis Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
Jupiter Provides Us The Chance To See The Total Solar Eclipse
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc?
Because
(The sun diameter / the moon diameter) = (Earth orbital distance/ Earth Moon distance)
Jupiter causes to make the (sun/moon) diameters rate = their distances rate to the Earth
How? Because
Jupiter effects on the Earth and its moon creation data to be in consistency with the previous equation
Means – Jupiter causes the moon diameter to be created as (1/400 the sun diameter) and also Jupiter causes the Earth orbital distance to be = (1/400) Earth Moon Distance
These results are produced by Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation.
The paper tries to prove this fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- I have discovered The Earth Moon Basic Equation
- I call it (Gerges equation for the moon orbital motion)
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- I claim, the moon original motion is an identical to The Earth one, i.e. the moon moves daily a distance 2.58 mkm with an angle 0.985 deg. on the horizontal line.
- The moon motion daily rest angle (13.18 deg -0.985 deg= 12.195deg), it's created by of the moon daily displacement (88000 km)
- The moon daily motion depends on the angle (0.985 deg) as Earth motion, each day Earth adds (0.985 deg) to its revolution around the sun (till 360 degrees)
- But, Why the moon uses (The angle θ) in its motion? because
- The moon daily displacement (88000km) isn't used as a real displacement through the moon orbit, instead, the moon uses this value (88000 km) to create another real displacement suitable with the moon orbit radius… because of that, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its motion. the moon displacement (88000km) will be used as the right triangle hypotenuse, where the real displacement is (L =88000 cos θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
-Planet diameter (or circumference) is created as a function in another planet diameter and velocity
The hypothesis explanation
- By this technique the produced planet diameter will be in harmony with the parent one, and accordingly, will be in harmony with all other planets diameters, circumferences and motions
- This harmony is a necessary to guarantee the planets motions general harmony..
- Planet diameter creation depending on another planet diameter and velocity, is done by A Motion Transportation Process, and by that planet diameter is created in harmony with its velocity and day period
Based on this concept we can explain the following data
- Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
- Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (-1.2%)
- Neptune moves during its day period a distance = its circumference x 2
- This specific data is produced as results for the motion transportation process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
-The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets.
The hypothesis explanation
-The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km
-Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during (153.3 h) a distance = 2593836 km
-Why These Distances Are Equal?
-How the motion at distance be done? or by what geometrical mechanism the masses gravity causes a motion at distance? These questions still need answers
- The motion transportation among the planets can be answer for these questions.
- What does mean "A motion Transportation"?
- It means, a planet motion causes another planet to move, and this motion depends on the planet motion and not on its masses gravity only. That tells, the motion transportation process must be done based on new geometrical rules.
- If the paper hypothesis is true and the motion is transported among the solar planets, that will answer why these 2 distances are equal? Because the motion is transported from one planet to another and by that the 2 planets move equal distances in defined periods of time.
Paper objective
- The paper tries to prove that, the motion is transported from a planet to another planet through the solar system and this motion transportation caused Pluto motion distance during its day period to be = the moon displacements total
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- The Energy is found alone before any Matter Creation
- A general Energy is found before the solar planets creation (I called this Energy "The Mother Energy")
- This mother Energy creates the solar planets matters (Mass) and orbital distances (Space)
- The Mother Energy forces the solar planet to move following her motion, So the planet follows the Energy Motion trajectory (with different rate of time)
That answers the question
- Why Earth circumference =40080 km?
Paper Objective
The Moon Motion Trajectory Rules Definition
- There 3 basic rules are known in the moon motion trajectory, which can help us in our investigation to discover the moon motion trajectory…
- The 1st rule
o "There Is Another Force Equal Earth Gravity Force Effect On The Moon Motion Trajectory, This force Is expressed By point (A) in The moon orbital triangle, This Point (A) is found beyond apogee point with 43000 km, i.e. The distance between the Earth and this point (A) = 449000 km"
- The 2nd rule
o The moon orbital triangle shows that, the moon motion 4 basic radius (which are Perigee, Apogee, total solar eclipse, and the orbital distance), these 4 points are defined based on each other by using Pythagoras rule (the Pythagoras equation should use the term 86000 km as a right triangle dimension and the other dimension should be any radius of the 4 radiuses and the result will be another radius of them) – so is this the way by which the moon move? i.e. does the moon move through its motion trajectory based on Pythagoras rule?)
- The 3r rule
o The Cycle 1290 days of the moon motion, this cycle gives us a clear light about how the moon moves through its orbital motion trajectory
- Because we know the rules No 1 and 3, the paper will discuss only the rule no. 3 and review both old rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planets Motions Concept
1 Second Of Light Motion Causes 1 Solar Day Of Planet Motion
i.e.
Planet Motion depends on Light Motion
Or
Planet is a result of light Motion
Where
Planet & light Motion Interactions depends on this concept
1 Second Of Light Motion Causes 1 Solar Day Of Planet Motion
Which this paper tries to prove
This paper completes the discussion in the previous one
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Let's remember our main argument in this papers series "Matter Creation Principle"
I have claimed the following:
(1) Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second period only
(2) Light Motion for 1Second causes Planet to move for 1 solar day
(3) Based on Planet motion for 1 solar day – Solar Planets are created…
(4) Specifically – Pluto motion for 1 solar day is a result of light motion for 1 second period (light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec) and based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day – the planets diameters are created that's why Pluto Motion Distance Daily = 406000 km= Planets Diameters Total
But
(5) We have discovered that Earth Moon Orbit defines solar Planets diameters Where
a. Apogee Radius = Solar Planets Diameters Total
b. Perigee Radius = Outer Planets Diameters Total
c. Apogee–Perigee Distance =inner planets diameters total =Earth Circumference
(6) Based on the previous data we have concluded that (1st Conclusion) Pluto and Earth Moon together effect on Solar Planets Diameters Creation process (2nd Conclusion) light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec is sent from Pluto to Earth causes the Earth Axial Tilt (23.45degrees)
Also
(7) We have discovered that 2 Jupiter Diameters +1 Saturn Diameter = Solar Planets Diameters Total =406000 km
(8) i.e. Jupiter Diameter = 8 Planets Diameters Total
(9) These relationships are depended also on light beam velocity 1.16 mkm /sec
What we need to do in this paper?
The previous claim is a heavy one, so we need to discuss (1st) More Proves & Details (2nd) How does this machine work?
Let's start immediately…
Please Note
Paper Methodology is mentioned in "Matter Creation Principle (Part III)"
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current descriptionGerges francis
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Mars Immigration Theory Summary:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm but Mars was immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from the point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars had collided with Venus (at first) and then collided also with Earth (at second)
- From these collisions debris Earth Moon was created and Mars created its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter and created the asteroid belt
Based on that
- Mars was the planet which collided with Earth and Not Theia (Theia impact) as the Giant-Impact Hypothesis suggests
The theory answers many questions to improve the Giant –impact hypothesis:
(1st Question) Why Venus has no moon spite it had a similar collision?
Because Mars was moving from the point (84 mkm) to the point (227.9 mkm) – So Mars pushed all debris to move with it in the same motion direction – Mars had created a wave to push all debris far from Venues toward Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)- for that reason Venus Couldn't Create A Moon – but Earth has A Greater Mass and the Debris Lost Their Motion High Momentum at Earth – so Earth could created its moon from these debris
(2nd Question) The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?!
The Origin Of This Ocean Is Venus and by that – the mystery is solved easily – the moon rocks are consisted of 3 planets rocks which are Venus – Earth - Mars – and because of that the 3 planets rocks are seen among the moon rocks.
(3rd Question) why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)?
The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%) because the moon is created by all of them.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus is perpendicular on earth moon orbit (viii) (revised)Gerges francis
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VIII) (revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The moon and Pluto motions are transported from one to another through the solar planets motions.
Paper Investigation
- We analyze the moon orbital triangle to see this motion transportation
Paper conclusion
- Planet diameter is created based on this planet motion
- There's a transportation of motion between the Earth moon and Pluto.
- The planets do this motion transportation, that causes this motion features to be seen on all planets motions
- The argument proves that, the planets can't be considered as separated masses points, on the contrary they are knots in the same rope, where all solar planets are created from the same one trajectory of energy and move by it.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Velocity Is Defined As A Function Of Its Diameter (II)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon is created by effect of Uranus and Pluto motions
The hypothesis explanation
- Although the Earth moon is created by Planets collisions But
- The Earth moon data is created by an effect of light motion calculations
- That supports the conclusion that (light motion must be a companying with planet motion an effect on it)
Paper questions
- The paper tries to answer the following question
o Why Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days?
o Why Uranus motion distance during (5040 seconds)= Pluto motion distance during 7511 seconds.
Paper conclusion
- Light Motion Is Accompanying With Planet Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
There's Another Force Effects On The Moon Motion Trajectory
(This Force Is = Earth Gravity Force, and effect on the trajectory other side)
- I have discovered this force by analysis the Earth moon motion data,
- This Force Is Originated By The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total, (because the 4 inner planets masses total = Earth mass "with difference only 1%")
- And… because the planets are on far distances from the moon, I have concluded that, there's an electric field controls the inner planets and enable the 4 inner planets masses to practice its gravity on the moon motion trajectory
- This electric field depends on the planets different charges, where this electric field hypothesis is discussed in the previous paper…
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses the proves of this second force existence and effect on the moon motion trajectory, and analyzes this force point effect and its different properties.
- The paper also analyzes the moon motion trajectory, trying to discover it.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through HistoryGerges francis
I- The Paper Claim:
- The Solar Planets Order was (Pluto – Mercury – Mars ……..etc)
But
- Mars Ancient Orbital Distance was 84 millions km, found after Mercury Immediately….
- Pluto was before Mercury in order and nearer to the sun (or may Pluto was the Mercury Moon)
- This order I suggest based on the rule "Greater Diameter Needs Greater Orbital Distance". (This Rule Is Discussed In This Paper Introduction)
Then
- Mars immigrated and dwelt in its new point with orbital distance = 227.9 mkm.
- Mars Immigration was process has a great effect on the solar group especially on Pluto (the smallest planet). And As a result of it, Pluto also immigrated and dwelt in its new point with orbital distance =5870 mkm
- The Planet diameter and orbital distance rule is (A Greater Diameter needs A Greater Orbital Distance) is disturbed by Mars and Pluto Immigration.
- Mars is Exceptional Planet in different arguments because of its immigration..
I- The Claim Explanation:
How to prove this fact?
- The Solar Group is One Body (Building) – If this is a fact- So, Each Planet Data is created based on the other planets data –i.e. if Mars changed his orbital distance through the solar group history – This Change should be Registered in the solar planets data-
i.e.
- Mars Immigration Argument Is Another Proof For The Claim ….… "The Solar Group Is One Body and Each Planet is A Member Of It", Or "The Solar Group Is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building"…
Earth Motion
1- Abstract
Earth motion is one paper I have promised to write from years, just now I can do that!
Why have I promised but couldn't? ….the reason was the following…
- The moon orbital radius at total solar eclipse = 0.370 mkm, its circumference = 2.32 mkm = 58.6 x 40080 km (Earth Circumference)
- Now let's imagine:
- If the moon orbital circumference (2.32 mkm) is a great gear and the Earth circumference (40080 km) is a small gear …. Now let's these gears to rotate
- The great gear (2.32 mkm) needs to rotates (one time only), and that will causes the small gear to rotate 58.6 times, means Earth circumference will rotate around its axis 58.6 times but one rotation of Earth circumference means one solar day, so Earth will rotate (58.6 solar days).
- But ….Earth moves per solar day a distance = 2.58 million km
- 2.58 mkm x 58.6 days = 149.6 million km (Earth Orbital Distance)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Abstract
- A light travels with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec, passes a distance = Jupiter orbital circumference (4900 mkm) during a period =4224 seconds
- The period 4224 seconds is transported from the light motion at Jupiter orbital circumference to Mercury motion in form 4224 hours
- This transportation of period is done because Mercury receive its energy from Jupiter –as we have discussed before-
- So Mercury Day should be =4224 hours resulting of Jupiter effect on Mercury motion.
Why Mercury day = 4222.6 hours and Not 4224 hours?!
- Another Planet effected on Mercury motion and caused this change !
- This planet is Pluto
How to explain that??
- We know Mercury Energy =86400 mkm – which is sent from Jupiter
- 86400 mkm = 17.2 x 5040 (where 17.2 degrees = Pluto Orbital Inclination)
- That causes Mercury Day Period to be decreased with 5040 seconds
Are there any proof?
- Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels during 5040 seconds a distance = 5846mkm (=Mercury Pluto Distance)
But
- Mercury moves during 346.6 days (nodal year) a distance =1433.5 mkm (=Saturn orbital distance) but Mercury moves during 1433.5 mkm a distance = 5846 mkm (Mercury Pluto Distance) - Mercury motion is a series follows the light motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Best regards
Pluto was – The Mercury Moon –
I claim the following:
1- Pluto was – The Mercury Moon-
2- Pluto had to immigrate from his original point to his new point at orbital distance =5870 mkm because of Mars immigration
3- Mars original orbital distance = 84 mkm and he immigrated from this point to his current point at orbital distance = 227.9 mkm
4- Mercury day was 176 days and decreased by 84 minutes = 5040 seconds because of Mars Immigration
5- The solar planets, found before Mars Immigration were:
Pluto – Mercury- Mars – Earth- Jupiter – Uranus – Neptune (the order is incorrect)
6- The solar planets, created after Mars Immigration were:
Venus – Saturn – The Earth Moon – the Sun
"Pluto was The Mercury Moon" is a claim aims to supports the relationship between planet diameter and his orbital distance which supports the concept that "the Matter and distance are created together from the same Energy"
Contacts : Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
During 2013-2019 – I have studied the solar group geometry and discovered the following 5 Equations:
1- Planet Gravity Equation (Point 2-1)
2- Planet Orbital Distance Equation (Point 2-2)
3- Planet Diameter Equation (Point 2-3)
4- The Sun Rays Production Equation (Point 2-4)
5- Venus Diameter Equation (Point 2-5)
6- An Argument against The Big Bang Theory (Point 2-6)
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Moon Orbital Distance Is Proportional To Its Parent Circumference
-This hypothesis is suggested by the previous observation, which are
o Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference
o Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
o Neptune moves during its day period a distance = 2 x circumferences
o Uranus moves during its day period a distance = 2.6 x circumferences
- This observations lead us to conclude that, Planet motion may depend on its circumference or the motion distance be function of the planet circumference..
- Then, the moon orbital radiuses analysis lead us to conclude this hypothesis, this paper tries to prove it
- By the hypothesis prove, many other old claims can be supported in addition, let's write them down here:
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth velocity daily (2.58 mkm) = Pluto velocity daily (0.406 mkm) x 2π
The previous relationship is found based on 2 reasons –at least- which are:
1- Earth and Pluto are the 2 ends of the solar group main energy trajectory.
2- Earth and Pluto Relationship is found through the moon orbit (Earth moon orbit)
This paper tries to prove these facts.
Paper Hypothesis
The Planet Orbital Inclination Defines The Planet Internal Distances
The Hypothesis Explanation
This hypothesis tells that – for example – Jupiter orbital inclination =1.3 degrees because
There are 2 other planets – the distances of these planets to Jupiter = 1: 1.3
And
Because these 2 distances are so effective in Jupiter Data Creation and Motion – for that – Jupiter orbital inclination is created as a result of these 2 distances rate
For Better Explanation
- Mercury Jupiter Distance =720.7 mkm
- Mars Jupiter Distance =550.7 mkm
And
- 720.7 mkm = 1.3 x 550.7 mkm
- The hypothesis tells that – Jupiter orbital inclination (1.3 degrees) is created based on these 2 distances
The paper tries to prove this fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Total Solar Eclipse Geometrical Analysis Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
Jupiter Provides Us The Chance To See The Total Solar Eclipse
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc?
Because
(The sun diameter / the moon diameter) = (Earth orbital distance/ Earth Moon distance)
Jupiter causes to make the (sun/moon) diameters rate = their distances rate to the Earth
How? Because
Jupiter effects on the Earth and its moon creation data to be in consistency with the previous equation
Means – Jupiter causes the moon diameter to be created as (1/400 the sun diameter) and also Jupiter causes the Earth orbital distance to be = (1/400) Earth Moon Distance
These results are produced by Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation.
The paper tries to prove this fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- I have discovered The Earth Moon Basic Equation
- I call it (Gerges equation for the moon orbital motion)
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- I claim, the moon original motion is an identical to The Earth one, i.e. the moon moves daily a distance 2.58 mkm with an angle 0.985 deg. on the horizontal line.
- The moon motion daily rest angle (13.18 deg -0.985 deg= 12.195deg), it's created by of the moon daily displacement (88000 km)
- The moon daily motion depends on the angle (0.985 deg) as Earth motion, each day Earth adds (0.985 deg) to its revolution around the sun (till 360 degrees)
- But, Why the moon uses (The angle θ) in its motion? because
- The moon daily displacement (88000km) isn't used as a real displacement through the moon orbit, instead, the moon uses this value (88000 km) to create another real displacement suitable with the moon orbit radius… because of that, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its motion. the moon displacement (88000km) will be used as the right triangle hypotenuse, where the real displacement is (L =88000 cos θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
-Planet diameter (or circumference) is created as a function in another planet diameter and velocity
The hypothesis explanation
- By this technique the produced planet diameter will be in harmony with the parent one, and accordingly, will be in harmony with all other planets diameters, circumferences and motions
- This harmony is a necessary to guarantee the planets motions general harmony..
- Planet diameter creation depending on another planet diameter and velocity, is done by A Motion Transportation Process, and by that planet diameter is created in harmony with its velocity and day period
Based on this concept we can explain the following data
- Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
- Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (-1.2%)
- Neptune moves during its day period a distance = its circumference x 2
- This specific data is produced as results for the motion transportation process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
-The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets.
The hypothesis explanation
-The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km
-Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during (153.3 h) a distance = 2593836 km
-Why These Distances Are Equal?
-How the motion at distance be done? or by what geometrical mechanism the masses gravity causes a motion at distance? These questions still need answers
- The motion transportation among the planets can be answer for these questions.
- What does mean "A motion Transportation"?
- It means, a planet motion causes another planet to move, and this motion depends on the planet motion and not on its masses gravity only. That tells, the motion transportation process must be done based on new geometrical rules.
- If the paper hypothesis is true and the motion is transported among the solar planets, that will answer why these 2 distances are equal? Because the motion is transported from one planet to another and by that the 2 planets move equal distances in defined periods of time.
Paper objective
- The paper tries to prove that, the motion is transported from a planet to another planet through the solar system and this motion transportation caused Pluto motion distance during its day period to be = the moon displacements total
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- The Energy is found alone before any Matter Creation
- A general Energy is found before the solar planets creation (I called this Energy "The Mother Energy")
- This mother Energy creates the solar planets matters (Mass) and orbital distances (Space)
- The Mother Energy forces the solar planet to move following her motion, So the planet follows the Energy Motion trajectory (with different rate of time)
That answers the question
- Why Earth circumference =40080 km?
Paper Objective
The Moon Motion Trajectory Rules Definition
- There 3 basic rules are known in the moon motion trajectory, which can help us in our investigation to discover the moon motion trajectory…
- The 1st rule
o "There Is Another Force Equal Earth Gravity Force Effect On The Moon Motion Trajectory, This force Is expressed By point (A) in The moon orbital triangle, This Point (A) is found beyond apogee point with 43000 km, i.e. The distance between the Earth and this point (A) = 449000 km"
- The 2nd rule
o The moon orbital triangle shows that, the moon motion 4 basic radius (which are Perigee, Apogee, total solar eclipse, and the orbital distance), these 4 points are defined based on each other by using Pythagoras rule (the Pythagoras equation should use the term 86000 km as a right triangle dimension and the other dimension should be any radius of the 4 radiuses and the result will be another radius of them) – so is this the way by which the moon move? i.e. does the moon move through its motion trajectory based on Pythagoras rule?)
- The 3r rule
o The Cycle 1290 days of the moon motion, this cycle gives us a clear light about how the moon moves through its orbital motion trajectory
- Because we know the rules No 1 and 3, the paper will discuss only the rule no. 3 and review both old rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planets Motions Concept
1 Second Of Light Motion Causes 1 Solar Day Of Planet Motion
i.e.
Planet Motion depends on Light Motion
Or
Planet is a result of light Motion
Where
Planet & light Motion Interactions depends on this concept
1 Second Of Light Motion Causes 1 Solar Day Of Planet Motion
Which this paper tries to prove
This paper completes the discussion in the previous one
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Let's remember our main argument in this papers series "Matter Creation Principle"
I have claimed the following:
(1) Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second period only
(2) Light Motion for 1Second causes Planet to move for 1 solar day
(3) Based on Planet motion for 1 solar day – Solar Planets are created…
(4) Specifically – Pluto motion for 1 solar day is a result of light motion for 1 second period (light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec) and based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day – the planets diameters are created that's why Pluto Motion Distance Daily = 406000 km= Planets Diameters Total
But
(5) We have discovered that Earth Moon Orbit defines solar Planets diameters Where
a. Apogee Radius = Solar Planets Diameters Total
b. Perigee Radius = Outer Planets Diameters Total
c. Apogee–Perigee Distance =inner planets diameters total =Earth Circumference
(6) Based on the previous data we have concluded that (1st Conclusion) Pluto and Earth Moon together effect on Solar Planets Diameters Creation process (2nd Conclusion) light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec is sent from Pluto to Earth causes the Earth Axial Tilt (23.45degrees)
Also
(7) We have discovered that 2 Jupiter Diameters +1 Saturn Diameter = Solar Planets Diameters Total =406000 km
(8) i.e. Jupiter Diameter = 8 Planets Diameters Total
(9) These relationships are depended also on light beam velocity 1.16 mkm /sec
What we need to do in this paper?
The previous claim is a heavy one, so we need to discuss (1st) More Proves & Details (2nd) How does this machine work?
Let's start immediately…
Please Note
Paper Methodology is mentioned in "Matter Creation Principle (Part III)"
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current descriptionGerges francis
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Mars Immigration Theory Summary:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm but Mars was immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from the point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars had collided with Venus (at first) and then collided also with Earth (at second)
- From these collisions debris Earth Moon was created and Mars created its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter and created the asteroid belt
Based on that
- Mars was the planet which collided with Earth and Not Theia (Theia impact) as the Giant-Impact Hypothesis suggests
The theory answers many questions to improve the Giant –impact hypothesis:
(1st Question) Why Venus has no moon spite it had a similar collision?
Because Mars was moving from the point (84 mkm) to the point (227.9 mkm) – So Mars pushed all debris to move with it in the same motion direction – Mars had created a wave to push all debris far from Venues toward Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)- for that reason Venus Couldn't Create A Moon – but Earth has A Greater Mass and the Debris Lost Their Motion High Momentum at Earth – so Earth could created its moon from these debris
(2nd Question) The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?!
The Origin Of This Ocean Is Venus and by that – the mystery is solved easily – the moon rocks are consisted of 3 planets rocks which are Venus – Earth - Mars – and because of that the 3 planets rocks are seen among the moon rocks.
(3rd Question) why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)?
The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%) because the moon is created by all of them.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus is perpendicular on earth moon orbit (viii) (revised)Gerges francis
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VIII) (revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The moon and Pluto motions are transported from one to another through the solar planets motions.
Paper Investigation
- We analyze the moon orbital triangle to see this motion transportation
Paper conclusion
- Planet diameter is created based on this planet motion
- There's a transportation of motion between the Earth moon and Pluto.
- The planets do this motion transportation, that causes this motion features to be seen on all planets motions
- The argument proves that, the planets can't be considered as separated masses points, on the contrary they are knots in the same rope, where all solar planets are created from the same one trajectory of energy and move by it.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Velocity Is Defined As A Function Of Its Diameter (II)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon is created by effect of Uranus and Pluto motions
The hypothesis explanation
- Although the Earth moon is created by Planets collisions But
- The Earth moon data is created by an effect of light motion calculations
- That supports the conclusion that (light motion must be a companying with planet motion an effect on it)
Paper questions
- The paper tries to answer the following question
o Why Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days?
o Why Uranus motion distance during (5040 seconds)= Pluto motion distance during 7511 seconds.
Paper conclusion
- Light Motion Is Accompanying With Planet Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
There's Another Force Effects On The Moon Motion Trajectory
(This Force Is = Earth Gravity Force, and effect on the trajectory other side)
- I have discovered this force by analysis the Earth moon motion data,
- This Force Is Originated By The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total, (because the 4 inner planets masses total = Earth mass "with difference only 1%")
- And… because the planets are on far distances from the moon, I have concluded that, there's an electric field controls the inner planets and enable the 4 inner planets masses to practice its gravity on the moon motion trajectory
- This electric field depends on the planets different charges, where this electric field hypothesis is discussed in the previous paper…
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses the proves of this second force existence and effect on the moon motion trajectory, and analyzes this force point effect and its different properties.
- The paper also analyzes the moon motion trajectory, trying to discover it.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through HistoryGerges francis
I- The Paper Claim:
- The Solar Planets Order was (Pluto – Mercury – Mars ……..etc)
But
- Mars Ancient Orbital Distance was 84 millions km, found after Mercury Immediately….
- Pluto was before Mercury in order and nearer to the sun (or may Pluto was the Mercury Moon)
- This order I suggest based on the rule "Greater Diameter Needs Greater Orbital Distance". (This Rule Is Discussed In This Paper Introduction)
Then
- Mars immigrated and dwelt in its new point with orbital distance = 227.9 mkm.
- Mars Immigration was process has a great effect on the solar group especially on Pluto (the smallest planet). And As a result of it, Pluto also immigrated and dwelt in its new point with orbital distance =5870 mkm
- The Planet diameter and orbital distance rule is (A Greater Diameter needs A Greater Orbital Distance) is disturbed by Mars and Pluto Immigration.
- Mars is Exceptional Planet in different arguments because of its immigration..
I- The Claim Explanation:
How to prove this fact?
- The Solar Group is One Body (Building) – If this is a fact- So, Each Planet Data is created based on the other planets data –i.e. if Mars changed his orbital distance through the solar group history – This Change should be Registered in the solar planets data-
i.e.
- Mars Immigration Argument Is Another Proof For The Claim ….… "The Solar Group Is One Body and Each Planet is A Member Of It", Or "The Solar Group Is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building"…
Earth Motion
1- Abstract
Earth motion is one paper I have promised to write from years, just now I can do that!
Why have I promised but couldn't? ….the reason was the following…
- The moon orbital radius at total solar eclipse = 0.370 mkm, its circumference = 2.32 mkm = 58.6 x 40080 km (Earth Circumference)
- Now let's imagine:
- If the moon orbital circumference (2.32 mkm) is a great gear and the Earth circumference (40080 km) is a small gear …. Now let's these gears to rotate
- The great gear (2.32 mkm) needs to rotates (one time only), and that will causes the small gear to rotate 58.6 times, means Earth circumference will rotate around its axis 58.6 times but one rotation of Earth circumference means one solar day, so Earth will rotate (58.6 solar days).
- But ….Earth moves per solar day a distance = 2.58 million km
- 2.58 mkm x 58.6 days = 149.6 million km (Earth Orbital Distance)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Abstract
- A light travels with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec, passes a distance = Jupiter orbital circumference (4900 mkm) during a period =4224 seconds
- The period 4224 seconds is transported from the light motion at Jupiter orbital circumference to Mercury motion in form 4224 hours
- This transportation of period is done because Mercury receive its energy from Jupiter –as we have discussed before-
- So Mercury Day should be =4224 hours resulting of Jupiter effect on Mercury motion.
Why Mercury day = 4222.6 hours and Not 4224 hours?!
- Another Planet effected on Mercury motion and caused this change !
- This planet is Pluto
How to explain that??
- We know Mercury Energy =86400 mkm – which is sent from Jupiter
- 86400 mkm = 17.2 x 5040 (where 17.2 degrees = Pluto Orbital Inclination)
- That causes Mercury Day Period to be decreased with 5040 seconds
Are there any proof?
- Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels during 5040 seconds a distance = 5846mkm (=Mercury Pluto Distance)
But
- Mercury moves during 346.6 days (nodal year) a distance =1433.5 mkm (=Saturn orbital distance) but Mercury moves during 1433.5 mkm a distance = 5846 mkm (Mercury Pluto Distance) - Mercury motion is a series follows the light motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Best regards
Pluto was – The Mercury Moon –
I claim the following:
1- Pluto was – The Mercury Moon-
2- Pluto had to immigrate from his original point to his new point at orbital distance =5870 mkm because of Mars immigration
3- Mars original orbital distance = 84 mkm and he immigrated from this point to his current point at orbital distance = 227.9 mkm
4- Mercury day was 176 days and decreased by 84 minutes = 5040 seconds because of Mars Immigration
5- The solar planets, found before Mars Immigration were:
Pluto – Mercury- Mars – Earth- Jupiter – Uranus – Neptune (the order is incorrect)
6- The solar planets, created after Mars Immigration were:
Venus – Saturn – The Earth Moon – the Sun
"Pluto was The Mercury Moon" is a claim aims to supports the relationship between planet diameter and his orbital distance which supports the concept that "the Matter and distance are created together from the same Energy"
Contacts : Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
During 2013-2019 – I have studied the solar group geometry and discovered the following 5 Equations:
1- Planet Gravity Equation (Point 2-1)
2- Planet Orbital Distance Equation (Point 2-2)
3- Planet Diameter Equation (Point 2-3)
4- The Sun Rays Production Equation (Point 2-4)
5- Venus Diameter Equation (Point 2-5)
6- An Argument against The Big Bang Theory (Point 2-6)
The main hypothesis
"The Solar Group is created from one Energy, where this Energy creates the planet matter and his orbital distance, so the solar group can be similar to one body and each planet is considered as a member in this body. That means, the solar planets existence depends on their cooperation with each other".
The solar Group energy is defined by the following Equation
C2 = 90000 mkm = 86400 mkm +3600 mkm
(c= light velocity = 300000 km/sec and c2 is the squared value)
The previous Equation expresses the solar group main Energy
This paper studies only this Equation to prove the main hypothesis…
Abstract
Solar Group Creation And Motion
(A description which this paper tries to prove)
1- The Solar System Is created of one energy only - this one energy travels through the solar group from point to another point – creating the planet matter (because E=mc2) and planet orbital distance (because Space = Energy- My Hypothesis).
2- The Solar System Main Energy starts from Jupiter and travels to Pluto (from this energy Neptune orbital circumference is created consuming 16% of the total energy)
3- Neptune reflects the rest of energy toward the inner planets into 2 equal trajectories of energy
4- The Energy is sent from Neptune (and Pluto) to Mercury
5- Energy is sent from Mercury to Saturn
6- Pluto Motion specifically for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second (where this moving light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec – my hypothesis) – that means – 1 second of light motion causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
7- Solar group is created based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day (solar planets diameters total = 406000km= Pluto motion for 1 solar day)
8- Planets motions energies accumulations with 2 other factor effects – lead to produce the sun light beams… these 2 factors are
a. The sun rate of time is different from Earth one
b. Jupiter Energy Interaction with the planets velocities total
9- i.e. Planets Motions energies total produce the sun rays based on changing the sun rate of time and the interaction with Jupiter energy
10- The produce light beam will be 0.3 mkm/second but the original one is 1.16 mkm/sec – for that – the value 0.3 will multiply with 4……(0.3x4 =1.2 mkm/sec from this value the original light beam 1.16 mkm/sec is produced) (Why it multiplies with 4 - because earth has a cycle of 4 years – 1461 days)
11- The final product will be 1.16 mkm/sec moves for 1 second only to repeat the cycle for tomorrow…
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Mars ancient orbital distance was 84 mkm and changed to be 227.9 mkm later.
The hypothesis explanation
- Mars was the next planet after Mercury with orbital distance =84 mkm and Mars had migrated into Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)
- Through Mars Displacement from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), Mars had collided with Venus and then with Earth and then reach to its current orbital distance point
- By these collisions debris the Earth could create its own moon and also Mars moons are created in addition to the asteroid belt.
- Means, Mars itself caused the Earth moon creation by its Migration in place of the Planet (Theia) supposed by the Giant-impact hypothesis.
- Mars Migration theory answers the Giant-impact hypothesis questions, are:
- What's The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?– It's Venus
- Why Venus couldn't create its own moon from the collisions debris? Because Mars had moved from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), So Mars had pushed all debris in its motion direction because of that Venus found no debris around it to create its own moon, But Earth gravity is grater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their motion momentum, because of that Earth could create its own moon.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (III)Gerges francis
The Giant-impact hypothesis suggests that, The Earth Moon is formed from the ejects of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planet…etc
I suggest the following theory:
- Mars itself had collided The Earth and not another planet. how that is happened?
- Mars original orbital distance =84 mkm, and Mars had to move from it to its new orbital distance =227.9 mkm – i.e. - Mars had to move from 84 mk to 227.9 mk.
- Through Mars motion – Mars had collided Venus (at first) and Earth (at Second)
- Mars had moved pushing by a strong force from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and that caused the collisions debris (and ejects) to move with Mars in the same motion –
- Venus has no Moon –because the debris had to move with Mars in the same motion, But because Earth Mass is greater than Venus & Mars and because the debris lost their high motion momentum, Earth could controlled some of these debris and created its moon by them – the rest debris still moved with Mars
- Mars could attract its 2 small moons from these debris
How to prove this story? By 3 following questions:
(1st question) Was Mars Original Orbital Distance = 84 mkm really? how to prove?
(2nd question) Is Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) an unique motion?
(3rd question) What are the results which prove this motion occurrence?
These questions will be discussed– but let's summarize the (3rd question) Answer:
Mars Immigration Results:
1- Mars Diameter Decreasing
2- The Asteroid Belt Creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Saturn Data proves that, Saturn is created after Mars Immigration
Saturn Data Analysis provides us the following conclusions:
-The Planets were found before Mars Immigration:
Mercury – Pluto – Mars – Earth – Jupiter- Uranus – Neptune
(7 planets)
-The Planets were found after Mars Immigration:
Venus – Saturn – The Earth Moon - (and the sun)
Please Note:
I claimed Mars immigrated from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
Please review "Mars Immigration Proves (Revised)"
http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0268
Paper Question
-How The Earth Moon Is Created?
-The Giant –Impact Hypothesis provides a good description about How the Earth Moon was Created…
-I have suggested Mars Migration Theory which can solve many difficulties faces The Giant- Impact Theory and provides a very good answer for the question how the Moon was created?
-Mars Migration Theory is reviewed in this paper introduction
Now
-Mars Migration Theory tells that – the Earth Moon was created by Mars Collisions With Venus & Earth and from these Collisions debris the Earth Moon was created in addition to Mars moons and the Asteroid belt
But
-If the Earth Moon is created from the collisions debris – why the moon diameter is created based on geometrical rules?! How to do that?
Let's consider this question in more details… for example
-The earth Moon diameter x the sun diameter = Jupiter orbital circumference – Why? this data is one of similar hundreds – for example – the moon diameter x the moon orbital motion distance (from perigee to apogee 43000 km) = Earth orbital distance…!
I want to say… that
-The Earth Moon Diameter was not created by any random process - Some Geometrical Power is found behind and forced the moon to have this (Specific Diameter & Circumference) which will be in harmony with all planets data as we have seen…!
-What's this Geometrical Power? Is it the gravity force? can the gravity produce a complex geometrical effect? What Mass the Earth should have to produce its moon with another diameter? Based on what equation?
Let's to consider this question as deep as possible in this paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (II)Gerges francis
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm from the sun and Mars had a force pushed it to change its original orbital distance to it’s a new one 227.9 mkm.
-Means Mars had moved from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) from the sun
-Mars during its motion from the point (84 mkm) to (227.9mkm)– Mars had collided with Venus (at First) and then collided with Earth (at second)
-These collisions caused some debris – and Mars had moved to complete its journey to its new orbital distance at point 227.9 mkm from the sun under the same force which caused its motion.
-Because of Mars Motion Direction, the debris can't stay around Venus and that explains why Venus has no moon – but because Earth has a greater Mass than Mars and because the debris lost their high momentum of motion – Earth could attracted some of these debris and created the Earth Moon
-This story is proved by Mars Motion Direction where this motion direction is the same direction of the solar system basic energy Motion which we have analyzed under the title "Jupiter Energy"
-Now because Mars Motion and Jupiter Energy Motion, Both are in the same direction – for that reason both are truth
-So the motion direction is from the point (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) to the sun- and that shows the direction of Motion.
-Now the collisions debris moved with Mars in the same direction and Earth could use some debris to created its moon but the rest of debris are attracted by Jupiter itself by which Jupiter created some of Jupiter rings or Asteroid belt
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The sun gravity concept is unreal (proves)Gerges francis
The Hypothesis
"There's No Gravity Found By The Sun"
This paper provides 5 proves for this hypothesis which are:
1- Planet Orbital Distance disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
2- The Sun Gravity Value disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
3- The Planet Velocity disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
4- The moon orbit analysis proves the solar group current description is incorrect.
5- The Solar Group is One Machine consists of all solar planets.
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion.
Paper Argument
- Light motion can be similar to water motion and a planet motion is similar to waterwheel motion. the planet motion is done in a cycle but light motion is continuous one (as water never return back to the water wheel).
- Uranus motion data shows light motion effects on Mercury motion, by that, Mercury moves through its orbit (a cyclic motion) but light motion which causes planet motion does a continuous motion.
- By light motion effect, Mercury orbital period (88 days) is seen in the Earth moon motion as a distance (88000 km), and because the moon needs double value of its daily displacement (88000 km x 2! WHY?) Mercury makes its day period = 176 days =2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Shortly
- Uranus Effect on Mercury & the moon motions causes their motions to be done in one cooperative motion.
- Because of that, Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 degrees effects on Mercury Day Period.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter uranus distance (metonic cycle reason)Gerges francis
Metonic Cycle is Energy sent from Uranus to the moon
Pluto also effects on Metonic Cycle and that explains his data convenience with Earth and Moon Data
Mass Is Distributed Through Solar System
Paper Hypothesis
1- Planet Mass Is Not A Planet Property But Distributed Based On Solar System Geometrical Rules
2- Mass Distribution Proves That Solar Group Is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building- And The Energy Is Transported Through The Solar Group To Create The Planet Matter And Orbital Distance.
3- Saturn Is Solar System Central Point (i.e. Saturn Is Solar System Motor)
4- Mass Distribution aims To create Different Rates Of Time Between The Solar Planets Motions.
Abstract
Uranus and Neptune are perpendicular on Saturn level
i.e. Saturn Orbital Distance locates at horizontal level with all planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) – let's call it (Saturn level)
Uranus and Neptune are on vertical level related to Saturn level - let's call it ( Uranus level)
So Uranus level is perpendicular on Saturn level
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part IV)Gerges francis
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods= 3 Mercury Rotation Periods?
We still discuss this question whose discussion is started in the previous paper
"Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 Saturn Orbital Distances"
Also we try to know If the previous relationship has any effect of Mercury Data
We complete the same discussion (in previous parts of the same series
Paper Hypothesis
There's An Interaction Between Mercury And Jupiter Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
Mercury Motion is interacted with Jupiter Motion
That Means
Mercury Motion would be changed if Jupiter Motion changed even if no other change is occurred in the solar system.
Jupiter Motion also would be changed with any change in Mercury motion.
The interaction between Jupiter and Mercury Motions can't be explained based on the masses gravity forces
Mercury & Jupiter Motions Interaction proves that the planet motion is done depending on light motion
Where
The light motion is the distance creator and energy provider but the planet moves to follow the light motion
The Planet Motion Basic Rule "The Plant Passes The Same Distance Which Is Passed By Light Motion But With A Different Rate Of Time"
Mercury & Jupiter Motions Interaction proves this fact and shows the geometrical structure of the solar planets motions mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury Motion During Its Day = Mercury Jupiter Distance. (Why?)Gerges francis
Abstract
-Mercury moves during its day period (175.94 solar days) a distance (720.7 mkm)= = Mercury Jupiter Distance
-Venus moves during its orbital period (224.7 solar days) a distance (670 mkm) = = Venus Jupiter Distance (error 1.5%)
-Earth moves during its orbital period (365.25 solar days) a distance = Earth Jupiter Distance (when Earth & Jupiter be at different sides from the sun 778.6 mkm +149.6 mkm = 929 mkm) (error 1%)
Why do The 3 Planets Move During Their Orbital Periods (Or Day Period) Distances = Their Distances To The Jupiter?!
My Answer Which I Try To Prove In This Paper.
-There's A Light Beam Its Velocity =1.16 Mkm/Sec
-This light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) creates the orbital and internal distances between all solar planets and Specially between (Jupiter, Mercury, Venus & Earth)
-The inner 3 planets (Mercury – Venus – Earth) are followers to Jupiter and they consist together one unified motion – that means- they are 3 carriages in one train and they move complementary motions to each other
-Jupiter is the guide and head of the 3 inner planets (Mercury, Venus & Earth) – Jupiter works as a reference for them (Specifically, Jupiter is the source of energy for these 3 inner planets).
Jupiter & The 3 Planets Data Prove, There's A Light Velocity =1.16mkm/Sec
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramidGerges francis
I claim that
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid Form
Where the sun is in the Pyramid Head
And the solar outer planets form the Pyramid Base….
This paper tries to prove this fact..
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid (revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Group Is A Pyramid
Abstract
Let's explain this idea in following:
- The sun is found on the Pyramid Apex
- Each Planet is found on different level which makes the solar group as a ladder
- The planets (Mercury - Saturn - Neptune – Pluto) form the Pyramid Base
- The players (The sun – Earth – Moon – Mars) form the pyramid Height (The Pyramid Main Column)
- The rest planets form the Pyramid walls
- The pyramid is consisted by the planets motions
i.e.
- The Pyramid Is The Solar Planets Motions Trajectory…
- The Pyramid Base and Height consist from different planets levels on the ladder…
Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.Sérgio Sacani
The return of a sample of near-surface atmosphere from Mars would facilitate answers to several first-order science questions surrounding the formation and evolution of the planet. One of the important aspects of terrestrial planet formation in general is the role that primary atmospheres played in influencing the chemistry and structure of the planets and their antecedents. Studies of the martian atmosphere can be used to investigate the role of a primary atmosphere in its history. Atmosphere samples would also inform our understanding of the near-surface chemistry of the planet, and ultimately the prospects for life. High-precision isotopic analyses of constituent gases are needed to address these questions, requiring that the analyses are made on returned samples rather than in situ.
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate PathwayAADYARAJPANDEY1
Normal Cell Metabolism:
Cellular respiration describes the series of steps that cells use to break down sugar and other chemicals to get the energy we need to function.
Energy is stored in the bonds of glucose and when glucose is broken down, much of that energy is released.
Cell utilize energy in the form of ATP.
The first step of respiration is called glycolysis. In a series of steps, glycolysis breaks glucose into two smaller molecules - a chemical called pyruvate. A small amount of ATP is formed during this process.
Most healthy cells continue the breakdown in a second process, called the Kreb's cycle. The Kreb's cycle allows cells to “burn” the pyruvates made in glycolysis to get more ATP.
The last step in the breakdown of glucose is called oxidative phosphorylation (Ox-Phos).
It takes place in specialized cell structures called mitochondria. This process produces a large amount of ATP. Importantly, cells need oxygen to complete oxidative phosphorylation.
If a cell completes only glycolysis, only 2 molecules of ATP are made per glucose. However, if the cell completes the entire respiration process (glycolysis - Kreb's - oxidative phosphorylation), about 36 molecules of ATP are created, giving it much more energy to use.
IN CANCER CELL:
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
introduction to WARBERG PHENOMENA:
WARBURG EFFECT Usually, cancer cells are highly glycolytic (glucose addiction) and take up more glucose than do normal cells from outside.
Otto Heinrich Warburg (; 8 October 1883 – 1 August 1970) In 1931 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology for his "discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme.
WARNBURG EFFECT : cancer cells under aerobic (well-oxygenated) conditions to metabolize glucose to lactate (aerobic glycolysis) is known as the Warburg effect. Warburg made the observation that tumor slices consume glucose and secrete lactate at a higher rate than normal tissues.
Slide 1: Title Slide
Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Slide 2: Introduction to Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Definition: Extrachromosomal inheritance refers to the transmission of genetic material that is not found within the nucleus.
Key Components: Involves genes located in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and plasmids.
Slide 3: Mitochondrial Inheritance
Mitochondria: Organelles responsible for energy production.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in mitochondria.
Inheritance Pattern: Maternally inherited, meaning it is passed from mothers to all their offspring.
Diseases: Examples include Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and mitochondrial myopathy.
Slide 4: Chloroplast Inheritance
Chloroplasts: Organelles responsible for photosynthesis in plants.
Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in chloroplasts.
Inheritance Pattern: Often maternally inherited in most plants, but can vary in some species.
Examples: Variegation in plants, where leaf color patterns are determined by chloroplast DNA.
Slide 5: Plasmid Inheritance
Plasmids: Small, circular DNA molecules found in bacteria and some eukaryotes.
Features: Can carry antibiotic resistance genes and can be transferred between cells through processes like conjugation.
Significance: Important in biotechnology for gene cloning and genetic engineering.
Slide 6: Mechanisms of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Non-Mendelian Patterns: Do not follow Mendel’s laws of inheritance.
Cytoplasmic Segregation: During cell division, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are randomly distributed to daughter cells.
Heteroplasmy: Presence of more than one type of organellar genome within a cell, leading to variation in expression.
Slide 7: Examples of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Four O’clock Plant (Mirabilis jalapa): Shows variegated leaves due to different cpDNA in leaf cells.
Petite Mutants in Yeast: Result from mutations in mitochondrial DNA affecting respiration.
Slide 8: Importance of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Evolution: Provides insight into the evolution of eukaryotic cells.
Medicine: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance helps in diagnosing and treating mitochondrial diseases.
Agriculture: Chloroplast inheritance can be used in plant breeding and genetic modification.
Slide 9: Recent Research and Advances
Gene Editing: Techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 are being used to edit mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.
Therapies: Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) for preventing mitochondrial diseases.
Slide 10: Conclusion
Summary: Extrachromosomal inheritance involves the transmission of genetic material outside the nucleus and plays a crucial role in genetics, medicine, and biotechnology.
Future Directions: Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for new treatments and applications.
Slide 11: Questions and Discussion
Invite Audience: Open the floor for any questions or further discussion on the topic.
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Mars Immigration proves
Mercury Velocity
By Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd
course student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013
TEL +201022532292 georgytawdrous@yandex.ru / mrwaheid@gmail.com
S. Virgin Mary Assumption into Heaven- Written in Cairo – Egypt -14th
July 2018
Abstract
I claim that Mars immigrated from his original Point at orbital distance =84 mkm to dwell in
his point at orbital distance 227.9 mkm..
And this immigration causes the following results:
1- A disturbance for the planet diameter and orbital distance relationship (which is proven
clearly from the solar planets order)
2- Pluto Immigration, because Pluto had to move to the Solar group End where he before
belonged to the inner planets.
This study tries to prove these facts
Also I provide in this Study my suggested description for the solar group.
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
Introduction
The solar planets order tells us clearly that there's a relationship between the planet diameter
and his orbital distance… this conclusion we get easily from the following planets order:
Mercury – Venus – Earth..
The previous planets order tells us a clear rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A
Greater Orbital Distance"
Something was happened with Mars
After Mars this rule is reversed as we see in the following planets:
Jupiter – Saturn - Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The rule became "Planet Greater Diameter has A Shorter Orbital Distance"
(Please Note/ Uranus greater in diameter and less in Mass from Neptune that tells us the
planets order depends on their diameters and NOT on their Masses)
What happened with Mars?
Mars immigration from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
Let's return Mars to his original point at orbital distance = 84 mkm
What the solar planets order will be:
Mercury – Mars - Venus – Earth..
This follows completely the rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital
Distance"
Based on this description there are 2 planets at least immigrated from their original points:
1- Mars immigrated from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
2- Pluto who belonged before to the solar inner planets (my hypothesis) and had to
move to the End of the solar group because the rule became reversed…
This paper tries to prove these facts
To do that we have to prove the following:
1- Mars moved from his original point (Mars is exceptional Planet)
2- Pluto belonged before to the solar inner planets..
This paper contains 2 points
3- Mars Original orbital distance was 84 mkm
4- An Alternative Solar Group Description
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
3- Mars Original Orbital Distance was 84 mkm
3-1 Planets Order Details
3-2 Mars is exceptional Planet
3-3 Pluto belonged before to the inner planets
3-4 The relationship between Venus, Saturn and Pluto Diameters
3-1 Planets Order Details
The planets order is explained clearly in the introduction
Let's put Mars in his supposed point 84 mkm
- Mars (84mkm) – Mercury (57.9mkm) = 26.1 mkm
- Venus (108.2mkm) - Mars (84mkm) = 26.1 mkm
This is normal because the point 84mkm is found in the middle between Mercury and
Venus
But if we add this value 26.1 mkm to Venus orbital distance 108.2 mkm
108.2 +26.1 = 135 mkm
The point 135 mkm is a point is space between Venus and Earth but I can't explain it here
Please review my old paper
Time And Distance Definitions In The Solar System
http://vixra.org/abs/1509.0241
in which I explained that this value 135 mkm is a real value which is proved by many ways.
That tells us that, the value 26.1 mkm was the solar group building unit
3-2 Mars is exceptional Planet
(Mars moves 144 mkm to his new orbital distance (for 2 reasons)
I-Data
1- 25920 mkm = 144 x 180
2- 4495 mkm (Neptune Orbital distance) = 144 mkm x Π3
3- 144 = 180 x 0.8 (Uranus Orbital inclination)
4- 144mkm x Π = 2 x 227.9 mkm (Mars new Orbital distance)
5- 144 x 2.5 Saturn orbital inclination = 360 degrees
6- 144 million km = 0.406 mkm/ day x 354.36 days (synodic year)
7- 144 degree = 5.1 moon orbital inclination x 28.3 Neptune axial Tilt
8- 144 million km = 28.3 x 3.66 x 1.392 mkm (the sun diameter)
9- Mars diameter x1092 = 81mkm
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
II-Discussion
Equation No. 1
- Equation No. 1 tells that the distance 144 mkm is in the solar group basic geometrical
stricture where 25920mkm is the most important distance, I refereed to it many times
before (distance passed by light during a solar day 86400 second x 0.3 mkm = 25920
mkm)
- Also the equation tells us this relationship depends on 180 degrees which is found by
cooperation between Saturn and Venus (will be discussed later)
Equation No. 2
- Equation No. 2 tells us that, Neptune Orbital Distance which is the source of Energy
for the inner planets as we have discussed before (Solar Group Geometrical
Structure http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081) defines the distance 144mkm based on the
factor Π3
which expresses Uranus-Jupiter relationship.
Equation No.3
- The Equation tells us that 144 mkm is found based on Uranus and the value 180
degrees
Equation No. 4
- This is a direct relationship between 2 distances the old and new
Equation No. 5
- the equation tells about specific relationship between Mars and Saturn.. and that's
known where Mars orbital Circumference = Saturn orbital distance… I still don't
know way but the relationship is strong and clear ..
Equation No.6
- the equation tells us that during a synodic year (354.36 days) Pluto moves a distance
= 144 mkm… that means there's some relationship between Pluto and Mars
displacement..
- More interesting that (1/pluto velocity) = the moon velocity! This data add more
features for the solar geometrical structure which we need more research to
understand
- Note please (1/Neptune velocity) = Mars velocity (error 3%)… this feature has
important effect on the solar system geometry but we need more search to understand
Equation No.7
- The equation tells us Mars moves 144 million km to cause Moon orbital inclination
to be 5.1 degrees.
- Specially because the other player in the equation is 28.3 Neptune axial tilt which is
the source of Energy for the solar inner planets.
Equation No.9 (important equation)
Mars Diameter x 1092
= 81 mkm
- 81 mkm is very near to Mars supposed original point 84 mkm, but very far from his
current point 227.9 mkm
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
3-2-1 Relativistic Effects on Mars distances
I-Data
1- 144 mkm x 71 = 10224 mkm = 2Π x 1622 mkm (Uranus Neptune Distance)
2- 84 mkm x 71 = 2 x 2997 (Uranus Pluto Distance)
II-Discussion
Equation No.1
The equation tells us that the distance 10224 mkm is contracted by velocity 0.9999c (by
which the sun is created) and the contracted distance is the 144 mkm (moves by Mars from
his original point 84 mkm to the new one 227.9 mkm)
Equation No.2
This equation tells a similar meaning with distance 84 mkm
i.e.
(Uranus Pluto distance x 2 ) is contracted by the rate 71 and produced the distance 84mkm
Where the distance 84mkm was Mars original orbital distance
That means the sun creation process took into consideration all these points before the sun
creation…
Means
The sun creation requirements include to make the distance 84mkm is contracted for the
Uranus Pluto distance….
3-3 Pluto belonged before to the inner planets
I- Data
1- Pluto orbital inclination = 17.2 degrees (solar inner planets orbital inclination total
=17.4 degrees) the rate 17.2/17.4 = 0.99 (which we know perfectly)
2- (1/Pluto velocity)= the Moon orbit circumference (moon motion per 27.3 days)
3- 5642 Mars Pluto distance = 227.9 Mars current orbital distance x 24.7 Mars day
II- Discussion
The previous data supports the claim that Pluto belonged before to the solar inner planets
and had to move to his current point at the end of the solar group
3-4 The relationship between Venus, Saturn and Pluto Diameters
I –Data
1- (Venus diameter / Pluto diameter) = (Venus orbital inclination/ Pluto orbital inclination)
= 5.1
2- Venus diameter x 1092
= 144 mkm=
3- Pluto diameter x Saturn radius = 144 mkm
4- But we know that Saturn diameter = Venus diameter x π2
II- Discussion
The previous data shows strong relationship between Venus, Saturn and Pluto, where the
relationship between Venus and Pluto shows that Pluto belonged before to the inner planets.
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
Let's review some ideas here
Venus effect on the solar planets diameters
Table No.Venus Diameter * Planet Diameter= Planet Orbital Distance
Error
Venus Diameter x Mercury diameter = Mercury orbital distance 1.9%
Venus Diameter x moon diameter =Venus / Earth distance 1.4%
Venus Diameter x Earth diameter = Earth orbital distance 3.1%
Venus Diameter x Mars diameter =Mars Earth distance 4.7%
Venus Diameter x Saturn diameter =Saturn orbital distance 1.7%
Mercury diameter x Jupiter diameter =Mercury / Jupiter distance -
(Uranus diameter)2 =Mars / Uranus distance 1.1%
Saturn radius x Neptune diameter = Saturn Neptune distance 1.7%
Venus Circumference x Neptune Circumference = Pluto orbital distance 1.7%
Venus Circumference x Π = Saturn diameter
"-" means the error less than 1%
Most Planets Follow The Same Rule …please Note, Pluto once again
has exceptional situation… that tells the reason is the same where
many exceptional situations are done for the same planet..
- Discussion
The previous data tells us that the planets orbital distances are defined based on the planet
diameter with Venus diameter… how can we understand that?
Mars immigration caused many changes in planets orbital distances not only with Mars but
with Pluto also at least…
Now let's suppose that the planet diameter and orbital distance relationship is one of the
important relationships for the planet motion
So this disturbance in the relationship needs to repair to enable the planet to move… ! How
to solve this problem?
Venus diameter is created with Mars immigration and works as a central gear to perform the
solar group balance ….So the rate 1092
in fact is born from Venus diameter
Actually 144 mkm = (109.5)4
Let's summarize the conclusion in following:
1- Venus is the central gear for the solar group
2- Mars Immigration effects on all solar planets
The last point has specific importance which tells us that Mars effects on all solar planets
and this information we know from very long time let's provide one proof for that in
following (please review Solar Planet Diameter Creation Rule)
http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0190
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
4- An Alternative Solar Group Description
In this point I discuss why the Solar Group Current Description is insufficient! and provide
my alternative one
Let's perform this task in next 2 points.
1st
/ Why The Current Description is Insufficient?
2nd
/ The Alternative Description
1s
/ Why The Current Description is Insufficient?
The current theories tell us that, the solar planet moves by gravity forces between his and
the sun masses, where the planet defines his orbital distance according to this gravity
forces… So the solar group current description shows the solar planets as separated points
meet each other only through the sun.
Also the main effective relationship is the sun-planet relationship where the planet-planet
relationship is very weak because of the sun massive Mass..
The solar planets, according to the current description, are created from a star was following
the sun, later exploded and from his material the solar planets are created by gravity
(means the solar planets matters are created by random and there is no any relationship
between the planets diameters)
The Current Description Problems
1- No one knows How the matter is created? the star story gives us nothing about the
matter, simply we don't know how the matter is created? or why the mass produces
the gravity?
2- The gravity which is the main force in this description still puzzle till now! No one
knows the gravity mechanism or if it needs time to work!
3- The main problem in this description is the Planet Data Inconsistency, where the
description tells us that Mercury Orbital Distance =57.9 mkm because of the gravity
between his and the sun masses. But the description tells us no explanation why
Mercury Diameter = 4879 km or why his orbital inclination = 7 degrees…we can see
easily that the description uses some of the planet data and ignores simply the other
data and by such way the solar planet data become inconsistent…
4- This problem produces worse result. Where there's no explanation for the planet
ignored data, each relationship is found with this data will be just pure coincidence!
The main question still needs answer… How the matter is created?
Again let's provide our old puzzle one more time here …
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? Because (the Sun diameter /the moon
diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance/ Earth Moon Distance)? Why The Diameters Rate
=The Distances Rate? no answer for this question because no one knows How the matter is
created?
The matter creation was and will be our main difficulty to see the truth. The matter is the
player in every point around us, she does the motion and tells us there's a physical law
behind.. the Matter is The Knowledge Messenger…
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
2nd
/ The Alternative Description
My suggested Description provides the answer for the main question "How the Matter is
created …let's write that at immediately here…
What's the Matter (Mass)? The Mass is an Energy (E=mc2
)
What's the distance? The Distance is an Energy (hypothesis)
i.e.
From The Same Energy The Matters (Masses) And Distances Are Created
The Description Summary
One unified Energy is transported from one point to another point through the solar group,
this same energy creates the planets matters (masses) and causes the motion transportation
from planet to another through the group. In this transportation of Energy the relativistic
effects are found because the energy has different velocities in her motions through the
group
Based on these relativistic effects, different rates of times are created and based on these
different rates of time the solar group can accumulate the energy in different points to create
a huge energy from the low one.
Let's summarize the description main points in following:
1- General Description
2- Main Relationship
3- Motion Transportation
4- Relativistic And Non-Relativistic motions
5- Distance And Time Values Equivalence
6- How the Distance And Time Values can be equivalent?
7- Energy Accumulation Concept (Why time and distance values are equivalent)
Let's provide a brief statement about each point in following:
1- General Description
- One Unified Energy travels from one point to another point through the solar group,
in her travel this unified Energy creates the planet matter and the distance from
planet to another planet.
- for Example, the Energy comes from the sun toward Mercury, so she builds firstly
Mercury orbital distance and then will build Mercury Planet Mass. Then this same
Energy will move toward Venus to build the distance between Mercury and Venus
and then will build Venus Planet Mass….etc (Note/ this example is for explanation
only, because the Energy real trajectory is more complex)
- This description makes the planet-planet relationship is strong as much as the sun-
planet relationship.
- Let's summarize the idea in a sentence "One Unified Energy builds the Distance
and Mass of all solar planets"
- This description makes the solar group similar to one line of Energy (a necklace)
- Also this description makes the solar group similar to a great river has many canals,
each canal creates a soil on her banks. The river water here is similar to the Energy,
she creates everything and have different forms, so the canals and their soils are
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
created from the river water … that's the same description the matter and distance are
created from the same energy even if the matter is not similar to the distance but both
of them are created from the same source…
2- Main Relationship
- The problem becomes clear now, because the Energy is transported in different forms
as mass, distance or time values.. how can we see the main geometrical pillars of the
solar group where there thousands of relationships are found? What relationship is
the main one?
- The main relationship is the relationship which connects many planets. For Example
Mars Axial Tilt 25.2 degrees works as the constant in Kepler 3rd
law (table No.1 is
found at End of this introduction).. from this table we see that the constant 25 = Mars
Axial Tilt, this tells us that, this Value 25 effects on all solar planets.. even if we
don't know why or how but this value (25.2 Mars Axial Tilt) is one of the main solar
geometrical structure Values.
- The Description Main advantage is the integration and cooperation between the
solar planets… which makes the solar group as one machine, that means the value
25.2 will be Mars axial tilt in any place we find it. In more clear The sun Diameter =
Venus Diameter x 115.2 (this value 115.2 is Mars Axial Tilt uses its vertical value
i.e. 115.2 = 25.2 +90) …means the sun diameter is defined based on Venus diameter
with help from Mars Axial tilt.
3- Motion Transportation
- Similar to the transported motion from one gear to another, the motion is transported
from one planet to another and through the motion transportation the energy is
transported also from point to another through the solar group…
- We should pay attention to the motion transportation sequence ….. Because it's not
necessary to transport the motion by the current solar planets sequence …. There are
2 reasons for that
- 1st
Reason – The planets positions from the sun may change through the history – as
I suggested before that Mars immigrated from his original point at 84 mkm to the sun
to dwell in his new point in 227.9 mkm to the sun…. this change of Mars orbital
distance– if real- causes a disturbance for Motion transportation sequence… the Sun
Please review: Data shows Relativistic Effects (revised) http://vixra.org/abs/1806.0209
- 2nd
- Reason – the planets positions relative to each other… where I claimed that
some planets suffer from Relativistic effects but other don't… that may cause more
disturbance for the motion transportation sequence….
- Can we discover the motion transportation real sequence? Yes … because the Energy
is transported from point to another through the solar group and we can follow this
Energy trajectory to see clearly the motion transportation sequence.
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
4- Relativistic and Non-Relativistic Motions
The Description Main Hypothesis
- "There's a physical point in the solar group moves with light velocity relative to
another physical point in the solar group"
- This high velocity motion causes relativistic effects on the planets orbital distances
and periods
- Because the solar group is one machine or one integrated system, these relativistic
effects can be observed in different points in the solar group…
- We can't observe this high velocity motion but we can observe and record the
relativistic effects
- So my work is to rewrite the solar planets data in a form shows the relativistic
effects, where the planets data consistency will be a crucial proof for my claim.
- If we can perform this task and prove that there are relativistic effects in the solar
group, that will make the solar group another source to study the Special Theory of
relativity by which we can test and develop the theory basics and concepts.
- The proves and discussion of this claim are written in Point No.5 of this Paper
5- Distance And Time Values Equivalence
The Special Theory of Relativity tells us that
If a particle (energy) moves with c velocity the following relativistic effects may be observed:
1st- Time Dilation
2nd- Length Contraction
3rd- Mass Increasing
4th- Time And Distance Values become equivalent…
Point No. 4th
is my conclusion I got by the solar planets data analysis, and this is my
suggested contribution in the Special Theory of Relativity
Let's Provide an example to explain how I reach to this conclusion…
- 25920 years is the Cycle of Precession.
But
- Light moves during the solar day 86400 seconds a distance = 25920 million km
Also
- Solar Planets velocities total 17.6 mkm/ daily x 1461 days (Earth 4-years Cycle_ =
25920 mkm
As we see in the previous relationships… the value 25920 are seen 2 times one in time units
and the other in distance units…. The same value are seen in different units…
Because this situation is repeated hundreds of times I found it's necessary to find a logical
explanation for that..
So I suggested that, the Distance and Time Values become equivalent with high velocity as
relativistic effect … I concluded that basically because not all distance and time values can
be equivalent but only a great part of them which can't be pure coincidences … so I
searched for specific reason behind and suggested this one..
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
- Let's see another example for more explanation
o Jupiter Orbital Period 4331 days = Mars Orbital Period 687 days x2Π … this
equation tells us that these orbital periods are energy transported from one
point to another, as the motion transportation from one gear to another…. The
time values here are equivalent to distance values, (as the factor 2Π tells us)
but these values become time values because of the relativistic effects in the
solar group….now we can see that, this equation has a physical reason behind
and not pure coincidence…
(Review Table No.2 for equivalent time and distance values at end of this introduction)
I want to explain that, the time and distance values equivalence is one of the main Pillars in
the solar system geometrical structure, so this isn't limited case in the solar group rather an
extending case …
- Let's see one more example for more explanation
2 x 86400 mkm = 60 x 2872.5 mkm (Uranus Orbital Distance)
The previous Equation has very specific importance in the solar group
Let's remember its components
- The value 2 x 86400 mkm is the solar group main energy, this value we have
discussed in details with Jupiter Energy in my previous paper "Solar Group
Geometrical Structure" http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
- 2872.5 mkm Uranus orbital Distance is very important distance in the solar group
because Uranus is the main player in the sun creation process, we have discussed that
before in "The Time definition" http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0523
- The value 60: is a famous rate in the solar group, and it's found basically because
1hour = 60 minutes and 1 minute = 60 seconds…. Means this rate is found between
the distances because these same distances are worked as units of time in different
cases that's why this rate 60 is required….(please review Table No.3 in End of this
introduction for a complete list for the rate 60)
6- How the Distance And Time Values can be equivalent?
The Distance And Time Values are equivalent! What does that mean?
What distance is equivalent to what time?
I'll write here the general conclusion of this argument but the discussion and arguments are
found in Point No.6 of this paper
The General Conclusion
- The solar system uses a unified distance, say 1 million km, for different times rates!
i.e.
- There's a cycle in which 1 mkm = 1 second
- There's another cycle in which 1 mkm = 1 minute
- There's another cycle in which 1 mkm = 1 hour
- There's another cycle in which 1 mkm = 1 day
- There's another cycle in which 1 mkm = 1 week
- There's another cycle in which 1 mkm = 1 month
- There's another cycle in which 1 mkm = 1 year
- There's another cycle in which 1 mkm = 1 Earth Cycle (1461 days)
- That means the same distance works for many Cycle periods… why?
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
The solar group geometry uses the unified distances to create different rates of time
What does that mean?
The distance also has different rates! Yes the time has day, minute and seconds…etc
But the distance has km and thousand km and million km and …..etc
So, how to understand this conclusion?
Yes the distance has different rates but no cycle makes this rate to be known
The time different rates have cycles in the solar group to make these rates are shown
That's why the humanity knew all time rates…. year, month, week, day, minute, seconds
These values are standard for the universe regardless the people knowledge
But for distance, people uses km, miles, cubes ….etc
Solar Group Geometrical Design
The previous conclusion is interesting, the time periods are clear for people but distances
aren't that because the universe geometry explains the time different values and rates..
Interesting idea….
But what's the useful result form it?
Why the time different rates and values are seen but the distances aren't?
Because the distances are unified but the time values are specific and shown by cycles
So, the 1 million km which we used in previous data is the same
But with different rates of time..!
Now let's ask
why the solar geometry does that?! Because
The Energy accumulation process depends on different rates of time
7- Energy Accumulation Concept (Why time and distance values are equivalent)
By the different rates of time Earth motion can produce the Sun Energy i.e.
What the Earth moved along complete year, the sun can uses for one day only
so we can see how the energy is accumulated
let's summarize all that in clear idea
-The main Idea Summary
- Based on the solar group relativistic motions, time values can be seen as distances values
- The solar geometry uses unified distances to create different values of time, which
are seen by different cycles
- The time different values depend on each other to create different rates of time
- By this different rates of time the Energy can be accumulated to produce huge energy
from average one.
- Based on this description, the solar planets motions produce the sun light beams
This claim proves and discussion will be in point No.7 of this paper
Please See also
Solar Group Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081