1. [From 10$/Pg] Please Give Complete Answers
[From 10$/Pg] Please Give Complete Answers Please give complete answers in complete
sentences and type out the questions. 1. What objection to utilitarian ethics does Mill mean
to answer in this chapter? What does Mill think motivates this objection?2. What does Mill
conclude that we ordinarily mean by justice, and what is its relationship to what he calls
morality?3. According to Mill, what must be the origin of the sentiment of justice, and when
is it, properly speaking, a moral sentiment?4. What is Mill’s criticism of Immanuel Kant’s
fundamental principle of morals?5. According to Mill, what do we mean when we say that
someone has a right? Why do we attribute rights to people, and what morally justifies the
protection of rights?6. Why, according to Mill, can’t any principle of justice serve as final
arbiter of moral disputes? What argument does he offer in support of this claim?7. If
general utility is all that ultimately matters to Mill, then why does he believe that the
prescriptions of justice outweigh the prescriptions of policy (i.e., prudence or efficiency in
the management of affairs)?8. What does Mill say is “the highest abstract standard of social
and distributive justice,” and what more basic principle is it founded on?9. How does Mill
respond to the objection that the principle of utility presupposes a more basic principle of
justice (viz., the equal rights of persons)?10. What does Mill say is the proper relationship
between the equal rights of persons and general (social) utility?
![[From 10$/Pg] Please Give Complete Answers
[From 10$/Pg] Please Give Complete Answers Please give complete answers in complete
sentences and type out the questions. 1. What objection to utilitarian ethics does Mill mean
to answer in this chapter? What does Mill think motivates this objection?2. What does Mill
conclude that we ordinarily mean by justice, and what is its relationship to what he calls
morality?3. According to Mill, what must be the origin of the sentiment of justice, and when
is it, properly speaking, a moral sentiment?4. What is Mill’s criticism of Immanuel Kant’s
fundamental principle of morals?5. According to Mill, what do we mean when we say that
someone has a right? Why do we attribute rights to people, and what morally justifies the
protection of rights?6. Why, according to Mill, can’t any principle of justice serve as final
arbiter of moral disputes? What argument does he offer in support of this claim?7. If
general utility is all that ultimately matters to Mill, then why does he believe that the
prescriptions of justice outweigh the prescriptions of policy (i.e., prudence or efficiency in
the management of affairs)?8. What does Mill say is “the highest abstract standard of social
and distributive justice,” and what more basic principle is it founded on?9. How does Mill
respond to the objection that the principle of utility presupposes a more basic principle of
justice (viz., the equal rights of persons)?10. What does Mill say is the proper relationship
between the equal rights of persons and general (social) utility?](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/pleasegivecompleteanswers-230529143247-589fdbff/85/Please-Give-Complete-Answers-docx-1-320.jpg)
