Chapter One Theory of Health Care Ethics 1 2 Why Study Ethics? Because health care is changing, you need tools for making necessary and difficult decisions. It will help you better understand patients, fellow professionals, and the system in general. It will assist you in building and maintaining your career. 3 3 Types of Ethics Normative ethics Is the study of what is right and wrong. Metaethics Is the study of ethical concepts and theories. 4 4 Types of Normative Ethical Theories Authority-based Egoistic Natural law Deontological Teleological Virtue 5 5 Ethical Relativism Ethical relativism purports that there is no absolute theory for ethics. However, this lack of a complete theory does not mean everything is relative. People need to make rational decisions about ethics-based issues. Therefore, ethics theories are useful. 6 6 Egoism as Ethics Theory Egoism is based on the idea that one’s self interest is the basis of one’s ethics decisions. Theory is not helpful in health care ethics because professionals are taught to set aside self-interest. The interests of the patient should come first. 7 7 Authority-based Ethics Theory Decisions about ethics (right or wrong) are based on central authority such as in a theology or an ideology. For health care ethics, there may be difficulty deciding which authority is the correct one. However, knowing this view of ethics helps with understanding patients and health policy decisions. 8 8 Virtue Ethics Theory Is founded in the writings of Aristotle. Everything moves from potentiality to actuality. Character development allows you to actualize your highest good. Eudaimonia should be sought as the highest good. 9 9 Virtue Ethics Theory Eudaimonia means that you seek to build your character and increase virtue. Professional education seeks to develop people of high character. People who work toward eudaimonia become persons of practical wisdom. 10 10 Virtue Ethics Theory Principles of ethics can help to define your character and assist with your actions. See Chapter Two for more. Virtue ethics is criticized as being elitist. Virtue ethics requires the balancing of conflicting obligations. People with practical wisdom can make appropriate ethical decisions. 11 11 Natural Law Theory It is founded in the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas It assumes that nature is rational and orderly. Humans are part of the natural world and are given the ability to be rational. Our natural reason allows us to distinguish right from wrong. 12 12 Natural Law Theory Reason is also action in that humans can choose to do good or evil. The Principle of Double Effect helps us decided which action is good. Good is also defined as that which helps to maximize potential such as preserving life, gaining wisdom, and knowing God. 13 13 Natural Law Theory In natural law, there are some acts that are not ethical because they violate the ability to reach one’s potent ...

1. Chapter One
Theory of Health Care Ethics
1
2
Why Study Ethics?
Because health care is changing, you need tools for making
necessary and difficult decisions.
It will help you better understand patients, fellow professionals,
and the system in general.
It will assist you in building and maintaining your career.
3
3
Types of Ethics
Normative ethics
Is the study of what is right and wrong.
Metaethics
Is the study of ethical concepts and theories.
4
4

2. Types of Normative Ethical Theories
Authority-based
Egoistic
Natural law
Deontological
Teleological
Virtue
5
5
Ethical Relativism
Ethical relativism purports that there is no absolute theory for
ethics.
However, this lack of a complete theory does not mean
everything is relative.
People need to make rational decisions about ethics-based
issues.
Therefore, ethics theories are useful.
6
6
Egoism as Ethics Theory
Egoism is based on the idea that one’s self interest is the basis
of one’s ethics decisions.
Theory is not helpful in health care ethics because professionals
are taught to set aside self-interest.
The interests of the patient should come first.
7

3. 7
Authority-based Ethics Theory
Decisions about ethics (right or wrong) are based on central
authority such as in a theology or an ideology.
For health care ethics, there may be difficulty deciding which
authority is the correct one.
However, knowing this view of ethics helps with understanding
patients and health policy decisions.
8
8
Virtue Ethics Theory
Is founded in the writings of Aristotle.
Everything moves from potentiality to actuality.
Character development allows you to actualize your highest
good.
Eudaimonia should be sought as the highest good.
9
9
Virtue Ethics Theory
Eudaimonia means that you seek to build your character and
increase virtue.
Professional education seeks to develop people of high
character.

4. People who work toward eudaimonia become persons of
practical wisdom.
10
10
Virtue Ethics Theory
Principles of ethics can help to define your character and assist
with your actions. See Chapter Two for more.
Virtue ethics is criticized as being elitist.
Virtue ethics requires the balancing of conflicting obligations.
People with practical wisdom can make appropriate ethical
decisions.
11
11
Natural Law Theory
It is founded in the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas
It assumes that nature is rational and orderly.
Humans are part of the natural world and are given the ability to
be rational.
Our natural reason allows us to distinguish right from wrong.
12
12
Natural Law Theory

5. Reason is also action in that humans can choose to do good or
evil.
The Principle of Double Effect helps us decided which action is
good.
Good is also defined as that which helps to maximize potential
such as preserving life, gaining wisdom, and knowing God.
13
13
Natural Law Theory
In natural law, there are some acts that are not ethical because
they violate the ability to reach one’s potential.
People who support social responsibility can use natural law as
a foundation for deciding actions.
Understanding natural law also assists with patient relations.
14
14
Deontology Theory
Comes from the Greek word “deon” meaning “duty.”
It is sometimes called duty-based ethics.
One of the main theorists is Immanuel Kant.
15
15

6. Deontology Theory
The world exists in the form of things we can experience
directly (phenomenal world) and things that and that exists
independent of the intellect (noumenal world).
Free will makes ethics possible and without it we would not
need ethics.
16
16
Deontology Theory
Areas of character can be used for good or evil.
Therefore, the only true good is good will.
The ability to choose to do good is what makes us human.
17
17
Deontology Theory
Actions are judged by their intention and not just their
outcomes.
Kant attempted to define a rational principle for making moral
judgments.
The principle is the categorical imperative.
People can never be used as a means to an end; they must be
respected.
18
18

7. Deontology Theory
The Golden Rule is not a synonym for the categorical
imperative.
Kant believed that we must act based on duty to moral law and
not on the consequences of our actions.
Practicing this in its pure form is difficult in modern society.
19
19
Kant and Virtue Ethics
Pure Kantian ethics is absolute in its definition of duty but
virtue ethics allows for grey areas.
Kant does not assist with deciding among lesser evils and
greater goods
Virtue ethics allows the use of tools to make these decisions
20
20
Deontology and Policy
Health care professionals recognize a duty to the patient,
Health care managers also have a duty to the patient, but
They have duties to the organization and community as well.
Conflicting duties must be considered in policy making.
21
21

8. Non-Kantian Deontology
Recent proponents of the deontology tradition include John
Rawls and Robert Nozick.
These theorists deal with the idea of justice through our actions.
Their thinking influences health care reform, public health, and
other health areas.
22
John Rawls
John Rawls worked to define the characteristics of a just
society.
He examined justice as fairness and applied it to societies that
respect the rule of law.
His work is based on the idea of a social contract between
members of a society.
23
Self Interest and Justice
Rawls used a hypothetical or mind experiment called the
original position to explain why rational people would protect
everyone’s self interests.
In this mind experiment, he also included the concept of the veil
of ignorance to help us understand why we would care about
self interests.
24
Self Interest and Justice
If we were in the original position, we would all be equal.
Therefore, we could all be treated in the same way in a society.
Therefore, it would be in our self interest to make sure that
everyone is given an equal share of benefits and burdens.
25

9. Basic Principles of Justice
The first principle of justice for Rawls is liberty.
This principle is also a priority over all other principles of
justice.
People should have equal right to basic liberties (see the Bill of
Rights).
26
Basic Principles of Justice
The second principle for Rawls is justification of inequalities.
He uses the difference principle to justify when social and
economic inequities are appropriate.
Physicians are a classic example of the difference principle.
27
Rawls’ Opponent
Robert Nozick is also considered to be a deontologist.
He represents the conservative tradition and has great influence
in the debate over health care reform.
Nozick emphasizes the autonomy and the rights of the
individual.
28
Nozick and Social Goods
For Nozick, there is no social good that requires sacrifice.
We are only “other people”.
We should influence people to take steps to improve their own
situations.
Theories like Rawls supports defeat of voluntary agreements.
29

10. Nozick and Distributive Justice
For Nozick, there is no principle of distributive justice.
He finds justice in acquisition and owned resources.
Historical injustices are not addressed in his theory except to
suggest that society could be organized to maximize the
position of the least well off.
30
Consequentialism Theory
Through Mill’s work, this theory is also known as
utilitarianism.
For this theory, your intentions are irrelevant; all that counts is
the outcome.
Greatest Good for the Greatest Number is often used as a
summary of the theory.
31
31
Consequentialism Theory
Has two main types
Classical or act utilitarianism.
Each act considered on its own
Rule utilitarianism.
Develop rules that net the greatest benefit
32
32
Consequentialism Theory

11. Rule utilitarianism is used to make health care policy.
Exceptions can be made under special circumstances.
Rule utilitarianism also allows for negative consequentialism or
preventing the greatest harm for the greatest number.
33
33
Consequentialism Theory
Preference utilitarianism argues that good is honoring
preferences and bad is frustrating preferences
Preferences must be known or a substituted judgment can be
used
34
34
Consequentialism Theory
Criticisms of utilitarianism include
The minority is not protected when the greatest good for the
greatest number is the goal.
Some say this theory means that the ends justifies the means.
These criticisms are not valid because respect for autonomy and
liberty is essential to the theory.
35
35
Use of Ethical Theories

12. There is no pure ethical theory; each has strengths and
weaknesses.
However, health care professionals must make complicated
ethics decisions
The ability to understand theory enhances your decision making
tool kit.
36
36
In Summary…
37
37
Florida National University
Biomedical Ethics: Week 1
Critical Reflection Paper: Chapter 1
Objective: To critically replicate you’re thoughtful of the
readings and your competence to rub on them to your Health
care ethics.
ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES (10%):
Students will judgmentally appraise the readings from Chapter 1
on your textbook. This assignment is intended to help you
assessment, examination, and spread over the readings to your
healthcare ethics as well as become the foundation for all of
your remaining assignments.
You need to read the article (in the additional weekly reading
resources localize in the Syllabus and also in the Lectures link)

13. assigned for week 1 and develop a 2-3-page paper reflecting
your appreciative and ability to apply the readings to your
ethics. Each paper must be typewritten with 12-point font and
double-spaced with standard margins. Follow APA format 7th
Edition, when referring to the selected articles and include a
reference page.
EACH PAPER SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
1. Introduction (25%) Provide a short-lived summary of the
undertone (not a description) of each Chapter and articles you
read, in your own words.
2. Your Critique (50%)
What is your response to the content of the articles?
What did you absorb about the Types of Ethics? Mention and
explain two examples where you can apply them.
What did you obtain about the key features of the natural law?
What is Deontology Theory and its principles? Apply them your
future carrier.
Mention and describe all the principle of ethics and mention
example of them that apply to your professional life.
3. Conclusion (15%)
Fleetingly recapitulate your thoughts & postulation to your
analysis of the articles and Chapter you read. How did these
articles and Chapters impact your thoughts about the principles
of ethics?
Evaluation will be based on how clearly you respond to the
above, in particular:
a) The clarity with which you critique the articles;
b) The depth, scope, and association of your paper; and,
c) Your conclusions, including a description of the impact of
these articles and Chapters on any Health Care Setting.
ASSIGNMENT DUE DATE:
The assignment is to be electronically posted in the
Assignments Link on Blackboard no later than noon on Sunday,
March 15, 2020.
Originality: Turnitin submission required

14. ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS
Assignments Guidelines
1.0 Points
10%
Introduction
2.5 Points
25%
Your Critique
5.0 Points
50%
Conclusion
1.5 Points
15%
Total
10 points
100%
ASSIGNMENT GRADING SYSTEM
A
90% - 100%
B+
85% - 89%
B
80% - 84%
C+
75% - 79%
C
70% - 74%
D
60% – 69%

15. F
50% - 59% Or less.
Dr. Gisela LLamas