This document discusses the importance of including assessment in library projects. It advocates creating clear goals tied to strategic plans and measures of success before beginning a project. This allows projects to be adjusted or stopped if not working. Two examples are provided: a research help desk project and discovery evaluation. For each, goals and measures were set, then results like improved relations and justification for purchases were found through assessment. The document concludes by providing a project proposal template to formalize goal and measure planning.
NComapss Live - July 17, 2019
http://nlc.nebraska.gov/NCompassLive/
Join us to learn about the new Project Outcome for Academic Libraries surveys and resources. Project Outcome is a free toolkit that helps libraries measure four key learning outcomes – knowledge, confidence, application, and awareness – across seven library program and service areas.
Presenter: Sara S. Goek, Program Manager, Association of College & Research Libraries
Using the Logic Model for Impact & Success; #SLA2017Rebecca Jones
Given at the SLA Conference in Phoenix 2017, an overview of the logic model to measure the outcomes of information services & programs from the decision-makers' perspectives.
NComapss Live - July 17, 2019
http://nlc.nebraska.gov/NCompassLive/
Join us to learn about the new Project Outcome for Academic Libraries surveys and resources. Project Outcome is a free toolkit that helps libraries measure four key learning outcomes – knowledge, confidence, application, and awareness – across seven library program and service areas.
Presenter: Sara S. Goek, Program Manager, Association of College & Research Libraries
Using the Logic Model for Impact & Success; #SLA2017Rebecca Jones
Given at the SLA Conference in Phoenix 2017, an overview of the logic model to measure the outcomes of information services & programs from the decision-makers' perspectives.
UXPA 2023: UX research: Optimizing collaboration with project research sponsorsUXPA International
UX researchers can deliver more value by optimizing how they work with research sponsors at two key stages of a study: defining study questions and delivering results. When defining study questions (i.e., scoping and framing the study), researchers can improve upon initial input from sponsors by (1) enlarging the problem frame and (2) refining the questions posed to study participants. When delivering results, researchers can use two tactics: (1) preserving freedom of action and (2) adding breathing room between findings and recommendations. The recommended practices in this talk arose my idiosyncratic reflections and solutions to challenges I’ve encountered in conducting UX research with project teams. These practices have been validated in numerous engagements, and shared informally with colleagues in multiple organizations.
User Experience Service showcase lightning talks - December 2018Neil Allison
The University of Edinburgh User Experience Service ran a showcase of recent projects on 5 December 2018. The session began with these lightning talks.
This presentation includes a set of frameworks, steps, and worksheets for developing institutional student learning outcomes tied to community/civic engagement.
User Research for the Web and ApplicationsDani Nordin
Update of a talk originally given as a Skillshare workshop. Given at BioRaft Drupal Nights in summer 2013, and to be given at UX Boston in September 2013.
Evaluating community projects
These guidelines were initially developed as part of the JRF Neighbourhood Programme. This programme is made up of 20 community or voluntary organisations all wanting to exercise a more strategic influence in their neighbourhood. The guidelines were originally written to help these organisations evaluate their work. They provide step-by-step advice on how to evaluate a community project which will be of interest to a wider audience.
What is evaluation?
Put simply, evaluation by members of a project or organisation will help people to learn from their day-to-day work. It can be used by a group of people, or by individuals working alone. It assesses the effectiveness of a piece of work, a project or a programme. It can also highlight whether your project is moving steadily and successfully towards achieving what it set out to do, or whether it is moving in a different direction. You can then celebrate and build on successes as well as learn from what has not worked so well.
Why evaluate?
Although evaluation may seem like an unnecessary additional task if you are already short of time and resources, it can save you both time and resources by keeping participants focused on, and working towards, the ultimate goal of the project. If necessary, it can refocus activity away from unproductive or unnecessary work.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
UXPA 2023: UX research: Optimizing collaboration with project research sponsorsUXPA International
UX researchers can deliver more value by optimizing how they work with research sponsors at two key stages of a study: defining study questions and delivering results. When defining study questions (i.e., scoping and framing the study), researchers can improve upon initial input from sponsors by (1) enlarging the problem frame and (2) refining the questions posed to study participants. When delivering results, researchers can use two tactics: (1) preserving freedom of action and (2) adding breathing room between findings and recommendations. The recommended practices in this talk arose my idiosyncratic reflections and solutions to challenges I’ve encountered in conducting UX research with project teams. These practices have been validated in numerous engagements, and shared informally with colleagues in multiple organizations.
User Experience Service showcase lightning talks - December 2018Neil Allison
The University of Edinburgh User Experience Service ran a showcase of recent projects on 5 December 2018. The session began with these lightning talks.
This presentation includes a set of frameworks, steps, and worksheets for developing institutional student learning outcomes tied to community/civic engagement.
User Research for the Web and ApplicationsDani Nordin
Update of a talk originally given as a Skillshare workshop. Given at BioRaft Drupal Nights in summer 2013, and to be given at UX Boston in September 2013.
Evaluating community projects
These guidelines were initially developed as part of the JRF Neighbourhood Programme. This programme is made up of 20 community or voluntary organisations all wanting to exercise a more strategic influence in their neighbourhood. The guidelines were originally written to help these organisations evaluate their work. They provide step-by-step advice on how to evaluate a community project which will be of interest to a wider audience.
What is evaluation?
Put simply, evaluation by members of a project or organisation will help people to learn from their day-to-day work. It can be used by a group of people, or by individuals working alone. It assesses the effectiveness of a piece of work, a project or a programme. It can also highlight whether your project is moving steadily and successfully towards achieving what it set out to do, or whether it is moving in a different direction. You can then celebrate and build on successes as well as learn from what has not worked so well.
Why evaluate?
Although evaluation may seem like an unnecessary additional task if you are already short of time and resources, it can save you both time and resources by keeping participants focused on, and working towards, the ultimate goal of the project. If necessary, it can refocus activity away from unproductive or unnecessary work.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
2. In the old days…
• Get an idea.
• (Maybe) draft a plan.
• (Maybe) confer with a
colleague or two.
• (Maybe) talk to some other
people.
• Do it.
• Sit back and receive kudos,
watch enjoy the improved
service/collection/space.
3. • How did you know the project was appropriate for your
library?
• Did it fit larger library or institutional goals?
• Could you articulate its costs and benefits?
• Who was supposed to benefit from this project? Did they
know it was happening? Did they realize how it was supposed
to improve their library world?
How was the project deemed a success?
Or failure?
But…
4. Enter: Assessment!
• Create clear goals - tie your project to strategic plan, give your
project potential for “success”.
• Create clear measures for assessing “success”.
• Ensure key stakeholders are central to these goals and
measures.
• Mitigate negative issues created by change.
• Create a plan with “stop-and-measure” points along the way =
adjustments can be made OR kill switch can be pulled.
• Broadcast your success – communication is made easy
because you have already collected the data!
• Continue to measure the product against the stated goals OR
create new goals for the implemented project.
5. Project 1:
New Research Help Desk
• Proposed move from big reference desk to integrated
Research Help Desk at front counter.
• Stakeholders: Students, Librarians, Staff
• Two outcomes available:
• Stay integrated into main front counter
• buy a new, smaller desk
• Proposed project viewed very negatively by some Librarians
and staff.
• Carried out Mar-July 2014
• Kill point: end of spring term
6. Project 1:
New Research Help Desk
• Consultation and
discussion yielded goals:
1. Students can find and
use our services as or
more easily
2. Workspace is adequate
and comfortable
3. Workspace does not
inhibit student/Librarian
interaction
4. Neutral or positive
impact on Circulation
Services work area
• Goals yielded measures
& tools:
1. Student
satisfaction/survey;
observation
2. Librarian
satisfaction/direct
feedback
3. Student
satisfaction/survey
4. Staff satisfaction/direct
feedback
7. Project 1:
New Research Help Desk
• RESULTS (besides a new desk):
• Students: Improved visibility, same high quality
of service confirmed
• Staff: Relations with staff improved, negative
impact of change mitigated
• Librarians: feel more integrated, still working
out comfort issues
8. Project 2:
Discovery Evaluation
• Reviewing 2 webscale discovery
products for potential purchase.
• Goals:
• Improve accessibility of the collection
• Provide more intuitive search environment
• Spend our money wisely
9. Project 2:
Discovery Evaluation
• Reviewing 2 webscale discovery
products for potential purchase.
• Decision & Implementation Measures/Tools:
• Stakeholder usability tests
• Stakeholder satisfaction surveys
• Ongoing Measures:
• Actual usage stats
• Change in usage stats of collection
• Informal observation during user interaction
10. Project 2:
Discovery Evaluation
• RESULTS (besides a new search box):
• Greater insight into user experience with these
products and searching in general
• Clear justification for purchase of preferred product
based on evidence
• Potential justification for ongoing expense
• Branding opportunity for new search across campus
11. Project Proposal Template
Goals
What is this project trying to achieve?
All factors to be
determined by the
Measures
How will measure the success of the project against the goals
set above?
Will testing or research be required?
Related Library Goals
How does this project advance our Library Goals &
Strategies?
Team with
consultation of the
stakeholders.
12. Attributions
• “talk” icon made by Yannick from www.flaticon.com, licensed
under CC BY 3.0
• “bright light bulb”, “plan”, “working”, “man in a party dancing
with people”, thumbs up” icons made by Freepik from
www.flaticon.com, licensed under CC BY 3.0
Editor's Notes
Not all projects were done this way, but many of mine were. We know what’s good for our users and our library, right? We’re the professionals.
Even the best ideas won’t have impact if no one knows about them, or if they don’t fit larger goals.
Transparency and accountability!
Change management is huge
Make every project iterative.
4 clear goals set out and agreed upon by stakeholders (well, librarians and staff)
Negative comments from students who had been at the “old” desk but new students loved it. No one had trouble finding us.
Lots of sharing between staff and librarians that didn’t take place before.
Expensive product,
Other factors weighed in also, but these were key
“triangulation”
Doesn’t end after implementation
By-products unrelated to project but very useful
Among other criteria, these ones force projects to declare their allegiance to our strat plan and their criteria for success
Timeline can implement milestones for regular check in, potential kill switch