SlideShare a Scribd company logo
PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL AND
IT’S TYPES
- MS. PRIYANKA
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
 Objective assessment of an individual’s performance
in a systematic way.
Factors Measured in Performance Appraisal:
1) Job Knowledge
2) Quality and Quantity of output
3) Initiative
4) Leadership abilities
5) Supervision
6) Dependability
7) Co-operation
8) Judgment
9) Versatility
10) Health etc.
Terms used for Performance Appraisal
 Performance Rating
 Employee Assessment
 Employee Performance Review
 Personnel Appraisal
 Performance Evaluation
 Employee Evaluation, and
 Merit Rating
Need For PA
 To effect promotions based on competence and
performance
 To confirm the services of probationary employees
on the completion of the probation period.
 Assessment of training and development needs of
employees
 To decide upon a pay raise (as in the unorganized
sector)
 Communicate employees about their current
performance status.
 Assist employees with constructive criticism and
guidance.
 Provides a format for dialogue between the
superior and the subordinate.
 Determines the effectiveness of HR programmes
(selections, training, transfers).
Process of PA:
Objectives of Performance
Appraisal
Informing Job Expectations
Design an Appraisal Program
Appraise Performance
Performance Interview
Archive Appraisal Data
Use Appraisal Data for
appropriate purposes
Feedback
Performance
Management
Methods of PA:
1) PAST ORIENTED METHODS
2) FUTURE ORIENTED METHODS
A) RATING SCALES:
• Consists of several numerical scales, each
representing a job-related performance criteria
• e.g. punctuality, dependability, initiative, co-
operation etc.
• Each Scale ranges from ‘best to worst’.
• Raters checks the appropriate performance level on
each criterion, then computes the employee’s total
numerical score.
B. Checklist Method:
 A checklist of statements on the traits of the employees
is prepared in ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ column. Depending upon the
number of ‘yes’ the total score is arrived at. When the
points are allotted to the checklist, the technique
becomes a ‘weighted checklist’.
 e.g. Does employee possess adequate knowledge
about the job?
 Response – Yes--------------No
Advantages:
 Low cost
 Easy to administer
 Little training required
 Standardized format
Disadvantages:
 Rater’s bias
 Improper HR weighs
 Discrete rating values only
C. Forced Choice Method:
 Rater is given series of statements about an employee
and is forced to select statements which are ready
made.
 The rater is forced to choose statement which
indicates most or least descriptive of the employee
arranged in blocks of two or more.
 E.g. Learns Fast…………………….Works Hard
Advantage:
No personal bias accommodated
Disadvantage:
Inaccurately framed or formed statements.
D. Forced Distribution Method
Advantage:
 Eliminates abnormality of performance
Disadvantage:
Normal distribution assumed
Unrealistic
Central tendency errors present
E. Critical Incident Method:
This approach focuses on certain critical
behavior's of an employee that make all the
difference between effective and non-effective
performance of a job.
Such incidents are recorded by the superiors as
and when they occur.
Advantages:
Actual job behaviors recorded
Ratings supported by descriptions
Easy feedback
Reduces bias
Subordinate improvement increases
Disadvantages:
 Overemphasis on negative incidents
 Forgetting incidents
 Strict supervision
 Too much feedback
 Negative perception on incidents
F. Behaviorally Anchored Rating
Scales(BARS):
 The scale represent a range of descriptive statements of
behavior varying from the least to the most effective.
 A rater is expected to indicate which behavior on each scale
best describes an employee’s performance.
Contd…….
Advantage:
 Overcoming rating errors
Disadvantage:
 Inherent distortions
G. Field Review Method
It is an appraisal by someone outside the assesse’s
own department, usually from corporate office or
HR department.
Advantage:
Unbiased evaluation for promotions to
managerial positions.
Contd…………………..
Disadvantages:
Unfamiliarity with work environment by
outsider.
Unavailable observation of actual work
behavior.
H. Performance Tests and Observations:
It is a Test of knowledge or skill.
Test may be of pen and paper variety or an
actual demonstration of skills.
Advantage:
 Formulated tests are focused to evaluate potential.
Disadvantage:
 High cost of test formulation and administration.
I. Confidential Records
Maintained mostly in government departments, though
its application in the industry is not ruled out.
A typical confidential record (ACR) shall have 14 items:
Attendance
Team work
Leadership
Self expression (written or oral)
Initiative
Reasoning ability (ability to understand new
material)
Technical ability (job knowledge)
Originality and resoucefulness
Area of work complimenting the person
Judgment
Integrity
 Responsibility, and
Indebtedness and memo served
Advantages:
High confidentiality and secrecy
Feedback to the employee in adverse entry
Disadvantages:
High subjectivity
Manipulated ratings
J. Essay Method:
The rater describes the employee within a number
of broad categories:
Overall impression of the employee
Promotability of the employee.
The jobs employee is able to qualify
Strength and weakness of the employee
Training and development assistance needed to
the employee
Advantage:
Gaps are filled with relevant and extra
information
Disadvantages:
Highly dependent on writing skills of rater
Forgetfulness of rater to record proper details
K. Cost Accounting
Evaluates performance from the monetary returns the
employee yields to his/her organization.
Advantages:
 A quantifiable evaluation
 Contribution to the organization identified
Disadvantages:
 A quantifiable evaluation
 Contribution to the organization identified
L. Comparative Evaluation Approaches
Compares one worker’s performance with
that of his/her co-workers.
The comparison is done by two methods:
1) Ranking Method
2) Paired-comparison Method
i) Ranking Method
Superior ranks subordinates based on merit, starting
from ‘best’ to the ‘worst’.
e.g. A is better than B, B is better than C.
ii) Paired – Comparison Method:
Employees are rated by pairs
e.g. A B C
2. Future Oriented Methods:
A. Management By Objectives:
This method rates the objectives achieved by the
employee as stated by the management.
The process involves:
 Establishing goals and expected outcomes for employees
 Setting performance standards
 Evaluation of goals achieved
 Establishing new goals and strategies to achieve
unaccomplished goals
Advantages:
Appropriate for employees in managerial
positions
Disadvantages:
Not applicable in every work environment
Short term goals emphasized over long term
goals
B. Psychological appraisal
This technique assesses employees’ potential in
their future performance instead of the past
season.
In-depth interviews with discussions and
psychological tests are administered by
supervisors.
This appraisal technique focuses on the
emotional, motivational and intellectual aspects of
the employees that affect performance.
Advantage:
Identifying potentials of employees in totality.
Disadvantages:
Slow and costly process
Quality is dependent on the skills of
psychologists administering the process
C. Assessment Centers
• This choice of appraisal uses outsourced professional
appraisal assessors in a neutral environment.
• Job related exercises are administered and evaluated by
trained assessors to evaluate job performance.
Various characteristics that are professionally assessed
include:
Assertiveness
Communication ability
Power of persuasion
Planning and organizational skills
Self confidence
Stress level
Energy level
Decision making capability
Creativity
Administrative ability
Mental alertness
Advantages
Conducive assessing environment
Professional experienced assessors
Defines clear criteria for promotions
Disadvantages
Traveling and lodging costs
Psychologist fees
Interpersonal skills of employee being
assessed
D. 360-degree feedback
 This performance appraisal technique is systematic in
its collection of data on group performance where
specific groups of individuals are evaluated.
 These comprise team members, customers,
stakeholders, supervisors and peers.
 Anyone with useful information on improving an
employee’s productivity or job performance can be
enlisted as an appraiser.
Advantages:
Wide range of potential appraisers
Useful to give broader perspective feedback to
employees
Greater opportunities for self-development
Multi-source feedback which is helpful
Easy to measure inter-personal skills
Easy to develop team building skills
Disadvantages:
Intimidation from multi-sources feedback.
Unprofessional multiple raters who may gang
up on specific employees.
Untrained raters on balanced and objective
feedback
THANKYOU

More Related Content

What's hot

Performance appraisal form of wipro
Performance appraisal form of wiproPerformance appraisal form of wipro
Performance appraisal form of wipro
elenavogel8
 
Performance appraisal (Human Resource Management)
Performance appraisal (Human Resource Management)Performance appraisal (Human Resource Management)
Performance appraisal (Human Resource Management)
Kevin Prathick
 
Manpower Planning
Manpower PlanningManpower Planning
Manpower Planning
BIT
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisal
SHUBHAM MAHESHWARI
 
Measuring results and behaviors
Measuring results and behaviorsMeasuring results and behaviors
Measuring results and behaviors
PiryaHussain
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisalVishy Vincent
 
Performance management system
Performance management systemPerformance management system
Performance management system
tsheten
 
Hr scorecard
Hr scorecardHr scorecard
Hr scorecard
Rudrakshi Bhadauria
 
Employees Attitude
Employees AttitudeEmployees Attitude
Employees AttitudeObaid Ahmed
 
Performance Management System
Performance Management SystemPerformance Management System
Performance Management System
Etki Management Consulting
 
Performance Appraisal
Performance AppraisalPerformance Appraisal
Performance Appraisal
Seta Wicaksana
 
Performance Management and Feedback - SHRM
Performance Management and Feedback - SHRMPerformance Management and Feedback - SHRM
Performance Management and Feedback - SHRM
Drishti Bhalla
 
Performance appraisals
Performance appraisalsPerformance appraisals
Performance appraisals
Abhisek Gupta
 
Performance Appraisal and problems associated
Performance Appraisal and problems associatedPerformance Appraisal and problems associated
Performance Appraisal and problems associated
Kamlesh Mithbavkar
 
Performance management and Appraisal
Performance management and AppraisalPerformance management and Appraisal
Performance management and AppraisalRoneeta Banik
 
Performance analysis 2013
Performance analysis 2013Performance analysis 2013
Performance analysis 2013
Kerry Harrison
 

What's hot (20)

Performance appraisal form of wipro
Performance appraisal form of wiproPerformance appraisal form of wipro
Performance appraisal form of wipro
 
Performance pp tnew
Performance pp tnewPerformance pp tnew
Performance pp tnew
 
CAREER MANAGEMENT
CAREER MANAGEMENTCAREER MANAGEMENT
CAREER MANAGEMENT
 
Performance appraisal (Human Resource Management)
Performance appraisal (Human Resource Management)Performance appraisal (Human Resource Management)
Performance appraisal (Human Resource Management)
 
Manpower Planning
Manpower PlanningManpower Planning
Manpower Planning
 
Human Resource Management
Human Resource ManagementHuman Resource Management
Human Resource Management
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisal
 
Measuring results and behaviors
Measuring results and behaviorsMeasuring results and behaviors
Measuring results and behaviors
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisal
 
Performance management system
Performance management systemPerformance management system
Performance management system
 
Staffing
StaffingStaffing
Staffing
 
Hr scorecard
Hr scorecardHr scorecard
Hr scorecard
 
Employees Attitude
Employees AttitudeEmployees Attitude
Employees Attitude
 
Performance Management System
Performance Management SystemPerformance Management System
Performance Management System
 
Performance Appraisal
Performance AppraisalPerformance Appraisal
Performance Appraisal
 
Performance Management and Feedback - SHRM
Performance Management and Feedback - SHRMPerformance Management and Feedback - SHRM
Performance Management and Feedback - SHRM
 
Performance appraisals
Performance appraisalsPerformance appraisals
Performance appraisals
 
Performance Appraisal and problems associated
Performance Appraisal and problems associatedPerformance Appraisal and problems associated
Performance Appraisal and problems associated
 
Performance management and Appraisal
Performance management and AppraisalPerformance management and Appraisal
Performance management and Appraisal
 
Performance analysis 2013
Performance analysis 2013Performance analysis 2013
Performance analysis 2013
 

Similar to Performance appraisal

Performance appraisal concepts and method
Performance appraisal  concepts and methodPerformance appraisal  concepts and method
Performance appraisal concepts and methodPranav Kumar Ojha
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisal
Ujjwal Sharma
 
APPARAISAL METHODS
APPARAISAL METHODSAPPARAISAL METHODS
APPARAISAL METHODS
Anil Ravish
 
Performance appraisal.pptx
Performance appraisal.pptxPerformance appraisal.pptx
Performance appraisal.pptx
DrAsifMohammad
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisal
pabitra1986
 
Performance appraisals and management
Performance appraisals and managementPerformance appraisals and management
Performance appraisals and management
Tanzeela Munawar
 
performance appraisals and management
performance appraisals and managementperformance appraisals and management
performance appraisals and managementMohamed Abdelshafy
 
Performance Appraisal
Performance AppraisalPerformance Appraisal
Performance Appraisal
Gautam Varshney
 
2918255-PPT-Performance-Appraisal.ppt
2918255-PPT-Performance-Appraisal.ppt2918255-PPT-Performance-Appraisal.ppt
2918255-PPT-Performance-Appraisal.ppt
Deekshithrai5
 
Performance-Appraisal.ppt
Performance-Appraisal.pptPerformance-Appraisal.ppt
Performance-Appraisal.ppt
sujitha108318
 
Management Performance Appraisal
Management Performance AppraisalManagement Performance Appraisal
Management Performance Appraisal
Marathwada College of Education
 
Performance appraisal methods
Performance appraisal methodsPerformance appraisal methods
Performance appraisal methodskitturashmikittu
 
Performance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copyPerformance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copyBismah Adam
 
Performance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copyPerformance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copyBismah Adam
 
Performance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copyPerformance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copyBismah Adam
 
Performance management
Performance managementPerformance management
Performance management
Nalin Goel
 

Similar to Performance appraisal (20)

50913
5091350913
50913
 
Performance appraisal concepts and method
Performance appraisal  concepts and methodPerformance appraisal  concepts and method
Performance appraisal concepts and method
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisal
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisal
 
APPARAISAL METHODS
APPARAISAL METHODSAPPARAISAL METHODS
APPARAISAL METHODS
 
Performance appraisal.pptx
Performance appraisal.pptxPerformance appraisal.pptx
Performance appraisal.pptx
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisal
 
Performance appraisals and management
Performance appraisals and managementPerformance appraisals and management
Performance appraisals and management
 
performance appraisals and management
performance appraisals and managementperformance appraisals and management
performance appraisals and management
 
Performance Appraisal
Performance AppraisalPerformance Appraisal
Performance Appraisal
 
2918255-PPT-Performance-Appraisal.ppt
2918255-PPT-Performance-Appraisal.ppt2918255-PPT-Performance-Appraisal.ppt
2918255-PPT-Performance-Appraisal.ppt
 
Performance-Appraisal.ppt
Performance-Appraisal.pptPerformance-Appraisal.ppt
Performance-Appraisal.ppt
 
Pm
PmPm
Pm
 
Management Performance Appraisal
Management Performance AppraisalManagement Performance Appraisal
Management Performance Appraisal
 
Pa3
Pa3Pa3
Pa3
 
Performance appraisal methods
Performance appraisal methodsPerformance appraisal methods
Performance appraisal methods
 
Performance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copyPerformance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copy
 
Performance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copyPerformance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copy
 
Performance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copyPerformance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copy
 
Performance management
Performance managementPerformance management
Performance management
 

Performance appraisal

  • 2. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL  Objective assessment of an individual’s performance in a systematic way. Factors Measured in Performance Appraisal: 1) Job Knowledge 2) Quality and Quantity of output 3) Initiative 4) Leadership abilities 5) Supervision
  • 3. 6) Dependability 7) Co-operation 8) Judgment 9) Versatility 10) Health etc.
  • 4. Terms used for Performance Appraisal  Performance Rating  Employee Assessment  Employee Performance Review  Personnel Appraisal  Performance Evaluation  Employee Evaluation, and  Merit Rating
  • 5. Need For PA  To effect promotions based on competence and performance  To confirm the services of probationary employees on the completion of the probation period.  Assessment of training and development needs of employees  To decide upon a pay raise (as in the unorganized sector)
  • 6.  Communicate employees about their current performance status.  Assist employees with constructive criticism and guidance.  Provides a format for dialogue between the superior and the subordinate.  Determines the effectiveness of HR programmes (selections, training, transfers).
  • 7. Process of PA: Objectives of Performance Appraisal Informing Job Expectations Design an Appraisal Program Appraise Performance Performance Interview Archive Appraisal Data Use Appraisal Data for appropriate purposes Feedback Performance Management
  • 8. Methods of PA: 1) PAST ORIENTED METHODS 2) FUTURE ORIENTED METHODS A) RATING SCALES: • Consists of several numerical scales, each representing a job-related performance criteria
  • 9. • e.g. punctuality, dependability, initiative, co- operation etc. • Each Scale ranges from ‘best to worst’. • Raters checks the appropriate performance level on each criterion, then computes the employee’s total numerical score.
  • 10. B. Checklist Method:  A checklist of statements on the traits of the employees is prepared in ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ column. Depending upon the number of ‘yes’ the total score is arrived at. When the points are allotted to the checklist, the technique becomes a ‘weighted checklist’.  e.g. Does employee possess adequate knowledge about the job?  Response – Yes--------------No
  • 11. Advantages:  Low cost  Easy to administer  Little training required  Standardized format Disadvantages:  Rater’s bias  Improper HR weighs  Discrete rating values only
  • 12. C. Forced Choice Method:  Rater is given series of statements about an employee and is forced to select statements which are ready made.  The rater is forced to choose statement which indicates most or least descriptive of the employee arranged in blocks of two or more.  E.g. Learns Fast…………………….Works Hard
  • 13. Advantage: No personal bias accommodated Disadvantage: Inaccurately framed or formed statements.
  • 15. Advantage:  Eliminates abnormality of performance Disadvantage: Normal distribution assumed Unrealistic Central tendency errors present
  • 16. E. Critical Incident Method: This approach focuses on certain critical behavior's of an employee that make all the difference between effective and non-effective performance of a job. Such incidents are recorded by the superiors as and when they occur.
  • 17. Advantages: Actual job behaviors recorded Ratings supported by descriptions Easy feedback Reduces bias Subordinate improvement increases
  • 18. Disadvantages:  Overemphasis on negative incidents  Forgetting incidents  Strict supervision  Too much feedback  Negative perception on incidents
  • 19. F. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales(BARS):  The scale represent a range of descriptive statements of behavior varying from the least to the most effective.  A rater is expected to indicate which behavior on each scale best describes an employee’s performance. Contd…….
  • 20.
  • 21. Advantage:  Overcoming rating errors Disadvantage:  Inherent distortions
  • 22. G. Field Review Method It is an appraisal by someone outside the assesse’s own department, usually from corporate office or HR department. Advantage: Unbiased evaluation for promotions to managerial positions. Contd…………………..
  • 23. Disadvantages: Unfamiliarity with work environment by outsider. Unavailable observation of actual work behavior.
  • 24. H. Performance Tests and Observations: It is a Test of knowledge or skill. Test may be of pen and paper variety or an actual demonstration of skills.
  • 25. Advantage:  Formulated tests are focused to evaluate potential. Disadvantage:  High cost of test formulation and administration.
  • 26. I. Confidential Records Maintained mostly in government departments, though its application in the industry is not ruled out. A typical confidential record (ACR) shall have 14 items: Attendance Team work Leadership Self expression (written or oral) Initiative
  • 27. Reasoning ability (ability to understand new material) Technical ability (job knowledge) Originality and resoucefulness Area of work complimenting the person Judgment Integrity  Responsibility, and Indebtedness and memo served
  • 28. Advantages: High confidentiality and secrecy Feedback to the employee in adverse entry Disadvantages: High subjectivity Manipulated ratings
  • 29. J. Essay Method: The rater describes the employee within a number of broad categories: Overall impression of the employee Promotability of the employee. The jobs employee is able to qualify Strength and weakness of the employee Training and development assistance needed to the employee
  • 30. Advantage: Gaps are filled with relevant and extra information Disadvantages: Highly dependent on writing skills of rater Forgetfulness of rater to record proper details
  • 31. K. Cost Accounting Evaluates performance from the monetary returns the employee yields to his/her organization. Advantages:  A quantifiable evaluation  Contribution to the organization identified Disadvantages:  A quantifiable evaluation  Contribution to the organization identified
  • 32. L. Comparative Evaluation Approaches Compares one worker’s performance with that of his/her co-workers. The comparison is done by two methods: 1) Ranking Method 2) Paired-comparison Method
  • 33. i) Ranking Method Superior ranks subordinates based on merit, starting from ‘best’ to the ‘worst’. e.g. A is better than B, B is better than C. ii) Paired – Comparison Method: Employees are rated by pairs e.g. A B C
  • 34. 2. Future Oriented Methods: A. Management By Objectives: This method rates the objectives achieved by the employee as stated by the management. The process involves:  Establishing goals and expected outcomes for employees  Setting performance standards  Evaluation of goals achieved  Establishing new goals and strategies to achieve unaccomplished goals
  • 35. Advantages: Appropriate for employees in managerial positions Disadvantages: Not applicable in every work environment Short term goals emphasized over long term goals
  • 36. B. Psychological appraisal This technique assesses employees’ potential in their future performance instead of the past season. In-depth interviews with discussions and psychological tests are administered by supervisors. This appraisal technique focuses on the emotional, motivational and intellectual aspects of the employees that affect performance.
  • 37. Advantage: Identifying potentials of employees in totality. Disadvantages: Slow and costly process Quality is dependent on the skills of psychologists administering the process
  • 38. C. Assessment Centers • This choice of appraisal uses outsourced professional appraisal assessors in a neutral environment. • Job related exercises are administered and evaluated by trained assessors to evaluate job performance. Various characteristics that are professionally assessed include: Assertiveness Communication ability Power of persuasion Planning and organizational skills
  • 39. Self confidence Stress level Energy level Decision making capability Creativity Administrative ability Mental alertness
  • 40. Advantages Conducive assessing environment Professional experienced assessors Defines clear criteria for promotions
  • 41. Disadvantages Traveling and lodging costs Psychologist fees Interpersonal skills of employee being assessed
  • 42. D. 360-degree feedback  This performance appraisal technique is systematic in its collection of data on group performance where specific groups of individuals are evaluated.  These comprise team members, customers, stakeholders, supervisors and peers.  Anyone with useful information on improving an employee’s productivity or job performance can be enlisted as an appraiser.
  • 43. Advantages: Wide range of potential appraisers Useful to give broader perspective feedback to employees Greater opportunities for self-development Multi-source feedback which is helpful Easy to measure inter-personal skills Easy to develop team building skills
  • 44. Disadvantages: Intimidation from multi-sources feedback. Unprofessional multiple raters who may gang up on specific employees. Untrained raters on balanced and objective feedback