This presentation was provided by Alberto Pepe of Authorea, during the NISO hot topic event "Preprints." The virtual conference was held on April 21, 2021.
This presentation was provided by Leslie McIntosh of Ripeta, during the NISO hot topic event "Preprints." The virtual conference was held on April 21, 2021.
This presentation was provided by Kathryn Funk of the National Library of Medicine, during the NISO hot topic event "Preprints." The virtual conference was held on April 21, 2021.
On the Reproducibility of Science: Unique Identification of Research Resourc...Nicole Vasilevsky
Poster presentation at the Data Information Literacy Symposium at Purdue University in Indiana, Sept. 2013. This study is published here: https://peerj.com/articles/148/
Data Visualization in Biomedical Sciences: More than Meets the EyeNils Gehlenborg
In science, data visualization serves two primary purposes. The first is to explore data sets interactively and the second is to communicate discoveries. However, the requirements for visualizations employed in these activities are very different. Therefore, the software tools used for these purposes are typically disconnected, creating significant challenges for reproducibility and effective communication of discoveries in data-driven biomedical science. In this presentation, I will address how a new approach to creating data visualization tools can connect data analysts and other stakeholders inside and outside the scientific community. I will introduce and demonstrate the "Vistories" approach that was motivated by these question.
Presented at the 5th Cancer Research UK Big Data Analytics Conference on Data Visualization.
This presentation was provided by Bruce Rosenblum of Atypon, during the NISO hot topic event "Preprints." The virtual conference was held on April 21, 2021.
Wimmics seminar--drug interaction knowledge base, micropublication, open anno...jodischneider
Presentation to the INRIA WIMMICS research group 2014-10-17 about our LISC paper: Using the micropublication ontology and the Open Annotation Data Model to represent evidence within a drug-drug interaction knowledge base:
http://jodischneider.com/pubs/lisc2014.pdf
http://wimmics.inria.fr/seminars
This presentation was provided by Leslie McIntosh of Ripeta, during the NISO hot topic event "Preprints." The virtual conference was held on April 21, 2021.
This presentation was provided by Kathryn Funk of the National Library of Medicine, during the NISO hot topic event "Preprints." The virtual conference was held on April 21, 2021.
On the Reproducibility of Science: Unique Identification of Research Resourc...Nicole Vasilevsky
Poster presentation at the Data Information Literacy Symposium at Purdue University in Indiana, Sept. 2013. This study is published here: https://peerj.com/articles/148/
Data Visualization in Biomedical Sciences: More than Meets the EyeNils Gehlenborg
In science, data visualization serves two primary purposes. The first is to explore data sets interactively and the second is to communicate discoveries. However, the requirements for visualizations employed in these activities are very different. Therefore, the software tools used for these purposes are typically disconnected, creating significant challenges for reproducibility and effective communication of discoveries in data-driven biomedical science. In this presentation, I will address how a new approach to creating data visualization tools can connect data analysts and other stakeholders inside and outside the scientific community. I will introduce and demonstrate the "Vistories" approach that was motivated by these question.
Presented at the 5th Cancer Research UK Big Data Analytics Conference on Data Visualization.
This presentation was provided by Bruce Rosenblum of Atypon, during the NISO hot topic event "Preprints." The virtual conference was held on April 21, 2021.
Wimmics seminar--drug interaction knowledge base, micropublication, open anno...jodischneider
Presentation to the INRIA WIMMICS research group 2014-10-17 about our LISC paper: Using the micropublication ontology and the Open Annotation Data Model to represent evidence within a drug-drug interaction knowledge base:
http://jodischneider.com/pubs/lisc2014.pdf
http://wimmics.inria.fr/seminars
Linking assertions to evidence with the MicroPublications ontology WG evidenc...jodischneider
How can we link assertions to evidence in the scientific literature?
Discussion about the MicroPublications ontology (http://purl.org/mp/ & see http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3506 )
Presented to the WG Evidence Panel of the Addressing PDDI Evidence Gaps project https://sites.google.com/site/ddikrandir/home/wg-evidence-panel
Using ADAGE for pathway-style analysesCasey Greene
This talk was given at the Simons Institute Network Biology workshop. A video of the talk is available online:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpXDoMi4YO8
Disease Network is the science that has emerged to diagnose a disease from a network aspect
specifically. Networks are the group that interconnect to each others similarly disease networks are
the one that reveal concelled connection among apparently independent biomedical entities like
physiologic process, signaling receptors, in addition to genetic code, also they prove to exists
intitutive in addition to powerful way to learn/discover or diagnose a disease.Due to these networks,
we can now consume the elderly drugs and its method to learn/discover the new drug
accordingly.Example- Colchicine is used in gout but after repurposing it is also used in mediterranean
fever. This is because there are many factors that affect the body during mediterranean fever and
gout, we know that gout is a form of arthritis that causes pain in joints also mediterranean fever is the
one which is accompanied by pain in joints, therefore colchicine is used as a repurposed drug again.In
repurposing of medicines or drugs we first analyse the change in symptoms and identify the target
organ and accorgingly we produce a drug that is compatible with pharmacokinetics of the body. As
the availablity of transcriptomic,proteomic and metabolomic data sources are increasing day by day it helps in classification of disease .Also there are some networks reffered to as complex networks which can be called as collection of linked junctions/ nodes
Recomendations for infrastructure and incentives for open science, presented to the Research Data Alliance 6th Plenary. Presenter: William Gunn, Director of Scholarly Communications for Mendeley.
No Boundary Thinking in Bioinformatics Workshop KeynoteCasey Greene
"The bounty of the commons"
In this talk, we explore how public data can become more valuable with reuse. This reuse helps us get to the bottom of cases where we are certain and wrong and helps us ask better questions.
Publishers are caretakers of science. Part of that work is maintaining the integrity of scientific literature. Science builds directly upon past work, so we need to be sure that we are building upon a solid foundation and not faulty research. Publishers need to take an active role in monitoring and tracking faulty, retracted research and its influence. I'm asking publishers to (1) clearly mark retracted papers; (2) alert authors who have already cited a retracted paper; and (3) before publishing an article, check its bibliography for retracted papers.
Retracted papers should be clearly marked everywhere they appear, but today that is not the case. Publishers can also use the CrossRef CrossMark service, which lets readers check for article updates (such as retraction) from a little red ribbon at the top of an article. Checking for citations to retracted articles, and limiting future citations, can help science self-correct by shoring up its foundations.
BioVariance - Pediatric Pharmacogenomics in Drug DiscoveryJosef Scheiber
This slideset gives an overview of pharmacogenomic and pediatric dosing knowledge and various influence factors. Finally it shows an example on how to use this kind of Data within predictive approaches.
This is a presentation given at the Opal Events meeting ""Drug Discovery Partnerships: Filling the Pipeline". I was speaking in a session with Jean-Claude Bradley regarding "Pre-competitive Collaboration: Sharing Data to Increase Predictability". This presentation discussed some of the work we are doing on Open PHACTS. My thanks especially to Carole Goble, Lee Harland and Sean Ekins for their comments.
Free and open access, transparent assessment and dissemination of research in a fast, shared, collaborative, participative and clear manner for all of society are some of the principles of Open Science. The recognition and adoption of open research practices is growing, including new policies that increase public access to scholarly literature and encourage openness of codes and data sharing for its reproduction. Among these initiatives which are reconfiguring scientific communication, preprints have been consolidating themselves as a promising space for free, open and transparent knowledge, streamlining the editorial process. Preprints are the first formal step in making the manuscripts publicly available before being approved by a journal.
The logics of publishing based on science guiding principles have always been in the decision-making power of the editor. From the choice of referees to the distribution of articles approved in publishing editions, the time management to publish keeping quality, periodicity and celerity regarding feedback on the output was always a challenge to editors. Moreover, this time management becomes an even greater challenge to the publishing process in Brazil, and in some parts of Latin America, whose journals’ management is mainly based on voluntary work. Given this scenario, initiatives that seek to make scientific communication faster and more transparent appear as solutions to the daily difficulties of scientific publishing, such as, for instance, preprints, continuous publication and open peer review.
In view of this new reconfiguration of the editorial process, this panel aims to discuss the panorama of fast and transparent scientific communication, seeking to share experiences that have been developed that respond to the editorial demands on the management of time and quality of the papers published in scientific journals and, particularly, to support the development of the SciELO Program preprints policy.
Syllabus
The challenges of scientific publishing and editorial ethics regarding time management and quality; initiatives for fast research communication; metrics and alternative indicators of scientific visibility; preprints and continuous communication experience in the national and international scenario; editorial dynamics of preprints and its models in the market; the demands of the continuous publication flow; open modalities of peer review: peer-review, open peer-review, and crowd-based peer review; the spaces of fast communication in scholarly social platforms.
Topics for a biology literature review pubricaPubrica
The building block of all academic research activities, regardless of discipline, is to base the work on existing knowledge and link it up. Hence, doing so correctly should be a priority for all academics. However, the task has got more and more complicated. Development of knowledge within the field of business research is growing at a tremendous pace while remaining fragmented and interdisciplinary at the same time.
More information: http://bit.ly/32WQeVz
Why pubrica?
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free, always on Time, outstanding customer support, written to Standard, Unlimited Revisions support and High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us :
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom : +44-1143520021
Linking assertions to evidence with the MicroPublications ontology WG evidenc...jodischneider
How can we link assertions to evidence in the scientific literature?
Discussion about the MicroPublications ontology (http://purl.org/mp/ & see http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3506 )
Presented to the WG Evidence Panel of the Addressing PDDI Evidence Gaps project https://sites.google.com/site/ddikrandir/home/wg-evidence-panel
Using ADAGE for pathway-style analysesCasey Greene
This talk was given at the Simons Institute Network Biology workshop. A video of the talk is available online:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpXDoMi4YO8
Disease Network is the science that has emerged to diagnose a disease from a network aspect
specifically. Networks are the group that interconnect to each others similarly disease networks are
the one that reveal concelled connection among apparently independent biomedical entities like
physiologic process, signaling receptors, in addition to genetic code, also they prove to exists
intitutive in addition to powerful way to learn/discover or diagnose a disease.Due to these networks,
we can now consume the elderly drugs and its method to learn/discover the new drug
accordingly.Example- Colchicine is used in gout but after repurposing it is also used in mediterranean
fever. This is because there are many factors that affect the body during mediterranean fever and
gout, we know that gout is a form of arthritis that causes pain in joints also mediterranean fever is the
one which is accompanied by pain in joints, therefore colchicine is used as a repurposed drug again.In
repurposing of medicines or drugs we first analyse the change in symptoms and identify the target
organ and accorgingly we produce a drug that is compatible with pharmacokinetics of the body. As
the availablity of transcriptomic,proteomic and metabolomic data sources are increasing day by day it helps in classification of disease .Also there are some networks reffered to as complex networks which can be called as collection of linked junctions/ nodes
Recomendations for infrastructure and incentives for open science, presented to the Research Data Alliance 6th Plenary. Presenter: William Gunn, Director of Scholarly Communications for Mendeley.
No Boundary Thinking in Bioinformatics Workshop KeynoteCasey Greene
"The bounty of the commons"
In this talk, we explore how public data can become more valuable with reuse. This reuse helps us get to the bottom of cases where we are certain and wrong and helps us ask better questions.
Publishers are caretakers of science. Part of that work is maintaining the integrity of scientific literature. Science builds directly upon past work, so we need to be sure that we are building upon a solid foundation and not faulty research. Publishers need to take an active role in monitoring and tracking faulty, retracted research and its influence. I'm asking publishers to (1) clearly mark retracted papers; (2) alert authors who have already cited a retracted paper; and (3) before publishing an article, check its bibliography for retracted papers.
Retracted papers should be clearly marked everywhere they appear, but today that is not the case. Publishers can also use the CrossRef CrossMark service, which lets readers check for article updates (such as retraction) from a little red ribbon at the top of an article. Checking for citations to retracted articles, and limiting future citations, can help science self-correct by shoring up its foundations.
BioVariance - Pediatric Pharmacogenomics in Drug DiscoveryJosef Scheiber
This slideset gives an overview of pharmacogenomic and pediatric dosing knowledge and various influence factors. Finally it shows an example on how to use this kind of Data within predictive approaches.
This is a presentation given at the Opal Events meeting ""Drug Discovery Partnerships: Filling the Pipeline". I was speaking in a session with Jean-Claude Bradley regarding "Pre-competitive Collaboration: Sharing Data to Increase Predictability". This presentation discussed some of the work we are doing on Open PHACTS. My thanks especially to Carole Goble, Lee Harland and Sean Ekins for their comments.
Free and open access, transparent assessment and dissemination of research in a fast, shared, collaborative, participative and clear manner for all of society are some of the principles of Open Science. The recognition and adoption of open research practices is growing, including new policies that increase public access to scholarly literature and encourage openness of codes and data sharing for its reproduction. Among these initiatives which are reconfiguring scientific communication, preprints have been consolidating themselves as a promising space for free, open and transparent knowledge, streamlining the editorial process. Preprints are the first formal step in making the manuscripts publicly available before being approved by a journal.
The logics of publishing based on science guiding principles have always been in the decision-making power of the editor. From the choice of referees to the distribution of articles approved in publishing editions, the time management to publish keeping quality, periodicity and celerity regarding feedback on the output was always a challenge to editors. Moreover, this time management becomes an even greater challenge to the publishing process in Brazil, and in some parts of Latin America, whose journals’ management is mainly based on voluntary work. Given this scenario, initiatives that seek to make scientific communication faster and more transparent appear as solutions to the daily difficulties of scientific publishing, such as, for instance, preprints, continuous publication and open peer review.
In view of this new reconfiguration of the editorial process, this panel aims to discuss the panorama of fast and transparent scientific communication, seeking to share experiences that have been developed that respond to the editorial demands on the management of time and quality of the papers published in scientific journals and, particularly, to support the development of the SciELO Program preprints policy.
Syllabus
The challenges of scientific publishing and editorial ethics regarding time management and quality; initiatives for fast research communication; metrics and alternative indicators of scientific visibility; preprints and continuous communication experience in the national and international scenario; editorial dynamics of preprints and its models in the market; the demands of the continuous publication flow; open modalities of peer review: peer-review, open peer-review, and crowd-based peer review; the spaces of fast communication in scholarly social platforms.
Topics for a biology literature review pubricaPubrica
The building block of all academic research activities, regardless of discipline, is to base the work on existing knowledge and link it up. Hence, doing so correctly should be a priority for all academics. However, the task has got more and more complicated. Development of knowledge within the field of business research is growing at a tremendous pace while remaining fragmented and interdisciplinary at the same time.
More information: http://bit.ly/32WQeVz
Why pubrica?
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free, always on Time, outstanding customer support, written to Standard, Unlimited Revisions support and High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us :
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom : +44-1143520021
20 Topics for a Biology Literature Review –PubricaPubrica
The building block of all academic research activities, regardless of discipline, is to base the work on existing knowledge and link it up. Hence, doing so correctly should be a priority for all academics. However, the task has got more and more complicated. Development of knowledge within the field of business research is growing at a tremendous pace while remaining fragmented and interdisciplinary at the same time.
For more details, please visit our website: http://bit.ly/32WQeVz
Why Pubrica?
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free, always on Time, outstanding customer support, written to Standard, Unlimited Revisions support and High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Reference: literature review writing services
Contact us :
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1143520021
The benefits of patient involvement in research and development (RE:ACT Congr...jangeissler
Presentation of Jan Geissler, Director EUPATI and Co-Founder CML Advocates Network, about the benefits of involving patients in research and development, and about EUPATI. Held at RE:ACT Conress 2016 on Research of Rare and Orphan Diseases, organized by the Blackswan Foundation on 12 March 2016 in Barcelona, Spain
What is the future of scientific communication? Open Science (Claude Pirmez)http://bvsalud.org/
Apresentação da Profª Drª Claude Pirmez na Reunião de Editores Científicos do CRICS10, em 04/12/2018
http://crics10.org/eventos/pt/event/reuniao-de-editores-cientificos/
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the closing segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Eight: Limitations and Potential Solutions, was held on May 23, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the seventh segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session 7: Open Source Language Models, was held on May 16, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the sixth segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Six: Text Classification with LLMs, was held on May 9, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the fifth segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Five: Named Entity Recognition with LLMs, was held on May 2, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the fourth segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Four: Structured Data and Assistants, was held on April 25, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the third segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Three: Beginning Conversations, was held on April 18, 2024.
This presentation was provided by Kaveh Bazargan of River Valley Technologies, during the NISO webinar "Sustainability in Publishing." The event was held April 17, 2024.
This presentation was provided by Dana Compton of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), during the NISO webinar "Sustainability in Publishing." The event was held April 17, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the second segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Two: Large Language Models, was held on April 11, 2024.
This presentation was provided by Teresa Hazen of the University of Arizona, Geoff Morse of Northwestern University. and Ken Varnum of the University of Michigan, during the Spring ODI Conformance Statement Workshop for Libraries. This event was held on April 9, 2024
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the opening segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session One: Introduction to Machine Learning, was held on April 4, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the eight and final session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session eight, "Building Data Driven Applications" was held on Thursday, December 7, 2023.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the seventh session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session seven, "Vector Databases and Semantic Searching" was held on Thursday, November 30, 2023.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the sixth session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session six, "Text Mining Techniques" was held on Thursday, November 16, 2023.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the fifth session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session five, "Text Processing for Library Data" was held on Thursday, November 9, 2023.
This presentation was provided by Todd Carpenter, Executive Director, during the NISO webinar on "Strategic Planning." The event was held virtually on November 8, 2023.
This presentation was provided by Rhonda Ross of CAS, a division of the American Chemical Society, and Jonathan Clark of the International DOI Foundation, during the NISO webinar on "Strategic Planning." The event was held virtually on November 8, 2023.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the fourth session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session four, "Data Mining Techniques" was held on Thursday, November 2, 2023.
This presentation was provided by Tiffany Straza of UNESCO, during the two-day "NISO Tech Summit: Reflections Upon The Year of Open Science." Day two was held on October 26, 2023.
More from National Information Standards Organization (NISO) (20)
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
2. Alberto Pepe
Senior Director of Strategy and
Innovation
Former researcher with 30+
publications in scholarly
communication, information
science, computational
astrophysics. First preprint in 2006!
4. In 2020, for each peer reviewed publication
about COVID-19, a preprint was posted
10.6084/m9.figshare.12033672.v18
Preprinting stats (2020)
5. It’s a great reminder of why preprints are
a reason to be cheerful. Disruption isn’t
comfortable, and it takes a lot of
adjustment. But it can, sometimes, lead to
valuable transformations.
-Hilda Bastian
I’m beginning to see the issue with
preprints. Some are absolutely junk
science that would never get into a journal
any of us heard of, yet are widely used to
support theories about how to treat
patients with deadly diseases
-Venk Murthy
6. • Fast and wide dissemination
• No wait time, no paywalls
• Record of priority with DOI
• Rapid evaluation of results,
community feedback
• No “black box” of peer review
• Preprints get cited, i.e. science
moving faster!
• Perception of low quality
• Potential misuse by media,
journalists and the public
• Inconsistent preprint policies
across journals and publishers
Challenges Benefits
11. Under Review in action
2
When manuscript is sent to
reviewers, it is ingested and
posted with DOI
1
Author opts in to Under
Review when submitting
manuscript
3
Status automatically
updated as manuscript goes
through review
4
Paper published, automatic
link toVersion of Record
assigned
12. Health Sciences
Allergy
International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
British Journal of Pharmacology
Clinical Case Reports
Clinical Otolaryngology
Computational and Systems Oncology
Echocardiography
Influenza and other respiratory viruses
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Pediatric Allergy and Immunology
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Pediatric Pulmonology
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Life Sciences
Advanced Genetics
Biotechnology Journal
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Clinical & Experimental Immunology
Ecology and Evolution
Ecology Letters
Human Mutation
Hydrological Processes
Land Degradation & Development
Microbiology Open
Natural Sciences
Molecular Ecology Resources
Molecular Ecology
Plant, Cell & Environment
PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Physical Sciences
AIChE Journal
Applied AI Letters
Engineering Reports
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society
Materials & Structures
Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences
Natural Sciences
Ecohydrology
River Research and Applications
In 2020: 11K preprints were posted via
Under Review (1.5k aboutCOVID-19)
45 participating journals
Wiley strongly supports the early and open sharing of preprints before (or simultaneous with) submission to a journal. Already, 85% of the journals Wiley publishes will consider publishing manuscripts that have been submitted to a preprint server. We updated our preprint policy in late 2019 to more fully support researchers who want to preprint (no longer differentiating between non-commercial and commercial preprint servers), and the Wiley policy recommendation is that journals should welcome submission of preprints irrespective of where those preprints have been posted.
We think preprints work better with publishers and journals involved, and that preprints will continue to complement traditional journal publishing, adding speed, openness, and faster feedback for researchers.
But things changed with COVID. Significantly.
The early, rapid dissemination that preprints provide has been at the forefront of the COVID pandemic. At a time when literally every day means more lives lost, the research world has moved faster than many would have suspected possible, producing an absolutely staggering level of research output.
According to Dimensions, in 2020 there were 205,909 publications, 38,827 preprints, 7619 clinical trials, 9,309 datasets, 1,919 patents, 5,025 policy documents, and 4,237 grants related to COVID-19. In particular in the early part of the year, preprints were rapidly established as a key part of COVID-19 research efforts, and in the early stages of the pandemic in May, preprints accounted for one quarter of research output.
The figure shown here is from a github repository that has helpful visualizations of COVID preprints over time. From this you can see that across a wide number of preprint servers, at periods there were hundreds of COVID preprints posted PER DAY.
In the last year, journals and research communities have responded with unprecedented and most likely unsustainable levels of rapid peer review and rapid publication – but perhaps the rise in adoption of preprinting might alleviate some of the pressures on the already overstrained peer review system moving forward.
But things changed with COVID. Significantly.
The early, rapid dissemination that preprints provide has been at the forefront of the COVID pandemic. At a time when literally every day means more lives lost, the research world has moved faster than many would have suspected possible, producing an absolutely staggering level of research output.
According to Dimensions, in 2020 there were 205,909 publications, 38,827 preprints, 7619 clinical trials, 9,309 datasets, 1,919 patents, 5,025 policy documents, and 4,237 grants related to COVID-19. In particular in the early part of the year, preprints were rapidly established as a key part of COVID-19 research efforts, and in the early stages of the pandemic in May, preprints accounted for one quarter of research output.
The figure shown here is from a github repository that has helpful visualizations of COVID preprints over time. From this you can see that across a wide number of preprint servers, at periods there were hundreds of COVID preprints posted PER DAY.
In the last year, journals and research communities have responded with unprecedented and most likely unsustainable levels of rapid peer review and rapid publication – but perhaps the rise in adoption of preprinting might alleviate some of the pressures on the already overstrained peer review system moving forward.
Building on the idea of rapid sharing, the explosion of preprints on COVID-19 research has also spurred a lot of debate around the need for fast vs. sure, or the inherent tension between rapid dissemination and rigorous quality control needed for proper peer review. Much of that debate has occurred on Twitter, popular science blogs, and in the lay media. And, there have been some highly publicized retractions and high-profile withdrawals (on preprint servers and in peer-reviewed publications), like the Santa Clara seroprevalence and hydroxychloroquine study capers.
Concerns expressed about the “infodemic” range from the spread of misinformation to fears about the complete undermining of public understanding and trust in science. It’s true that preprints open the box on science, and science is messy. And in the context of a plague, preprints are now receiving a significant amount of global attention. In fact, preliminary (PEER-REVIEWED) research shows that “because of the speed of their release, preprints—rather than peer-reviewed literature in the same topic area—might be driving discourse related to the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak.” All of this science at hyper speed, which then immediately makes its way into the public discourse and impacts public health policy makes it very high stakes.
I am pro-preprint, and my belief is that preprints pose no more threat to the public than peer-reviewed articles – as there are many cases of bad science making it through poor or incomplete peer review. Importantly, for all the breaking research on COVID (both preprint and peer reviewed), we need to remember that much of it will turn out to be unreliable or wrong as the science continues to build on itself over time. That said, preprints do need to be carefully caveated, and we really need to raise the media’s and the public’s understanding of what a preprint is and is not, and what peer review is and does.
Wiley strongly supports the early and open sharing of preprints before (or simultaneous with) submission to a journal. Already, 85% of the journals Wiley publishes will consider publishing manuscripts that have been submitted to a preprint server. We updated our preprint policy in late 2019 to more fully support researchers who want to preprint (no longer differentiating between non-commercial and commercial preprint servers), and the Wiley policy recommendation is that journals should welcome submission of preprints irrespective of where those preprints have been posted.
We think preprints work better with publishers and journals involved, and that preprints will continue to complement traditional journal publishing, adding speed, openness, and faster feedback for researchers.
Wiley strongly supports the early and open sharing of preprints before (or simultaneous with) submission to a journal. Already, 85% of the journals Wiley publishes will consider publishing manuscripts that have been submitted to a preprint server. We updated our preprint policy in late 2019 to more fully support researchers who want to preprint (no longer differentiating between non-commercial and commercial preprint servers), and the Wiley policy recommendation is that journals should welcome submission of preprints irrespective of where those preprints have been posted.
We think preprints work better with publishers and journals involved, and that preprints will continue to complement traditional journal publishing, adding speed, openness, and faster feedback for researchers.
Building on the idea of rapid sharing, the explosion of preprints on COVID-19 research has also spurred a lot of debate around the need for fast vs. sure, or the inherent tension between rapid dissemination and rigorous quality control needed for proper peer review. Much of that debate has occurred on Twitter, popular science blogs, and in the lay media. And, there have been some highly publicized retractions and high-profile withdrawals (on preprint servers and in peer-reviewed publications), like the Santa Clara seroprevalence and hydroxychloroquine study capers.
Concerns expressed about the “infodemic” range from the spread of misinformation to fears about the complete undermining of public understanding and trust in science. It’s true that preprints open the box on science, and science is messy. And in the context of a plague, preprints are now receiving a significant amount of global attention. In fact, preliminary (PEER-REVIEWED) research shows that “because of the speed of their release, preprints—rather than peer-reviewed literature in the same topic area—might be driving discourse related to the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak.” All of this science at hyper speed, which then immediately makes its way into the public discourse and impacts public health policy makes it very high stakes.
I am pro-preprint, and my belief is that preprints pose no more threat to the public than peer-reviewed articles – as there are many cases of bad science making it through poor or incomplete peer review. Importantly, for all the breaking research on COVID (both preprint and peer reviewed), we need to remember that much of it will turn out to be unreliable or wrong as the science continues to build on itself over time. That said, preprints do need to be carefully caveated, and we really need to raise the media’s and the public’s understanding of what a preprint is and is not, and what peer review is and does.
Building on the idea of rapid sharing, the explosion of preprints on COVID-19 research has also spurred a lot of debate around the need for fast vs. sure, or the inherent tension between rapid dissemination and rigorous quality control needed for proper peer review. Much of that debate has occurred on Twitter, popular science blogs, and in the lay media. And, there have been some highly publicized retractions and high-profile withdrawals (on preprint servers and in peer-reviewed publications), like the Santa Clara seroprevalence and hydroxychloroquine study capers.
Concerns expressed about the “infodemic” range from the spread of misinformation to fears about the complete undermining of public understanding and trust in science. It’s true that preprints open the box on science, and science is messy. And in the context of a plague, preprints are now receiving a significant amount of global attention. In fact, preliminary (PEER-REVIEWED) research shows that “because of the speed of their release, preprints—rather than peer-reviewed literature in the same topic area—might be driving discourse related to the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak.” All of this science at hyper speed, which then immediately makes its way into the public discourse and impacts public health policy makes it very high stakes.
I am pro-preprint, and my belief is that preprints pose no more threat to the public than peer-reviewed articles – as there are many cases of bad science making it through poor or incomplete peer review. Importantly, for all the breaking research on COVID (both preprint and peer reviewed), we need to remember that much of it will turn out to be unreliable or wrong as the science continues to build on itself over time. That said, preprints do need to be carefully caveated, and we really need to raise the media’s and the public’s understanding of what a preprint is and is not, and what peer review is and does.
Wiley strongly supports the early and open sharing of preprints before (or simultaneous with) submission to a journal. Already, 85% of the journals Wiley publishes will consider publishing manuscripts that have been submitted to a preprint server. We updated our preprint policy in late 2019 to more fully support researchers who want to preprint (no longer differentiating between non-commercial and commercial preprint servers), and the Wiley policy recommendation is that journals should welcome submission of preprints irrespective of where those preprints have been posted.
We think preprints work better with publishers and journals involved, and that preprints will continue to complement traditional journal publishing, adding speed, openness, and faster feedback for researchers.
Wiley strongly supports the early and open sharing of preprints before (or simultaneous with) submission to a journal. Already, 85% of the journals Wiley publishes will consider publishing manuscripts that have been submitted to a preprint server. We updated our preprint policy in late 2019 to more fully support researchers who want to preprint (no longer differentiating between non-commercial and commercial preprint servers), and the Wiley policy recommendation is that journals should welcome submission of preprints irrespective of where those preprints have been posted.
We think preprints work better with publishers and journals involved, and that preprints will continue to complement traditional journal publishing, adding speed, openness, and faster feedback for researchers.
Wiley strongly supports the early and open sharing of preprints before (or simultaneous with) submission to a journal. Already, 85% of the journals Wiley publishes will consider publishing manuscripts that have been submitted to a preprint server. We updated our preprint policy in late 2019 to more fully support researchers who want to preprint (no longer differentiating between non-commercial and commercial preprint servers), and the Wiley policy recommendation is that journals should welcome submission of preprints irrespective of where those preprints have been posted.
We think preprints work better with publishers and journals involved, and that preprints will continue to complement traditional journal publishing, adding speed, openness, and faster feedback for researchers.
A
Note that the preprint was updated with a link to the version of record automatically.
Note that the preprint was updated with a link to the version of record automatically.
Note that the preprint was updated with a link to the version of record automatically.