Assessing the impact of community development efforts in the nigeria`s state ...theijes
The International Journal of Engineering & Science is aimed at providing a platform for researchers, engineers, scientists, or educators to publish their original research results, to exchange new ideas, to disseminate information in innovative designs, engineering experiences and technological skills. It is also the Journal's objective to promote engineering and technology education. All papers submitted to the Journal will be blind peer-reviewed. Only original articles will be published.
The Area Units for Employment, Local and Technological Development: A Model f...Territorial Intelligence
Huelva 2007, International Conference of Territorial Intelligence organised in the framework of CAENTI. WORKSHOP 3: Sustainable Territorial Development Studies
Planning for a Smarter Society - Ericsson Business Review #1 2010Giorgio Andreoli
The digital revolution is deeply influencing the way new cities are designed. But the impact so far on existing cities has been limited. What is needed is one common, comprehensive model to help planners agree on priorities for
new infrastructures and new services. Adding the dynamics of ICT to present models is a necessary first step.
Apresentação no âmbito da discussão pública perante o júri do Trabalho de Projecto do Mestrado em Metropolização, Planeamento Estratégico e Sustentabilidade realizada no dia 31 de Outubro de 2012.
Assessing the impact of community development efforts in the nigeria`s state ...theijes
The International Journal of Engineering & Science is aimed at providing a platform for researchers, engineers, scientists, or educators to publish their original research results, to exchange new ideas, to disseminate information in innovative designs, engineering experiences and technological skills. It is also the Journal's objective to promote engineering and technology education. All papers submitted to the Journal will be blind peer-reviewed. Only original articles will be published.
The Area Units for Employment, Local and Technological Development: A Model f...Territorial Intelligence
Huelva 2007, International Conference of Territorial Intelligence organised in the framework of CAENTI. WORKSHOP 3: Sustainable Territorial Development Studies
Planning for a Smarter Society - Ericsson Business Review #1 2010Giorgio Andreoli
The digital revolution is deeply influencing the way new cities are designed. But the impact so far on existing cities has been limited. What is needed is one common, comprehensive model to help planners agree on priorities for
new infrastructures and new services. Adding the dynamics of ICT to present models is a necessary first step.
Apresentação no âmbito da discussão pública perante o júri do Trabalho de Projecto do Mestrado em Metropolização, Planeamento Estratégico e Sustentabilidade realizada no dia 31 de Outubro de 2012.
AUTONOMA - Stefania Gyftopoulou, Asimina Paraskevopoulou - Towards co-product...Autonoma Conference
Crisis does not predefine a specific response. It is the act and the outcome of the critique; the mental act that leads to a response. Through the act of critique, crisis has the potential to produce different realities (knowledge, values and truths). Roitman (2011) elaborately explains that “crisis is constructed as an object of knowledge” creating a new ‘normalcy’ that in its turn influences our understanding not only of ourselves but also of the position we hold in our societies. Thus crisis is about becoming.
This paper by examining the case of Athens tries to explain the relationship among grassroots practicing their emancipating autonomy and collective political action in response to crisis and municipalities’ political agendas. Crisis, being both destructive and productive gradually educates the citizens to live with the loss of the city’s contested nature resulting in the establishment of a new social imaginary and form of citizenship.
We argue that the space of grassroots movements for addressing claims through revolutionary urban practices has shifted from the public realm to academic circles to local governments’ political agendas in the municipal level though participatory design projects. Citizenship conceptualized through its substantive aspects (Staeheli, 1999: 69) underlines the significance of peoples’ ability to function with autonomy, formulating political ideas, which in the Greek context are being reconfigured by collective and participatory processes.
Public consultations, participatory methodologies and design are introduced in the production of urban space, de-constructing the dipole expert (policy makers) – non expert (citizens), promoting a collaborative model of governance. This is perceived as democratization and co-production of knowledge in order to achieve equitable urban settings, discovering a new social consciousness in design and planning.
However, does this institutionalization of participatory processes expand the field for forming new realities, socially and spatially, or does it subtract the radical aspect of grassroots’ actions by appeasing public discontent?
This note explains how to turn the outputs from the scenario building process into an agenda for action through the presentation of 2 real cases.
This document was used by Robin Bourgeois, Senior Foresight Advisor, GFAR Secretariat for the "Grassroots Foresight initiative - Training of Resource persons
Participatory Prospective Analysis –Scenario Building." This workshop was held on February 1-7, 2015 in Quezon City, The Philippines.
Check out "Empowering local organisations through foresight" by Robin Bourgeois at: http://bit.ly/17GoTt4
A New Urban Agenda in Times of Financial CapitalismRoberto Rocco
Keynote presentation by Roberto Rocco at the LANDAC Conference (Land Governance for Equitable and Sustainable Development), Muntgebouw, Utrecht, June 30 2016.
The 2016 LANDac Annual International Land Conference ‘Land governance in the context of urbanisation and climate change: Linking the rural and the urban’ will take place on Thursday 30 June and Friday 1 July in Utrecht, the Netherlands (Muntgebouw). The conference builds on the success of the 2015 International Conference in which LANDac brought together stakeholders from around the world, from a variety of backgrounds. The 2016 conference focuses on topics related to rural-urban land governance and climate change. For more information, visit http://www.landgovernance.org
What happened in Quito: An account on UN Habitat 3Roberto Rocco
This is an account of the 3rd Un Habitat Conference in Quito and an analysis of the New Urban Agenda, made by Roberto Rocco and Ana Maria Fernandez-Maldonado (TU Delft)
AUTONOMA - M. Kikidou, M. Patelida & G. Somarakis - Imagine the CityAutonoma Conference
Public space, and especially public urban space has been recognised by many scientists as a part of “commons” for local communities. From this perspective, space and society are connected through a reciprocal relationship and residents are not only receivers, but also creators of public space. This consideration appeared during the previous century and constituted the core of the controversy about the “top-down” approach of urban planning, where decision-makers and experts decide about the future of a city without public participation. One of the planning approaches, which emerged from the aforementioned criticism, was the participatory approach, which can be conducted through different methods and techniques. A technique, used for public information or interaction, is “exhibits”, which consists of exposed plans, designs, photographs, drawings or other visual displays with certain topic or audience at a specific location.
In this context, Imagine the City (ITC) developed as a series of exhibitions aiming to sparkle the dialogue among different local groups of interest (public authorities, city experts and citizens) and to fill the gap between decision-making and the plentiness of regeneration proposals for the city. Since 2010, when it was launched in the city of Chalkida, it has been a living and open network, which explores new ways and procedures to experience and shape the urban landscape. There have already been such exhibitions in 13 cities, with the participation of 632 researchers and more than 40.000 citizens.
This paper seeks to investigate ITC’s local teams’ development and to analyse whether the exhibitions impacted local communities and decision-making. What was the internal structure of local teams and how each of them collaborated with the core team? Τo what extent, have the exhibitions raised public awareness about citizens’ potential role in urban planning, encouraged groups of local citizens, and affected the decision-making processes in cities?
The Political Meaning of Informal Urbanisation: exploring the meaning of posi...Roberto Rocco
Lecture prepared for the course INTERNATIONAL URBANISATION AND HOUSING ISSUES
(Course # 34:970:655) at Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, March 30, 2015/ Updated for the Salzburg Congress on Urban Planning and Development, Addis Ababa, May 2016
The dynamics of a territory: the main actors of sustainable development in th...Territorial Intelligence
Huelva 2007, International Conference of Territorial Intelligence organised in the framework of CAENTI. WORKSHOP 3: Sustainable Territorial Development Studies
Paris2014 141211 Serge ORMAUX Territories Linking Places and Communities in t...Territorial Intelligence
Les territoires, liens entre espaces géographiques et communautés dans la transition vers le développement durable
Serge ORMAUX
serge.ormaux@univ-fcomte.fr
http://inti.hypotheses.org/
AUTONOMA - Stefania Gyftopoulou, Asimina Paraskevopoulou - Towards co-product...Autonoma Conference
Crisis does not predefine a specific response. It is the act and the outcome of the critique; the mental act that leads to a response. Through the act of critique, crisis has the potential to produce different realities (knowledge, values and truths). Roitman (2011) elaborately explains that “crisis is constructed as an object of knowledge” creating a new ‘normalcy’ that in its turn influences our understanding not only of ourselves but also of the position we hold in our societies. Thus crisis is about becoming.
This paper by examining the case of Athens tries to explain the relationship among grassroots practicing their emancipating autonomy and collective political action in response to crisis and municipalities’ political agendas. Crisis, being both destructive and productive gradually educates the citizens to live with the loss of the city’s contested nature resulting in the establishment of a new social imaginary and form of citizenship.
We argue that the space of grassroots movements for addressing claims through revolutionary urban practices has shifted from the public realm to academic circles to local governments’ political agendas in the municipal level though participatory design projects. Citizenship conceptualized through its substantive aspects (Staeheli, 1999: 69) underlines the significance of peoples’ ability to function with autonomy, formulating political ideas, which in the Greek context are being reconfigured by collective and participatory processes.
Public consultations, participatory methodologies and design are introduced in the production of urban space, de-constructing the dipole expert (policy makers) – non expert (citizens), promoting a collaborative model of governance. This is perceived as democratization and co-production of knowledge in order to achieve equitable urban settings, discovering a new social consciousness in design and planning.
However, does this institutionalization of participatory processes expand the field for forming new realities, socially and spatially, or does it subtract the radical aspect of grassroots’ actions by appeasing public discontent?
This note explains how to turn the outputs from the scenario building process into an agenda for action through the presentation of 2 real cases.
This document was used by Robin Bourgeois, Senior Foresight Advisor, GFAR Secretariat for the "Grassroots Foresight initiative - Training of Resource persons
Participatory Prospective Analysis –Scenario Building." This workshop was held on February 1-7, 2015 in Quezon City, The Philippines.
Check out "Empowering local organisations through foresight" by Robin Bourgeois at: http://bit.ly/17GoTt4
A New Urban Agenda in Times of Financial CapitalismRoberto Rocco
Keynote presentation by Roberto Rocco at the LANDAC Conference (Land Governance for Equitable and Sustainable Development), Muntgebouw, Utrecht, June 30 2016.
The 2016 LANDac Annual International Land Conference ‘Land governance in the context of urbanisation and climate change: Linking the rural and the urban’ will take place on Thursday 30 June and Friday 1 July in Utrecht, the Netherlands (Muntgebouw). The conference builds on the success of the 2015 International Conference in which LANDac brought together stakeholders from around the world, from a variety of backgrounds. The 2016 conference focuses on topics related to rural-urban land governance and climate change. For more information, visit http://www.landgovernance.org
What happened in Quito: An account on UN Habitat 3Roberto Rocco
This is an account of the 3rd Un Habitat Conference in Quito and an analysis of the New Urban Agenda, made by Roberto Rocco and Ana Maria Fernandez-Maldonado (TU Delft)
AUTONOMA - M. Kikidou, M. Patelida & G. Somarakis - Imagine the CityAutonoma Conference
Public space, and especially public urban space has been recognised by many scientists as a part of “commons” for local communities. From this perspective, space and society are connected through a reciprocal relationship and residents are not only receivers, but also creators of public space. This consideration appeared during the previous century and constituted the core of the controversy about the “top-down” approach of urban planning, where decision-makers and experts decide about the future of a city without public participation. One of the planning approaches, which emerged from the aforementioned criticism, was the participatory approach, which can be conducted through different methods and techniques. A technique, used for public information or interaction, is “exhibits”, which consists of exposed plans, designs, photographs, drawings or other visual displays with certain topic or audience at a specific location.
In this context, Imagine the City (ITC) developed as a series of exhibitions aiming to sparkle the dialogue among different local groups of interest (public authorities, city experts and citizens) and to fill the gap between decision-making and the plentiness of regeneration proposals for the city. Since 2010, when it was launched in the city of Chalkida, it has been a living and open network, which explores new ways and procedures to experience and shape the urban landscape. There have already been such exhibitions in 13 cities, with the participation of 632 researchers and more than 40.000 citizens.
This paper seeks to investigate ITC’s local teams’ development and to analyse whether the exhibitions impacted local communities and decision-making. What was the internal structure of local teams and how each of them collaborated with the core team? Τo what extent, have the exhibitions raised public awareness about citizens’ potential role in urban planning, encouraged groups of local citizens, and affected the decision-making processes in cities?
The Political Meaning of Informal Urbanisation: exploring the meaning of posi...Roberto Rocco
Lecture prepared for the course INTERNATIONAL URBANISATION AND HOUSING ISSUES
(Course # 34:970:655) at Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, March 30, 2015/ Updated for the Salzburg Congress on Urban Planning and Development, Addis Ababa, May 2016
The dynamics of a territory: the main actors of sustainable development in th...Territorial Intelligence
Huelva 2007, International Conference of Territorial Intelligence organised in the framework of CAENTI. WORKSHOP 3: Sustainable Territorial Development Studies
Paris2014 141211 Serge ORMAUX Territories Linking Places and Communities in t...Territorial Intelligence
Les territoires, liens entre espaces géographiques et communautés dans la transition vers le développement durable
Serge ORMAUX
serge.ormaux@univ-fcomte.fr
http://inti.hypotheses.org/
Appel à communication pour la 15ème conférence annuelle internationale de INTI (International Network of Territorial Intelligence - inti.hypotheses.org) :
"Économie sociale et solidaire dans les territoires"
Charleroi et Liège les 23, 24 et 25 novembre 2016
"Vulnérabilités sociales et numériques, et engagement éco-responsable : quelles perspectives de genre ?"
Communication de Marie-Stéphanie ABOUDA et Cyril MASSELOT, dans le 84e du Congrès de l'Acfas, au Colloque 14 - Les enjeux de l’opérationnalisation du développement durable pour la transition socio-écologique : un dialogue transdisciplinaire entre la France et le Québec (http://www.acfas.ca/evenements/congres/programme/84/100/14/c), organisé par le Cirodd - Isabelle LESSARD et Laure WARIDEL, École Polytechnique de Montréal, et le Réseau Transition - Laure ABRAMOWITCH et Olivier GALIBERT, Univ. de Bourgogne - Franche-Comté.
Cette communication revisite les résultats obtenus pendant le projet Movida, en les analysant par le prisme du genre.
Information, Communication et Intelligence Territoriale - Cyril Masselot, 2016Territorial Intelligence
Cyril Masselot présente l'Intelligence Territoriale, le réseau GDRI INTI, la méthode Catalyse et le rôle des sciences de l'information et de la communication dans la gouvernance terrioriale, lors du colloque Gouvernance et Communication territoriales 2016 à Mahdia, Tunisie, réseau LOTH.
Working Paper: The role of innovation for sustainable future. itdUPM meeting. 14 April 2015. Industrial Technical School, Technical University of Madrid (UPM). 13:30 - 15:30h
This training on “innovation and societal challenges” is dedicated to policy makers and business support organizations to help them better understand the context and their possible role to face the challenges.
TRANSIT Keynote at Social Innovation Vienna 2015TRANSIT Project
Learn all about transformative social innovation and the TRANSIT research project in an exciting keynote from its co-coordinator Flor Avelino of the Dutch Research Institute for Transitions (DRIFT) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
It was presented at the joint TRANSIT and SI-DRIVE "Social Innovation 2015: Pathways to Social Change" conference in Vienna on 18 November 2015.
The TRANSIT project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 613169.
A presentation delivered in Brussels on 13th february 2017 International Evidence Review 'Experimenting with Urban Living Labs (ULLs) beyond Smart City-Regions'
Applying TQM in Social Projects -Children rights and youth participation as t...InterMedia Consulting
Is it possible to deliver a “Toyota-type” social service?
That is the question that led us to start a research on TQM, lean production methods and children participation. This article is the first article draft, intended to be a “provocative” piece of information that gathers without any kind of scientific design, data from different sources.
A new relevant relationship between communities and local authorities through...José Carlos Mota
Co-creation for Smart Solutions
A new relevant relationship between communities and local authorities through a creative use of technology
José Carlos Mota, Univ. Aveiro
Innovating Public Service Delivery Through Crowdsourcing: What Role for The T...CSCJournals
The purpose of this paper is to study the involvement of the “crowd” in designing innovative public policies, and the possibility for the Third Sector to play a role in this process. To do so, we want to answer the following research question: what is the extent to which crowdsourcing is adopted in financing and delivering public services within New Public Governance arenas? In order to answer it, we employ the following approach. First of all, we will set public innovation into the context of New Public Governance; secondly, we will analyse definitions for crowdsourcing, and thirdly, we will provide an overview and crisis of crowdsourcing examples to demonstrate their significance as novel forms of public service finance and delivery. This approach evidences the potential and the outcomes of applying crowdsourcing in the public sector, and indicates the role of the actors involved: the adoption of a leadership role by the Third Sector could facilitate crowdsourcing processes. The outcome of the application of crowdsourcing in the public sector is a greater involvement of the civil society in its relationship with the State.
ASIS - Training #7 - Innovation and societal challengesarmelleguillermet
This training on “innovation and societal challenges” is dedicated to policymakers and business support organizations to help them better understand the context and their possible role to face the challenges.
Présentation d'une communication qui prend du recul sur une activité menée par la Scop Acokima, plus précisément par ma collègue Samira OULD-BOUZIAN et moi-même : nous accompagnons la Communauté de Communes de la Plaine Dijonnaise à co-construire son Projet de Territoire, selon une méthode innovante inspirée de Catalyse.
La communauté de communes des Plaines de Dijon (en Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France, dont l’acronyme usuel est CCPD) s’interroge sur ces points, et a décidé de s’engager dans la rédaction d’un document d’orientation politique important : le Projet de Territoire.
Dans une double posture d’accompagnement méthodologique et de recherche-action, cette collectivité nous a demandé d’inventer ensemble la conception et l’écriture collective de ce projet de territoire qui s’apparente à un guide pour l’action publique locale, à une feuille de route opérationnelle adoptée par les élus communautaires.
Nous avons alors imaginé une recherche action faisant appel à la méthodologie Catalyse® (inti.hypotheses.org), structurant une intelligence collective territoriale innovante pour ce territoire. Il s’agit de confronter la vision des élus, des agents, des citoyens et des acteurs locaux du territoire dans deux dimensions : quelle perception de la CCPD expriment-ils individuellement et collectivement ? Quelles projections peuvent-ils imaginer pour les 15 ou 20 ans à venir ? Quels éléments envisagent-ils pour s’accorder sur un projet de territoire commun ? Comment en hiérarchiser les éléments dans l’optique de la transition socio-écologique ?
Dans cette communication, nous nous attacherons à présenter le contexte de la recherche action, la méthodologie imaginée et expérimentée, ainsi que les premiers résultats, puisque le dispositif se terminera au printemps prochain.
Organisé par les laboratoire Sic.lab (Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication) et le GRM (Sciences de Gestion), un workshop a eu lieu à la MSH de Nice le vendredi 29 juin 2018, rassemblant praticiens et universitaires autour d’une problématique commune : les « Pratiques collaboratives et réseaux d’acteurs dans les territoires ».
Cette problématique se décline en trois axes :
1er axe : Gouvernance et réseaux : réseaux d’acteurs de l’innovation, réseaux numériques, pratiques collaboratives,
2ème axe : Identité et valorisation des territoires : esthétique, design, patrimoine et communication
3ème axe Gestion de projets territoriaux : mise en œuvre, engagement des parties prenantes, organisation collaborative.
L'objectif était de présenter une vision SIC de l’intelligence collective territoriale.
De nombreux outils de diffusion de données territoriales existent. Chaque jour, de nouveaux indicateurs de plus en plus fins sont développés et mis à disposition du public comme des décideurs locaux. Ces données et indicateurs sont diffusés via différents portails internet dont l’appropriation par les acteurs est à ce jour difficilement quantifiée et qualifiée. Une étude conjointe entre le Commissariat Général à l’Égalité des Territoires (www.cget.gouv.fr) et le laboratoire CIMEOS – MSH de Dijon, de l’Univ. de Bourgogne Franche-Comté a été lancée en 2016 afin de construire une vision concertée de l’utilisation pratique par les territoires des connaissances produites nationalement, afin d’en comprendre l’impact, d’en évaluer la prégnance dans la construction des politiques publiques au niveau local comme national. Comment des démarches de diagnostic et d’observation s’inscrivent par exemple dans des dynamiques d’intelligence territoriale actées par les acteurs locaux ?
Dans un contexte de quartiers dits « prioritaires », amenés à se transformer au gré des innovations sociales, l’intérêt est ici de comprendre comment les acteurs se sont approprié des outils d’observation du territoire pour affiner leurs stratégies et améliorer la qualité de leurs actions.
Notre enquête, menée auprès d’élus, d’associatifs, de bureaux d’études, comme de producteurs et diffuseurs de données, permet d’éclairer de nouveaux modes de communication organisationnelle. Ce projet, revêtant la forme d’une recherche-action, s’intéresse dans un second volet à la production d’indicateurs par et pour les parties prenantes d’un territoire, à leur implication en amont de la réflexion et de la définition des besoins. Il questionne donc les acteurs sur l’organisation, la production et l’usage des informations territoriales. La méthodologie adoptée combine une enquête par entretiens semi-directifs, de l’analyse des contenus et des discours, et de la veille informationnelle territoriale.
L’analyse des entretiens porte sur la perception des acteurs territoriaux de l’utilisation des données socio-économiques, des indicateurs, et de leur transformation en actions concrètes. Les résultats qui en découlent serviront à la rationalisation des pratiques dans une démarche socio-pragmatique, tournée vers des réalisations s’inscrivant dans la transition socio-écologique.
J'ai été invité par Jean Tkaczuk, président du CCRRDT (Comité consultatif de la Recherche et du Développement Technologique) de la Région Occitanie, et Béatrice Vacher, éminente collègue locale (Mines Albi), à participer au séminaire "Construire une culture cohérente" organisé à Castres, pour y présenter les recherches actuelles en Intelligence Territoriale, au sein du réseau INTI (http://inti.hypotheses.org/), et plus particulièrement la méthode Catalyse (http://www.acokima.org/savoir-faire/la-methode-catalyse/).
Inti17-Usages électoraux des outils numériques marketing-Philippe HaagTerritorial Intelligence
Usages électoraux des outils numériques marketing : nouvelle étape de la marchandisation du politique ? Philippe Haag, doctorant (dris. O. Galibert & C. Masselot)
Résilience d’un quartier populaire : enjeux d’un community management territorial. Retour sur expérience : programme Mocida, quartier de Fontaine d'Ouche, Dijon (Bourgogne, France). Comment mobiliser les citoyens aux comportements éco-responsables ? Cyril Masselot
Présentation de Noémie Fiore, Chargée de Communication pour l’ASBL Monceau-Fontaines, lors de la visite du Pôle d'Economie Sociale du CPAS de Charleroi lors de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161125 Données territoriales en ESS - entre usages et co-constructio...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Cyril MASSELOT, Stéphane DJAHANCHACHI (Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté), dans l'Atelier 16 "Intelligence collective et développement des territoires" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161125 Quelle intelligence collective autour des coopérations inter...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Rudy CLAUDOT (CESW), Alexandre MOINE (Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté), "Quelle intelligence collective autour des coopérations intercommunales ? Le cas de la wallonie (Belgique)", dans l'Atelier 16 "Intelligence collective et développement des territoires" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
Présentation de Caroline RENOUPREZ, Atout Ei, "Les entreprises d’insertion", dans l'Atelier 15 "Entrepreneuriat social et coopératif-Scop" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161125 Febecoop - Fondamentaux et enjeux actuels de l’entrepreneuria...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Stéphane BOULANGER, Febecoop, "Fondamentaux et enjeux actuels de l’entrepreneuriat coopératif", dans l'Atelier 15 "Entrepreneuriat social et coopératif-Scop" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161124 La ségrégation professionnelle selon le genre dans l'ESS - ...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Blanca MIEDES UGARTE, Celia SANCHEZ LOPEZ, Manuela A. FERNANDEZ BORRERO (Univ. de Huelva), "La ségrégation professionnelle selon le genre dans l'ESS : le cas des entreprises espagnoles insertion", dans l'Atelier 14 "Economie Sociale et Solidaire et Genre" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161124 Les initiatives féminines dans les économies sociales et so...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Giovanna TRUDA (Univ. de Salerno, Italie), "Les initiatives féminines dans les économies sociales et solidaires et leur implémentations dans le territoire. Une comparaison internationale", dans l'Atelier 14 "Economie Sociale et Solidaire et Genre" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTESSubhajit Sahu
Graph algorithms, like PageRank Compressed Sparse Row (CSR) is an adjacency-list based graph representation that is
Multiply with different modes (map)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector multiply.
2. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector multiply.
Sum with different storage types (reduce)
1. Performance of vector element sum using float vs bfloat16 as the storage type.
Sum with different modes (reduce)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector element sum.
2. Performance of memcpy vs in-place based CUDA based vector element sum.
3. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (memcpy).
4. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Sum with in-place strategies of CUDA mode (reduce)
1. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
As Europe's leading economic powerhouse and the fourth-largest hashtag#economy globally, Germany stands at the forefront of innovation and industrial might. Renowned for its precision engineering and high-tech sectors, Germany's economic structure is heavily supported by a robust service industry, accounting for approximately 68% of its GDP. This economic clout and strategic geopolitical stance position Germany as a focal point in the global cyber threat landscape.
In the face of escalating global tensions, particularly those emanating from geopolitical disputes with nations like hashtag#Russia and hashtag#China, hashtag#Germany has witnessed a significant uptick in targeted cyber operations. Our analysis indicates a marked increase in hashtag#cyberattack sophistication aimed at critical infrastructure and key industrial sectors. These attacks range from ransomware campaigns to hashtag#AdvancedPersistentThreats (hashtag#APTs), threatening national security and business integrity.
🔑 Key findings include:
🔍 Increased frequency and complexity of cyber threats.
🔍 Escalation of state-sponsored and criminally motivated cyber operations.
🔍 Active dark web exchanges of malicious tools and tactics.
Our comprehensive report delves into these challenges, using a blend of open-source and proprietary data collection techniques. By monitoring activity on critical networks and analyzing attack patterns, our team provides a detailed overview of the threats facing German entities.
This report aims to equip stakeholders across public and private sectors with the knowledge to enhance their defensive strategies, reduce exposure to cyber risks, and reinforce Germany's resilience against cyber threats.
Levelwise PageRank with Loop-Based Dead End Handling Strategy : SHORT REPORT ...Subhajit Sahu
Abstract — Levelwise PageRank is an alternative method of PageRank computation which decomposes the input graph into a directed acyclic block-graph of strongly connected components, and processes them in topological order, one level at a time. This enables calculation for ranks in a distributed fashion without per-iteration communication, unlike the standard method where all vertices are processed in each iteration. It however comes with a precondition of the absence of dead ends in the input graph. Here, the native non-distributed performance of Levelwise PageRank was compared against Monolithic PageRank on a CPU as well as a GPU. To ensure a fair comparison, Monolithic PageRank was also performed on a graph where vertices were split by components. Results indicate that Levelwise PageRank is about as fast as Monolithic PageRank on the CPU, but quite a bit slower on the GPU. Slowdown on the GPU is likely caused by a large submission of small workloads, and expected to be non-issue when the computation is performed on massive graphs.
Paris2014 141211 Blanca MIEDES Governance Agenda organizing Structural Reforms and Initiatives for the Socio Ecological Transition
1. Governance Agenda Organizing Structural
Reforms and Initiatives for the Socio-Ecological
Transition
Blanca Miedes Ugarte
Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain
C3IT
Coordinator axis Governance in GDRI INTI
13th Annual International Conference of Territorial Intelligence
Progress and Prospects of Territorial Intelligence
Paris, CNAM, 2014, December 11-12
2. 2
G. [governance]
Axis G. [governance] Governance agenda
organizing structural reforms and initiatives for
the socio-ecological transition.
3. Axis Governance
• The work of the axis “Governance” in the framework of GDRI
-INTI has been mainly raised by contributions from the teams
of the University of Salerno (Italy) and the University of
Huelva (Spain), as well as by participants’ inputs in different
seminars, thematic workshops and plenary sessions in the
framework international conferences that have been held
since January 2011, especially the meeting in Huelva 21st
and 22nd November 2013 "Social Innovation and new ways of
governance for the socio-ecological transition".
2014, December 12-13 GDRI INTI Paris 2014 3
4. 4
Teams Axis Governance
2014, December 12-13 GDRI INTI Paris 2014
5. 5
Activities
Initial topics for discussion (activities) in this Axis are:
•Structural reforms that help maintain and develop the welfare
society to improve the any- and everybody well being. <GR
reforms>
•Organizational employment and innovation reforms promoting
cooperation, copetition and participation . <GC coopetition>
•Governance initiatives in coordination and concertation,
cooperation and participation promoting territorial sustainable
development <GI initiatives>
Preparation to the FP7 proposal: Project LinkCity. It passed the
thresholds but it didn't get any funding.
6. 6
General Overview of work done
1.A synthesis on socioeconomic, political and ecological megatrends and a
critical discussion of the agendas that are being proposed by different institutions
and social groups (Europe).
1.A discussion about the emergence of new lateral and multilevel ways of
governance in deliberating and implementing different alternative agendas as
well as the role of States, regions, communities and individuals in this new
framework.
1.The role, advantages and risks of new technologies in these new governance
processes. The “smart” trend.
1.A discussion about how to reconcile the old and new ways of governance.
7. 7
1. Agendas
- Revision of the agendas for socio-ecological transition that are being
discussed or established by international institutions, think-tanks, thinking-networks
and ONG’S (for example, the European 2020 Strategy, the reports
on socio-ecological transitions of several FP7 research projects, the reports
of the New Economics Foundation, the proposal of the New Green Deal,
among others).
- All these agendas have in common the aim of fostering big structural
changes, among others:
- efficient energy use and productive reorientations,
- redefinition of local-global relationships,
- income distribution and time policies
- They deal as well with individual behavioral changes:
- Towards more sustainable stiles of life,
- the reconstruction of collective links and people empowerment through
knowledge production and sharing.
- All these transformations on the basis of new, participative, horizontal
decision making processes and citizens political empowerment.
8. 8
1. Agendas (cont.)
Current situation is that there are irreconcilable differences
regarding the aims of these agendas,
-while western liberal governmental agendas look for keeping the
system under control in order to facilitate the continuity of capital
accumulation and fostering economic growth as main drivers for life
quality, (ecological matters a driver for growth).
-more non-liberal governments, alternative research think
tanks and civil organization agendas seek a transition to a more
radical and permanent transformation of the model of development
(“degrowth”).
9. 2. The emergence of new lateral multilevel ways of
9
governance and the role of
different actors.
In the meanwhile people make their own agenda: rising of collaborative
economy.
With a more political approach a wide arrange of social
movements and organized groups (such as “indignados”, occupy
everywhere, transition towns, “degrowhth” networks and communities…) are
becoming more active alternative political actors.
On the other hand, a threefold system of tensions (global-local, public-private
and State-citizenship) is affecting the ability of the existing systems of
territorial governance to deal with their specific social-ecological tensions.
The complex management of this tensions on the ground often brings about a
cooptation of the term “participation”
10. 3. Role, advantages, risks of new technologies in
The effects of technology are directly linked to their use;
They can promote democracy but help dictatorships in the same way.
They can enhance individuals’ enlighten but surveillance as well.
The mass media can enhance social innovation but social hysteria as well…
They can mobilize a lot of people but they can exclude most disfavored at the
same time.
One of the most important challenges of governance systems in the future is
how to use new technologies to enhance territorial intelligence.
10
governance processes.
12. TI: “Smart cities/regions
Territorial Intelligence”
12/12/14
12
Who has to be intelligent,
the city or the people?
“Smart”: Narrowly focused on the
"efficiency" (energy, mobility…) and on
specific devices…
It is assumed that the feedback of "big
data" will guide us in an unconscious
decision-making process.
But is it not precisely an aware/shared
responsibility what we need?
13. TI: “Smart cities/Regions
Territorial Intelligence”
12/12/14
13
Fuente: http://www.qtorb.com
Recover the
meaning of “link”
and working
together:
•Spaces for
interaction.
•Tools.
•Training.
14. Principles
Open decision making
Sustainable Life stiles
Participation
Collaboration- competition
Resources access
Cooperation
Wellbeing and empowerment of all and everyone
Co-building Learning Solidarity Coordination
Rationality Transparency Forecast Precaution
Privacy
Accessibility
To avoid negative effects of ICT, to bring
back the intelligence to people
2014, December 12-13 GDRI INTI Paris 2014 14
15. -Active citizens need more active governance. Wee need to overcome the
social engineering approach towards more reflexive, deliberative, and
participative decision making and instrumental planning processes.
-How do we reconcile the old and new modes of governance? how do we
encourage the capacity building for the creation or regeneration of the
links between territorial public structures and communitarian, citizen’s
movements?
-The conclusion is a research agenda for producing new knowledge and
new participatory tools for supporting all these processes and for contributing
to build up actors and governments capabilities to deal with main
governance challenges.
15
4. How to reconcile the old and new ways of
governance.
16. New research agenda
1. Scenarii facing the crisis and the restructuration of regional
16
and local administrations.
2. New modes of self-management, lateral governance:
citizens' initiatives, « commons », collaborative economy,
p2p…
3. Role, advantages, risks of new technologies in governance
processes.
4. Building capacity for new modes of governance: Linking local
public agents and emerging initiatives.
17. 1. Scenarios facing the crisis and the restructuration of regional and
local administrations.
•Analyse récentes réformes (axe juridique).
•Rationalité économique ou recentrage dans un
contexte de délégitimation?
18. 2. New modes of self-management, lateral governance: citizens'
initiatives, « commons », collaborative economy, p2p…
•Visibilisation des nouvelles initiatives dans des
domaines communs, non marché, non publics.
•Analyse des nouveaux modèles d'autogestion et des
règles de fonctionnement (E. Ostrom)
19. 2. New modes of self-management, lateral governance: citizens'
initiatives, « commons », collaborative economy, p2p…
• Taking into account different scenarios on employment and
market and non-market activities, which kind of social
innovation is emerging in market and non market economic
activities?
• How to identify more promising practices, how to scale them,
how to inscribe them in institutional frameworks?
• How to conceptualize an axiology about participation and
commons as drivers of social, economic, cultural life
instead/complementing the current single driver competition?
• How to create and recreate social and communitarian
proactive links?
19
20. 3. Role, advantages, risks of new technologies in governance
processes.
• Analysing different scenarios
• Ethical principles (privacy, inclusiveness…)
21. 4. Building capacity for new modes of governance: Linking
local public agents and emerging initiatives.
• Comment concilier les anciens et les nouveaux modes de gouvernance?
• Construction de capacités pour la création régénération de liens
– Dans les structures publiques dans le territoire.
The traditional rules of good governance (openness, participation,
accountability, effectiveness and coherence) are necessary conditions
but not sufficient ones.
• There is an important demand of a lot of participatory tools to
manage all these kind of tensions .
– Dans les mouvements d'autogestion.
• There is an important demand of a lot of new interactive tools to
produce shared knowledge for common actions.
22. Thank you for your attention
Merci pour votre attention
Gracias por su atención
Grazie per la vostra attenzione
شكرا لهتمامك
Köszönöm a figyelmet
Vă mulţumesc pentru atenţie
謝謝您的關注
Vielen Dank für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit
Kiitos huomiota
Σας ευχαριστώ για την προσοχή σας
Dziękuję za uwagę
Спасибо за Ваше внимание
İlginiz için teşekkürler
2014, December 12-13 GDRI INTI Paris 2014 22