Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

102 Planning Theory I


Published on

Published in: Education, Technology, Real Estate
  • Be the first to comment

102 Planning Theory I

  1. 1. LOGO College of Engineering, Pune Planning Theory: The Evolution
  2. 2. What is Theory..  A set of assumptions, propositions, or accepted facts that attempt to prove a plausible or rational explanation of cause and effect relationships among a group of observed phenomenon.  Theory is thus a mental model of perceived reality.
  3. 3. History of Planning.. Development..  Cultural variance • American and European Countries Accomplish: A through understanding of various Planning Theories and their development.. Planning: Physical form depicting ideology to a fourth power of Government.
  4. 4. Non-linear Pattern of Evolution  The evolution of planning theory reflects the changing society and its changing demand on planning.  Given the pluralistic nature of modern society, the multiple directions social development trends, and the uncertainty caused by unforeseeable social events, the trajectory of planning theory evolution reflects diverse planning approaches and a non-linear pattern.  Planning history shows that the development of planning theory is segmental, diverse, and diverging, rather than integrated, uni-directional, and linear.
  5. 5. American Planning Theories..  1900 - planning was understood as to design urban form, beautify cityscape, and reform urban society through improving the built environment at that time.  After WWII (89) - re-building destroyed cities made European planners focus almost totally on urban physical development .  1980 – Globalization.
  6. 6. American Planning Theory..  Unregulated ―free market‖ capitalist competition led to the 1929 economic crisis and stimulated the appeal for government intervention.  President Roosevelt’s policy adviser Rexford Tugwell championed planning as a so-called ―Fourth Power‖ of government in allocating resources by state power.  The generation of American planners were involved in resource allocation and redistribution rather than just guiding development and designing townscapes, the traditional tasks to planners.
  7. 7. New Models and Theories..  Rational Model: collection and examination of data, evaluation of alternatives, and creation of systems for implementation.  What is the theoretical foundation of the legitimacy of planning as a government intervention in a democratic society?  Karl Mannheim’s Theory vs Frederick’s opposition.
  8. 8. Karl Mannheim’s Theory  Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction (1940): planning is necessary to free and open societies.  Mannheim’s four social structures based on levels of participation and centralization: Planning is inevitable due to technology and population growth. The problem therefore is not ―if planning is needed‖ but ―who would plan?‖
  9. 9. Frederick Hayek  The famous economist who led the opposition to Mannheim, argued that government at best is clumsy and inefficient so what we should fear is bloated government intervening in all societal decisions.  As a result, he asked for getting freedom from the government.  “freedom from” and “freedom to”  Mannheim’s supporters believed that government through public intervention affords us freedom to do things that we otherwise would be unable to do (such as large scale infrastructure and development projects), and the argument of government’s coercion is a mistake.
  10. 10. New Deal  The development of planning theory met American people’s expectation that government would intervene when economic crises occur.  The New Deal initiated by President Roosevelt with the adoption of Keynesian policy was characterized by a high level of state intervention, and urban planning was employed as a powerful tool of government intervention.  This renovated institutional arrangement between the state, the marketplace and the society was advanced because it helped solve the problems of economic crisis and social tension during the recession.
  11. 11. Planning Stronghold.. The policy influenced policy-makers not only in the US but also in other west nations from the 1930s to the early 1940s. Other Planning Theories: Rational planning, Communicative or Collaborative Planning, Incremental Planning, Advocacy planning. Planning theory should be viewed as having only relative Truth and the definition of planning is specific to time and circumstances.
  12. 12. Intro to Political economy..  Various Theories led to debate..  Dutch professor A. Faludi labeled the two directions as ―theory of planning‖ and ―theory in planning‖; the former addresses the nature, function and procedure of planning and the latter covers theoretical frameworks of planning work including land use, transportation etc.  However, it is still debatable which planning task is more important in a particular context—the process (e.g. organizing public participation) or the content (e.g. designing policy to control sprawl).
  13. 13. Progressive Planning..  A group of advocacy planning supporters turned to a more radical direction, they believed that the current American institutional setting could no longer meet the needs of the poor so a new institutional arrangement became a must.  They advocated public ownership of land, promotion of industries that could absorb the most unemployed, and a bottom-up approach in planning process.  The movement was named ―progressive planning‖ with social justice, public participation, and planning legitimacy as goals.
  14. 14. New-Marxist structuralism The relationship between planning and local politics from a political economy perspective. The outcome included the theory of ―City as a Growth Machine‖ and, later, influential Regime Theory. Regime Theory indicates that the effectiveness of planning work relies on a common ground of planners and the leading regime. Without the support or at least mutual understanding of the regime, planners find it impossible to get plans realized.
  15. 15. Next.. Friedmann’s Transactive Planning: Top down vs. bottom up approach. Thomas Kuhn Classification of Planning Theories. Paradigm (A. Faludi) Thank You..