Open ECBCheck community based,  low cost quality certification  Advancing the Quality Landscape Berlin – 2 nd  May 2009, Online Educa 2009  Ulf-Daniel Ehlers
Open ECBCheck Core Group InWEnt, UNU, ILO, FAO, UNEP,  CoL, UNITAR, CGIAR, SPIDER IICD, EFMD, EFQUEL, GDLN, AVU Exteded Group Open University Catalunya, Namibia Qualifications Authority,  South African Qualifications Authority, BIBB, University of Western Cape, South Africa University of Philippines International Advisory Board No int.  agreement on  quality available ICT & eLearning  in CB growing openness inclusiveness transparency consensus  recognition Quality for  E-Learning in  Capacity Building
Low Cost, Community Based Peer-Review Recognition – creating recognition through dialogue Consensus – building on international consensus of CBOs Openness – to existing concepts and strategies and experiences Inclusiveness – multistakeholder involvement Transparency – clear and transparent criteria & processes Open ECBCheck
Open ECBCheck Vision CBO Partners Quality Improvement  for  Capacity Building E-Learning Peer-Review
Open ECBCheck Architecture Dr. Ulf-Daniel  Ehlers ::: European Foundation for Quality in E-Learning ::: info@qualityfoundation.org validation experience institutions programs mutual peer-review & recognition of quality exchange best practice Meetings, Workshops Accra June 2008 Berlin DEC 2008 Dakar May 2009 Berlin DEC 2009 Consensus based Self- Assessment and review  Guidleines Label as Community  recognition Self-Evaluation,  Peer-Review Label Tools and Criteria Community around  Open ECB Check
Community of Practice on Quality Membership in Community  Community of Practice Benchmarking | Learning | Sharing Materials – Instruments - Connexions Quality Assessment  |  Self-Assessment |    |  Peer-Review |    |  Certification  | Quality Development
Open ECBCheck Tools  DELAN  DEL-Zert Criteria Courses & Programme (M: 44 / E: 11) Criteria  Institutions (M: 33 / E: 17) EFMD  CEL EFQUEL  UNIQUe ISO  19796-1 cover e-Learning  international in scope agreed on by networks or consortia
Qualitative Weighing & Evaluation Mandatory Criteria (M): Criteria have to be verifiable positively Excellency Criteria (E): Criteria are evaluated with a scale (1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = adequate, 3 = excellent) 2 Levels of Criteria Criteria frame ‚pre-adjusted‘ -  but can be ‚calibrated‘ individually!
III. Certification  Process: Label (1) Inquiry & Application (2) Eligibity Check (3) Self-Assessment (6) Open ECBCheck Label  (valid for three years) Registration in Community, Code of Practice, Q-WIKI positive (5) Awarding Body Decision  (4) Peer-Review of Self-Assessment Report  Access to  Q-Forum Feedback &  Advice not  eligible Improvement  Report minimum criteria failed
Open ECBCheck Target Groups Open ECBCheck Adaptations Self-Assessment Certification  (Peer-Review) Dev. of Local  Profiles Capacity Building Organisations Internal (recognition, quality imporvement)   External (for partner  capacity building)    Educational organisations  (HE, VET, etc.)   Governmental Organisations (National Quality Assurance Agencies)  Regional Networks, Communi-ties (LA, East Africa, etc.)  
Why “Open Quality Initiative”?  Open  ECBCheck Self-Assessment Certification/  Learning Report Peer-Review Validation Community Based  (Capacity Building  Organisations) Low-Cost  (mutual exchange,  light structure) Improvement  oriented (Learning Report) Community Level Benchmarking Learning  Sharing Certification Level Self-Assessment Peer-Review Certification
Thank you very much! …sign up for quality…  http://www.qualityfoundation.org http://www.inwent.org Monika Soddenmann, Capacity Building International (InWEnt), Germany Dr. Ulf-Daniel Ehlers,  University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

OPEN ECBCheck Presentation

  • 1.
    Open ECBCheck communitybased, low cost quality certification Advancing the Quality Landscape Berlin – 2 nd May 2009, Online Educa 2009 Ulf-Daniel Ehlers
  • 2.
    Open ECBCheck CoreGroup InWEnt, UNU, ILO, FAO, UNEP, CoL, UNITAR, CGIAR, SPIDER IICD, EFMD, EFQUEL, GDLN, AVU Exteded Group Open University Catalunya, Namibia Qualifications Authority, South African Qualifications Authority, BIBB, University of Western Cape, South Africa University of Philippines International Advisory Board No int. agreement on quality available ICT & eLearning in CB growing openness inclusiveness transparency consensus recognition Quality for E-Learning in Capacity Building
  • 3.
    Low Cost, CommunityBased Peer-Review Recognition – creating recognition through dialogue Consensus – building on international consensus of CBOs Openness – to existing concepts and strategies and experiences Inclusiveness – multistakeholder involvement Transparency – clear and transparent criteria & processes Open ECBCheck
  • 4.
    Open ECBCheck VisionCBO Partners Quality Improvement for Capacity Building E-Learning Peer-Review
  • 5.
    Open ECBCheck ArchitectureDr. Ulf-Daniel Ehlers ::: European Foundation for Quality in E-Learning ::: info@qualityfoundation.org validation experience institutions programs mutual peer-review & recognition of quality exchange best practice Meetings, Workshops Accra June 2008 Berlin DEC 2008 Dakar May 2009 Berlin DEC 2009 Consensus based Self- Assessment and review Guidleines Label as Community recognition Self-Evaluation, Peer-Review Label Tools and Criteria Community around Open ECB Check
  • 6.
    Community of Practiceon Quality Membership in Community Community of Practice Benchmarking | Learning | Sharing Materials – Instruments - Connexions Quality Assessment | Self-Assessment | | Peer-Review | | Certification | Quality Development
  • 7.
    Open ECBCheck Tools DELAN DEL-Zert Criteria Courses & Programme (M: 44 / E: 11) Criteria Institutions (M: 33 / E: 17) EFMD CEL EFQUEL UNIQUe ISO 19796-1 cover e-Learning international in scope agreed on by networks or consortia
  • 8.
    Qualitative Weighing &Evaluation Mandatory Criteria (M): Criteria have to be verifiable positively Excellency Criteria (E): Criteria are evaluated with a scale (1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = adequate, 3 = excellent) 2 Levels of Criteria Criteria frame ‚pre-adjusted‘ - but can be ‚calibrated‘ individually!
  • 9.
    III. Certification Process: Label (1) Inquiry & Application (2) Eligibity Check (3) Self-Assessment (6) Open ECBCheck Label (valid for three years) Registration in Community, Code of Practice, Q-WIKI positive (5) Awarding Body Decision (4) Peer-Review of Self-Assessment Report Access to Q-Forum Feedback & Advice not eligible Improvement Report minimum criteria failed
  • 10.
    Open ECBCheck TargetGroups Open ECBCheck Adaptations Self-Assessment Certification (Peer-Review) Dev. of Local Profiles Capacity Building Organisations Internal (recognition, quality imporvement)   External (for partner capacity building)    Educational organisations (HE, VET, etc.)   Governmental Organisations (National Quality Assurance Agencies)  Regional Networks, Communi-ties (LA, East Africa, etc.)  
  • 11.
    Why “Open QualityInitiative”? Open ECBCheck Self-Assessment Certification/ Learning Report Peer-Review Validation Community Based (Capacity Building Organisations) Low-Cost (mutual exchange, light structure) Improvement oriented (Learning Report) Community Level Benchmarking Learning Sharing Certification Level Self-Assessment Peer-Review Certification
  • 12.
    Thank you verymuch! …sign up for quality… http://www.qualityfoundation.org http://www.inwent.org Monika Soddenmann, Capacity Building International (InWEnt), Germany Dr. Ulf-Daniel Ehlers, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany