Open Access Progress and Promise in the CGIAR ConsortiumCIARD Movement
The presentation provided an overview and update on the CGIAR Consortium's progress in Open Access, including some of the challenges and opportunities of advocating for Open Access across the Consortium.
The webinar was presented by Piers Bocock, Director of Knowledge Management and Communication at the CGIAR Consortium. He is responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of the Consortium’s Knowledge Management, Communications, and IT strategies, leveraging best practices in these disciplines to help the Consortium deliver on its mandate.
Going for Gold and Greener Pastures: Open Access Explained
Presentation by Lisa Kruesi, Helen Morgan and Andrew Heath from The University of Queensland Scholarly Publishing and Digititisation Service for Open Access Week, October 2012.
Open Access Progress and Promise in the CGIAR ConsortiumCIARD Movement
The presentation provided an overview and update on the CGIAR Consortium's progress in Open Access, including some of the challenges and opportunities of advocating for Open Access across the Consortium.
The webinar was presented by Piers Bocock, Director of Knowledge Management and Communication at the CGIAR Consortium. He is responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of the Consortium’s Knowledge Management, Communications, and IT strategies, leveraging best practices in these disciplines to help the Consortium deliver on its mandate.
Going for Gold and Greener Pastures: Open Access Explained
Presentation by Lisa Kruesi, Helen Morgan and Andrew Heath from The University of Queensland Scholarly Publishing and Digititisation Service for Open Access Week, October 2012.
Open access (OA) to scholarly literature recently hit a major milestone: Half of all research articles published become open access, either immediately or after an embargo period. Are the articles you read among them? What about the articles you write? Are the journals to which you submit open-access friendly? What about the journals for which you peer review? Are there any reasons why the public should not have access to the results of taxpayer-funded research?
In this slideshow, Jill Cirasella (Associate Librarian for Public Services and Scholarly Communication, Graduate Center, CUNY) explains the motivation for OA, describes the details of OA, and differentiates between publishing in open access journals (“gold” OA) and self-archiving works in OA repositories (“green” OA). She also dispels persistent myths about OA and examines some of the challenges to OA.
Uncovering Open Access: seizing the moment and making it work for you – experiences from the ground
Presentation by Karen Bruns, Marketign Manager HSRC Press South Africa at the Locating the Power of the In-between conference
Presentation given at the University of Sydney, 11 October 2013. An introduction to open access publishing for academics in the humanities and social sciences.
Fifty shades of green and gold: open access to scholarly informationhierohiero
Presentation for Urban Research Utrecht, a research school at Utrecht University, on Open Access to scholarly information in geography and planning, focussing of advantages, disadvantges, various forms, costs and actions of stakeholders
The changing in the world of research communication: from the perspective of people working in information and communication roles and at the supply end of research.
Presentation by Buhle Mbambo-Thata, Director, Library Services UNISA and Electronic Information for Libraries (eIFL) South Africa at the Locating the Power of the In-between conference July 08
What is Open Access? An Introduction to OAAbby Clobridge
An introduction to Open Access: What is Open Access? Why Open Access? Open Access Journals (Gold OA), Open Access Repositories (Green OA), Open Access Policies, Discoverability of OA content through Metadata, Interoperability, and the Open Knowledge Environment
ICTs for Improving Efficiency and Effectiveness in Agricultural Research, Education and Extension of NARES 13-22 Nov 2018
ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore
By Leena Shah,
Managing Editor & Ambassdor, DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Open access for the inaugural @OpenResLDN meeting 2015 01 19Chris Banks
Slides that I will speak to at the inaugural meeting of OpenResLDN on 19th January 2015. January 2015 sees the 350th anniversary of the first ever journal publication - the Journal des Savants. We are now in the 21st year of the Open Access movement and the UK and European policies are really beginning to drive change and innovation. That change is not fast enough for some, and for others - particularly those covered by the policies, or seeking to implement policy - just a little too fast sometimes.
Digital Publishing in the Arts and Humanitiesmattphillpott
Dr Matt Phillpott
Fellows Forum (School of Advanced Study, University of London)
3 June 2015, 1pm-2pm
Talk about the various forms of digital publishing open to artresearchers including articles, monographs, blogs, websites, presentations, and repositories.
Open access (OA) to scholarly literature recently hit a major milestone: Half of all research articles published become open access, either immediately or after an embargo period. Are the articles you read among them? What about the articles you write? Are the journals to which you submit open-access friendly? What about the journals for which you peer review? Are there any reasons why the public should not have access to the results of taxpayer-funded research?
In this slideshow, Jill Cirasella (Associate Librarian for Public Services and Scholarly Communication, Graduate Center, CUNY) explains the motivation for OA, describes the details of OA, and differentiates between publishing in open access journals (“gold” OA) and self-archiving works in OA repositories (“green” OA). She also dispels persistent myths about OA and examines some of the challenges to OA.
Uncovering Open Access: seizing the moment and making it work for you – experiences from the ground
Presentation by Karen Bruns, Marketign Manager HSRC Press South Africa at the Locating the Power of the In-between conference
Presentation given at the University of Sydney, 11 October 2013. An introduction to open access publishing for academics in the humanities and social sciences.
Fifty shades of green and gold: open access to scholarly informationhierohiero
Presentation for Urban Research Utrecht, a research school at Utrecht University, on Open Access to scholarly information in geography and planning, focussing of advantages, disadvantges, various forms, costs and actions of stakeholders
The changing in the world of research communication: from the perspective of people working in information and communication roles and at the supply end of research.
Presentation by Buhle Mbambo-Thata, Director, Library Services UNISA and Electronic Information for Libraries (eIFL) South Africa at the Locating the Power of the In-between conference July 08
What is Open Access? An Introduction to OAAbby Clobridge
An introduction to Open Access: What is Open Access? Why Open Access? Open Access Journals (Gold OA), Open Access Repositories (Green OA), Open Access Policies, Discoverability of OA content through Metadata, Interoperability, and the Open Knowledge Environment
ICTs for Improving Efficiency and Effectiveness in Agricultural Research, Education and Extension of NARES 13-22 Nov 2018
ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore
By Leena Shah,
Managing Editor & Ambassdor, DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Open access for the inaugural @OpenResLDN meeting 2015 01 19Chris Banks
Slides that I will speak to at the inaugural meeting of OpenResLDN on 19th January 2015. January 2015 sees the 350th anniversary of the first ever journal publication - the Journal des Savants. We are now in the 21st year of the Open Access movement and the UK and European policies are really beginning to drive change and innovation. That change is not fast enough for some, and for others - particularly those covered by the policies, or seeking to implement policy - just a little too fast sometimes.
Digital Publishing in the Arts and Humanitiesmattphillpott
Dr Matt Phillpott
Fellows Forum (School of Advanced Study, University of London)
3 June 2015, 1pm-2pm
Talk about the various forms of digital publishing open to artresearchers including articles, monographs, blogs, websites, presentations, and repositories.
Durham Leading Research Programme: Academic ImpactJamie Bisset
Aims of the Module
Researchers intending to publish are met with an increasingly complex world of options, influences and pressures. The digital landscape and developments in open access publishing provide additional dissemination channels beyond traditional print; bibliometric tools purport to measure journals’ academic impact ; funder mandates, institutional mandates and routine research assessment exercises place additional requirements on authors which may influence their choice of where and how to publish. The aim of this module is to help researchers navigate this territory and make well- informed decisions.
Content
• Background to the development and use of publication metrics as research indicators, and the issues surrounding this.
• Journal metrics: assess the academic impact of journals, including Journal Impact Factors, Journal Citation Reports and other measures.
• Citations and author metrics: tools available to assess an authors’ individual citation counts and impact, including the h-index.
Approach
The module will take the form of a workshop with on-screen demonstrations and hands-on opportunity, with some presentation and hand-out materials highlighting issues and discussions within the academic community.
Intended outcomes
By the end of the session participants will:
• Increased awareness of the various journal and author metrics available.
• Developed understanding of the key issues around the use of these metrics and what research behaviours might be incentivised.
• Awareness of the potential opportunities for exploring wider academic and non-academic impact of publications from altmetric tools available.
Durham Researcher Development Programme 2015-16: Bibliometric Research Indica...Jamie Bisset
There is an ever-increasing need to make your research more visible as you establish your career, and metrics to measure your research performance when it comes to thinking about promotion and probation.
This session will focus on bibliometric research indicators (such as the Journal Impact Factor and SCImago, author metrics such as the h-index and g-index) and sources for accessing citation data (Web of Science, Journal Citation Reports and Google Scholar). These may be one of several factors to consider when thinking about where to submit an article manuscript for publication to maximise the potential academic impact of the research, and tools useful to be familiar with if they form part of any research evaluation you and your authored journal papers may be subject to.
An additional section will also look at tips to consider when writing an article abstract to maximise its discoverability and cite-ability.
Learning Outcomes:
• Understanding of meaning and intended uses of bibliometric research indicators
• Understanding of how some key indicators (JIF, H-index) are calculated
• Ability to make a judgement as to the appropriateness and limitations of such indicators
• Ability to use online datasets to view and calculate key bibliometric measures
• Awareness of some factors which can increase the visibility and discoverability of your own research in bibliographic databases.
Previous participants have said:
"The session has helped provide me with the basic information on Journal Impact and where to find information such as an author's h-index. It will be useful for future journal submission consideration."
"This session was very useful for me to become familiar with the topic."
Slides from a webinar for the Royal Society of Chemistry on 24th February 2016.
See the URI below to access the full report from the RSC survey "The role of libraries in open access publishing":
http://www.rsc.org/campaigns/m/lc/lc16013/open-access/
We often hear that we are in a transitional phase of open access publishing, but it is not always clear how we will reach a fully open access environment, what that will look like and what it means for scholarly research. This webinar will draw insights from a librarian survey we ran in 2015, discussing areas where librarians feel a lack of confidence and presenting technical and policy developments.
Register to gain a deeper understanding of:
• The historical and political context of scholarly publishing
• Funder and other policy requirements for Open Access (e.g. HEFCE and RCUK in the UK, Horizon2020 in Europe and NIH is the USA)
• Developing models of OA including “Gold”, “Green” and “hybrid”
• Jisc support services for OA
• Social media and OA – e.g. “Altmetrics” (alternative metrics) as potential indicators of impact beyond the traditional readership of scholarly material
Open Access, open research data and open scienceIryna Kuchma
This presentation covers open access (OA) and OA theses & dissertations: why you should take action now; impact & metrics; copyright; open research data; open science; and new skills & competencies for librarians. Target audience: PhD students and librarians
O Futuro da Biblioteconomia no Brasil: Workshop Interativo
Quando: 07 de outubro de 2015 – 10h – 15h
Onde: Auditório do INRAD
Instituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP
Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, s/nº – Rua 1 – Cerqueira César – São Paulo, SP.
As part of Open Access Week 2016 John Murtagh, Research Publications Manager at LSHTM gives a briefing on OA and how researchers can make their work Open Access without having to pay for it via the Gold Open Access route.
Over 90% of journals allow a final draft version of the paper to be self-archived in a research repository - making that research OA. John outlines what OA is, the different types and methods currently available in publishing and how researchers can achieve. Also covered is how to keep your self-archiving author rights using an author addendum and how to use Research Online effectively for wider dissemination. Also covered is making book chapters OA, the REF OA requirements and using the SHERPA RoMEO/FACT service to searching journal self-archiving policies.
Open Access: Research Output Gone Viral!Amos Kujenga
Presentation on Open Access delivered at the National University of Lesotho, Roma, Lesotho on 22 October 2013 during workshop to mark the International Open Access Week and also celebrate LELICO's 10th anniversary
Presentation at the American Association of Publishers Professional and Scholarly Publishing Division conference in February 2016 on the coming cost of open access compliance, and how we can reduce it
Presentation at the Joint Executive Board Meeting of the European Federation of Psychology Students’ Associations (EFPSA), October 28, 2014,Dobra Voda, Serbia
Overview of UKRI Open Access Policy 2022
Covers the Scope, requirements and funding for policy. Outlines the key actions for authors. Focus on Research Articles (April 2022) but also overview of requirements for long-form publications (Monographs, book chapters, edited collections) from January 2024.
Intended audience: Durham University staff and student authors of research articles.
Presentation embedded alongside further information at https://libguides.durham.ac.uk/open_research/policies/ukri
Version 1.1 2022.03.02
Effective Searching: Part 4 - Constructing your search (Web Version)Jamie Bisset
Part 4 (of 5) Overview of effective search strategies.
- PART 1: Overview, Key concepts and keywords
- PART 2: Broadening your search
- PART 3: Narrowing your search
- PART 4: Constructing your search
- PART 5: Citation searching
Part 4 covers:
- Grouping your search terms
- Constructing your search
- Using the search history
- Evaluating your search
Effective Searching: Part 3 - Narrow your search (Web Version)Jamie Bisset
Part 3 (of 5) Overview of effective search strategies.
- PART 1: Overview, Key concepts and keywords
- PART 2: Broadening your search
- PART 3: Narrowing your search
- PART 4: Constructing your search
- PART 5: Citation searching
Part 3 covers:
- Combining search concepts
- Services which differ: Google Scholar, Nexis, Ebsco, Scopus
- Proximity Connectors
- Phrase searching
- Excluding terms
- Searching with facets
- Filtering your results using facets
- Boolean connectors
Effective Searching: Part 2 - Broaden your search (Web Version)Jamie Bisset
Part 2 (of 5) Overview of effective search strategies.
- PART 1: Overview, Key concepts and keywords
- PART 2: Broadening your search
- PART 3: Narrowing your search
- PART 4: Constructing your search
- PART 5: Citation searching
Part 2 covers:
- Accounting for synonyms
- Accounting for changes in terminology
- Accounting for alternative spellings
- term trunctaion
- hyphenated and plural terms
- Boolean connectors, wildcards, truncation tools
Effective Searching: Part 1 - Overview, Key concepts and keywords (Web Version)Jamie Bisset
Part 1 (of 5) Overview of effective search strategies.
- PART 1: Overview, Key concepts and keywords
- PART 2: Broadening your search
- PART 3: Narrowing your search
- PART 4: Constructing your search
- PART 5: Citation searching
Part 1 covers:
- Overview of search approach
- Identifying key concepts and thinking about keywords.
Durham Part Time Distance Research Student 2019: Sample Library SlidesJamie Bisset
Sample slides from the 2019 “Part-time and Distance Doctoral Student” Event at Durham University, taken from workshops delivered by Durham University Library staff.
“By 2020 scientific publications that result from research funded by public grants provided by participating national and European research councils and funding bodies, must be published in compliant Open Access Journals or on compliant Open Access Platforms.”
- Overview of Plan S
- Key Principles and Purpose
- Key Issues of interest to authors
- Chance to provide your feedback, ask questions
“By 2020 scientific publications that result from research funded by public grants provided by participating national and European research councils and funding bodies, must be published in compliant Open Access Journals or on compliant Open Access Platforms.”
- Overview of Plan S
- Key Principles and Purpose
- Key Issues of interest to authors
- Chance to provide your feedback, ask questions
Digital tools (Presentation 2): Tools to explore...Jamie Bisset
Durham PGR Part-time Summer School 2015
Session: Digital Tools
See also:
- Presentation (Dr Nick Pearce & Dr Elaine Tan)
- Handout: Online tools (Collaboration, Networking, note-taking and impact footprint)
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
3. “on average across the NHS, [only]
about a third of relevant journals
were available free at the point of
use”
http://bit.ly/MnfGEY
Finch Report (June 2012), from data originally reported in
Heading for the Open Road: costs and benefits of transitions in
scholarly communications, RIN, PRC, Wellcome Trust, RLUK and
JISC, 2011.
4. “many researchers … in smaller and
less research-intensive institutions
… do not have access to a sufficientlywide range of titles”
http://bit.ly/MnfGEY
Finch Report (June 2012), from data originally reported in Access to
scholarly content: gaps and barriers, RIN, Publishing Research
Consortium and JISC, 2011.
5. “across central Government and its
agencies, some 17% of relevant articles
are available free at the point of use.”
http://bit.ly/MnfGEY
Finch Report (June 2012), from data originally reported in Heading for
the Open Road: costs and benefits of transitions in scholarly
communications, RIN, PRC, Wellcome Trust, RLUK and JISC, 2011.
6. “lack of access … may mean that
advice and inputs to policy-making
are delayed or incomplete."
http://bit.ly/MnfGEY
Finch Report (June 2012), from data originally reported in Rightscom.
Benefits of Open Access to Scholarly Research Outputs to the Public
Sector, Report for the Open Access Implementation Group, , 2012
7. “the voluntary sector … [often has to]
rely on reports from research
organisations and Government
departments"
http://bit.ly/MnfGEY
Finch Report (June 2012), from data originally reported in Office for
Public Management, Benefits of open access to scholarly research
for VCS organisations, JISC 2012.
8. An article that is
Open Access
can be
freely accessed
by anyone
in the world
using an
internet
connection.
11. “... free availability on the public internet, permitting any
users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or
link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for
indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for
any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or
technical barriers other than those inseparable from
gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on
reproduction and distribution, and the only role for
copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control
over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly
acknowledged and cited.“
http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
Budapest Open Access Initiative.
18. A subscription journal such as Nature
Communications offers AUTHORS:
- [GREEN] the option to publish normally & selfarchive their final peer-reviewed manuscript for free
- [GOLD] the option to pay-to-publish for a cost of
$4800-$5200
19. A subscription journal such as Nature
Communications offers AUTHORS:
- [GREEN] the option to publish normally & selfarchive their final peer-reviewed manuscript for free
- [GOLD] the option to pay-to-publish for a cost of
$4800-$5200
23. Open Access Policy
• applies to any peer-reviewed journal
articles or conference proceedings which:
24. Open Access Policy
• applies to any peer-reviewed journal
articles or conference proceedings which:
- were submitted for publication on or after
1st April 2013
- Acknowledge funding from one of the
seven UK Research Councils
26. Authors must…
• include a statement providing details of
funding supporting the research;
• include a statement, if appropriate, on how
underpinning research data can be
accessed.
27. Authors must…
• include a statement providing details of
funding supporting the research;
• include a statement, if appropriate, on how
underpinning research data can be
accessed.
• publish in journals which are compliant
with Research Council policy on Open
Access;
28. Is the journal compliant?
In order to be deemed compliant with RCUK Policy, a journal must
either:
“ [GOLD] provide, via its own website,
immediate and unrestricted access to the
final published version of the paper, which
should be made available using the Creative
Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This
may involve payment of an „Article
Processing Charge‟ (APC) to the publisher.“
29. Is the journal compliant?
In order to be deemed compliant with RCUK Policy, a journal must
either:
"provide, via its own website, immediate and unrestricted access to the final published version of the paper, which
should be made available using the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This may involve payment of an
„Article Processing Charge‟ (APC) to the publisher.“
or...
[GREEN] permit the author to deposit their
"final Accepted Manuscript in any repository,
without restriction on non-commercial reuse and within a defined period. No APC will
be payable to the publisher."
35. Support at Durham
• Checking compliance of journals (library)
• Managing and maintaining Durham
Research Online (your institutional
repository)
• RCUK Block Grant (£276,578 for 2013/14)
• Reporting back to RCUK/HEFCE
36. Writing article
for journal
What open access
options does the
journal offer
If required, will
funding be available
Article
submitted
Article
accepted
Any APC charged is
paid
37. Writing article
for journal
What open access
options does the
journal offer
If required, will
funding be available
Article
submitted
Article
accepted
Any APC charged is
paid
45. Durham Research Online
• 10,273 records in DRO
- 3,837 full text (37%)
- 87 further records embargoed (1%)
• Durham Open Access Policy
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/du_oa_policy_summary.pdf
• Add bibliographic details; Tick the box; Attach
your final accepted manuscript.
46. Durham Research Online
Department
(Faculty of Science)
Biological/
Biomedical
Chemistry
Computer Sciences
Earth Sciences
Engineering
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Records Full text
% full Publisher
in DRO deposited text
does not
permit full
text to be
made
available
347
111 31.99
47
398
154
319
595
483
839
409
125
80
73
246
242
534
134
31.41
51.95
22.88
41.34
50.10
63.65
32.76
123
8
36
59
45
96
44
% no OA
permitted
by
publisher
% that could be
achievable to
make OA via
DRO if authors
deposited full
text
13.54
86.46
30.90
5.19
11.29
9.92
9.32
11.44
10.76
69.10
94.81
88.71
90.08
90.68
88.56
89.24
47. Durham Research Online
Department
(Faculty of Arts and
Humanities)
Classics and Ancient History
English Studies
History
Modern Languages and
Cultures
Music
Philosophy
Theology and Religion
Classics and Ancient History
English Studies
Records Full text
% full Publisher
in DRO deposited text
does not
permit full
text to be
made
available
99
33 33.33
16
207
54 26.09
57
223
85 38.12
47
248
96
188
265
99
207
61
34
70
75
33
54
24.60
35.42
37.23
28.30
33.33
26.09
32
19
33
65
16
57
% no OA
permitted
by
publisher
% that could be
achievable to
make OA via
DRO if authors
deposited full
text
16.16
83.84
27.54
72.46
21.08
78.92
12.90
19.79
17.55
24.53
16.16
27.54
87.10
80.21
82.45
75.47
83.84
72.46
48. Durham Research Online
Department
(Faculty of Social Sciences
and Health)
Anthropology
Applied Social Sciences
Archaeology
Economics, Finance &
Business
Education
Geography
Government & International
Affairs
Law
Medicine & Health
Records Full text
% full Publisher
in DRO deposited text
does not
permit full
text to be
made
available
459
169 36.82
68
367
130 35.42
52
671
271 40.39
129
843
227 26.93
122
% no OA
permitted
by
publisher
14.81
14.17
19.23
14.47
% that could be
achievable to
make OA via
DRO if authors
deposited full
text
85.19
85.83
80.77
85.53
361
1083
456
120
458
209
33.24
42.29
45.83
34
170
52
9.42
15.70
11.40
90.58
84.30
88.60
645
204
31.63
173
26.82
73.18
1003
315
31.41
164
16.35
83.65
51. Initially only applied to peer-reviewed
journal articles.
Has now been extended to monographs and
book chapters.
52. “holders of grants awarded after 1st October
2013, and for existing grant-holders from
October 2014”
53. “holders of grants awarded after 1 October
2013, and for existing grant-holders from
October 2014”
“does not apply to textbooks,
54. “holders of grants awarded after 1 October
2013, and for existing grant-holders from
October 2014”
“does not apply to textbooks, 'trade' books,
55. “holders of grants awarded after 1 October
2013, and for existing grant-holders from
October 2014”
“does not apply to textbooks, 'trade' books,
general reference works
56. “holders of grants awarded after 1 October
2013, and for existing grant-holders from
October 2014”
“does not apply to textbooks, 'trade' books,
general reference works or works of fiction,
57. “holders of grants awarded after 1 October
2013, and for existing grant-holders from
October 2014”
“does not apply to textbooks, 'trade' books,
general reference works or works of fiction,
or to collections edited but not authored by
Trust grantholders …
58. “holders of grants awarded after 1 October
2013, and for existing grant-holders from
October 2014”
“does not apply to textbooks, 'trade' books,
general reference works or works of fiction,
or to collections edited but not authored by
Trust grantholders … or non-fiction work[s]
… aimed at a general audience and
published by a commercial publisher.”
59. “… to be made available through
PubMed Central (PMC) and Europe
PubMed Central (Europe PMC) as
soon as possible and in any event
within six months of the publisher's
official date of final publication.”
60. “… encourages - and where it pays
an open access fee, requires authors and publishers to licence
research papers using the Creative
Commons Attribution licence (CCBY).”
61.
62. No central institutional funding
Wellcome Trust will cover APC if the CCby licence option is available and
chosen by author.
Will also cover additional publication
costs through their inflation/flexible
funding allowance
63. Not limited to RCUK and
Wellcome Trust…
-
Action on Hearing Loss
Arthritis Research UK
Breakthrough Breast Cancer
British Heart Foundation
Cancer Research UK
Department of Health
Dunhill Medical Trust
European Commission
European Research Council
JISC
Marie Curie Cancer Care
Motor Neuron Disease Association
Parkinsons UK
65. “must ensure open access to all peerreviewed scientific publications relating to its
results”
66. “must ensure open access to all peerreviewed scientific publications relating to its
results”
- required for journal articles
67. “must ensure open access to all peerreviewed scientific publications relating to its
results”
- required for journal articles
- strongly recommended for other publication
formats
68. “must ensure open access to all peerreviewed scientific publications relating to its
results”
- must deposit the published version or final
peer-reviewed manuscript in a repository
(such as DRO), “at the latest upon publication”.
69. “must ensure open access to all peerreviewed scientific publications relating to its
results”
- must ensure the full text is accessible from
the repository within a maximum of 6 months
(12 months for social sciences & humanities)
70. “the beneficiary must [also] aim to … at the
same time [make accessible] the research
data needed to validate the results presented
in the deposited scientific publications.”
- preferably by depositing in a data
repository.
71. “the beneficiary must [also] aim to … at the
same time [make accessible] the research
data needed to validate the results presented
in the deposited scientific publications.”
- preferably by depositing in a data
repository.
76. Post-2014 REF
Announced they would be consulting
Consulted about consulting
Have ran a consultation (Durham response
available at http://bit.ly/18yuxXO)
82. Post-2014 REF
Limited to peer-reviewed journal articles and
conference papers.
Notice period from the date of the policy
announcement.
83. Post-2014 REF
Limited to peer-reviewed journal articles and
conference papers.
Notice period from the date of the policy
announcement.
Likely to have built in exclusions.
84. Post-2014 REF
Limited to peer-reviewed journal articles and
conference papers.
Notice period from the date of the policy
announcement.
Likely to have built in exclusions.
Must be accessible from the author‟s
Institutional Repository
87. … the bottom line…
REF requires deposit in an Institutional
Repository
88. … the bottom line…
REF requires deposit in an Institutional
Repository
RCUK requirements can (usually)* be met by
depositing in an Institutional Repository
89. … the bottom line…
REF requires deposit in an Institutional
Repository
RCUK requirements can (usually) be met by
depositing in an Institutional Repository
Horizon 2020 requirements can (usually)* be
met by depositing in an Institutional
Repository
90. … the bottom line…
REF requires deposit in an Institutional
Repository
RCUK requirements can (usually) be met by
depositing in an Institutional Repository
Horizon 2020 requirements can (usually)* be
met by depositing in an Institutional
Repository
91. Durham Research Online
Department
Biological/
Biomedical
Chemistry
Computer Sciences
Earth Sciences
Engineering
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Records Full text
% full Publisher
in DRO deposited text
does not
permit full
text to be
made
available
347
111 31.99
47
398
154
319
595
483
839
409
125
80
73
246
242
534
134
31.41
51.95
22.88
41.34
50.10
63.65
32.76
123
8
36
59
45
96
44
% no OA
permitted
by
publisher
% that could be
achievable to
make OA via
DRO if authors
deposited full
text
13.54
86.46
30.90
5.19
11.29
9.92
9.32
11.44
10.76
69.10
94.81
88.71
90.08
90.68
88.56
89.24
There is some division over the issue of whether rights of re-use are needed now, or will develop once ‘access’ has been firmly established.
So a subscription journal such as Nature Communications offers authors:- - the option to publish normally and self-archive their final peer-reviewed manuscript (green) for free - the option to pay-to-publish for a cost of $4800-$5200… and offers readers the option to:- - pay a subscription to access of c.£3,800 per year to access all articles from the journal site - access those articles which an author has paid to publish free form the journal site, and the less-polished final peer-reviewed manuscripts of articles from an authors OA repository 6 months after publication (or purchase access for £20+ per article) - in this last instance, £20+ is not much. But considering the number of payments by multiple readers this could amount to, the cost to the research economy more widely may be significantly more than making the article free-to-access via gold/green route.
Writing… or thinking of writing an article for a particular journal. Author needs to know options (possibly before completing writing article), and if funding is available (before submission).Fund administrators need to know expected spending of funding before an invoice/request for payment arrives.
Writing… or thinking of writing an article for a particular journal. Author needs to know options (possibly before completing writing article), and if funding is available (before submission).Fund administrators need to know expected spending of funding before an invoice/request for payment arrives.
… reminder Durham, and Russell Group more widely, has expressed a strategic preference for green (and gold where it is a pure open access journal, and not a hybrid journal).
Purposes:- - makes sure we can keep money available to cover the expected cost. - starts the process of recording how the RCUK fund is spent for reporting purposes - starts the process for making sure that if we are paying publishers, we can then easily move the published version into DRO for future REF purposes.
- (1,874 could be OA but author has not provided text) (18%) - others need confirmation by contacting publisher.
Reiterate point… REF probably looking at either a target of 70-80% open access, or a 100% target with exceptions…
Reiterate point… REF probably looking at either a target of 70-80% open access, or a 100% target with exceptions…
Reiterate point… REF probably looking at either a target of 70-80% open access, or a 100% target with exceptions…
These funders are just some of those which have an open access requirement built into their funding contracts. Some require deposit in a repository, some require publishing in an open access journal. These are mostly European and UK funders… there are many others outside of the UK which have similar open access requirements attached to any funding they provide, with varying degrees of reporting enforcement in place.
Consultation – written submissions, open invite consultation workshops, on going discussion with publishers.
Exclusions to account for exceptions (eg ECRs with no institution, overseas researchers joining during REF period, compliance targets)
Must be at least the author’s accepted manuscript. Will respect embargo periods (but likely to have recommended or required maximum embargo periods)So, could still publish in any Taylor & Francis, Sage etc. journal, have the published version locked behind a paywall, but deposit your final accepted manuscript ON ACCEPTANCE/PUBLICATION in a repository.
Must be at least the author’s accepted manuscript. Will respect embargo periods (but likely to have recommended or required maximum embargo periods)So, could still publish in any Taylor & Francis, Sage etc. journal, have the published version locked behind a paywall, but deposit your final accepted manuscript ON ACCEPTANCE/PUBLICATION in a repository.
Must be at least the author’s accepted manuscript. Will respect embargo periods (but likely to have recommended or required maximum embargo periods)So, could still publish in any Taylor & Francis, Sage etc. journal, have the published version locked behind a paywall, but deposit your final accepted manuscript ON ACCEPTANCE/PUBLICATION in a repository.
Must be at least the author’s accepted manuscript. Will respect embargo periods (but likely to have recommended or required maximum embargo periods)So, could still publish in any Taylor & Francis, Sage etc. journal, have the published version locked behind a paywall, but deposit your final accepted manuscript ON ACCEPTANCE/PUBLICATION in a repository.
Must be at least the author’s accepted manuscript. Will respect embargo periods (but likely to have recommended or required maximum embargo periods)So, could still publish in any Taylor & Francis, Sage etc. journal, have the published version locked behind a paywall, but deposit your final accepted manuscript ON ACCEPTANCE/PUBLICATION in a repository.
Must be at least the author’s accepted manuscript. Will respect embargo periods (but likely to have recommended or required maximum embargo periods)So, could still publish in any Taylor & Francis, Sage etc. journal, have the published version locked behind a paywall, but deposit your final accepted manuscript ON ACCEPTANCE/PUBLICATION in a repository.
Reiterate point… REF probably looking at either a target of 70-80% open access, or a 100% target with exceptions…