Brian Hole gave a presentation on open access, noting its advantages for research and funding opportunities. He discussed how open access aligns with funders' demands for effective research distribution. Hole also explained different open access funding models like article processing charges and print on demand. Additionally, he saw opportunities in open access books, metajournals that collect different research outputs, and specialized data and software journals.
Brian Hole - The Shift to Open Access Publishing, UCL DH 2013Brian Hole
The document summarizes the shift to open access publishing. It discusses the history of open access, including the emergence of key publishers and initiatives. It also outlines the open access business model, current policies pushing open access like funder mandates, and potential future directions like increased open access publishing of scholarly books.
Data availability policies and licensingBrian Hole
This document discusses data availability policies and licensing. It covers the social contract of science including validation, dissemination and further development. It also discusses scientific malpractice by publishers, researchers and libraries. The document advocates for fair use copyright exceptions to allow mining of text and data for research and teaching. It summarizes benefits of text mining but notes issues with the "Licenses for Europe" initiative, including an unbalanced setup and lack of representation for the technology sector. Civil society has walked out of working group discussions on text and data mining licenses.
Introducing PRIME:Publisher, Repository and Institutional Metadata ExchangeBrian Hole
"Introducing PRIME:Publisher, Repository and Institutional Metadata Exchange" – Brian Hole, Ubiquity Press.
OpenAIRE Interoperability Workshop - University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, 8 February 2013
The document summarizes a presentation given by Brian Hole, the founder and CEO of Ubiquity Press. Ubiquity Press aims to disrupt academic publishing by providing infrastructure and support to allow academic societies and universities to publish research in a way that can outcompete legacy publishers. It discusses how academic publishing is changing with new open access mandates and how Ubiquity Press offers different levels of support and services to help universities and societies set up their own publishing programs.
The document discusses moving from open access to open data in scientific publishing. It outlines the social contract of science which involves validation, dissemination and further development of research. When these principles are not followed, it can constitute scientific malpractice by various stakeholders. The presentation advocates for data journals as an incentive that can help recognize data as a valid research output and encourage data sharing by providing metrics like citations. It provides details on what constitutes a data paper and reviews factors like peer review that are important for data journals to be successful.
Disrupting academic publishing: a future role for librariesBrian Hole
The document discusses Ubiquity Press and its mission to disrupt academic publishing by returning control of publishing to universities. It provides background on Ubiquity Press, noting that it was spun out of University College London in 2012 and aims to help universities establish their own publishing platforms to lower costs and increase prestige. The document also discusses the changing landscape in academic publishing, with moves toward open access mandates in the UK, EU, and US that will require publicly funded research to be published open access.
Publishing Open Data: Incentivising RigourBrian Hole
The document discusses how open data and data publishing can incentivize rigor in research. It describes the social contract of science involving dissemination, validation, and further development of research. It suggests that openness can encourage rigor if data and methods are published and available for others to analyze. Publishing data descriptions in "data papers" allows data to be cited, enabling tracking of reuse. Data journals provide a way to publish data papers and get peer review of the data and methods described.
The document discusses research data publishing and evaluating the impact of data. It summarizes the results of an RDA survey which found that researchers currently use a variety of methods to evaluate data impact, including citation counts, downloads, and mentions in papers. However, many felt current methods are inadequate. Researchers want standardized data citation practices and metrics in the future. The document also describes Ubiquity Press's approach to publishing research data, which aims to make data publication easy and encourage data sharing through open access policies and peer review of the data itself.
Brian Hole - The Shift to Open Access Publishing, UCL DH 2013Brian Hole
The document summarizes the shift to open access publishing. It discusses the history of open access, including the emergence of key publishers and initiatives. It also outlines the open access business model, current policies pushing open access like funder mandates, and potential future directions like increased open access publishing of scholarly books.
Data availability policies and licensingBrian Hole
This document discusses data availability policies and licensing. It covers the social contract of science including validation, dissemination and further development. It also discusses scientific malpractice by publishers, researchers and libraries. The document advocates for fair use copyright exceptions to allow mining of text and data for research and teaching. It summarizes benefits of text mining but notes issues with the "Licenses for Europe" initiative, including an unbalanced setup and lack of representation for the technology sector. Civil society has walked out of working group discussions on text and data mining licenses.
Introducing PRIME:Publisher, Repository and Institutional Metadata ExchangeBrian Hole
"Introducing PRIME:Publisher, Repository and Institutional Metadata Exchange" – Brian Hole, Ubiquity Press.
OpenAIRE Interoperability Workshop - University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, 8 February 2013
The document summarizes a presentation given by Brian Hole, the founder and CEO of Ubiquity Press. Ubiquity Press aims to disrupt academic publishing by providing infrastructure and support to allow academic societies and universities to publish research in a way that can outcompete legacy publishers. It discusses how academic publishing is changing with new open access mandates and how Ubiquity Press offers different levels of support and services to help universities and societies set up their own publishing programs.
The document discusses moving from open access to open data in scientific publishing. It outlines the social contract of science which involves validation, dissemination and further development of research. When these principles are not followed, it can constitute scientific malpractice by various stakeholders. The presentation advocates for data journals as an incentive that can help recognize data as a valid research output and encourage data sharing by providing metrics like citations. It provides details on what constitutes a data paper and reviews factors like peer review that are important for data journals to be successful.
Disrupting academic publishing: a future role for librariesBrian Hole
The document discusses Ubiquity Press and its mission to disrupt academic publishing by returning control of publishing to universities. It provides background on Ubiquity Press, noting that it was spun out of University College London in 2012 and aims to help universities establish their own publishing platforms to lower costs and increase prestige. The document also discusses the changing landscape in academic publishing, with moves toward open access mandates in the UK, EU, and US that will require publicly funded research to be published open access.
Publishing Open Data: Incentivising RigourBrian Hole
The document discusses how open data and data publishing can incentivize rigor in research. It describes the social contract of science involving dissemination, validation, and further development of research. It suggests that openness can encourage rigor if data and methods are published and available for others to analyze. Publishing data descriptions in "data papers" allows data to be cited, enabling tracking of reuse. Data journals provide a way to publish data papers and get peer review of the data and methods described.
The document discusses research data publishing and evaluating the impact of data. It summarizes the results of an RDA survey which found that researchers currently use a variety of methods to evaluate data impact, including citation counts, downloads, and mentions in papers. However, many felt current methods are inadequate. Researchers want standardized data citation practices and metrics in the future. The document also describes Ubiquity Press's approach to publishing research data, which aims to make data publication easy and encourage data sharing through open access policies and peer review of the data itself.
Talk given at the “Shareable by Design: Making research data available for access” workshop, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, November 12 2014
Open Access is Just the Beginning: Disrupting PublishingBrian Hole
Ubiquity Press is a researcher-led open access publishing company founded in 2012 that aims to give control of publishing back to universities and researchers. It provides infrastructure and support to allow societies and universities to compete with large legacy publishers. Ubiquity Press takes a comprehensive approach to publishing, offering journals, books, data, software, and more. It is committed to research integrity and has measures like plagiarism checking, rigorous peer review, and support for open data and software archiving. The company also has an inclusive partnership model to help publishing partners in developing countries become independently sustainable over time.
The Ubiquity Partner Network: Global Support for PublishingBrian Hole
This document summarizes a presentation given by Brian Hole, the founder and CEO of Ubiquity Press. Ubiquity Press provides publishing infrastructure and support to help universities and researchers regain control over publishing and outcompete legacy publishers. It aims to support the full scholarly communications process, including journals, books, data, software, and hardware. Ubiquity Press also focuses on research integrity, peer review, and building an inclusive partnership model to support open access publishing worldwide.
Disrupting Academic Publishing: Returning Control to UniversitiesBrian Hole
Ubiquity Press was founded in 2012 to give universities and researchers control over publishing by providing infrastructure and support to publish open access journals and books. They aim to outcompete legacy publishers by lowering article publication fees from an average of £2,000 to more affordable rates. Ubiquity Press works with over 50 academic societies and university presses to transition their publishing programs to open access using Ubiquity Press' publishing platform and services.
The document discusses the shift to open access publishing. It provides an overview of Ubiquity Press, which publishes open access. It then discusses the history and models of open access publishing, including gold and green open access. Government policies increasingly mandate open access for publicly funded research. While large publishers initially opposed open access mandates, researcher support for open access has grown.
The PRIME project developed a system to exchange metadata between an institutional repository, subject repository, and data journal focused on archaeology. It used a subset of the DataCite schema and allowed for automatic metadata exchange as researchers deposited data in different repositories and journals. The project aimed to incentivize open data sharing and help repositories and journals work together through coordinated metadata. It completed several use cases, including a researcher depositing data in a subject repository, institutional repository, and data journal to test the automatic exchange.
Ubiquity Press is a researcher-led open access publishing company. Their presentation discusses why researchers should publish open data, how to publish data through data journals and repositories that integrate with publishers, and some cases where open data is not possible, such as when consent or confidentiality is a issue. Ubiquity Press provides services to publish a wide range of research outputs openly through their platform while balancing openness with these exceptions.
The Ubiquity Partner Network: Enabling Library-Based PublishingBrian Hole
This document summarizes a presentation given by Brian Hole, the founder and CEO of Ubiquity Press, about their company and the Ubiquity Partner Network. Ubiquity Press was founded in 2012 to give control of publishing back to universities and researchers by providing infrastructure and support to publish journals, books, and other research outputs. Their mission is to help partners outcompete legacy publishers through an open access model and comprehensive services while ensuring research integrity. They have established a partner network and plugins to enable library-based publishing through collaboration.
Open Access eBooks andScholarly PublishingBrian Hole
The document discusses open access eBooks and scholarly publishing. It notes that many scholarly monographs are overpriced and poorly distributed, while open access eBooks could help research libraries save money through a single eBook copy being usable by multiple students. Open access publishing of eBooks has yet to fully benefit disciplines like the humanities where half of scholarly output is in book form. The document advocates for collaboration between university presses to benefit from combined expertise and economies of scale. It presents Ubiquity Press's business model of low chapter processing charges and integration with research council funding as an example of fulfilling the social contract of open dissemination of scholarly work.
Overcoming Obstacles to Sharing Research DataBrian Hole
Ubiquity Press was spun out of University College London in 2012 with the mission to return control of publishing to university and society presses. The company is researcher-led with founders having extensive experience in academic publishing. Ubiquity Press takes a comprehensive approach to publishing, including journals, books, data, software and more, with the goal of advancing publishing in the interests of researchers.
The document discusses best practices for preparing data for open publication. It recommends thinking openly and planning early by creating detailed data management plans. It provides examples of repositories like GenBank, ClinicalTrials.gov, FlyBase, Figshare, and Dryad that accept different types of data. The document emphasizes documenting data thoroughly with metadata and standards and following ethical guidelines for sharing and preserving data in the long term.
The data journal: incentivizing open scholarship or 'a convenient fiction'?Brian Hole
The document discusses the role of data journals and data papers in incentivizing open scholarship. It notes that scientific practice involves validation, dissemination and further development of research, but that currently publishers, researchers and repositories are not fulfilling these obligations with respect to data. Data journals and data papers can help by providing incentives for researchers to publish and cite data, similarly to how conventional papers and citations currently work. This would help formalize data sharing as part of the normal scholarly process.
Sustainable, Successful Open Data PublicationBrian Hole
Slides from a presentation given by Brian Hole from Ubiquity Press at the 9th International Digital Curation Conference, San Francisco, February 25 2014.
The Journal of Open Archaeology Data and PRIME: Incentivising Open Data Archi...Brian Hole
An introduction to the Journal of Open Archaeology Data (JOAD) and the Publisher, Repository and Institutional Metadata Exchange (PRIME) project, by Brian Hole. Presentation given at the 7th World Archaeological Congress (WAC 7), at the Dead Sea, Jordan, in 18 January 2013.
This document outlines plans for establishing a new open access data journal called the Journal of Open Economics Data. It discusses the need for data papers that describe datasets in sufficient detail to allow for their reuse and validation. The document proposes a general structure for data papers and outlines requirements for peer review, including review of the deposited dataset and its documentation. It also discusses setting up the journal's editorial board and advisory board and recruiting authors, data reviewers, and repository partners. The goal is for the new journal to help advance open data practices and incentivize data sharing within economic research communities.
The document discusses the shift towards open access publishing. It provides background on open access, describing it as content that is freely available online without financial, legal or technical barriers. The document outlines the history of open access, from early online journals in the 1990s to major developments like arXiv, PubMed Central, and the launch of open access publishers like BioMed Central and PLOS. It describes the open access business model of article processing charges and discusses new models from organizations like eLife, PeerJ, and Ubiquity Press. Finally, it addresses the current climate driving the shift towards open access, including funder policies in the UK, US and EU supporting greater public access to taxpayer-funded research.
An short introduction to the PRIME (Publisher, Repository and Institutional Metadata Exchange) project, by Brian Hole, at the JISC Managing Research Data programme launch workshop in Nottingham, UK, October 25th 2012.
Talk given at the “Shareable by Design: Making research data available for access” workshop, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, November 12 2014
Open Access is Just the Beginning: Disrupting PublishingBrian Hole
Ubiquity Press is a researcher-led open access publishing company founded in 2012 that aims to give control of publishing back to universities and researchers. It provides infrastructure and support to allow societies and universities to compete with large legacy publishers. Ubiquity Press takes a comprehensive approach to publishing, offering journals, books, data, software, and more. It is committed to research integrity and has measures like plagiarism checking, rigorous peer review, and support for open data and software archiving. The company also has an inclusive partnership model to help publishing partners in developing countries become independently sustainable over time.
The Ubiquity Partner Network: Global Support for PublishingBrian Hole
This document summarizes a presentation given by Brian Hole, the founder and CEO of Ubiquity Press. Ubiquity Press provides publishing infrastructure and support to help universities and researchers regain control over publishing and outcompete legacy publishers. It aims to support the full scholarly communications process, including journals, books, data, software, and hardware. Ubiquity Press also focuses on research integrity, peer review, and building an inclusive partnership model to support open access publishing worldwide.
Disrupting Academic Publishing: Returning Control to UniversitiesBrian Hole
Ubiquity Press was founded in 2012 to give universities and researchers control over publishing by providing infrastructure and support to publish open access journals and books. They aim to outcompete legacy publishers by lowering article publication fees from an average of £2,000 to more affordable rates. Ubiquity Press works with over 50 academic societies and university presses to transition their publishing programs to open access using Ubiquity Press' publishing platform and services.
The document discusses the shift to open access publishing. It provides an overview of Ubiquity Press, which publishes open access. It then discusses the history and models of open access publishing, including gold and green open access. Government policies increasingly mandate open access for publicly funded research. While large publishers initially opposed open access mandates, researcher support for open access has grown.
The PRIME project developed a system to exchange metadata between an institutional repository, subject repository, and data journal focused on archaeology. It used a subset of the DataCite schema and allowed for automatic metadata exchange as researchers deposited data in different repositories and journals. The project aimed to incentivize open data sharing and help repositories and journals work together through coordinated metadata. It completed several use cases, including a researcher depositing data in a subject repository, institutional repository, and data journal to test the automatic exchange.
Ubiquity Press is a researcher-led open access publishing company. Their presentation discusses why researchers should publish open data, how to publish data through data journals and repositories that integrate with publishers, and some cases where open data is not possible, such as when consent or confidentiality is a issue. Ubiquity Press provides services to publish a wide range of research outputs openly through their platform while balancing openness with these exceptions.
The Ubiquity Partner Network: Enabling Library-Based PublishingBrian Hole
This document summarizes a presentation given by Brian Hole, the founder and CEO of Ubiquity Press, about their company and the Ubiquity Partner Network. Ubiquity Press was founded in 2012 to give control of publishing back to universities and researchers by providing infrastructure and support to publish journals, books, and other research outputs. Their mission is to help partners outcompete legacy publishers through an open access model and comprehensive services while ensuring research integrity. They have established a partner network and plugins to enable library-based publishing through collaboration.
Open Access eBooks andScholarly PublishingBrian Hole
The document discusses open access eBooks and scholarly publishing. It notes that many scholarly monographs are overpriced and poorly distributed, while open access eBooks could help research libraries save money through a single eBook copy being usable by multiple students. Open access publishing of eBooks has yet to fully benefit disciplines like the humanities where half of scholarly output is in book form. The document advocates for collaboration between university presses to benefit from combined expertise and economies of scale. It presents Ubiquity Press's business model of low chapter processing charges and integration with research council funding as an example of fulfilling the social contract of open dissemination of scholarly work.
Overcoming Obstacles to Sharing Research DataBrian Hole
Ubiquity Press was spun out of University College London in 2012 with the mission to return control of publishing to university and society presses. The company is researcher-led with founders having extensive experience in academic publishing. Ubiquity Press takes a comprehensive approach to publishing, including journals, books, data, software and more, with the goal of advancing publishing in the interests of researchers.
The document discusses best practices for preparing data for open publication. It recommends thinking openly and planning early by creating detailed data management plans. It provides examples of repositories like GenBank, ClinicalTrials.gov, FlyBase, Figshare, and Dryad that accept different types of data. The document emphasizes documenting data thoroughly with metadata and standards and following ethical guidelines for sharing and preserving data in the long term.
The data journal: incentivizing open scholarship or 'a convenient fiction'?Brian Hole
The document discusses the role of data journals and data papers in incentivizing open scholarship. It notes that scientific practice involves validation, dissemination and further development of research, but that currently publishers, researchers and repositories are not fulfilling these obligations with respect to data. Data journals and data papers can help by providing incentives for researchers to publish and cite data, similarly to how conventional papers and citations currently work. This would help formalize data sharing as part of the normal scholarly process.
Sustainable, Successful Open Data PublicationBrian Hole
Slides from a presentation given by Brian Hole from Ubiquity Press at the 9th International Digital Curation Conference, San Francisco, February 25 2014.
The Journal of Open Archaeology Data and PRIME: Incentivising Open Data Archi...Brian Hole
An introduction to the Journal of Open Archaeology Data (JOAD) and the Publisher, Repository and Institutional Metadata Exchange (PRIME) project, by Brian Hole. Presentation given at the 7th World Archaeological Congress (WAC 7), at the Dead Sea, Jordan, in 18 January 2013.
This document outlines plans for establishing a new open access data journal called the Journal of Open Economics Data. It discusses the need for data papers that describe datasets in sufficient detail to allow for their reuse and validation. The document proposes a general structure for data papers and outlines requirements for peer review, including review of the deposited dataset and its documentation. It also discusses setting up the journal's editorial board and advisory board and recruiting authors, data reviewers, and repository partners. The goal is for the new journal to help advance open data practices and incentivize data sharing within economic research communities.
The document discusses the shift towards open access publishing. It provides background on open access, describing it as content that is freely available online without financial, legal or technical barriers. The document outlines the history of open access, from early online journals in the 1990s to major developments like arXiv, PubMed Central, and the launch of open access publishers like BioMed Central and PLOS. It describes the open access business model of article processing charges and discusses new models from organizations like eLife, PeerJ, and Ubiquity Press. Finally, it addresses the current climate driving the shift towards open access, including funder policies in the UK, US and EU supporting greater public access to taxpayer-funded research.
An short introduction to the PRIME (Publisher, Repository and Institutional Metadata Exchange) project, by Brian Hole, at the JISC Managing Research Data programme launch workshop in Nottingham, UK, October 25th 2012.
The document discusses two possible futures for open access (OA) publishing - maintaining the status quo or the research community taking more control. Currently, OA is growing but on the terms of large legacy publishers, who lobby against OA mandates and charge high article processing charges (APCs). However, many research initiatives are working to construct an alternative, cooperative OA future that is more global, cost-effective, and unrestricted. The Ubiquity Partner Network (UPN) pulls together various OA initiatives to increase the chances of large-scale disruption away from the legacy publisher model.
Open access for the inaugural @OpenResLDN meeting 2015 01 19Chris Banks
Slides that I will speak to at the inaugural meeting of OpenResLDN on 19th January 2015. January 2015 sees the 350th anniversary of the first ever journal publication - the Journal des Savants. We are now in the 21st year of the Open Access movement and the UK and European policies are really beginning to drive change and innovation. That change is not fast enough for some, and for others - particularly those covered by the policies, or seeking to implement policy - just a little too fast sometimes.
The document discusses challenges facing open access in academia. It notes successes of open access and open source movements like Wikipedia and open data initiatives. However, it outlines ongoing issues like commercial publishers' control over legacy content and lobbying against open policies. Solutions proposed include fully open licensing models and drawing from examples of open communities in some disciplines.
Making Open the Default in Scholarly Communication, and the Implications for ...SPARC Europe
This document summarizes a presentation about making open access the default in scholarly communication and implications for libraries. The key points are:
1) Open access promises to remove barriers to access, reduce costs, and increase research impact, but is not yet the norm due to obstacles like assessment systems rewarding prestige publications and a culture that does not incentivize open practices.
2) Libraries can help by advocating for policy changes, educating researchers, and reallocating resources from licensing to supporting open infrastructure and services.
3) Significant changes are needed as the system transitions to open access as the default, including collaboration between libraries and reallocation of resources, in order to ensure libraries remain relevant in the future scholarly ecosystem
The Growing Role of Libraries in PublishingBrian Hole
The document discusses the growing role of libraries in scholarly publishing. It notes that libraries are taking on publishing roles like journal and book publishing, research data management, and supporting open access initiatives. Some key drivers for this include supporting open science and access to research outputs. Libraries are well positioned for publishing as they provide non-profit and researcher-driven alternatives to traditional publishers. Examples are provided of libraries running full university presses or partnering with independent publishers like Ubiquity Press.
A Presentation made to Liber Europe's 'The Use and Generation of Scientific Content – Roles for Libraries' in Budapest, Hungary Sept 12th, 2016 by Lars Bjørnshauge.
In this presentation, Lars calls into question the use and success of Green Open Access, reminds us of the key role of librarians in the success of open access and calls on governments to support Gold Open Access.
OAPEN-UK at Open Access Week 2013 - Dundee UniversityOAPENUK
The document discusses open access monographs and the OAPEN-UK project. OAPEN-UK is exploring how to transition monographs to open access by researching stakeholder attitudes, tracking the effects of open access publishing, and identifying changes needed to policies and workflows. The project involves surveys, focus groups, case studies and a pilot program to evaluate open access monograph publishing. Overall, OAPEN-UK aims to promote understanding of open access monographs and enable stakeholders to make informed decisions based on evidence from the research.
‘Emerging from the chrysalis – transforming libraries for the future’ - Danny...CONUL Conference
The document summarizes the transformation of scholarly communication from traditional print-based publishing to the modern digital era. It describes how the internet disrupted the established system of scientific publishing by enabling new open access models. While publishers initially adapted by taking their journals online, they have increasingly expanded their businesses and influence over the scholarly ecosystem. Libraries now play a changing role and must collaborate more closely with researchers to support new forms of scholarship. However, change remains slow at older universities like Cambridge due to their complex governance systems and academic culture that values independence.
A presentation, made by Lars to the Asian Council of Science Editors, on the problems facing academic publishing and what DOAJ is doing to push a change towards greater openness
Dr Alma Swan, "Is Open Acess just another fad?"UQSCADS
This document summarizes a presentation on open access given at the University of Queensland. It discusses how open access provides immediate, free access to peer-reviewed research and data. Open access benefits authors through increased visibility, usage, impact, and personal profiling of their work. It also benefits universities by improving research monitoring and demonstrating societal return. Open access is not a fad as funder and institutional policies are increasingly requiring it.
This document discusses understanding knowledge as a commons from theory to practice. It explores conceptualizing knowledge as a commons using frameworks like the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. It also discusses protecting knowledge commons through open access and governance while incentivizing participation. Creating new knowledge commons involves exploring business models and the role of research libraries in stewarding knowledge as a public good.
Nicole Nogoy at the G3 Workshop: Open Access Publishing - What you need to KnowGigaScience, BGI Hong Kong
This document discusses open access publishing and some of the key challenges. It notes that while open access publishing removes barriers to accessing and sharing scientific research, major publishers currently control the market and charge high subscription fees. This puts strain on library budgets. The document outlines initiatives to increase open access, such as university and funder mandates, and notes that open access journals can have high impact. However, challenges remain around copyright and the ability to fully text mine and reuse content. More advocacy and support for open access is needed to address these issues.
This document summarizes Dr. Frances Pinter's experiences promoting open access for scholarly monographs. It discusses various open access business models and initiatives, challenges around metadata and discoverability, and calls for stakeholders to work together on sustainable and cost-effective open access processes. Key points include Bloomsbury Academic's early adoption of open access, Knowledge Unlatched's crowdfunding model, and the importance of Central European University Press's mission. The document advocates for improving metadata standards, tracking usage data, and integrating open access monographs into libraries.
Research notes in the form of a deck of slides assembled by Ernesto Priego for the Open Access debate organised by Roger Sabin at Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts, London, Monday 18 March 2013. Also available via Figshare as Open Access Now! Research notes in the form of a deck of slides assembled by Ernesto Priego for the Open Access debate organised by Roger Sabin at Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts, London, Monday 18 March 2013. . Ernesto Priego. figshare.
http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.654622
Advocating Open Access: Before, during and after HEFCENick Sheppard
Since “self-archiving” of research outputs was first mooted in the mid-1990s, initiatives towards “green” Open Access (OA) across the sector have met with generally limited success and coverage in institutional and subject repositories is generally cited at around 20-30%. However, since the Finch report in 2012 combined with OA policies from RCUK, also in 2012, and HEFCE the following year, there is little doubt that a tipping point of awareness has been reached. This session will aim to contextualise the HEFCE policy in the broader history of Open Access and present a case study of a non-research intensive University and how the repository manager has sought to liaise with academic support services in order to facilitate knowledge exchange across the University. - See more at: http://www.cilip.org.uk/events/open-access-advocacy#sthash.9YqReHt0.dpuf
The changing landscape of scholarly communication: presentation to the NFAIS ...Keith Webster
Presentation on the changing relationships between research libraries, publishers, researchers and technology, and the impact of government policy on scholarly publishing and open access.
Scholarly communication refers to how academics find information, create knowledge, and share it with students and beyond academia. Traditionally, scholars would meet and correspond privately, but scholarly journals emerged as correspondence increased. Problems with the current system include commercial publishers controlling access and pricing out readers. Open Access aims to make scholarly works free online, either by publishing in an Open Access journal or self-archiving in an institutional repository. There are advocacy policies and mandates growing for Open Access worldwide to benefit research dissemination and public access to taxpayer-funded work.
Similar to Open Access: Advantages, Funding, Opportunities (20)
Ubiquity Press is a for-profit publisher that aims to achieve open scholarship by providing infrastructure and support to universities and researchers. It was founded in 2012 and has published over 590 journals, 260 books, and partners with 30 presses. As a for-profit company, it seeks to be commercially viable without external funding and able to attract investment for growth and compete with large publishers. However, it remains unconditionally open through 100% open access and open source publishing, transparent pricing, and no contractual lock-ins.
Ubiquity Press is a scholarly publisher that aims to achieve open scholarship by providing infrastructure and support to universities, libraries, and researchers. It was spun out of University College London in 2012 and has a mission to revolutionize open publishing by returning control to the academic community. Ubiquity Press advocates for fully open access and open source approaches across the entire research cycle, from data management plans and protocols to published results. It has launched several open access journals and works to support open sharing of research outputs like data, software, and preprints. Ubiquity Press also discusses recent policies pushing for open scholarship and the potential benefits of open approaches to accelerate scientific progress.
Ubiquity Press was spun out of UCL in 2012 as a researcher-led, privately owned, for-profit open access publisher. It uses an open source platform and operates under an open access, open source model without exclusive bundling or contract lock-ins. It has over 30 partner presses and libraries and is community driven with institutional customers and a steering board.
Open Scholarship: more important than ever. OA week 2018Brian Hole
Overview of the Ubiquity Press approach to Open Access and Open Scholarship for Open Access Week 2018. Presentation given at the Levy Library at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, October 24th 2018.
Developments in Researcher-led, Open Access PublishingBrian Hole
The document discusses developments in open access publishing by Ubiquity Press. It provides an overview of Ubiquity Press, including its mission to provide researcher-led publishing infrastructure. It outlines Ubiquity Press' offerings like journals, books, and conferences. It also summarizes current trends in open access like the focus on repositories and metrics, as well as the future of open access publishing involving machine readability and broadening access.
Ubiquity Press is an open access academic publishing company that was founded in 2008. It works with partner university presses and libraries to publish journals, books and other scholarly works. The document outlines the growth of Ubiquity Press' partner network and publications from 2008-2016, noting that while it has experienced significant growth, it still considers itself a startup with potential for further expansion.
Revolution by 1000 cuts: University Presses are the Future of PublishingBrian Hole
The document discusses how university presses are the future of publishing. It argues that university presses are more effective than legacy publishers because they are closer to researchers, more innovative, and tied to the goals of libraries and universities. It also notes that the future of publishing will be more than just books and journals, and will involve open science, communication in all forms, and collaboration without restrictions. The document asks how this future can be constructed and suggests that it will involve book and journal publishing through transparent pricing models like book processing charges and article processing charges to make publishing fully sustainable.
Publishing for a truly global research communityBrian Hole
The document is an email from Brian Hole, the founder and CEO of Ubiquity Press, discussing their mission of publishing for a global research community. It provides Ubiquity Press's contact information and links to sources about the growing global population and challenges of open access publishing. The email signs off by inviting the recipient to contact Brian Hole with any questions.
Brian Hole, founder and CEO of Ubiquity Press, gave a presentation on open access publishing at EIFL workshops in Palestine in December 2015. He discussed the basics of open access, including its importance for validating and disseminating research as well as allowing further development. Hole also addressed common concerns around open access, such as article processing charges, and alternative models that do not involve fees. He highlighted opportunities for training, conferences, and international collaborations that could benefit students and researchers.
Brian Hole, founder and CEO of Ubiquity Press, discusses disrupting academic publishing through open access publishing. He outlines issues with the current system such as a lack of transparency. Ubiquity Press provides gold open access publishing with article processing charges of £300 while maintaining rigorous peer review and research integrity standards. Their model is supported by over 140 libraries worldwide.
Brian Hole, founder and CEO of Ubiquity Press, gave a presentation on disrupting academic publishing at the UKSG Forum in London. He discussed how the social contract of science includes validation, dissemination and further development of research, but that scientific malpractice can occur through issues with data, results, software and hardware. Hole also presented on Ubiquity Press's model of transparency and trust in academic publishing with article processing charges of £300.
Innovation in Open Access Monographs, Archives and JournalsBrian Hole
The document provides contact information for Ubiquity Press, including an email address, website, and Twitter handle. It also lists the article processing charges of £300 or $450 to publish articles with the company. The document repeats this information over multiple lines.
Emerging models in digital scholarship, research, publication and open scienceBrian Hole
The document discusses emerging models in digital scholarship, research, publication, and open science. It addresses the social contract of science including validation, dissemination, and further development. It also mentions scientific malpractice related to data, results, software, and hardware. Finally, it discusses peer review, cascading content, and teamwork.
Open Science: A New Publisher PerspectiveBrian Hole
The document discusses the publisher Ubiquity Press's perspective on open science. It advocates publishing everything, for everyone, everywhere, and in every way. This includes validating, disseminating, and further developing all research outputs, such as data, results, software, and hardware. It also discusses making scientific works more machine readable through standard formats to enable text mining and linking articles to related research. The overall goal is open sharing of all research outputs.
Data Citation: A Critical Role for PublishersBrian Hole
The document discusses the critical role publishers play in data citation. It emphasizes the importance of publishers establishing clear guidelines for citing data, training copy editors to ensure data is properly cited, promoting the use of data papers to incentivize data sharing and reuse, and making data citations machine-readable through XML tagging or RDF to facilitate discovery and analysis of cited data.
Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and MilvusZilliz
During this demo, the founders of Secludy will demonstrate how their system utilizes Milvus to store and manipulate embeddings for generating privacy-protected synthetic data. Their approach not only maintains the confidentiality of the original data but also enhances the utility and scalability of LLMs under privacy constraints. Attendees, including machine learning engineers, data scientists, and data managers, will witness first-hand how Secludy's integration with Milvus empowers organizations to harness the power of LLMs securely and efficiently.
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial IntelligenceIndexBug
Imagine a world where machines not only perform tasks but also learn, adapt, and make decisions. This is the promise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a technology that's not just enhancing our lives but revolutionizing entire industries.
OpenID AuthZEN Interop Read Out - AuthorizationDavid Brossard
During Identiverse 2024 and EIC 2024, members of the OpenID AuthZEN WG got together and demoed their authorization endpoints conforming to the AuthZEN API
Best 20 SEO Techniques To Improve Website Visibility In SERPPixlogix Infotech
Boost your website's visibility with proven SEO techniques! Our latest blog dives into essential strategies to enhance your online presence, increase traffic, and rank higher on search engines. From keyword optimization to quality content creation, learn how to make your site stand out in the crowded digital landscape. Discover actionable tips and expert insights to elevate your SEO game.
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slackshyamraj55
Discover the seamless integration of RPA (Robotic Process Automation), COMPOSER, and APM with AWS IDP enhanced with Slack notifications. Explore how these technologies converge to streamline workflows, optimize performance, and ensure secure access, all while leveraging the power of AWS IDP and real-time communication via Slack notifications.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup SlidesZilliz
Prompting language models is hard, while programming language models is easy. In this talk, I will discuss the state-of-the-art framework DSPy for programming foundation models with its powerful optimizers and runtime constraint system.
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providersakankshawande
Simplify your search for a reliable Python development partner! This list presents the top 10 trusted US providers offering comprehensive Python development services, ensuring your project's success from conception to completion.
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?Speck&Tech
ABSTRACT: A prima vista, un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ potrebbero avere in comune il fatto di essere entrambi blocchi di costruzione, o dipendenze di progetti creativi e software. La realtà è che un mattoncino Lego e il caso della backdoor XZ hanno molto di più di tutto ciò in comune.
Partecipate alla presentazione per immergervi in una storia di interoperabilità, standard e formati aperti, per poi discutere del ruolo importante che i contributori hanno in una comunità open source sostenibile.
BIO: Sostenitrice del software libero e dei formati standard e aperti. È stata un membro attivo dei progetti Fedora e openSUSE e ha co-fondato l'Associazione LibreItalia dove è stata coinvolta in diversi eventi, migrazioni e formazione relativi a LibreOffice. In precedenza ha lavorato a migrazioni e corsi di formazione su LibreOffice per diverse amministrazioni pubbliche e privati. Da gennaio 2020 lavora in SUSE come Software Release Engineer per Uyuni e SUSE Manager e quando non segue la sua passione per i computer e per Geeko coltiva la sua curiosità per l'astronomia (da cui deriva il suo nickname deneb_alpha).
Have you ever been confused by the myriad of choices offered by AWS for hosting a website or an API?
Lambda, Elastic Beanstalk, Lightsail, Amplify, S3 (and more!) can each host websites + APIs. But which one should we choose?
Which one is cheapest? Which one is fastest? Which one will scale to meet our needs?
Join me in this session as we dive into each AWS hosting service to determine which one is best for your scenario and explain why!
Monitoring and Managing Anomaly Detection on OpenShift.pdfTosin Akinosho
Monitoring and Managing Anomaly Detection on OpenShift
Overview
Dive into the world of anomaly detection on edge devices with our comprehensive hands-on tutorial. This SlideShare presentation will guide you through the entire process, from data collection and model training to edge deployment and real-time monitoring. Perfect for those looking to implement robust anomaly detection systems on resource-constrained IoT/edge devices.
Key Topics Covered
1. Introduction to Anomaly Detection
- Understand the fundamentals of anomaly detection and its importance in identifying unusual behavior or failures in systems.
2. Understanding Edge (IoT)
- Learn about edge computing and IoT, and how they enable real-time data processing and decision-making at the source.
3. What is ArgoCD?
- Discover ArgoCD, a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes, and its role in deploying applications on edge devices.
4. Deployment Using ArgoCD for Edge Devices
- Step-by-step guide on deploying anomaly detection models on edge devices using ArgoCD.
5. Introduction to Apache Kafka and S3
- Explore Apache Kafka for real-time data streaming and Amazon S3 for scalable storage solutions.
6. Viewing Kafka Messages in the Data Lake
- Learn how to view and analyze Kafka messages stored in a data lake for better insights.
7. What is Prometheus?
- Get to know Prometheus, an open-source monitoring and alerting toolkit, and its application in monitoring edge devices.
8. Monitoring Application Metrics with Prometheus
- Detailed instructions on setting up Prometheus to monitor the performance and health of your anomaly detection system.
9. What is Camel K?
- Introduction to Camel K, a lightweight integration framework built on Apache Camel, designed for Kubernetes.
10. Configuring Camel K Integrations for Data Pipelines
- Learn how to configure Camel K for seamless data pipeline integrations in your anomaly detection workflow.
11. What is a Jupyter Notebook?
- Overview of Jupyter Notebooks, an open-source web application for creating and sharing documents with live code, equations, visualizations, and narrative text.
12. Jupyter Notebooks with Code Examples
- Hands-on examples and code snippets in Jupyter Notebooks to help you implement and test anomaly detection models.
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAUpanagenda
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-and-domino-license-cost-reduction-in-the-world-of-dlau/
The introduction of DLAU and the CCB & CCX licensing model caused quite a stir in the HCL community. As a Notes and Domino customer, you may have faced challenges with unexpected user counts and license costs. You probably have questions on how this new licensing approach works and how to benefit from it. Most importantly, you likely have budget constraints and want to save money where possible. Don’t worry, we can help with all of this!
We’ll show you how to fix common misconfigurations that cause higher-than-expected user counts, and how to identify accounts which you can deactivate to save money. There are also frequent patterns that can cause unnecessary cost, like using a person document instead of a mail-in for shared mailboxes. We’ll provide examples and solutions for those as well. And naturally we’ll explain the new licensing model.
Join HCL Ambassador Marc Thomas in this webinar with a special guest appearance from Franz Walder. It will give you the tools and know-how to stay on top of what is going on with Domino licensing. You will be able lower your cost through an optimized configuration and keep it low going forward.
These topics will be covered
- Reducing license cost by finding and fixing misconfigurations and superfluous accounts
- How do CCB and CCX licenses really work?
- Understanding the DLAU tool and how to best utilize it
- Tips for common problem areas, like team mailboxes, functional/test users, etc
- Practical examples and best practices to implement right away
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoptionTatiana Kojar
Manage and optimize your license adoption and consumption with SAM4U, an SAP free customer software asset management tool.
SAM4U, an SAP complimentary software asset management tool for customers, delivers a detailed and well-structured overview of license inventory and usage with a user-friendly interface. We offer a hosted, cost-effective, and performance-optimized SAM4U setup in the Skybuffer Cloud environment. You retain ownership of the system and data, while we manage the ABAP 7.58 infrastructure, ensuring fixed Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and exceptional services through the SAP Fiori interface.
Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdfssuserfac0301
Read Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing to gain insights on AI adoption in the manufacturing industry, such as:
1. How quickly AI is being implemented in manufacturing.
2. Which barriers stand in the way of AI adoption.
3. How data quality and governance form the backbone of AI.
4. Organizational processes and structures that may inhibit effective AI adoption.
6. Ideas and approaches to help build your organization's AI strategy.
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)Jakub Marek
An English 🇬🇧 translation of a presentation to the speech I gave about the main changes brought by CCS TSI 2023 at the biggest Czech conference on Communications and signalling systems on Railways, which was held in Clarion Hotel Olomouc from 7th to 9th November 2023 (konferenceszt.cz). Attended by around 500 participants and 200 on-line followers.
The original Czech 🇨🇿 version of the presentation can be found here: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/hlavni-novinky-souvisejici-s-ccs-tsi-2023-2023-1695/269688092 .
The videorecording (in Czech) from the presentation is available here: https://youtu.be/WzjJWm4IyPk?si=SImb06tuXGb30BEH .
7. Advantages of Open Access
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
8. The Social Contract
of Science
• Research requires an
effective, efficient
distribution model
• Research funders are now
demanding this – it will
become the main model
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
9. • Governments fund
universities to do research.
• They then fund each
Stats on UK research vs. library university library to buy
spending?
Research Bought, Then Paid For back the published results of
By MICHAEL B. EISEN that work.
January 10, 2012
• These research results
“Congress should move to enshrine a simple are only available to those
principle in United States law: if taxpayers paid for
it, they own it.”
universities (not to the
public sector etc.)
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
10. RCUK announces new Open Access policy
16 July 2012
The new policy, which will apply to all qualifying publications
being submitted for publication from 1 April 2013, states that
peer reviewed research papers which result from research that is
wholly or partially funded by the Research Councils:
• must be published in journals which are compliant with
Research Council policy on Open Access
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
11. Wellcome Trust will penalise
scientists who don't embrace open access
Wealthy medical charity says it will withhold researchers'
final grant payments if they fail to make their results open access
The Guardian, Thursday 28 June 2012
The Wellcome Trust plans to withhold a portion of grant money from scientists who do not make
the results of their work freely available to the public... In addition, any research papers that are
not freely available will not be counted as part of a scientist's track record when Wellcome
assesses any future applications for research funding.
The trust is the second largest medical research charity in the world, spending more than £600m
on science every year. Its director, Sir Mark Walport, has said that publishing research papers
should be considered a cost of a research project in the same way as a piece of lab equipment.
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
12. • Coordinated moves
“[Open Access… ] is essential for
towards OA mandate
Europe's ability to enhance its policies in EU
economic performance and improve • Large publishers are very
its capacity to compete through
knowledge. Open Access can also
international
boost the visibility of European and lobby actively
research, and in particular offer small • Recent example of the
and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
access to the latest research for
Research Works Act
exploitation.”
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
13. Research Works Act (H.R. 3699)
• Contained provisions to prohibit
open-access mandates for
federally funded research
• Congress members who
introduced the act ‘motivated by
large donations by the academic
publisher X’
• Massive international outcry,
especially from researchers
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
15. Amid boycott, X backtracks on research bill
Journal publisher still opposes current U.S. rules mandating access to taxpayer-
funded research
CBC News
Posted: Feb 27, 2012
One of the largest academic publishers in the world withdrew its support Monday
from a controversial U.S. bill, the Research Works Act, that critics feel would restrict
public access to published, publicly-funded research.
The change of heart by Dutch publisher X follows a boycott of its journals and
publishing ventures by thousands of researchers around the world.
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
16. Disadvantages?
• Better solutions need to be found for the
developing world
• Partnerships, funding
• Mobile access
• epesa
• Perceptions of low quality due to unethical
practices
• OASPA and COPE membership
• Many publishers are out of touch with
researchers and funders and have lost trust
• Focus is too much on sales, rather than the
product that researchers want most
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
19. Article Processing Charges (APCs)
• Need to be fair and transparent
• I.e. charge for actual work done, base on
number of pages etc.
• Can be based on number of pages etc.
• Waivers must be given
• Lack of legacy publishing costs means prices
need not be high
• APCs for UP journals:
• Research journals: 0 - £200
• Metajournals: £25
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
20. Print on Demand
• Dramatically lowers publisher costs
• No need for large print runs, stock,
distribution
• Greater flexibility
• Issues:
• Lack of distribution in developing
world still
• Perceptions of poor quality due to
quick and dirty approaches
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
21. Collaborations and partnerships
• University presses are essential for the
future of academic publishing
• They represent the needs of researchers and
institutions directly, and can adopt OA more
quickly than many big publisher will
• Presses can share resources for efficiency
• Subject expertise
• Technical capability
• UP examples
• Journals: University of Nairobi Press
• Books: Norvik Press, UCL Arts
& Humanities, European Collaboration
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
23. OA eBooks
• Many disciplines (e.g. Humanities) are yet to
fully benefit from electronic OA publishing
because half of their output is in book form
• Many scholarly monographs are overpriced
and poorly distributed
• “At this price, people will only read the
reviews”
• Research libraries are increasingly looking to
save money
• One e copy for multiple students
• No shelf space requirements
• No lending administration overhead
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
25. Metajournals
• Highlight research outputs
that would otherwise be
isolated in ‘silos’
• Flexible: different types of
resources and repositories
• Peer reviewed
• Ensure best practice
followed
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
26. Metajournals
• Use familiar methods – low
barrier to participation
• Focus on high-reuse
potential
• Incentivise openness
• Reward researchers who
may otherwise go
unrecognised
• www.metajnl.com
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
27. Peer review
1. The paper contents
a. The methods section of the paper must provide
sufficient detail that a reader can understand how
the resource was created.
b. The resource must be correctly described.
c. The reuse section must provide concrete and useful
suggestions for reuse of the reuse.
2. The deposited resource
a. The repository must be suitable for resource
and have a sustainability model.
b. Open license permits unrestricted access (e.g. CC0).
c. A version in an open, non-proprietary format.
d. Labeled in such a way that a 3rd party can make
sense of it.
e. Must be actionable.
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
28. Data journals
• Data is already citable (e.g.
with DataCite DOIs) but this is
not something researchers
are familiar with doing.
• Even when used, DataCite
DOIs cannot currently be used
for citation tracking.
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
29. What is a data paper?
A data paper…
• … describes the methodology with which
a dataset was created.
• … describes the dataset itself.
• … details the reuse potential of the data.
• … is often authored by a data scientist.
• … is citable, enabling reuse to be tracked.
A data paper is not…
• … a research paper. A data paper only
describes a dataset. But it will reference
research papers that are based on the data.
• … simply replication of the information in a
data repository.
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
31. Software journals
• Software is an important research
output that is not currently
tracked for impact. Yet for some
researchers, it is their biggest
output.
• Essentially the same as a data
journal except:
• Use of code as well as
preservations repositories
• Reusability metrics
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress