The document outlines criteria for evaluating an online program for a large high school. It discusses the need for an online option due to lack of classroom space and students enrolling in other online schools. The evaluation will use a 4 point system to rate the program's technology, clear expectations, relevant content, assessment practices, student collaboration, and teacher evaluation. All stakeholders will have an opportunity to provide feedback.

1. Online Program Evaluation
LAURA BEDNAR

2. School Setting
 Large high school
consisting of 3,200
students
 Running out of
classroom space, online
course could be cost
effective alternative
 Audience- high school
students

3. Why Online?
 Students are starting to
enroll in other Cyber
Schools
 Having a Parkland
School District Cyber
School allows for
Parkland Diploma
 Bonus, tax dollars stay
within District

4. Online Program Evaluation Criteria
 Technology/Program Overview
 Clear course expectations
 Relevant course content
 Identify Clear, Measureable and Developmental Student
Learning
 Evaluate Assessment Practices
 Student Collaboration and Feedback
 Teacher Evaluation

5. Evaluation Criteria
 A 4 point system will be used to evaluate the online
program
 1- little information, does not meet expectations
 2- some information, barely meets expectations
 3- information is present, meet expectations
 4- information is present and clear, goes above expectations

6. Who Evaluates Program?
 All stakeholders will have
a chance to evaluate
program
 Teacher
 Students
 Parents
 Administrators

7. Technology/Program Overview
 Help is clearly listed and available for all students
 Technology tutorial is provided
 Course/program tutorial is provided
 Technology/Program expectations are clearly listed

8. Course Expectations
 Course syllabus is easy to find and understand
 Expectations of students are clearly written
 Course content and assignments are clearly listed
 Course is divided into easy to understand
sections/modules
 Rubrics are provided for all assignments
 Professor contact information is easy to find

9. Relevant course content
 Modules/course sections present course content in
variety of ways to meet various teaching styles
 Each unit has clear learning objectives
 All resources enhance the learning process
 All resources are directly linked to learning
objectives

10. Evaluate Assessment Practices
 Assessments were aligned with learning objectives
 A variety of assessments were used to meet the needs
of all learners
 Clear rubrics were found for every assessment
 Assessments are reliable and valid

11. Student Collaboration and Feedback
 Students are expected to maintain professional
discussions
 Students will communicate effectively with group
members
 Students will provide feedback to teacher about
course

12. Teacher Evaluation
 Teacher will provide meaningful/timely feedback
after every assessment
 Teacher will encourage effective student discussions
and participation
 Teacher will evaluate course content once students
have progressed and reviewed student feedback