The document presents a project by Mohd Rafie Kamaruzaman on extending Numerical Situation Analysis (NSA) into maintenance areas, including the development of situational maps and the SWOT matrix analysis for strategic decision making. It updates on various methodologies including strategy selection processes, mapping factors like cost and productivity, and implementation of 2D/3D visual aids for analysis. The project aims for further research and real data collection to enhance decision-making tools in maintenance practices.

1. NSA (Use In Maintenance) Presented by Mohd Rafie KAMARUZAMAN Final Year Student of Mechanical Engineering (BEng) Hons Cardiff University [email_address] http://mohdrafie.co.uk/nsa

2. Synopsis Project Overview Project Updates Conclusions Q&A Session

3. Project Overview What is Numerical Situation Analysis (NSA)? Previous Work Strategy Selection via NSA by A. Davies & E.G. John (Cardiff University) SWOT Analysis together with weighted factor assessment proposed by Wheelan & Hunger (1995) Luck’s Method (1956) SWOT Analysis (1960s)

4. NSA Strategic decision making process assistance

5. Project Objective Extend the NSA into the maintenance area . Further exploit the Luck’s Method factors: Cost Planning Productivity Workload Implement Situation Map in 2D/3D as a visual aid in decision making.

6. Project Update Developed the flow chart of strategy selection process for NSA. Introduction of four (4) Situation Map for different strategy selection. Introduction of future matrix for continuous development for the maintenance area.

7. Determine factors and weighing Mapping current position on Situational Map SWOT Matrix Analysis Deduce relevant factors and choosing the appropriate Situational Map Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4

8. Step 1: Determine the factor and weighing Cost Planning Productivity Workload 1 0.6 C4 3 0.9 C3 2 0.8 C2 0 0.5 C1 RFV FAV Prefix 3 0.9 PL4 1 0.6 PL3 0 0.5 PL2 2 0.7 PL1 RFV FAV Prefix 0 0.4 PR4 3 0.8 PR3 2 0.6 PR2 1 0.5 PR1 RFV FAV Prefix 2 0.5 W4 0 0.2 W3 1 0.4 W2 3 0.7 W1 RFV FAV Prefix

9. Step 2: Situational Map C PL PR W C+ PL- C- PL+ PR+ W+ PR- W- Current Position Better

10. Step 3: SWOT Matrix Analysis Figure 1: SWOT Analysis showing RFV factor comparison values and cross products RFV 6 2 0 4 2 6 4 0 W4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W3 0 3 1 0 2 1 3 2 0 W2 1 9 3 0 6 3 9 6 0 W1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PR4 0 9 3 0 6 3 9 6 0 PR3 3 6 2 0 4 2 6 4 0 PR2 2 3 1 0 2 1 3 2 0 PR1 1 PL4 PL3 PL2 PL1 C4 C3 C2 C1 3 1 0 2 1 3 2 0

11. Step 3: SWOT Matrix Analysis Figure 2: SWOT Analysis showing weighted RFV factor comparison values and cross products RFV FAV 2.7 0.6 0 1.4 0.6 2.7 1.6 0 W4 1.0 2 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W3 0 0 0.2 1.08 0.24 0 0.56 0.24 1.08 0.64 0 W2 0.4 1 0.4 5.67 1.26 0 2.94 1.26 5.67 3.36 0 W1 2.1 3 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PR4 0 0 0.4 6.48 1.44 0 3.36 1.44 6.48 3.84 0 PR3 2.4 3 0.8 3.24 0.72 0 1.68 0.72 3.24 1.92 0 PR2 1.0 2 0.6 1.35 0.3 0 0.7 0.3 1.35 0.8 0 PR1 0.5 1 0.5 PL4 PL3 PL2 PL1 C4 C3 C2 C1 2.7 0.6 0 1.4 0.6 2.7 1.6 0 3 1 0 2 1 3 2 0 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.5

12. Four (4) Situational Maps C PL PR W C+ PL- C- PL+ PR+ W+ PR- W- Current Position Better

13. Four (4) Situational Maps PL C PR W PL+ C- PL- C+ PR+ W+ PR- W- Current Position Better Switch factors position

14. Four (4) Situational Maps PL C PR W PL+ C- PL- C+ PR+ W+ PR- W- Current Position Better

15. Four (4) Situational Maps C PL W PR C+ PL- C- PL+ W+ PR+ W- PR- Current Position Better

16. Four (4) Situational Maps PL C PL+ C- PL- C+ Current Position Better W PR W+ PR+ W- PR-

17. Project Updates Further analysis of current techniques. Interpretations of cross product and division values in SWOT Matrix Analysis. Funding for continue to further complete and extend this research. Real Data (Collection and Analysis) Knowledge-wise (Factor Analysis, Statistics) Implementation of 3D visual info graphic in NSA.

18. Situational Map + Future Strategy/Objective PL C PL+ C- PL- C+ Current Position Better W PR W+ PR+ W- PR- Future

19. 2D/3D Visual Info

20. SWOT Matrix Analysis + Threshold Figure 2: SWOT Analysis showing weighted RFV factor comparison values and cross products RFV FAV 2.7 0.6 0 1.4 0.6 2.7 1.6 0 W4 1.0 2 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W3 0 0 0.2 1.08 0.24 0 0.56 0.24 1.08 0.64 0 W2 0.4 1 0.4 5.67 1.26 0 2.94 1.26 5.67 3.36 0 W1 2.1 3 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PR4 0 0 0.4 6.48 1.44 0 3.36 1.44 6.48 3.84 0 PR3 2.4 3 0.8 3.24 0.72 0 1.68 0.72 3.24 1.92 0 PR2 1.0 2 0.6 1.35 0.3 0 0.7 0.3 1.35 0.8 0 PR1 0.5 1 0.5 PL4 PL3 PL2 PL1 C4 C3 C2 C1 2.7 0.6 0 1.4 0.6 2.7 1.6 0 3 1 0 2 1 3 2 0 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.5

21. SWOT Matrix Analysis + Threshold Figure 2: SWOT Analysis showing weighted RFV factor comparison values and cross products RFV FAV Threshold: Cross Product value > 2.5 2.7 2.7 W4 1.0 2 0.5 W3 0 0 0.2 W2 0.4 1 0.4 5.67 2.94 5.67 3.36 W1 2.1 3 0.7 PR4 0 0 0.4 6.48 3.36 6.48 3.84 PR3 2.4 3 0.8 3.24 3.24 PR2 1.0 2 0.6 PR1 0.5 1 0.5 PL4 PL3 PL2 PL1 C4 C3 C2 C1 2.7 0.6 0 1.4 0.6 2.7 1.6 0 3 1 0 2 1 3 2 0 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.5

22. References Davies. A., John. E. G. Strategy Identification via Numerical Analysis . Cardiff University Staff Research Paper. 2007. Davies. A., John. E. G. Strategy Selection via Numerical Situation Analysis . Cardiff University Staff Research Paper. 2007. Jardine, A K S. Operational Research in Maintenance. Great Britain . Manchester University Press. 1970. Other books: http://mohdrafie.co.uk/nsa/category/references/books/

23. References Data Visualization – http://mohdrafie.co.uk/nsa/data-visualization/ Delicious Bookmark – http://delicious.com/mohdrafie/FYP

24. http://mohdrafie.co.uk/nsa or http://tinyurl/nsacardiff

25. NSA (Use In Maintenance) Presented by Mohd Rafie KAMARUZAMAN Final Year Student of Mechanical Engineering (BEng) Hons Cardiff University [email_address] http://mohdrafie.co.uk/nsa