"Outside Spending" is nothing new to American politics. This presentation, compiled by the North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation, is a historical analysis of the different types of outside groups and their spending.
The document outlines key concepts for political fundraising including defining different types of donors and prospects, segmentation of fundraising sources, and selecting appropriate fundraising programs. It describes how to segment a campaign's fundraising universe into sources of funding like the campaign committee, opponents' donors, and industry groups. These sources are then divided into source groups of major donor fundraisers, climbers, and base supporters. Different fundraising programs like direct mail, email, and events are recommended to target each source group. The goal is to implement tailored fundraising programs to solicit donations from different segments of the fundraising universe.
This document provides an introduction and literature review for a research paper analyzing CEO compensation at large American charities. The introduction discusses the debate around nonprofit executive compensation and outlines the research questions and methodology that will be used. The literature review covers the context of nonprofits in the US, including IRS requirements around tax exemptions, governance, and sanctions. It also summarizes existing research on factors that influence nonprofit executive compensation, such as organizational size, and debates around what constitutes "reasonable" pay. The paper aims to reconcile differences between calls for lower nonprofit CEO pay and variables found to impact higher compensation.
Alliance Advisors Newsletter January 2012 (Debating Corporate Political Contr...Alliance Advisors
This document summarizes the debate around corporate political contributions and shareholder activism on this issue. It discusses the various types of shareholder proposals being filed in 2012, including those calling for disclosure of political spending and lobbying activities, as well as proposals seeking a shareholder vote on political contributions. The document also examines investor and proxy advisor perspectives on these issues and provides guidance to companies on best practices regarding political spending policies and disclosure.
The document defines and provides details on various types of interest groups and lobbying activities in the United States. It explains concepts like political action committees (PACs), which can donate up to $5,000 to candidates; the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and NAACP, prominent civil rights groups; litigation and Supreme Court cases that shaped campaign finance and civil rights law; and different strategies used by interest groups like grassroots mobilization and lobbying directly to legislators.
Fundraising involves gathering voluntary contributions of capital or resources from individuals, organizations, foundations, or government entities. While fundraising is often associated with non-profit organizations, it can also refer to raising funds for for-profit businesses. Traditionally, fundraising involved directly asking for donations in-person, but new forms like online fundraising have emerged in recent years based on older methods such as grassroots fundraising.
This document discusses estate planning through charitable giving, including private foundations and charitable trusts. It provides an overview of why people give to charity, the tax benefits of giving while alive versus at death, and outlines the key differences between private foundations and public charities. Additionally, it summarizes the requirements and tax implications of various charitable vehicles like charitable remainder trusts, charitable lead trusts, and private foundations.
This chapter discusses differences between presidential and congressional campaigns. Presidential races are larger in size and scope and see more spending. They are also more competitive than some congressional races. Campaigns require significant funding, which can come from public subsidies, individual donations, PACs, and the candidates' own money. Campaign finance is regulated by laws and enforced by the FEC, which places limits on certain types of contributions and expenditures. Winning elections requires effective campaign strategies that consider primaries, general elections, targeted voters, issues, media exposure, and other factors.
The document outlines key concepts for political fundraising including defining different types of donors and prospects, segmentation of fundraising sources, and selecting appropriate fundraising programs. It describes how to segment a campaign's fundraising universe into sources of funding like the campaign committee, opponents' donors, and industry groups. These sources are then divided into source groups of major donor fundraisers, climbers, and base supporters. Different fundraising programs like direct mail, email, and events are recommended to target each source group. The goal is to implement tailored fundraising programs to solicit donations from different segments of the fundraising universe.
This document provides an introduction and literature review for a research paper analyzing CEO compensation at large American charities. The introduction discusses the debate around nonprofit executive compensation and outlines the research questions and methodology that will be used. The literature review covers the context of nonprofits in the US, including IRS requirements around tax exemptions, governance, and sanctions. It also summarizes existing research on factors that influence nonprofit executive compensation, such as organizational size, and debates around what constitutes "reasonable" pay. The paper aims to reconcile differences between calls for lower nonprofit CEO pay and variables found to impact higher compensation.
Alliance Advisors Newsletter January 2012 (Debating Corporate Political Contr...Alliance Advisors
This document summarizes the debate around corporate political contributions and shareholder activism on this issue. It discusses the various types of shareholder proposals being filed in 2012, including those calling for disclosure of political spending and lobbying activities, as well as proposals seeking a shareholder vote on political contributions. The document also examines investor and proxy advisor perspectives on these issues and provides guidance to companies on best practices regarding political spending policies and disclosure.
The document defines and provides details on various types of interest groups and lobbying activities in the United States. It explains concepts like political action committees (PACs), which can donate up to $5,000 to candidates; the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and NAACP, prominent civil rights groups; litigation and Supreme Court cases that shaped campaign finance and civil rights law; and different strategies used by interest groups like grassroots mobilization and lobbying directly to legislators.
Fundraising involves gathering voluntary contributions of capital or resources from individuals, organizations, foundations, or government entities. While fundraising is often associated with non-profit organizations, it can also refer to raising funds for for-profit businesses. Traditionally, fundraising involved directly asking for donations in-person, but new forms like online fundraising have emerged in recent years based on older methods such as grassroots fundraising.
This document discusses estate planning through charitable giving, including private foundations and charitable trusts. It provides an overview of why people give to charity, the tax benefits of giving while alive versus at death, and outlines the key differences between private foundations and public charities. Additionally, it summarizes the requirements and tax implications of various charitable vehicles like charitable remainder trusts, charitable lead trusts, and private foundations.
This chapter discusses differences between presidential and congressional campaigns. Presidential races are larger in size and scope and see more spending. They are also more competitive than some congressional races. Campaigns require significant funding, which can come from public subsidies, individual donations, PACs, and the candidates' own money. Campaign finance is regulated by laws and enforced by the FEC, which places limits on certain types of contributions and expenditures. Winning elections requires effective campaign strategies that consider primaries, general elections, targeted voters, issues, media exposure, and other factors.
This document provides information and considerations for social workers starting a private practice. It discusses licensing requirements, costs, business structures, office locations, accepting insurance or operating as a cash-only practice, HIPAA compliance, potential legal issues like subpoenas, and the implications of telehealth. Key points covered include needing an LCSW license, obtaining 2 years of post-masters supervised experience, carrying malpractice insurance, deciding whether to open a solo or group practice, getting tax and NPI numbers, setting fees, and ensuring privacy for teletherapy clients. The document aims to outline major factors to evaluate when establishing a private counseling business.
Corporations, Module II: Policy, Lesson 3: Political ActionDuquesne University
Many laws have been passed over the years limiting the ability of corporations to participate in politics, but recent Supreme Court decisions have struck down many such laws. Corporations now enjoy new power to directly contribute to political campaigns. But has this changed politics? And, if so, for better or worse?
This document discusses campaign finance regulations in the United States. It provides background on campaign financing sources such as individuals, businesses, unions and PACs. It then outlines the history of campaign finance laws from the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to the Citizens United Supreme Court decision in 2010 that allowed unlimited independent expenditures by corporations and unions. The document explains that each time new regulations are passed, new ways to spend money on campaigns emerge, perpetuating the debate around campaign finance reform.
This presentation is brought to you by Iowa Economic Development Area. It explains what TSC is, why it matters, and how you can acquire the certification.
Crowdfunding has grown significantly in recent years, with an estimated $5.1 billion raised worldwide in 2013. However, the majority of successful crowdfunding campaigns on sites like Kickstarter raise $10,000 or less. While reward-based crowdfunding is largely unregulated, equity crowdfunding is subject to new regulations in both the US and Europe. The US JOBS Act allows for limited equity crowdfunding for up to $1 million annually per company and caps individual investments based on income, but imposes disclosure and financial reporting requirements that some argue are too burdensome for small companies. Equity crowdfunding through accredited investors is an alternative but also has limitations
North Carolina is one of the fastest growing states in America. The steady growth in population for North Carolina means that North Carolina's political landscape and electorate are rapidly changing and understanding these demographics is imperative to understanding North Carolina's evolving political future.
North Carolina's population has grown significantly from 5.1 million in 1970 to over 10 million in 2015, and it is projected to continue growing. Most of the future population growth is expected in Wake and Mecklenburg counties. One-third of North Carolina's counties are projected to lose population. The state has experienced a net migration gain of over 2.2 million people since 1990, especially among younger age groups. By 2020, millennials are expected to make up 31% of the population, and baby boomers 20%. The Hispanic population in North Carolina is growing, with over half of the Hispanic population under age 18.
This document provides ratings and analysis of North Carolina legislators from the 2013 legislative session based on their votes and positions on business issues. It finds that Republican legislators generally had higher ratings than Democrats, with ratings above 70 indicating consistent support for free enterprise principles important to the business community. It also notes some tensions between the governor and legislative leaders that hampered consideration of some pro-business proposals.
The North Carolina FreeEnterprise will track monthly publicly released polling and compile them in aggregated format to see shifts in voter attitudes as it related to North Carolina politics. The polling we will be tracking is listed below, please click on link to see the last trends.
While campaigning for elections in Bihar in 2005, Lalu Prasad Yadav and Ram Vilas Paswan used an Osama bin Laden look-alike to accompany them at rallies and criticize the United States, aiming to attract Muslim voters.
The North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation released its 2013 Legislative Business Ratings report, which analyzes the voting records and general disposition on business issues of North Carolina legislators. The report is based on a survey of over 400 business leaders and government affairs professionals. It assigns an objective rating based on votes on key business issues and a subjective rating of legislator support for business. Overall ratings were higher for Republican legislators and newcomers to the legislature. The report found that the 2013 legislative session was positive for business but partisan tensions negatively impacted some ratings.
The document analyzes PAC contributions during the 2013-2014 election cycle in North Carolina. It found that the top contributing PACs were similar to 2010, with healthcare PACs increasing contributions by 15% likely due to policy debates. Republicans received three times as much support as Democrats due to holding legislative control. However, outside groups spent significantly more than PACs, potentially signaling a declining role for traditional PACs in the future.
Presentation on shifts in voter attitudes over the past two decades and how increasing urbanization and diversification of our state's population are changing the political landscape in North Carolina.
The document analyzes PAC contributions in North Carolina for the 2011-2012 election cycle. It found that total PAC contributions increased 9.7% to $12.3 million. Republican candidates received 72% of contributions, up from 44% in 2009-2010, reflecting the party's increased political power in the state. Business PACs were the largest contributors and gave 78.7% of their $7 million to Republicans. Healthcare and labor PACs primarily supported Democrats while plaintiff attorneys and ideological PACs mostly backed Democratic candidates.
This document contains maps and information about the conventional voting behavior (CVB) ratings for North Carolina's 13 congressional districts, 50 state senate districts, and 120 state house districts based on election results since 2008. The CVB ratings categorize districts as strong Democrat, lean Democrat, competitive, lean Republican, or strong Republican based on the partisan performance advantage in recent statewide elections. Additional information is provided on the CVB methodology which analyzes election results from every statewide race to determine the degree to which voters in each district have historically favored Republican or Democratic candidates.
This document provides cash on hand totals for various North Carolina political candidates as of the second and third quarters of 2014. It lists totals for US Senate, US House, NC Senate, and NC House races. Notes indicate that red numbers are from the third quarter report and black numbers are from the second quarter report. Candidates are listed with their cash on hand amount and occupation/role.
Well before the official candidate filing period begins, the NC FreeEnterprise Foundation compiles and maintains one of the most comprehensive lists of candidates and would-be candidates in the state. Stay up-do-date on who is running and who is not through the NCFEF’s Election Tracker by clicking below.
This document provides an overview and analysis of North Carolina's 2014 election results and insights into the state's 2016 primary and general elections. It summarizes voter trends in urban and rural areas, highlights key congressional and state legislative races, and examines factors like generation gaps and population shifts that could impact upcoming elections. Non-partisan group NCFEF conducted the research to impartially analyze NC's political landscape.
The document summarizes results from the 2014 North Carolina elections. It shows that Republicans gained control of both chambers of the state legislature. In the US Senate race, Thom Tillis defeated incumbent Kay Hagan. Most statewide races and congressional races were won by Republicans. Maps show county-by-county results and the partisan leanings of state legislative districts following the election. The summary discusses open seat races in competitive districts and races that were close.
The document provides a practice exam for an electromania finals competition. It consists of 9 multiple choice and short answer questions testing knowledge of early computers, technology companies, electronics devices, binary operations, symbols, and video game history. Contestants are instructed to attempt all questions, which are worth various point values, and there is no penalty for incorrect answers.
This document provides information and considerations for social workers starting a private practice. It discusses licensing requirements, costs, business structures, office locations, accepting insurance or operating as a cash-only practice, HIPAA compliance, potential legal issues like subpoenas, and the implications of telehealth. Key points covered include needing an LCSW license, obtaining 2 years of post-masters supervised experience, carrying malpractice insurance, deciding whether to open a solo or group practice, getting tax and NPI numbers, setting fees, and ensuring privacy for teletherapy clients. The document aims to outline major factors to evaluate when establishing a private counseling business.
Corporations, Module II: Policy, Lesson 3: Political ActionDuquesne University
Many laws have been passed over the years limiting the ability of corporations to participate in politics, but recent Supreme Court decisions have struck down many such laws. Corporations now enjoy new power to directly contribute to political campaigns. But has this changed politics? And, if so, for better or worse?
This document discusses campaign finance regulations in the United States. It provides background on campaign financing sources such as individuals, businesses, unions and PACs. It then outlines the history of campaign finance laws from the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to the Citizens United Supreme Court decision in 2010 that allowed unlimited independent expenditures by corporations and unions. The document explains that each time new regulations are passed, new ways to spend money on campaigns emerge, perpetuating the debate around campaign finance reform.
This presentation is brought to you by Iowa Economic Development Area. It explains what TSC is, why it matters, and how you can acquire the certification.
Crowdfunding has grown significantly in recent years, with an estimated $5.1 billion raised worldwide in 2013. However, the majority of successful crowdfunding campaigns on sites like Kickstarter raise $10,000 or less. While reward-based crowdfunding is largely unregulated, equity crowdfunding is subject to new regulations in both the US and Europe. The US JOBS Act allows for limited equity crowdfunding for up to $1 million annually per company and caps individual investments based on income, but imposes disclosure and financial reporting requirements that some argue are too burdensome for small companies. Equity crowdfunding through accredited investors is an alternative but also has limitations
North Carolina is one of the fastest growing states in America. The steady growth in population for North Carolina means that North Carolina's political landscape and electorate are rapidly changing and understanding these demographics is imperative to understanding North Carolina's evolving political future.
North Carolina's population has grown significantly from 5.1 million in 1970 to over 10 million in 2015, and it is projected to continue growing. Most of the future population growth is expected in Wake and Mecklenburg counties. One-third of North Carolina's counties are projected to lose population. The state has experienced a net migration gain of over 2.2 million people since 1990, especially among younger age groups. By 2020, millennials are expected to make up 31% of the population, and baby boomers 20%. The Hispanic population in North Carolina is growing, with over half of the Hispanic population under age 18.
This document provides ratings and analysis of North Carolina legislators from the 2013 legislative session based on their votes and positions on business issues. It finds that Republican legislators generally had higher ratings than Democrats, with ratings above 70 indicating consistent support for free enterprise principles important to the business community. It also notes some tensions between the governor and legislative leaders that hampered consideration of some pro-business proposals.
The North Carolina FreeEnterprise will track monthly publicly released polling and compile them in aggregated format to see shifts in voter attitudes as it related to North Carolina politics. The polling we will be tracking is listed below, please click on link to see the last trends.
While campaigning for elections in Bihar in 2005, Lalu Prasad Yadav and Ram Vilas Paswan used an Osama bin Laden look-alike to accompany them at rallies and criticize the United States, aiming to attract Muslim voters.
The North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation released its 2013 Legislative Business Ratings report, which analyzes the voting records and general disposition on business issues of North Carolina legislators. The report is based on a survey of over 400 business leaders and government affairs professionals. It assigns an objective rating based on votes on key business issues and a subjective rating of legislator support for business. Overall ratings were higher for Republican legislators and newcomers to the legislature. The report found that the 2013 legislative session was positive for business but partisan tensions negatively impacted some ratings.
The document analyzes PAC contributions during the 2013-2014 election cycle in North Carolina. It found that the top contributing PACs were similar to 2010, with healthcare PACs increasing contributions by 15% likely due to policy debates. Republicans received three times as much support as Democrats due to holding legislative control. However, outside groups spent significantly more than PACs, potentially signaling a declining role for traditional PACs in the future.
Presentation on shifts in voter attitudes over the past two decades and how increasing urbanization and diversification of our state's population are changing the political landscape in North Carolina.
The document analyzes PAC contributions in North Carolina for the 2011-2012 election cycle. It found that total PAC contributions increased 9.7% to $12.3 million. Republican candidates received 72% of contributions, up from 44% in 2009-2010, reflecting the party's increased political power in the state. Business PACs were the largest contributors and gave 78.7% of their $7 million to Republicans. Healthcare and labor PACs primarily supported Democrats while plaintiff attorneys and ideological PACs mostly backed Democratic candidates.
This document contains maps and information about the conventional voting behavior (CVB) ratings for North Carolina's 13 congressional districts, 50 state senate districts, and 120 state house districts based on election results since 2008. The CVB ratings categorize districts as strong Democrat, lean Democrat, competitive, lean Republican, or strong Republican based on the partisan performance advantage in recent statewide elections. Additional information is provided on the CVB methodology which analyzes election results from every statewide race to determine the degree to which voters in each district have historically favored Republican or Democratic candidates.
This document provides cash on hand totals for various North Carolina political candidates as of the second and third quarters of 2014. It lists totals for US Senate, US House, NC Senate, and NC House races. Notes indicate that red numbers are from the third quarter report and black numbers are from the second quarter report. Candidates are listed with their cash on hand amount and occupation/role.
Well before the official candidate filing period begins, the NC FreeEnterprise Foundation compiles and maintains one of the most comprehensive lists of candidates and would-be candidates in the state. Stay up-do-date on who is running and who is not through the NCFEF’s Election Tracker by clicking below.
This document provides an overview and analysis of North Carolina's 2014 election results and insights into the state's 2016 primary and general elections. It summarizes voter trends in urban and rural areas, highlights key congressional and state legislative races, and examines factors like generation gaps and population shifts that could impact upcoming elections. Non-partisan group NCFEF conducted the research to impartially analyze NC's political landscape.
The document summarizes results from the 2014 North Carolina elections. It shows that Republicans gained control of both chambers of the state legislature. In the US Senate race, Thom Tillis defeated incumbent Kay Hagan. Most statewide races and congressional races were won by Republicans. Maps show county-by-county results and the partisan leanings of state legislative districts following the election. The summary discusses open seat races in competitive districts and races that were close.
The document provides a practice exam for an electromania finals competition. It consists of 9 multiple choice and short answer questions testing knowledge of early computers, technology companies, electronics devices, binary operations, symbols, and video game history. Contestants are instructed to attempt all questions, which are worth various point values, and there is no penalty for incorrect answers.
Demographic transition theory and Optimum PopulationPranjal Prateek
The document discusses demographic transition theory and optimum population. Demographic transition theory refers to the transition from high birth and death rates to lower rates as a country develops. This is demonstrated through a demographic transition model. China adopted policies like the one-child policy that led to declining fertility and a demographic transition. While China's population growth is now only 0.7% annually, India's is still higher at 1.6% and India will surpass China in population size by 2050 if trends continue. India's youth population will not outnumber older groups for decades, allowing for higher growth potential through a demographic dividend if policies support productive employment and education. The concept of optimum population refers to the best population size given ecological sustainability and carrying
This document provides an overview of different types of advocacy groups in the United States. It explains that groups like 501(c) organizations, 527 groups, political action committees (PACs), and super PACs all have different rules set by Congress and the FEC regarding how they can raise and spend money to influence politics. The document gives examples of prominent groups that fall under each category and directs readers to the website OpenSecrets.org for more information on different groups and their financial activities.
Money plays a large role in influencing US politics through various avenues such as interest groups, lobbyists, political action committees (PACs), and 527 organizations. Interest groups represent special interests and try to educate the public and influence politicians. Lobbyists directly communicate with politicians to persuade them to support certain legislation. PACs and 527s can raise unlimited funds which they use to support candidates and political issues. There are concerns about how these avenues for funding can undermine the political process when taken to an extreme.
This document provides information on 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status requirements for non-profit organizations. To qualify under 501(c)(3), an organization must be formed exclusively for charitable, educational, religious, scientific, literary, fostering national sports, or preventing cruelty purposes. It cannot be created to benefit specific individuals and must serve public rather than private interests. A 501(c)(3) is subject to limitations on legislative and political activities and cannot operate illegally. Examples of organizations that may qualify include churches, hospitals, schools, legal aid organizations, and arts groups. The document examines the requirements and cautions that 501(c)(3) may not be suitable for all non-profits.
This document provides information on 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status requirements for non-profit organizations. To qualify under 501(c)(3), an organization must be formed exclusively for charitable, educational, religious, scientific, literary, fostering national sports, or preventing cruelty purposes. It cannot be created to benefit specific individuals and must serve public rather than private interests. A 501(c)(3) is subject to limitations on legislative and political activities and cannot operate illegally or contrary to public policy. Examples of organizations that may qualify include churches, hospitals, schools, arts groups, and organizations providing various services to communities.
This document summarizes the impact of the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision on political activities and tax laws for trade associations. It discusses that trade associations can now use general treasury funds for independent expenditures and electioneering communications. However, they must still disclose spending and include disclaimers. While political activities do not jeopardize tax-exempt status, they could be subject to tax on some investment income. The document also reviews permissible lobbying and advocacy within tax laws.
This document discusses how interest groups and money influence politics following the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. It defines different types of political spending, including direct contributions, soft money, PACs, 527 and 501(c) groups. The McCain-Feingold and Citizens United cases are summarized. Citizens United struck down limits on corporate political spending as a free speech issue. This opened the door to greater influence of super PACs and dark money groups in elections, though most money spent did not achieve the intended result. Political cartoons critique the influence of big money in politics.
This document discusses interest groups and their role in influencing government. It defines interest groups as collections of people who share common interests and seek to influence policy. Interest groups engage in tactics like lobbying to achieve their goals. Examples are given of different types of interest groups, such as single-issue groups, as well as tactics they use like litigation. Problems that can arise with interest groups are also outlined, such as the disproportionate influence of some groups. Key terms related to interest groups and their activities are defined.
This presentation by Gary Pienaar (www.idasa.org) was given at a Transparency International conference –
Zimbabwe workshop on Political Finance in the SADC Region - the South African Experience.
August 2009
See more at www.idasa.org
This document discusses political action committees (PACs) and how they allow groups to collectively support political candidates aligned with their priorities and policies. It notes that PAC contributions send a message of industry interest and help raise political profiles. Successful PACs have vision, leadership, research, strategic planning, and compliance. It also discusses 501(c) organizations, corporate donations, Super PACs, and options for hiring firms to assist with political goals through fundraising, branding, and relationship building.
Tom Tresser prepared this presentation for his "Civics 101" class at i c stars (www.icstars.org). Tom's work is at www.tresser.com and www.civiclab.us. tom@civiclab.us
The document summarizes key aspects of federal campaign finance law before and after the Citizens United Supreme Court decision. It discusses how Citizens United struck down limits on independent corporate spending in elections and led to a rise in spending by super PACs and 501c4 nonprofit groups. While Citizens United allowed for increased political spending, the document notes the dicta in the decision around freeing nonprofits from political activity limits could be used to mount further legal challenges but may not be successful in the near term.
How Political Parties in Foreign Countries Take Election DonationsVoterMood
it has been customary in many American and European nations to disclose the source and amount of funds received by political parties. In 2014, several European countries passed laws governing political party fundraising, such as donation caps and the requirement for timely disclosure of big contributions.
Interest groups have become more common in the US due to the many divisions in American society and opportunities for groups to engage with the government system. Major periods of growth for interest groups included the late 1700s during independence movements, the 1830s-1860s during debates over slavery, and the 1900s onward as groups like the NAACP and farmers' unions organized. People join interest groups for social, material, and ideological reasons, and groups engage in activities like providing information to legislators, grassroots organizing, litigation, and lobbying to influence public policy. While money and campaign contributions can influence policy, other strategies may be more effective. Interest groups are regulated through disclosure requirements and tax laws.
American Government - Chapter 8 - Interest Groupscyruskarimian
The document discusses interest groups in America. It defines an interest group as a formally organized association that seeks to influence public policy on issues that reflect the diverse interests in society. Interest groups have grown substantially since the early 1800s and include diverse organizations such as corporations, labor unions, civil rights groups, and professional associations that maintain a presence in Washington. While business interests are well represented, many interests at the bottom of the economic spectrum have minimal representation. Interest groups employ various strategies and tactics to influence policymaking, including lobbying elected officials, mobilizing public support, and in some cases litigation.
02/27: IRS Guidance on Candidate Related Political Activityartba
The document is a letter from the American Road and Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) commenting on proposed IRS guidance regarding political activities of tax-exempt organizations. ARTBA argues that the proposed guidance would too broadly define advocacy as political activity, endangering the tax-exempt status of organizations. Specifically, the guidance would consider any communication mentioning a candidate and related legislation within 60 days of an election as political activity. This could negatively impact ARTBA's ability to inform its members about relevant transportation legislation. ARTBA urges the IRS to abandon the proposed guidance.
Case Study Grading Rubric – Fall 2015Levels of Quality.docxtidwellveronique
Case Study Grading Rubric – Fall 2015
Levels of Quality
Performance
Criteria
Needs Improvement
Meets Expectations
Exceptional
Structure
0 to 10 points
Disorganized
Needs reorganizing
Well organized, flows logically
Analysis
0 to 40 points
Mostly opinions, arguments not supported
Some arguments supported
All solid arguments with support
Style and Readability
0 to 10 points
Many misspellings, not edited, problems with grammar and sentence structure
Less than 3 misspellings, appears to be edited, grammar and sentence structure acceptable
No misspellings, well edited, grammar and sentence structure excellent, easily readable
Originality
0 to 20 points
Not original, based solely on lectures and readings
Less than 3 original insights and arguments
Many original insights and arguments
Thoroughness
0 to 20 points
Some elements of assignment not completed
All elements of assignment completed
All elements of assignment completed with exceptional thoroughness
Center for Public Integrity
The ‘Citizens United’ decision and why it matters
Nonprofits or political parties?
By John Dunbaremail
By now most folks know that the U.S. Supreme Court did something that changed how money can be spent in elections and by whom, but what happened and why should you care?
The Citizens United ruling, released in January 2010, tossed out the corporate and union ban on making independent expenditures and financing electioneering communications. It gave corporations and unions the green light to spend unlimited sums on ads and other political tools, calling for the election or defeat of individual candidates.
In a nutshell, the high court’s 5-4 decision said that it is OK for corporations and labor unions to spend as much as they want to convince people to vote for or against a candidate.
The decision did not affect contributions. It is still illegal for companies and labor unions to give money directly to candidates for federal office. The court said that because these funds were not being spent in coordination with a campaign, they “do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.”
So if the decision was about spending, why has so much been written about contributions? Like seven and eight-figure donations from people like casino magnate and billionaire Sheldon Adelson who, with his family, has given about $40 million to so-called “super PACs,” formed in the wake of the decision?
For that, we need to look at another court case — SpeechNow.org v. FEC. The lower-court case used the Citizens United case as precedent when it said that limits on contributions to groups that make independent expenditures are unconstitutional.
And that’s what led to the creation of the super PACs, which act as shadow political parties. They accept unlimited donations from billionaires, corporations and unions and use it to buy advertising, most of it negative.
The Supreme Court kept limits on disclosure in place, and super PACs are requi ...
Campaign spending, especially for presidential elections, has increased significantly over time as candidates need funds to campaign effectively through television ads, consultants, and other expenses. Funding comes from various private sources like individuals, political action committees, and temporary fundraising organizations, as well as some public funding from federal and state governments. Regulations have attempted to increase transparency around funding sources and limit certain contributions and expenditures to reduce corruption, but finding the right balance remains an ongoing challenge.
The IRS approves over 50,000 applications for 501(c)(3) nonprofit status every year, rejecting less than 2% of applications. Obtaining nonprofit status, which provides tax exemptions and allows tax-deductible donations, requires minimal oversight. The approval process has become a rubber stamp, with little scrutiny of applicants. The document examines approval rates from 1998 to 2008 and provides examples of bizarre organizations approved in 2008 to argue that "anything goes" in terms of what types of organizations can obtain nonprofit status. Reforms are proposed to strengthen oversight of the application process.
EPIP/NCRP Webinar | Supersized Imbalance: Post-2014 Election, What Foundation...EPIPNational
Philanthropy cannot work in a silo or vacuum; philanthropy and the communities it serves are influenced by policy and elections. At the start of 2015, state legislatures will be in full swing with plenty of interesting policy issues on the table. For this webinar, we were joined by experts who demonstrated effective tools for understanding contemporary policy issues. We also heared from a foundation that is using data-centric tools to bolster their agenda.
Speakers:
- Christine Reeves, Senior Field Associate, National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy & Board Member, EPIP (Moderator)
- Edwin Bender, Executive Director, National Institute on Money in State Politics
- Bert Brandenberg, Executive Director, Justice at Stake
- Tara Malloy, Senior Counsel, Campaign Legal Center
- Daniel Stid, Director of the Madison Initiative, William & Flora Hewlett Foundation
Campaign finance reform aims to regulate political spending and funding sources. Current regulations include contribution limits, disclosure requirements, and public financing options. However, recent Supreme Court rulings have loosened some restrictions by allowing unlimited independent expenditures and treating corporations similarly to people in terms of political spending. Critics argue this disproportionately benefits wealthy interests and undermines democracy, while supporters see it as protecting free speech. The impact of money in politics continues to be widely debated.
Similar to NCFEF Historical Analysis of Outside Spending (20)
The North Carolina Free Enterprise Foundation (NCFEF) publishes annual Legislative Business Ratings that evaluate North Carolina legislators based on their support for business and free enterprise principles during the legislative session. The 2017 ratings are based on objective voting records and subjective surveys of over 400 business leaders. Legislators receive a composite rating from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater alignment with business priorities. The document provides an overview of the methodology and defines rating thresholds for determining which legislators consistently support and occasionally support business positions. It then lists the ratings of all 170 state House and 50 state Senate members.
The document analyzes PAC contributions during the 2016 election cycle in North Carolina. It finds that total PAC giving was about the same as in 2012, with some shifts among PACs. Republicans received more funding than Democrats as Republicans control the state legislature. The top PACs that increased contributions the most were Duke Energy, NC Realtors Association, and NC Dental Society. Health, energy, and real estate PACs contributed the most money overall.
This document provides information and analysis on North Carolina's 2014 elections from the non-partisan North Carolina Citizens for Electoral Reform Education Fund (NCFEF). It includes details on NCFEF's research methods and outreach tools. The bulk of the document contains data and charts on voter turnout, polling results, and outcomes of the 2014 state and federal elections in North Carolina. Key races discussed include the US Senate race, Governor's race, and State Legislature elections.
This document provides a campaign finance report for various federal and state races in North Carolina for the second quarter of 2016. It lists candidates, their party affiliation, occupation, contact information, amounts raised, spent, and cash on hand as of June 30, 2016 for US Senate, US House of Representatives, Governor, Council of State positions, state Supreme Court, and Court of Appeals races.
This document provides results from North Carolina's 2016 primary elections, including candidates and vote percentages for US Senate, State Supreme Court, US Congress, Governor and Council of State offices, and NC Senate. Richard Burr and Roy Cooper won the Republican and Democratic primaries for US Senate and Governor respectively. Incumbents generally performed well with some primary challengers, such as for NC Treasurer and Attorney General, winning the nominations of their parties.
This document provides information on the 2016 primary elections in North Carolina. It includes updates on key races in the North Carolina State Senate and US Senate. It also provides an overview of the results of the 2016 presidential primary elections in North Carolina. Donald Trump won the Republican primary and Hillary Clinton won the Democratic primary.
This document provides information on candidates running for federal and state office in North Carolina in 2016. It lists the candidate's name, party affiliation, county, occupation, contact information including phone numbers and websites. Federal offices included are US Senate, US House of Representatives, and state offices listed are Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, State Auditor, and Treasurer. For each office, all identified candidates from the Democratic, Republican, Libertarian and Independent parties are provided.
The document provides information about the North Carolina Free Enterprise Foundation's (NCFEF) 2015 Legislative Business Ratings report. It summarizes the methodology used to rate North Carolina legislators based on their support for issues important to the business community. Surveys were sent to over 400 business leaders who provided objective ratings based on votes and subjective ratings of legislators' general disposition. Legislators received an overall rating from 0 to 100, with 70 or higher indicating solid support for free enterprise principles. The document lists the ratings received by each North Carolina state senator and representative.
The NCFEF Conventional Voting Behavior (CVB) rating is derived using actual election results from every statewide race since 2008 in which candidates ran on a partisan basis. Election result tabulations were made for every legislative district (13 Congressional districts, and 120 House and 50 Senate districts for the NC General Assembly) and done in a way to ensure split precinct data was assigned to the correct district.
The document discusses several factors influencing political landscapes and elections, including population growth, urbanization, changing voter attitudes/demographics, outside money, and the rise of millennials. It then provides data on changes to various state legislative districts in North Carolina based on redistricting, listing the incumbent representatives, their party affiliation, the percentage change in each district's partisan lean, and a classification of each district as being more competitive, leaning Democratic or Republican, or solidly partisan.
Just as important as who is running for office in North Carolina is which incumbents are not. Find out who has resigned, is retiring, running for other office, or otherwise leaving their position in North Carolina politics with the NCFEF’s Turnover Tracker.
More from North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation (11)
12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Slide deck with charts from our Digital News Report 2024, the most comprehensive exploration of news consumption habits around the world, based on survey data from more than 95,000 respondents across 47 countries.
Recent years have seen a disturbing rise in violence, discrimination, and intolerance against Christian communities in various Islamic countries. This multifaceted challenge, deeply rooted in historical, social, and political animosities, demands urgent attention. Despite the escalating persecution, substantial support from the Western world remains lacking.
projet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdfEdouardHusson
Ceci est le projet de traité qui avait été négocié entre Russes et Ukrainiens à Istanbul en mars 2022, avant que les Etats-Unis et la Grande-Bretagne ne détournent Kiev de signer.
ग्रेटर मुंबई के नगर आयुक्त को एक खुले पत्र में याचिका दायर कर 540 से अधिक मुंबईकरों ने सभी अवैध और अस्थिर होर्डिंग्स, साइनबोर्ड और इलेक्ट्रिक साइनेज को तत्काल हटाने और 13 मई, 2024 की शाम को घाटकोपर में अवैध होर्डिंग के गिरने की विनाशकारी घटना के बाद अपराधियों के खिलाफ सख्त कार्रवाई की मांग की है, जिसमें 17 लोगों की जान चली गई और कई निर्दोष लोग गंभीर रूप से घायल हो गए।
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu BiographyVoterMood
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...The Lifesciences Magazine
Federal authorities have advised the public to remain vigilant but calm in response to the ongoing bird flu outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza, commonly known as bird flu.
15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
लालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHYVoterMood
Discover the life and times of Lalu Prasad Yadav with a comprehensive biography in Hindi. Learn about his early days, rise in politics, controversies, and contribution.
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...rittaajmal71
Since fleeing to the United States in 2014, Guo Wengui has founded a number of projects in the United States, such as GTV Media Group, GTV private equity, farm loan project, G Club Operations Co., LTD., and Himalaya Exchange.
2. Types of “Outside Money” Groups
501(c) Groups — Nonprofit, tax-exempt groups organized under section 501(c)
of the Internal Revenue Code that can engage in varying amounts of political
activity, depending on the type of group. For example, 501(c)(3) groups operate
for religious, charitable, scientific or educational purposes. These groups are
not supposed to engage in any political activities, though some voter
registration activities are permitted. 501(c)(4) groups are commonly called
"social welfare" organizations that may engage in political activities, as long as
these activities do not become their primary purpose. Similar restrictions apply
to Section 501(c)(5) labor and agricultural groups, and to Section 501(c)(6)
business leagues, chambers of commerce, real estate boards and boards of
trade.
Source: Center of Responsive Politics
3. Types of “Outside Money” Groups
527 Group — A tax-exempt group organized under section 527 of the Internal
Revenue Code to raise money for political activities including voter mobilization
efforts, issue advocacy and the like. Currently, the FEC only requires a 527
group to file regular disclosure reports if it is a political party or political action
committee (PAC) that engages in either activities expressly advocating the
election or defeat of a federal candidate, or in electioneering communications.
Otherwise, it must file either with the government of the state in which it is
located or the Internal Revenue Service. Many 527s run by special interest
groups raise unlimited "soft money," which they use for voter mobilization and
certain types of issue advocacy, but not for efforts that expressly advocate the
election or defeat of a federal candidate or amount to electioneering
communications.
Source: Center of Responsive Politics
4. Types of “Outside Money” Groups
Super PACs — Super PACs are a new kind of political action committee
created in July 2010 following the outcome of a federal court case known as
SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission. Technically known as
independent expenditure-only committees, Super PACs may raise unlimited
sums of money from corporations, unions, associations and individuals, then
spend unlimited sums to overtly advocate for or against political candidates.
Super PACs must, however, report their donors to the Federal Election
Commission on a monthly or quarterly basis -- the Super PAC's choice -- as a
traditional PAC would. Unlike traditional PACs, Super PACs are prohibited from
donating money directly to political candidates.
Source: Center of Responsive Politics
5. Total By Type of Spender
Source: Center of Responsive Politics
$609,417,654
$256,263,118
$55,360,921
$23,913,873
$255,357,890
$92,821,398
$20,972,525
$4,170,237
$2,062,052
$344,573
$5,869,947 $5,749,805
$0
$100,000,000
$200,000,000
$300,000,000
$400,000,000
$500,000,000
$600,000,000
$700,000,000
Super PACs Social Welfare
501(c)(4)
Trade Assns 501(c)(6) Unions 501(c)(5) Parties Other (corporations,
individual people,
other groups, etc)
2012 2014 (2/26/14)
Total equals Federal & State Expenditures combined
6. Historical Summary: 501(c) Groups
$0
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
$300,000,000
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Trade Association 501(c)(6) Unions 501(c)(5) Social Welfare 501(c)(4)
Source: Center of Responsive Politics
7. Historical Summary: 501(c) Groups
$0
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
$300,000,000
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Liberal Conservative Other
Source: Center of Responsive Politics
8. Historical Summary: 527 Groups
$612,015,543
$429,468,398
$480,974,225
$590,550,387
$536,983,511
$0
$100,000,000
$200,000,000
$300,000,000
$400,000,000
$500,000,000
$600,000,000
$700,000,000
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Source: Center of Responsive Politics
9. Historical Summary: Super PACs
$24,616,429
$195,508,738
$14,236,239$36,687,362
$405,843,996
$6,340,899
$0
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
$300,000,000
$350,000,000
$400,000,000
$450,000,000
2010 2012 2014*
Liberal Conservative
Source: Center of Responsive Politics*Amount Spent as of February 27, 2014