The document analyzes PAC contributions in North Carolina for the 2011-2012 election cycle. It found that total PAC contributions increased 9.7% to $12.3 million. Republican candidates received 72% of contributions, up from 44% in 2009-2010, reflecting the party's increased political power in the state. Business PACs were the largest contributors and gave 78.7% of their $7 million to Republicans. Healthcare and labor PACs primarily supported Democrats while plaintiff attorneys and ideological PACs mostly backed Democratic candidates.
The document provides information about the North Carolina Free Enterprise Foundation's (NCFEF) 2015 Legislative Business Ratings report. It summarizes the methodology used to rate North Carolina legislators based on their support for issues important to the business community. Surveys were sent to over 400 business leaders who provided objective ratings based on votes and subjective ratings of legislators' general disposition. Legislators received an overall rating from 0 to 100, with 70 or higher indicating solid support for free enterprise principles. The document lists the ratings received by each North Carolina state senator and representative.
Overview of Nonprofit Sector - CincinnatiMichael Jones
The document provides an overview of the nonprofit sector in the Cincinnati region. It finds that 501c3 public charities represent the majority of nonprofits in the area. The largest foundations and public charities are identified by total assets and annual revenues. Health organizations dominate as the largest charities. The data also shows the geographical distribution of nonprofits across counties in the Cincinnati metro area.
This document provides an overview and analysis of 2015 Open Payments data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It finds that total payments to physicians were similar to 2014 at around $7.5 billion, while the number of physicians receiving payments and reporting companies decreased slightly. It also analyzes trends in payments by category and company, finding that food and beverage payments decreased on average while consulting fees increased. Additional data and tools are available to further analyze payments by company, physician, and location.
Nearly 250 nonprofits in Utah provide contractual services to 21 state agencies. A study by the Utah Nonprofit Association found that in 1995, the top five nonprofit categories by economic impact were individual and family services, medical facilities, civic/social groups, schools, and entertainment/recreational groups. The majority of Utah's nonprofits are small but account for most of the sector's assets and growth. The study aimed to analyze the scope and economic contribution of Utah's large nonprofit sector.
The Chamber President and CEO, Aaron Nelson, presents a 101 for each session of Leadership Chapel Hill-Carrboro to help level-set and frame the discussion of the day. Session #5 was on health and human services, and Aaron's presentation includes data on health outcomes and several social determinants of health in Orange County in comparison to neighboring counties.
Presentation by Aaron Nelson to the Leadership Chapel Hill-Carrboro Class of 2019 on Economic Development and the Environment. This was Leadership Session 6 of 10 and took place in Hillsborough, NC at the Orange County Public Library.
The Charity Parliamentary Monitor is a cost-effective way to find out how your
organisation is viewed at Westminster. Once you know where you stand, you are in a
much better position to evaluate whether your campaigns are working, and to make
improvements with the help of your target audience – the MPs and Lords themselves.
The document provides information about the North Carolina Free Enterprise Foundation's (NCFEF) 2015 Legislative Business Ratings report. It summarizes the methodology used to rate North Carolina legislators based on their support for issues important to the business community. Surveys were sent to over 400 business leaders who provided objective ratings based on votes and subjective ratings of legislators' general disposition. Legislators received an overall rating from 0 to 100, with 70 or higher indicating solid support for free enterprise principles. The document lists the ratings received by each North Carolina state senator and representative.
Overview of Nonprofit Sector - CincinnatiMichael Jones
The document provides an overview of the nonprofit sector in the Cincinnati region. It finds that 501c3 public charities represent the majority of nonprofits in the area. The largest foundations and public charities are identified by total assets and annual revenues. Health organizations dominate as the largest charities. The data also shows the geographical distribution of nonprofits across counties in the Cincinnati metro area.
This document provides an overview and analysis of 2015 Open Payments data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It finds that total payments to physicians were similar to 2014 at around $7.5 billion, while the number of physicians receiving payments and reporting companies decreased slightly. It also analyzes trends in payments by category and company, finding that food and beverage payments decreased on average while consulting fees increased. Additional data and tools are available to further analyze payments by company, physician, and location.
Nearly 250 nonprofits in Utah provide contractual services to 21 state agencies. A study by the Utah Nonprofit Association found that in 1995, the top five nonprofit categories by economic impact were individual and family services, medical facilities, civic/social groups, schools, and entertainment/recreational groups. The majority of Utah's nonprofits are small but account for most of the sector's assets and growth. The study aimed to analyze the scope and economic contribution of Utah's large nonprofit sector.
The Chamber President and CEO, Aaron Nelson, presents a 101 for each session of Leadership Chapel Hill-Carrboro to help level-set and frame the discussion of the day. Session #5 was on health and human services, and Aaron's presentation includes data on health outcomes and several social determinants of health in Orange County in comparison to neighboring counties.
Presentation by Aaron Nelson to the Leadership Chapel Hill-Carrboro Class of 2019 on Economic Development and the Environment. This was Leadership Session 6 of 10 and took place in Hillsborough, NC at the Orange County Public Library.
The Charity Parliamentary Monitor is a cost-effective way to find out how your
organisation is viewed at Westminster. Once you know where you stand, you are in a
much better position to evaluate whether your campaigns are working, and to make
improvements with the help of your target audience – the MPs and Lords themselves.
Are politicians hurting as much as your family? Probably not, given the average net worth for an elected official in Washington, D.C. is just under $1 Million. In an effort to get a better idea of how much some of these people are actually worth, we did some research and compiled a list of the 15 wealthiest politicians currently serving in Congress (via estimated net worth):
2011-2016 Loveland Region Industry Profile Across Other Colorado RegionsMichael Masciola
This document provides an industry and occupational profile comparison across the Loveland region, Denver metro area, and Colorado for 2011 and 2016. Some key findings include:
- The Loveland region saw 17% jobs growth between 2011-2016 compared to 18% in Denver and 15% statewide.
- Industries with the highest growth in the Loveland region were construction (44% growth), mining/oil/gas (30%), and management companies (26%).
- The Loveland region had higher than national average concentrations ("location quotients") in industries like mining, professional services, and information in both 2011 and 2016.
- Top occupations in the Loveland region in 2011 and 2016 were retail
Haynes and Boone, LLP Oil Patch Bankruptcy Monitor - June 2016 editionMarcellus Drilling News
Haynes and Boone has been tracking 85 North American oil and gas producer bankruptcies since 2015. As of June 30, 2016, 43 producers have filed for bankruptcy in 2016, representing approximately $44 billion in cumulative secured and unsecured debt. During June 2016, four producers filed for bankruptcy with $1.5 billion in cumulative debt, compared to 11 filings in April with $14.7 billion debt and 12 filings in May with $25.6 billion debt. Texas bankruptcy courts have overseen the most filings, with 43 representing approximately $29 billion in debt.
Haynes and Boone, LLP Oil Patch Bankruptcy Monitor - April 2016 editionMarcellus Drilling News
Haynes and Boone has tracked 59 North American oil and gas producers that have filed for bankruptcy since 2015, involving approximately $18.98 billion in cumulative secured and unsecured debt. As of April 3, 2016, 17 producers have filed for bankruptcy already this year. The law firm expects many more producer bankruptcy filings in 2016 given the ongoing slump in commodity prices. Haynes and Boone provides legal counsel to debtors, creditors, and private equity investors in oil and gas bankruptcies and restructurings.
The US Housing Market - Housing Supply & DemandAltos Research
Presented at the San Jose Real Estate Investors Conference, Scott Sambucci explores current housing demand and supply drivers and housing affordability.
This document summarizes findings from new data on out-of-pocket health care spending in the Current Population Survey. It finds that nearly 20% of Americans spend more than 10% of their income on health costs (high burden) and 8% spend more than 20% (very high burden). Burden varies by state. The Affordable Care Act could help many by reducing burden, though an estimated 40 million would still face high costs. Policy solutions are needed to further address the issue, especially for those with employer coverage or who are elderly.
A list (as of November 2015) of 36 oil and gas companies that filed for bankruptcy protection in 2015. The downturn in prices has affected many O&G companies. Law firm Haynes and Boone track the list, and warn that others may yet be added to it before the end of 2015.
The document summarizes information about Michigan's Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) program. It explains that the state EITC provides tax relief for low-income working families, offsets the regressive nature of the tax system, and stimulates the local economy. Over 700,000 Michigan residents benefit from the EITC, which keeps 14,000 children out of poverty and lifts 25,000 working families above the poverty line. However, the governor has proposed eliminating the EITC to help finance business tax cuts, which polls show is an unpopular idea among voters.
The PRC Region 8 Regional Needs Assessment (RNA) is report on the 28 counties of South Central Texas assessing the substance abuse trends, identifying community resources and helping communities utilize data to help guide prevention strategies. This report is the complete full version of the RNA.
The document analyzes PAC contributions during the 2016 election cycle in North Carolina. It finds that total PAC giving was about the same as in 2012, with some shifts among PACs. Republicans received more funding than Democrats as Republicans control the state legislature. The top PACs that increased contributions the most were Duke Energy, NC Realtors Association, and NC Dental Society. Health, energy, and real estate PACs contributed the most money overall.
The document analyzes PAC contributions during the 2013-2014 election cycle in North Carolina. It found that the top contributing PACs were similar to 2010, with healthcare PACs increasing contributions by 15% likely due to policy debates. Republicans received three times as much support as Democrats due to holding legislative control. However, outside groups spent significantly more than PACs, potentially signaling a declining role for traditional PACs in the future.
SGA Talent Presents Who's Who Among The Top Hospitals & SystemsSGA Talent
For decades, SGA Talent has helped
healthcare companies recruit top talent for
their organizations. As we continue to build
robust talent pools by identifying industry
talent, as well as engaging, recruiting and
creating strong networks, we always look to
hire only the best who will help our clients
execute their strategy. Backed by our
in-house recruitment research
powerhouse, along with our recruiters
having years of experience in this industry,
we continue to be the go-to partner for
recruiting key players.
SGA Talent Presents Who's Who Among The Top Hospitals & SystemsSGA Talent
For decades, SGA Talent has helped healthcare companies recruit top talent for their organizations. As we continue to build robust talent pools by identifying industry talent, as well as engaging, recruiting and creating strong networks, we always look to hire only the best who will help our clients execute their strategy. Backed by our in-house recruitment research powerhouse, along with our recruiters having years of experience in this industry, we continue to be the go-to partner for recruiting key players.
This is from a brief workshop we did at Arizona SkySong for local health care executives. All about the current state of value-based care, accountable care organizations, and general trends we're seeing within the health care delivery space.
The document summarizes the key findings of the 2014 North Carolina Clean Energy Industry Census. It finds that the clean energy industry in North Carolina now has over 1,200 firms, provides nearly 23,000 jobs, and generates $4.8 billion in annual revenue. Employment has increased 25% annually since 2012. Revenue has also increased 15% annually since 2012. Building efficiency is the largest clean energy sector in North Carolina, accounting for 38% of firms and nearly half of all clean energy jobs in the state.
This document provides cost of care data for various long-term care services in North Carolina, including home care, adult day care, assisted living facilities, and nursing homes. It lists the minimum, median, and maximum rates for each service by region in the state. For most services and regions, the median annual rates have increased slightly (usually 1-3%) over the past five years. The document is from the 2013 Genworth Cost of Care Survey, which collects this cost data to help Americans plan for long-term care expenses.
Censo da Indústria de Energia Limpa da Carolina do NorteGiovanni Sandes
The document is a report from the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association summarizing the results of the 2013 North Carolina Clean Energy Industry Census. Some key findings from the census include:
- The clean energy industry employed 18,404 people in North Carolina in 2013, a 20% increase from 2012.
- The largest sectors by employment were energy efficiency and building sciences (5,411 jobs), solar (2,422 jobs), and smart grid infrastructure (4,177 jobs).
- The industry generated $3.6 billion in revenues in 2013, led by the solar ($1.1 billion), energy efficiency ($985 million), and smart grid ($611 million) sectors.
- Clean energy firms have office locations across all
Leadership Chapel Hill-Carrboro (Leadership) is an extensive program designed to inform, develop, connect, and engage committed and emerging leaders in Greater Chapel Hill-Carrboro.
This presentation was delivered during Leadership 2022, Session #8 on Economic and Community Development.
South Shore Clean Cities (SSCC), in partnership with the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC), presents the latest edition of its “Promoting Sustainability” webinar series “Solar Up Northwest Indiana.”
Representatives from Boston-based, Meister Consultants Group will be the guest presenters for the webinar. Anyone interested in clean energy, especially residential and commercial Photovoltaic, green builders, homeowners, solar installers and local government officials, is invited to attend this free webinar.
The webinar will cover: Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission’s Rooftop Solar Challenge II Grant: Purpose and Goals, Rooftop Solar 101 Benefits and Barriers, Solar Myth Busters and Best Practices. SSCC and NIRPC will be assembling a stakeholder advisory group for this project.
This document summarizes information about FamMedPAC, a political action committee run by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) that aims to elect candidates supporting AAFP's legislative goals. It provides details on FamMedPAC's fundraising efforts, including that in 2014 it contributed $541,000 to 106 candidates from donations of $594,893 from AAFP members. The document also lists the top 10 states and chapters by total and percentage of donations to FamMedPAC in 2013-2014.
This presentation was given on April 7, 2014 as part of FMCC 2014. The presentation gave a brief update on how AAFP's federal political action committee is giving family medicine a "seat at the table" as Congress discusses health issues.
Are politicians hurting as much as your family? Probably not, given the average net worth for an elected official in Washington, D.C. is just under $1 Million. In an effort to get a better idea of how much some of these people are actually worth, we did some research and compiled a list of the 15 wealthiest politicians currently serving in Congress (via estimated net worth):
2011-2016 Loveland Region Industry Profile Across Other Colorado RegionsMichael Masciola
This document provides an industry and occupational profile comparison across the Loveland region, Denver metro area, and Colorado for 2011 and 2016. Some key findings include:
- The Loveland region saw 17% jobs growth between 2011-2016 compared to 18% in Denver and 15% statewide.
- Industries with the highest growth in the Loveland region were construction (44% growth), mining/oil/gas (30%), and management companies (26%).
- The Loveland region had higher than national average concentrations ("location quotients") in industries like mining, professional services, and information in both 2011 and 2016.
- Top occupations in the Loveland region in 2011 and 2016 were retail
Haynes and Boone, LLP Oil Patch Bankruptcy Monitor - June 2016 editionMarcellus Drilling News
Haynes and Boone has been tracking 85 North American oil and gas producer bankruptcies since 2015. As of June 30, 2016, 43 producers have filed for bankruptcy in 2016, representing approximately $44 billion in cumulative secured and unsecured debt. During June 2016, four producers filed for bankruptcy with $1.5 billion in cumulative debt, compared to 11 filings in April with $14.7 billion debt and 12 filings in May with $25.6 billion debt. Texas bankruptcy courts have overseen the most filings, with 43 representing approximately $29 billion in debt.
Haynes and Boone, LLP Oil Patch Bankruptcy Monitor - April 2016 editionMarcellus Drilling News
Haynes and Boone has tracked 59 North American oil and gas producers that have filed for bankruptcy since 2015, involving approximately $18.98 billion in cumulative secured and unsecured debt. As of April 3, 2016, 17 producers have filed for bankruptcy already this year. The law firm expects many more producer bankruptcy filings in 2016 given the ongoing slump in commodity prices. Haynes and Boone provides legal counsel to debtors, creditors, and private equity investors in oil and gas bankruptcies and restructurings.
The US Housing Market - Housing Supply & DemandAltos Research
Presented at the San Jose Real Estate Investors Conference, Scott Sambucci explores current housing demand and supply drivers and housing affordability.
This document summarizes findings from new data on out-of-pocket health care spending in the Current Population Survey. It finds that nearly 20% of Americans spend more than 10% of their income on health costs (high burden) and 8% spend more than 20% (very high burden). Burden varies by state. The Affordable Care Act could help many by reducing burden, though an estimated 40 million would still face high costs. Policy solutions are needed to further address the issue, especially for those with employer coverage or who are elderly.
A list (as of November 2015) of 36 oil and gas companies that filed for bankruptcy protection in 2015. The downturn in prices has affected many O&G companies. Law firm Haynes and Boone track the list, and warn that others may yet be added to it before the end of 2015.
The document summarizes information about Michigan's Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) program. It explains that the state EITC provides tax relief for low-income working families, offsets the regressive nature of the tax system, and stimulates the local economy. Over 700,000 Michigan residents benefit from the EITC, which keeps 14,000 children out of poverty and lifts 25,000 working families above the poverty line. However, the governor has proposed eliminating the EITC to help finance business tax cuts, which polls show is an unpopular idea among voters.
The PRC Region 8 Regional Needs Assessment (RNA) is report on the 28 counties of South Central Texas assessing the substance abuse trends, identifying community resources and helping communities utilize data to help guide prevention strategies. This report is the complete full version of the RNA.
The document analyzes PAC contributions during the 2016 election cycle in North Carolina. It finds that total PAC giving was about the same as in 2012, with some shifts among PACs. Republicans received more funding than Democrats as Republicans control the state legislature. The top PACs that increased contributions the most were Duke Energy, NC Realtors Association, and NC Dental Society. Health, energy, and real estate PACs contributed the most money overall.
The document analyzes PAC contributions during the 2013-2014 election cycle in North Carolina. It found that the top contributing PACs were similar to 2010, with healthcare PACs increasing contributions by 15% likely due to policy debates. Republicans received three times as much support as Democrats due to holding legislative control. However, outside groups spent significantly more than PACs, potentially signaling a declining role for traditional PACs in the future.
SGA Talent Presents Who's Who Among The Top Hospitals & SystemsSGA Talent
For decades, SGA Talent has helped
healthcare companies recruit top talent for
their organizations. As we continue to build
robust talent pools by identifying industry
talent, as well as engaging, recruiting and
creating strong networks, we always look to
hire only the best who will help our clients
execute their strategy. Backed by our
in-house recruitment research
powerhouse, along with our recruiters
having years of experience in this industry,
we continue to be the go-to partner for
recruiting key players.
SGA Talent Presents Who's Who Among The Top Hospitals & SystemsSGA Talent
For decades, SGA Talent has helped healthcare companies recruit top talent for their organizations. As we continue to build robust talent pools by identifying industry talent, as well as engaging, recruiting and creating strong networks, we always look to hire only the best who will help our clients execute their strategy. Backed by our in-house recruitment research powerhouse, along with our recruiters having years of experience in this industry, we continue to be the go-to partner for recruiting key players.
This is from a brief workshop we did at Arizona SkySong for local health care executives. All about the current state of value-based care, accountable care organizations, and general trends we're seeing within the health care delivery space.
The document summarizes the key findings of the 2014 North Carolina Clean Energy Industry Census. It finds that the clean energy industry in North Carolina now has over 1,200 firms, provides nearly 23,000 jobs, and generates $4.8 billion in annual revenue. Employment has increased 25% annually since 2012. Revenue has also increased 15% annually since 2012. Building efficiency is the largest clean energy sector in North Carolina, accounting for 38% of firms and nearly half of all clean energy jobs in the state.
This document provides cost of care data for various long-term care services in North Carolina, including home care, adult day care, assisted living facilities, and nursing homes. It lists the minimum, median, and maximum rates for each service by region in the state. For most services and regions, the median annual rates have increased slightly (usually 1-3%) over the past five years. The document is from the 2013 Genworth Cost of Care Survey, which collects this cost data to help Americans plan for long-term care expenses.
Censo da Indústria de Energia Limpa da Carolina do NorteGiovanni Sandes
The document is a report from the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association summarizing the results of the 2013 North Carolina Clean Energy Industry Census. Some key findings from the census include:
- The clean energy industry employed 18,404 people in North Carolina in 2013, a 20% increase from 2012.
- The largest sectors by employment were energy efficiency and building sciences (5,411 jobs), solar (2,422 jobs), and smart grid infrastructure (4,177 jobs).
- The industry generated $3.6 billion in revenues in 2013, led by the solar ($1.1 billion), energy efficiency ($985 million), and smart grid ($611 million) sectors.
- Clean energy firms have office locations across all
Leadership Chapel Hill-Carrboro (Leadership) is an extensive program designed to inform, develop, connect, and engage committed and emerging leaders in Greater Chapel Hill-Carrboro.
This presentation was delivered during Leadership 2022, Session #8 on Economic and Community Development.
South Shore Clean Cities (SSCC), in partnership with the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC), presents the latest edition of its “Promoting Sustainability” webinar series “Solar Up Northwest Indiana.”
Representatives from Boston-based, Meister Consultants Group will be the guest presenters for the webinar. Anyone interested in clean energy, especially residential and commercial Photovoltaic, green builders, homeowners, solar installers and local government officials, is invited to attend this free webinar.
The webinar will cover: Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission’s Rooftop Solar Challenge II Grant: Purpose and Goals, Rooftop Solar 101 Benefits and Barriers, Solar Myth Busters and Best Practices. SSCC and NIRPC will be assembling a stakeholder advisory group for this project.
This document summarizes information about FamMedPAC, a political action committee run by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) that aims to elect candidates supporting AAFP's legislative goals. It provides details on FamMedPAC's fundraising efforts, including that in 2014 it contributed $541,000 to 106 candidates from donations of $594,893 from AAFP members. The document also lists the top 10 states and chapters by total and percentage of donations to FamMedPAC in 2013-2014.
This presentation was given on April 7, 2014 as part of FMCC 2014. The presentation gave a brief update on how AAFP's federal political action committee is giving family medicine a "seat at the table" as Congress discusses health issues.
This document summarizes a research paper about different paths to hyper-growth in the nonprofit sector. It divides nonprofits into three segments: customer-oriented, beneficiary-oriented, and system-oriented. It analyzed the 20 fastest growing nonprofits between 2007-2011 based on revenue and classified them into these three segments. Key interviews with these organizations and consultants aimed to understand decisions and circumstances leading to rapid growth for each segment. While revenue growth does not equal impact, the study seeks lessons on achieving financially sustainable scaling of impact.
The document provides an annual report for the Breast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska (BCDC) for the 2014-2015 fiscal year. It summarizes that BCDC had a successful year, serving over 2,500 patients across Alaska. Donor support allowed them to add new mammography machines and educational programs. Financial information shows increased revenue, expenses, and assets while maintaining their mission of breast cancer screening and education.
The document discusses the Economic Census conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau every 5 years. It provides an overview of the types of economic data collected at various geographic levels, from national to ZIP code. It also outlines some benefits and limitations of the data. A case study example shows how data on the pharmaceutical industry in North Carolina can be used to determine the size and economic impact of that industry for the state.
The report evaluates options for increasing lottery proceeds for education in North Carolina. It finds that annual lottery revenues have steadily grown over the NC Lottery's 10 years of operation. The NC Lottery's performance is slightly above average compared to other states. Expanding the retailer network and reducing retailer compensation could increase lottery revenue. Additional options like video lottery terminals and online games may also boost sales and transfers to education. Improved data analysis could help measure the impact of advertising spending. The report recommends the NC Lottery set retailer growth targets, examine compensation structures, provide a business case for revenue options, and annually report on advertising effectiveness.
Options Exist for Increasing Lottery Proceeds for EducationEducationNC
The report examines options for increasing lottery proceeds for education in North Carolina. It finds that annual lottery revenues have steadily grown over the NC Lottery's 10 years of operation. While performance is slightly above average compared to other states, some options could further increase proceeds transferred to education. These include expanding the retailer network, reducing retailer compensation, and offering new games like video lottery terminals or online games. Improved data analysis could also help measure advertising effectiveness. The report recommends targets for retailer growth and studies of alternative retailer compensation and new revenue options.
This presentation was given to the Gov't. Resources Section of NCSLA on June 15, 2011 as part of their "Help! I'm an Accidental Gov'g Info Librarian" in which I talk about the value of the Economic Census as a resource.
The North Carolina Free Enterprise Foundation (NCFEF) publishes annual Legislative Business Ratings that evaluate North Carolina legislators based on their support for business and free enterprise principles during the legislative session. The 2017 ratings are based on objective voting records and subjective surveys of over 400 business leaders. Legislators receive a composite rating from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater alignment with business priorities. The document provides an overview of the methodology and defines rating thresholds for determining which legislators consistently support and occasionally support business positions. It then lists the ratings of all 170 state House and 50 state Senate members.
This document provides information and analysis on North Carolina's 2014 elections from the non-partisan North Carolina Citizens for Electoral Reform Education Fund (NCFEF). It includes details on NCFEF's research methods and outreach tools. The bulk of the document contains data and charts on voter turnout, polling results, and outcomes of the 2014 state and federal elections in North Carolina. Key races discussed include the US Senate race, Governor's race, and State Legislature elections.
This document provides a campaign finance report for various federal and state races in North Carolina for the second quarter of 2016. It lists candidates, their party affiliation, occupation, contact information, amounts raised, spent, and cash on hand as of June 30, 2016 for US Senate, US House of Representatives, Governor, Council of State positions, state Supreme Court, and Court of Appeals races.
This document provides results from North Carolina's 2016 primary elections, including candidates and vote percentages for US Senate, State Supreme Court, US Congress, Governor and Council of State offices, and NC Senate. Richard Burr and Roy Cooper won the Republican and Democratic primaries for US Senate and Governor respectively. Incumbents generally performed well with some primary challengers, such as for NC Treasurer and Attorney General, winning the nominations of their parties.
This document provides information on the 2016 primary elections in North Carolina. It includes updates on key races in the North Carolina State Senate and US Senate. It also provides an overview of the results of the 2016 presidential primary elections in North Carolina. Donald Trump won the Republican primary and Hillary Clinton won the Democratic primary.
This document provides information on candidates running for federal and state office in North Carolina in 2016. It lists the candidate's name, party affiliation, county, occupation, contact information including phone numbers and websites. Federal offices included are US Senate, US House of Representatives, and state offices listed are Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, State Auditor, and Treasurer. For each office, all identified candidates from the Democratic, Republican, Libertarian and Independent parties are provided.
This document provides an overview and analysis of North Carolina's 2014 election results and insights into the state's 2016 primary and general elections. It summarizes voter trends in urban and rural areas, highlights key congressional and state legislative races, and examines factors like generation gaps and population shifts that could impact upcoming elections. Non-partisan group NCFEF conducted the research to impartially analyze NC's political landscape.
The NCFEF Conventional Voting Behavior (CVB) rating is derived using actual election results from every statewide race since 2008 in which candidates ran on a partisan basis. Election result tabulations were made for every legislative district (13 Congressional districts, and 120 House and 50 Senate districts for the NC General Assembly) and done in a way to ensure split precinct data was assigned to the correct district.
North Carolina's population has grown significantly from 5.1 million in 1970 to over 10 million in 2015, and it is projected to continue growing. Most of the future population growth is expected in Wake and Mecklenburg counties. One-third of North Carolina's counties are projected to lose population. The state has experienced a net migration gain of over 2.2 million people since 1990, especially among younger age groups. By 2020, millennials are expected to make up 31% of the population, and baby boomers 20%. The Hispanic population in North Carolina is growing, with over half of the Hispanic population under age 18.
The document discusses several factors influencing political landscapes and elections, including population growth, urbanization, changing voter attitudes/demographics, outside money, and the rise of millennials. It then provides data on changes to various state legislative districts in North Carolina based on redistricting, listing the incumbent representatives, their party affiliation, the percentage change in each district's partisan lean, and a classification of each district as being more competitive, leaning Democratic or Republican, or solidly partisan.
The document summarizes results from the 2014 North Carolina elections. It shows that Republicans gained control of both chambers of the state legislature. In the US Senate race, Thom Tillis defeated incumbent Kay Hagan. Most statewide races and congressional races were won by Republicans. Maps show county-by-county results and the partisan leanings of state legislative districts following the election. The summary discusses open seat races in competitive districts and races that were close.
This document provides cash on hand totals for various North Carolina political candidates as of the second and third quarters of 2014. It lists totals for US Senate, US House, NC Senate, and NC House races. Notes indicate that red numbers are from the third quarter report and black numbers are from the second quarter report. Candidates are listed with their cash on hand amount and occupation/role.
North Carolina is one of the fastest growing states in America. The steady growth in population for North Carolina means that North Carolina's political landscape and electorate are rapidly changing and understanding these demographics is imperative to understanding North Carolina's evolving political future.
"Outside Spending" is nothing new to American politics. This presentation, compiled by the North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation, is a historical analysis of the different types of outside groups and their spending.
Presentation on shifts in voter attitudes over the past two decades and how increasing urbanization and diversification of our state's population are changing the political landscape in North Carolina.
This document contains maps and information about the conventional voting behavior (CVB) ratings for North Carolina's 13 congressional districts, 50 state senate districts, and 120 state house districts based on election results since 2008. The CVB ratings categorize districts as strong Democrat, lean Democrat, competitive, lean Republican, or strong Republican based on the partisan performance advantage in recent statewide elections. Additional information is provided on the CVB methodology which analyzes election results from every statewide race to determine the degree to which voters in each district have historically favored Republican or Democratic candidates.
Just as important as who is running for office in North Carolina is which incumbents are not. Find out who has resigned, is retiring, running for other office, or otherwise leaving their position in North Carolina politics with the NCFEF’s Turnover Tracker.
The North Carolina FreeEnterprise will track monthly publicly released polling and compile them in aggregated format to see shifts in voter attitudes as it related to North Carolina politics. The polling we will be tracking is listed below, please click on link to see the last trends.
Well before the official candidate filing period begins, the NC FreeEnterprise Foundation compiles and maintains one of the most comprehensive lists of candidates and would-be candidates in the state. Stay up-do-date on who is running and who is not through the NCFEF’s Election Tracker by clicking below.
More from North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation (20)
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu BiographyVoterMood
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxPragencyuk
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
2. 2011-2012 PAC Analysis Introduction
Labor Day marks the official end of summer, so for those involved with a North Carolina
PAC it is time to put away the seersucker and sundresses and get out the checkbook as
campaign fundraising season officially begins.
As the onslaught of fundraising calls from politicians seeking campaign contributions for
the 2014 election cycle begins, the North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation is pleased
to release the 2011-2012 North Carolina Political Action Committee (PAC) Analysis and
Breakdown.
The state PACs analyzed for this report represent hundreds of individuals from all across
the state. These are farmers and urbanites, government employees, entrepreneurs,
business owners and company employees – citizens of all partisan stripes and political
beliefs. A PAC may represent economic interests, labor unions or a particular ideology,
but they all rely on the donations from individuals who want to have a voice in the
democratic process.
The major take-away from our analysis of this data: the impact of North Carolina’s
continued population growth has prompted increases in overall PAC giving, and the
changing political demography from that growth is reflected in PAC giving that accounts
for the seismic shift in the partisan balance of power in state government.
In 2011-2012, the sum total contributions from all state PAC donations equaled
$12,277,415. This is a 9.7% increase from the 2009-2010 election cycle. The old
adage that political contributions tend to follow power is evidenced in the partisan
breakdown: Republican candidates received 72% of all PAC contributions as compared to
44% in 2009-2010.
This report is compiled from the North Carolina State Board of Election based on the
reported and searchable contributions from PACs to political parties and state level
candidates.
4. Democratic $3,438,265
Governor $258,320
Lt. Governor $81,500
Council of State $286,691
House $1,318,588
Senate $923,967
Party $569,200
Governor
8%
Lt. Governor
2%
Council of State
8%
House
38%
Senate
27%
Party
17%
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
5. Republican $8,839,150
Governor $566,161
Lt. Governor $68,500
Council of State $96,675
House $4,290,818
Senate $3,379,066
Party $437,930
Governor
6%
Lt.
Governor
1%
Council
of
State
1%
House
49%
Senate
38%
Party
5%
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
6. North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
Rank PAC Name Amount
1 Advocates For Justice $449,750.00
2 Nationwide Insurance $335,500.00
3 NC Hospital Association $327,750.00
4 Eastern Band of Cherokee $327,000.00
5 NC Farm Bureau $320,450.00
6 NC Realtors $317,850.00
7 NC Medical Society $314,250.00
8 Duke Energy $311,250.00
9 NC Dental Society $246,360.97
10 NC Association of Electric Cooperatives $245,550.00
11 BB&T $221,000.00
12 Bank of America $220,750.00
13 State Farm (NCSFAA PAC) $206,250.00
14 NC Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association $202,800.00
15 McGuireWoods $198,750.00
16 NC Home Builders Association $193,425.00
17 Blue Cross & Blue Shield of NC $184,900.00
18 NC Auto Dealers Association $171,500.00
19 Lillian's List $165,000.00
20 NC Health Care Facilities Association $161,000.00
21 NC Small Business (Independent Insurance Agents) $146,500.00
22 International Brotherhood of Teamsters (DRIVE) $141,500.00
23 First Citizens Bank $130,000.00
24 Time Warner Cable $121,700.00
25 NC Restaurant & Lodging Association $117,750.00
26 Health Network Solutions (Chiropractic PAC) $116,750.00
27 AT&T $116,100.00
28 OrthoCarolina $116,000.00
29 NC Pork Council $113,750.00
30 United Food and Commercial Works $106,500.00
31 National Educators Association Fund (Parent of NCAE) $104,000.00
32 Piedmont Triad Anesthesia $100,500.00
33 Petroleum & Convenience Marketers $100,250.00
34 NC Association of Nurse Anesthetists $98,650.00
35 John Deere $97,000.00
36 CenturyLink $96,500.00
37 Metrolina Area Radiologists $94,000.00
38 Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough $91,500.00
39 NC Bankers Association $90,150.00
40 Carolina Asphalt Pavement Association $88,000.00
7. North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
Rank PAC Name Amount
41 Citizens For Higher Education $87,000.00
42 Alliance For Access To Dental Care $85,000.00
43 Coca-Cola Consolidated $83,750.00
44 Wells Fargo $82,750.00
45 Piedmont Natural Gas $82,095.00
46 Carolina Link Telephone Cooperative $81,000.00
47 Eli Lilly $80,000.00
48 Carolinas Healthcare System $79,000.00
49 Resident Lenders PAC $73,350.00
50 Lowe's $73,250.00
51 PSNC Energy $72,000.00
52 Reynolds American $72,000.00
53 NC Chamber of Commerce $69,500.00
54 NCAE $68,600.00
55 Eastern Radiological Association $65,500.00
56 University Development Coalition $63,500.00
57 JM Family Enterprises $62,250.00
58 American Anesthesiology of NC $58,000.00
59 Committee To Elect Republican Women $58,000.00
60 PepsiCo $57,750.00
61 Capital Area Radiological Association $57,500.00
62 CSX $57,000.00
63 Lorillard Tobacco Company $54,000.00
64 NC Outdoor Advertising Association $54,000.00
65 NC Chiropractic Association $53,850.00
66 NC State Optometric Society $53,850.00
67 State Employees Associations of North Carolina $53,750.00
68 Triangle Orthopedic Association $53,250.00
69 Piedmont Radiologists $53,000.00
70 Ward and Smith $53,000.00
71 Norfolk Southern $52,800.00
72 Mereck $52,000.00
73 Carolina AGC (NC Constructions PAC) $51,900.00
74 Dominion Power $51,800.00
75 Pfizer $49,000.00
76 Wake Emergency Physicians $49,000.00
77 Enterprise Holdings (Enterprise Rent-A-Car) $47,000.00
78 Northeast Anesthesia & Pain Specialist $46,500.00
79 Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein $46,448.11
80 NC Credit Union League $45,350.00
8. North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
Rank PAC Name Amount
81 Friends of Forestry (NC Forestry Association) $45,100.00
82 General Electric $45,000.00
83 Presbyterian Anesthesia Association $44,500.00
84 Smithfield Foods $44,000.00
85 Planned Parenthood of Central NC $40,750.00
86 NC Bail Agents Association $39,800.00
87 Southeastern Radiology $39,000.00
88 Engineers PAC of NC $38,700.00
89 East Carolina Anesthesia $38,500.00
90 NC Dermatology Association $38,000.00
91 NC Association of Insurance & Financial Advisors $37,950.00
92 Abbott Laboratories $37,750.00
93 Liberty Mutual Insurance $34,279.71
94 Wal-Mart $34,250.00
95 Western Radiologists & Surgeons $33,500.00
96 NC Trucking Association $33,250.00
97 Partners For Educational Freedom $33,100.00
98 Central Carolina Radiologist $33,000.00
99 Associated Builders & Contractors (ABC) $32,000.00
100 NC Society of Eye Physicians & Surgeons $31,500.00
101 Equality NC (Action Fund) $30,750.00
102 UnitedHealth Group $30,000.00
103 Association For Home & Hospice Care of NC $29,950.00
104 Corning Inc. $28,500.00
105 Greater Hickory Anesthesiologists $28,000.00
106 Koch Industries $28,000.00
107 NC Association of Health Underwriters $28,000.00
108 Caremark $27,000.00
109 NC Orthopedic Association $27,000.00
110 Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice $26,829.69
111 Mid-Atlantic Emergency Medical Association $26,500.00
112 Amerigroup Corp $26,000.00
113 NC Retail Merchants $25,750.00
114 NC College of Emergency Physicians $24,250.00
115 ECEPac (Emergency Physicians & Administrators) $24,000.00
116 NC Association of CPA $24,000.00
117 Alex Lee $23,500.00
118 Raleigh Orthopedic Clinic $23,250.00
119 NC Association of Long Term Care $22,987.76
120 NC Propane Gas Association $22,750.00
9. North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
Rank PAC Name Amount
121 International Paper $22,500.00
122 Genworth Financial $22,000.00
123 K&L Gates $22,000.00
124 Zeneca Inc. $22,000.00
125 Kerr Drug $21,940.00
126 Anesthesiologist of the Triad $21,500.00
127 NC Academy of Family Physicians $21,500.00
128 Security Finance Corp of Spartanburg & Affiliates $21,500.00
129 Caterpillar $20,000.00
130 Medco Health Solutions $20,000.00
131 Piedmont Stone Center $19,500.00
132 Southeast Anesthesia Association $19,000.00
133 Mecklenburg County Medical Society $18,750.00
134 United Furniture Industries of NC $18,000.00
135 United Transportation $18,000.00
136 Association of Manufactured & Modular Homebuilders $17,750.00
137 FMR LLC (Fidelity) $17,750.00
138 Blue Ridge Bone & Joint $17,500.00
139 Waste Management $17,500.00
140 NC Sierra Club $17,000.00
141 Triad Radiologist $17,000.00
142 Wilmington Anesthesiologist $17,000.00
143 Novartis $16,500.00
144 Carolina Mountain Emergency Medicine $16,200.00
145 Green Industry Council $16,050.00
146 Weyerhaeuser Company $16,000.00
147 NC Assisted Living Association $15,650.00
148 Monsanto Company $15,000.00
149 NC Veterinary Medical Association $15,000.00
150 Asheville Anesthesia Association $14,500.00
151 Microsoft $14,500.00
152 Carolina Ready Mix Concrete $14,000.00
153 Citizens for Healthcare $14,000.00
154 Island Preservation Society $14,000.00
155 United Auto Workers NC (UAW) $14,000.00
156 Electricities $12,500.00
157 NC Poultry Federation $11,950.00
158 Apartment Association of NC $11,750.00
159 Syngenta Corporation $11,250.00
160 Erie Insurance $11,000.00
10. North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
Rank PAC Name Amount
161 NC Land Title Association $11,000.00
162 Universal Leaf Tobacco Company $11,000.00
163 Vulcan Materials $10,200.00
164 Bayada Nurses Healthcare $10,000.00
165 NC Nurse Ambassadors $10,000.00
166 Sprint Nextel $10,000.00
167 NC Indian American $9,501.00
168 BP Corporation $9,500.00
169 Committee for a Healthier Piedmont $9,209.17
170 Manufacturers & Chemical Industry Council of NC $9,200.00
171 Triad Good Government PAC $9,100.00
172 Kindred Healthcare $9,000.00
173 Real Estate & Building Industry Coalition $9,000.00
174 United Health Services of NC $9,000.00
175 Verizon Wireless $9,000.00
176 Delhaize America (Food Lion) $8,250.00
177 Vandeventer Black $8,100.00
178 Altria Group $8,000.00
179 International Association of Fire Fighters $8,000.00
180 American Express $7,500.00
181 Baxter Healthcare $7,500.00
182 DuPont $7,500.00
183 NC Chapter American Institure of Architects $7,500.00
184 Astellas Pharma $7,250.00
185 NC OB & GYN Association $7,000.00
186 Timkin Company $7,000.00
187 Allstate Insurance $6,750.00
188 NC Nurse Practitioners (NP PAC) $6,750.00
189 Carolina Anesthesiology $6,500.00
190 Property Casualty Insurers Association $6,500.00
191 Bayer CropScience $6,400.00
192 ResCare $6,150.00
193 AECOM $6,000.00
194 Aqua America $6,000.00
195 CitiGroup $6,000.00
196 Citizens For A Better Eastern NC $6,000.00
197 NC League of Conservation Voters $6,000.00
198 Woolpart Inc. $6,000.00
199 Bristol Myers Squibb $5,750.00
200 Communications Workers of America (COPE) $5,500.00
12. Business $7,083,624
Democratic $1,507,570
Governor $133,550
Lt. Governor $6,750
Council of State $142,640
Senate $526,630
House $585,250
Party $112,750
Republican $5,576,054
Governor $348,750
Lt. Governor $48,050
Council of State $88,350
Senate $2,197,000
House $2,654,309
Party $239,595
$0
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
Governor Lt.
Governor
Council of
State
Senate House Party
Democrat Republican
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
13. Education $183,600
Democratic $38,350
Governor $0
Lt. Governor $0
Council of State $0
Senate $18,600
House $15,750
Party $4,000
Republican $145,250
Governor $0
Lt. Governor $0
Council of State $0
Senate $70,750
House $70,500
Party $4,000
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
$90,000
Governor Lt.
Governor
Council of
State
Senate House Party
Democrat Republican
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
14. $0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
Governor Lt.
Governor
Council of
State
Senate House Party
Democrat Republican
Environmental $23,000
Democratic $21,500
Governor $0
Lt. Governor $500
Council of State $0
Senate $5,500
House $14,500
Party $1,000
Republican $1,500
Governor $0
Lt. Governor $0
Council of State $0
Senate $0
House $1,500
Party $0
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
15. Healthcare $3,003,663
Democratic $601,250
Governor $37,500
Lt. Governor $1,500
Council of State $68,150
Senate $192,450
House $277,250
Party $24,400
Republican $2,402,413
Governor $163,038
Lt. Governor $10,000
Council of State $2,750
Senate $905,216
House $1,258,959
Party $62,450
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
Governor Lt.
Governor
Council of
State
Senate House Party
Democrat Republican
16. Ideological $311,850
Democratic $244,100
Governor $14,500
Lt. Governor $18,000
Council of State $20,000
Senate $38,750
House $148,850
Party $4,000
Republican $67,750
Governor $1,500
Lt. Governor $500
Council of State $4,000
Senate $6,500
House $52,250
Party $3,000
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
Governor Lt.
Governor
Council of
State
Senate House Party
Democrat Republican
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
17. Labor $528,300
Democratic $501,475
Governor $28,500
Lt. Governor $47,750
Council of State $7,000
Senate $37,988
House $55,238
Party $325,000
Republican $26,825
Governor $0
Lt. Governor $0
Council of State $75
Senate $11,000
House $8,250
Party $7,500
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
$350,000
Governor Lt.
Governor
Council of
State
Senate House Party
Democrat Republican
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
18. Other $364,201
Democratic $152,251
Governor $6,500
Lt. Governor $2,000
Council of State $13,201
Senate $17,250
House $40,300
Party $73,000
Republican $211,950
Governor $9,500
Lt. Governor $0
Council of State $500
Senate $45,750
House $56,200
Party $100,000
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
$160,000
$180,000
Governor Lt.
Governor
Council of
State
Senate House Party
Democrat Republican
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
19. Plaintiff Attorneys $449,750
Democratic $294,500
Governor $10,250
Lt. Governor $4,000
Council of State $24,000
Senate $77,000
House $158,750
Party $20,500
Republican $155,250
Governor $0
Lt. Governor $4,000
Council of State $500
Senate $57,000
House $79,750
Party $14,000
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
Governor Lt.
Governor
Council of
State
Senate House Party
Democrat Republican
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
20. Professional $297,828
Democratic $70,420
Governor $21,520
Lt. Governor $1,000
Council of State $11,450
Senate $15,050
House $16,850
Party $4,550
Republican $227,408
Governor $33,373
Lt. Governor $5,950
Council of State $500
Senate $81,350
House $101,350
Party $4,885
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
Governor Lt.
Governor
Council of
State
Senate House Party
Democrat Republican
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
21. Regional $31,600
Democratic $6,600
Governor $6,000
Lt. Governor $0
Council of State $250
Senate $250
House $100
Party $0
Republican $25,000
Governor $10,000
Lt. Governor $0
Council of State $0
Senate $7,500
House $5,000
Party $2,500
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
Governor Lt.
Governor
Council of
State
Senate House Party
Democrat Republican
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
25. Phil Berger* $548,400
Tom Apodaca* $360,455
Bob Rucho* $281,450
Harry Brown* $225,100
Pete Brunstetter* $197,100
Neal Hunt* $157,000
Fletcher Hartsell* $121,450
Wesley Meredith* $105,650
Bill Rabon* $102,000
Jerry Tillman* $101,850
Brent Jackson* $99,150
Ralph Hise* $97,600
Buck Newton* $83,600
Thom Goolsby* $82,750
Warren Daniel* $70,750
Stan Bingham* $69,500
Andrew Brock* $68,550
Rick Gunn* $66,700
Kathy Harrington* $62,250
Louis Pate* $61,050
Don East $54,400
Tamara Barringer* $51,950
Tommy Tucker* $43,000
Richard Stevens $37,500
Jim Davis* $35,611
Dan Soucek* $35,500
Austin Allran* $30,650
Jeff Tarte* $21,750
Chad Barefoot* $19,700
Chris Carney $13,250
David Rouzer $13,000
David Curtis $10,800
Bill Cook* $7,350
Norm Sanderson* $7,150
Ronald Rabin* $6,200
Trudy Wade* $4,350
Jerry Evans $4,000
Troy Stafford $4,000
Randy Ramsey $3,000
Jean Preston $2,700
Jim Forrester $2,500
John Aneralla $2,000
Shirley Randleman* $2,000
Harris Blake* $1,500
Justin Conrad $1,000
Karen Ray $1,000
Glen Bradley $500
Gene McIntyre* $350
*Denotes General Election candidate
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
26. Martin Nesbitt* $156,150
Josh Stein* $88,550
Clark Jenkins* $84,200
Michael Walters* $76,850
Dan Blue* $76,550
Dan Clodfelter* $74,100
Stan White* $39,900
Floyd McKissick* $38,200
Gene McLaurin* $35,500
Eric Mansfield $28,200
Doug Berger* $26,650
Earline Parmon* $24,800
Malcolm Graham* $24,450
Ed Jones* $23,380
Joel Ford* $17,500
Gladys Robinson* $16,600
Deb Butler* $16,500
John Snow* $16,000
Don Davis* $8,050
Kerry Sutton $8,000
Mike Woodard* $6,000
Ellie Kinnaird* $5,250
Billy King $4,500
Brad Salmon $4,000
Bill Purcell $3,250
Bob Atwater $2,950
John McDevitt* $2,750
Erv Portman* $2,338
Linda Garrou $2,000
Don Vaughan $1,750
Phil Feagan $1,500
George Tatum* $1,000
Larry Shaw $1,000
Myra Sloane $1,000
Sig Hutchinson * $1,000
Tony Moore $1,000
Ben Clark $800
Jack Flynn $500
James Taylor $250
*Denotes General Election candidate
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
27. Thom Tillis* $578,750
Ruth Samuelson* $242,959
Paul Stam* $194,250
Julia Howard* $184,550
Tom Murry* $169,850
Nelson Dollar* $169,400
Tim Moore* $159,150
Justin Burr* $158,850
Marilyn Avila* $149,500
David Lewis* $144,600
Mitch Gillespie* $126,534
Jerry Dockham* $125,000
Harold Brubaker $121,950
Mike Hager* $112,900
Tim Moffitt* $93,000
Mark Hollo* $85,950
Jeff Collins* $66,300
Edgar Starnes* $64,600
Bill Brawley* $62,300
Jim Fulghum* $62,200
Linda Johnson* $51,150
Leo Daughtry* $51,000
Hugh Blackwell* $49,850
Roger West* $44,650
Mitchell Setzer* $36,800
Kelly Hastings* $35,900
Pat McElraft* $31,250
Bert Jones* $29,350
Mike Stone* $28,700
Sarah Stevens* $28,400
Jamie Boles* $27,900
Bryan Holloway* $27,500
Fred Steen $26,750
Jonathan Jordan* $26,700
Nathan Ramsey* $26,600
Danny McComas $26,100
Pat Hurley* $25,850
Susan Martin* $25,650
Rob Bryan* $25,350
Harry Warren* $24,200
John Torbett* $23,150
Rick Catlin* $22,350
Dale Folwell $21,850
Frank Iler* $20,600
John Blust* $20,350
Andy Wells* $18,150
Chuck McGrady* $18,100
Donny Lambeth* $18,000
Ted Davis* $17,425
Rayne Brown* $17,300
John Faircloth* $14,750
Jeff Barnhart $14,700
Debra Conrad* $14,550
Jimmy Dixon* $14,500
J.H. Langdon* $14,100
John Szoka* $13,550
Trudi Walend $13,350
Jason Saine* $13,300
*Denotes General Election candidate
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
28. Stephen LaRoque $12,850
Steve Ross* $12,100
Craig Horn* $11,100
Charles Jeter* $10,400
John Bell* $10,300
G.L. Pridgen* $9,300
Jay White $8,750
Phil Shepard* $8,500
Darrell McCormick $8,100
Bob Steinburg* $7,950
Michael Speciale* $7,450
Robert Brawley* $6,950
Chris Malone* $6,800
Ric Killian $6,150
Allen McNeill* $6,050
Jeff Elmore* $5,850
Glenn Cobb $5,750
Carl Ford* $5,500
Johnathan Rhyne $5,500
Jon Hardister* $5,500
Cathy Wright* $5,250
Dean Arp* $5,250
Chris Whitmire* $5,200
Dennis Riddell* $5,150
Michele Presnell* $4,800
Rena Turner* $4,800
Richard Johnson $4,750
Wil Neumann $4,750
Efton Sager $4,650
Charlton Allen $4,000
Christy Jones $4,000
Jacqueline Schaffer* $4,000
Grey Mills $3,750
Bill Cook $3,500
Dana Bumgardner* $3,500
Mark Hilton $3,200
Chris Millis* $3,000
Frank Mitchell $2,500
Larry Brown $2,350
George Cleveland* $2,200
Brian Brown* $2,100
Mark Brody* $2,000
Arthur Williams $1,750
David Guice $1,500
Ken Gjertsen $1,500
Larry Pittman* $1,350
Mike Clampitt* $1,250
Diane Wheatley $1,000
Bill McGee $700
Dan Ingle $700
Donnie Loftis $500
Eric Troyer $500
Jeff Gerber $500
Jim Dancy $500
Norm Sanderson $500
Shirley Randleman $500
Tom Keigher $200
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
*Denotes General Election candidate
29. Susi Hamilton* $81,200
Michael Wray* $78,300
Bill Brisson* $74,900
Rick Glazier* $71,450
Marian McLawhorn* $53,400
Winkie Wilkins* $47,400
Darren Jackson* $46,050
Becky Carney* $39,100
Jim Crawford $39,100
Ken Goodman* $35,550
Marcus Brandon* $33,000
Larry Hall* $32,550
William Wainwright $31,750
Deborah Ross* $31,200
Joe Tolson* $30,500
Kelly Alexander* $29,450
Joe Hackney $27,350
Tricia Cotham* $25,600
Susan Wilson* $23,900
Rodney Moore * $21,300
Angela Bryant* $21,200
Jane Whilden* $20,750
Deb McManus* $19,625
Martha Alexander* $18,800
Paul Tine* $18,100
Marvin Lucas* $17,500
Alma Adams* $17,450
Mickey Michaux* $16,700
Rosa Gill* $15,600
Ray Rapp* $15,000
Patty Philipps* $13,425
Garland Pierce* $13,400
Nathan Baskerville* $12,250
Valerie Foushee* $12,250
Lori Millberg* $11,588
Annie Mobley* $11,250
Beverly Earle* $11,250
Matt Dixon $11,000
Larry Bell* $9,800
Robin Bradford* $9,500
Carla Cunningham* $9,000
Mark Bibbs* $8,850
Susan Fisher $8,650
Eddie Dees* $8,050
Yvonne Holley* $8,000
Jim Messina $6,800
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
*Denotes General Election candidate
30. Evelyn Terry $6,750
Nelson Cole* $6,350
Charles Graham* $6,000
Danny Davis $6,000
Jean Farmer-Butterfield* $5,750
Elmer Floyd* $5,600
Diane Parfitt $5,500
Dollie Burwell $5,500
Ken Waddell* $5,100
Keith Karlsson* $5,000
Verla Insko* $4,650
Jim Crawford III $4,500
Ed Hanes* $4,000
Jan Mills* $4,000
Lisa Baker* $4,000
Cullie Tarleton* $3,750
Duane Hall* $3,750
George Graham* $3,700
Paul Luebke* $2,500
Phil Haire $2,500
William Osborne* $2,500
Al Jack Leonard $2,000
Robert Cayton* $2,000
Grier Martin $1,900
Dewey Hill $1,750
Joe Sam Queen* $1,750
Abeni El-Amin $1,500
Bill Tatum* $1,500
Tom Gale* $1,250
Bill Faison $1,000
Pryor Gibson $1,000
Edith Warren $900
Bill Luton* $750
Bill Owens $750
Dale Nelson $750
Jason Wunsch* $750
Bill Batterman* $500
Everette Witherspoon* $500
Jeff Starkweather $500
Pricey Harrison* $500
Ron Weatherford $500
Tim Spear $500
Patsey Keever $400
Jennifer Weiss $250
Maggie Jeffus $150
North Carolina FreeEnterprise Foundation ● www.ncfef.org ● 2011-2012 PAC Analysis & Breakdown
*Denotes General Election candidate
31. ☐
Yes,
we
will
support
the
research
and
analysis
work
done
by
the
North
Carolina
FreeEnterprise
Foundation
with
a
charitable
contribution
of:
☐
Leadership
Circle
-‐
$5,000
☐
Partners
-‐
$2,500
☐
Sustainers
-‐
$1,000
☐
Supporters
-‐
$500
☐
Other:
$________________________
☐
Enclosed
is
a
check
payable
to
the
NC
FreeEnterprise
Foundation.
☐
Please
send
an
invoice
for
the
above
amount.
☐
Please
charge
this
contribution
to
☐Mastercard
☐Visa
☐American
Express:
Card
number
Exp
Date
V
code
Name
on
card
Billing
address
City/State/Zip
I
hereby
authorized
the
above
charge
in
the
amount
noted
above:
Signature
__________________________________________________________
Date
__________________
Organization/Business
Contact
person
Address
City,
State,
Zip
Office
Phone
Mobile
Phone
E-‐mail
☐
Also,
please
contact
me
regarding
NCFEF
sponsorship
opportunities.
NC
FreeEnterprise
Foundation
PO
Box
12406
Raleigh,
NC
27605-‐2406
Phone:
(919)
896-8347
Fax:
(919)
896-8349
E-mail:
admin@ncfef.org
www.ncfef.org