Offences Against Law of Nations, Genocide, Slavery, War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity, Treason, Discrimination, Racketeering Influence Corruption Organized Crime, Breach of Trust, Breach of Contract and Fraud Against the Black, Brown, Coppertone Aboriginals of The United States of North America.
The Royal International Court of Justice discusses three types of United States mentioned in historical documents and laws: 1) The United States of North America, the original sovereign government established by indigenous peoples; 2) The Federal Government, established as a colonial administrative body by the Constitution; and 3) State Governments with republican authority. The Court examines documents showing how the USNA was the supreme sovereign nation prior to British colonization, and that the 1776 Declaration pronounced the resurgence of the USNA as an autonomous sovereign nation, distinct from the British colonies. The purpose is to clarify which entity has authority over citizenship and property rights based on the original sovereign nation.
This document discusses the status of Aboriginal/Native Americans as nationals of the United States of North America rather than citizens of the United States. It argues that the US government is a colonial corporate entity that went bankrupt in 1933, while the USNA is the sovereign general government formed by the union of states. As nationals of USNA, Aboriginal Americans owe no allegiance to the US government and were not affected by its bankruptcy. The document distinguishes between the constitutional Congress of the USNA and the current non-constitutional US Congress comprised of civil service employees.
This document announces that Black Aboriginals of North America are taking back their sovereign governments. It declares that the original people of North America have unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and the right to alter or abolish any government that infringes on these rights. It asserts that the United States government is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations against the original sovereign nations and peoples of North America. It proclaims the reclamation of the pre-entitled, natural born citizenship of the original people by the Grandfather, Old Ones, Ancient People, and Spiritual People of North America under the Republic of North America.
The document compares the original United States government structure outlined in the Constitution to the current administrative federal government structure. It lists 17 points of comparison between the two, such as the difference between a national citizen and an alien, a president of the general national government versus the corporate national government, and common law versus statutory law. The document suggests the current federal government has shifted away from the original republican form of government established by the Constitution to a de facto administrative system.
This document discusses the history and structure of different levels of government in the United States. It describes the original form of government with counties controlling local jurisdictions and states controlling their territories. It then explains how after the Civil War, foreign subcontractors took over aspects of the federal government and established corporate entities in an effort to undermine the sovereignty of the states and citizens. The document argues this was done through semantic deception and without proper notification or consent. It maintains the true governments of the United States and individual states have been incapacitated but efforts are underway to reconstruct the legitimate constitutional framework.
Pre-Study Materials for Constitutional Enforcement SeminarICJ-ICC
This document provides an overview of the constitutional framework of government in the United States, both historically and presently. It describes how: (1) Local and state governments were originally intended to control jurisdictions within the country, while the federal government's role was limited to certain delegated powers; (2) After the Civil War, foreign subcontractors like Britain usurped power and replaced the legitimate state and federal governments with private corporate entities; (3) This led to confusion over citizenship and jurisdiction that allowed these corporations to unlawfully target Americans. It asserts that average Americans have a duty as members of militia to uphold the true constitutional guarantees against such abuses of power.
1. The document outlines the historical governmental structures of the United States, including the Confederation of states from 1781-1860, the Federal Republic, and the unincorporated Federation of States doing business as the United States of North America.
2. It notes that when the Confederation ceased functioning in 1860 due to the Civil War, the powers returned to the Federation by law, but the Federation was not reconvened to reconstruct the government.
3. The document claims that private foreign interests like the "Scottish Bunko Artists" impersonated and replaced the Federation with incorporated commercial entities like "The United States of America," defrauding the American people and government.
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 forced the relocation of Native American tribes living east of the Mississippi River to lands west of the river. This opened up millions of acres of land for white settlement but caused immense suffering for Native Americans forced to relocate. Under the act, nearly all relocations were carried out under duress through military escorts, broken treaties, or when tribes had no other option after being decimated. The removal process devastated many tribes and disrupted Native American homelands and cultures in what is now Kansas.
The Royal International Court of Justice discusses three types of United States mentioned in historical documents and laws: 1) The United States of North America, the original sovereign government established by indigenous peoples; 2) The Federal Government, established as a colonial administrative body by the Constitution; and 3) State Governments with republican authority. The Court examines documents showing how the USNA was the supreme sovereign nation prior to British colonization, and that the 1776 Declaration pronounced the resurgence of the USNA as an autonomous sovereign nation, distinct from the British colonies. The purpose is to clarify which entity has authority over citizenship and property rights based on the original sovereign nation.
This document discusses the status of Aboriginal/Native Americans as nationals of the United States of North America rather than citizens of the United States. It argues that the US government is a colonial corporate entity that went bankrupt in 1933, while the USNA is the sovereign general government formed by the union of states. As nationals of USNA, Aboriginal Americans owe no allegiance to the US government and were not affected by its bankruptcy. The document distinguishes between the constitutional Congress of the USNA and the current non-constitutional US Congress comprised of civil service employees.
This document announces that Black Aboriginals of North America are taking back their sovereign governments. It declares that the original people of North America have unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and the right to alter or abolish any government that infringes on these rights. It asserts that the United States government is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations against the original sovereign nations and peoples of North America. It proclaims the reclamation of the pre-entitled, natural born citizenship of the original people by the Grandfather, Old Ones, Ancient People, and Spiritual People of North America under the Republic of North America.
The document compares the original United States government structure outlined in the Constitution to the current administrative federal government structure. It lists 17 points of comparison between the two, such as the difference between a national citizen and an alien, a president of the general national government versus the corporate national government, and common law versus statutory law. The document suggests the current federal government has shifted away from the original republican form of government established by the Constitution to a de facto administrative system.
This document discusses the history and structure of different levels of government in the United States. It describes the original form of government with counties controlling local jurisdictions and states controlling their territories. It then explains how after the Civil War, foreign subcontractors took over aspects of the federal government and established corporate entities in an effort to undermine the sovereignty of the states and citizens. The document argues this was done through semantic deception and without proper notification or consent. It maintains the true governments of the United States and individual states have been incapacitated but efforts are underway to reconstruct the legitimate constitutional framework.
Pre-Study Materials for Constitutional Enforcement SeminarICJ-ICC
This document provides an overview of the constitutional framework of government in the United States, both historically and presently. It describes how: (1) Local and state governments were originally intended to control jurisdictions within the country, while the federal government's role was limited to certain delegated powers; (2) After the Civil War, foreign subcontractors like Britain usurped power and replaced the legitimate state and federal governments with private corporate entities; (3) This led to confusion over citizenship and jurisdiction that allowed these corporations to unlawfully target Americans. It asserts that average Americans have a duty as members of militia to uphold the true constitutional guarantees against such abuses of power.
1. The document outlines the historical governmental structures of the United States, including the Confederation of states from 1781-1860, the Federal Republic, and the unincorporated Federation of States doing business as the United States of North America.
2. It notes that when the Confederation ceased functioning in 1860 due to the Civil War, the powers returned to the Federation by law, but the Federation was not reconvened to reconstruct the government.
3. The document claims that private foreign interests like the "Scottish Bunko Artists" impersonated and replaced the Federation with incorporated commercial entities like "The United States of America," defrauding the American people and government.
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 forced the relocation of Native American tribes living east of the Mississippi River to lands west of the river. This opened up millions of acres of land for white settlement but caused immense suffering for Native Americans forced to relocate. Under the act, nearly all relocations were carried out under duress through military escorts, broken treaties, or when tribes had no other option after being decimated. The removal process devastated many tribes and disrupted Native American homelands and cultures in what is now Kansas.
Soc studies #15 articles of confederationMrsSevCTK
The document summarizes the key events leading up to the drafting and ratification of the Articles of Confederation, which established the first national government of the United States after the American Revolutionary War. It describes the political ideas that influenced the Articles, their provisions, and the difficulties faced under the weak confederation system, including inflation, conflicts between states, and Shays' Rebellion, demonstrating the need for a stronger federal government.
Recent legislation passed in the state of Utah has
demanded that the federal government extinguish title
to certain public lands that the federal government
currently holds. The state of Utah claims that the
federal government made promises to it (at statehood
when the federal government obtained the lands) that
the federal ownership would be of limited duration and
that the bulk of those lands would be timely disposed
of by the federal government into private ownership
or otherwise returned to the state. This White Paper
provides a legal overview of these claims.
The document discusses the president's pardon power as outlined in the Constitution and analyzes whether a president can pardon himself or members of his administration. It examines the framers' intent, English common law origins, Supreme Court precedent, and historical uses of pardons. While no president has tried a self-pardon, scholars debate whether it would be constitutionally permissible or not. A self-pardon could be an admission of guilt but may not preclude impeachment and criminal liability. Presidents have broadly pardoned members of their administration, which raises similar constitutional questions. Ultimately, there is no definitive answer since the Supreme Court has yet to rule on these issues.
The document discusses the creation of the first U.S. Constitution and the replacement of the Articles of Confederation. It describes how the Articles of Confederation created a weak national government that proved ineffective. The Constitutional Convention in 1787 drafted the U.S. Constitution to create a stronger federal government with three branches of power and the ability to make laws binding on the states. After debate, the Constitution was ratified by 11 of the 13 original states and went into effect, replacing the Articles of Confederation as the governing document of the new nation.
This document is a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by the United States of North America. It alleges offenses against international law, including genocide and slavery, committed against the ancient Black aboriginals of North America. It seeks writs of quo warranto, mandamus, and prohibition and names as respondents various US courts and government bodies. It provides lengthy definitions of terms related to governments, nations, and sovereignty.
This document is the introduction to a 1906 treatise on American citizenship by John S. Wise. It provides an overview of the book's purpose and scope. Specifically, it aims to discuss the origin, nature, and obligations of American citizenship at both the national and state levels in a concise textbook for legal professionals and students. The author acknowledges the book may not be perfect but hopes it supplies needed information on this important topic that most Americans have little understanding of.
This document is a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by the United States of North America. It alleges offenses against international law, including genocide and slavery, committed against the ancient Black aboriginals of North America. It seeks writs of quo warranto, mandamus, and prohibition against the respondent parties. It provides definitions for various terms used and introduces the petitioner, the sovereign government of the United States of North America, which claims authority over financial accounts backing the U.S. and global monetary systems.
The document discusses the history of federal control over public lands within states and arguments for transferring those lands to state control. It notes that when new states were admitted to the union, compacts were created to transfer federal public lands within the new states equally to the states. However, vast amounts of land remained under long-term federal control in western states like Oregon. The document argues that this unequal treatment of western states violates the terms of statehood and harms state sovereignty, revenues, and ability to manage resources and growth. It advocates for the transfer of federal public lands to state control on equal terms as the original states and early western states like Illinois that successfully compelled such land transfers.
The state that successfully compelled the transfer of its public lands using these arguments was Nevada. In the late 19th century, Nevada argued for the transfer of federal lands within its borders using reasoning around state sovereignty, unfair restrictions on revenue generation and management compared to eastern states, health and welfare of its citizens, and fulfillment of the terms of its statehood enabling act - ultimately resulting in the transfer of public lands to Nevada's control.
Idaho HCR 22 2013 - Demanding Feds to Extinguish Title to Public LandsAmerican Lands Council
This document is a concurrent resolution from the Idaho state legislature demanding that the federal government extinguish title to Idaho's public lands and transfer title of those lands to the state of Idaho. It provides numerous historical references to establish that the federal government has a trust obligation based on compacts with the original states and Idaho's admission to the union to eventually transfer public lands to the states. It argues that by retaining control over nearly two-thirds of Idaho's land, the federal government has prevented Idaho from properly funding education and managing its resources and economy.
What is Freedom? Reconstruction Chapter 15Heather Powell
The document summarizes key events and terms related to the emancipation of slaves and Reconstruction in the United States after the Civil War. It discusses freed slaves relishing their newfound freedom from regulations, the strengthening of black churches and schools, the challenges faced by former slave owners, and the narrow view of black freedom held by most planters. Key terms and events summarized include the Emancipation Proclamation, the Freedmen's Bureau, Andrew Johnson, sharecropping, the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, and the Ku Klux Klan. Radical Republicans pushed for stronger federal protections of black civil rights during Reconstruction.
The document analyzes several key events and issues related to the rise of sectionalism and the slavery debate in the United States between 1820-1858. This included the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Wilmot Proviso of 1846, the Compromise of 1850 negotiated by Henry Clay, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, the Dred Scott decision of 1857, and the Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858. Each of these issues and events further inflamed regional tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery and its expansion into the western territories.
This document is the preface to a treatise on citizenship in the United States published in 1891. It discusses how citizenship can be acquired through birthright or naturalization. It also examines conflicts that can arise between municipal rules of citizenship and international law. The preface emphasizes the importance of good faith in acquiring and renouncing citizenship to avoid problems between countries. It explores how intent plays a role in determining if naturalized citizens have lost citizenship by returning to their country of birth.
Constitution Day, along with Independence Day and Presidents; Day, is an important part of the cultural heritage of the United States of America, because it recognizes the value of the American experiment, and the success of a nation of free people whose rights and liberties are protected by a written Constitution.
1) Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the Supreme Court's power of judicial review to determine the constitutionality of laws.
2) Fletcher v. Peck (1810) upheld the sanctity of contracts by preventing states from invalidating land sales.
3) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) ruled that states cannot tax the federal government and confirmed the constitutionality of the National Bank.
The document discusses several important events, people, and policies in early 19th century United States history. It describes the establishment of the Bank of the United States in 1791 and its 20-year charter. It also mentions key political figures of the era like John C. Calhoun, Henry Clay, and Daniel Webster. Additionally, it summarizes policies and events such as internal improvements, the Era of Good Feelings, the Panic of 1819, the Rush-Bagot Agreement, the Convention of 1818, the Transcontinental Treaty, the Missouri Compromise, John Marshall's Supreme Court decisions, the Monroe Doctrine, and the Tariff of 1824.
Sam Houston was elected president of the Republic of Texas in 1841 for his second term. He aimed to balance the budget by cutting government jobs and spending, but was unable to do so as debt rose to $12 million by 1845. Houston pursued peaceful relations with Indian tribes, establishing frontier trading posts and signing treaties, including with the Comanche in 1844. However, tensions with the Comanche later resurfaced. Houston also had to send troops in 1844 to end the Regulator-Moderator War, a violent feud between two settler groups in East Texas over land certificates that local officials could not stop.
The document provides definitions and context for key terms and events in American history related to the development of democracy and the US system of government. It includes definitions for types of colonial governments, important documents like the Magna Carta, Continental Congresses, plans and compromises that shaped the Constitution, figures like Franklin and Jefferson, and concepts like separation of powers.
The document summarizes the political battle over Reconstruction in the post-Civil War United States. It describes President Andrew Johnson's lenient reconstruction plan, the passage of the 13th Amendment abolishing slavery, and the black codes passed by Southern states that replaced slavery with laws controlling African Americans. It outlines the Radical Republicans' opposition to Johnson's plan and their efforts to protect freedmen and guarantee black voting rights through acts like the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the 14th and 15th Amendments granting citizenship and suffrage to African Americans. Finally, it discusses Radical Reconstruction, white supremacist violence by groups like the Ku Klux Klan, and the laws passed in response like the Ku Klux Klan Acts
The U.S. Constitution Essay
Essay on US Constitution
The Three Branches
US Constitution Essay
The Us Constitution
The Us Constitution
The US Constitution Essay
Essay on US Constitution
Essay about The Constitution
Reconstruction sought to rebuild the South after the Civil War and integrate freed black slaves into society. There were disagreements over how it should be controlled and how to balance white and black political power. Presidential Reconstruction under Johnson enfranchised ex-Confederates but was resisted by Radical Republicans in Congress who instituted military control over the South and protected black civil rights. Corruption scandals weakened Republican support, and the Compromise of 1877 ended Reconstruction by withdrawing federal troops from the South.
This document discusses the origins and current status of the governments of the United States and Black Americans. It claims that Black Americans were never meant to be citizens or slaves of the colonial US government established by the original 13 states. Instead, Black Americans' true sovereign government was the original confederation of Native American nations that preceded and gave rise to the colonial US. The document argues that today's US federal government is an illegitimate de facto regime that has replaced the original de jure government, and that Black Americans are the true creditors and beneficiaries of the US political system.
Soc studies #15 articles of confederationMrsSevCTK
The document summarizes the key events leading up to the drafting and ratification of the Articles of Confederation, which established the first national government of the United States after the American Revolutionary War. It describes the political ideas that influenced the Articles, their provisions, and the difficulties faced under the weak confederation system, including inflation, conflicts between states, and Shays' Rebellion, demonstrating the need for a stronger federal government.
Recent legislation passed in the state of Utah has
demanded that the federal government extinguish title
to certain public lands that the federal government
currently holds. The state of Utah claims that the
federal government made promises to it (at statehood
when the federal government obtained the lands) that
the federal ownership would be of limited duration and
that the bulk of those lands would be timely disposed
of by the federal government into private ownership
or otherwise returned to the state. This White Paper
provides a legal overview of these claims.
The document discusses the president's pardon power as outlined in the Constitution and analyzes whether a president can pardon himself or members of his administration. It examines the framers' intent, English common law origins, Supreme Court precedent, and historical uses of pardons. While no president has tried a self-pardon, scholars debate whether it would be constitutionally permissible or not. A self-pardon could be an admission of guilt but may not preclude impeachment and criminal liability. Presidents have broadly pardoned members of their administration, which raises similar constitutional questions. Ultimately, there is no definitive answer since the Supreme Court has yet to rule on these issues.
The document discusses the creation of the first U.S. Constitution and the replacement of the Articles of Confederation. It describes how the Articles of Confederation created a weak national government that proved ineffective. The Constitutional Convention in 1787 drafted the U.S. Constitution to create a stronger federal government with three branches of power and the ability to make laws binding on the states. After debate, the Constitution was ratified by 11 of the 13 original states and went into effect, replacing the Articles of Confederation as the governing document of the new nation.
This document is a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by the United States of North America. It alleges offenses against international law, including genocide and slavery, committed against the ancient Black aboriginals of North America. It seeks writs of quo warranto, mandamus, and prohibition and names as respondents various US courts and government bodies. It provides lengthy definitions of terms related to governments, nations, and sovereignty.
This document is the introduction to a 1906 treatise on American citizenship by John S. Wise. It provides an overview of the book's purpose and scope. Specifically, it aims to discuss the origin, nature, and obligations of American citizenship at both the national and state levels in a concise textbook for legal professionals and students. The author acknowledges the book may not be perfect but hopes it supplies needed information on this important topic that most Americans have little understanding of.
This document is a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by the United States of North America. It alleges offenses against international law, including genocide and slavery, committed against the ancient Black aboriginals of North America. It seeks writs of quo warranto, mandamus, and prohibition against the respondent parties. It provides definitions for various terms used and introduces the petitioner, the sovereign government of the United States of North America, which claims authority over financial accounts backing the U.S. and global monetary systems.
The document discusses the history of federal control over public lands within states and arguments for transferring those lands to state control. It notes that when new states were admitted to the union, compacts were created to transfer federal public lands within the new states equally to the states. However, vast amounts of land remained under long-term federal control in western states like Oregon. The document argues that this unequal treatment of western states violates the terms of statehood and harms state sovereignty, revenues, and ability to manage resources and growth. It advocates for the transfer of federal public lands to state control on equal terms as the original states and early western states like Illinois that successfully compelled such land transfers.
The state that successfully compelled the transfer of its public lands using these arguments was Nevada. In the late 19th century, Nevada argued for the transfer of federal lands within its borders using reasoning around state sovereignty, unfair restrictions on revenue generation and management compared to eastern states, health and welfare of its citizens, and fulfillment of the terms of its statehood enabling act - ultimately resulting in the transfer of public lands to Nevada's control.
Idaho HCR 22 2013 - Demanding Feds to Extinguish Title to Public LandsAmerican Lands Council
This document is a concurrent resolution from the Idaho state legislature demanding that the federal government extinguish title to Idaho's public lands and transfer title of those lands to the state of Idaho. It provides numerous historical references to establish that the federal government has a trust obligation based on compacts with the original states and Idaho's admission to the union to eventually transfer public lands to the states. It argues that by retaining control over nearly two-thirds of Idaho's land, the federal government has prevented Idaho from properly funding education and managing its resources and economy.
What is Freedom? Reconstruction Chapter 15Heather Powell
The document summarizes key events and terms related to the emancipation of slaves and Reconstruction in the United States after the Civil War. It discusses freed slaves relishing their newfound freedom from regulations, the strengthening of black churches and schools, the challenges faced by former slave owners, and the narrow view of black freedom held by most planters. Key terms and events summarized include the Emancipation Proclamation, the Freedmen's Bureau, Andrew Johnson, sharecropping, the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, and the Ku Klux Klan. Radical Republicans pushed for stronger federal protections of black civil rights during Reconstruction.
The document analyzes several key events and issues related to the rise of sectionalism and the slavery debate in the United States between 1820-1858. This included the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Wilmot Proviso of 1846, the Compromise of 1850 negotiated by Henry Clay, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, the Dred Scott decision of 1857, and the Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858. Each of these issues and events further inflamed regional tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery and its expansion into the western territories.
This document is the preface to a treatise on citizenship in the United States published in 1891. It discusses how citizenship can be acquired through birthright or naturalization. It also examines conflicts that can arise between municipal rules of citizenship and international law. The preface emphasizes the importance of good faith in acquiring and renouncing citizenship to avoid problems between countries. It explores how intent plays a role in determining if naturalized citizens have lost citizenship by returning to their country of birth.
Constitution Day, along with Independence Day and Presidents; Day, is an important part of the cultural heritage of the United States of America, because it recognizes the value of the American experiment, and the success of a nation of free people whose rights and liberties are protected by a written Constitution.
1) Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the Supreme Court's power of judicial review to determine the constitutionality of laws.
2) Fletcher v. Peck (1810) upheld the sanctity of contracts by preventing states from invalidating land sales.
3) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) ruled that states cannot tax the federal government and confirmed the constitutionality of the National Bank.
The document discusses several important events, people, and policies in early 19th century United States history. It describes the establishment of the Bank of the United States in 1791 and its 20-year charter. It also mentions key political figures of the era like John C. Calhoun, Henry Clay, and Daniel Webster. Additionally, it summarizes policies and events such as internal improvements, the Era of Good Feelings, the Panic of 1819, the Rush-Bagot Agreement, the Convention of 1818, the Transcontinental Treaty, the Missouri Compromise, John Marshall's Supreme Court decisions, the Monroe Doctrine, and the Tariff of 1824.
Sam Houston was elected president of the Republic of Texas in 1841 for his second term. He aimed to balance the budget by cutting government jobs and spending, but was unable to do so as debt rose to $12 million by 1845. Houston pursued peaceful relations with Indian tribes, establishing frontier trading posts and signing treaties, including with the Comanche in 1844. However, tensions with the Comanche later resurfaced. Houston also had to send troops in 1844 to end the Regulator-Moderator War, a violent feud between two settler groups in East Texas over land certificates that local officials could not stop.
The document provides definitions and context for key terms and events in American history related to the development of democracy and the US system of government. It includes definitions for types of colonial governments, important documents like the Magna Carta, Continental Congresses, plans and compromises that shaped the Constitution, figures like Franklin and Jefferson, and concepts like separation of powers.
The document summarizes the political battle over Reconstruction in the post-Civil War United States. It describes President Andrew Johnson's lenient reconstruction plan, the passage of the 13th Amendment abolishing slavery, and the black codes passed by Southern states that replaced slavery with laws controlling African Americans. It outlines the Radical Republicans' opposition to Johnson's plan and their efforts to protect freedmen and guarantee black voting rights through acts like the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the 14th and 15th Amendments granting citizenship and suffrage to African Americans. Finally, it discusses Radical Reconstruction, white supremacist violence by groups like the Ku Klux Klan, and the laws passed in response like the Ku Klux Klan Acts
The U.S. Constitution Essay
Essay on US Constitution
The Three Branches
US Constitution Essay
The Us Constitution
The Us Constitution
The US Constitution Essay
Essay on US Constitution
Essay about The Constitution
Reconstruction sought to rebuild the South after the Civil War and integrate freed black slaves into society. There were disagreements over how it should be controlled and how to balance white and black political power. Presidential Reconstruction under Johnson enfranchised ex-Confederates but was resisted by Radical Republicans in Congress who instituted military control over the South and protected black civil rights. Corruption scandals weakened Republican support, and the Compromise of 1877 ended Reconstruction by withdrawing federal troops from the South.
This document discusses the origins and current status of the governments of the United States and Black Americans. It claims that Black Americans were never meant to be citizens or slaves of the colonial US government established by the original 13 states. Instead, Black Americans' true sovereign government was the original confederation of Native American nations that preceded and gave rise to the colonial US. The document argues that today's US federal government is an illegitimate de facto regime that has replaced the original de jure government, and that Black Americans are the true creditors and beneficiaries of the US political system.
The document summarizes key events during the Reconstruction era following the Civil War, including the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments which abolished slavery and granted citizenship and voting rights to African Americans. It also discusses the Freedmen's Bureau, violence against blacks in the South, the imposition of military rule over former Confederate states, and debates around currency policy, debt, and economic issues. The 1876 presidential election was disputed, leading to the Compromise of 1877 which ended Reconstruction and removed federal troops from the South.
Did the so-called African-Americans Knowingly, Wilfully and Voluntarily Become Stateless Foreign Corporate Slaves under the colonial corporate Federal United States Constitution via voter registration?
1) The document discusses the planning for reconstruction and peace before the surrender of the Confederacy, including Lincoln's preliminary Emancipation Proclamation of September 1862 and his 1865 Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction.
2) It also covers the alternative Wade-Davis Bill of 1864 which proposed stricter reconstruction terms, as well as the surrender of Robert E. Lee in April 1865 and Lincoln's assassination a week later.
3) Lincoln's assassination was part of a larger conspiracy plot to kill other government leaders and potentially overthrow the US government, though this broader plot ultimately failed.
The document provides an overview of Reconstruction in the United States following the Civil War. It discusses the key issues faced, such as how to rebuild the South and protect the rights of freed black people. Different approaches to Reconstruction are examined, from Lincoln's lenient 10% Plan to the more rigorous Radical Reconstruction under Congressional Republicans that established new governments in the South and protected civil rights through amendments and legislation. However, enforcement of these new rights proved difficult as white supremacist groups like the Ku Klux Klan resisted black political participation and violence increased.
The document discusses federal, state, and tribal laws related to Washington tribes. It covers the U.S. Constitution and how it established federal supremacy over tribal matters. Key treaties like the Stevens Treaties of 1854-1855 reserved tribal rights to fishing and hunting. The document also summarizes several important court cases that shaped tribal sovereignty and jurisdiction, such as Oliphant v. Suquamish Tribe and Montana v. United States. It concludes with an overview of more recent self-governance laws and agreements between Washington tribes and the state government.
For the Autochthonous IN: The United States of North AmericaICJ-ICC
The document summarizes the actual governmental structure of the United States from the perspective of the author. It describes three levels of government: (1) the unincorporated counties that form nation-states, which together form the United States; (2) the unincorporated states that represent the nation-states internationally and form the United States of America; and (3) the unincorporated American States-of-States that were intended to conduct routine business but have been inactive since the Civil War. The author asserts that foreign entities have illegitimately taken over governmental functions in the absence of the true American State Assemblies and States-of-States.
The document discusses the key aspects of American constitutionalism, including that it is based on written texts that enable government while also limiting it. It outlines several important founding documents and thinkers that influenced the American system. The document also examines the Declaration of Independence and how it expressed the colonists' grievances against King George III, as well as the rise of republicanism and weak central government under the Articles of Confederation.
This document discusses the unequal treatment of Western states compared to Eastern states with regards to federally controlled public lands. It notes that while Eastern states had sovereignty over their lands from the beginning, Western states had over 90% of their lands controlled by the federal government indefinitely. It highlights the arguments made by Illinois Representative Orlando Ficklin in 1848 for a bill to cede public lands to the states, including that all states must have equal sovereignty and rights to develop their resources. It also discusses how Senator Thomas Hart Benton of Missouri relentlessly advocated for reforming the system to transfer more control of public lands to the states.
This document discusses the evolution of America's constitutions over time, from the colonial charters through the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution of 1788. It notes how several key principles of the original Constitution, like limited government, federalism, separation of powers, and checks and balances, have changed significantly over time due to legislation, amendments, and judicial interpretations. Specifically, the federal government's powers have expanded far beyond the limited, enumerated powers originally intended. The document questions whether America still operates under its original Constitution or something quite different today.
Alaska is more than 67% federally controlled lands. Hawaii has less than 20% and was granted land by the federal government. Why the difference? The Transfer of Public Lands is the Only Solution Big Enough to 1) fund education, 2) better care for our lands and forests, 3) protect access, 4) create jobs, and 5) grow our local, state, and national economies and tax base.
The document discusses three levels of government in the United States:
1) The original sovereign government formed by 13 nation-states known as the United States of North America in 1776.
2) A con-federal government formed by the states in 1787 to handle certain delegated powers.
3) A territorial government formed in 1789 and a municipal government formed in 1790 that together make up the federal government.
The key point is that citizens have likely been misidentified as falling under the federal government instead of their proper status as nation-state citizens, and must take steps to claim their natural rights and participate in nation-state assemblies.
- Reconstruction involved three main plans for rebuilding the South after the Civil War: Presidential Reconstruction under Lincoln and Johnson, Congressional or Radical Reconstruction, and the Compromise of 1877.
- The Freedmen's Bureau was established to help former slaves transition to freedom and provide education and welfare services. Black Codes imposed restrictions on freed slaves.
- Congressional Reconstruction overruled Presidential Reconstruction. The 14th Amendment was passed defining citizenship and equal protection. The 15th Amendment banned voting restrictions based on race.
The document provides the full text of the U.S. Constitution along with explanatory notes. It begins with an introductory essay that discusses the historical context for the creation of the Constitution, including the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, the events leading up to the Constitutional Convention, the debates and compromises that occurred, and the ratification process. It then presents the full text of the Constitution along with annotations to explain the meaning and intent of its provisions. The document serves as a reference for understanding both the original Constitution and its continued relevance today.
Learn the basics of the Transfer of Public Lands! This presentation will help answer questions such as: why transfer lands? Has this been done before? And Can we afford to transfer the lands? You will also learn what you can do to help American Lands Council move this important effort forward.
Learn the basics of the Transfer of Public Lands! This presentation will help answer questions such as: why transfer lands? Has this been done before? And Can we afford to transfer the lands? You will also learn what you can do to help American Lands Council move this important effort forward.
The document discusses the original sovereign governments established after the American Revolution - The Union, The United States of America Federation, and The States of America Confederation. It asserts that three separate constitutions were established in the late 18th century, delegating some sovereign powers and duties of the original governments to British and Papal subcontractors. This led to ongoing confusion between the original sovereign governments established by the people and the subcontracted British territorial and Papal municipal governments that were established. The document advocates learning this history to understand the proper roles and jurisdictions of the original governments versus the subcontracted ones.
THE UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA (Update)ICJ-ICC
This document discusses the history of global trusts and how they relate to jurisdictions over land, sea, and air. It describes how the global estate trust was established in 1302 and has operated since, providing various services. The trust is overseen from four headquarters: the Vatican, Westminster, Washington D.C., and the United Nations. It suggests we have all been part of this global trust system for the past 700 years, whether we realize it or not.
Similar to National Bar Association / American Bar Association (20)
The structural forces of changing demographics, environmental challenges, economic shifts, and advancing technologies are interacting with human responses to shape emerging dynamics at the societal, state, and international levels. This is creating disequilibrium that is fueling greater contestation within communities, between states, and across the international system. How these dynamics unfold and interact over the next two decades will determine the trajectory of the global order in 2040, with scenarios ranging from a democratic renaissance to separate spheres of international influence. Adaptation to these forces of change will be imperative for all actors.
The document provides instructions for citizens to organize their own state jural assemblies in order to end foreign courts from imposing unjust laws. It recommends declaring one's political status as a birthright American, joining the state assembly, and organizing a jural assembly to serve as jurors and elect officers. Finally, it suggests invoking Ex Parte Milligan and notifying admiralty and commercial courts to stand down, as the way to change courts is for citizens to provide their own court services through organized jural assemblies.
1. A Summoning Authority calls the Autochthon States into Session to begin the Assembly Process. Volunteers from the States step forward and are vetted as Coordinators to organize the work.
2. Assemblies are populated and the General Assembly and International Assembly are established. The Jural Assembly and Courts are also established.
3. The Assembly Militia is organized and Session Officers and Officials are elected and undergo training before the Assembly Process is complete and the Coordinator's role ends.
The document summarizes the fraudulent bankruptcy of the United States government in the 1930s and the deception used to claim ownership over American citizens and their assets.
Key points:
- In 1930, the US declared bankruptcy at the Geneva Conventions and removed from the gold standard.
- In 1933, FDR pursued domestic bankruptcy and confiscated privately held American gold, totaling over 20,000 tons.
- Birth certificates were issued to claim Americans as property and pledge their labor and assets to pay government debts. This established an "implied contract" without proper disclosure or consent.
- Through legal trickery and semantic deceit, the US government unlawfully seized control of American assets and estates from 1933 to 1999
The document discusses the concept of a "new world order" proposed by President Bush after the Gulf War in 1991. It argues that while Bush invoked the phrase, his administration failed to give it meaning or follow through on realizing its vision. It calls for reviving and investing the concept with a guiding vision that can organize American foreign policy going forward, focusing on collective security and international cooperation. The end of the Cold War presents an opportunity for reformulating US strategy and priorities around this new world order.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help boost feelings of calmness and well-being.
The document analyzes proposals for world government and argues they constitute treason against the United States. It claims the ultimate goals of prominent world government organizations like United World Federalists would reduce the American standard of living, curtail liberties, destroy free institutions, scrap the Constitution, abolish the military, and give away the Panama Canal. While many supporters have good intentions, the movement is actually controlled by socialists, communist sympathizers, and "One World Firsters" plotting to destroy the American way of life and create a global socialist superstate. Evidence suggests world government is being promoted to establish socialism in the U.S. Critics are dismissed while the movement's leadership hides its true aims behind patriotic rhetoric.
Message to The Ancient Royal Chinese Dynasty Families ICJ-ICC
1. The document is a letter from Ernest Rauthschild, Hand of the King of the United Continent of Lemuria-Animasola Divine World Government, to various ancient royal Chinese dynasties and political leaders regarding global assets and collateral accounts.
2. The letter asserts that the original inhabitants and possessors of many parts of Africa, Asia, Europe and the Americas were various Asiatic nations including Egyptians, Arabs, Japanese, Chinese, Indians, and others described as descendants of ancient Canaanites and Moors.
3. Rauthschild challenges the jurisdiction and claims of the recipients, stating he holds ancient records dating back to 01-4 including books, seals, and treaties
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise boosts blood flow, releases endorphins, and promotes changes in the brain which help enhance one's emotional well-being and mental clarity.
- The document is the Monthly Treasury Statement from the U.S. Department of the Treasury that summarizes receipts, outlays, deficits/surpluses, and financing of the federal government for fiscal years 2020 and 2021 through November 30, 2020.
- In November 2020, receipts were $219.5 billion, outlays were $364.8 billion, resulting in a deficit of $145.3 billion. For fiscal year 2021 through November, receipts were $457.3 billion, outlays were $886.6 billion, with a cumulative deficit of $429.3 billion.
- Key sources of receipts included social insurance/retirement at $106 billion and individual income
This document outlines Title 50, Section 7 of the U.S. Code regarding sole relief and remedies related to enemies or allies of enemies during times of war. It specifies that enemies or allies have no right or remedy against debtors or those liable to fulfill obligations, unless the assignment or delivery occurred before the war began or is licensed. It allows for payments, conveyances or transfers to be made to the Alien Property Custodian and outlines the process and effects of such actions.
This document is an agreement between vaccine administrators and recipients regarding vaccination. It lists 24 stipulations acknowledging risks of vaccines and requiring administrators to accept liability for any harm caused. It requires administrators to disclose vaccine ingredients and sign the agreement accepting liability to receive informed consent for vaccination. Refusal to sign indicates unwillingness to accept responsibility for potential harm and is grounds for refusing vaccination.
The document summarizes the secret Treaty of Verona signed in 1822 between Austria, France, Prussia, and Russia. The key points are:
1) The treaty aimed to suppress representative governments and prevent their establishment in Europe, seeing them as incompatible with monarchical rule.
2) It also sought to suppress freedom of the press and promote religious principles that encouraged obedience to rulers.
3) France was given funds by the other nations to help suppress the recent liberal constitution in Spain and prevent self-government in Spain and Portugal.
4) This treaty provided the basis for the Monroe Doctrine, which opposed European interference in the Americas.
The document is a contract signed in 1783 between King Louis XVI of France and the United States to provide a new loan of 6 million livres to the newly independent nation. It outlines the terms of repayment, including reimbursing the loan in six equal installments starting in 1797 with 5% annual interest paid starting in 1785. It also summarizes previous loans provided by France to a total of 38 million livres being reimbursed on different schedules. The contract aims to establish clear terms to help the finances of both the U.S. and France.
"The Negro a beast, but created with articulate speech,
and hands, that he may be of service to his master—the White man"........ United States Congressional Record.
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations DemystifiedPROF. PAUL ALLIEU KAMARA
To ensure the integrity of financial systems and combat illicit financial activities, understanding AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance regulations is crucial for financial institutions and businesses. AML compliance regulations are designed to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities by imposing specific requirements on financial institutions, including customer due diligence, monitoring, and reporting of suspicious activities (GitHub Docs).
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaintsseoglobal20
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
Pedal to the Court Understanding Your Rights after a Cycling Collision.pdfSunsetWestLegalGroup
The immediate step is an intelligent choice; don’t procrastinate. In the aftermath of the crash, taking care of yourself and taking quick steps can help you protect yourself from significant injuries. Make sure that you have collected the essential data and information.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
National Bar Association / American Bar Association
1. THE UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA
THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH AMERICA
THE FAMILY OF NATIONS
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20004
11 October 2020
Sent via Electronic Mail
Ms. Tricia “CK” Hoffler
President
National Bar Association
1816 12th
Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20009
Patricia Lee Refo
President
American Bar Association (Northern Trust)
321 North Clark Street
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Re: Offences Against Law of Nations, Genocide, Slavery, War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity, Treason,
Discrimination, Racketeering Influence Corruption Organized Crime, Breach of Trust, Breach of Contract and Fraud
Against the Black, Brown, Coppertone Aboriginals of The United States of North America.
Dear Ms. Hoffler and Ms. Refo:
I am writing to you today pursuant to my duty to fully inform you.
1. Please be informed that, each of you, and your members do not represent Black, Brown and Coppertone original
people, We The People, of the “original” United States aka the Preamble Posterity General Government of The United
States of North America (USNA), Sovereign and Unincorporated, and that they are not your employees. They are in
fact your employers and benefactor and are the Beneficiary of the United States Trust which you are all supposed to be
administering as Trustees on their behalf; also be informed that DEBORAH JEAN PRICE and DEBORAH J. PRICE
and all other franchises created or thought to be created and operated under these names owe their allegiance to the land
of Washington, are of age, and are voluntarily expatriated from any allegiance, obligation, or association with the cor-
poration doing business as the UNITED STATES and equally expatriated from any allegiance, obligation, or association
with the corporation doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
The same is true for WILLIAM HENRY COSBY JR., WILLIAM H. COSBY JR., JUSTIN “JUSSIE” SMOLLETT
JUSTIN J. SMOLLETT, ROBERT SYLVESTER KELLY and ROBERT S. KELLY.
The living original people, Americans, who are the respective Holders in Due Course of these given names and the
underlying Trade Names formed in Upper and Lower Case and all other derivative names, labels, accounts, assets and
vessels in commerce associated with them are American State Nationals owing their singular allegiance to the land of
their birth.
This is your Notice of these facts.
2. 2
2. In April of 1861, Lincoln forced the remaining (Northern States) members of Congress back into Session as
Commander-in-Chief under martial law, and this has remained the situation ever since. Despite three public declara-
tions by President Andrew Johnson declaring the land jurisdiction to be at peace, no peace was ever actually declared
and no Peace Treaty ending the Civil War has ever been signed, with the result that our nation has remained at constant
“war” of one kind or another for 150 years. This has caused incalculable damage to millions of people worldwide and
the deaths and deprivations of millions of Americans, too. The blame for this continuing outrage against humanity rests
firmly on the shoulders of your predecessors and now upon your shoulders.
Resume operation of the proper civil government owed to us under international treaty or stand revealed before the
entire world as a nothing more than a despicable corporate military dictatorship being run by international banks under
color of law.
This is your Notice of these facts.
3. June of 1864-- the “acting Congress” passed an Act changing the meaning of "state, States and United States" to
mean "the territories and District of Columbia". (13 Stat. 223, 306, Ch. 173, § 182, June 30, 1864.)
“US Territories” means “portions of the United States that are not within the limits of any state and have not been
admitted as states. Includes all federal installations”—military bases, docks, courthouses, arsenals, etc.
This was never changed, so, all references to “state, States, and United States” in Federal Code that are not otherwise
specifically defined, must be construed as “the territories and District of Columbia”.
You must also make a distinction between the meaning of the words used prior to and then after the passage of this 1864
corporate law.
Prior to this, “state, States, and United States” meant what we commonly still believe them to mean--- after 1864 in
Federal Code—they generally meant something entirely different and opposed to the popular meaning.
This is your Notice of these facts.
4. In 1871-78 an additional meaning was given to “United States” via a process set in motion by the Act of 1871:
The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, Congress chartered
a Federal Company entitled "United States," aka "US Inc.," a "Commercial Agency" originally designated as
"Washington, D.C."
Though the Act of 1871 was repealed, its legislative intent was merely chopped up and subsequently passed via this
process:
“An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” Ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June
11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the
Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the
District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), Sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28,
1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)).
As the actual District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, as it
must be, merely to set up the “United States Corp”.
This process of legislation created a private corporation owned by the actual government of the District of Columbia.
Thus the only government created was that of any private corporation which determines its own administrative rules
and structures.......that is, the US Corp dba “UNITED STATES” is not merely the adopted doing business name of an
incorporated municipality (District of Columbia)--- it is also the name of a private corporation (District of Columbia
3. 3
Municipal Corporation) that was created by the acting Congress via the Act of 1877 and as amended ever since.
This is confirmed by Title 28, § 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C), which states unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is also
the name of a corporation, as just demonstrated from the public records.
This is your Notice of these facts.
5. In 1945, the United States Supreme Court addressed the meaning of “United States” for what it termed the “final
time” and offered the following:
“The term "United States" may be used in any one of several senses. (1) It may be merely the name of a sovereign
occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the Family of Nations. (2) It may designate the territory
over which the sovereignty of the United States (that is, the territories and District of Columbia) extends, or (3) it may
be the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution.” --- Hooven and Allison Company
v. Evatt, 324 US 652 (1945) (This is also the verbatim definition of “United States” given in Black’s Law Dictionary,
6th
Edition.)
Thus we have a total of five definitions of “United States” in common use within the federal government– the three
given above, the one adopted in 1864, and the one coming out of the Acts of 1871-78.
This is your Notice of these facts.
6. The same duplicitous word-smithing was done with the words “United States of America”— with the same result.
From --- A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier, published
1856:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (First meaning given):
“(1) The name of this country. [That is, the actual land mass.] The United States, now thirty-one in number, are Alabama,
Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and California.”
(Fifth meaning): “(5)—The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued,
to convey and receive property, 1 Marsh, Dec. 177, 181, but it is proper to observe that no suit can be brought against
the United States without authority of law.”
So, even before the “US, Inc.” there was the “USA, Inc.” and both of these entities are referenced in what follows.
This is your Notice of these facts.
7. Does the UNITED STATES – the private corporation operating the government of “the Territories and District of
Columbia” have “citizens”?
1873: U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) "The term resident and citizen of the United States (” United States” meaning
“Territories and District of Columbia”) is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is
a special class of citizen created by Congress." (That is a “citizen of the United States” is a “statutory citizen”—created
by legislative action.)
1875 - This definition of "United States" as a Corporation has its own citizens (see United States v. Cruikshank, 92
U.S. 542) who are generally referred to as United States citizens.
1953 - Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383 "A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government…”
4. 4
1967 - Congressional Record , June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646: A "citizen of the United States" is a civilly dead entity
operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, Cestui que Trust of US Inc. under the
14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.
Yes, the UNITED STATES Corporation has “citizens”.
This is your Notice of these facts.
8. Can “citizens of the UNITED STATES” be corporations? Yes.
Diversity of citizenship exists when opposing parties in a lawsuit are citizens of different states or a citizen of a foreign
country. If the party is a corporation, it is a citizen of the state where it is incorporated or is doing business. If diversity
of citizenship exists, it places the case under federal court jurisdiction pursuant to Article III, Section 2 of the U.S.
Constitution.
See above definition of “citizen of the United States” from the 1967 Congressional Record--- “a civilly dead entity
defined as a private constructive cestui que trust which “upholds the debt” of both the USA, Inc. and the US, Inc.”
This is your Notice of these facts.
9. What is a cestui que vie trust? It’s a trust formed when the actual owner of property is “unknown, presumed dead,
lost to accident, natural disaster, or missing at sea” and the State then seizes control of their property assets and presumes
to be the owner and beneficiary of their estate.
So where are all these “missing people” coming from?
From the Bureau of Vital Statistics, which has been busily and fraudulently seizing upon American babies and declaring
them civilly dead almost at birth.
This is your Notice of these facts.
10. What has been done here is nothing less than slavery by proxy:
A corporate franchise has been named after each one of us, and then, we have been coerced and deceived into accepting
the debts of that franchise via a “similar names” deceit.
Prior to 1933 a Foreign Situs Trust created by the USA, Inc. was named after a living man called “John Frederick Doe”
and this Foreign Situs Trust was then also gratuitously named as a Surety for the bankrupt USA, Inc’s debts. The actual
man named John Frederick Doe was then pursued and forced to pay the debts owed in fact by this corporation. In 1999
that bankruptcy settled and the American People paid off every penny of it.
Beginning in 1944 the US. Inc. similarly named a Cestui Que Vie Trust after the living man John Frederick Doe and
called it “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” and this estate trust was named as the Surety for the US Inc.’s debts and “removed”
to Puerto Rico. The actual man named John Frederick Doe was then pursued and forced to pay the debts owed by this
corporate franchise, too.
In the year of 2015, President Obama acting as the CEO in charge of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.
(the USA, Inc’s latest rendition organized under the laws of the United Nations City State) announced the creation of a
new franchise named after “John Frederick Doe”--- and created a franchise of a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electric Utility
named “JOHN F. DOE” operated under the laws of Puerto Rico.
Meanwhile the living American who is the Holder in Due Course of the given name “John Frederick Doe” and who is
in fact the owner and executor of his name and all derivatives thereof associated with him, is being subjected to false
charges and racketeering on a scale unique in world history.
5. 5
All this violence, all this fraud, all this insufferable abuse of our trust and good faith is draped around your necks and is
now on public display.
This is your Notice of these facts.
11. What is the “UNITED STATES” with respect to the states of the Union and the People thereof?
It’s a private mostly foreign-owned corporation subject to the Clearfield Doctrine, nothing more or less, and the same
applies to the USA, Inc. when doing business on our soil. The same applies to all their various “State” franchises,
including the “STATE OF ALASKA” (US, INC.) and “ALASKA” (USA, INC.)
These corporations and their “State” franchises are all being operated as criminal syndicates.
This is your Notice of these facts.
12. Fraud vitiates everything. It destroys all contracts and presumptions. It taints everything it touches. All Ameri-
cans subjected to this undisclosed process in Breach of Trust and Constitution have been defrauded and mischaracterized
and deprived of their lawful status as living people and as American State Nationals. This has been done secretively
and under conditions of deceit and non-disclosure so as to facilitate identity and credit theft and the practice of personage
and barratry against the victims.
All “consent” obtained by any process under these conditions is null and void ab initio and no excuse of war or
emergency may be introduced as no such powers were ever granted under The Constitution for the united States of
America. There is no statute of limitations on the crime of fraud and it is recognized as crime in all venues and
jurisdictions of law, national and international and global.
This is your Notice of these facts.
13. Such mischaracterization and capitulation of the peaceful and non-combatant American People living on the land
of the American States is additionally a war crime, which has been committed against them by the US, Inc. and the
USA, Inc. and their respective corporate officers.
This is your Notice of these facts.
14. Such abuse, theft, misrepresentation, unlawful conversion, inland piracy, kidnapping, press-ganging and racket-
eering is also in deplorable violation of both national and international law and in violation of the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights and the Universal Right of Self Declaration and numerous other Declarations and Conventions of the
United Nations which the United States has agreed to and signed.
This is your Notice of these facts.
15. Is the “United States” a foreign entity with respect to the states of the Union?
We quote The Informer:
“No court is to be charged with the knowledge of foreign laws; but they are well understood to be facts which
must, like other facts, be proved before they can be received in a court of justice. [cites omitted] It is equally well settled
that the several states of the Union are to be considered as in this respect foreign to each other, and that the courts of
one state are not presumed to know, and therefore not bound to take judicial notice of, the laws of another state.”
[Hanley v. Donoghue, 116 U.S. 1, 29 L. Ed. 535] [6 S.Ct. 242, 244 (1885)]
Another key U.S. Supreme Court authority on this question is the case of In re Merriam's Estate, 36 N.E. 505 (1894).
The authors of Corpus Juris Secundum ("CJS"), a legal encyclopedia, relied in part upon this case to arrive at the
6. 6
following conclusion about the "foreign" corporate status of the federal government:
“The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.” [citing In re Merriam's
Estate, 36 N.E. 505, 141 N.Y. 479, affirmed U.S. v. Perkins, 16 S.Ct. 1073, 163 U.S. 625, 41 L.Ed 287] [19 C.J.S.
883] Before you get the idea that this meaning of "foreign" is now totally antiquated, consider the Black's Law
Dictionary, Sixth Edition, which defines "foreign state" very clearly, as follows:
“The several United States*** are considered "foreign" to each other except as regards their relations as common
members of the Union. ... The term "foreign nations," as used in a statement of the rule that the laws of foreign nations
should be proved in a certain manner, should be construed to mean all nations and states other than that in which the
action is brought; and hence one state of the Union is foreign to another, in the sense of that rule.”
And a recent federal statute proves that Congress still refers to the 50 States as "countries". When a State court in
Alaska needed a federal judge to handle a case overload, Congress amended Title 28 to make that possible. In its
reference to the 50 States, the statute is titled the "Assignment of Judges to courts of the freely associated compact
states". Then, Congress refers to these freely associated compact states as "countries":
(b) The Congress consents to the acceptance and retention by any judge so authorized of reimbursement from the
countries referred to in subsection (a) .... [!!!] [28 U.S.C. 297, 11/19/88]” -- End quote.
Each one of the sovereign states of the Union is in fact its own nation having its own distinct character, local law, and
government apart from any franchises owned and operated under color of law by either the US, Inc. or the USA, Inc.
offering to pose as the lawful government of the people, for the people and by the people of these United States.
This is your Notice of these facts.
16. Was it ever the intent of the Black Founders of this Country that any Congress operating in any capacity whatso-
ever would ever be granted any right of despotism over the People via any means, mechanism, or pretense?
The Preamble of the actual Constitution which is a trust indenture forever obligating the government of the United
States however that government is defined gives the answer, which was further elucidated by the Bill of Rights.
As all the foregoing demonstrates you are each and collectively in Breach of Trust and in Commercial and
Administrative Default with respect to your presumed Public Offices and are operating as the administrators of an
international crime syndicate with respect to the people and states of the Union you are hired to protect and which you
have freely claimed to “represent”.
This is your Notice of these facts.
17. The seedbed of these crimes against Black Americans has been the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, which has
been used as a staging ground for these heinous activities by the British Crown and its operatives, and the United Nations
Corporation (UN Corp) –not to be confused with the United Nations--- which has sought by various means of similar
fraud and force to impose its administration upon us and all other sovereign nations.
This is your Notice of these facts.
18. We have informed the Secretary General of the United Nations and the United States Secretary of State and the
Joint Chiefs of Staff and hereby give Notice to the United States Congress that these acts of virulent crime against the
original Black American people and the states of the Union and all claims and presumptions based upon them must
come to an immediate and permanent stop.
Full disclosure and remedy must be provided to all natural born{Aboriginals} American State Nationals and all their
vessels in commerce must receive full cure and maintenance without further obfuscation, avoidance, or delay.
The operations of the Trustees of the insolvent UNITED STATES, INC. and the administrators of THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, INC. must be brought under control and forced to comply with both national and international
7. 7
law. If President Trump objects, he must be impeached without further excuse or delay.
This is your Notice of these facts.
18. Any officer corporate or otherwise of the United States or its government however defined who fails to take
immediate and forceful action to correct and remedy these practices and issues in favor of the original Black American
people and the states of the Union shall be in full admission of treason against the same.
This is your Notice of these facts.
19. Any officer corporate or otherwise of the United States of America or its government however defined who fails
to take immediate and forceful action to correct and remedy these practices and issues in favor of the original Black
American people and the states of the Union shall be in full admission of treason against the same.
This is your Notice of these facts.
20. Operatives of the British Crown and UN Corporation staged initially in Puerto Rico and now operating out of
Florida are implementing a propaganda campaign against the peaceful noncombatant people of the states of the Union
and again mischaracterizing them as “sovereign citizens”.
This is an oxymoron demonstrating the complete ignorance of those applying such a label to Black American State
Nationals.
It is not possible to be or to act as a “sovereign” and at the same time to be or to act as a “citizen”.
The apparent motive for this PR campaign is to excuse the taking of violent action against the Black Aboriginal
American people and against their states of the Union and to provoke an armed insurrection which would then give
these same corporate crime syndicates a plausible excuse for killing their creditors.
This is precisely what happened in Nazi Germany and it is threatening to happen here and now.
Any attempt on the part of the Trustees of the bankrupt and insolvent UNITED STATES or on the part of the operators
of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to provoke such a contest or make such false claims against their creditors
will be instantly and internationally recognized for the specious and self-interested crime that it is.
This is your Notice of these facts.
21. As the “United States Congress” is uniquely and specifically responsible for the administration and indeed, the
misadministration, of the Territories and the District of Columbia, it is incumbent upon each one of you to put an end
to the international crimes being perpetuated by and within the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico against the people of the
United States and to put an end to the efforts of the British Crown and UN Corporation to further parasitize and mis-
characterize and misrepresent The United States of North America. Failure to do so will have permanent and extremely
unpleasant results for all parties engaged in this international crime spree.
This is your Notice of these facts.
22. “The free, sovereign and original independent people of the United States of North America” –quote the Defini-
tive Treaty of Peace, 1783, are still alive and well and competent to act in their own behalf and in behalf of their
sovereign nation-states.
We have kept our part of the constitutional bargain and paid for the services we agreed to receive and also a great many
“services” that we did not agree to receive and for which we do not owe. We have loyally stood by the British and
French Governments through two World Wars, and this present miasma is the thanks we have received for our support.
The mechanism and implementation of these commercial frauds and personage practices against the unsuspecting
people and organic states of the Union was provided by the British Government and by undeclared foreign agents,
8. 8
especially by members of the American Bar Association acting in violation of the 1947 Bar Association Treaty.
The presumptions being exercised against us by the so-called “governments” of these corporations dba UNITED
STATES and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA have become intolerable and we find the constitutional contract
has been Dishonored by those entrusted to act as our fiduciary Deputies, Trustees, and Administrators.
An immediate cessation of all hostile actions and presumptions against the people and the states of the Union and an
immediate declaration of peace formally ending the Civil War and all other “wars” is called for. Any failure to provide
this and all other appropriate remedies will result in the liquidation of the offending corporations via arbitration.
We created the “United States” and the “United States of America” by our sovereign Will and as the creators we are
uniquely endowed to take against the Will and to amend the Will and to destroy the Will if we so desire. By the
misadministration, duplicity, dishonor, and dishonesty of your predecessors we have not been served; any continuance
of these false claims and practices against Aboriginal American State Nationals and the states of the Union will not be
tolerated and will be subject to international prosecution as virulent crimes amounting to identity theft, credit theft,
press-ganging and inland piracy against these United States and the people of the United States.
This is your Notice of these facts.
23. All prosecutions against birthright Americans under the false pretense that they have agreed via any undisclosed
or implied contract to act as “citizens of the United States” or agreed to cede their estates, assets, names or any other
property naturally belonging to them to the UNITED STATES or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA are acts of
international fraud and inland piracy and are subject to the death penalty for anyone caught intentionally and knowingly
participating in or enforcing such crimes under color of law.
The execution of foreign pirates caught in the act may be summarily carried out under Citizens Arrest or by any lawfully
elected Sheriff or any duly appointed Federal Marshall under the Public and Organic Law of this nation.
This is your Notice of these facts.
24. All birthright American State Nationals presently accused of any white collar, statutory, or victimless crime being
held under false pretenses as “citizens of the United States” must be given full disclosure and released without further
delay.
This is your Notice of these facts.
25. All property and rights and material interests naturally and lawfully belonging to birthright American State Na-
tionals must be promptly returned to them and returned to the land recording districts of these United States and to the
administration of the actual organic states and people, together with all escrow accounts, interest, tithes, and fees owed
to them.
We suggest that the administration of THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE be properly informed and pressed into
service to discharge all outstanding debts owed by the fraudulently established individual UNITED STATES franchises
operated under the given NAMES of American State Nationals and obliged to deliver all copyrights, trademarks, titles,
deeds, credit and other assets owed to and naturally belonging to the people of these United States without further
obfuscation or delay.
This is your Notice of these facts.
26. In the interests of national and international peace and decency you are being “requested and required” to do the
job that the trusting American people elected you to do in good faith as Trustees and Fiduciary Deputies. Failure to do
so will be your individual and personal admission of willful treason against these United States and against the people
of these United States.
9. 9
No further excuses or word games are acceptable. The officers of the British Crown among the Delegates either act
with Honor and fulfill their obligations owed to these United States and to the people thereof, or they shall be recognized
as pirates subject to the penalties of both our Public Law and the international Law of Admiralty.
This is your Notice of these facts.
27. We wish to draw your attention to the ravages and rampages taking place in the so-called western compact States
and the atrocities being willfully committed against American State Nationals and their private property interests in
those states by agencies of the UNITED STATES.
An innocent aborigine National of USNA named William Henry Cosby Jr., was convicted by colonial foreign corporate
Federal United States13th
and14th Amendment persons (non-American [C]itizens) receiving their paychecks on our
dole as agents of a foreign corporation merely doing business as the “GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES”
via its subsidiary the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, INCORPORATED [> Title 5, U.S.C.S. §
1501(2)], including the “BLM” and the “FBI”. This foreign colonial corporate Federal State’s agents have acted as
criminals and under false presumptions on our USNA soil.
We call for their immediate arrest and re-education.
Any continuance of this violent racketeering is completely unacceptable and will not be tolerated.
However, Congress has seen fit to organize its administration of the “territories and District of Columbia” its agencies
clearly have no right whatsoever to attack, commandeer, address, or otherwise infringe upon the original people of this
country.
Similarly, American State Nationals including Robert Sylvester Kelly and Justin “Jussie” Smollett and other Black,
Brown and Coppertone original people, We The People, of the “original” United States > USNA have been
mischaracterized as “citizens of the United States” and “United States citizens” while in fact being people of these
United States, i.e., USNA.
We are not amused by the convenient and apparent acts of personage and barratry --- crimes under both national and
international law--- which are being promoted by the Trustees of the UNITED STATES and the misnamed
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (INC) in their attempts to collect on odious debts owed in fact by their own
corporation(s).
What is being attempted is clearly a Reverse Trust Fraud Scheme in which the Trustees of our nation are attempting to
act as the Beneficiaries and are mischaracterizing the actual Beneficiaries of the United States Trust as the Trustees of
a foreign trust we never consensually agreed to participate in and to which we have no natural affiliation at all---the
Public Charitable Trust set up to provide welfare to displaced Caucasian (White persons) plantation slaves in the wake
of the Civil War.
We suggest that the Congress release the western state ranchers and honor its obligations and redirect its erring
employees and inform the creditors of the UNITED STATES of the actual status of these affairs without any further
argument or delay.
It may result in embarrassment, inconvenience, and considerable international negotiation to resolve, but all the
governments of the world are in one way or another in similar condition and the International Year of Jubilee provides
an excellent opportunity for these festering wounds and causes of criminality to be recognized and healed without
further bloodshed, violence, or crime.
This is your Notice of these facts.
28. The Congress which is responsible for the operations of the “government of the United States”--- that is, the US,
Inc. acting as the government of the “territories and District of Columbia” ---and the various Presidents have committed
10. 10
a great many sins against the original Black, Brown and Coppertone people of our nation and their organic states of the
Confederation, including but not limited to all the items addressed in this Notice.
Beginning in 1933 the members of Congress have conspired with the Office of the President and the Governors of
Federal State franchises of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to embezzle from and defraud the original American
people, We The People.
This was done primarily by legislative actions taken under color of law, including the Emergency Banking Acts, the
Trading With The Enemy Act, and much more.
As part of the historical fraud upon the original people, the US, Inc. and the USA, Inc. colluded to set up a fiat currency
to be exchanged on a “dollar for dollar” basis--- a worthless Promissory Note issued by a cartel of international banks
doing business as the “Federal Reserve” while in fact having no association with our lawful government---in exchange
for an American Silver Dollar. This amounted to the exchange of a piece of paper backed by the good faith of criminals
for an ounce of fine silver.
As you all have cause to know, the Federal Reserve bankrupted the old Federal Reserve System and skipped town owing
these United States and the original people of these United States trillions of dollars’ worth of gold and silver.
The Federal Reserve’s most recent iteration now proposes to use our labor and our assets to back more “Notes” ---- and
repeat the same scam, only owing to the fact that they have already embezzled our precious metals, they now wish to
up the ante and more overtly control and enslave us.
This is your Notice that we are not now and never were chattels, slaves, livestock, nor corporate franchises of the
UNITED STATES nor of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA nor any other fictitious entity you care to name and
we are not subject to your statutory rule except by fraud, personage, barratry and criminal mercenary force.
Put another way--the United States belongs to us. We do not belong to it. We are the Priority Creditors, first, last, and
always. Any further attack, embezzlement, misrepresentation, collusion of banks, false claims, or legal chicanery
undertaken against us or our interests will be recognized as an Act of War against innocent Third-Party non-combatants
and you will be held individually and personally and commercially 100% liable.
If this is not apparent to you, you should immediately step down from any office or pretension of office related to us or
our lawful government in any way.
This is your Notice of these facts.
29. In full view of the national identity and credit theft which has been engineered jointly by the UNITED STATES
and USA against the original people of these United States of North America and the states of the Union, the present
members of Congress must either abdicate and make way for new and more competent deputies elected directly and by
paper ballot by the people of these United States or do the right thing and clean up this mess once and for all.
International criminal prosecution of the Federal Reserve and the IMF and all the colluding banking institutions
including the World Bank and IBRD which received American gold and silver assets as their payoff for the 1933 fraud
is necessary. As already noted, fraud has no statute of limitation and is a crime across all jurisdictions and venues of
law worldwide.
Immediate confiscation of the assets of these banks and the assets of shareholders and subsidiaries of these banks is
appropriate and necessary for our national security---and as you should now be aware, if our national security goes, so
does that of the “territories and District of Columbia”.
Proper administration and discipline of the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, the HOUSE OVERSIGHT
SUBCOMMITTEE, and the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES would be another start in the right direction.
11. 11
The BLM, FBI, and other “agencies” are here to serve the public, and if not, they are here to be dissolved.
Immediate re-issuance of American Silver Dollars as both our international and your domestic currency is required as
a first step toward honest trade.
Disengagement from all Middle Eastern conflicts is demanded and you are advised that no contract to serve in the “US
military” is binding as a result of the same fraud and personage scheme herein otherwise described.
Complete immediate cessation of spraying aluminum oxide and other poisonous industrial wastes on our land and on
us is demanded without apology.
Complete immediate cessation of the addition of fluoride, another poisonous industrial waste of the aluminum industry
to our drinking water, is also demanded without apology.
The closure of most if not all foreign military bases which have been created under the auspices of the US, Inc. and the
return of the land and buildings to the host countries needs to be negotiated posthaste.
Our borders need to be sealed and protected and our assets secured against foreign invaders and if they are not promptly
defended and honored by you as members of “Congress” you will stand revealed before the entire world as officers of
a corporate crime syndicate subject to immediate liquidation.
If President Trump objects to any of this remedial program ordered by the people of these United States and the states
of the Confederation, it is your duty so long as you assume any office related to these United States to impeach him
without further delay and remove him from any office having or pretending any authority whatsoever related to us.
Notice given to you is notice to your agents and agencies, and notice given to your agents and agencies is notice to you.
Sincerely,
Ernest Rauthschild
H.E. HRH Ernest Rauthschild 8216-8217
Royal Prime Minister
The United States of North America – The Republic of North America
The Family of Nations
Enclosure: https://www.slideshare.net/ICJ-ICC/royal-pcijicjicc-notice
cc: Sent via Diplomatic Courier Services
Mr. Donald J. Trump, President, United States, Incorporated, United States of America, Incorporated
Mr. Mark T. Esper US Secretary of Defense, Incorporated
General Mark A. Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Mr. William Pelham Barr, United States Attorney General
Mr. António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations
The Royal International Court of Justice (ICJ-ICC) Philippines
Mr. Jorge Mario Bergoglio aka Pope Francis, Catholic Church and the Vatican City State, Incorporated
Mr. Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger aka Pope Benedict XVI, Holy See
Mr. Josh Shapiro, Pennsylvania Attorney General
The Grand Council
The Dragon Court