CR
Uploaded byCarole Rafferty
232 views

NAG - Bloomingdale SD General Data

This document analyzes NJASK test scores in Language Arts & Literacy for students in grades 3 through 8 in the Bloomingdale School District from 2006 to 2014. It shows that overall proficiency rates have fluctuated from year to year but have generally been between 60-70% for most grades. Grade 3 had the lowest average combined proficiency rate at 65.7% while grades 4 and 5 both averaged around 65.7%. The data suggests that the school district has experienced some challenges in maintaining consistent student achievement levels on standardized tests over this period.

Embed presentation

Download to read offline
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 1 Narrowing the Achievement Gap: Bloomingdale Common Core and The New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge Test
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 2 Bloomingdale School District New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge Tests Study 2006-2014 Population (2012)* 7,688 Area (sq. mi.) 9.1 Pop. Density (sq. mi) 878.6 N.J. Pop. Ranking 297 White 91.97% Black 1.1% Hispanic 9.33% Asian 2.46% Median HHI $79,044 Per Capita Income $32,417 N.J. PCI Ranking 300 Unemployment Rate 10.3% Poverty Level 5.7% No. Housing Units (2010) 3,089 Owner-Occupied Units 73.9% No. Murders (2011) 1 N.J. School Ranking 635 No. of Students 522 Cost Per Pupil $19,099 SAT Ranking 143 SAT Verbal 495 SAT Math 505 Graduation Rate (2012) 92.7% Adult Education Level, H.S. 39.9% Adult Education Level, College 17.0% Adult Education Level, Master’s 7.6% Adult Education Level, Prof/PhD 1.8%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 3 Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Grade 3 3 4 3 4 5 3 4 5 6 3 4 5 6 7 3 4 5 6 7 8 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 15 16 16 CORE Study Grade Schedule
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 4 Narrowing the Achievement Gap: Bloomingdale NJASK Language Arts & Literacy Scores Grades 3 through 8
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 5 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 BloomingdaleSchoolDistrict MarthaB.DayElementarySchoolandWalterT.BergenMiddleSchool NJASKLALProficiencyScoresbyGrade 2006-2014 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg Gr. 3 68.8% 75.9% 94.0% 45.2% 60.3% 60.2% 78.0% 67.0% 74.4% 69.3% Gr. 4 79.9% 83.8% 84.8% 66.2% 47.9% 56.4% 57.0% 60.0% 52.7% 65.4% Gr. 5 92.7% 78.9% 51.6% 62.5% 65.3% 67.6% 73.0% 60.0% 70.8% 69.2%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 6 Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. School Year & Grade 2014 Gr. 3 25.7% 67.6% 6.8% 74.4% Gr. 4 47.3% 52.7% 0.0% 52.7% Gr. 5 29.2% 58.5% 12.3% 70.8% 2013 Gr. 3 33.0% 63.0% 4.0% 67.0% Gr. 4 40.0% 55.0% 5.0% 60.0% Gr. 5 40.0% 55.0% 5.0% 60.0% 2012 Gr. 3 22.0% 68.0% 10.0% 78.0% Gr. 4 44.0% 51.0% 6.0% 57.0% Gr. 5 27.0% 71.0% 2.0% 73.0% 2011 Gr. 3 39.9% 56.4% 3.8% 60.2% Gr. 4 43.6% 56.4% 0.0% 56.4% Gr. 5 32.4% 67.6% 0.0% 67.6% 2010 Gr. 3 39.7% 60.3% 0.0% 60.3% Gr. 4 52.1% 47.9% 0.0% 47.9% Gr. 5 34.7% 61.1% 4.2% 65.3% 2009 Gr. 3 54.8% 43.8% 1.4% 45.2% Gr. 4 33.8% 66.2% 0.0% 66.2% Gr. 5 37.5% 57.1% 5.4% 62.5% 2008 Gr. 3 6.0% 94.0% 0.0% 94.0% Gr. 4 15.2% 83.1% 1.7% 84.8% Gr. 5 48.4% 51.6% 0.0% 51.6% 2007 Gr. 3 24.1% 69.4% 6.5% 75.9% Gr. 4 16.2% 80.9% 2.9% 83.8% Gr. 5 21.1% 75.4% 3.5% 78.9% 2006 Gr. 3 31.3% 68.8% 0.0% 68.8% Gr. 4 20.1% 75.9% 4.0% 79.9% Gr. 5 7.3% 86.6% 6.1% 92.7% and Walter T. Bergen Middle School (5th), Code 50 Martha B. Day Elementary School (3rd/4th), Code 30 Bloomingdale School District 0420 NJASK Scores Language Arts & Literacy 2006-2014
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 7 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School and Walter T. Bergen Middle School NJASK LAL Proficiency Scores by Grade 2006-2014 Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Partially Proficient
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 8 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School and Walter T. Bergen School NJASK LAL Combined Proficiency Scores by Grade 2006-2014 Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Advanced Proficient
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 9 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Avg Combine d TP & TAP Avg. 68.8% 79.9% 92.7% 75.9% 83.8% 78.9% 94.0% 84.8% 51.6% 45.2% 66.2% 62.5% 60.3% 47.9% 65.3% 60.2% 56.4% 67.6% 78.0% 57.0% 73.0% 67.0% 60.0% 60.0% 74.4% 52.7% 70.8% 68.2% Total Proficient 68.8% 75.9% 86.6% 69.4% 80.9% 75.4% 94.0% 83.1% 51.6% 43.8% 66.2% 57.1% 60.3% 47.9% 61.1% 56.4% 56.4% 67.6% 68.0% 51.0% 71.0% 63.0% 55.0% 55.0% 67.6% 52.7% 58.5% 65.2% Total Partially Proficient -31.3% -20.1% -7.3% -24.1% -16.2% -21.1% -6.0% -15.2% -48.4% -54.8% -33.8% -37.5% -39.7% -52.1% -34.7% -39.9% -43.6% -32.4% -22.0% -44.0% -27.0% -33.0% -40.0% -40.0% -25.7% -47.3% -29.2% -31.8% Total Advanced Proficient 0.0% 4.0% 6.1% 6.5% 2.9% 3.5% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 5.4% 0.0% 0.0% 4.2% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 6.0% 2.0% 4.0% 5.0% 5.0% 6.8% 0.0% 12.3% 3.0% Martha B. Day School (3rd/4th) and Walter T. Bergen School (5th) Bloomingdale School District NJASK LAL Proficiency Scores by Grade - 2006-2014
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 10 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School and Walter T. Bergen Middle School NJASK LAL Combined Proficiency Score Averages by Grade 2006-2014 Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Partially Proficient
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 11 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 -30.7% -34.7% -31.1% 65.7% 63.2% 65.7% 3.6% 2.2% 3.3% Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School and Walter T. Bergen School NJASK LAL Proficiency Score Averages by Grade 2006-2014 Total Advanced Proficient Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 12 Martha B. Day School (3rd/4th) and Walter T. Bergen School (5th) Bloomingdale School District NJASK Proficiency Scores - Language Arts & Literacy 2006-2014 Grade 3 Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. 2006 31.3% 68.8% 0.0% 68.8% 2007 24.1% 69.4% 6.5% 75.9% 2008 6.0% 94.0% 0.0% 94.0% 2009 54.8% 43.8% 1.4% 45.2% 2010 39.7% 60.3% 0.0% 60.3% 2011 39.9% 56.4% 3.8% 60.2% 2012 22.0% 68.0% 10.0% 78.0% 2013 33.0% 63.0% 4.0% 67.0% 2014 25.7% 67.6% 6.8% 74.4% Avg 30.7% 65.7% 3.6% 69.3% Grade 4 Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. 2006 20.1% 75.9% 4.0% 79.9% 2007 16.2% 80.9% 2.9% 83.8% 2008 15.2% 83.1% 1.7% 84.8% 2009 33.8% 66.2% 0.0% 66.2% 2010 52.1% 47.9% 0.0% 47.9% 2011 43.6% 56.4% 0.0% 56.4% 2012 44.0% 51.0% 6.0% 57.0% 2013 40.0% 55.0% 5.0% 60.0% 2014 47.3% 52.7% 0.0% 52.7% Avg 34.7% 63.2% 2.2% 65.4% Grade 5 Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. 2006 7.3% 86.6% 6.1% 92.7% 2007 21.1% 75.4% 3.5% 78.9% 2008 48.4% 51.6% 0.0% 51.6% 2009 37.5% 57.1% 5.4% 62.5% 2010 34.7% 61.1% 4.2% 65.3% 2011 32.4% 67.6% 0.0% 67.6% 2012 27.0% 71.0% 2.0% 73.0% 2013 40.0% 55.0% 5.0% 60.0% 2014 29.2% 58.5% 12.3% 70.8% Avg 31.1% 65.7% 3.3% 69.0%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 13 NAG – Bloomingdale School District NJASK Math Scores Grades 3 through 8
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 14 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 BloomingdaleSchoolDistrict Martha B. Day Schooland WalterT. Bergen School NJASKMath ProficiencyScoresby Grade 2006-2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg Gr. 3 78.4% 87.1% 82.1% 78.1% 70.7% 85.9% 90.0% 81.0% 81.0% 81.7% Gr. 4 86.2% 89.8% 86.7% 60.2% 75.3% 61.8% 65.0% 79.9% 78.2% 75.6% Gr. 5 80.5% 75.4% 71.9% 60.7% 69.5% 73.3% 83.0% 92.7% 78.5% 75.9%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 15 Bloomingdale School District 0420 NJASK Scores - Math 2006-2014 Martha B. Day School (3rd/4th) and Walter T. Bergen School (5th), Codes 30 and 50 Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. School Year & Grade 2014 Gr. 3 18.9% 40.5% 40.5% 81.0% Gr. 4 21.8% 56.4% 21.8% 78.2% Gr. 5 21.5% 55.4% 23.1% 78.5% 2013 Gr. 3 19.0% 33.0% 48.0% 81.0% Gr. 4 27.0% 52.0% 21.0% 79.9% Gr. 5 19.0% 58.0% 23.0% 92.7% 2012 Gr. 3 10.0% 35.0% 55.0% 90.0% Gr. 4 36.0% 51.0% 14.0% 65.0% Gr. 5 17.0% 56.0% 27.0% 83.0% 2011 Gr. 3 14.1% 47.4% 38.5% 85.9% Gr. 4 38.2% 49.1% 12.7% 61.8% Gr. 5 26.8% 47.9% 25.4% 73.3% 2010 Gr. 3 29.3% 29.3% 41.4% 70.7% Gr. 4 24.7% 53.4% 21.9% 75.3% Gr. 5 30.5% 52.8% 16.7% 69.5% 2009 Gr. 3 21.9% 46.6% 31.5% 78.1% Gr. 4 39.7% 42.6% 17.6% 60.2% Gr. 5 39.3% 41.1% 19.6% 60.7% 2008 Gr. 3 17.9% 59.7% 22.4% 82.1% Gr. 4 13.3% 40.0% 46.7% 86.7% Gr. 5 28.1% 56.3% 15.6% 71.9% 2007 Gr. 3 12.9% 58.1% 29.0% 87.1% Gr. 4 16.2% 41.3% 48.5% 89.8% Gr. 5 24.6% 61.4% 14.0% 75.4% 2006 Gr. 3 21.6% 48.7% 29.7% 78.4% Gr. 4 13.8% 37.9% 48.3% 86.2% Gr. 5 19.5% 64.6% 15.9% 80.5%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 16 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School and Walter T. Bergen School NJASK Combined Math Proficiency Scores by Grade 2006-2014 Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Partially Proficient
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 17 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School and Walter T. Bergen School NJASK Math Proficiency Scores by Grade 2006-2014 Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Advanced Proficient
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 18 Martha B. Day School (3rd/4th) and Walter T. Bergen School (5th) Bloomingdale School District NJASK Math Proficiency Scores by Grade - 2006-2014 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Avg Combined TP & TAP Avg. 78.4% 86.2% 80.5% 87.1% 89.8% 75.4% 82.1% 86.7% 71.9% 78.1% 60.2% 60.7% 70.7% 75.3% 69.5% 85.9% 61.8% 73.3% 90.0% 65.0% 83.0% 81.0% 79.9% 92.7% 81.0% 78.2% 78.5% 77.9% Total Proficient 48.7% 37.9% 64.6% 58.1% 41.3% 61.4% 59.7% 40.0% 56.3% 46.6% 42.6% 41.1% 29.3% 53.4% 52.8% 47.4% 49.1% 47.9% 35.0% 51.0% 56.0% 33.0% 52.0% 58.0% 40.5% 56.4% 55.4% 48.7% Total Partially Proficient -21.6% -13.8% -19.5% -12.9% -16.2% -24.6% -17.9% -13.3% -28.1% -21.9% -39.7% -39.3% -29.3% -24.7% -30.5% -14.1% -38.2% -26.8% -10.0% -36.0% -17.0% -19.0% -27.0% -19.0% -18.9% -21.8% -21.5% -23.1% Total Advanced Proficient 29.7% 48.3% 15.9% 29.0% 48.5% 14.0% 22.4% 46.7% 15.6% 31.5% 17.6% 19.6% 41.4% 21.9% 16.7% 38.5% 12.7% 25.4% 55.0% 14.0% 27.0% 48.0% 21.0% 23.0% 40.5% 21.8% 23.1% 28.5%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 19 -100.0%-90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School and Walter T. Bergen School NJASK Math Combined Proficiency Score Averages by Grade 2006-2014 Total Partially Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg.
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 20 -100.0%-90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School and Walter T. Bergen School NJASK Math Proficiency Score Averages by Grade 2006-2014 Total Advanced Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 21 Martha B. Day School (3rd/4th) and Walter T. Bergen School (5th) Bloomingdale School District NJASK Proficiency Scores - Math 2006-2014 Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. Grade 3 2006 21.6% 48.7% 29.7% 78.4% 2007 12.9% 58.1% 29.0% 87.1% 2008 17.9% 59.7% 22.4% 82.1% 2009 21.9% 46.6% 31.5% 78.1% 2010 29.3% 29.3% 41.4% 70.7% 2011 14.1% 47.4% 38.5% 85.9% 2012 10.0% 35.0% 55.0% 90.0% 2013 19.0% 33.0% 48.0% 81.0% 2014 18.9% 40.5% 40.5% 81.0% Avg 18.4% 44.3% 37.3% 81.6% Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. Grade 4 2006 13.8% 37.9% 48.3% 86.2% 2007 16.2% 41.3% 48.5% 89.8% 2008 13.3% 40.0% 46.7% 86.7% 2009 39.7% 42.6% 17.6% 60.2% 2010 24.7% 53.4% 21.9% 75.3% 2011 38.2% 49.1% 12.7% 61.8% 2012 36.0% 51.0% 14.0% 65.0% 2013 27.0% 52.0% 21.0% 79.9% 2014 21.8% 56.4% 21.8% 78.2% Avg 25.6% 47.1% 28.1% 75.9% Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. Grade 5 2006 19.5% 64.6% 15.9% 80.5% 2007 24.6% 61.4% 14.0% 75.4% 2008 28.1% 56.3% 15.6% 71.9% 2009 39.3% 41.1% 19.6% 60.7% 2010 30.5% 52.8% 16.7% 69.5% 2011 26.8% 47.9% 25.4% 73.3% 2012 17.0% 56.0% 27.0% 83.0% 2013 19.0% 58.0% 23.0% 92.7% 2014 21.5% 55.4% 23.1% 78.5% Avg 25.1% 54.8% 20.0% 76.2%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 22 NAG – Bloomingdale School District Comparison Data
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 23 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 20132012201120102009200820072006 Bloomingdale School District Grade 4 NJASK LAL Scores Comparison Martha B. Day E.S. Gr. 4 NJASK LAL Scores NJ NAEP Average
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 24 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Bloomingdale School District Grade 4 NJASK Math Score Comparison Martha B. Day Gr. 4 NJASK Math Scores NJ NAEP Average U.S. NAEP Average
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 25 Martha B. Day Gr. 4 Scores Total Core Area Average Literacy Scores Total CD Area Average Literacy Score NJ NAEP Average U.S. NAEP Average 2006 79.9% 88.4% 80.2% 2007 83.8% 86.2% 80.9% 77.2% 65.8% 2008 84.8% 88.5% 83.0% 2009 66.2% 74.1% 67.6% 76.1% 65.7% 2010 47.9% 72.6% 66.3% 82.7% 66.8% 2011 56.4% 75.4% 66.2% 80.6% 61.9% 2012 57.0% 67.2% 61.6% 78.1% 66.2% 2013 60.0% 70.6% 66.7% 82.5% 70.6% Avg 67.0% 77.9% 71.6% 79.5% 66.2% NJASK LAL Scores Comparison - 2006-2013 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 26 NJASK Math Scores Comparison 2006-2013 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Gr. 4 NJASK Math Scores NJ NAEP Average U.S. NAEP Average 2006 86.2% 2007 89.8% 2008 86.7% 2009 60.2% 87.6% 81.1% 2010 75.3% 2011 61.8% 89.0% 82.0% 2012 65.0% 2013 79.9% 87.0% 83.0% Avg 75.6% 87.9% 82.0%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 27 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School Grade 4 NJASK LAL Score 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School Grade 4 Enrollment 2006-2011 NJASK LAL Factor Comparison - 2006-2013 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Avg. Day School Grade 4 NJASK LAL Scores 88.4% 86.2% 88.5% 74.1% 72.6% 75.4% 80.9% Martha B. Day E.S. Grade 4 Enrollment 28 67 58 69 74 55 58.5
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 28 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School Grade 4 NJASK LAL Score 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School Grade 4 Class Size 2006-2011 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Avg. Day School Grade 4 NJASK LAL Scores 88.4% 86.2% 88.5% 74.1% 72.6% 75.4% 80.9% Martha B. Day E.S. Grade 4 Class Size 14.0 16.8 19.3 23.0 24.7 18.3 19.4 NJASK LAL Factor Comparison - 2006-2013 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 29 NJASK LAL Factor Comparison - 2006-2013 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School Grade 4 NJASK LAL Score 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B.Day Elementary School English Speakers 2006-2011 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Avg. Day School Grade 4 NJASK LAL Scores 88.4% 86.2% 88.5% 74.1% 72.6% 75.4% 80.9% Martha B. Day E.S. English Speakers 78.7% 98.5% 98.5% 80.9% 80.9% 100.0% 89.6%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 30 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Average Math Score 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Average Martha B. Day Gr. 4 NJASK Math Scores 86.2% 89.8% 86.7% 60.2% 75.3% 61.8% 76.7% Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Enrollment 28 67 58 69 74 55 58.5 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District NJASK Math Scores Factor Comparisons 2006-2013 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Enrollment 2006-2011
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 31 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District NJASK Math Scores Factor Comparisons 2006-2013 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Average Math Score 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Average Martha B. Day Gr. 4 NJASK Math Scores 86.2% 89.8% 86.7% 60.2% 75.3% 61.8% 76.7% Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Class Size 14.0 16.8 19.3 23.0 24.7 18.3 19.4 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Class Size 2006-2011
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 32 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District NJASK Math Scores Factor Comparisons 2006-2013 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Average Math Score 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B.Day School English Speakers 2006-2011 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Average Martha B. Day Gr. 4 NJASK Math Scores 86.2% 89.8% 86.7% 60.2% 75.3% 61.8% 76.7% Martha B. Day School English Speakers 78.7% 98.5% 98.5% 80.9% 80.9% 100.0% 89.6%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 33 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Bloomingdale Public School District Language Arts & Literacy Versus Math NJASK Scores Comparison LAL Avg. Math Avg.
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 34 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Bloomingdale Public Schools Comparison Language Arts & Literacy Versus Math NJASK Scores - Grade 3 LAL Gr. 3 Math Gr. 3
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 35 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Bloomingdale Public Schools Comparison Language Arts & Literacy Versus Math NJASK Scores - Grade 4 LAL Gr. 4 Math Gr. 4
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 36 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Bloomingdale Public Schools Comparison Language Arts & Literacy Versus Math NJASK Scores - Grade 5 LAL Gr. 5 Math Gr. 5
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 37 NJASK Scores Comparison LAL Versus Math 2006-2014 Martha B. Day Elementary School (3rd/4th) and Walter T. Bergen Middle School (5th) Bloomingdale School District LAL Gr. 3 LAL Gr. 4 LAL Gr. 5 Avg. Combined TP & TAP Avg. 69.2% 65.4% 69.0% 67.9% Total Proficient 65.7% 63.2% 65.7% 64.9% Total Partially Proficient -30.7% -34.7% -31.1% -32.2% Total Advanced Proficient 3.6% 2.2% 3.3% 3.0% Math Gr. 3 Math Gr. 4 Math Gr. 5 Avg. Combined TP & TAP Avg. 81.6% 75.9% 76.2% 77.9% Total Proficient 44.3% 47.1% 54.8% 48.7% Total Partially Proficient -18.4% -25.6% -25.1% -23.1% Total Advanced Proficient 37.3% 28.1% 20.0% 28.5% Math Score Averages by Grade LAL Gr. 3 Math Gr. 3 LAL Gr. 4 Math Gr. 4 LAL Gr. 5 Math Gr. 5 Combined TP & TAP Avg. 69.2% 81.6% 65.4% 75.9% 69.0% 76.2% Total Proficient 65.7% 44.3% 63.2% 47.1% 65.7% 54.8% Total Partially Proficient -30.7% -18.4% -34.7% -25.6% -31.1% -25.1% Total Advanced Proficient 3.6% 37.3% 2.2% 28.1% 3.3% 20.0%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 38 NAG – Bloomingdale School District Enrollment Comparison
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 39 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Bloomingdale School District Enrollment 2006-2013 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 40 Martha B. Day 030 Walter T. Bergen 050 Bloomingdale School District 0420 Enrollment 2006-2013 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Total 2006 37 28 83 148 2007 59 67 53 179 2008 64 58 62 184 2009 74 69 56 199 2010 58 74 72 204 2011 78 55 70 203 2012 61 79 56 196 2013 57 63 75 195 Average 61 62 66 189 Median Change 20 35 -8 47 Percent 33% 57% -12% 25%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 41 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Bloomingdale School District Total Enrollment 3rd - 5th Grades 2006-2013
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 42 NAG – Bloomingdale School District Class Sizes Grades 3 through 5
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 43 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Class Size 2006-2011 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 2006 18.5 14.0 20.8 2007 14.8 16.8 13.3 2008 21.3 19.3 20.7 2009 24.7 23.0 18.7 2010 19.3 24.7 24.0 2011 26.0 18.3 23.3 2012 2013 Average 20.8 19.4 20.1
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 44 NAG – Bloomingdale School District English-Speaking Students
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 45 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Bloomingdale School District Percentage of English-Speaking Students 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 78.5% 98.8% 98.7% 78.2% 79.9% 94.0% 81.0% 81.7%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 46 NAG – Bloomingdale School District SAT Scores
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 47 Verbal SAT Score 2013 495 2012 503 2011 498 2010 498 2009 507 2008 494 2007 488 2006 488 Butler H.S. 495 503 498498 507 494 488488 475 480 485 490 495 500 505 510 20132012201120102009200820072006 Butler High School Verbal SAT Scores 2006-2013
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 48 Math SAT Score 2013 505 2012 501 2011 499 2010 487 2009 499 2008 499 2007 487 2006 497 Butler H.S. 501 499 487 499499 487 497 480 485 490 495 500 505 2012201120102009200820072006 Butler High School Math SAT Scores 2006-2013
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 49 NAG – Bloomingdale School District Adult Resident Education Levels
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 50 Bloomingdale School District Adult Educational Level 39.9% 17.0% 7.6% 1.8% Bloomingdale School District Adult Educational Level High School College Masters Profl/Doctorate
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 51 Adult Education Level Bloomingdale High School 39.9% College 17.0% Masters 7.6% Profl/Doc torate 1.8% Bloomingdale School District Adult Educational Level

More Related Content

PDF
NAG - Butler SD General Data
byCarole Rafferty
 
PDF
NAG - Kinnelon SD General Data
byCarole Rafferty
 
PDF
NAG - Bloomingdale SD Martha B. Day ES Walter T. Bergen MS
byCarole Rafferty
 
PDF
NAG - Butler SD Aaron Decker ES Richard Butler MS
byCarole Rafferty
 
PDF
First Learning Community Presentation Final 10-23-2012
byColby Stoever
 
PPT
Spring 2011 state assessment results_12.13.11[1]
byjimwalsh54
 
PPS
Frases De Madre Teresa De Calcuta
byJNR
 
PPS
Quando A Prisao Vai Alem Das Grades
byJNR
 
NAG - Butler SD General Data
byCarole Rafferty
 
NAG - Kinnelon SD General Data
byCarole Rafferty
 
NAG - Bloomingdale SD Martha B. Day ES Walter T. Bergen MS
byCarole Rafferty
 
NAG - Butler SD Aaron Decker ES Richard Butler MS
byCarole Rafferty
 
First Learning Community Presentation Final 10-23-2012
byColby Stoever
 
Spring 2011 state assessment results_12.13.11[1]
byjimwalsh54
 
Frases De Madre Teresa De Calcuta
byJNR
 
Quando A Prisao Vai Alem Das Grades
byJNR
 

Viewers also liked

PDF
World Programme for Human Rights Education: Outcomes of the Second Phase ABD...
byNaouel Abdellatif Mami
 
PDF
MEDICAMENTOS SÉCULO XIX
byUrano Andrade
 
PPT
Asp.Net Módulo3
bymichellobo
 
DOC
Ejercicio access+visualb
byvalen
 
PDF
Apresent Srh Minist Integ2
bymarjarbas
 
PDF
Caso de estudio 10·aaron melendez
byaliloinomedle
 
DOC
Meu pai 02/02/2011
byAntonio Carneiro
 
PPTX
Bloque de cierre patricia jácome
bypatricia jacome
 
PPTX
Erasmus+ - International dimension
byUNIMED - Mediterranean Universities Union
 
PDF
Untitled Presentation
bypaco7226
 
PPTX
IHCPP AE G3 PPT
byRoberto Villarroel
 
PDF
Ejercitemonos2
bysantiago echeverri
 
PPT
Patologia instersticial pulmonar
byImagenes Haedo
 
PPS
A Oportunidade Forever
byHielbert Ferreira
 
PPT
Presentacion
byqueti
 
PPT
Ucp 600
byNazrul Prime
 
World Programme for Human Rights Education: Outcomes of the Second Phase ABD...
byNaouel Abdellatif Mami
 
MEDICAMENTOS SÉCULO XIX
byUrano Andrade
 
Asp.Net Módulo3
bymichellobo
 
Ejercicio access+visualb
byvalen
 
Apresent Srh Minist Integ2
bymarjarbas
 
Caso de estudio 10·aaron melendez
byaliloinomedle
 
Meu pai 02/02/2011
byAntonio Carneiro
 
Bloque de cierre patricia jácome
bypatricia jacome
 
Erasmus+ - International dimension
byUNIMED - Mediterranean Universities Union
 
Untitled Presentation
bypaco7226
 
IHCPP AE G3 PPT
byRoberto Villarroel
 
Ejercitemonos2
bysantiago echeverri
 
Patologia instersticial pulmonar
byImagenes Haedo
 
A Oportunidade Forever
byHielbert Ferreira
 
Presentacion
byqueti
 
Ucp 600
byNazrul Prime
 

Similar to NAG - Bloomingdale SD General Data

PDF
NAG - Jefferson Township SD General Data
byCarole Rafferty
 
PDF
NAG - Jefferson Township SD JTMS
byCarole Rafferty
 
PDF
NAG - Jefferson Township SD Stanlick ES
byCarole Rafferty
 
PDF
NAG - Jefferson Township SD White Rock ES
byCarole Rafferty
 
PDF
Ocean City Intermediate School report card 2013
byOceanCityGazette
 
PDF
Ocean City Intermediate School report card 2013-14
byOceanCityGazette
 
PPT
Class orientation 2014
bycswstyle
 
PDF
NAG - Kinnelon SD Stony Brook ES
byCarole Rafferty
 
PPTX
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
byPine Tree ISD
 
PPTX
2012 2013 Formative Assessment School Goals 1 and 2
bydmc1922
 
PDF
Ocean City High School report card 2013-14
byOceanCityGazette
 
PDF
Ocean City High School report card 2013
byOceanCityGazette
 
PDF
Ocean City Primary School report card 2013
byOceanCityGazette
 
PPT
6. Student Achievement Supt Bp
byscparks
 
PDF
Driving Academic Acceleration: ELA & Math Gap Analysis
byHoughton Mifflin Harcourt
 
PPT
Week 6 presentation
byarchmedi
 
PPTX
Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt
byroverdust
 
PPT
PTA Minutes - October 2, 2012
byMatthew Foreman
 
PPT
Datag Annual Testing Accountabilty Discussion 10 081
byjborgioli
 
PPT
Datag Annual Testing Accountabilty Discussion 10 081
byguestb767
 
NAG - Jefferson Township SD General Data
byCarole Rafferty
 
NAG - Jefferson Township SD JTMS
byCarole Rafferty
 
NAG - Jefferson Township SD Stanlick ES
byCarole Rafferty
 
NAG - Jefferson Township SD White Rock ES
byCarole Rafferty
 
Ocean City Intermediate School report card 2013
byOceanCityGazette
 
Ocean City Intermediate School report card 2013-14
byOceanCityGazette
 
Class orientation 2014
bycswstyle
 
NAG - Kinnelon SD Stony Brook ES
byCarole Rafferty
 
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
byPine Tree ISD
 
2012 2013 Formative Assessment School Goals 1 and 2
bydmc1922
 
Ocean City High School report card 2013-14
byOceanCityGazette
 
Ocean City High School report card 2013
byOceanCityGazette
 
Ocean City Primary School report card 2013
byOceanCityGazette
 
6. Student Achievement Supt Bp
byscparks
 
Driving Academic Acceleration: ELA & Math Gap Analysis
byHoughton Mifflin Harcourt
 
Week 6 presentation
byarchmedi
 
Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt
byroverdust
 
PTA Minutes - October 2, 2012
byMatthew Foreman
 
Datag Annual Testing Accountabilty Discussion 10 081
byjborgioli
 
Datag Annual Testing Accountabilty Discussion 10 081
byguestb767
 

NAG - Bloomingdale SD General Data

  • 1.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 1 Narrowing the Achievement Gap: Bloomingdale Common Core and The New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge Test
  • 2.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 2 Bloomingdale School District New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge Tests Study 2006-2014 Population (2012)* 7,688 Area (sq. mi.) 9.1 Pop. Density (sq. mi) 878.6 N.J. Pop. Ranking 297 White 91.97% Black 1.1% Hispanic 9.33% Asian 2.46% Median HHI $79,044 Per Capita Income $32,417 N.J. PCI Ranking 300 Unemployment Rate 10.3% Poverty Level 5.7% No. Housing Units (2010) 3,089 Owner-Occupied Units 73.9% No. Murders (2011) 1 N.J. School Ranking 635 No. of Students 522 Cost Per Pupil $19,099 SAT Ranking 143 SAT Verbal 495 SAT Math 505 Graduation Rate (2012) 92.7% Adult Education Level, H.S. 39.9% Adult Education Level, College 17.0% Adult Education Level, Master’s 7.6% Adult Education Level, Prof/PhD 1.8%
  • 3.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 3 Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Grade 3 3 4 3 4 5 3 4 5 6 3 4 5 6 7 3 4 5 6 7 8 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 15 16 16 CORE Study Grade Schedule
  • 4.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 4 Narrowing the Achievement Gap: Bloomingdale NJASK Language Arts & Literacy Scores Grades 3 through 8
  • 5.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 5 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 BloomingdaleSchoolDistrict MarthaB.DayElementarySchoolandWalterT.BergenMiddleSchool NJASKLALProficiencyScoresbyGrade 2006-2014 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg Gr. 3 68.8% 75.9% 94.0% 45.2% 60.3% 60.2% 78.0% 67.0% 74.4% 69.3% Gr. 4 79.9% 83.8% 84.8% 66.2% 47.9% 56.4% 57.0% 60.0% 52.7% 65.4% Gr. 5 92.7% 78.9% 51.6% 62.5% 65.3% 67.6% 73.0% 60.0% 70.8% 69.2%
  • 6.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 6 Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. School Year & Grade 2014 Gr. 3 25.7% 67.6% 6.8% 74.4% Gr. 4 47.3% 52.7% 0.0% 52.7% Gr. 5 29.2% 58.5% 12.3% 70.8% 2013 Gr. 3 33.0% 63.0% 4.0% 67.0% Gr. 4 40.0% 55.0% 5.0% 60.0% Gr. 5 40.0% 55.0% 5.0% 60.0% 2012 Gr. 3 22.0% 68.0% 10.0% 78.0% Gr. 4 44.0% 51.0% 6.0% 57.0% Gr. 5 27.0% 71.0% 2.0% 73.0% 2011 Gr. 3 39.9% 56.4% 3.8% 60.2% Gr. 4 43.6% 56.4% 0.0% 56.4% Gr. 5 32.4% 67.6% 0.0% 67.6% 2010 Gr. 3 39.7% 60.3% 0.0% 60.3% Gr. 4 52.1% 47.9% 0.0% 47.9% Gr. 5 34.7% 61.1% 4.2% 65.3% 2009 Gr. 3 54.8% 43.8% 1.4% 45.2% Gr. 4 33.8% 66.2% 0.0% 66.2% Gr. 5 37.5% 57.1% 5.4% 62.5% 2008 Gr. 3 6.0% 94.0% 0.0% 94.0% Gr. 4 15.2% 83.1% 1.7% 84.8% Gr. 5 48.4% 51.6% 0.0% 51.6% 2007 Gr. 3 24.1% 69.4% 6.5% 75.9% Gr. 4 16.2% 80.9% 2.9% 83.8% Gr. 5 21.1% 75.4% 3.5% 78.9% 2006 Gr. 3 31.3% 68.8% 0.0% 68.8% Gr. 4 20.1% 75.9% 4.0% 79.9% Gr. 5 7.3% 86.6% 6.1% 92.7% and Walter T. Bergen Middle School (5th), Code 50 Martha B. Day Elementary School (3rd/4th), Code 30 Bloomingdale School District 0420 NJASK Scores Language Arts & Literacy 2006-2014
  • 7.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 7 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School and Walter T. Bergen Middle School NJASK LAL Proficiency Scores by Grade 2006-2014 Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Partially Proficient
  • 8.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 8 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School and Walter T. Bergen School NJASK LAL Combined Proficiency Scores by Grade 2006-2014 Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Advanced Proficient
  • 9.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 9 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Avg Combine d TP & TAP Avg. 68.8% 79.9% 92.7% 75.9% 83.8% 78.9% 94.0% 84.8% 51.6% 45.2% 66.2% 62.5% 60.3% 47.9% 65.3% 60.2% 56.4% 67.6% 78.0% 57.0% 73.0% 67.0% 60.0% 60.0% 74.4% 52.7% 70.8% 68.2% Total Proficient 68.8% 75.9% 86.6% 69.4% 80.9% 75.4% 94.0% 83.1% 51.6% 43.8% 66.2% 57.1% 60.3% 47.9% 61.1% 56.4% 56.4% 67.6% 68.0% 51.0% 71.0% 63.0% 55.0% 55.0% 67.6% 52.7% 58.5% 65.2% Total Partially Proficient -31.3% -20.1% -7.3% -24.1% -16.2% -21.1% -6.0% -15.2% -48.4% -54.8% -33.8% -37.5% -39.7% -52.1% -34.7% -39.9% -43.6% -32.4% -22.0% -44.0% -27.0% -33.0% -40.0% -40.0% -25.7% -47.3% -29.2% -31.8% Total Advanced Proficient 0.0% 4.0% 6.1% 6.5% 2.9% 3.5% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 5.4% 0.0% 0.0% 4.2% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 6.0% 2.0% 4.0% 5.0% 5.0% 6.8% 0.0% 12.3% 3.0% Martha B. Day School (3rd/4th) and Walter T. Bergen School (5th) Bloomingdale School District NJASK LAL Proficiency Scores by Grade - 2006-2014
  • 10.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 10 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School and Walter T. Bergen Middle School NJASK LAL Combined Proficiency Score Averages by Grade 2006-2014 Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Partially Proficient
  • 11.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 11 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 -30.7% -34.7% -31.1% 65.7% 63.2% 65.7% 3.6% 2.2% 3.3% Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School and Walter T. Bergen School NJASK LAL Proficiency Score Averages by Grade 2006-2014 Total Advanced Proficient Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient
  • 12.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 12 Martha B. Day School (3rd/4th) and Walter T. Bergen School (5th) Bloomingdale School District NJASK Proficiency Scores - Language Arts & Literacy 2006-2014 Grade 3 Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. 2006 31.3% 68.8% 0.0% 68.8% 2007 24.1% 69.4% 6.5% 75.9% 2008 6.0% 94.0% 0.0% 94.0% 2009 54.8% 43.8% 1.4% 45.2% 2010 39.7% 60.3% 0.0% 60.3% 2011 39.9% 56.4% 3.8% 60.2% 2012 22.0% 68.0% 10.0% 78.0% 2013 33.0% 63.0% 4.0% 67.0% 2014 25.7% 67.6% 6.8% 74.4% Avg 30.7% 65.7% 3.6% 69.3% Grade 4 Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. 2006 20.1% 75.9% 4.0% 79.9% 2007 16.2% 80.9% 2.9% 83.8% 2008 15.2% 83.1% 1.7% 84.8% 2009 33.8% 66.2% 0.0% 66.2% 2010 52.1% 47.9% 0.0% 47.9% 2011 43.6% 56.4% 0.0% 56.4% 2012 44.0% 51.0% 6.0% 57.0% 2013 40.0% 55.0% 5.0% 60.0% 2014 47.3% 52.7% 0.0% 52.7% Avg 34.7% 63.2% 2.2% 65.4% Grade 5 Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. 2006 7.3% 86.6% 6.1% 92.7% 2007 21.1% 75.4% 3.5% 78.9% 2008 48.4% 51.6% 0.0% 51.6% 2009 37.5% 57.1% 5.4% 62.5% 2010 34.7% 61.1% 4.2% 65.3% 2011 32.4% 67.6% 0.0% 67.6% 2012 27.0% 71.0% 2.0% 73.0% 2013 40.0% 55.0% 5.0% 60.0% 2014 29.2% 58.5% 12.3% 70.8% Avg 31.1% 65.7% 3.3% 69.0%
  • 13.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 13 NAG – Bloomingdale School District NJASK Math Scores Grades 3 through 8
  • 14.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 14 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 BloomingdaleSchoolDistrict Martha B. Day Schooland WalterT. Bergen School NJASKMath ProficiencyScoresby Grade 2006-2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg Gr. 3 78.4% 87.1% 82.1% 78.1% 70.7% 85.9% 90.0% 81.0% 81.0% 81.7% Gr. 4 86.2% 89.8% 86.7% 60.2% 75.3% 61.8% 65.0% 79.9% 78.2% 75.6% Gr. 5 80.5% 75.4% 71.9% 60.7% 69.5% 73.3% 83.0% 92.7% 78.5% 75.9%
  • 15.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 15 Bloomingdale School District 0420 NJASK Scores - Math 2006-2014 Martha B. Day School (3rd/4th) and Walter T. Bergen School (5th), Codes 30 and 50 Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. School Year & Grade 2014 Gr. 3 18.9% 40.5% 40.5% 81.0% Gr. 4 21.8% 56.4% 21.8% 78.2% Gr. 5 21.5% 55.4% 23.1% 78.5% 2013 Gr. 3 19.0% 33.0% 48.0% 81.0% Gr. 4 27.0% 52.0% 21.0% 79.9% Gr. 5 19.0% 58.0% 23.0% 92.7% 2012 Gr. 3 10.0% 35.0% 55.0% 90.0% Gr. 4 36.0% 51.0% 14.0% 65.0% Gr. 5 17.0% 56.0% 27.0% 83.0% 2011 Gr. 3 14.1% 47.4% 38.5% 85.9% Gr. 4 38.2% 49.1% 12.7% 61.8% Gr. 5 26.8% 47.9% 25.4% 73.3% 2010 Gr. 3 29.3% 29.3% 41.4% 70.7% Gr. 4 24.7% 53.4% 21.9% 75.3% Gr. 5 30.5% 52.8% 16.7% 69.5% 2009 Gr. 3 21.9% 46.6% 31.5% 78.1% Gr. 4 39.7% 42.6% 17.6% 60.2% Gr. 5 39.3% 41.1% 19.6% 60.7% 2008 Gr. 3 17.9% 59.7% 22.4% 82.1% Gr. 4 13.3% 40.0% 46.7% 86.7% Gr. 5 28.1% 56.3% 15.6% 71.9% 2007 Gr. 3 12.9% 58.1% 29.0% 87.1% Gr. 4 16.2% 41.3% 48.5% 89.8% Gr. 5 24.6% 61.4% 14.0% 75.4% 2006 Gr. 3 21.6% 48.7% 29.7% 78.4% Gr. 4 13.8% 37.9% 48.3% 86.2% Gr. 5 19.5% 64.6% 15.9% 80.5%
  • 16.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 16 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School and Walter T. Bergen School NJASK Combined Math Proficiency Scores by Grade 2006-2014 Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Partially Proficient
  • 17.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 17 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School and Walter T. Bergen School NJASK Math Proficiency Scores by Grade 2006-2014 Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Advanced Proficient
  • 18.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 18 Martha B. Day School (3rd/4th) and Walter T. Bergen School (5th) Bloomingdale School District NJASK Math Proficiency Scores by Grade - 2006-2014 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Avg Combined TP & TAP Avg. 78.4% 86.2% 80.5% 87.1% 89.8% 75.4% 82.1% 86.7% 71.9% 78.1% 60.2% 60.7% 70.7% 75.3% 69.5% 85.9% 61.8% 73.3% 90.0% 65.0% 83.0% 81.0% 79.9% 92.7% 81.0% 78.2% 78.5% 77.9% Total Proficient 48.7% 37.9% 64.6% 58.1% 41.3% 61.4% 59.7% 40.0% 56.3% 46.6% 42.6% 41.1% 29.3% 53.4% 52.8% 47.4% 49.1% 47.9% 35.0% 51.0% 56.0% 33.0% 52.0% 58.0% 40.5% 56.4% 55.4% 48.7% Total Partially Proficient -21.6% -13.8% -19.5% -12.9% -16.2% -24.6% -17.9% -13.3% -28.1% -21.9% -39.7% -39.3% -29.3% -24.7% -30.5% -14.1% -38.2% -26.8% -10.0% -36.0% -17.0% -19.0% -27.0% -19.0% -18.9% -21.8% -21.5% -23.1% Total Advanced Proficient 29.7% 48.3% 15.9% 29.0% 48.5% 14.0% 22.4% 46.7% 15.6% 31.5% 17.6% 19.6% 41.4% 21.9% 16.7% 38.5% 12.7% 25.4% 55.0% 14.0% 27.0% 48.0% 21.0% 23.0% 40.5% 21.8% 23.1% 28.5%
  • 19.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 19 -100.0%-90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School and Walter T. Bergen School NJASK Math Combined Proficiency Score Averages by Grade 2006-2014 Total Partially Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg.
  • 20.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 20 -100.0%-90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School and Walter T. Bergen School NJASK Math Proficiency Score Averages by Grade 2006-2014 Total Advanced Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient
  • 21.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 21 Martha B. Day School (3rd/4th) and Walter T. Bergen School (5th) Bloomingdale School District NJASK Proficiency Scores - Math 2006-2014 Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. Grade 3 2006 21.6% 48.7% 29.7% 78.4% 2007 12.9% 58.1% 29.0% 87.1% 2008 17.9% 59.7% 22.4% 82.1% 2009 21.9% 46.6% 31.5% 78.1% 2010 29.3% 29.3% 41.4% 70.7% 2011 14.1% 47.4% 38.5% 85.9% 2012 10.0% 35.0% 55.0% 90.0% 2013 19.0% 33.0% 48.0% 81.0% 2014 18.9% 40.5% 40.5% 81.0% Avg 18.4% 44.3% 37.3% 81.6% Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. Grade 4 2006 13.8% 37.9% 48.3% 86.2% 2007 16.2% 41.3% 48.5% 89.8% 2008 13.3% 40.0% 46.7% 86.7% 2009 39.7% 42.6% 17.6% 60.2% 2010 24.7% 53.4% 21.9% 75.3% 2011 38.2% 49.1% 12.7% 61.8% 2012 36.0% 51.0% 14.0% 65.0% 2013 27.0% 52.0% 21.0% 79.9% 2014 21.8% 56.4% 21.8% 78.2% Avg 25.6% 47.1% 28.1% 75.9% Total Partially Proficient Total Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP Avg. Grade 5 2006 19.5% 64.6% 15.9% 80.5% 2007 24.6% 61.4% 14.0% 75.4% 2008 28.1% 56.3% 15.6% 71.9% 2009 39.3% 41.1% 19.6% 60.7% 2010 30.5% 52.8% 16.7% 69.5% 2011 26.8% 47.9% 25.4% 73.3% 2012 17.0% 56.0% 27.0% 83.0% 2013 19.0% 58.0% 23.0% 92.7% 2014 21.5% 55.4% 23.1% 78.5% Avg 25.1% 54.8% 20.0% 76.2%
  • 22.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 22 NAG – Bloomingdale School District Comparison Data
  • 23.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 23 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 20132012201120102009200820072006 Bloomingdale School District Grade 4 NJASK LAL Scores Comparison Martha B. Day E.S. Gr. 4 NJASK LAL Scores NJ NAEP Average
  • 24.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 24 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Bloomingdale School District Grade 4 NJASK Math Score Comparison Martha B. Day Gr. 4 NJASK Math Scores NJ NAEP Average U.S. NAEP Average
  • 25.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 25 Martha B. Day Gr. 4 Scores Total Core Area Average Literacy Scores Total CD Area Average Literacy Score NJ NAEP Average U.S. NAEP Average 2006 79.9% 88.4% 80.2% 2007 83.8% 86.2% 80.9% 77.2% 65.8% 2008 84.8% 88.5% 83.0% 2009 66.2% 74.1% 67.6% 76.1% 65.7% 2010 47.9% 72.6% 66.3% 82.7% 66.8% 2011 56.4% 75.4% 66.2% 80.6% 61.9% 2012 57.0% 67.2% 61.6% 78.1% 66.2% 2013 60.0% 70.6% 66.7% 82.5% 70.6% Avg 67.0% 77.9% 71.6% 79.5% 66.2% NJASK LAL Scores Comparison - 2006-2013 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District
  • 26.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 26 NJASK Math Scores Comparison 2006-2013 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Gr. 4 NJASK Math Scores NJ NAEP Average U.S. NAEP Average 2006 86.2% 2007 89.8% 2008 86.7% 2009 60.2% 87.6% 81.1% 2010 75.3% 2011 61.8% 89.0% 82.0% 2012 65.0% 2013 79.9% 87.0% 83.0% Avg 75.6% 87.9% 82.0%
  • 27.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 27 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School Grade 4 NJASK LAL Score 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School Grade 4 Enrollment 2006-2011 NJASK LAL Factor Comparison - 2006-2013 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Avg. Day School Grade 4 NJASK LAL Scores 88.4% 86.2% 88.5% 74.1% 72.6% 75.4% 80.9% Martha B. Day E.S. Grade 4 Enrollment 28 67 58 69 74 55 58.5
  • 28.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 28 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School Grade 4 NJASK LAL Score 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School Grade 4 Class Size 2006-2011 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Avg. Day School Grade 4 NJASK LAL Scores 88.4% 86.2% 88.5% 74.1% 72.6% 75.4% 80.9% Martha B. Day E.S. Grade 4 Class Size 14.0 16.8 19.3 23.0 24.7 18.3 19.4 NJASK LAL Factor Comparison - 2006-2013 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District
  • 29.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 29 NJASK LAL Factor Comparison - 2006-2013 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day Elementary School Grade 4 NJASK LAL Score 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B.Day Elementary School English Speakers 2006-2011 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Avg. Day School Grade 4 NJASK LAL Scores 88.4% 86.2% 88.5% 74.1% 72.6% 75.4% 80.9% Martha B. Day E.S. English Speakers 78.7% 98.5% 98.5% 80.9% 80.9% 100.0% 89.6%
  • 30.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 30 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Average Math Score 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Average Martha B. Day Gr. 4 NJASK Math Scores 86.2% 89.8% 86.7% 60.2% 75.3% 61.8% 76.7% Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Enrollment 28 67 58 69 74 55 58.5 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District NJASK Math Scores Factor Comparisons 2006-2013 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Enrollment 2006-2011
  • 31.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 31 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District NJASK Math Scores Factor Comparisons 2006-2013 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Average Math Score 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Average Martha B. Day Gr. 4 NJASK Math Scores 86.2% 89.8% 86.7% 60.2% 75.3% 61.8% 76.7% Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Class Size 14.0 16.8 19.3 23.0 24.7 18.3 19.4 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Class Size 2006-2011
  • 32.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 32 Grade 4 - Martha B. Day School Bloomingdale School District NJASK Math Scores Factor Comparisons 2006-2013 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B. Day School Grade 4 Average Math Score 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Martha B.Day School English Speakers 2006-2011 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Average Martha B. Day Gr. 4 NJASK Math Scores 86.2% 89.8% 86.7% 60.2% 75.3% 61.8% 76.7% Martha B. Day School English Speakers 78.7% 98.5% 98.5% 80.9% 80.9% 100.0% 89.6%
  • 33.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 33 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Bloomingdale Public School District Language Arts & Literacy Versus Math NJASK Scores Comparison LAL Avg. Math Avg.
  • 34.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 34 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Bloomingdale Public Schools Comparison Language Arts & Literacy Versus Math NJASK Scores - Grade 3 LAL Gr. 3 Math Gr. 3
  • 35.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 35 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Bloomingdale Public Schools Comparison Language Arts & Literacy Versus Math NJASK Scores - Grade 4 LAL Gr. 4 Math Gr. 4
  • 36.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 36 -100.0% -90.0% -80.0% -70.0% -60.0% -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Combined TP & TAP Avg. Total Proficient Total Partially Proficient Total Advanced Proficient Bloomingdale Public Schools Comparison Language Arts & Literacy Versus Math NJASK Scores - Grade 5 LAL Gr. 5 Math Gr. 5
  • 37.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 37 NJASK Scores Comparison LAL Versus Math 2006-2014 Martha B. Day Elementary School (3rd/4th) and Walter T. Bergen Middle School (5th) Bloomingdale School District LAL Gr. 3 LAL Gr. 4 LAL Gr. 5 Avg. Combined TP & TAP Avg. 69.2% 65.4% 69.0% 67.9% Total Proficient 65.7% 63.2% 65.7% 64.9% Total Partially Proficient -30.7% -34.7% -31.1% -32.2% Total Advanced Proficient 3.6% 2.2% 3.3% 3.0% Math Gr. 3 Math Gr. 4 Math Gr. 5 Avg. Combined TP & TAP Avg. 81.6% 75.9% 76.2% 77.9% Total Proficient 44.3% 47.1% 54.8% 48.7% Total Partially Proficient -18.4% -25.6% -25.1% -23.1% Total Advanced Proficient 37.3% 28.1% 20.0% 28.5% Math Score Averages by Grade LAL Gr. 3 Math Gr. 3 LAL Gr. 4 Math Gr. 4 LAL Gr. 5 Math Gr. 5 Combined TP & TAP Avg. 69.2% 81.6% 65.4% 75.9% 69.0% 76.2% Total Proficient 65.7% 44.3% 63.2% 47.1% 65.7% 54.8% Total Partially Proficient -30.7% -18.4% -34.7% -25.6% -31.1% -25.1% Total Advanced Proficient 3.6% 37.3% 2.2% 28.1% 3.3% 20.0%
  • 38.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 38 NAG – Bloomingdale School District Enrollment Comparison
  • 39.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 39 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Bloomingdale School District Enrollment 2006-2013 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5
  • 40.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 40 Martha B. Day 030 Walter T. Bergen 050 Bloomingdale School District 0420 Enrollment 2006-2013 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Total 2006 37 28 83 148 2007 59 67 53 179 2008 64 58 62 184 2009 74 69 56 199 2010 58 74 72 204 2011 78 55 70 203 2012 61 79 56 196 2013 57 63 75 195 Average 61 62 66 189 Median Change 20 35 -8 47 Percent 33% 57% -12% 25%
  • 41.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 41 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Bloomingdale School District Total Enrollment 3rd - 5th Grades 2006-2013
  • 42.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 42 NAG – Bloomingdale School District Class Sizes Grades 3 through 5
  • 43.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 43 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Bloomingdale School District Class Size 2006-2011 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 2006 18.5 14.0 20.8 2007 14.8 16.8 13.3 2008 21.3 19.3 20.7 2009 24.7 23.0 18.7 2010 19.3 24.7 24.0 2011 26.0 18.3 23.3 2012 2013 Average 20.8 19.4 20.1
  • 44.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 44 NAG – Bloomingdale School District English-Speaking Students
  • 45.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 45 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Bloomingdale School District Percentage of English-Speaking Students 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 78.5% 98.8% 98.7% 78.2% 79.9% 94.0% 81.0% 81.7%
  • 46.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 46 NAG – Bloomingdale School District SAT Scores
  • 47.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 47 Verbal SAT Score 2013 495 2012 503 2011 498 2010 498 2009 507 2008 494 2007 488 2006 488 Butler H.S. 495 503 498498 507 494 488488 475 480 485 490 495 500 505 510 20132012201120102009200820072006 Butler High School Verbal SAT Scores 2006-2013
  • 48.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 48 Math SAT Score 2013 505 2012 501 2011 499 2010 487 2009 499 2008 499 2007 487 2006 497 Butler H.S. 501 499 487 499499 487 497 480 485 490 495 500 505 2012201120102009200820072006 Butler High School Math SAT Scores 2006-2013
  • 49.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 49 NAG – Bloomingdale School District Adult Resident Education Levels
  • 50.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 50 Bloomingdale School District Adult Educational Level 39.9% 17.0% 7.6% 1.8% Bloomingdale School District Adult Educational Level High School College Masters Profl/Doctorate
  • 51.
    Narrowing the AchievementGap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 51 Adult Education Level Bloomingdale High School 39.9% College 17.0% Masters 7.6% Profl/Doc torate 1.8% Bloomingdale School District Adult Educational Level