2
• Presentation
• Project Review
• Transit Center Needs
• Transit Center Concepts
• Q&A and Feedback on Concept Elements
• Next Steps
• Q&A
Agenda
3
Project Goals
• Develop a Master Plan that
will:
• Identify a preferred solution
that will eliminate the at-
grade crossing at Castro
Street and the railroad tracks
• Improve the functionality of
the Transit Center and
support future growth
4
• Accommodate the expected growth in train service and
station usage
• Train service to more than double over the next 10–15 years
• Relieve delays at the railroad crossing on Castro
• Railroad gate blockages in peak hours to double
• Improve safety and access for pedestrians and bicyclists
• Support the economic vitality and future growth of
downtown Mountain View
• Accommodate changes in transportation patterns and
services
Why Is It Needed?
5
Re-direct Castro at Tracks
6
Where we are now
7
Mountain View Transit Center
8
• Almost 9,000 daily Caltrain boardings and alightings
• Almost 3,000 daily VTA bus and LRT boardings and
alightings
• Almost 1,500 daily shuttle boardings and alightings
Existing Activity
9
AM Activity at Transit Center
10
PM Activity at Transit Center
11
• Insufficient shuttle space
• 147 shuttles visit transit center in peak periods each day
• Insufficient bike parking
• Bikes attached to trees, poles, and benches due to lack of available bike
parking
• Challenging pedestrian movements
• Over 300 pedestrians and bicycles cross Central Expressway in peak
hours
• Parking infringes on neighborhoods
• Parking lot fills up between 7 and 8 AM
• No pick-up/drop-off area
• Pick-up/drop-off occurs in the parking lot
Current Transit Center is Over Capacity
12
• Electrification of Caltrain will increase train frequency
and ridership
• Longer trainsets to increase Caltrain capacity
• Year 2040 ridership projected to be 97% greater than Year
2015 levels
• Modified bus routes with VTA Next Network
• Anticipated further growth in shuttles
• Continued growth in bicycle and walk access
• Surge in ride hailing services (Uber/Lyft)
Future Needs
13
• Grade-separated pedestrian crossings of Central Expressway and
Caltrain tracks
• Extended Caltrain platforms
• Bus and shuttle area to allow for future growth
• Curb space for pick-up/drop-off
• Parking garage – shared parking with downtown
• Enclosed bike parking areas
• Public spaces
• Areas for transit-oriented development
Components of the Master Plan
14
• Developed 4 concepts
• Differ in the following ways:
• Location of platforms
• Configuration of bus/shuttle area
• Location of pick-up/drop-off areas
• Location and configuration of parking garage
• Parking garage access
• Plaza configuration and size
• Concept 1 reflected least change from existing. Council Study
Session suggested focusing on Concepts 2-4 as they best achieve
project objectives
Development of Concepts
15
Concept 1
16
Concept 2
17
Concept 3
18
Concept 4
19
Evaluation of Concepts
• Bicycle/pedestrian circulation
• Bus/shuttle operations
• Flexibility for future needs
• Ease of transfers
• Integration with downtown Mountain View and Moffett area
• Auto access and circulation
• Cost
• Construction impacts
• Phasing feasibility
20
• All Concepts provide enough curb space for anticipated future
needs
• Concept 4 provides the most curb space with lots of pick-up/drop-off
space on Evelyn
• Concept 2 is likely the least expensive to construct
• Concept 4 provides a slightly larger plaza than other concepts
• Concept 4 provides greatest space for development
opportunities due to parking below ground
• Because of underground parking, Concept 4 is highest cost
• Central Expressway ramp would be utilized by approximately
25% of existing auto access to station
• Cost of ramp estimated at $25-$30 Million
Preliminary Evaluation Findings
21
Pick-Up/Drop-Off Areas and Routes
22
Pick-Up/Drop-Off Areas and Routes
23
Pick-Up/Drop-Off Areas and Routes
24
Central Expressway Access
25
Central Expressway Access
26
Central Expressway Access
27
Parking
28
Bicycle/Pedestrian Access
29
Bicycle/Pedestrian Access
30
Bicycle/Pedestrian Access
31
Bicycle/Pedestrian Access
32
Bicycle/Pedestrian Access
33
Bicycle/Pedestrian Access
34
Bicycle/Pedestrian Access
35
Bicycle/Pedestrian Access
36
Plaza Configuration
37
Transit-Oriented Development
38
Next Steps
• Refinement of Concepts
• Concept Evaluation
• City Council Study Session - March 21st
• Prepare Master Plan
• City Council - May 23rd
39
www.MountainViewTransitCenter.com
For More Information, Receive Project
Updates, or Provide Additional Feedback

Mt view tcmp community_meeting_2-02-17

  • 2.
    2 • Presentation • ProjectReview • Transit Center Needs • Transit Center Concepts • Q&A and Feedback on Concept Elements • Next Steps • Q&A Agenda
  • 3.
    3 Project Goals • Developa Master Plan that will: • Identify a preferred solution that will eliminate the at- grade crossing at Castro Street and the railroad tracks • Improve the functionality of the Transit Center and support future growth
  • 4.
    4 • Accommodate theexpected growth in train service and station usage • Train service to more than double over the next 10–15 years • Relieve delays at the railroad crossing on Castro • Railroad gate blockages in peak hours to double • Improve safety and access for pedestrians and bicyclists • Support the economic vitality and future growth of downtown Mountain View • Accommodate changes in transportation patterns and services Why Is It Needed?
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    8 • Almost 9,000daily Caltrain boardings and alightings • Almost 3,000 daily VTA bus and LRT boardings and alightings • Almost 1,500 daily shuttle boardings and alightings Existing Activity
  • 9.
    9 AM Activity atTransit Center
  • 10.
    10 PM Activity atTransit Center
  • 11.
    11 • Insufficient shuttlespace • 147 shuttles visit transit center in peak periods each day • Insufficient bike parking • Bikes attached to trees, poles, and benches due to lack of available bike parking • Challenging pedestrian movements • Over 300 pedestrians and bicycles cross Central Expressway in peak hours • Parking infringes on neighborhoods • Parking lot fills up between 7 and 8 AM • No pick-up/drop-off area • Pick-up/drop-off occurs in the parking lot Current Transit Center is Over Capacity
  • 12.
    12 • Electrification ofCaltrain will increase train frequency and ridership • Longer trainsets to increase Caltrain capacity • Year 2040 ridership projected to be 97% greater than Year 2015 levels • Modified bus routes with VTA Next Network • Anticipated further growth in shuttles • Continued growth in bicycle and walk access • Surge in ride hailing services (Uber/Lyft) Future Needs
  • 13.
    13 • Grade-separated pedestriancrossings of Central Expressway and Caltrain tracks • Extended Caltrain platforms • Bus and shuttle area to allow for future growth • Curb space for pick-up/drop-off • Parking garage – shared parking with downtown • Enclosed bike parking areas • Public spaces • Areas for transit-oriented development Components of the Master Plan
  • 14.
    14 • Developed 4concepts • Differ in the following ways: • Location of platforms • Configuration of bus/shuttle area • Location of pick-up/drop-off areas • Location and configuration of parking garage • Parking garage access • Plaza configuration and size • Concept 1 reflected least change from existing. Council Study Session suggested focusing on Concepts 2-4 as they best achieve project objectives Development of Concepts
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
    19 Evaluation of Concepts •Bicycle/pedestrian circulation • Bus/shuttle operations • Flexibility for future needs • Ease of transfers • Integration with downtown Mountain View and Moffett area • Auto access and circulation • Cost • Construction impacts • Phasing feasibility
  • 20.
    20 • All Conceptsprovide enough curb space for anticipated future needs • Concept 4 provides the most curb space with lots of pick-up/drop-off space on Evelyn • Concept 2 is likely the least expensive to construct • Concept 4 provides a slightly larger plaza than other concepts • Concept 4 provides greatest space for development opportunities due to parking below ground • Because of underground parking, Concept 4 is highest cost • Central Expressway ramp would be utilized by approximately 25% of existing auto access to station • Cost of ramp estimated at $25-$30 Million Preliminary Evaluation Findings
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
    38 Next Steps • Refinementof Concepts • Concept Evaluation • City Council Study Session - March 21st • Prepare Master Plan • City Council - May 23rd
  • 39.
    39 www.MountainViewTransitCenter.com For More Information,Receive Project Updates, or Provide Additional Feedback