MODELS OF
COMMUNICATION
GROUP 2
MODELS OF
COMMUNICATION
Are the metaphorical, simplified,
and systematic representations of
the communication process.
Standard Model of Communication
01. Linear Model
02. Interactive Model
03. Transactional Model
01. Linear Model
● One way communication.
● Sender sends the message and the
receiver only receives.
● No feedback.
● Concept of noise.
PROS
● Communication is not
continuous.
● No feedback.
● No way to know if
communication is effective.
● More prominent.
● Good for audience
persuasion and
propaganda setting.
● Intentional results.
CONS
Different Models that Follow Linear
Model of Communication
ARISTOTLE’S MODEL
LASWELL’S MODEL
BERLO’S MODEL
SHANNON-WEAVER MODEL
ARISTOTLE’S MODEL
● OLDEST COMMUNICATION MODEL
● SPEAKER CENTERED MODEL
● USED FOR PUBLIC SPEAKING AND
PROPAGANDA
● Known as action model and used to analyze mass communication.
● Used as an analysis tool for evaluating the communication process and components.
● Describes which channel is used to convey messages, to whom the message is aim at, and
what effects the message has.
BERLO’S MODEL
● The source, message, channel,
and receiver are influenced by
different factors.
● Known as “Mother of all communication models”
● Developed to improve technical communication in radio and
television.
02. INTERACTIVE MODEL
● Known as convergence model.
● Two way communication.
● Used for new media like the internet.
● There is feedback.
● Interactive but not simultaneous.
● Concept of field of experience.
PROS
● Slower feedback/delayed.
● Sender and receiver might
not know who the other
person is.
● There is a feedback
even in mass
communication.
● New communication
channels.
CONS
EXAMPLE OF INTERACTIVE MODEL
● PEOPLE’S FIELD OF EXPERIENCE AFFECTS THE
COMMUNICATION PROCESS.
● THE COMMONALITY OF EXPERIENCE TAKING
PLACE BETWEEN SENDER AND RECEIVER
ALLOWS THEM TO INTERACT.
03. Transactional Model
● SENDER AND RECEVIER INTERCHANGE
ROLES.
● SIMULTANEOUS FEEDBACK.
● CONTEXT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NOISE.
PROS
● More noise due to
communicators talking at the
same time.
● Simultaneous and
instant feedback.
● No discrimination
between sender and
receiver.
CONS
Different Models that Follow
Transactional Model of
Communication
BARLUND’S TRANSACTIONAL MODEL
HELICAL MODEL
BARLUND’S TRANSACTIONAL MODEL
● MULTI-LAYERED FEEDBACK SYSTEM.
HELICAL MODEL
● COMMUNICATION PROGRESSES WITH AGE AS
OUR EXPERIECNE AND VOCABULARY
INCREASE.
● DYNAMIC PROCESS.
THANK YOU!!
GROUP 2

MODELS OF COMMUNICATION-G2.pptx

  • 1.
  • 2.
    MODELS OF COMMUNICATION Are themetaphorical, simplified, and systematic representations of the communication process.
  • 3.
    Standard Model ofCommunication 01. Linear Model 02. Interactive Model 03. Transactional Model
  • 4.
    01. Linear Model ●One way communication. ● Sender sends the message and the receiver only receives. ● No feedback. ● Concept of noise.
  • 6.
    PROS ● Communication isnot continuous. ● No feedback. ● No way to know if communication is effective. ● More prominent. ● Good for audience persuasion and propaganda setting. ● Intentional results. CONS
  • 7.
    Different Models thatFollow Linear Model of Communication ARISTOTLE’S MODEL LASWELL’S MODEL BERLO’S MODEL SHANNON-WEAVER MODEL
  • 8.
    ARISTOTLE’S MODEL ● OLDESTCOMMUNICATION MODEL ● SPEAKER CENTERED MODEL ● USED FOR PUBLIC SPEAKING AND PROPAGANDA
  • 9.
    ● Known asaction model and used to analyze mass communication. ● Used as an analysis tool for evaluating the communication process and components. ● Describes which channel is used to convey messages, to whom the message is aim at, and what effects the message has.
  • 10.
    BERLO’S MODEL ● Thesource, message, channel, and receiver are influenced by different factors.
  • 11.
    ● Known as“Mother of all communication models” ● Developed to improve technical communication in radio and television.
  • 12.
    02. INTERACTIVE MODEL ●Known as convergence model. ● Two way communication. ● Used for new media like the internet. ● There is feedback. ● Interactive but not simultaneous. ● Concept of field of experience.
  • 14.
    PROS ● Slower feedback/delayed. ●Sender and receiver might not know who the other person is. ● There is a feedback even in mass communication. ● New communication channels. CONS
  • 15.
    EXAMPLE OF INTERACTIVEMODEL ● PEOPLE’S FIELD OF EXPERIENCE AFFECTS THE COMMUNICATION PROCESS. ● THE COMMONALITY OF EXPERIENCE TAKING PLACE BETWEEN SENDER AND RECEIVER ALLOWS THEM TO INTERACT.
  • 16.
    03. Transactional Model ●SENDER AND RECEVIER INTERCHANGE ROLES. ● SIMULTANEOUS FEEDBACK. ● CONTEXT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NOISE.
  • 18.
    PROS ● More noisedue to communicators talking at the same time. ● Simultaneous and instant feedback. ● No discrimination between sender and receiver. CONS
  • 19.
    Different Models thatFollow Transactional Model of Communication BARLUND’S TRANSACTIONAL MODEL HELICAL MODEL
  • 20.
    BARLUND’S TRANSACTIONAL MODEL ●MULTI-LAYERED FEEDBACK SYSTEM.
  • 21.
    HELICAL MODEL ● COMMUNICATIONPROGRESSES WITH AGE AS OUR EXPERIECNE AND VOCABULARY INCREASE. ● DYNAMIC PROCESS.
  • 22.

Editor's Notes