Mgb fear-no-gastric-cancer
•Download as PPT, PDF•
3 likes•802 views
The document discusses the irrational fear that some bariatric surgeons have of using the Billroth II procedure due to unfounded concerns about an increased risk of gastric cancer. It notes that the risk of gastric cancer is actually rapidly declining in the US. Studies that have tracked patients who received the Billroth II procedure for ulcers or other issues found very low actual rates of gastric cancer, much lower than predicted. Meanwhile, general and cancer surgeons commonly use the Billroth II procedure without concern. The fears appear to be driven by irrational and emotional thinking rather than evidence.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to Mgb fear-no-gastric-cancer
Similar to Mgb fear-no-gastric-cancer (20)
More from Dr. Robert Rutledge
More from Dr. Robert Rutledge (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Mgb fear-no-gastric-cancer
- 1. Irrational Fear of Gastric Cancer: CHOOSING THE BEST WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY R Rutledge MD, The Centers for Laparoscopic Obesity Surgery www.CLOS.net Email: DrR@clos.net
- 5. Dr. Rutledge USA 001-702-714-0011 DrR@clos.net CONSIDERING THE MGB? MGB IS A SUPERB SURGERY BUT… WARNING: “ THERE ARE “TRICKS AND TRAPS ”
- 9. HUMAN DECISION MAKING ERRORS Recent Research in Psychology and Neurobiology Shows that: The Human Brain is a Notoriously Bad Decision Maker
- 12. PRIMITIVE RESPONSE SYSTEMS MODIFY RISK ASSESSMENT
- 16. SURGERY HISTORY OF POOR DECISIONS JOSEPH LISTER: AMERICAN SURGEONS DELAYED ADOPTION OF ANTISEPSIS 10 YEARS
- 20. Problem Definition: Bariatric Surgery: A HISTORY OF FAILURE Procedure Assessment Jejuno-ileal Bypass (Failure) Vertical Banded Gastroplasty (Failure) Lap Band (Fail?) RNY Bypass (Fail?) BPD/DS (Fail?) Sleeve: 5% Leak, 60-80% GE Reflux, Irreversible, Weight regain (Fail?)
- 21. 1. Low Risk 2. Major Weight Loss 3. Easily performed 4. Short operative times 5. Outpatient or short hospital stay 6. Minimal Blood Loss 7. No Need for ICU Stay 8. Minimal Pain 9. Very High Patient Satisfaction 10. A Good "Exit Strategy" SUCCESS CRITERIA "IDEAL" WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY
- 22. SUCCESS CRITERIA "IDEAL" WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY 11. Change Behavior & Preferences; Marked Decrease in Hunger and Increased Satiety 12. Minimal Retching and Vomiting 13. Few adhesions or hernias 14. Minimal impact on Heart and Lung Function 15. Low Failure Rate 16. Low Cost 17. Short Recovery Time 18. Rapid Return to Work 19. Low Risk of Pulmonary Embolus 20. Durable weight loss
- 23. SUCCESS CRITERIA "IDEAL" WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY 21. Low Risk of Ulcer 22. Fat Malabsorption; low cholesterol & CV risk 23. No Plastic Foreign Body 24. Easily Verifiable Results; > 10 years of Results 25. Low Risk of Bowel Obstruction 26. Based upon sound surgical principles 27. Independent confirmation of results 28. Healthy life after surgery 29. Supported by LEVEL I Evidence; RCT (Controlled Prospective Randomized Trial) 30. Block “Sweet Eater” Failures
- 27. C: Consequences / Results / Outcomes RNY Band SG MGB 1. Low Risk - + - + 2. Major Weight Loss + - - ++ 3. Easily performed - - + + + 4. Short operative times - + + + 5. Short hospital stay - - + + + 6. Minimal Blood Loss - + + + 7. No Need for ICU Stay - + + + 8. Minimal Pain - + + + 9. High Patient Satisfaction - - - + 10. A Good "Exit Strategy" - - - + - - +
- 28. C: Consequences / Results / Outcomes RNY Band Sleeve MGB 11. Decrease Hunger + - + + 12. Min Vomiting + + + + 13. No Internal hernias - + + + 14. Min Heart/Lung - + + + 15. Low Failure Rate - - - + 16. Low Cost - - - + 17. Short Recovery - + + + 18. Return to Work - + + + 19. Low Risk of PE - + + + 20. Durable Weight Loss - - - +
- 29. C: Consequences / Results / Outcomes RNY Band SG MGB 21. Low Risk of Ulcer - + + - 22. Malabsorption of fat + - - + 23. No Foreign Body + - + + 24. Verifiable Results - - - ++ 25. Bowel Obstruction - - + + ++ 26. Sound Surgical + - + + 27. Independent confirm - - - ++ 28. Healthy life - - - ++ 29. RCT; LEVEL I Evidence - - - ++ 30. Block Sweet Eater + - - ++
- 44. CANCER QUIZ: MORE DEADLY CANCER CAUSING AGENT? A OR B A B
- 53. FEAR OF GASTRIC CANCER A Billroth II Probably Makes No Difference
- 54. FEAR OF GASTRIC CANCER A Billroth II Probably Makes No Difference
- 55. C: Consequences / Results / Outcomes RNY Band SG MGB 1. Low Risk - + - + 2. Major Weight Loss + - - ++ 3. Easily performed - - + + + 4. Short operative times - + + + 5. Short hospital stay - - + + + 6. Minimal Blood Loss - + + + 7. No Need for ICU Stay - + + + 8. Minimal Pain - + + + 9. High Patient Satisfaction - - - + 10. A Good "Exit Strategy" - - - + - - +
- 56. C: Consequences / Results / Outcomes RNY Band Sleeve MGB 11. Decrease Hunger + - + + 12. Min Vomiting + + + + 13. No Internal hernias - + + + 14. Min Heart/Lung - + + + 15. Low Failure Rate - - - + 16. Low Cost - - - + 17. Short Recovery - + + + 18. Return to Work - + + + 19. Low Risk of PE - + + + 20. Durable Weight Loss - - - +
- 57. C: Consequences / Results / Outcomes RNY Band SG MGB 21. Low Risk of Ulcer - + + - 22. Malabsorption of fat + - - + 23. No Foreign Body + - + + 24. Verifiable Results - - - ++ 25. Bowel Obstruction - - + + ++ 26. Sound Surgical + - + + 27. Independent confirm - - - ++ 28. Healthy life - - - ++ 29. RCT; LEVEL I Evidence - - - ++ 30. Block Sweet Eater + - - ++
- 63. CRITICS OF THE MINI-GASTRIC BYPASS SHOULD BE EMBARRASSED
- 64. Dr Rutledge; USA 001-702-714-0011 DrR@clos.net ARE YOU CONSIDERING THE MGB? WARNING: THERE ARE “TRICKS AND TRAPS”