A presentation from a two day conference hosted by Support for Improvement in Governance and Management and the State Audit Institution of Montenegro."Building constructive relations between Supreme Audit Institutions and Parliament: experiences from the Netherlands"
2. Presentation from Parliament’s perspective
Building constructive relations
between SAI and Parliament:
experiences from the
Netherlands
Jan Pieter Lingen, Sigma expert
3. Experiences from the Netherlands
Setting the scene:
• Parliamentary system, standing committees,
Budget Control Committee (since 1923)
• SAI: independent collegial body
• Ministry of Finance: key player
• constitutional set up / ministerial
responsibility / accountability
4. Experiences from the Netherlands
Relationship SAI-Parliament > 30 years back:
some characteristics in brief:
• voluminous annual report, difficult to digest
for parliament, next to individual financial
audit reports per ministry; no summaries, no
briefings
• highly formal contacts
• but: first performance audits and first request
for audits
5. Experiences from the Netherlands
Parliamentary initiatives in perspective of
budget right and accountability:
• Internally: clarifying role BCC re-other
committees (Rules of procedure); expert staff
BCC; budget for outsourcing research; training
course for (new) MP’s, staff and press;
procedure for control of big projects, staff BCC
core of research unit in parliament
6. Experiences from the Netherlands
Parliamentary initiatives in perspective of
budget right and accountability
• Externally-SAI: regular meetings Board SAI –
BCC; frequent working level meetings with
SAI; assigning contact persons; secondment of
SAI staff to BCC staff; SAI staff assistance in
parliamentary enquiries; SAI staff assists in
training courses MP’s; briefings SAI reports
introduced
7. Experiences from the Netherlands
Parliamentary initiatives in perspective of
budget right and accountability:
• Externally-MoF: requiring MoF to improve
budget information, to strengthen internal
audit and financial management, to submit
the accounts and the audit report in May n+1,
to introduce output/performance information
in the budget, to broaden legal mandate SAI
8. Experiences from the Netherlands
Experience in perspective:
• pro-active approach needed
• continuous identification of (new)
opportunities
• “maintenance” essential
• legal framework and rules of procedure lay
basis, understanding (and willingness to
understand!) key
9. Experiences from the Netherlands
Some ideas on the basis of NL experiences:
How to build sustainable relations parliament-SAI:
• institutionalization of relations SAI parliament via:
appointment liaison officers
joint development of procedures/guidelines for handling
reports and organisation briefings
exchange / secondment of staff
• Institutionalization of internal work practices in parliament
(dedicated committee, reporting system, hearings, inviting or
involving other committees)
• Select issues/topics that SAI and parliament can work on
jointly (“a-political”; easy for SAI to investigate/audit, easy for
parliament to attract media attention and get positive
response from government; easy wins)
10. Experiences from the Netherlands
Some ideas on the basis of NL experiences:
• keep the broader context in mind: parliamentary oversight
over the budget (scrutinize draft budget, monitor
implementation, discharge government)
For SAIs:
• be open-minded, accommodate as much as possible wishes
/needs parliament; being independent is a mind-set
• seek input for work programme and align timing reports with
parliament’s agenda
• do not overload parliament with details that do not
(immediately) demand parliament’s attention
• consider offering technical assistance (workshop on budget?)