Marcel Zeestraten, Phd
Senior consultant – Concept Engineering
Upstream Oil & Gas
Conceptual Surface Facilities Design
• Comprises the early stages of project development – Identify, Assess &
Select
• Is an integral part of a Field Development Plan
• Offers the best opportunity to influence the success of a project and
the value it creates
• Requires low expenditure compared to the project execution stage
• Requires a very small team of engineers, with a very broad skill set
 Solid process engineering background
 Good understanding of other oil & gas disciplines
 Reservoir engineering
 Production Technology
 Economics
 Production Chemistry
 Flow assurance
 Materials & Corrosion
 Project engineering
 Etc.
 Creativity & ability to think out-of-the-box
Front End Loading
• The practice of placing emphasis on the Conceptual Design phase in
Project Development
Conceptual Design of Surface Facilities
Marcel Zeestraten – Resume summary
Experience
Years
Upstream Oil and Gas industry 22
Shell International Staff Pool 11
Scotland 2
England 1
Venezuela 4
Petroleum Development Oman 4
Other roles in Oman 11
Petroleum Development Oman 4
BG group 3
Oman Oil E&P 1
Xodus (consultancy) 3
Feasibility / Select phases of project lifecycle 11
• PhD – Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands
• Core discipline: Process Engineering
• Examples of Conceptual Designs delivered are given in the next few slides
• Qualified HAZOP chairman
Conceptual Design Example 1: Abu Butabul – Oman Block 60
BG-Oman
Project Characteristics
• Remote location (Oman Empty Quarter)
• Gravel plain and high sand dunes
• Tight gas / condensate field
• Challenging because of marginal economics
• High level of uncertainty regarding well productivity
• Conceptual Surface Facilities design as Field Appraisal progresses
• Design capacity 90 mmscf/d of gas and 6000 bbl/d of condensate
Many different concepts considered, depending on the scale of
the development
• Extended well testing facilities
• Multiphase export to third party processing facilities
• In-field processing plant to meet export specs
Significant conceptual design aspects
• Accurate PVT characterization of well fluids
• Multiphase flow
• Corrosion and material selection
• Multiphase pressure boosting
• Gas dew point control (HC and water)
• Condensate stabilization
• Power generation
• Water disposal (evaporation pond)
• Third party contracts for processing and fluid transportation
Conceptual Design Example 2: Musandam Gas Plant
Oman Oil
Project Characteristics
• High GOR sour oil
• Offshore wellhead platform
• Subsea multiphase production pipeline to shore
• Export of stabilized crude to a tanker loading buoy
• Gas conditioning and export to a nearby power plant
• LPG extraction and export by road tanker
• Sulphur recovery and export by road tanker
• ‘Inherited’ process design required substantial rework.
• Facilities cost approx. $600 million
Process Plant Elements
• Slug catcher
• HP three phase separator
• Crude stabilization column
• 2 stage gas compression
• Gas sweetening (Amine process)
• Sulphur recovery (Claus process)
• Gas dehydration (TEG process)
• Gas HC dew point control (low temperature
separation)
• LPG extraction from gas condensate
• Sour water stripper
• Crude storage
• Crude export to loading buoy
• Road tanker loading for LPG and Sulphur
• Flare
• Utilities
Conceptual Design Example 3: Marmul Polymer project
Petroleum Development Oman
Off-plot facilities
• Massive infill campaign doubles the number of wells from 600 to 1200 – with
an option to double again to 2400 wells in future
• Surface congestion necessitates re-design of fluids gathering system
• Innovative design realizes $200 million savings in fluid gathering
• A further $100 million savings identified subject to a successful technology trial
• Design allows switch over from old to new design with minimal deferment
On-plot facilities
• Water de-oiling in the presence of back-produced
polymer challenges existing technology
 Search for innovative technologies in the market
that meet that challenge
• Substantial expansion of produced water clean-up,
pumping and polymer mixing facilities.
Total surface facilities cost exceeds $ 1 billion.
Conceptual Design Example 4: Field Development Plans
Petroleum Development Oman
Project Characteristics
• FDP studies for 3 clusters totaling 15 fields have been awarded to consultant
• Predominantly brown field developments
• Two clusters have been completed so far.
• Surface facilities conceptual designs identify > $100 mln in savings
Subjects Addressed
• Evaluate opportunities to recover flared gas
economically
• Trouble shoot operational problems related to control
of deep water disposal pumps with variable speed
drive
• Identify causes of poor well test accuracy
• Evaluate pros and cons of produced water re-injection
vs. injection of water from water supply wells
• Design well testing and produced fluids gathering
systems to minimize cost.
• Identify surface facilities debottlenecking
requirements to accommodate incremental
production and water injection rates.
HAZOP Chairman
 Approved HAZOP Chairman for Petroleum Development Oman
 Examples of HAZOP studies chaired recently:
• 11 km Gas Pipeline in Kurdistan
Client: DNO
• High GOR, 10% H2S early production facility in Kurdistan
Client: HKN

Marcel Zeestraten - Concept Engineer

  • 1.
    Marcel Zeestraten, Phd Seniorconsultant – Concept Engineering Upstream Oil & Gas
  • 2.
    Conceptual Surface FacilitiesDesign • Comprises the early stages of project development – Identify, Assess & Select • Is an integral part of a Field Development Plan • Offers the best opportunity to influence the success of a project and the value it creates • Requires low expenditure compared to the project execution stage • Requires a very small team of engineers, with a very broad skill set  Solid process engineering background  Good understanding of other oil & gas disciplines  Reservoir engineering  Production Technology  Economics  Production Chemistry  Flow assurance  Materials & Corrosion  Project engineering  Etc.  Creativity & ability to think out-of-the-box Front End Loading • The practice of placing emphasis on the Conceptual Design phase in Project Development Conceptual Design of Surface Facilities
  • 3.
    Marcel Zeestraten –Resume summary Experience Years Upstream Oil and Gas industry 22 Shell International Staff Pool 11 Scotland 2 England 1 Venezuela 4 Petroleum Development Oman 4 Other roles in Oman 11 Petroleum Development Oman 4 BG group 3 Oman Oil E&P 1 Xodus (consultancy) 3 Feasibility / Select phases of project lifecycle 11 • PhD – Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands • Core discipline: Process Engineering • Examples of Conceptual Designs delivered are given in the next few slides • Qualified HAZOP chairman
  • 4.
    Conceptual Design Example1: Abu Butabul – Oman Block 60 BG-Oman Project Characteristics • Remote location (Oman Empty Quarter) • Gravel plain and high sand dunes • Tight gas / condensate field • Challenging because of marginal economics • High level of uncertainty regarding well productivity • Conceptual Surface Facilities design as Field Appraisal progresses • Design capacity 90 mmscf/d of gas and 6000 bbl/d of condensate Many different concepts considered, depending on the scale of the development • Extended well testing facilities • Multiphase export to third party processing facilities • In-field processing plant to meet export specs Significant conceptual design aspects • Accurate PVT characterization of well fluids • Multiphase flow • Corrosion and material selection • Multiphase pressure boosting • Gas dew point control (HC and water) • Condensate stabilization • Power generation • Water disposal (evaporation pond) • Third party contracts for processing and fluid transportation
  • 5.
    Conceptual Design Example2: Musandam Gas Plant Oman Oil Project Characteristics • High GOR sour oil • Offshore wellhead platform • Subsea multiphase production pipeline to shore • Export of stabilized crude to a tanker loading buoy • Gas conditioning and export to a nearby power plant • LPG extraction and export by road tanker • Sulphur recovery and export by road tanker • ‘Inherited’ process design required substantial rework. • Facilities cost approx. $600 million Process Plant Elements • Slug catcher • HP three phase separator • Crude stabilization column • 2 stage gas compression • Gas sweetening (Amine process) • Sulphur recovery (Claus process) • Gas dehydration (TEG process) • Gas HC dew point control (low temperature separation) • LPG extraction from gas condensate • Sour water stripper • Crude storage • Crude export to loading buoy • Road tanker loading for LPG and Sulphur • Flare • Utilities
  • 6.
    Conceptual Design Example3: Marmul Polymer project Petroleum Development Oman Off-plot facilities • Massive infill campaign doubles the number of wells from 600 to 1200 – with an option to double again to 2400 wells in future • Surface congestion necessitates re-design of fluids gathering system • Innovative design realizes $200 million savings in fluid gathering • A further $100 million savings identified subject to a successful technology trial • Design allows switch over from old to new design with minimal deferment On-plot facilities • Water de-oiling in the presence of back-produced polymer challenges existing technology  Search for innovative technologies in the market that meet that challenge • Substantial expansion of produced water clean-up, pumping and polymer mixing facilities. Total surface facilities cost exceeds $ 1 billion.
  • 7.
    Conceptual Design Example4: Field Development Plans Petroleum Development Oman Project Characteristics • FDP studies for 3 clusters totaling 15 fields have been awarded to consultant • Predominantly brown field developments • Two clusters have been completed so far. • Surface facilities conceptual designs identify > $100 mln in savings Subjects Addressed • Evaluate opportunities to recover flared gas economically • Trouble shoot operational problems related to control of deep water disposal pumps with variable speed drive • Identify causes of poor well test accuracy • Evaluate pros and cons of produced water re-injection vs. injection of water from water supply wells • Design well testing and produced fluids gathering systems to minimize cost. • Identify surface facilities debottlenecking requirements to accommodate incremental production and water injection rates.
  • 8.
    HAZOP Chairman  ApprovedHAZOP Chairman for Petroleum Development Oman  Examples of HAZOP studies chaired recently: • 11 km Gas Pipeline in Kurdistan Client: DNO • High GOR, 10% H2S early production facility in Kurdistan Client: HKN