This document analyzes 157 articles published over 10 years that describe collaborations between librarians and non-library faculty in the sciences. It finds that the majority of collaborations were between librarians and faculty at doctoral universities with high research activity. Many articles involved health sciences collaborations and topics related to instruction and information literacy. The top journals publishing these collaborative articles were library-focused, with the Journal of the Medical Library Association publishing the most.
The Evolving Role of the Library in Institutional and Faculty AssessmentState Of Innovation
A Discussion of Research Metrics - June 2016
Kim Powel, Life Sciences Informationist Emory University
Holly Miller, Associate Dean Scholarly Content and Faculty Engagement, Florida International University
Joey Figueroa, Solutions Specialist Thomson Reuters
Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and ScopusNees Jan van Eck
Presentation at the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, Wuhan, China, October 19, 2017.
We present a large-scale analysis of the accuracy of citation data in the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The analysis is based on citations given in publications in Elsevier journals. We reveal significant data quality problems for both databases. Missing and incorrect references are important problems in Web of Science. Duplicate publications are a serious problem in Scopus.
Citing Sources: An Overview for Academic LibrariansTim Gorichanaz
Overview of the fundamentals of citations (bibliographic referencing) for academic librarians. What citations are fundamentally, why we cite, what we cite and how we cite... followed by a concrete example in APA, MLA and Chicago.
See video version (with audio) at https://youtu.be/BsYr90GUK3k
The Evolving Role of the Library in Institutional and Faculty AssessmentState Of Innovation
A Discussion of Research Metrics - June 2016
Kim Powel, Life Sciences Informationist Emory University
Holly Miller, Associate Dean Scholarly Content and Faculty Engagement, Florida International University
Joey Figueroa, Solutions Specialist Thomson Reuters
Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and ScopusNees Jan van Eck
Presentation at the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, Wuhan, China, October 19, 2017.
We present a large-scale analysis of the accuracy of citation data in the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The analysis is based on citations given in publications in Elsevier journals. We reveal significant data quality problems for both databases. Missing and incorrect references are important problems in Web of Science. Duplicate publications are a serious problem in Scopus.
Citing Sources: An Overview for Academic LibrariansTim Gorichanaz
Overview of the fundamentals of citations (bibliographic referencing) for academic librarians. What citations are fundamentally, why we cite, what we cite and how we cite... followed by a concrete example in APA, MLA and Chicago.
See video version (with audio) at https://youtu.be/BsYr90GUK3k
Presentation at the Colloquium Research Information Systems and Science Classifications: Revisiting the NARCIS Classification, Museum Meermanno, The Hague, The Netherlands, September 28, 2018.
Supporting Bibliometrics by Jenny Delasalle, Academic Support Manager (Research), University of Warwick. Presentation at the Research Evaluation: Is It Our Business? The Role of Librarians in the Brave New World of Research Evaluation 29 June 2011, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Campus.
Using Google Scholar, PubMed LinkOut and Loansome Doc to get medical journal articles for clinicians in private practice, followed by pointers to free and open-access journals.
Where to publish : evaluating journals including Journal Impact Factors, Indexing and Abstracting Services, relevance to your discipline, peer review process, ranking within your discipline
Northern Collaboration Conference 2014: The development of bibliometric and c...northerncollaboration
Northern Collaboration Conference 2014: The development of bibliometric and citation analysis services by Stephen Pearson & Scott Taylor. Delivered at the Northern Collaboration conference, 5th September 2014.
Mary Moser, Learning Commons Librarian, and Satu Riutta, Institutional Research Associate, both of Oxford College of Emory University, presented their findings from the Research Practices Survey at the Association of General and Liberal Studies conference in October 2009.
Creation, Transformation, Dissemination and Preservation: Advocating for Scho...NASIG
As the fight for research grants intensifies and the pot of money decreases, librarians need to ensure that the topic of scholarly communication remains on the forefront, regardless of funding. Affording researchers avenues to widely share and publish their work to make it widely available should be a mission both in the library and at the highest levels of the institution. How can libraries make an impact? In this presentation two librarians, a consortia officer and vendor, will discuss how consortia have and continue to play a primary role in advocating for dissemination of information and scholarly communication. Additionally, they will discuss other tools that libraries/researchers can use as a method of collaboration, whether regional or international, and why it is essential for libraries to become part of the solution before they are left out in the cold. Please come prepared to discuss how your library is making an impact on this topic.
Anne McKee
Program Officer for Resource Sharing, Greater Western Library Alliance
McKee received her M.L.S. from Indiana University, Bloomington and has had a very diverse career in librarianship. She has been an academic librarian, a sales rep for two subscription agencies and now a consortium officer for the past 13 years. A former President of NASIG, McKee is on the Serials Review Editorial Board, 3 publisher/vendor library advisory boards and strives to balance a busy career with an even busier family including a husband, 1 high schooler, 1 middle schooler, 2 dogs while being a first year newbie [and admittedly a rather bewildered] club volleyball mom: all this including wearing orthodontia! McKee is probably the only person you’ll meet with both an undergrad AND MLS in Library Science.
Christine M. Stamison
Senior Customer Relations Manager, Swets
Addison, IL
Christine Stamison, Senior Customer Relations Manager for Swets, has worked in various positions in the subscription agent industry for the past 20 years. Previously, she worked for 13 years in academic libraries, primarily in Serials, at both the University of Illinois at Chicago and at the University of Chicago Libraries. Christine received her Masters in Library and Information Services from Rosary College (now Dominican University) and is a regular lecturer for serials, collection development and technical services classes. When not working you can find Christine in the gym working with her trainer trying to get in shape for her upcoming vacation hiking up Machu Picchu and trekking around Easter Island.
Charleston Conference: VIVO, libraries, and users.Ellen Cramer
A presentation on what VIVO is, why it is implemented in the library, and how the interface is influenced by the user and user behaviors.
Note: The animations are not working in this upload.
Are Health Sciences Librarians Taking the EBM Challenge?Lin Wu
Paper presented at the Canadian Association for Information Science (CAIS) Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, June 5–7, 2008. The paper was also published in the conference proceedings <http://www.cais-acsi.ca/2008proceedings.htm>
Presentation at the Colloquium Research Information Systems and Science Classifications: Revisiting the NARCIS Classification, Museum Meermanno, The Hague, The Netherlands, September 28, 2018.
Supporting Bibliometrics by Jenny Delasalle, Academic Support Manager (Research), University of Warwick. Presentation at the Research Evaluation: Is It Our Business? The Role of Librarians in the Brave New World of Research Evaluation 29 June 2011, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Campus.
Using Google Scholar, PubMed LinkOut and Loansome Doc to get medical journal articles for clinicians in private practice, followed by pointers to free and open-access journals.
Where to publish : evaluating journals including Journal Impact Factors, Indexing and Abstracting Services, relevance to your discipline, peer review process, ranking within your discipline
Northern Collaboration Conference 2014: The development of bibliometric and c...northerncollaboration
Northern Collaboration Conference 2014: The development of bibliometric and citation analysis services by Stephen Pearson & Scott Taylor. Delivered at the Northern Collaboration conference, 5th September 2014.
Mary Moser, Learning Commons Librarian, and Satu Riutta, Institutional Research Associate, both of Oxford College of Emory University, presented their findings from the Research Practices Survey at the Association of General and Liberal Studies conference in October 2009.
Creation, Transformation, Dissemination and Preservation: Advocating for Scho...NASIG
As the fight for research grants intensifies and the pot of money decreases, librarians need to ensure that the topic of scholarly communication remains on the forefront, regardless of funding. Affording researchers avenues to widely share and publish their work to make it widely available should be a mission both in the library and at the highest levels of the institution. How can libraries make an impact? In this presentation two librarians, a consortia officer and vendor, will discuss how consortia have and continue to play a primary role in advocating for dissemination of information and scholarly communication. Additionally, they will discuss other tools that libraries/researchers can use as a method of collaboration, whether regional or international, and why it is essential for libraries to become part of the solution before they are left out in the cold. Please come prepared to discuss how your library is making an impact on this topic.
Anne McKee
Program Officer for Resource Sharing, Greater Western Library Alliance
McKee received her M.L.S. from Indiana University, Bloomington and has had a very diverse career in librarianship. She has been an academic librarian, a sales rep for two subscription agencies and now a consortium officer for the past 13 years. A former President of NASIG, McKee is on the Serials Review Editorial Board, 3 publisher/vendor library advisory boards and strives to balance a busy career with an even busier family including a husband, 1 high schooler, 1 middle schooler, 2 dogs while being a first year newbie [and admittedly a rather bewildered] club volleyball mom: all this including wearing orthodontia! McKee is probably the only person you’ll meet with both an undergrad AND MLS in Library Science.
Christine M. Stamison
Senior Customer Relations Manager, Swets
Addison, IL
Christine Stamison, Senior Customer Relations Manager for Swets, has worked in various positions in the subscription agent industry for the past 20 years. Previously, she worked for 13 years in academic libraries, primarily in Serials, at both the University of Illinois at Chicago and at the University of Chicago Libraries. Christine received her Masters in Library and Information Services from Rosary College (now Dominican University) and is a regular lecturer for serials, collection development and technical services classes. When not working you can find Christine in the gym working with her trainer trying to get in shape for her upcoming vacation hiking up Machu Picchu and trekking around Easter Island.
Charleston Conference: VIVO, libraries, and users.Ellen Cramer
A presentation on what VIVO is, why it is implemented in the library, and how the interface is influenced by the user and user behaviors.
Note: The animations are not working in this upload.
Are Health Sciences Librarians Taking the EBM Challenge?Lin Wu
Paper presented at the Canadian Association for Information Science (CAIS) Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, June 5–7, 2008. The paper was also published in the conference proceedings <http://www.cais-acsi.ca/2008proceedings.htm>
e-Books: Putting Librarians And Researchers 'In The Know'tulipbiru64
Slide presentation presented by Elsevier B.V. at the 4th PERPUN International Conference 2015: Information Revolution, 11-12th August 2015 at Avillion Legacy Hotel, Melaka.
Searching and Critiquing the EvidenceBring to mind the various.docxedmondpburgess27164
Searching and Critiquing the Evidence
Bring to mind the various practice problems you and your colleagues have been considering in this course. What insights might the literature provide with regard to these issues? How should you evaluate the research? And, why is it important to review and critique this information?
This Discussion addresses strategies for searching the literature in order to critique existing evidence. Please note that this Discussion is related to Application Assignment #4, which is assigned this week. You are strongly encouraged to read through that assignment now.
To prepare:
Review the Walden Library Webinars presented in the Learning Resources.
Recall the practice problem and theoretical framework you identified for the Week 5
Discussion
(See attached file)
. Using the Walden Library and other professional databases, conduct a search and locate four
(4)
appropriate primary research articles
one of which is a systematic review.
Review the articles and determine what level of evidence they represent. Using the critique strategies presented in the Learning Resources as a guide, consider how the articles you located either support or weaken the merit of your theoretical framework or the importance of your practice problem.
By Wednesday 7/05/17, post 550 words essay in APA format with 2 references from the list below, as well as the 4 references for the articles review that include the level one headings as numbered below:
post
a cohesive response that addresses the following:
1)
How does the literature strengthen or weaken the merit of your selected theoretical framework and practice problem?
2)
What levels of evidence are most prevalent in these articles?
(I, II, III, IV or V)
3)
Why do you think that level of evidence is most prevalent?
Walden Library Webinars:
Conducting a Literature Search on a Clinical Research Question. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/nursing#s-lg-box-9896498
Evidence-Based Health Research Retried from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1523116
Introduction to Health Science Research.
Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-9897916
Medical Research: Finding Reviews. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1525868
Medical Research: Finding Studies by Type. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1526057
Medical Research: Health Policies and Legal Cases. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1526434
Recommended Webinars:
Webinars on Library Skills. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/libraryskillswebinars
Evidence Based Practice for NURS 6052. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webin.
The needs of researchers in key disciplines are changing rapidly and this has important implications for the library’s role in enhancing research productivity and impact.
Librarians can build a roadmap for supporting 21st Century research needs that draws on both published research sources and institution-specific user research. Several key trends from recent studies and ideas for institution-specific user research tools are highlighted within.
1. Mapping the convergence of
Library/Faculty Research in the
Sciences
Molly Higgins, Jennifer DeVito, Robert Tolliver, Sally Stieglitz, &
Clara Tran
Stony Brook University Libraries
6. Results: ARL Status
Number of
Institutions
ARL Status
47 ARL Institutions
50 Non-ARL Institutions in the US and
Canada
23 Non-ARL Institutions outside the US
and Canada
7. Results: Carnegie Classification
Articles Carnegie Classification
74 Doctoral Universities – Highest Research Activity
25 Doctoral Universities – Higher Research Activity
15 Master’s Colleges and Universities – Larger Programs
11 Special Focus Four-Year: Medical Schools & Centers
5 Doctoral Universities – Moderate Research Activity
4 Special Focus Four-Year: Other Health Professions Schools
4 Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences Focus
8. Results: Top Institutions
Articles Institution
10 Vanderbilt University
5 University of Tennessee
5 University of Colorado Denver
4 University of Florida
4 University of Illinois at Chicago
4 Virginia Commonwealth University
9. Results: Library Journals
Articles Library Journals
63 Journal of the Medical Library Association
27 Health Information and Libraries Journal
15 Medical Reference Services Quarterly
13 Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship
11 Science and Technology Libraries
10. Results: Library Journals Part 2
Journal Articles % of Total
Articles
Journal of the Medical Library
Association
63 11.7
Science and Technology
Libraries
11 4.8
Medical Reference Services
Quarterly
15 4.2
Issues in Science and
Technology Librarianship
13 3.6
11. Results: Education Journals
Articles Education Journals
8 Journal of Chemical Education
7 Journal of Nursing Education
4 American Biology Teacher
4 Journal of Engineering Education
2 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education
1 The Physics Teacher
1 Teaching and Learning in Medicine
0 Journal of Geoscience Education
12. Results: Discipline of Articles
114
15
14
8 6
Number of Articles
Health Sciences
Life Sciences
Chemistry
Other Sciences
Engineering
13. Results: Topics of Articles
76
30
17
10
9
6
6 3
Number of Articles
Instruction/Information Literacy
Libraries and Library Services
Information Resources
Library Users/Information Seeking
Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis
Information and Communication Technologies
Library Resources
Research and Science
19. Images (in order of appearance):
• Cengiz SARI
• Nathan Driskell
• Artem Kovyazin
• Berkay Sargin
All images from the Noun Project
20. Further Reading
Bahr, A. H., & Zemon, M. (2000). Collaborative Authorship in Journal Literature: Perspectives for
Academic Librarians Who Wish to. College & Research Libraries, 61(5), 410.
Cubberley, C. W. (1996). Tenure and Promotion for Academic Librarians. Jefferson, NC: McFarland &
Company, Inc.
Norelli, B., & Harper, T. L. (2013). Collaborative Scholarship in Academic Library Literature: Who,
What, and When. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 20(2), 173-196.
doi:10.1080/10691316.2013.789680
Rethlefsen, M. L., Farrell, A. M., Osterhaus Trzasko, L. C., & Brigham, T. J. (2015). Librarian co-
authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine
systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(6), 617-626.
doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025
Rethlefsen, M. L., Murad, M. H., & Livingston, E. H. (2014). Engaging medical librarians to improve
the quality of review articles. JAMA, 312(10), 999-1000. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.9263
Slutsky, B., & Aytac, S. (2014). Publication Patterns of Science, Technology, and Medical Librarians:
Review of the 2008-2012 Published Research. Science & Technology Libraries, 33(4), 369-382.
doi:10.1080/0194262X.2014.952486
Walters, W. H. (2016). Faculty status of librarians at U.S. research universities. The Journal of
Academic Librarianship, 42(2), 161-171. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.11.002
One objective of our study is to examine the level of collaboration between librarian and non-library faculty in the fields of science, technology and health sciences
Between the years 2005-2014
Culture and expectation of research and collaboration yields more research and collaboration
Benefits of collaboration:
May result in greater chance of being published
Distribution of workload
Opportunity for networking and outreach
Opportunity for presentation and publication, particularly important for junior librarians
Increased access to grants and funding
Selected group of peer-reviewed journals (science, technology and health)
Science & Tech (8) and Health Sciences (5)
Identified articles with multiple authors where at least one was a librarian and one a faculty member
Non-librarian collaborator couldn’t be a student, tech/ed staff, LIS faculty, high school teachers, clinical faculty, NLM employees, professional researchers
Collected details of publication (title, date, volume, issue), librarian author(s)’ name(s) and faculty author(s)’ names and affiliation(s)
Examined notable characteristics of articles
Year of collaboration
Type of institution
ARL affiliation
Carnegie classification
Number of collaborators per article
Discipline/field of faculty author(s)
Job title(s) and subject specialty of librarian(s) if identifiable
Discipline and subject specialties of collaborative article
Geographic locations of the participants’ institutions
Collaborations are intra- or inter-institutional