1. Accuracy of citation data in Web of
Science and Scopus
Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman
Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden (The Netherlands)
16th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics
Wuhan, China, October 19, 2017

2. Introduction
• Question: Can we trust citation counts in WoS and
Scopus?
• Aim: To determine accuracy of citation data in WoS
and Scopus
– Accuracy of reference data
– Accuracy of citation matching
• Approach: Comparison of references in full text of
Elsevier publications with references in WoS and
Scopus
1

3. …
References
[1] Hirsch, JE (2005)
PNAS, 102, p.16569
[2] Egghe, L (2006)
Scientist, 20, p.15
…
Approach
2
…
References
[1] Hirsch, JE (2005)
PNAS, 102, p.16569
[2] Egghe, L (2006)
Scientist, 20, p.15
…
Original
(Elsevier) publication
WoS
…
References
[1] Hirsch, JE (2005)
PNAS, 102, p.16569
[2] Egghe, L (2006)
Scientist, 20, p.15
…
Scopus
…
References
[1] Hirsch, JE (2005)
PNAS, 102, p.16569
[2] Egghe, L (2006)
Scientist, 20, p.15
…

4. Elsevier data
• Elsevier ScienceDirect Article Retrieval API
• Subscription-based journal publications in period
1987-2016
• Publication and reference data in XML format
3

5. Linking Elsevier data with WoS and
Scopus
4
WoS Scopus
Time period 1987–2016 1996–2015
Document types article, review article, review,
conference paper
No. of linked publications 6M 5M
No. of references in Elsevier data 207M 172M
No. of references in WoS/Scopus 203M 170M
No. of linked references 136M 84M

6. Number of linked publications
5

7. Analysis based
on number of
references in
publication
6

8. Linked publications classified based
on number of references
7
WoS Scopus
Equal no. of references 77.2% 96.4%
More references 2.7% 1.2%
Fewer references 19.3% 1.2%
No references 0.8% 1.2%

9. More references in WoS
8

10. Analysis based
on linked
references
9

11. Linked references without corresponding
citation relation
10

12. Validation of linked references without
corresponding citation relation
• Random sample from 2015 publications
• WoS (60 cases)
– Missing reference: 33 (55.0%)
– Incorrect reference: 10 (16.7%)
– Error in reference: 16 (26.7%)
– No problem: 1 (1.5%)
• Scopus (30 cases)
– Missing reference: 6 (20.0%)
– Duplicate publications: 9 (30.0%)
– Citation matching problem: 15 (50.0%)
11

13. Missing references in WoS (1)
12

14. Missing references in WoS (1)
13
???

15. Missing references in WoS (2)
14

16. Missing references in WoS (2)
15
???
???

17. Incorrect references in WoS (1)
16

18. Incorrect references in WoS (1)
17

19. Incorrect references in WoS (1)
18

20. Incorrect references in WoS (2)
19
Original reference in publication WoS reference
J. Wang, J.K. Carson, M.F. North, D.J. Cleland, Int.
J. Heat Mass Transfer 49 (17) (2006) 3075–3083.
WANG J, 2006, CHINESE
CHEM LETT, V17, P49
Kanber B, Hartshorne TC, Horsfield MA, Naylor AR,
Robinson TG, Ramnarine KV. Dynamic variations in the
ultrasound gray-scale median of carotid artery
plaques. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2013a;11:21.
KANBER B, 2013,
CEREBROVASC DIS S2, V35,
P21
Evans PD, Chowdhury MJA. Photoprotection of wood
using polyester-type UVabsorbers derived from the
reaction of 2 hydroxy-4(2,3-epoxypropoxy)-
benzophenone with dicarboxylic acid anhydrides. J
Wood Chem Technol 2010;30:186e204.
EVANS P, 2010, TLS-TIMES
LIT S 0326, P30
X. Li, S. Wang, Y. Chen, G. Liu, X. Yang,
Overexpression of CD40 in sacral chordomas and its
correlation with low tumor recurrence, Onkologie 36
(10) (2013) 567–571
LI XY, 2013, NANJING
NONGYE DAXUE, V36, P36
K. Zhang, H. Chen, G. Wu, K. Chen, H. Yang, High
expression of SPHK1 in sacral chordoma and
association with patients’ poor prognosis, Med.
Oncol. 31 (11) (2014) 247.
ZHANG K, 2014, IEEE T
PATTERN ANAL, V1, P1

21. Missing references in Scopus
20

22. Missing references in Scopus
21
No references

23. Duplicate publications in Scopus
22

24. Duplicate publications in Scopus
23

25. Duplicate publications in Scopus
24

26. Duplicate publications in Scopus
25

27. Citation matching problem in Scopus
26

28. 27
Citation matching problem in Scopus

29. 28
Citation matching problem in Scopus

30. Large
inaccuracies in
citation counts
of individual
publications
29

31. Interesting case
• Citation count (October 16, 2017):
– Scopus: 5,204
– WoS: 172
30

32. Differences in citation counts
between two versions of WoS
31
WoS
Dec 2016
WoS
Jun 2017
Newman, M.E.J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding
and evaluating community structure in
networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113.
2,073 139
Newman, M.E.J. (2004). Fast algorithm for
detecting community structure in networks.
Physical Review E, 69(6), 066133.
436 1,070
Clauset, A., Newman, M.E.J., & Moore, C.
(2004). Finding community structure in very
large networks. Physical Review E, 70(6),
066111.
1,156 2,627

33. Conclusions
• Citation data suffers from significant inaccuracies
both in WoS and in Scopus
• WoS
– Incorrect references
– Missing references
• Scopus
– Duplicate publications
– Citation matching problems
• Both WoS and Scopus have inaccuracies in about 1%
of references
32

34. Thank you for your attention!
33