Dark
collaboration
THE NEW VIRAL THREAT TO AGILE/LEAN INITIATIVES
LKCE 2016, KATHERINE KIRK
Agenda
 Intro
 Challenge
 Context
 Forced collaboration
 Speed = stress
 Dark collaboration
 Summary
 Anecdotes
 Conclusion
Agenda
 Intro
 Challenge
 True or false:
“Making collaboration EASIER is the aim”
 Collaboration fatigue
− Tasler, Nick. “How to avoid collaboration fatigue”. www.hbr.org/2014/07/how-
to-avoid-collaboration-fatigue/ Harvard Business Review, 10 July 2014.
www.hbr.org.
 Decision fatigue
− Craig, Lacey. “5 Ways To Minimize Decision Fatigue In Your Business”.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lacey-craig/5-ways-to-minimize-
decisi_b_9623396.html . TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc, 06 April 2014.
www.huffingtonpost.com
− Bakalar, Nicholas. “Doctors and Decision Fatigue”.
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/27/doctors-and-decision-fatigue/?_r=0
. The New York Times Company, 27 October, 2014. www.nytimes.com
− Tierneyaug, John. “Do You Suffer From Decision Fatigue?”
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/21/magazine/do-you-suffer-from-decision-
fatigue.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. The New York Times Company, 17
August, 2011. www.nytimes.com
References
 Dark Triad
− Kaufman, Scott Barry. “The Dark Triad and Impulsivity”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scott-barry-kaufman/dark-
triad_b_890003.html. TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc, 05 July 2011.
www.huffingtonpost.com
− “Dark triad” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triad
 Diversity
− MI5 Chief, Andrew Parker “MI5 head: ‘increasingly aggressive’ Russia a
growing threat to UK” https://www.theguardian.com/uk-
news/2016/oct/31/andrew-parker-increasingly-aggressive-russia-a-growing-
threat-to-uk-says-mi5-head?CMP=share_btn_tw
 Stress
− TED talk, Daniel Levitin (Neuroscientist) “How to Stay Calm when you are
stressed”
https://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_levitin_how_to_stay_calm_when_you_know
_you_ll_be_stressed/transcript
References (con’t)
Agenda
 Intro
 Challenge
 Context
 “Agile/Lean collaborative working is a
cult created by genius’ to takeover the
business world in order to make money”
 One person knows best
 Take care of royalty the most – they are the
‘HEAD’ of the universe
 Kill or jail anyone who is a threat
 Mute anyone who appears to know more
 Change via war, mutiny, secrecy, takeovers etc
Executive Management
Culture
 One person knows best
 Take care of royalty the most – they are the
‘HEAD’ of the universe
 “Kill or jail” anyone who is a threat
 Mute anyone who appears to know more
 Change via war, mutiny, secrecy, takeovers etc
 Control
 All about me
 Perfection
Documentaries
 “Wonder of the Universe” – Professor Brian Cox
 “City in the Sky” – Campbell & Fry
 “The Millionaires Holiday Club”
Gordon Gekko – 1980’s Motto Reality….
 You can get control
 Its all about ‘ME’
 You can get perfection
 Everything is in a state of change
 We need to collaborate (its not about
‘the me)
o Interdependent ecosystem
 Satisfaction is hard (perfection is rare
and not easily sustained)
3 characteristics of
existence
 Everything is in a constant state of change
 It’s not about “the me”
(we are part of an interdependent ecosystem)
 We will always battle dissatisfaction
3 characteristics of
industry
 Everything is in a constant state of change
 It’s not about “the me”
(we are part of an interdependent ecosystem)
 We will always battle dissatisfaction
Technology change
in last 25yrs
“…it seems like
250 years have
passed, not just
25…”
“No industry
has seen more
dramatic
change…over
last 25 years,
than
technology
business…”
 People had to interact to bring expertise
together to find solutions
− to complex technology problems
− and to deliver more effectively and quickly
 TO MAKE THE CUSTOMER HAPPY and get better
business value
 That’s Agile and Lean
 A PRACTICAL response to
− 3 characteristics of industry
− and increasing business demand
Agenda
 Intro
 Challenge
 Context
 Forced collaboration
 “Techs love collaboration. Execs love
collaboration. As soon as they do it,
they can’t get enough. They do it a lot
because they enjoy it so much”
 “Techs love hugging. Execs love
hugging. As soon as they do it, they
can’t get enough. They do it a lot
because they enjoy it so much”
A Kanban board does not mean we will
all instantly get along!
REALITY
Techs like collaborating as
much as hugging
Execs like collaborating
only with those they
worship or who worship
them
Agenda
 Intro
 Challenge
 Context
 Forced collaboration
 Speed = stress
Customer & Business
Demand = Stress
 “Collaboration is so fun, techs
& execs are doing more and
more just for the sake of it.
They love it so much. In fact,
they could stop collaborating if
they wanted to”
Rough guess...Increasing market demand?
Delivery cadence
1980 Every 10 years
1990 Every 5 years
2000 Every 1-2 years
2010 Every 1-6 months
Now (2016) 7 times per day?
Now we have to make more decisions than ever!
No. of deliveries
/ year
No. of interactions No of decisions
For every collaboration: 2
minimum decisions
(what next, due when)
Yearly 1 3
(min 1 BA, 1 Dev, 1 Tester)
6
Monthly 12 36 72
Fortnightly 24 72 576
Daily 192
(4 days p/w x 48 wks)
576 1,156
7 times per day 1,344 4,032 8064
Future ???? ++++ ???? ++++ ???? ++++
Waiting for 1
person to decide
= huge risk of
delay
Decisions...decisions
 The WAY we interact now matters more
− Because its how we make decisions
− It’s how we ensure
 Executives can make good strategy
 Experts ‘on the ground’ feedback VITAL information
So...here’s the issue...
Decisions need to be made
down AND up the ‘hierarchy’
now!
DECISIONS: involve whole hierarchy
 We can’t wait for 1 or 2 people
to answer our questions
 We need to be empowered
Consequence of
continuous collaboration!
 Impact of constant interaction
− More delivery == more interactions
− More interactions == more collaboration
 Collaboration = people interacting with people!!!
 Relying on people interaction means...
 Higher risk of behaviour dysfunction affecting outcome
− e.g. Misunderstanding
 WARNING: High level of interaction not managed effectively
 Exhaustion, battle weary etc
 This is stressing us out
Agenda
 Intro
 Challenge
 Context
 Forced collaboration
 Speed = stress
 Dark collaboration
 Me, me, me
 Controlling
 Manipulative
 Narcissism
 Psychopathy
 Machiavellianism
 Stress/Context can trigger a ‘soft’ combination of
these traits IN ALL OF US
− Narcissism
 me, me, me, self centred/absorbed, egotistical,
grandiose
− Psychopathy
 heartless, controlling, selfish, remorseless
− Machiavellianism
 manipulative
 We all possess to some degree – on a sliding scale
Agenda
 Intro
 Challenge
 Context
 Forced collaboration
 Speed = stress
 Dark collaboration
 Summary
Summary
“Unnaturalness” of collaboration for Techs & Execs
+ business demand for more (because it works)
= stress response
= dysfunctional behaviour – Dark Triad
= habitual responses
→ the threat: DARK COLLABORATION becomes a
real thing?
The worst form of Dark Collaboration
“Happy-making”
Business Needs
to be Successful
Translation The DARKEST
collaboration
(“Happy Making” RISK)
• Differentiation
• Competitive
advantage
• Innovation
• Creative thinking
• Risk identification
& mitigation
• Being different
• Standing out
• Crazy ideas
• New connections
• Seeing & dealing
with uncomfortable
truths HEAD on
• “yes men”
• Blending in
• Comfort culture
• Accepting as things are
• Not challenging
• Avoiding things that make
us unhappy or stressed
Business Needs
to be Successful
Translation The DARKEST
collaboration
(“Happy Making” RISK)
• Differentiation
• Competitive
advantage
• Innovation
• Creative thinking
• Risk identification
& mitigation
• Being different
• Standing out
• Crazy ideas
• New connections
• Seeing & dealing
with uncomfortable
truths HEAD on
• “yes men”
• Blending in
• Comfort culture
• Accepting as things are
• Not challenging
• Avoiding things that make
us unhappy or stressed
Business Needs
to be Successful
Translation The DARKEST
collaboration
(“Happy Making” RISK)
• Differentiation
• Competitive
advantage
• Innovation
• Creative thinking
• Risk identification
& mitigation
• Being different
• Standing out
• Crazy ideas
• New connections
• Seeing & dealing
with uncomfortable
truths HEAD on
• “yes men”
• Blending in
• Comfort culture
• Accepting as things are
• Not challenging
• Avoiding things that make
us unhappy or stressed
Agenda
 Intro
 Challenge
 Context
 Forced collaboration
 Speed = stress
 Dark collaboration
 Summary
 Anecdotes
Anecdote 1
 Raise your Awareness: See it
Anecdote 2
(the most important one)
 Embrace Neurodiversity
Neurodiversity
 Wikipedia: “Neurodiversity is an
approach [to looking at the way we
think and operate in different ways] …
that suggests that diverse neurological
conditions appear as a result of normal
variations in the human genome.”
REMEMBER
Collaborative monoculture
derails the purpose of Agile/Lean:
meeting market demand
 Embrace difference
 Respect alternative views and approaches
− Embrace spicy
− Welcome controversy
− Enjoy strange viewpoints
− Take your time
− Complain
− Rebel
 YOU ARE DOING THE COMPANY A FAVOUR
@inclusivecollab
(Investigate the work of Dr Sal Freudenberg)
Agenda
 Intro
 Challenge
 Context
 Forced collaboration
 Speed = stress
 Dark collaboration
 Summary
 Anecdotes
 Conclusion
Wrap up
 Unnaturalness of collaboration for Techs & Execs
+ business demand for more (because it works)
= stress response (Collaboration fatigue, Decision fatigue)
= dysfunctional behaviour … The Dark Triad
= habitual responses
 The threat: DARK COLLABORATION becomes a
real thing
 Biggest threat – ‘Happy Making’ comfort
collaboration
 Anecdote: See it, be mindful – embrace
neurodiversity!
 Destination EASY collaboration
= NOT TRUE
Beware the slippery slope of
comfort
 If collaborating is difficult –
you’re probably doing the right
thing!
@inclusivecollab
(Investigate the work of Dr Sal Freudenberg)
THANK YOU!
@KKIRK

LKCE16 - Dark Collaboration by Katherine Kirk

  • 1.
    Dark collaboration THE NEW VIRALTHREAT TO AGILE/LEAN INITIATIVES LKCE 2016, KATHERINE KIRK
  • 2.
    Agenda  Intro  Challenge Context  Forced collaboration  Speed = stress  Dark collaboration  Summary  Anecdotes  Conclusion
  • 4.
  • 6.
     True orfalse: “Making collaboration EASIER is the aim”
  • 8.
     Collaboration fatigue −Tasler, Nick. “How to avoid collaboration fatigue”. www.hbr.org/2014/07/how- to-avoid-collaboration-fatigue/ Harvard Business Review, 10 July 2014. www.hbr.org.  Decision fatigue − Craig, Lacey. “5 Ways To Minimize Decision Fatigue In Your Business”. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lacey-craig/5-ways-to-minimize- decisi_b_9623396.html . TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc, 06 April 2014. www.huffingtonpost.com − Bakalar, Nicholas. “Doctors and Decision Fatigue”. http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/27/doctors-and-decision-fatigue/?_r=0 . The New York Times Company, 27 October, 2014. www.nytimes.com − Tierneyaug, John. “Do You Suffer From Decision Fatigue?” http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/21/magazine/do-you-suffer-from-decision- fatigue.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. The New York Times Company, 17 August, 2011. www.nytimes.com References
  • 9.
     Dark Triad −Kaufman, Scott Barry. “The Dark Triad and Impulsivity” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scott-barry-kaufman/dark- triad_b_890003.html. TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc, 05 July 2011. www.huffingtonpost.com − “Dark triad” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triad  Diversity − MI5 Chief, Andrew Parker “MI5 head: ‘increasingly aggressive’ Russia a growing threat to UK” https://www.theguardian.com/uk- news/2016/oct/31/andrew-parker-increasingly-aggressive-russia-a-growing- threat-to-uk-says-mi5-head?CMP=share_btn_tw  Stress − TED talk, Daniel Levitin (Neuroscientist) “How to Stay Calm when you are stressed” https://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_levitin_how_to_stay_calm_when_you_know _you_ll_be_stressed/transcript References (con’t)
  • 10.
  • 11.
     “Agile/Lean collaborativeworking is a cult created by genius’ to takeover the business world in order to make money”
  • 13.
     One personknows best  Take care of royalty the most – they are the ‘HEAD’ of the universe  Kill or jail anyone who is a threat  Mute anyone who appears to know more  Change via war, mutiny, secrecy, takeovers etc
  • 14.
    Executive Management Culture  Oneperson knows best  Take care of royalty the most – they are the ‘HEAD’ of the universe  “Kill or jail” anyone who is a threat  Mute anyone who appears to know more  Change via war, mutiny, secrecy, takeovers etc
  • 16.
     Control  Allabout me  Perfection
  • 18.
    Documentaries  “Wonder ofthe Universe” – Professor Brian Cox  “City in the Sky” – Campbell & Fry  “The Millionaires Holiday Club”
  • 19.
    Gordon Gekko –1980’s Motto Reality….  You can get control  Its all about ‘ME’  You can get perfection  Everything is in a state of change  We need to collaborate (its not about ‘the me) o Interdependent ecosystem  Satisfaction is hard (perfection is rare and not easily sustained)
  • 21.
    3 characteristics of existence Everything is in a constant state of change  It’s not about “the me” (we are part of an interdependent ecosystem)  We will always battle dissatisfaction
  • 22.
    3 characteristics of industry Everything is in a constant state of change  It’s not about “the me” (we are part of an interdependent ecosystem)  We will always battle dissatisfaction
  • 24.
    Technology change in last25yrs “…it seems like 250 years have passed, not just 25…” “No industry has seen more dramatic change…over last 25 years, than technology business…”
  • 26.
     People hadto interact to bring expertise together to find solutions − to complex technology problems − and to deliver more effectively and quickly  TO MAKE THE CUSTOMER HAPPY and get better business value  That’s Agile and Lean
  • 27.
     A PRACTICALresponse to − 3 characteristics of industry − and increasing business demand
  • 29.
    Agenda  Intro  Challenge Context  Forced collaboration
  • 30.
     “Techs lovecollaboration. Execs love collaboration. As soon as they do it, they can’t get enough. They do it a lot because they enjoy it so much”  “Techs love hugging. Execs love hugging. As soon as they do it, they can’t get enough. They do it a lot because they enjoy it so much”
  • 31.
    A Kanban boarddoes not mean we will all instantly get along!
  • 32.
  • 33.
    Techs like collaboratingas much as hugging
  • 34.
    Execs like collaborating onlywith those they worship or who worship them
  • 36.
    Agenda  Intro  Challenge Context  Forced collaboration  Speed = stress
  • 37.
  • 38.
     “Collaboration isso fun, techs & execs are doing more and more just for the sake of it. They love it so much. In fact, they could stop collaborating if they wanted to”
  • 40.
    Rough guess...Increasing marketdemand? Delivery cadence 1980 Every 10 years 1990 Every 5 years 2000 Every 1-2 years 2010 Every 1-6 months Now (2016) 7 times per day?
  • 41.
    Now we haveto make more decisions than ever! No. of deliveries / year No. of interactions No of decisions For every collaboration: 2 minimum decisions (what next, due when) Yearly 1 3 (min 1 BA, 1 Dev, 1 Tester) 6 Monthly 12 36 72 Fortnightly 24 72 576 Daily 192 (4 days p/w x 48 wks) 576 1,156 7 times per day 1,344 4,032 8064 Future ???? ++++ ???? ++++ ???? ++++ Waiting for 1 person to decide = huge risk of delay
  • 42.
    Decisions...decisions  The WAYwe interact now matters more − Because its how we make decisions − It’s how we ensure  Executives can make good strategy  Experts ‘on the ground’ feedback VITAL information
  • 43.
    So...here’s the issue... Decisionsneed to be made down AND up the ‘hierarchy’ now!
  • 44.
  • 45.
     We can’twait for 1 or 2 people to answer our questions  We need to be empowered
  • 46.
    Consequence of continuous collaboration! Impact of constant interaction − More delivery == more interactions − More interactions == more collaboration  Collaboration = people interacting with people!!!  Relying on people interaction means...  Higher risk of behaviour dysfunction affecting outcome − e.g. Misunderstanding  WARNING: High level of interaction not managed effectively  Exhaustion, battle weary etc
  • 47.
     This isstressing us out
  • 49.
    Agenda  Intro  Challenge Context  Forced collaboration  Speed = stress  Dark collaboration
  • 50.
     Me, me,me  Controlling  Manipulative
  • 51.
  • 52.
     Stress/Context cantrigger a ‘soft’ combination of these traits IN ALL OF US − Narcissism  me, me, me, self centred/absorbed, egotistical, grandiose − Psychopathy  heartless, controlling, selfish, remorseless − Machiavellianism  manipulative  We all possess to some degree – on a sliding scale
  • 54.
    Agenda  Intro  Challenge Context  Forced collaboration  Speed = stress  Dark collaboration  Summary
  • 55.
    Summary “Unnaturalness” of collaborationfor Techs & Execs + business demand for more (because it works) = stress response = dysfunctional behaviour – Dark Triad = habitual responses → the threat: DARK COLLABORATION becomes a real thing?
  • 56.
    The worst formof Dark Collaboration
  • 57.
  • 59.
    Business Needs to beSuccessful Translation The DARKEST collaboration (“Happy Making” RISK) • Differentiation • Competitive advantage • Innovation • Creative thinking • Risk identification & mitigation • Being different • Standing out • Crazy ideas • New connections • Seeing & dealing with uncomfortable truths HEAD on • “yes men” • Blending in • Comfort culture • Accepting as things are • Not challenging • Avoiding things that make us unhappy or stressed
  • 60.
    Business Needs to beSuccessful Translation The DARKEST collaboration (“Happy Making” RISK) • Differentiation • Competitive advantage • Innovation • Creative thinking • Risk identification & mitigation • Being different • Standing out • Crazy ideas • New connections • Seeing & dealing with uncomfortable truths HEAD on • “yes men” • Blending in • Comfort culture • Accepting as things are • Not challenging • Avoiding things that make us unhappy or stressed
  • 61.
    Business Needs to beSuccessful Translation The DARKEST collaboration (“Happy Making” RISK) • Differentiation • Competitive advantage • Innovation • Creative thinking • Risk identification & mitigation • Being different • Standing out • Crazy ideas • New connections • Seeing & dealing with uncomfortable truths HEAD on • “yes men” • Blending in • Comfort culture • Accepting as things are • Not challenging • Avoiding things that make us unhappy or stressed
  • 63.
    Agenda  Intro  Challenge Context  Forced collaboration  Speed = stress  Dark collaboration  Summary  Anecdotes
  • 64.
    Anecdote 1  Raiseyour Awareness: See it
  • 66.
    Anecdote 2 (the mostimportant one)  Embrace Neurodiversity
  • 67.
    Neurodiversity  Wikipedia: “Neurodiversityis an approach [to looking at the way we think and operate in different ways] … that suggests that diverse neurological conditions appear as a result of normal variations in the human genome.”
  • 68.
    REMEMBER Collaborative monoculture derails thepurpose of Agile/Lean: meeting market demand
  • 69.
     Embrace difference Respect alternative views and approaches − Embrace spicy − Welcome controversy − Enjoy strange viewpoints − Take your time − Complain − Rebel  YOU ARE DOING THE COMPANY A FAVOUR
  • 70.
  • 72.
    Agenda  Intro  Challenge Context  Forced collaboration  Speed = stress  Dark collaboration  Summary  Anecdotes  Conclusion
  • 73.
    Wrap up  Unnaturalnessof collaboration for Techs & Execs + business demand for more (because it works) = stress response (Collaboration fatigue, Decision fatigue) = dysfunctional behaviour … The Dark Triad = habitual responses  The threat: DARK COLLABORATION becomes a real thing  Biggest threat – ‘Happy Making’ comfort collaboration  Anecdote: See it, be mindful – embrace neurodiversity!
  • 74.
     Destination EASYcollaboration = NOT TRUE Beware the slippery slope of comfort
  • 76.
     If collaboratingis difficult – you’re probably doing the right thing!
  • 77.
  • 78.