Literature Evaluation Table 100.0 % Article Selection 5.0 % Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 5.0 % Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 10.0 % Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 5.0 % Design. Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 5.0 % Setting or Sample Setting or sample section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 5.0 % Methods: Intervention or Instruments Methods: Intervention or instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 10.0 % Analysis Analysis section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 10.0 % Key Findings Key findings section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 10.0 % Recommendations Recommendations section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 10.0 % Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone . Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 10.0 % Presentation The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. 10.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error Duggan C, Carosso E, Mariscal N, et al. Diabetes Prevention in Hispanics: Report From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2014;11:E28. doi:10.5888/pcd11.130119. Summary; This article summarize that Hispanics are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Lifestyle interventions are effective in preventing diabetes and restoring glucose regulation. Strength: This article gives the information about HbA1C level of all age groups of Hispanic Americans. Weakness: I could not find any weakness in this article Kenya, S., Lebron, C., Arrechea, R., (2014) Glucometer use and glycemic control among Hispanic patients with diabetes in southern Florida. 2014 Apr 1;36(4):485-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.12.009. Summary: This study examined the effects of a CHW intervention on SMBG practices, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1cand knowledge of appropriate responses to glucometer readings among Hispanics. Strength: This article gives the information about how Hispanic Ame ...