1. The document discusses various aspects of the relationship between students (OTs) and faculty within an academic institution or "Academy".
2. It notes that while the Academy aims to provide knowledge to students, many students just gurgle and do not fully benefit, and that the Academy tries to make students into "Roaring Tigers" but ends up making them yawn.
3. A number of allegations are made about the breakdown in the relationship between students and faculty, the lack of focus in classes, and the mismatch between the needs of students and faculty. Solutions are sought to bridge these gaps.
8. Classes are Designed like this-
Percentage Course
35% Gap Fillers
25% Time Killers
15% Brain Drillers
25% Heart Thrillers
Allegatio
n-7
9. •A Focused analysis of its Stakeholders-
OT and Faculty
•A Holistic study of Academic Environment-
Class & Ambience
•An Idealistic Recommendation with Pragmatic
Solution
Tripolar
Study
18. A faculty is one who asks
questions in Phase – I,
provides solutions for them in
Phase-II and analyses in
Phase-III why those solutions
wont work
Second
Pole
34. Time Value of Money for OT is Nothing
And Money Value Of Time for Faculty is Something,
Which means by all means
both will achieve Everything without taking interest in Anything
1
35. Any course held in the interest of OT,
is highly beneficial for the knowledge of Academy
2
Tenure of posting in state
Days spent in Training
Full recourse
= period for
LBSNAA(TIP)
36. Confusion Coefficient of Lectures
Discourse over the Course Ratio
= o
Any course whish is proved to be grasped by OT,
is either has been learnt by him outside the Academy or inside his room
3
37. At any Class,
The Answers given by Faculty are four times more confused than
the Questions asked by the OTs and only half the time right.
4
38. At any Class,
Every statement delivered in lecture is suffixed by someone's snoring
Supply of lectures= X
Demand of lectures= O
Hence the ratio= X/O
= ∞
5